Increased Mortality in a Nationwide Study of Gastrointestinal Hospitalizations in the United States During the 2020 Coronavirus Pandemic.

Background The impact of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on patients with acute gastrointestinal (GI) presentations including acute pancreatitis, diverticulitis, and GI bleeding, requiring hospitalization, has not been fully characterized at the population level in the United States. Aims We used the National Inpatient Sample to describe inpatient gastroenterology outcomes in the United States during the first year of the pandemic (2020), using 2018 and 2019 as comparator years. Methods Using the National Inpatient Sample, we explored year-to-year and month-to-month trends in hospitalizations, length of stay, and inpatient mortality for GI presentations, including luminal, biliary, infectious, inflammatory, and pancreatic diseases, with regression modeling. Relative change was used to compare time periods. Results We observed significantly lower rates of hospitalization for most acute GI conditions in 2020 relative to 2019. Despite this, we noted an increase in all-cause mortality (0.9% in 2019 and 1.1% in 2020, p<0.001) and hospital costs for patients hospitalized with acute presentations of GI-related conditions in 2020 relative to 2019. Importantly, we also observed increased mortality among COVID-19-positive patients who were hospitalized for acute pancreatitis (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.37-6.53), variceal upper GI bleeding (OR 2.88; 95% CI 1.29-3.84), ulcerative colitis (OR 4.50; 95% CI 1.14-7.74), and acute cholangitis (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.14-4.93). In 2020, the lowest number of admissions for all conditions occurred in April, coinciding with lockdowns ordered by most state governments. Conclusions Acute GI-related hospitalizations, in general, decreased in 2020 but this was associated with higher hospital costs and all-cause mortality increased compared with the pre-pandemic period.

A comparative study of survival outcomes between partial and radical cystectomy in octogenarians with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with radical cystectomy (RC) is the preferred first-line treatment for localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Due to the concern about morbidity associated with RC, the elderly population considers bladder preservation alternatives. Guidelines suggest partial cystectomy (PC) can be considered a viable option in carefully selected individuals. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to compare the overall survival (OS) among octogenarians treated with PC and RC. Methods: Using NCDB, we retrospectively evaluated individuals aged 80 years and above diagnosed with localized MIBC (cT2-4aN0M0) with tumor size less than 5 cm and urothelial histology between 2004 and 2018. Our primary cohort was divided into the RC cohort, which included patients who underwent RC with or without chemotherapy/radiotherapy, and the PC cohort, which included those who underwent PC. After propensity-matching, we compared the OS. Results: Of 94,104 patients with MIBC, 2,528 octogenarians met our selection criteria. Among them, 313 were treated with PC, and 2,215 were treated with RC. A total of 151 (48.2%) PC patients had pelvic lymph node dissection, while 1,967 (88.8%) RC patients had lymph node dissection (P<0.001). The OS for matched PC and RC was 33.4 and 29.9 months, respectively (P=0.68). In T2 tumors, the OS for PC and RC was 37 and 33.5 months, respectively (P=0.52); for T3 tumors, the OS was 22.3 and 24.4 months, respectively (P=0.98). Conclusions: Our study compared PC and RC in octogenarians with localized MIBC and observed that PC is safe and not inferior to RC in carefully selected octogenarians. The role of PC needs further exploration by comparing or integrating with strategies like concurrent chemoradiation to improve the oncological and survival outcomes.

Frailty among Stroke Patients and its Effects on Hospital Outcomes: Frailty among Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Although assessment of frailty is increasingly being included in routine practice, its effects on hospital outcomes is not well studied. In this study, we used a national database to estimate the effects of frailty on hospital outcomes among stroke patients. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of data from Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database collected during the years 2016 to 2019. Adult patients 45 years and older with a primary diagnosis of stroke were included for the analysis. Primary outcome was frequency of frailty among stroke patients. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay, mechanical ventilation, and acute renal failure. Frailty levels were assessed by using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS). RESULTS: Among 2,031,085 stroke hospitalizations, 362,140 (17.8%) were non-frail, 1,333,000 (65.6%) were pre-frail, and 335,945 (16.6%) were frail. Regression analysis showed that the odds of mortality were significantly higher among frail (aOR, 2.82, 95% CI: 2.63-3.04) and pre-frail (aOR, 1.62, 95% CI: 1.53-1.73) patients, compared to non-frail patients. Similarly, the odds of mechanical ventilation were significantly higher among frail (aOR, 9.72, 95% CI: 8.84-10.69) and pre-frail (aOR, 3.41, 95% CI: 3.12-3.73) patients. The odds of acute renal failure were significantly higher among frail (aOR, 6.96, 95% CI: 6.62-7.33) and pre-frail (aOR, 2.94, 95% CI: 2.80-3.08) patients. CONCLUSION: Collaborative efforts by neurologists, neurosurgeons, and physiatrists towards identifying frailty and incorporating it in risk estimation measures could help improve management strategies, resource utilization, and optimization of patient outcomes among frail stroke patients.

