Impact of the lung oncology multidisciplinary team meetings on the management of patients with cancer.

AIMS: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings are increasingly regarded as a component of multidisciplinary cancer care. We aimed to prospectively measure the impact of MDT meetings on clinicians' management plans for lung oncology patients, and the implementation rate of the meeting recommendations. METHODS: Consecutive patient cases presented at the weekly lung oncology MDT meetings were prospectively enrolled. Investigators compared the clinicians' management plans pre-meeting with the consensus plans post-meeting. The meeting was considered to have an impact on management plans if ≥1 of the following changes were detected: tumor stage, histology, treatment intent or treatment modality, or if additional investigations were recommended. Investigators reviewed hospital patient records at 4 months to determine if the meeting recommendations were implemented. Reasons for non-implementation were also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 55 eligible cases, the MDT meeting changed management plans in 58% (CI 45-71%; P < 0.005). These changes included: additional investigations (59%), or changes in treatment modality (19%), treatment intent (9%), histology (6%) or tumor stage (6%). The meeting recommendations were implemented in 72% of cases. Reasons for non-implementation included deteriorating patient performance status, clinician's preference, the influence of new clinical information obtained after the meeting or patient decision. CONCLUSION: MDT meetings significantly impact on the management plans for lung oncology patients. The majority of MDT recommendations (72%) were implemented into patient care. These findings provide further evidence to support the role of MDT meetings as an essential part of the decision-making process for the optimal multidisciplinary management of patients with cancer.

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in the pre-operative staging of rectal adenocarcinoma: Experience from a regional Australian cancer center.

AIM: Selection of the optimal treatment pathway in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma relies on accurate locoregional staging. This study aims to assess the accuracy of staging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and in particular, its accuracy in differentiating patients with early stage disease from those with more advanced disease who benefit from a different treatment approach. METHODS: Patients who were staged with MRI and received surgery as the first line of treatment for biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum were identified. Comparison was made between the clinical stage on MRI and the pathological stage of the surgical specimen. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of MRI was assessed. RESULTS: In all, 58 eligible patients were identified. In 31% of patients, the extent of disease was underrepresented on preoperative MRI. Sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of anorectal MRI in detecting stage II/III disease status in this cohort was 59, 71 and 62%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI underestimated the pathological stage in many patients in this series who may have benefited from the addition of neoadjuvant radiotherapy to their management. This study supports further refinement of preoperative staging and demonstrates that impressive results from highly controlled settings may be difficult to reproduce in community practice.

The dosimetric impact of supraclavicular nodal irradiation on the thyroid gland in patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The thyroid is not routinely considered an organ at risk in supraclavicular (SC) nodal radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer. We compared the dosimetric impact of the following 2 RT planning techniques on the thyroid: (1) conventional single anterior field to encompass the SC nodal volume defined clinically; and (2) 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) planning to encompass the computed tomography (CT)-contoured SC nodal volume. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The thyroid, SC nodal volumes, and organs at risk were contoured on the planning CT of 20 patients who received 50 Gy in 2-Gy daily fractions to the breast or chest wall, and SC nodes. Comparisons of dosimetric parameters between the techniques were performed: thyroid, mean and maximum dose, V5, V30, and V50 (percentage of thyroid receiving ≥5 Gy, ≥30 Gy, and ≥50 Gy, respectively); SC nodal volume, homogeneity index (HI, percentage volume receiving 95%-107% of prescribed dose); and maximum doses of spinal cord and brachial plexus. Anatomic characteristics that influenced the dose distributions were investigated. RESULTS: The 3DCRT planning technique significantly increased all thyroid dosimetric measures (mean dose 17.2 Gy vs 26.7 Gy; maximum dose 48.5 Gy vs 51.9 Gy; V5 45.7% vs 64.9%; V30 33.7% vs 48%; and V50 0.6% vs 26.7%; P < .001). It improved HI for the SC nodal volumes (P < .001) but resulted in higher maximum doses to the spinal cord (6.1 Gy vs 30 Gy) and brachial plexus (43.2 Gy vs 51.4 Gy). The thyroid volume and depth of SC nodes did not influence the thyroid dose distribution. The depth of SC nodes impacted on the HI of SC nodal volumes in the conventional technique (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: The 3DCRT planning improved dosimetric coverage of the SC nodal volume but increased thyroid radiation doses. The potential adverse effects of incidental thyroid irradiation should be considered while improving dosimetric coverage in SC nodal irradiation for breast cancer.