Technical considerations for isolated limb perfusion: A consensus paper.

BACKGROUND: Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a well-established surgical procedure for the administration of high dose chemotherapy to a limb for the treatment of advanced extremity malignancy. Although the technique of ILP was first described over 60 years ago, ILP is utilised in relatively few specialist centres, co-located with tertiary or quaternary cancer centres. The combination of high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy and the cytokine tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), mandates leakage monitoring to prevent potentially serious systemic toxicity. Since the procedure is performed at relatively few specialist centres, an ILP working group was formed with the aim of producing technical consensus guidelines for the procedure to streamline practice and to provide guidance for new centres commencing the technique. METHODS: Between October 2021 and October 2023 a series of face to face online and hybrid meetings were held in which a modified Delphi process was used to develop a unified consensus document. After each meeting the document was modified and recirculated and then rediscussed at subsequent meeting until a greater than 90% consensus was achieved in all recommendations. RESULTS: The completed consensus document comprised 23 topics in which greater than 90% consensus was achieved, with 83% of recommendations having 100% consensus across all members of the working group. The consensus recommendations covered all areas of the surgical procedure including pre-operative assessment, drug dosing and administration, perfusion parameters, hyperthermia, leakage monitoring and theatre logistics, practical surgical strategies and also post-operative care, response evaluation and staff training. CONCLUSION: We present the first joint expert-based consensus statement with respect to the technical aspects of ILP that can serve as a reference point for both existing and new centres in providing ILP.

Major vascular reconstruction in colorectal adenocarcinoma and retroperitoneal sarcoma: A retrospective study of safety and margins in a tertiary referral centre.

BACKGROUND: The role of en bloc vascular resection and reconstruction (EVRR) is controversial in colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), but well-established in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Sparse data exists regarding these complex procedures. METHODS: Patients undergoing curative intent EVRR for advanced CRC and RPS between 2014 and 2021 at a tertiary centre were included. Morbidity, margins, recurrence, and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: 24 patients underwent EVRR with 48 reconstructions (11 CRC and 13 RPS). For CRC, 100% of patients underwent Iliac system reconstructions. For RPS, inferior vena cava reconstructions were the most common (69.2%). There were 2 arterial and 1 venous graft thromboses. Primary graft patency was 89.4% arterial and 93.1% venous, while secondary patency was 100% arterial and 96.5% venous at last follow up. 1 venous and 1 arterial graft required reoperation for bleeding. There were no compromised limbs. Major complications occurred in 6 patients (25.0%) with no observed difference between CRC and RPS (OR 0.43 95%CI[0.60,3.19], P = 0.41). R1 margins occurred 1 CRC (90.9%) and 3 RPS (76.9%), with no R2 resections. All vascular resection margins were clear. There were 6 CRC (50%) and 4 RPS (33.3%) recurrences. Median recurrence time was 20.9 months for CRC and 'not yet reached' for RPS. Median follow-up was 19.4 months for CRC and 21.4 months for RPS. CONCLUSION: EVRR for locally advanced CRC or RPS is safe and achieves favorable R0 resection rates. CRC patients with major vascular invasion can still be considered for curative intent surgery. Larger cohorts with longer follow up are needed to assess oncologic outcomes.

Primary iliocaval leiomyosarcomas: The path beyond surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Iliocaval leiomyosarcoma (ICLM) is a rare and aggressive form of sarcoma within the retroperitoneum. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment, with no consensus on the benefit of chemoradiotherapy in the neo/adjuvant setting. This study aims to describe the natural history of a chemotherapy-naïve ICLM treated in a tertiary cancer centre and to explore potential directions to improve oncological outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective database was used to identify patient demographics, clinicopathological variables and oncological outcomes in 30 patients who underwent surgical resection in our institution for primary non-metastatic ICLM between 2003 and 2018. RESULTS: There was no 90-day mortality. With a median follow-up time of 70.0 months (95% CI 52.6-87.4), 5/30 patients (16.7%) developed local recurrence while 11/30 (36.7%) developed distant metastatic disease. 1 patient (3.3%) developed both local and distant recurrence. Median overall survival of our cohort was 41.0 months (95% CI 33.6-48.4) and 5-year overall survival rate was 32.1%. Multivariate survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model identified tumour grade and blood loss of more than 600 mL as key prognostic factors in our model. CONCLUSION: Management of ICLM should be centralised in high-volume sarcoma centres with expertise in the management of retroperitoneal sarcomas. Integration of tumour biology with a concerted effort to conduct conclusive multi-centre phase III in histological and molecularly defined sarcoma subgroups is necessary to improve patient outcome. We eagerly await the results of STRASS 2 study to gain more insights to the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on patient prognosis.

