Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome with Multiple Cerebral Infarctions Caused by Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis: An Autopsy Case Report.

We herein report an autopsy case of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome with disseminated intravascular coagulation and multiple cerebral infarctions induced by Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (STSS) in an 84-year-old male. Pathological examination revealed sepsis with hemophagocytosis in the reticular system and intravascular bacteria in multiple organs, originating from bacterial necrotizing fasciitis of the lower extremities. The brain MRI findings showed a DWI-FLAIR mismatch, whereas the pathology was almost normal, thus supporting a hyperacute phase of cerebral infarction. The findings in this case help to elucidate the pathogenesis of STSS and develop appropriate treatment strategies.

Clinical characteristics and genome epidemiology of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen increasingly responsible for difficult-to-treat nosocomial infections. OBJECTIVES: To describe the contemporary clinical characteristics and genome epidemiology of patients colonized or infected by S. maltophilia in a multicentre, prospective cohort. METHODS: All patients with a clinical culture growing S. maltophilia were enrolled at six tertiary hospitals across Japan between April 2019 and March 2022. The clinical characteristics, outcomes, antimicrobial susceptibility and genomic epidemiology of cases with S. maltophilia were investigated. RESULTS: In total, 78 patients were included representing 34 infection and 44 colonization cases. The median age was 72.5 years (IQR, 61-78), and males accounted for 53 cases (68%). The most common comorbidity was localized solid malignancy (39%). Nearly half of the patients (44%) were immunosuppressed, with antineoplastic chemotherapy accounting for 31%. The respiratory tract was the most common site of colonization (86%), whereas bacteraemia accounted for most infection cases (56%). The 30 day all-cause mortality rate was 21%, which was significantly higher in infection cases than colonization cases (35% versus 9%; adjusted HR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.22-11.96). Susceptibility rates to ceftazidime, levofloxacin, minocycline and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim were 14%, 65%, 87% and 100%, respectively. The percentage of infection ranged from 13% in the unclassified group to 86% in genomic group 6A. The percentage of non-susceptibility to ceftazidime ranged from 33% in genomic group C to 100% in genomic groups 6 and 7 and genomic group geniculate. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary multicentre cohort, S. maltophilia primarily colonized the respiratory tract, whereas patients with bacteraemia had the highest the mortality from this pathogen. Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim remained consistently active, but susceptibility to levofloxacin was relatively low. The proportions of cases representing infection and susceptibility to ceftazidime differed significantly based on genomic groups.

Comparison of the effects of cefmetazole and meropenem on microbiome: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Cefmetazole (CMZ) is a carbapenem-sparing option in the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacterial infection. In this pilot study, we aimed to compare the effects of antimicrobial treatment (meropenem [MP] and CMZ) with those of no antimicrobial treatment (control group) on the microbiome. METHODS: The study was a multicenter, prospective, observational pilot study conducted from October 2020 to October 2022. Feces and saliva samples were collected for microbiome analyses at two time points (early-period: days 1-3; and late-period: days 4-30) for the antimicrobial treatment group, and at one time point for the control group. RESULTS: Five feces (MP-F and CMZ-F) and five saliva (MP-S and CMZ-S) samples were included in the MP and the CMZ groups. Ten feces (C-F) and saliva (C-S) samples were included in the control group. Group α diversity was notably lower in the late-period MP-F group than the control group as determined with the Shannon richness index. ß diversity analysis of the feces samples based on weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances revealed distinctions in both the late-period CMZ-F and MP-F groups compared with the control group. Weighted UniFrac analysis showed that only the early-period MP-F group differed from the control group. In the saliva samples, weighted and unweighted UniFrac analyses showed significant differences between the control group and the early CMZ, late CMZ, and late MP groups. CONCLUSIONS: MP treatment may cause larger impact on the feces microbiome than CMZ in Japanese patients.

Interstitial lung disease with prolonged fever that occurred during long-term administration of olaparib in a 74-year-old ovarian cancer patient: Radiological features and considerations for preventing delayed diagnosis.