Pathological response and survival outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with radical cystectomy in octogenarians for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an observational database study.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with radical cystectomy (RC) is the preferred first-line treatment for localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). In recent years, octogenarians have been undergoing RC uneventfully, but studies showed older adults receive NAC less often. We studied the utilization and effect of RC with or without NAC in octogenarians and compared survival outcomes between responders and non-responders. METHODS: In our retrospective study using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified octogenarians with MIBC and urothelial histology who underwent RC with or without NAC between 2004 and 2018. The NAC cohort included patients who underwent RC with NAC, and the non-NAC cohort included those with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. The NAC cohort was subcategorized into responders and non-responders based on surgical pathology. Patients with comorbidity index > 1 were not included, thereby excluding patients with possible renal impairment. After propensity-matching, we compared the overall survival (OS) between NAC and non-NAC cohorts and responders and non-responders. RESULTS: 33924 patients underwent RC, and 3056 octogenarians met our selection. Among them, 396 received NAC, and 2660 did not receive NAC. Among those who received NAC, 112(28.3%) experienced downstaging, and 223(56.4%) exhibited upstaging or no change (p < 0.001). After propensity-matching, the median OS of the NAC and non-NAC cohorts were 51.6 months and 31.3 months, respectively (p<0.001). Similarly, the median OS of responders and non-responders were 89.4 months and 26.5 months, respectively(p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In our study, we observed that NAC with RC for MIBC may help to improve OS among healthy octogenarians. Similarly, responders had better OS than non-responders.

Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic and prognostic performance of CNSide™ versus standard cytology for leptomeningeal disease.

Background: This retrospective study compares the real-world performance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) CNSide™ versus cytology in leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Methods: Consecutive patients with suspected LMD who underwent lumbar punctures for CSF cytology and CNSide™ from January 2020 to December 2022 were reviewed. LMD was classified by EANO criteria. Descriptive statistics, confusion matrix, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional regression were used. Results: Median age for 87 evaluable patients was 63 years (range: 23-93); 82 (94%) met EANO criteria for possible/probable/confirmed LMD (EANO/LMD). The commonest primary cancers were breast (36,44.0%) and lung (34,41.5%). Primary lung harbored actionable mutations in 18 (53.0%); primary breast expressed hormone receptors in 27 (75%), and HER2 amplification in 8 (22%). Uncontrolled systemic disease was detected in 35 (40%), while 25 (46%) received systemic therapy with medium/high CNS penetrance at LMD diagnosis. The median time from initial cancer to LMD diagnosis was 31 months (range: 13-73). LMD was confirmed by CSF cytology in 23/82 (28%), all identified by CNSide™. CNSide™ identified 13 additional cases (36/82, 43.9%), increasing diagnostic yield by 56.5%. Median overall survival (mOS) was 31 weeks (95%CI: 21-43), significantly worse for CNSide™ positive versus negative: 4.0 versus 16.0 weeks, respectively (HR = 0.50, P = .010). While survival since LMD diagnosis did not differ by histology, time to LMD diagnosis from initial cancer diagnosis was longer for breast (48.5 months, IQR: 30.0-87.5) versus lung (8 months, IQR:0.5-16.0) cohorts. mOS was longer for patients eligible for intrathecal chemotherapy (HR: 0.189, 95%CI: 0.053-0.672, P = .010). Conclusions: This retrospective, real-world analysis of CNSide™ showed increased sensitivity versus cytology and provided clinically relevant molecular CSF analyses.

