Children and young adults with newly diagnosed rhabdomyosarcoma metastatic to bone treated on Children's Oncology Group studies.

BACKGROUND: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children. Despite bone metastases being present in 5% of patients at diagnosis, there are limited studies examining these outcomes. We sought to define the prognostic factors, clinical courses, and outcomes of children treated on Children's Oncology Group (COG) clinical trials with RMS metastatic to bone at diagnosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with bone metastatic RMS enrolled on COG RMS clinical trials (D9802, D9803, ARST0431, or ARST08P1) between 1997 and 2013. RESULTS: RMS metastatic to bone was identified in 154 patients at a median age of 14.9 years at diagnosis. Fifty-eight percent of patients were male, 90% had metastases at additional sites, 74% had alveolar histology, and extremity was the most common primary site (31%). Eighty-six percent of patients (n = 133) received radiation therapy. The 3- and 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 15.4% and 14.5%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 30.4% and 18.0%, respectively. We identified alveolar histology, FOXO1 fusion presence, unfavorable primary location, higher Oberlin score, and lack of radiation as poor prognostic characteristics for both EFS and OS in univariate analysis. Lack of radiation was not significant when excluding patients with events prior to 20 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest analysis of patients with bone metastatic RMS, and defines the poor overall outcomes and negative prognostic factors for these patients. They may be eligible for therapy deintensification for improved quality of life or pursuit of novel treatments/approaches, which are desperately needed.

Roadmap for the next generation of Children's Oncology Group rhabdomyosarcoma trials.

Clinical trials conducted by the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) Study Group and the Children's Oncology Group have been pivotal to establishing current standards for diagnosis and therapy for RMS. Recent advancements in understanding the biology and clinical behavior of RMS have led to more nuanced approaches to diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment. The complexities introduced by these advancements, coupled with the rarity of RMS, pose challenges to conducting large-scale phase 3 clinical trials to evaluate new treatment strategies for RMS. Given these challenges, systematic planning of future clinical trials in RMS is paramount to address pertinent questions regarding the therapeutic efficacy of drugs, biomarkers of response, treatment-related toxicity, and patient quality of life. Herein, the authors outline the proposed strategic approach of the Children's Oncology Group Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee to the next generation of RMS clinical trials, focusing on five themes: improved novel agent identification and preclinical to clinical translation, more efficient trial development and implementation, expanded opportunities for knowledge generation during trials, therapeutic toxicity reduction and quality of life, and patient engagement.

Healthcare Spending and Systemic Bevacizumab for Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis.

OBJECTIVES: Juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (JoRRP) is a rare, costly condition linked to human papillomavirus. Standard of care is serial surgical debridement. Many adjunctive therapies have been trialed, with recent success with systemic bevacizumab. This paper examines healthcare spending associated with systemic bevacizumab use for JoRRP and compares it to healthcare spending for surgical care alone to determine whether bevacizumab has a financial benefit. METHODS: Five patients treated with systemic bevacizumab for JoRRP were identified at a single institution. Spending data was derived from the electronic medical record. Sensitivity analysis was performed using variation in spending and frequency of treatments. RESULTS: Patients had an average of 4.2 treatments per year prior to bevacizumab (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-7.0) and 1.1 after (0.2-2.0). Patients underwent an average of 9.2 bevacizumab treatments in their first year after initiation, 4.0 in the second, and 4.5 in their third. Mean payment per debridement was $3198 ($2856-3539), with mean total surgical payment per year of $17,966 ($11,673-24,259) prior to initiating bevacizumab. Mean payment on a single bevacizumab infusion visit was $6508 ($6063-6952). Mean total surgical and bevacizumab spending per year after bevacizumab initiation were $83,951 ($12,938-154,964). CONCLUSIONS: Accounting for variations in the number of treatments per year with bevacizumab after initiation, healthcare spending after bevacizumab initiation is similar to spending on surgery alone for JoRRP in patients with severe disease.

Event-free survival in relapsed and refractory rhabdomyosarcoma treated on cooperative group phase II trials: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: Novel therapies are needed for relapsed and refractory rhabdomyosarcoma (RRMS). Phase II clinical trials in RRMS have typically utilized radiologic response as the primary activity endpoint, an approach that poses several limitations in RRMS. In this analysis, we aimed to estimate an event-free survival (EFS) endpoint for RRMS that could be used as a benchmark for future studies. PROCEDURE: We performed a retrospective study of patients with RRMS enrolling on 13 single-agent phase II Children's Oncology Group and legacy group trials from 1997 to 2016. All included trials used radiographic response as their primary activity endpoint. Six-month EFS was estimated from time of trial enrollment with 95% confidence intervals. Clinical characteristics, including trial of enrollment, sex, age, race, histology, number of prior chemotherapies, and radiographic response were evaluated for their impact on 6-month EFS. RESULTS: We identified 175 patients across 13 trials. The 6-month EFS was 16.8% (11.6%-22.8%). No differences were seen in 6-month EFS based on age, sex, race, or histology. There were nonsignificant trends toward improved 6-month EFS for patients with less than or equal to two prior lines of therapy versus higher than two, for patients enrolled on trials that achieved their primary radiographic response endpoint versus trials that did not, and for patients who achieved complete or partial response compared to those achieving stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of RRMS enrolled on single-agent phase II trials is poor. This pooled 6-month EFS of RRMS on single-agent trials may be used as a RRMS-specific benchmark for future single-agent phase II trials.