Treatment of patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: predictors of outcome from an Australian specialist sarcoma centre.

BACKGROUND: Several unanswered questions surround the management of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Guidelines recommend treatment by a multidisciplinary team at a specialized referral centre. The objective of this study was to describe the management of RPS at an Australian specialist sarcoma centre, comparing outcomes to international standards and analysing for predictors of local failure. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed on patients with RPS treated between 2008 and 2016. A 5-year outcome analyses focussed on patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for primary, non-metastatic RPS. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients underwent surgery for primary RPS. Five-year overall survival was 66%, 5-year freedom from local recurrence was 65% and 5-year freedom from distant metastasis was 71%. Overall survival was associated with tumour grade (hazard ratio (HR) 6.1, P < 0.001) and histologic organ invasion (HR 5.7, P < 0.001). Variables associated with improved freedom from local recurrence were macroscopically complete resection (HR 0.14, P < 0.001) and neoadjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.33, P = 0.014). Treatment at a specialist sarcoma centre was associated with a higher rate of preoperative biopsy and neoadjuvant radiotherapy (both with P < 0.001). There was a trend towards improved local control for patients undergoing surgery at a specialist centre (P = 0.055). CONCLUSION: This is the largest Australian series of RPS and outcomes are comparable to major international sarcoma centres. Patients treated at a specialist centre had higher rates of preoperative diagnosis and tailored therapy which was associated with improved outcomes. Patients with suspected RPS should be referred to a specialist centre for optimal preoperative evaluation and multidisciplinary management.

Incidental Metastatic Melanoma Identified on 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT for Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

A 78-year-old man with a history of surgically treated prostate cancer and melanoma underwent Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT for biochemical recurrence of his prostate cancer. This revealed locoregionally recurrent prostate cancer and a separate PSMA-avid nodule in his left arm. Subsequent F-FDG PET/CT and excision confirmed this to be an in-transit melanoma metastasis. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT has become a widely used and valuable tool in the assessment of prostate cancer, particularly biochemically recurrent. Uptake of PSMA has been described in a multitude of different benign and malignant conditions, but it has only rarely been documented in melanoma.

Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy; A randomized controlled equivalence trial.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to compare operative peritoneal irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy in adult patients; our hypothesis was that the two methods are equivalent in terms of rate of post-operative intra-abdominal abscess. There has been only one prospective, randomized, superiority trial in children, that showed non-significant difference in the rate of intra-abdominal abscess comparing irrigation to suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Non-significant difference in a superiority trial does not imply equivalence. METHODS: This was a single-institution, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence study based on a null-hypothesis of non-equivalence between irrigation and suction alone. Adult patients with intra-operative findings of an acutely inflamed appendix, with suppuration or perforation localized to the right iliac fossa, paracolic gutter or pelvis were randomized to irrigation or suction alone. The primary endpoint was the rate of intra-abdominal abscess. An unconditional exact test of equivalence was used to test the null-hypothesis. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included for analysis. Two (5%) of 40 patients in the irrigation group and two (4.9%) of 41 in the suction-only group developed postoperative intra-abdominal abscess. The 95% confidence interval for the difference between the two groups was -0.1200 to 0.1244, captured within the pre-defined δ limits (-0.15, 0.15). With reference to the rate of intra-abdominal abscess, equivalence was demonstrated between irrigation and suction-only techniques. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suppurative or perforated appendicitis, the rate of intra-abdominal abscess is equivalent between groups treated with peritoneal irrigation and suction alone.

Consent, capacity and the right to say no.

Competence is a key component in patient consent, whether agreeing to or refusing a treatment. The law surrounding competence can be difficult to understand and interpret. We present a complex case involving a woman refusing life-saving surgical treatment. Initially considered competent by doctors, she was then deemed incompetent by a neuropsychologist, resulting in surgery against her instructions. This raised several questions regarding the notion of competence and the methods by which it is assessed and applied. We outline the legal definitions of competence: that a patient needs to understand, retain and believe the information about the treatment options; be able to weigh the information to reach a decision; and be able to communicate that decision. The assessment of competence is often complex. We discuss the medicolegal issues raised and the legal tests that need to be addressed by clinicians involved in that assessment. Finally, we present the resources and methods available to doctors confronted with difficult or complicated scenarios involving patient competence.