Role and Results of Constrained Insert in Computer-Assisted Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Matched Study.

Purpose: Mild ligament imbalance is often encountered in the mediolateral plane during complex primary total knee arthroplasty. A constrained (CP) polyethylene insert compatible with the primary femur is useful to manage these cases without the need to fall back on revision implants. The aim of the study was to define the correct indications of the use of a CP insert based on objective data from computer assisted surgery and to compare the early results of a CP insert with a standard posterior stabilized (PS) insert through one-to-one propensity score matching. Methods: This is a retrospective case study from a prospectively collected database. One-to-one matching without replacement was used with a caliper width of 0.2 to match the scores between CP (N = 64) and PS groups (N = 1624), resulting in equal covariate matching of PS (N = 64) and CP (N = 64) cohorts. Patients were assessed radiographically and functionally at a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Result: Average coronal and sagittal plane deformities were similar in both the group CP (varus 13.1 ± 5.2 valgus 13 ± 7.9) and the group PS (varus 13.4 ± 4.6 valgus 10.9 ± 8.6). The average residual medial lateral gap difference was significantly higher in group CP (3.8 ± 1.8) in comparison to group PS (1.3 ± 1) (P < .05). A CP insert was chosen where mild ligament imbalance of 3-5 mm persisted after medial soft tissue releases in a varus knee and in cases with residual medial collateral ligament laxity in valgus knees. Conclusions: Constrained insert used with the primary femoral component is a valuable option to handle mild ligamentous instability in complex primary total knee arthroplasty after mechanical alignment is achieved with computer navigation. Level of Evidence: III.

The "Wind Surf" Deformity-Correcting Fixed Flexion Deformity and Hyperextension in Bilateral CAS TKA.

Severe knee arthritis can result in complex coronal and sagittal angular deformities. Windswept deformity is used to describe a varus deformity and contralateral valgus deformity. We recognized a new sagittal pattern at the time of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in which one knee has a fixed flexion deformity (FFD), while the contralateral knee has a hyperextension deformity. We propose to define it as "wind surf" deformity mimicking the opposite pull of the wind and a surfer. The incidence of "wind surf" deformity in this series was 0.96% among a cohort of 2,291 bilateral TKAs performed between 2013 and 2018. Twenty-two patients were identified with an FFD of 5° to 20° on one knee and recurvatum of -5° to -20° on the contralateral knee. Additional bone resection and soft-tissue releases were performed for the FFD with a goal to maintain residual 1° to 3° of flexion. Minimal bone resection and soft-tissue disruption were performed on the knee with hyperextension with a goal to maintain 5° to 7° of flexion. These opposite strategies applied with the help of CAS prevented recurrence resulting in satisfactory clinical results at 2-year follow-up. The "wind surf" deformity variant should be identified in patients presenting with severe knee arthritis to guide surgical treatment, prevent recurrence, and obtain favorable clinical patient outcomes.

Subvastus Exposure Compared to Parapatellar Approach in Navigated Sequential Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (SBTKA): A Prospective Randomized Study.

Subvastus approach preserves the quadriceps mechanism and may lead to improved early functional outcomes as compared with a parapatellar approach in primary knee arthroplasty. We performed a prospective randomized study to test the hypothesis if subvastus approach improves patient- and physician-reported outcomes in navigated sequential bilateral knee arthroplasty when compared with the standard parapatellar approach. A total of 93 patients were allotted in each group after power analysis and randomization done by computer-generated sequence: group S by subvastus approach and control group P by parapatellar approach. The patient's ability to walk without an aid, range of motion, blood loss, tourniquet time, complications, Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), High Flexion Knee Score (HFKS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. Final follow-up was done at 2 years. There was no statistical difference in the patient's ability to achieve a straight leg raise (p = 0.88), walk without an aid (p = 0.25), leaving pain medication (p = 0.48), and mean duration of hospital stay (p = 0.58) between both groups. There was no difference in KSS, FS, KOOS, WOMAC, HFKS, and VAS at 2 weeks and later follow-ups. There was no significant difference in range of motion or lateral retinacular release in both groups. Blood loss was significantly less in group S (p < 0.05), but there was a higher rate of proximal wound dehiscence and delayed healing in subvastus group (p = 0.03). Subvastus approach does not improve patient- and physician-reported outcome measures except blood loss in computer-navigated sequential bilateral knee arthroplasty and has an increased incidence of wound healing problems. The Level of evidence for the study is I.

Do spacer blocks accurately estimate deformity correction and gap balance in total knee arthroplasty? A prospective study with computer navigation.

BACKGROUND: Spacer blocks are used commonly in knee arthroplasty to estimate gaps and ligament balance. Their use continues along with modern technology despite dearth of literature regarding their accuracy and reliability. This prospective study aims to determine the difference in values of gap and balance measurements between spacers and trials in computer assisted TKA. METHODS: 50 patients with moderate varus deformity of <20° undergoing primary TKA were recruited for this prospective study. After navigation assisted cuts and requisite ligament release, gaps and balance were recorded in extension and 90° flexion with spacer block followed by implant trials. RESULTS: There were 33 females and 17 males with average BMI of 28.2 ±â€¯5kg/m2. The average preoperative flexion deformity was 6.5°â€¯±â€¯4.4° and varus deformity was 8.2°â€¯±â€¯3.8°. Average difference of deformity in sagittal plane in extension between spacer and trial was 6.2° which was statistically significant (p = 0.001) implying that knee achieves more extension with spacer blocks as compared to trials because the blocks do not have posterior offset of the condyles. However, there was no difference between values of soft tissue balance and coronal plane correction between spacer blocks and trials in extension and 90° flexion (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Spacer blocks do not estimate extension space accurately with knee achieving 6.2 more flexion with trials as compared to spacer blocks when assessed for sagittal plane correction in extension. Spacer blocks should pass in easily in extension to avoid any flexion deformity when the actual trials are inserted.