Germline Genetic Testing and Survival Outcomes Among Children With Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

Importance: Determining the impact of germline cancer-predisposition variants (CPVs) on outcomes could inform novel approaches to testing and treating children with rhabdomyosarcoma. Objective: To assess whether CPVs are associated with outcome among children with rhabdomyosarcoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, data were obtained for individuals, aged 0.01-23.23 years, newly diagnosed with rhabdomyosarcoma who were treated across 171 Children's Oncology Group sites from March 15, 1999, to December 8, 2017. Data analysis was performed from June 16, 2021, to May 15, 2023. Exposure: The presence of a CPV in 24 rhabdomyosarcoma-associated cancer-predisposition genes (CPGs) or an expanded set of 63 autosomal-dominant CPGs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were the main outcomes, using the Kaplan-Meier estimator to assess survival probabilities and the Cox proportional hazards regression model to adjust for clinical covariates. Analyses were stratified by tumor histology and the fusion status of PAX3 or PAX7 to the FOXO1 gene. Results: In this study of 580 individuals with rhabdomyosarcoma, the median patient age was 5.9 years (range, 0.01-23.23 years), and the male-to-female ratio was 1.5 to 1 (351 [60.5%] male). For patients with CPVs in rhabdomyosarcoma-associated CPGs, EFS was 48.4% compared with 57.8% for patients without a CPV (P = .10), and OS was 53.7% compared with 65.3% for patients without a CPV (P = .06). After adjustment, patients with CPVs had significantly worse OS (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 2.49 [95% CI, 1.39-4.45]; P = .002), and the outcomes were not better among patients with embryonal histology (EFS: AHR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.25-4.06]; P = .007]; OS: AHR, 2.83 [95% CI, 1.47-5.43]; P = .002]). These associations were not due to the development of a second malignant neoplasm, and importantly, patients with fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcoma who harbored a CPV had similarly inferior outcomes as patients with fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcoma without CPVs (EFS: AHR, 1.35 [95% CI, 0.71-2.59]; P = .37; OS: AHR, 1.71 [95% CI, 0.84-3.47]; P = .14). There were no significant differences in outcome by CPV status of the 63 CPG set. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study identified a group of patients with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma who had a particularly poor outcome. Other important clinical findings included that individuals with TP53 had poor outcomes independent of second malignant neoplasms and that patients with fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcoma who harbored a CPV had outcomes comparable to patients with fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcoma. These findings suggest that germline CPV testing may aid in clinical prognosis and should be considered in prospective risk-based clinical trials.

Outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas enrolled in phase 2 cooperative group clinical trials: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the event-free survival (EFS) of children and young adults with relapsed or refractory nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) treated in nonrandomized phase 2 studies conducted by the Children's Oncology Group (COG) and predecessor groups to establish a benchmark EFS for future phase 2 NRSTS trials evaluating the activity of novel agents. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with recurrent or refractory NRSTS prospectively enrolled in nonrandomized phase 2 COG and predecessor group trials between 1994 and 2015 was conducted. EFS was defined as disease progression/relapse or death and calculated via the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test and relative risk regression were used to compare EFS distribution by age at enrollment, sex, race, NRSTS histology, prior lines of therapy, calendar year of trial, and type of radiographic response. RESULTS: In total, 137 patients were enrolled in 13 phase 2 trials. All trials used radiographic response rate as a primary outcome, and none of the agents used were considered active on the basis of trial-specified thresholds. The estimated median EFS and 6-month EFS of the entire study cohort was 1.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-1.8 months) and 19.4% (95% CI, 12.7%-26%), respectively. No difference in EFS was observed by age at enrollment, sex, race, NRSTS histology subtype, prior lines of therapies, and trial initiation year. EFS significantly differed by radiographic response. CONCLUSIONS: The EFS for children and young adults with relapsed or refractory NRSTS remains suboptimal. Established EFS can be referenced as a benchmark for future single-agent phase 2 trials incorporating potentially active novel agents in this population.

Adolescents and young adults with rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of established prognostic factors on survival outcomes for childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) have not been well described in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) RMS patient population. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed RMS enrolled between 1997 and 2016 on seven previously reported Children's Oncology Group (COG) clinical trials. Demographics, clinical features, treatment details, and outcome data were collected. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated for patients diagnosed at age 15-39 years and those diagnosed under age 15 years using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used to compare prognostic factors for EFS and OS. Factors significant in the univariable analysis were included in a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Nonsignificant covariates were removed from the multiple regression model. RESULTS: Total 2151 patients including 402 AYAs were analyzed. AYAs were more likely to present with primary tumors ≥5 cm in size, metastatic disease, alveolar histology, and have FOXO1 fusions compared to children. Five-year EFS for the AYA cohort was 44.2% versus 67% for children (p < .001), and 5-year OS was 52% for the AYA cohort versus 78% for children (p < .001). Multivariable analysis revealed tumor site, size and invasiveness, clinical group, and histology were prognostic in AYAs. CONCLUSION: AYAs with RMS have a poorer prognosis compared to younger children due to multiple factors. Further research focused on AYAs to better understand RMS biology and improve treatments is critical to improve survival.