ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic appendectomy has become more popular compared with the open appendectomy in children, but there are limited data on the effects of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on cerebral oxygenation. This study was designed to evaluate the changes in cerebral saturation using near-infrared spectroscope during laparoscopic surgery in children. METHODS: The children underwent laparoscopic (LAP Group, n=22) or open appendectomy (OPEN Group, n=22). Right and left cerebral oxygenation (RScO2-LScO2), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), end-tidal CO2pressure (PETCO2), and peripheral oxygen saturations (SpO2) were recorded between anesthesia induction (T0, baseline), after induction (T1), after intubation (T2), 5 minutes after intubation (T3), 5 minutes after pneumoperitoneum-15th minute at OPEN (T4), 5 minutes after Trendelenburg-20th minute at OPEN (T5), 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum-45th minute at OPEN (T6), 5 minutes after supine position-skin suturing at OPEN (T7), 5 minutes postextubation (T8). RESULTS: Groups were similar with respect to their demographic data. In LAP group, a significant increase in HR was recorded at T5. No significant difference was observed in the MAP, PETCO2, SpO2, RScO2, and LScO2 values between the groups. There was a significant increase in the perioperative T1 to T8 values compared with the T0 values in LScO2 of the LAP group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position does not alter the hemodynamic values and can be safely performed in children without altering regional brain oxygenation levels.
Subject(s)
Brain Chemistry/physiology , Head-Down Tilt/physiology , Laparoscopy , Oxygen/blood , Adolescent , Appendectomy/methods , Blood Pressure/physiology , Carbon Dioxide/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Heart Rate/physiology , Humans , Insufflation/methods , Intraoperative Care , Male , Monitoring, Intraoperative , Operative Time , Pneumoperitoneum, ArtificialABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Otoacoustic emission (OAE) tests are important evaluation tools for diagnosis of peripheral auditory pathology. Sedation or general anesthesia may be required for the performance of the OAE tests. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the effects of anesthetic agents, propofol and ketamine, on OAEs in children. METHODS: Fifty healthy children who underwent tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy under general anesthesia were included in this study. Three anesthesia induction protocols were defined for this study and the anesthesiologist applied his or her own choice. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were automatically recorded in both ears of each patient prior to anesthetic (predrug) and following the loss of consciousness 5 min later (postdrug) by an audiologist blinded to the method of anesthesia. Acceptable TEOAEs were defined as signal noise ratio (S/N) of above 3 dB SPL (decibel sound pressure level) and DPOAEs of 6 dB SPL or above. Between-group and within-group comparisons and correlations were performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Retrospective review of the anesthesia charts from 44 cases that completed the study showed that propofol, ketamine, and sevoflurane induction protocols were used in 21, 18, and 5 cases, respectively. Measurements of 36 ears in the propofol group and 34 ears in the ketamine group were included in the final analysis. Postdrug TEOAE and DPOAE amplitudes were significantly lower than predrug amplitudes except at 8 kHz in the ketamine group. There was no significant statistical difference in postdrug DPOAE measurements between propofol and ketamine groups but a significant difference was observed at 2 and 3 kHz of postdrug TEOAE measurements. TEOAE measurements were below 3 dB in 8 of 34 ears after ketamine and in 1 of 36 ears after propofol administration. There was a significant difference between the groups with respect to the incidence of successful measurements of TEOAEs. The DPOAE measurements were affected less by these drugs. CONCLUSION: DPOAE measurements were reduced similarly by propofol and ketamine anesthesia. Lower false outcome ratio in TEOAE measurements made propofol a better option than ketamine.