A 74-year-old woman, who had been receiving olaparib for the treatment of ovarian cancer for more than a year, visited the emergency department complaining of a fever that had lasted for 1 month. She had been taking antipyretics and antibiotics for her fever, but without any effect. Although she had no symptoms other than fever, she had stopped taking olaparib for 1 week before her visit because she had developed anemia caused by myelosuppression from olaparib. After discontinuing olaparib, her maximum body temperature decreased. On admission, chest X-ray revealed no abnormalities, but chest CT showed diffuse ground-glass opacities. Chest CT taken 5 days later showed partial improvement; therefore, we diagnosed her with interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with olaparib. After short-term steroid treatment, the ground-glass opacities disappeared, and the patient became afebrile. The CT scan taken for tumor evaluation 2 days before the onset of fever showed a few centrilobular nodular opacities and small patchy ground-glass opacities. These findings could indicate early lesions of ILD, but they seemed inconspicuous and nonspecific, and it might have been difficult to diagnose ILD then. To date, few cases of ILD associated with olaparib have been reported. However, based on previous reports, fever is often seen, and CT findings mainly comprise diffuse ground-glass opacities, and in some cases, centrilobular nodular shadows. Thus, in conjunction with the findings of the present case, these characteristics may be representative of olaparib-induced ILD.

Pyelonephritis due to Escherichia coli in the older population in Japan: Impacts on activities of daily living and medical costs.

This study aimed to investigate differences in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), at admission and discharge, as well as the medical costs of pyelonephritis in older adults in Japan. Patients hospitalized for pyelonephritis between January 1, 2013 and March 31, 2019, were retrospectively enrolled. The inclusion criteria were urine culture within 48 h of admission with > 104 colony-forming units/mL of Escherichia coli and symptoms of pyelonephritis. Patients were divided into Young (20-64 years), Pre-old (65-74 years), Old (75-84 years), and Super-old (≥ 85 years). ADL and medical costs were compared. Finally, 393 patients were included: 112 (28.5%) were Young, 72 (18.3%) were Pre-old, 130 (33.1 %) were Old, and 79 (20.1%) were Super-old between January 1, 2013, and March 31, 2019. The median differences between Barthel Index (BI) scores, which indicates ADL, at admission and discharge were 0, 0, 25, and 23 in each age group, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant differences existed between the groups aged ≥ 65. Median medical costs were $3,368, $4,894, $5,372, and $6,078 for each age group, respectively (p < 0.001). Medical costs per day did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.163). Pyelonephritis due to E. coli in patients aged ≥ 75 is associated with a decline in ADL, longer hospital stays, and higher medical costs compared to that in young patients. Pre-old patients did not have lower ADL; however, they tended to have longer hospital stays and higher medical costs.

High diagnostic accuracy of quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike-binding-IgG assay and correlation with in vitro viral neutralizing activity.

Background: Antibody testing can easily evaluate the clinical status of patients, aid in the diagnosis of multisystem inflammatory syndrome, and monitor the immunity level in the population. However, the applicability of serological tests in detecting antibodies against the severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike-binding protein remains limited. This study aimed to quantify both serum-derived neutralizing immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody activity and the amount of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike-IgG (S-IgG) in convalescent sera/plasmas and evaluate the direct correlation between the in vitro IgG-EC50 values and S-IgG values. Methods: We evaluated the neutralizing activity of purified IgG (IgG-EC50), quantified S-IgG in the serum/plasma of consecutive COVID-19 convalescent individuals using a cell-based virus-neutralizing assay, and determined the correlation between IgG-EC50 and S-IgG. In addition, we evaluated rational cut-off values using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the quantitative S-IgG assay for moderate and high IgG-EC50. Results: A high correlation was observed between S-IgG and IgG-EC50 with a Spearman's ρ value of -0.748 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: -0.804-0.678). Using an IgG-EC50 of 50 µg/mL and 20 µg/mL as the cut-off values for moderate and high in vitro neutralizing activity, respectively, the Youden's index values of 287.5 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL and 454.1 BAU/mL determined from the ROC curve showed the highest diagnostic accuracy, with Kappa values of 0.884 (95 % CI: 0.823-0.946) and 0.920 (95 % CI: 0.681-0.979), respectively. Conclusions: Quantitative S-IgG tests are a useful and convenient tool for estimating in vitro virus-neutralizing activity, with a high correlation with IgG-EC50 when the rational cut-off value is carefully determined.

