The Effect of Yoga on Intraocular Pressure Using the "iCare HOME2" Tonometer.

BACKGROUND: Various yoga positions may have an unfavorable impact on intraocular pressure (IOP) and may therefore be seen as a potential risk factor for the progression of glaucoma. The new "iCare HOME2" is a handheld self-tonometer for IOP measurements outside clinical settings. This is the first study to evaluate the immediate effect of common yoga postures on the IOP of healthy and glaucomatous eyes using the "iCare HOME2" self-tonometer and to compare the time of IOP recovery in both groups. METHODS: This is a single-center, prospective, observational study including 25 healthy and 25 glaucoma patients performing the following yoga positions: "legs up" (Viparita Karani), "bend over" (Uttanasana), "plough pose" (Halasana), and the "down face dog" (Adho Mukha Svanasana) for 90 s each, with a 2-min break in between. IOP was measured with the "iCare HOME2" before, during, and after each position. RESULTS: IOP significantly increased in all eyes in all positions (p < 0.05), showing no statistically significant difference between healthy or glaucomatous eyes (p > 0.05). The mean rise in IOP in healthy subjects was 1.6 mmHg (SD 1.42; p = 0.037), 14.4 mmHg (SD 4.48; p < 0.001), 7.5 mmHg (SD 4.21; p < 0.001), and 16.5 mmHg (SD 3.71; p < 0.001), whereas in glaucoma patients, IOP rose by 2.8 mmHg (SD 2.8; p = 0.017), 11.6 mmHg (SD 3.86; p < 0.001), 6.0 mmHg (SD 2.24; p < 0.001), and 15.1 mmHg (SD 4.44; p < 0.001) during the above listed yoga positions, repsectively. The highest increase in IOP was seen in the down face position, reaching mean IOP values above 31 mmHg in both study groups. IOP elevation was observed immediately after assuming the yoga position, with no significant change during the following 90 s of holding each pose (p > 0.05). All IOP values returned to baseline level in all individuals, with no significant difference between healthy and glaucoma participants. CONCLUSION: Our data show that common yoga positions can lead to an acute IOP elevation of up to 31 mmHg in healthy as well as glaucoma eyes, with higher IOP values during head-down positions. Given that IOP peaks are a major risk factor for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, we generally advise glaucoma patients to carefully choose their yoga exercises. If and to what extent practicing yoga leads to glaucoma progression, however, remains unclear and warrants further research.

Evaluation of Increase in Retinal Thickness as Diagnostic Marker in Central Artery Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the increase in retinal thickness as a marker in predicting the onset of central retinal artery occlusions. METHODS: Retrospective clinical study conducted at one Swiss hospital. Electronic records were filtered for patients with artery occlusions. Optical coherence tomography data, including time between the imaging and ischemic event, were reviewed. Increase in relative retinal thickness was measured, defined as an increase in retinal thickness compared to the unaffected partner eye. This was correlated with the time from symptom onset. A cutoff value of relative increase of < 24.5% was applied, as suggested in previous studies. The results were compared to the time gathered from the electronic records, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value as well as negative predictive value were calculated for predicting an ischemia time of < 4.5 h. RESULTS: Forty-two eyes from 41 patients with central artery occlusions were identified. Fourteen were female. Mean age was 66.4 ± 15.8 years. Initial corrected visual acuity was 2.41 ± 0.68 logMAR, and 2.13 ± 0.87 logMAR at the last follow-up (p > 0.05). Of eyes with a visual acuity of counting fingers (n = 38) or worse, 89.5% showed no improvement during follow-up, while eyes with logMAR 1 or better (n = 4) improved. Thirteen eyes (13 patients) presented within 4.5 h of the ischemic event. Four patients received i. v. thrombolysis, with visual recovery in one. In 12 eyes with an ischemia time of < 4.5 h, relative increase was below 24.5%. In the remaining 29 eyes with > 4.5 h, relative increase was below 24.5% in 4 eyes and above 24.5% in 25 eyes. This yielded a sensitivity of 92.3%, a specificity of 86.2%, with a positive predictive value of 75.0% and a negative predictive value of 96.2%. CONCLUSION: Central retinal artery occlusion is associated with severe vision loss. There is no current established therapy. Parameters that objectify the presence of a therapeutic window for thrombolysis are gaining in importance as patient history is often imprecise. Relative retinal thickness increase proved a noninvasive imaging parameter demonstrating adequate performance in detecting patients within the therapeutic window of thrombolysis. Further investigation of this parameter in central retinal occlusion is warranted.