Prevalence and outcomes of atrial fibrillation in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in patients at high cardiovascular risk. COVID-19 patients with underlying cardiovascular disease are at increased risk of poor clinical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to determine hospital outcomes among patients admitted with AF and COVID-19 infection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the 2020 California State Inpatient data, including all COVID-19 hospitalizations of individuals aged ≥18. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay (above the 75th percentile), vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission. We compared adverse hospital outcomes between those with and without AF and used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: This analysis included 94,114 COVID-19 hospitalizations, of which 9391 (10.0%) had AF. Patients with COVID-19 and AF had higher rates of adverse outcomes, including mortality (27.2% vs. 9.6%, p < .001), prolonged length of stay (40.0% vs. 27.1%, p < .001), vasopressor use (4.4% vs. 1.9%, p < .001), mechanical ventilation (19.0% vs. 9.1%, p < .001), and ICU admission (18.4% vs. 8.8%, p < .001) After multivariable adjustment, the odds of adverse outcomes remained significantly higher, including mortality adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.04, 95% CI: 1.92-2.16), prolonged length of stay (aOR, 1.37, 95% CI: 1.31-1.44), vasopressor use (aOR, 1.98, 95% CI: 1.86-2.11), mechanical ventilation (aOR, 1.95, 95% CI: 1.72-2.20), and ICU admission (aOR, 2.01, 95% CI: 1.88-2.15). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 hospitalized patients frequently have underlying AF, which confers a higher risk of adverse hospital outcomes and mortality, even after adjusting for baseline comorbidities. Heightened awareness is needed in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with AF.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart rhythm disorder, especially in patients with high cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to investigate the hospital outcomes for patients admitted with both AF and COVID-19. We used data from the California State Inpatient Database for the year 2020, focusing on COVID-19 hospitalizations of adults aged 18 and older. The main outcomes studied were in-hospital death, extended hospital stays, use of vasopressor medications that raise blood pressure, need for mechanical ventilation, and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Our results showed that patients with both COVID-19 and AF had significantly worse outcomes compared to those without AF. Specifically, these patients had higher rates of death, extended hospital stays, vasopressor medication use, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission, even after accounting for other health conditions. The study concludes that hospitalized COVID-19 patients with underlying AF are at a greater risk for severe complications and death. This highlights the need for increased attention and care for COVID-19 patients with AF to improve their hospital outcomes.

Burden of cardiovascular disease on coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalizations in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and risk factors have increased rates of adverse events and mortality after hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this study, we attempted to identify and assess the effects of CVD on COVID-19 hospitalizations in the USA using a large national database. METHODS: The current study was a retrospective analysis of data from the US National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample from 2020. All adult patients 18 years of age and older who were admitted with the primary diagnosis of COVID-19 were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included prolonged hospital length of stay, mechanical ventilation, and disposition other than home. Prolonged hospital length of stay was defined as a length of stay greater than the 75 th percentile for the full sample. The diagnoses were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. RESULTS: A total of 1 050 040 patients were included in the study, of which 454 650 (43.3%) had prior CVD. Patients with CVD had higher mortality during COVID-19 hospitalization (19.3 vs. 5.0%, P  < 0.001). Similarly, these patients had a higher rate of prolonged hospital length of stay (34.5 vs. 21.0%, P  < 0.001), required mechanical ventilation (15.4 vs. 5.6%, P  < 0.001), and were more likely to be discharged to a disposition other than home (62.5 vs. 32.3%, P  < 0.001). Mean hospitalization cost was also higher in patients with CVD during hospitalization ($24 023 vs. $15 320, P  < 0.001). Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR), 3.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.91-3.45] were significantly higher for COVID-19 hospitalizations with CVD, compared with those without CVD. Similarly, prolonged hospital length (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.43-2.23), mechanical ventilation (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 3.06-3.67), and disposition other than home (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.87-2.21) were also significantly higher for COVID-19 hospitalizations with coronary artery disease. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the presence of CVD has a significant negative impact on the prognosis of patients hospitalized for COVID-19. There was an associated increase in mortality, length of stay, ventilator use, and adverse discharge dispositions among COVID-19 patients with CVD. Adjustment in treatment for CVD should be considered when providing care to patients hospitalized for COVID-19 to mitigate some of the adverse hospital outcomes.