Epidemiology of post-COVID conditions beyond 3 years and factors associated with their persistence longer than 2 years: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) conditions (PCCs) beyond 3 years and identify factors associated with their persistence longer than 2 years. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey. METHODS: We surveyed patients who had recovered from COVID-19 and visited our institution from February 2020 to November 2021. Demographic and clinical data and information on the presence and duration of PCCs were obtained. We identified factors associated with the persistence of PCCs longer than 2 years using multivariate linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Among 935 patients surveyed, 407 completed the survey. Among them, 360 patients had mild disease in the acute phase. The proportions of participants with at least one symptom at 1, 2, and 3 years after symptom onset or COVID-19 diagnosis were 33.2%, 29.8%, and 5.7%, respectively. The numbers of participants with and without any residual symptoms 2 years after the onset of COVID-19 were 87 and 193, respectively. After multivariate adjustment, persistence of PCCs longer than 2 years was associated with lower body mass index, presence of any underlying medical conditions, and number of symptoms lasting for more than 1 month ≥ 5. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PCCs decreased 2 years after symptom onset or COVID-19 diagnosis. We also identified factors associated with PCC persistence longer than 2 years, which could help primary care physicians and patients with PCCs predict the duration of PCCs and better understand their natural history, thus reducing patients' anxiety about their duration.

Mpox Neutralizing Antibody Response to LC16m8 Vaccine in Healthy Adults.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination against mpox (formerly known as monkeypox), an infectious disease caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), is needed to prevent outbreaks and consequent public health concerns. The LC16m8 vaccine, a dried cell-cultured proliferative live attenuated vaccinia virus­based vaccine, was approved in Japan against smallpox and mpox. However, its immunogenicity and efficacy against MPXV have not been fully assessed. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of LC16m8 against MPXV in healthy adults. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm study that included 50 participants who were followed up for 168 days postvaccination. The primary end point was the neutralizing antibody seroconversion rate against MPXVs, including the Zr599 and Liberia strains, on day 28. The secondary end points included the vaccine "take" (major cutaneous reaction) rate, neutralizing titer kinetics against MPXV and vaccinia virus (LC16m8) strains, and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Seroconversion rates on day 28 were 72% (36 of 50), 70% (35 of 50), and 88% (44 of 50) against the Zr599 strain, the Liberia strain, and LC16m8, respectively. On day 168, seroconversion rates decreased to 30% (15 of 50) against the Zr599 and Liberia strains and to 76% (38 of 50) against LC16m8. The vaccine "take" (broad definition) rate on day 14 was 94% (46 of 49). Adverse events (AEs), including common solicited cutaneous reactions, occurred in 98% (45 of 48) of participants; grade 3 severity AEs occurred in 16% (8 of 50). No deaths, serious AEs, or mpox onset incidences were observed up to day 168. CONCLUSIONS: The LC16m8 vaccine generated neutralizing antibody responses against MPXV in healthy adults. No serious safety concerns occurred with LC16m8 use. (Funded by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan; Japan Registry of Clinical Trials number, jRCTs031220171.)