Ophthalmological Outcomes in Patients with Susac Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: To report ophthalmological outcomes and treatment regimen in patients with Susac syndrome. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with Susac syndrome treated between November 2015 and March 2023. Multimodal imaging findings, ophthalmic examination data, information on neurological and sensorineural involvement, and therapeutic regimen were reviewed. Visual acuity was recorded as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Ophthalmological manifestations and disease severity were assessed using the previously described clinical activity score (CAS). RESULTS: Ten patients with Susac syndrome m : f = 5 : 5 were identified. The mean follow-up time was 31.2 ± 23.3 months (range 1 to 78 months). The mean age was 41.4 ± 13.8 years (range 21 to 59 years). At baseline, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.03 ± 0.08 logMAR. At the last follow-up, CDVA improved to 0.00 ± 0.03 logMAR (p = 0.029). Three of 20 eyes showed an improvement of 5 letters, while no loss of visual acuity was recorded during the follow-up time. Baseline CAS was 10.65 ± 12.69, and CAS at the last follow-up was 5.15 ± 5.49 (p = 0.068). Except for one patient, all were initially treated with intravenous (i. v.) steroids and subsequent oral tapering. Depending on the treatment response, cyclophosphamide (n = 4), i. v. immunoglobulins (IVIGs) (n = 4), anti-CD20 antibodies (n = 3), or plasmapheresis (n = 1) were applied. All patients under treatment for more than 1 month (n = 9) showed improvement in CAS and CDVA. CONCLUSION: Susac syndrome is a rare autoimmune vascular endotheliopathy. Treatment of Susac syndrome appears to result in improving CAS and CDVA. The majority of patients, in addition to the systemic steroids, required systemic immunosuppressive agents. Interdisciplinary communication is crucial to reduce the time to diagnosis and initiation of therapy in patients with Susac syndrome.

Intraocular Pressure in Eyes with Intraocular Lens Dislocation and Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To investigate intraocular pressure in eyes with intraocular lens subluxation and pseudoexfoliation syndrome. METHODS: In this retrospective study conducted at one eye centre (tazz) in Zurich, Switzerland, we reviewed 85 eyes with intraocular lens subluxation and pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Intraocular lens exchange was carried out by two surgeons between 03/2016 and 12/2019 (45 months). Information on baseline characteristics and diagnosis of glaucoma was recorded. Intraocular pressure and best-corrected visual acuity were analysed preoperatively and at five time points up to 12 months after lens exchange. Data on antiglaucomatous medication was collected before surgery and at two different time points after surgery. Postoperative pressure lowering procedures and complications were further analysed. RESULTS: This study includes 85 pseudoexfoliation eyes with intraocular lens subluxation. The mean interval between cataract surgery and lens exchange was 8.9 ± 5.2 years. Intraocular pressure elevation in the event of intraocular lens subluxation was found in 54% (46/85) of eyes. Mean intraocular pressure decreased from 22.9 ± 9.4 mmHg preoperatively to 15.2 ± 3.4 mmHg at follow-up 12 months after lens exchange (p < 0.001). Postoperative topical antiglaucomatous drug requirements were comparable to preoperative levels (p = 0.520). Less systemic acetazolamide was required 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.018). A pressure lowering procedure was required in seven (8%) eyes in the postoperative period due to persistence of high intraocular pressure. Intermittent increase or persistence of high intraocular pressure occurred in 13 (15%) eyes. CONCLUSION: This study emphasises the connection between acute pressure elevation and intraocular lens subluxation in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Intraocular pressure decreases after lens exchange and decrease sustains for a postoperative period of 12 months. Postoperative pressure lowering procedures were not required in the majority of eyes. We therefore conclude that intraocular lens exchange is efficient in the management of lens subluxation and pressure elevation in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome.

Two Surgical Approaches for Intraocular Lens Dislocation: Pars Plana Vitrectomy Versus Core Vitrectomy with Lens Exchange.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of core vitrectomy and pars plana vitrectomy for lens exchange in patients with intraocular lens dislocation. METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted at one eye center in Zurich, Switzerland. We reviewed 124 eyes with dislocated intraocular lens undergoing lens exchange carried out by two surgeons between 03/2016 and 12/2019 (45 months). Intraocular pressure (IOP) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were analyzed preoperatively and at 5 time points up to 12 months after lens exchange. Data on postoperative complications were collected. RESULTS: There were 124 eyes with intraocular lens dislocation that were referred for lens exchange. Of these eyes, 59 (48%) received core vitrectomy and 65 (52%) received pars plana vitrectomy with lens exchange. Glaucoma was more frequent in the core vitrectomy group (78%) than in the pars plana vitrectomy group (32%; p < 0.001). In the core vitrectomy group, 19 (32%) eyes presented with visual impairment, 17 (29%) eyes presented with high IOP alone, and 23 (39%) eyes presented with both at the same time prior to surgery. Mean preoperative IOP in the core vitrectomy group decreased from 22.4 ± 9.2 mmHg to 14.7 ± 3.1 mmHg 12 months after surgery (p < 0.001). Mean BCVA changed from 0.40 ± 0.41 logMAR preoperatively to 0.32 ± 0.37 logMAR at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.598) in the core vitrectomy group. In the pars plana vitrectomy group, 44 (68%) eyes presented with a change in vision, 7 (11%) eyes presented with high IOP alone, and 14 (22%) eyes presented with pressure elevation and visual impairment at the visit prior to surgery. Mean preoperative IOP in the pars plana vitrectomy group decreased from 20.9 ± 8.3 mmHg to 15.1 ± 3.5 mmHg at 12 months after lens exchange (p < 0.001). Mean BCVA in the pars plana vitrectomy group was 0.57 ± 0.62 logMAR preoperatively and 0.22 ± 0.35 logMAR 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). Postoperative pressure decompensation occurred more frequently in the core vitrectomy group (20%) than in the pars plana vitrectomy group (6%; p = 0.018). There was no statistically significant difference for postoperative cystoid macular edema (p = 0.055), anisometropia (p = 0.986), and high astigmatism (p = 0.362). CONCLUSION: Core vitrectomy and pars plana vitrectomy with lens exchange are equally efficient and safe in the management of intraocular lens dislocation.