Integrative Bioinformatics-Gene Network Approach Reveals Linkage between Estrogenic Endocrine Disruptors and Vascular Remodeling in Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Vascular diseases, including peripheral arterial disease (PAD), pulmonary arterial hypertension, and atherosclerosis, significantly impact global health due to their intricate relationship with vascular remodeling. This process, characterized by structural alterations in resistance vessels, is a hallmark of heightened vascular resistance seen in these disorders. The influence of environmental estrogenic endocrine disruptors (EEDs) on the vasculature suggests a potential exacerbation of these alterations. Our study employs an integrative approach, combining data mining with bioinformatics, to unravel the interactions between EEDs and vascular remodeling genes in the context of PAD. We explore the molecular dynamics by which EED exposure may alter vascular function in PAD patients. The investigation highlights the profound effect of EEDs on pivotal genes such as ID3, LY6E, FOS, PTP4A1, NAMPT, GADD45A, PDGF-BB, and NFKB, all of which play significant roles in PAD pathophysiology. The insights gained from our study enhance the understanding of genomic alterations induced by EEDs in vascular remodeling processes. Such knowledge is invaluable for developing strategies to prevent and manage vascular diseases, potentially mitigating the impact of harmful environmental pollutants like EEDs on conditions such as PAD.

Dose-Escalated Preoperative Proton Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Initial Outcomes of a New Treatment Paradigm.

Purpose: Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) have varied treatment practices with regard to the use of radiation therapy (RT). Preoperative RT ∼50 Gy is commonly used, but the Surgery With or Without Radiation Therapy in Untreated Nonmetastatic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (STRASS-1) randomized trial demonstrated no improvement in abdominal recurrence-free survival with preoperative RT. Dose escalation has been proposed to improve the efficacy of preoperative RT. We analyzed RPS treated with preoperative intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) to an escalated dose of 63 Gy at a single institution. Methods and Materials: Patients who received preoperative RT with IMPT with RPS between January 2015 and October 2021 were reviewed. IMPT 63 Gy in 28 fractions to the clinical target volume high-risk and 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to clinical target volume low-risk was used. Patient baseline characteristics, RT dose parameters, toxicities, margin status, and recurrence patterns were recorded. Local control was computed by Fine-Gray analysis and overall survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Sixteen patients met the study criteria (n = 16): 12 primary and 4 isolated local recurrences. Median age was 62 years (IQR, 43.5-66 years) and 62.5% were male; 10 were liposarcoma. The median maximum tumor diameter was 19.9 cm (IQR, 12-24 cm). With a median follow-up of 18 months (IQR, 11.5-37 months), the estimated 3-year freedom from local failure rate was 68.2% (95% CI, 41.7%-94.7%); 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 68.8% (95% CI, 41.9%-95.8%). No Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥3 acute or late toxicities were noted. Conclusions: In our RPS cohort, preoperative dose-escalated RT to 63 Gy demonstrated comparable local control without G3 acute toxicities. Given the high local recurrence rates of RPS, this approach warrants further study to validate these results and identify patients most likely to benefit from therapy.

Development of a Cancer Rehabilitation Dashboard to Collect Data on Physical Function in Cancer Patients and Survivors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to describe the development of a cancer rehabilitation dashboard that collects data on physical function for cancer survivors in a cancer institute. METHODS: This project was conducted at the Miami Cancer Institute. The cancer rehabilitation dashboard was developed by a team of physicians, biostatistician, and medical informatics teams to record, report and track the physical function of cancer survivors. A multimodal approach to the measurement of physical function was used and included the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function short form, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Fatigue short form, Timed Up and Go Test, Sit-to-Stand Test in 30-sec test, four-stage balance test, and grip strength. To develop this system, a Cerner Power Form was developed based on the physical function data. To display the data, a dedicated flowsheet was developed and placed within the Oncology Viewpoint in Cerner Millennium. Thus, from inside any patient record, the flowsheet could easily be accessed by providers without leaving normal clinician workflows. Using native functionality, the data can also be shown in graphical format to facilitate dialog with patients and oncology teams. All patient data from the Cerner Power Form discrete task assays were integrated into an existing Oncology Data Warehouse for all patients. The data elements in the Cerner Power Form were identified in the electronic medical record system, loaded into the Oncology Data Warehouse, and related to the other source systems to develop reports and data visualizations such as the cancer rehabilitation dashboard. The cancer rehabilitation dashboard allows visualization of numerous parameters of physical function in cancer survivors evaluated and treated and their change over time. Rendered in Tableau, the cancer rehabilitation dashboard acts as a centralized, interactive data source to analyze and connect clinicians to near real-time data. RESULTS: The cancer rehabilitation dashboard was successfully developed and implemented into a cancer rehabilitation practice in a cancer institute and used to collect and track physical function data for cancer survivors receiving treatment and cancer survivors. This information has been used to direct the treatment plan and educate individual patients about the impact of the cancer and its treatment on physical function as well as oncology teams in a cancer institute. CONCLUSIONS: The cancer rehabilitation dashboard provides an insight into the physical function of cancer survivors receiving treatment and cancer survivors using both self-reported and objective metrics. It can be customized to suit the interests of clinicians and researchers wishing to improve the quality of life of this population.