Efficacy and viral dynamics of tecovirimat in patients with MPOX: A multicenter open-label, double-arm trial in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Tecovirimat's application in treating mpox remains under-researched, leaving gaps in clinical and virological understanding. METHODS: The Tecopox study in Japan evaluated the efficacy and safety of tecovirimat in patients with smallpox or mpox, who were divided into oral tecovirimat and control groups. Patients with mpox enrolled between June 28, 2022, and April 30, 2023, were included. Demographic and clinical details along with blood, urine, pharyngeal swab, and skin lesion samples were gathered for viral analysis. A multivariable Tobit regression model was employed to identify factors influencing prolonged viral detection. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were allocated to the tecovirimat group, and no patients were allocated to the control group. The median age was 38.5 years, and all patients were males. Ten patients (52.6%) were infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Sixteen patients (84.2%) had severe disease. Nine of the 15 patients (60.0%) (four patients withdrew before day 14) had negative PCR results for skin lesion specimens 14 days after inclusion. The mortality rates were 0% on days 14 and 30. No severe adverse events were reported. HIV status and the number of days from symptom onset to tecovirimat administration were associated with lower Ct values (p = 0.027 and p < 0.001, respectively). The median number of days when PCR testing did not detect the mpox virus in each patient was 19.5 days. CONCLUSION: Early tecovirimat administration might reduce viral shedding duration, thereby mitigating infection spread. Moreover, patients infected with HIV showed prolonged viral shedding, increasing the transmission risk compared to those without HIV.

Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab vs standard care in patients with severe COVID-19-related pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study utilizing registry data as a synthetic control.

BACKGROUND: The severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections has led to the development of several therapeutic agents, with tocilizumab becoming increasingly used to treat patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia. This study compared the use of tocilizumab treatment with the standard of care (SOC) to determine its efficacy against severe COVID-19-related pneumonia in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab in two different databases: the JA42434 single-arm study and COVID-19 Registry Japan (COVIREGI-JP), with a synthetic control group from the COVIREGI-JP cohort as a benchmark for the tocilizumab group. The study's primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab in treating severe COVID-19-related pneumonia compared to the SOC among patients included in the above two databases. The SOC group was extracted as the synthetic control group using exact matching and a propensity score matching in sequence per subject. As a secondary objective, the efficacy of tocilizumab compared to the SOC was evaluated exclusively among patients included in the COVIREGI-JP database. In each objective, the primary endpoint was defined as the time to discharge or the status of awaiting discharge. RESULTS: For the primary endpoint, the hazard ratio (HR) of the tocilizumab group against the SOC group was 1.070 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.565-2.028). The median time from Study Day 1 to discharge or the state of awaiting discharge was 15 days in the tocilizumab group and 16 days in the SOC group. The HRs for the secondary endpoints, namely, time to improvement in the clinical state, time to clinical failure, and time to recovery, were 1.112 (95% CI: 0.596-2.075), 0.628 (95% CI: 0.202-1.953), and 1.019 (95% CI: 0.555-1.871), respectively. Similarly, the HR of the primary endpoint for the secondary objective was 0.846 (95% CI: 0.582-1.230). CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab did not demonstrate a positive effect on time to discharge or the state of awaiting discharge. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences in other clinical outcomes, such as time to improvement in the clinical state, time to clinical failure, and time to recovery, were observed among the groups.

Efficacy and Safety of Treatment with Plasma from COVID-19-Recovered Individuals.

Convalescent plasma therapy, which involves administering plasma from recovered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients to infected individuals, is being explored as a potential treatment for severe cases of COVID-19. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma therapy in COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe illness. An open-label, single-arm intervention study was conducted without a control group. Plasma collected from recovered COVID-19 patients was administered to eligible participants. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were placed on artificial ventilation or died within 14 days of transfusion. Secondary endpoints included clinical improvement, viral load measurements, and adverse event monitoring. A total of 59 cases were included in the study. The primary endpoint was evaluated by comparing the rate obtained in the study to an existing rate of 25%. The study also assessed clinical improvement, viral load changes, and safety endpoints through adverse event monitoring. Convalescent plasma therapy shows potential as a treatment option for COVID-19. This study aimed to provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of this therapy and may contribute to its future use in treating severe cases of COVID-19.

