Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cell Rep ; 43(8): 114566, 2024 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39088320

ABSTRACT

Novel insecticides were recently introduced to counter pyrethroid resistance threats in African malaria vectors. To prolong their effectiveness, potential cross-resistance from promiscuous pyrethroid metabolic resistance mechanisms must be elucidated. Here, we demonstrate that the duplicated P450s CYP6P9a/-b, proficient pyrethroid metabolizers, reduce neonicotinoid efficacy in Anopheles funestus while enhancing the potency of chlorfenapyr. Transgenic expression of CYP6P9a/-b in Drosophila confirmed that flies expressing both genes were significantly more resistant to neonicotinoids than controls, whereas the contrasting pattern was observed for chlorfenapyr. This result was also confirmed by RNAi knockdown experiments. In vitro expression of recombinant CYP6P9a and metabolism assays established that it significantly depletes both clothianidin and chlorfenapyr, with metabolism of chlorfenapyr producing the insecticidally active intermediate metabolite tralopyril. This study highlights the risk of cross-resistance between pyrethroid and neonicotinoid and reveals that chlorfenapyr-based control interventions such as Interceptor G2 could remain efficient against some P450-based resistant mosquitoes.

2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 733, 2024 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39054424

ABSTRACT

Elevated resistance to pyrethroids in major malaria vectors has led to the introduction of novel insecticides including neonicotinoids. There is a fear that efficacy of these new insecticides could be impacted by cross-resistance mechanisms from metabolic resistance to pyrethroids. In this study, after evaluating the resistance to deltamethrin, clothianidin and mixture of clothianidin + deltamethrin in the lab using CDC bottle assays, the efficacy of the new IRS formulation Fludora® Fusion was tested in comparison to clothianidin and deltamethrin applied alone using experimental hut trials against wild free-flying pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles funestus from Elende and field An. gambiae collected from Nkolondom reared in the lab and released in the huts. Additionally, cone tests on the treated walls were performed each month for a period of twelve months to evaluate the residual efficacy of the sprayed products. Furthermore, the L1014F-kdr target-site mutation and the L119F-GSTe2 mediated metabolic resistance to pyrethroids were genotyped on a subset of mosquitoes from the EHT to assess the potential cross-resistance. All Anopheles species tested were fully susceptible to clothianidin and clothianidin + deltamethrin mixture in CDC bottle assay while resistance was noted to deltamethrin. Accordingly, Fludora® Fusion (62.83% vs 42.42%) and clothianidin (64.42% vs 42.42%) induced significantly higher mortality rates in EHT than deltamethrin (42.42%) against free flying An. funestus from Elende in month 1 (M1) and no significant difference in mortality was observed between the first (M1) and sixth (M6) months of the evaluation (P > 0.05). However, lower mortality rates were recorded against An. gambiae s.s from Nkolondom (mortality rates 50%, 45.56% and 26.68%). In-situ cone test on the wall showed a high residual efficacy of Fludora® Fusion and clothianidin on the susceptible strain KISUMU (> 12 months) and moderately on the highly pyrethroid-resistant An. gambiae strain from Nkolondom (6 months). Interestingly, no association was observed between the L119F-GSTe2 mutation and the ability of mosquitoes to survive exposure to Fludora® Fusion, whereas a trend was observed with the L1014F-kdr mutation. This study highlights that Fludora® Fusion, through its clothianidin component, has good potential of controlling pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes with prolonged residual efficacy. This could be therefore an appropriate tool for vector control in several malaria endemic regions.


Subject(s)
Anopheles , Insecticide Resistance , Insecticides , Malaria , Mosquito Control , Mosquito Vectors , Pyrethrins , Animals , Pyrethrins/pharmacology , Anopheles/drug effects , Anopheles/genetics , Insecticide Resistance/genetics , Insecticides/pharmacology , Mosquito Control/methods , Cameroon , Mosquito Vectors/drug effects , Mosquito Vectors/genetics , Malaria/transmission , Malaria/prevention & control , Guanidines/pharmacology , Nitriles/pharmacology , Female , Thiazoles/pharmacology , Neonicotinoids/pharmacology , Housing
3.
Infect Dis Poverty ; 12(1): 81, 2023 Aug 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37641108

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The increasing reports of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides associated with reduced efficacy of pyrethroid-only interventions highlight the urgency of introducing new non-pyrethroid-only control tools. Here, we investigated the performance of piperonyl-butoxide (PBO)-pyrethroid [Permanet 3.0 (P3.0)] and dual active ingredients (AI) nets [Interceptor G2 (IG2): containing pyrethroids and chlorfenapyr and Royal Guard (RG): containing pyrethroids and pyriproxyfen] compared to pyrethroid-only net Royal Sentry (RS) against pyrethroid-resistant malaria vectors in Cameroon. METHODS: The efficacy of these tools was firstly evaluated on Anopheles gambiae s.l. and Anopheles funestus s.l. from Gounougou, Mibellon, Mangoum, Nkolondom, and Elende using cone/tunnel assays. In addition, experimental hut trials (EHT) were performed to evaluate the performance of unwashed and 20 times washed nets in semi-field conditions. Furthermore, pyrethroid-resistant markers were genotyped in dead vs alive, blood-fed vs unfed mosquitoes after exposure to the nets to evaluate the impact of these markers on net performance. The XLSTAT software was used to calculate the various entomological outcomes and the Chi-square test was used to compare the efficacy of various nets. The odds ratio and Fisher exact test were then used to establish the statistical significance of any association between insecticide resistance markers and bed net efficacy. RESULTS: Interceptor G2 was the most effective net against wild pyrethroid-resistant An. funestus followed by Permanet 3.0. In EHT, this net induced up to 87.8% mortality [95% confidence interval (CI): 83.5-92.1%) and 55.6% (95% CI: 48.5-62.7%) after 20 washes whilst unwashed pyrethroid-only net (Royal Sentry) killed just 18.2% (95% CI: 13.4-22.9%) of host-seeking An. funestus. The unwashed Permanet 3.0 killed up to 53.8% (95% CI: 44.3-63.4%) of field-resistant mosquitoes and 47.2% (95% CI: 37.7-56.7%) when washed 20 times, and the Royal Guard 13.2% (95% CI: 9.0-17.3%) for unwashed net and 8.5% (95% CI: 5.7-11.4%) for the 20 washed net. Interceptor G2, Permanet 3.0, and Royal Guard provided better personal protection (blood-feeding inhibition 66.2%, 77.8%, and 92.8%, respectively) compared to pyrethroid-only net Royal Sentry (8.4%). Interestingly, a negative association was found between kdrw and the chlorfenapyr-based net Interceptor G2 (χ2 = 138; P < 0.0001) with homozygote-resistant mosquitoes predominantly found in the dead ones. CONCLUSIONS: The high mortality recorded with Interceptor G2 against pyrethroid-resistant malaria vectors in this study provides first semi-field evidence of high efficacy against these major malaria vectors in Cameroon encouraging the implementation of this novel net for malaria control in the country. However, the performance of this net should be established in other locations and on other major malaria vectors before implementation at a large scale.


Subject(s)
Anopheles , Malaria , Animals , Cameroon , Malaria/prevention & control , Mosquito Vectors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL