The GIST of it all: management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) from the first steps to tailored therapy. A bibliometric analysis.

PURPOSE: Improvement of patient care is associated with increasing publication numbers in biomedical research. However, such increasing numbers of publications make it challenging for physicians and scientists to screen and process the literature of their respective fields. In this study, we present a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the evolution of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) research, analyzing the current state of the field and identifying key open questions going beyond the recent advantages for future studies to assess. METHODS: Using the Web of Science Core Collection, 5040 GIST-associated publications in the years 1984-2022 were identified and analyzed regarding key bibliometric variables using the Bibliometrix R package and VOSviewer software. RESULTS: GIST-associated publication numbers substantially increased over time, accentuated from year 2000 onwards, and being characterized by multinational collaborations. The main topic clusters comprise surgical management, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) development/treatment, diagnostic workup, and molecular pathophysiology. Within all main topic clusters, a significant progress is reflected by the literature over the years. This progress ranges from conventional open surgical techniques over minimally invasive, including robotic and endoscopic, resection techniques to increasing identification of specific functional genetic aberrations sensitizing for newly developed TKIs being extensively investigated in clinical studies and implemented in GIST treatment guidelines. However, especially in locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic disease stages, surgery-related questions and certain specific questions concerning (further-line) TKI treatment resistance were infrequently addressed. CONCLUSION: Increasing GIST-related publication numbers reflect a continuous progress in the major topic clusters of the GIST research field. Especially in advanced disease stages, questions related to the interplay between surgical approaches and TKI treatment sensitivity should be addressed in future studies.

A century of retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma research: From single center experience to precision oncology? A bibliometric analysis of past, present, and future perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Increasing publication numbers in the biomedical field led to an improvement of patient care in many aspects but are challenging for scientists when integratively processing data of their fields. Using bibliometric analyses, the present study assesses the productivity and predominant topics in retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma (RPS) research across the past 122 years, thereby identifying crucial questions to address in future RPS research. METHODS: Using the Web of Science Core Collection, 1018 RPS-associated publications from 1900 to 2022 were identified and analyzed regarding key bibliometric variables using the Bibliometrix R package and the VOSviewer software. RESULTS: A continuous increase in RPS-associated publication numbers can be noticed over the time, which is strongly pronounced from 2005 onwards, and is characterized by a multinationally driven collaborative clinical research focus. The research primarily reflects progression regarding surgical techniques, histology-based therapy, radiotherapy regimens, and identification of prognostic clinicopathological factors. This progression is accompanied with improved overall survival of RPS patients. However, a paucity of RPS-specific basic/translational research indicates that such research might be additionally needed to better understand the pathophysiology of RPS and with that to enable the development of personalized therapies and to further improve patient outcome. CONCLUSION: Increasing publication numbers of multinationally driven clinical RPS research are accompanied with improved overall survival of RPS patients, highlighting the importance of international collaborations to facilitate future clinical trials. However, this bibliometric analysis reveals a lack of RPS-specific basic/translational research which is needed to further improve patient outcome in the context of precision oncology.