Trends of participants in convalescent plasma donation for COVID-19 in Japan as the pandemic evolved.

Background: We aimed to investigate chronological changes in the characteristics of participants in a coronavirus disease 2019 convalescent plasma donation study that may benefit optimal collection methods in the future. Methods: Data from a convalescent plasma donation study from April 30, 2020 to November 5, 2021 were collected and analyzed. After August 23, 2021, an interim analysis of factors linked to higher antibody titers led us to restrict our participant recruitment criteria to participants who were within 4 months of disease onset and to patients who were otherwise most likely to have sufficiently high antibody titers. Overall, 1299 samples from 1179 patients were analyzed. Results: Over the duration of the study, 35.9% of the samples were deemed eligible for convalescent plasma collection. The overall eligibility rate initially declined, dipping to <20% after one year. During this period, the proportion of enrolled samples from patients who had severe illness also declined, and the proportion of samples from participants who were >120 days post disease onset increased. After the addition of days from onset and vaccination status to our participant recruitment criteria, the eligibility rate improved significantly. Conclusions: As outbreaks of emerging infectious disease occur, it is desirable to construct and implement a scheme for convalescent plasma donation promptly and to monitor the eligibility rate over time. If it declines, promptly analyze and resolve the associated factors. Additionally, vaccine development and infection prevalence are likely to influence the effective recruitment of participants with high antibody titers.

Effectiveness of cefmetazole versus meropenem for invasive urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli.

Cefmetazole is active against extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBLEC) and is a potential candidate for carbapenem-sparing therapy. This multicenter, observational study included patients hospitalized for invasive urinary tract infection due to ESBLEC between March 2020 and November 2021 at 10 facilities in Japan, for whom either cefmetazole or meropenem was initiated as a definitive therapy within 96 h of culture collection and continued for at least 3 d. Outcomes included clinical and microbiological effectiveness, recurrence within 28 d, and all-cause mortality (14 d, 30 d, in-hospital). Outcomes were adjusted for the inverse probability of propensity scores for receiving cefmetazole or meropenem. Eighty-one and forty-six patients were included in the cefmetazole and meropenem groups, respectively. Bacteremia accounted for 43% of the cefmetazole group, and 59% of the meropenem group. The crude clinical effectiveness, 14 d, 30 d, and in-hospital mortality for patients in the cefmetazole and meropenem groups were 96.1% vs 90.9%, 0% vs 2.3%, 0% vs 12.5%, and 2.6% vs 13.3%, respectively. After propensity score adjustment, clinical effectiveness, the risk of in-hospital mortality, and the risk of recurrence were similar between the two groups (P = 0.54, P = 0.10, and P = 0.79, respectively). In all cases with available data (cefmetazole : n = 61, meropenem : n = 22), both drugs were microbiologically effective. In all isolates, bla CTX-M was detected as the extended-spectrum ß-lactamase gene. The predominant CTX-M subtype was CTX-M-27 (47.6%). Cefmetazole showed clinical and bacteriological effectiveness comparable to meropenem against invasive urinary tract infection due to ESBLECs.

Protocol of Tecopox study: a multicentre, open-label, double-arm trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral tecovirimat therapy for patients with smallpox or monkeypox.

INTRODUCTION: Monkeypox was originally endemic locally in West Africa; however, outbreaks in non-endemic countries have been recognised since May 2022. The effectiveness of tecovirimat has been estimated against smallpox, which belongs to the same Orthopoxvirus genus as monkeypox. Thus, tecovirimat is expected to be effective against monkeypox. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral tecovirimat therapy for patients with smallpox and monkeypox and to prepare a scheme for oral tecovirimat use in Japan. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This nationwide, multicentre, non-randomised, open-label, double-arm study will involve viral examination of the blood, throat swabs, urine and skin lesions, performed periodically. Participants will freely decide whether to participate in an administered group (supportive treatment plus oral tecovirimat) or a non-administered group (only supportive treatment). Tecovirimat will be administered for 14 days. To ensure that financial problems do not preclude participation in the study, the research fund will cover the cost of tecovirimat and basic hospitalisation fees. The primary endpoint is the percentage of patients with negative PCR results (cycle threshold value ≥40) for skin lesion specimens at 14 days after inclusion in the study. Secondary endpoints include mortality at 14 and 30 days, viral load in each sample, duration of fever and adverse events. The sample size is estimated to be 50 patients with monkeypox or smallpox. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. This study was approved by the Certified Review Board of National Center for Global Health and Medicine and published in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and/or in presentations at academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs031220169.

