ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pathologic perivascular spaces (PVS), the fluid-filled compartments surrounding brain vasculature, may underlie cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, whether this impacts specific cognitive domains has not been investigated. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship of PVS volume at baseline with domain-specific and global cognitive change over 2 years in PD individuals. METHODS: A total of 39 individuals with PD underwent 3T T1w magnetic resonance imaging to determine PVS volume fraction (PVS volume normalized to total regional volume) within (i) centrum semiovale, (ii) prefrontal white matter (medial orbitofrontal, rostral middle frontal, and superior frontal), and (iii) basal ganglia. A neuropsychological battery included assessment of cognitive domains and global cognitive function at baseline and after 2 years. RESULTS: Higher basal ganglia PVS at baseline was associated with greater decline in attention, executive function, and global cognition scores. CONCLUSIONS: While previous reports have associated elevated PVS volume in the basal ganglia with decline in global cognition in PD, our findings show such decline may affect the attention and executive function domains.
Subject(s)
Attention , Basal Ganglia , Cognitive Dysfunction , Executive Function , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Parkinson Disease/diagnostic imaging , Parkinson Disease/pathology , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Basal Ganglia/diagnostic imaging , Basal Ganglia/pathology , Basal Ganglia/physiopathology , Executive Function/physiology , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Attention/physiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnostic imaging , Cognitive Dysfunction/pathology , Glymphatic System/diagnostic imaging , Glymphatic System/pathology , Glymphatic System/physiopathology , Neuropsychological Tests , White Matter/diagnostic imaging , White Matter/pathology , White Matter/physiopathologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Difficulties in executive functioning (EF) are common in PD; however, the relationship between subjective and objective EF is unclear. Understanding this relationship could help guide clinical EF assessment. This study examined the relationship between subjective self-reported EF (SEF) and objective EF (OEF) and predictors of SEF-OEF discrepancies in PD. METHOD: One-hundred and sixteen non-demented PD participants completed measures of OEF (i.e. problem-solving, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, and working memory) and SEF (Frontal Systems Behavior Scale-Self Executive Dysfunction Subscale). Pearson bivariate correlations and linear regressions were performed to examine the relationship between SEF and OEF and the non-motor symptoms (e.g. mood, fatigue), demographic, and PD characteristic (e.g. MCI status) predictors of discrepancies between OEF and SEF (|OEF minus SEF scores|). Correlates of under-, over-, and accurate-reporting were also explored. RESULTS: Greater SEF complaints and worse OEF were significantly associated (ß =.200, p = .009) and 64% of participants accurately identified their level of OEF abilities. Fewer years of education and greater symptoms of depression, anxiety, and fatigue significantly correlated with greater discrepancies between OEF and SEF. Fatigue was the best predictor of EF discrepancy in the overall sample (ß = .281, p = .022). Exploratory analyses revealed apathy and fatigue associated with greater under-reporting, while anxiety associated with greater over-reporting. CONCLUSIONS: SEF and OEF are significantly related in PD. Approximately 64% of non-demented persons with PD accurately reported their EF skill level, while 28% under-reported and 8% over-reported. SEF-OEF discrepancies were predicted by fatigue in the overall sample. Preliminary evidence suggests reduced apathy and fatigue symptoms relate to more under-reporting, while anxiety relates to greater over-reporting. Given the prevalence of these non-motor symptoms in PD, it is important to carefully consider them when assessing EF in PD.
Subject(s)
Executive Function , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Executive Function/physiology , Male , Female , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/complications , Aged , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Self Report , Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Fatigue/physiopathology , Fatigue/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Understanding the sequential progression of cognitive impairments in Parkinson's disease (PD) is crucial for elucidating neuropathological underpinnings, refining the assessment of PD-related cognitive decline stages and enhancing early identification for targeted interventions. The first aim of this study was to use an innovative event-based modeling (EBM) analytic approach to estimate the sequence of cognitive declines in PD. The second aim was to validate the EBM by examining associations with EBM-derived individual-specific estimates of cognitive decline severity and performance on independent cognitive screening measures. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included 99 people with PD who completed a neuropsychological battery. Individuals were classified as meeting the criteria for mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) or subtle cognitive decline by consensus. An EBM was constructed to compare cognitively healthy individuals with those with PD-MCI or subtle cognitive disturbances. Multivariable linear regression estimated associations between the EBM-derived stage of cognitive decline and performance on two independent cognitive screening tests. RESULTS: The EBM estimated that tests assessing executive function and visuospatial ability become abnormal early in the sequence of PD-related cognitive decline. Each higher estimated stage of cognitive decline was associated with approximately 0.24 worse performance on the Dementia Rating Scale (p<0.001) and 0.26 worse performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (p<0.001) adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study will have important clinical implications for practitioners, on specific cognitive tests to prioritise, when conducting neuropsychological evaluations with people with PD. Results also highlight the importance of frontal-subcortical system disruption impacting executive and visuospatial abilities.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Identifying factors that moderate cognitive outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is crucial. Prospective memory (PM) is a cognitive domain of interest in mTBI recovery as it may be especially sensitive to TBI-related changes. Since studies show that genetic status - particularly possession of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele - can modify PM performance, we investigated associations between mTBI status and APOE-ε4 genotype on PM performance in a well-characterized sample of Veterans with neurotrauma histories. METHODS: 59 Veterans (mTBI = 33, Military Controls [MCs] = 26; age range: 24-50; average years post-injury = 10.41) underwent a structured clinical interview, neuropsychological assessment, and genotyping. The Memory for Intentions Test (MIST) measured PM across multiple subscales. ANCOVAs, adjusting for age and posttraumatic stress symptoms, tested the effects of mTBI status (mTBI vs. MC) and ε4 status (ε4+ vs. ε4-) on MIST scores. RESULTS: Veterans with mTBI history performed more poorly compared to MCs on the MIST 15-min delay (p=.002, ηp2 =.160), Time Cue (p = .003, ηp2 =.157), and PM Total (p = .016, ηp2 =.102). Those with at least one copy of the ε4 allele performed more poorly compared to ε4- Veterans on the MIST 15-min delay (p = .011, ηp2 =.113) and PM Total (p = .048, ηp2 = .071). No significant interactions were observed between mTBI and APOE-ε4 status on MIST outcomes (ps>.25). Within the mTBI group, APOE-ε4+ Veterans performed worse than APOE-ε4- Veterans on the MIST 15-min delay subscale (p = .031, ηp2 = .150). CONCLUSIONS: mTBI history and APOE-ε4 genotype status were independently associated with worse PM performance compared to those without head injury histories or possession of the APOE-e4 genotype. Performance on the MIST 15-min delay was worse in Veterans with both risk factors (mTBI history and APOE-ε4 positivity). Findings suggest that genetic status may modify outcomes even in relatively young Veterans with mTBI histories. Future research examining longitudinal associations and links to neuroimaging and biomarker data are needed.