Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone in early breast cancer is an established standard of care. However, the same results have not been replicated in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We aim to examine the feasibility of SLNB in LABC patients post NACT to determine identification rates (IR) and false negative rates (FNR). This was a single tertiary cancer center-based prospective study from February 2017 to November 2018. Forty-four patients with LABC (T3, T4 with N0 or N1) were studied and response after NACT was assessed. Only those patients who were N0 or who converted from N1 to N0 after NACT were included. Those patients who remained node positive after NACT directly proceeded with axillary dissection without SLNB and were excluded from the study. Demographic and clinical data is expressed in ratios and percentage and presented in table format. The median age at the time of study was 45.18 years. Most of the patients had T3 and above (97.7%) and N1 (86.3%) disease at the start of neoadjuvant therapy. The mean number of axillary lymph nodes dissected was 13.97. Dual method of sentinel lymph node mapping (methylene blue dye and radiolabeled colloid) was used in 26 (59.1%) patients. At least 1 SLN was identified in 86.4% patients with 100% identification in those patients in whom the dual method of SLN mapping was used. Median of 2 SLN was removed. Overall, false negative rate was 21.4%. FNR was high with the single method of SLN mapping (50% and 33.3% with methylene blue and radioactive colloid respectively) while it was considerably low when both were used simultaneously (11%). An average of 2 (range 0-4) SLN were identified and FNR were zero when 2 or more SLN were identified. Our study shows that SLNB in patients with LABC post NACT though viable cannot be recommended at present due to unacceptable high FNR. However, this should not dissuade us from exploring recurrence-free survival and overall survival associated with such IR and FNR albeit strictly under a clinical trial setting.
Sarcomatoid carcinoma or carcinosarcoma of the penis is a rare entity with 36 cases reported in the literature. A 61-year-old male presented with swelling in the glans and shaft of the penis with bilateral inguinal lymph node metastases. He underwent total penectomy with bilateral inguinal block dissection. Histopathology revealed sarcomatoid carcinoma of the Penis with bilateral inguinal lymph node metastases. The patient later developed bilateral lung metastases in 6 months and was succumbed to death. Sarcomatoid carcinoma or carcinosarcoma is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis.
A germ-cell tumour (GCT) of the testis is a chemosensitive tumour with high cure rates even in advanced disease. Radical inguinal orchiectomy is the initial procedure used to diagnose it which helps to risk-stratify these patients. However, in patients with life-threatening metastases, primary chemotherapy was attempted in a few studies, followed by delayed orchiectomy. The aim of this review is to study the histopathological findings of delayed orchiectomy and the retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) specimens, to assess difference and concordance in response rates in histological types of GCTs in pathological specimens. Overall, 352 patients received initial chemotherapy followed by orchiectomy, and 235 of them had undergone RPLND. Delayed orchiectomy specimens had viable tumour in 74 (21%) patients, scarring/necrosis in 171 patients (48.5%), and teratoma in 107 (30.3%) patients. RPLND specimens had residual disease in 36 (15.3%) patients, scarring/necrosis in 100 patients (42.5%), and teratoma in 99 patients (42.3%). Patients with seminoma who underwent delayed orchiectomy had complete disappearance of tumour in 81.3% of cases, and in non-seminomatous GCT, it was 43.4%. These results raise the question of the existence of a blood-testis barrier in patients with advanced GCT and argue against the testis as a sanctuary site.
INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer screening programmes are based on various risk models to assess the risk of breast cancer in the general population. The aim of the present study is to predict the efficacy of the Gail model (GM) in the Indian population. We did a retrospective calculation of the Gail score from the hospital records of patients with breast cancer and benign breast disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Gail score was calculated in three groups. The three groups were made up of 104 patients with confirmed breast cancer (Group A), 100 patients with confirmed benign breast diseases (Group B), and 100 patient attendants (Group C). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data analysis was done using SPSS 15.0, Medcal 9.0.1. RESULTS: The median Gail score in the three groups of patients was 7.5±3.04 in patients with breast cancer, 8.2±1.4 in patients with benign breast diseases, and 7.8±1.7 in normal people. The median Gail score was lower in patients with breast cancer when compared with normal people. CONCLUSION: The GM is not useful in identifying the risk of breast cancer in Indian women. There is a need for further studies to evaluate other genetic and environmental factors to create an appropriate model for the Indian population.