An open-label, non-randomized study investigating the safety and efficacy of smallpox vaccine, LC16, as post-exposure prophylaxis for mpox.

Mpox is an acute exanthematous disease caused by the monkeypox virus. Since May 2022, it has spread as a community-acquired infection, mainly in Europe and the United States, and urgent measures to prevent this infection were also required in Japan. In this study, we investigated the post-exposure prophylaxis of mpox and safety after inoculating the smallpox vaccine. Participants in close contact with patients with mpox were inoculated with "Freeze-dried cell culture Smallpox Vaccine LC16," within 14 days after close contact. Six cases were registered, and all the participants were inoculated. No mpox symptoms or related complications were observed in the participants for 21 days after the close contact. Adverse events due to inoculation, such as rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, and local reaction at the inoculation site (comprising erythema, swelling, induration, and pain) were observed in the participants; however, all inoculation-related events were non-severe and non-serious, and the participants recovered during the 28-day observation period. The findings of this study suggest that inoculation with LC16 is an effective post-exposure prophylaxis in individuals who had close contact with patients with mpox. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Efficacy and Safety of the Smallpox Vaccine for Postexposure Prophylaxis in Monkeypox: Protocol for an Open-Labeled, Single-Armed Study.

BACKGROUND: In May 2022, a case of monkeypox (currently known as "mpox") with no history of overseas travel was reported in the United Kingdom, followed by reports of infections reported in Europe, the United States, and other countries worldwide. Due to the significant overlap in immune responses among viruses of the genus Orthopoxvirus (including smallpox virus, mpox virus, and vaccinia virus), it is believed that cross-immunity can be achieved by administering the smallpox virus vaccine. In Japan, a smallpox vaccine (LC16m8 strain vaccine) has been approved; however, there was no regulatory approval for the mpox vaccine during the design of this study. Although it is believed that individuals exposed to the mpox virus may receive smallpox vaccination as mpox prophylaxis, the existing evidence is not clear. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the LC16m8 strain vaccine, approved for smallpox in Japan, for postexposure prophylaxis against mpox when administered to close contacts of individuals with mpox. The secondary objective was to investigate the safety of the vaccine for postexposure prophylaxis against mpox. METHODS: The study aimed to enroll 100 vaccinated participants who had been identified as close contacts of individuals with mpox. Consent was obtained, and the participants are inoculated with the vaccine. Daily recordings of symptoms (body temperature, headache, rash, and side effects) were made until day 21 and then again on day 28. Furthermore, additional evaluations of adverse events were performed by the investigators on days 7, 14, 21, and 28. Considering that the maximum incubation period for mpox is 21 days, the primary end point is the presence or absence of the disease 21 days after close contact. The primary analysis focused on cases within 4 days of intense contact as it has been reported that vaccination within this timeframe can reduce the incidence of the disease. RESULTS: The first trial participant was enrolled on July 28, 2022, and the research period concluded in March 2023. The study results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. CONCLUSIONS: This study allowed us to investigate the efficacy and safety of the LC16m8 strain vaccine in postexposure prophylaxis against mpox. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs031220137; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031220137. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/46955.

Successful immunosuppressant-free treatment of a drug-induced sarcoidosis-like reaction caused by dupilumab.