Gender Differences in Hospital Outcomes among COVID-19 Hospitalizations.

OBJECTIVES: Many epidemiological studies have shown that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disproportionately affects males, compared with females, although other studies show that there were no such differences. The aim of the present study was to assess differences in the prevalence of hospitalizations and in-hospital outcomes between the sexes, using a larger administrative database. METHODS: We used the 2020 California State Inpatient Database for this retrospective analysis. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code U07.1 was used to identify COVID-19 hospitalizations. These hospitalizations were subsequently stratified by male and female sex. Diagnosis and procedures were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The primary outcome of the study was hospitalization rate, and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: There were 95,180 COVID-19 hospitalizations among patients 18 years and older, 52,465 (55.1%) of which were among men and 42,715 (44.9%) were among women. In-hospital mortality (12.4% vs 10.1%), prolonged length of hospital stays (30.6% vs 25.8%), vasopressor use (2.6% vs 1.6%), mechanical ventilation (11.8% vs 8.0%), and ICU admission rates (11.4% versus 7.8%) were significantly higher among male compared with female hospitalizations. Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-1.44), hospital lengths of stay (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.31-1.39), vasopressor use (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.51-1.66), mechanical ventilation (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.47-1.78), and ICU admission rates (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.51-1.66) were significantly higher among male hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that male sex is an independent and strong risk factor associated with COVID-19 severity.

Prophylactic Radiotherapy Of MInimally Symptomatic Spinal Disease (PROMISSeD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Early palliative/pre-emptive intervention improves clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with metastatic cancer. A previous signal-seeking randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that early upfront radiotherapy to asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic high-risk osseous metastases led to reduction in skeletal-related events (SREs), a benefit driven primarily by subgroup of high-risk spine metastasis. The current RCT aims to determine whether early palliative/pre-emptive radiotherapy in patients with high-risk, asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic spine metastases will lead to fewer SREs within 1 year. METHODS: This is a single-center, parallel-arm, in-progress RCT in adults (≥ 18 years) with ECOG performance status 0-2 and asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic (not requiring opioids) high-risk spine metastases from histologically confirmed solid tumor malignancies with > 5 sites of metastatic disease on cross-sectional imaging. High-risk spine metastases are defined by the following: (a) bulkiest disease sites ≥ 2 cm; (b) junctional disease (occiput to C2, C7-T1, T12-L2, L5-S1); (c) posterior element involvement; or (d) vertebral body compression deformity > 50%. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 1) or upfront, early radiotherapy to ≤ 5 high-risk spine lesions plus standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 2), in the form of 20-30 Gy of radiation in 2-10 fractions. The primary endpoint is SRE, a composite outcome including spinal fracture, spinal cord compression, need for palliative radiotherapy, interventional procedures, or spinal surgery. Secondary endpoints include (1) surrogates of health care cost, including the number and duration of SRE-related hospitalizations; (2) overall survival; (3) pain-free survival; and (4) quality of life. Study instruments will be captured pre-treatment, at baseline, during treatment, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment. The trial aims to accrue 74 patients over 2 years to achieve > 80% power in detecting difference using two-sample proportion test with alpha < 0.05. DISCUSSION: The results of this RCT will demonstrate the value, if any, of early radiotherapy for high-risk spine metastases. The trial has received IRB approval, funding, and prospective registration (NCT05534321) and has been open to accrual since August 19, 2022. If positive, the trial will expand the scope and utility of spine radiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05534321 . Registered September 9, 2022. TRIAL STATUS: Version 2.0 of the protocol (2021-KOT-002), revised last on September 2, 2022, was approved by the WCG institutional review board (Study Number 1337188, IRB tracking number 20223735). The trial was first posted on ClinicalTrials.Gov on September 9, 2022 (NCT05534321). Patient enrollment commenced on August 19, 2022, and is expected to be completed in 2 years, likely by August 2024.

