A multi-center cross-sectional comparison of parent-reported quality of life and bowel function between anorectal malformation and Hirschsprung's disease patients with versus those without Down syndrome.

PURPOSE: Down syndrome (DS) is a common abnormality associated with anorectal malformation (ARM) and Hirschsprung's disease (HD). However, quality of life (QOL) in ARM and HD patients with DS is under-researched. This study compares parent-reported QOL and bowel function in ARM and HD patients with DS to those without. METHODS: Between December 2020 to February 2023, parents of ARM and HD patients with and without DS aged 3-17 years who had undergone surgery > 12 months prior at four tertiary referral centers were recruited. We used the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) Generic Core Scales, General Well-Being (GWB) Scale and Family Impact (FI) Module questionnaires, and the Rintala bowel function score (BFS). RESULTS: There were 101 ARM, 9 (8.9%) of whom had DS; and 87 HD, of whom 6 (6.9%) had DS. Parent-reported Core scores in ARM and HD with DS were comparable to those without DS. However, ARM and HD with DS had worse scores in the FI Module and bowel function than those without DS. CONCLUSION: Although parent-reported QOL in ARM and HD with DS is similar to those without DS, family impact and BFS are worse. Our findings are limited by small sample size in proportion of DS patients.

Experiences of youth growing up with anorectal malformation or Hirschsprung's disease: a multicenter qualitative in-depth interview study.

PURPOSE: Patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) and Hirschsprung's disease (HD) live with long-term impact of these diseases even into adulthood. We aimed to explore the physical, social and emotional impact of these diseases in adolescents and young adults to develop best practices for transition care. METHODS: We conducted one-on-one in-depth interviews with ARM and HD patients aged ≥ 11 years who had undergone surgery at four tertiary referral centers. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. We analyzed transcripts for recurring themes, and data were collected until data saturation was reached. Three researchers independently coded the transcripts for major themes using thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: We interviewed 16 participants (11 males) between October 2022 and April 2023. Ages ranged from 11 to 26 years. Five major themes emerged: (1) personal impact (subthemes: physical, emotional and mental health, social, school), (2) impact on family, (3) perceptions of their future (subthemes: relationships, career, state of health), (4) sources of support (subthemes: family, peers, partner), and (5) transition care (subthemes: concerns, expectations). Only females expressed concerns regarding future fertility. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the evolving problems faced by adolescents and young adults with ARM and HD, especially gender-specific concerns. Our findings can inform efforts to provide individualized care.

Identifying Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Stoma Closure in Infants for Targeted Implementation of Surgical Site Infection Reduction Bundle.

Background: To determine risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) in infants after stoma closure, to identify at-risk patients, plan timing of surgery, and implement SSI-reduction strategies. Patients and Methods: A single center retrospective comparison study of all children less than one year of age who underwent enterostomy closure (2018-2020) with SSI diagnosed through a prospective surveillance program, using criteria from Public Health England (PHE). Demographics and risk factors, types of SSI, systemic sepsis, mortality and length of stay were compared between SSI and non-SSI. Significant factors associated with SSI were analyzed in a multivariate binomial logistic regression model. Results: Eighty-nine stoma closures were performed, most commonly for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and anorectal malformation. Fourteen had SSI (16%): 12 superficial and two deep; three developed systemic sepsis, but no 30-day mortality. Surgical site infection was associated with NEC (12/14 vs. 32/75; p = 0.003), younger age (median 76 vs. 89 days; p = 0.014), lower corrected gestation (cutoff: 39 weeks gestation; 11/14 vs. 27/75; p = 0.004) and lower weight (cutoff: 2.2 kg; 7/14 vs. 16/75; p = 0.032), compared with non-SSI. After correcting for age, gestation, and weight, logistic regression showed NEC was an independent predictor for SSI (odds ratio [OR], 12; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.2-125). The at-risk cohort (n = 56; 63%) had seven-fold increased risk of SSI and four-fold longer hospital stay, which may be the target for SSI-reduction strategies. Conclusions: Necrotizing enterocolitis-related stoma closure is at increased risk for SSI. Considerations for delaying stoma closure until achieving 39 weeks gestation or 2.2 kg in weight may further reduce SSI. Targeting SSI-reduction strategies using these criteria may improve resource-rationalization.

Comparing Consistency and Usability of Common Bowel Function Scoring Systems in Anorectal Malformation Patients.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of postoperative bowel function in anorectal malformation (ARM) patients is crucial for benchmarking outcomes. We compared existing bowel function scoring systems in various aspects in patients with ARM. METHODS: With ethical approval, this was a cross-sectional study involving 5 paediatric surgery referral centres in Malaysia, comparing the Kelly, Japanese Study Group of Anorectal Anomalies (JSGA), Holschneider and Krickenbeck bowel function questionnaires. We recruited patients aged 4-17 years, who had completed definitive surgery & stoma closure (where relevant) > 12 months prior to participation. We standardised outcomes of each scoring system into categories ('good', 'fair', 'poor' and 'very poor') to facilitate comparison. Parents & patients were surveyed and asked to rate the ease of understanding of each questionnaire. The difference in protocol scores rated between parents and patients were compared. Association of each bowel function scoring protocol with type of anomaly was assessed. Statistical significance was p < 0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-nine parents (21 mothers, 18 fathers) and 23 patients were included in this study. Fair agreement was found between Kelly and Krickenbeck protocols (κ = 0.343; p < 0.001), between JSGA constipation and Holschneider protocols (κ = 0.276; p = 0.002); JSGA constipation and Krickenbeck protocols (κ = 0.256; p = 0.004); and between Holschneider and Krickenbeck protocols (κ = 0.273; p = 0.003). Only the Kelly protocol showed significant correlation between parents and patients' answers (ρ = 0.459, p = 0.028). Krickenbeck demonstrated the best negative correlation of patients' scores with ARM types (ρ = -0.401, p = 0.001). The Kelly protocol ranked highest when comparing ease of understanding. CONCLUSION: All the questionnaires appeared comparable in assessing postoperative faecal continence in ARM patients. The Kelly questionnaire performed best in 3 key areas of assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Cross-Sectional Study.