We present a case of a drug-induced sarcoidosis-like reaction (DISR) in a 34-year-old female patient who had been receiving dupilumab for eosinophilic rhinosinusitis, for seven months. Computerized tomography scans revealed multiple lymphadenopathies, and biopsies performed on the lung and skin lesions showed the presence of non-caseating granulomas. The patient's serum levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor and angiotensin-converting enzyme were elevated. There were no findings of Mycobacterium spp, or any other bacterial infections. Based on these findings, it was suspected that the sarcoidosis-like reaction observed in this patient was caused by dupilumab. Switching the patient's treatment from dupilumab to mepolizumab improved the DISR.

Association between SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody titers and the development of post-COVID conditions: A retrospective observational study.

The symptoms that persist after an acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are referred to as post- COVID conditions. Although the cause of post-COVID conditions remains unclear, the host immune response to SARS-CoV-2 may be involved. Hence, we aimed to investigate the effect of serum antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 on the development of post-COVID conditions. We conducted a retrospective observational study of COVID-19-recovered individuals who attended the clinic at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine between January 2020 and April 2021. Serum SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody titers were measured and a questionnaire survey was used to collect information on the presence of post-COVID conditions and demographic characteristics of the participants. Participants were then divided into two groups: high peak antibody titer group [≥ 0.759 OD450 value], and low peak antibody titer group [< 0.759 OD450 value] and compared their frequency of post-COVID conditions. Of 526 individuals attending the clinic, 457 (86.9%) responded to the questionnaire. We analyzed the data of 227 (49.7%) participants with measurements of serum antibody titers during the peak period. The incidence of depressed mood was significantly higher in the group with higher antibody titers (odds ratio: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.17-4.67, p = 0.016). There was no significant difference in the frequency of the remaining symptoms between the two groups. Among post-COVID conditions, the depressed mood was more frequent in the group with high serum antibody titers which suggests a difference in pathogenesis between depressive mood and other post-COVID conditions that requires further investigation.

Efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy for COVID-19 in Japan: An open-label, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma is a potential therapeutic option for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Despite its use for treating several viral infections, we lack comprehensive data on its efficacy against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial of convalescent plasma therapy with high neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 in high-risk patients within five days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. The primary endpoint was the time-weighted average change in the SARS-CoV-2 viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs from days 0-5. RESULTS: Between February 24, 2021, and November 30, 2021, 25 patients were randomly assigned to either convalescent plasma (n = 14) or standard of care (n = 11) groups. Four patients discontinued their allocated convalescent plasma, and 21 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The median interval between the symptom onset and plasma administration was 4.5 days (interquartile range, 3-5 days). The primary outcome of the time-weighted average change in the SARS-CoV-2 viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs did not significantly differ between days 0-5 (1.2 log10 copies/mL in the convalescent plasma vs. 1.2 log10 copies/mL in the standard of care (effect estimate, 0.0 [95% confidence interval, -0.8-0.7]; P = 0.94)). No deaths were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The early administration of convalescent plasma with high neutralizing activity did not contribute to a decrease in the viral load within five days compared with the standard of care alone.

Genetic Characteristics of the Virus Detected in the First Mpox Imported Case in Tokyo, Japan.

Mpox, caused by the mpox virus (MPXV), produces symptoms similar to those of smallpox when transmitted to humans. Since 1970, this disease has been endemic, particularly in Africa. However, since May 2022, the number of patients without a history of travel to endemic areas has increased rapidly globally. Under these circumstances, in July 2022, two different real-time PCR methods were used on specimens brought to the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health. MPXV was detected in the skin samples, and it was inferred that the virus was a West African strain. Furthermore, a more detailed analysis of the genetic characteristics of the detected MPXV using next-generation sequencing revealed that the MPXV detected in Tokyo was strain B.1, which corresponds to the same strain that is prevalent in Europe and the USA. This suggests that mpox reported for the first time in Japan was imported and related to outbreaks in Europe and the USA. Therefore, it is necessary to continue monitoring outbreaks in Japan in conjunction with global epidemics.