The impact of COVID-19 on patients diagnosed with melanoma, breast, and colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted healthcare resource allocation and utilization of preventative medical services. It is unknown if there is resultant stage migration of melanoma, breast, and colorectal cancer when comparing extended time periods before and after the pandemic onset. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of melanoma, breast, and colorectal cancer patients was completed. Clinical and pathological staging was compared utilizing 12 and 22-month timeframes before and after the pandemic outbreak. RESULTS: Between the 22-month pre- and post-COVID-19 groups, breast cancer clinical stage T2 significantly increased, and pathological stage 2 decreased. Colorectal cancer clinical stage T1 decreased, stage T4 increased, and stage 0 decreased in the 22-month groups. In the 12-month groups, melanoma clinical stage T1 increased, and colorectal cancer clinical stage N2 increased. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating extended timeframes beyond the immediate pre- and post-COVID-19 period revealed significant increases in clinical staging of breast and colorectal cancer, suggesting advanced disease is becoming more evident as time progresses.

Hospital Outcomes in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension With Atrial Fibrillation in the United States.

In this study, using a large database, we examined the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) in hospitalized patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and in-hospital mortality and other adverse hospital outcomes. This study was a retrospective analysis of the United States National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2014. All hospitalizations for patients diagnosed with primary PH and over the age of 65 years were included and then grouped based on the presence AF. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality rate, hospital length of stay, and hospitalization costs. Weighted regression analyses were performed to find the association between AF and outcomes. Of the 5,428,332 hospitalizations with PH, 2,531,075 (46.6%) had concomitant AF. The Cox proportional regression analysis showed that in patients with PE, all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.35, confidence interval [CI] 1.15 to 1.55) was significantly higher in patients with AF than those without AF. In addition, PH hospitalizations with AF had a longer hospital length of stay (ß coefficient 1.74, 95% CI 1.58 to 1.83) and higher hospitalization cost (ß coefficient 1.33, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.42). In patients aged over 65 years admitted for PH, the presence of AF was very frequent and worsened the prognosis. In conclusion, to improve patient outcomes and decrease hospital burden, it is important to consider AF during risk stratification for patients with PH to provide timely and prompt interventions. An interdisciplinary approach to treatment should be used to account for the burden of co-morbidities in this population.

Prevalence and effects of acute myocardial infarction on hospital outcomes among COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most lethal complications of COVID-19 hospitalization. In this study, we looked for the occurrence of AMI and its effects on hospital outcomes among COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Data from the 2020 California State Inpatient Database was used retrospectively. All COVID-19 hospitalizations with age ≥ 18 years were included in the analyses. Adverse hospital outcomes included in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay (LOS), vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission. Prolonged LOS was defined as any hospital LOS ≥ 75th percentile. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to understand the strength of associations after adjusting for cofactors. RESULTS: Our analysis had 94 114 COVID-19 hospitalizations, and 1548 (1.6%) had AMI. Mortality (43.2% vs. 10.8%, P  < 0.001), prolonged LOS (39.9% vs. 28.2%, P  < 0.001), vasopressor use (7.8% vs. 2.1%, P  < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (35.0% vs. 9.7%, P  < 0.001), and ICU admission (33.0% vs. 9.4%, P  < 0.001) were significantly higher among COVID-19 hospitalizations with AMI. The odds of adverse outcomes such as mortality (aOR 3.90, 95% CI: 3.48-4.36), prolonged LOS (aOR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.10-1.37), vasopressor use (aOR 3.71, 95% CI: 3.30-4.17), mechanical ventilation (aOR 2.71, 95% CI: 2.21-3.32), and ICU admission (aOR 3.51, 95% CI: 3.12-3.96) were significantly more among COVID-19 hospitalizations with AMI. CONCLUSION: Despite the very low prevalence of AMI among COVID-19 hospitalizations, the study showed a substantially greater risk of adverse hospital outcomes and mortality. COVID-19 patients with AMI should be aggressively treated to improve hospital outcomes.

Racial difference in mortality among COVID-19 hospitalizations in California.

In the US, racial disparities in hospital outcomes are well documented. We explored whether race was associated with all-cause in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission among COVID-19 patients in California. This was a retrospective analysis of California State Inpatient Database during 2020. Hospitalizations ≥ 18 years of age for COVID-19 were included. Cox proportional hazards with mixed effects were used for associations between race and in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression was used for the association between race and ICU admission. Among 87,934 COVID-19 hospitalizations, majority were Hispanics (56.5%), followed by White (27.3%), Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American (9.9%), and Black (6.3%). Cox regression showed higher mortality risk among Hispanics, compared to Whites (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI 0.87-0.96), Blacks (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.94), and Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.95). Logistic regression showed that the odds of ICU admission were significantly higher among Hispanics, compared to Whites (OR, 1.70; 95% CI 1.67-1.74), Blacks (OR, 1.70; 95% CI 1.64-1.78), and Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American (OR, 1.82; 95% CI 1.76-1.89). We found significant disparities in mortality among COVID-19 hospitalizations in California. Hispanics were the worst affected with the highest mortality and ICU admission rates.

The Impact of Patients' Primary Language on Inpatient Gastrointestinal Bleeding Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The impact of English proficiency on gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) outcomes remains unclear. In this analysis, we compare inpatient GIB outcomes between patients with English as their primary language (EPL) and those with a primary language other than English (PLOE). METHODS: Using the 2019 State Inpatient Databases for New Jersey, Maryland, and Michigan, we created an analysis cohort of GIB hospitalizations using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. Patients were stratified by primary language (EPL vs PLOE) and type of bleeding (variceal upper GI bleeding [VUGIB], nonvariceal upper GI bleeding [NVUGIB], and lower GI bleeding (LGIB)]. Regression analyses were used to compare mortality, 30-day readmissions, and length of stay. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In the cohort, 5.5%-10% of the patients spoke a primary language other than English. Endoscopy utilization was lower among patients with PLOE vs EPL for NVUGIB (17.2% vs 21.2%, P < 0.001) and LGIB (26.3% vs 29.2%, P = 0.027). Patients with PLOE had higher odds of dying of VUGIB (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.16-2.48) and LGIB (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.22-2.12). Patients with PLOE were also more likely to be readmitted after NVUGIB (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.64-1.81). However, after controlling for the percentage of patients with PLOE discharged from each hospital, the disparities in mortality and readmissions were no longer detected. DISCUSSION: Disparities exist in GIB outcomes among patients with PLOE, but these gaps narrow at hospitals with higher percentages of patients with PLOE. Cultural and linguistic competence may improve outcomes in this vulnerable group.

Healthcare expenditure trends among adult stroke patients in the United States, 2011-2020.

BACKGROUND: In the US, between 2018 and 2019, approximately $57 billion were expended on stroke and related conditions. The aim of this study was to understand trends in direct healthcare expenditures among stroke patients using novel cost estimation methods and a nationally representative database. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 193,003 adults, ≥18 years of age, using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey during 2009-2016. Manning and Mullahy's two-part model were used to calculate adjusted mean and incremental medical expenditures after adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: The mean (Standard Deviation) direct annual healthcare expenditure among stroke patients was $16,979.0 ($16,222.0- $17,736.0) and was nearly 3 times greater than non-stroke participants which were $5,039.7 ($4,951.0-$5,128.5) and were mainly spent on inpatient services, prescription medications, and office-based visits. Stroke patients had an additional healthcare expenditure of $4096.0 (3543.9, 4648.1) per person per year, compared to participants without stroke after adjusting for covariates (P<0.001). The total mean annual direct healthcare expenditure for stroke survivors increased from $16,142.0 (15,017.0-17,267.0) in 2007-2008 to $16,979.0 (16,222.0-17,736.0) in 2015-2016. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that stroke survivors had significantly greater healthcare expenses, compared to non-stroke individuals, mainly due to higher expenditures on inpatient services, prescription drugs, and office visits. These findings are concerning because the prevalence of stroke is projected to increase due to aging population and increased survival rates.