ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore the policies of key organisations in Australian health and medical research on defining, collecting, analysing, and reporting data on sex and gender, and to identify barriers to and facilitators of developing and implementing such policies. STUDY DESIGN: Mixed methods study: online planning forum; survey of organisations in Australian health and medical research, and internet search for policies defining, collecting, analysing, and reporting data by sex and gender in health and medical research. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Australia, 19 May 2021 (planning forum) to 12 December 2022 (final internet search). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relevant webpages and documents classified as dedicated organisation-specific sex and gender policies; policies, guidelines, or statements with broader aims, but including content that met the definition of a sex and gender policy; and references to external policies. RESULTS: The online planning forum identified 65 relevant organisations in Australian health and medical research; twenty participated in the policy survey. Seven organisations reported at least one relevant policy, and six had plans to develop or implement such policies during the following two years. Barriers to and facilitators of policy development and implementation were identified in the areas of leadership, language and definitions, and knowledge skills and training. The internet search found that 57 of the 65 organisations had some form of sex and gender policy, including all ten peer-reviewed journals and five of ten research funders; twelve organisations, including eight peak body organisations, had published dedicated sex and gender policies on their websites. CONCLUSION: Most of the organisations included in our study had policies regarding the integration of sex and gender in health and medical research. The implementation and evaluation of these policies is necessary to ensure that consideration of sex and gender is adequate during all stages of the research process.
ABSTRACT
Objective This study aimed to describe the development and implementation of a co-designed value-based healthcare (VBHC) framework within the public dental sector in Victoria. Methods A mixed-method study was employed. Explorative qualitative design was used to examine patient, workforce and stakeholder perspectives of implementing VBHC. Participatory action research was used to bring together qualitative narrative-based research and service design methods. An experience-based co-design approach was used to enable staff and patients to co-design services. Quantitative data was sourced from Titanium (online patient management system). Results Building a case for VBHC implementation required intensive work. It included co-designing, collaborating, planning and designing services based on patient needs. Evidence reviews, value-stream mapping and development of patient reported outcomes (PROMs) and patient reported experience measures (PREMs) were fundamental to VBHC implementation. Following VBHC implementation, a 44% lower failure to attend rate and 60% increase in preventive interventions was reported. A higher proportion of clinicians worked across their top scope of practice within a multi-disciplinary team. Approximately 80% of services previously provided by dentists were shifted to oral health therapists and dental assistants, thereby releasing the capacity of dentists to undertake complex treatments. Patients completed baseline International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement PROMs (n = 44,408), which have been used for social/clinical triaging, determining urgency of care based on risk, segmentation and tracking health outcomes. Following their care, patients completed a PREMs questionnaire (n = 15,402). Patients agreed or strongly agreed that: the care they received met their needs (87%); they received clear answers to their questions (93%); they left their visit knowing what is next (91%); they felt taken care of during their visit (94%); and they felt involved in their treatment and care (94%). Conclusion The potential for health system transformation through implementation of VBHC is significant, however, its implementation needs to extend beyond organisational approaches and focus on sustaining the principles of VBHC across healthcare systems, policy and practice.
Subject(s)
Oral Health , Value-Based Health Care , Humans , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Health Facilities , Government ProgramsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine how sex and gender are being incorporated into Australian medical research publications and if this is influenced by journals endorsing the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines, which contain criteria for sex and gender reporting. METHODS: Analysis of original research articles published in Australia's top 10 medical journals in 2020. RESULTS: From the 10 leading journals, 1,136 articles were eligible for analysis, including 990 human participant populations. Sex and/or gender were reported for 873 (88.2%) human populations, with 480 using conflicting terminology. Only 14 (1.6%) described how sex and gender were determined. The primary outcome, or key aim, was stratified by sex and/or gender for 249 (29.2%) participant groups and the influence of sex and/or gender on the results was discussed for only 171 (17.3%). There was no significant association between endorsement of the ICMJE guidelines and adherence to any sex and gender criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Sex and gender are poorly incorporated into Australian medical research publications and was not improved by journals endorsing the ICMJE guidelines. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Reporting and analysis of sex and gender data in health research in Australian medical journals requires improvement, for better health for all.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Humans , AustraliaSubject(s)
Brain , Efficiency , Investments , Mental Health/economics , Resilience, Psychological , Work/economics , Work/psychology , Aging , COVID-19/economics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cognition , Employment/economics , Humans , Neurology , Neurosciences , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Socioeconomic Factors , Workforce/economicsSubject(s)
Biomedical Research , Gender Identity , Health Policy , Sex Factors , Australia , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , North AmericaABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has disproportionately negative outcomes in men compared with women. The importance of the relationship between sex and tumor, node, metastases (TNM) staging system remains unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of sex on NSCLC survival for each stage in the eighth edition of the TNM staging system in NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two cohorts treated surgically with curative intent between 2000 and 2010 were analyzed. The primary cohort was from Australia with a second population set from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate analyses of putative and validated prognostic factors were undertaken to investigate sex-dependent prognostication with detailed analyses of sex differences in each TNM stage. The primary outcome was disease-specific survival (DSS) at 5 years. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 555 patients in the Australian cohort, 335 men (60.4%) and 220 (39.6%) women; and 47,706 patients from the SEER cohort, 24,671 men (51.7%) and 23,035 women (48.3%). Five-year DSS was significantly worse for men in multivariate analyses for the Australian (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.98; P = .026) and SEER (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.20-1.28; P < .001) cohorts. Detailed analysis of TNM stage sex differences revealed a consistent pattern of men having worse survival than women across stages in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: The poorer survival in men with NSCLC presents research and clinical communities with an important challenge. This study's findings suggest that for men and women diagnosed with NSCLC, and managed surgically, stage-specific outcomes should be quoted separately and consideration to a rapid prognostic score with sex combined with staging as a key element.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Sex Factors , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultSubject(s)
Global Health/trends , Health Equity/trends , Health Services Accessibility/trends , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Medical Oncology/trends , Neoplasms/therapy , Forecasting , Health Equity/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services Needs and Demand/trends , Healthcare Disparities/organization & administration , Humans , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Needs Assessment/trends , Neoplasms/mortalityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer has markedly poorer survival in men. Recognized important prognostic factors are divided into host, tumour and environmental factors. Traditional staging systems that use only tumour factors to predict prognosis are of limited accuracy. By examining sex-based patterns of disease-specific survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients, we determined the effect of sex on the prognostic value of additional host factors. METHODS: Two cohorts of patients treated surgically with curative intent between 2000 and 2009 were utilized. The primary cohort was from Melbourne, Australia, with an independent validation set from the American Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate analyses of validated host-related prognostic factors were performed in both cohorts to investigate the differences in survival between men and women. RESULTS: The Melbourne cohort had 605 patients (61% men) and SEER cohort comprised 55 681 patients (51% men). Disease-specific 5-year survival showed men had statistically significant poorer survival in both cohorts (P < 0.001); Melbourne men at 53.2% compared with women at 68.3%, and SEER 53.3% men and 62.0% women were alive at 5 years. Being male was independently prognostic for disease-specific mortality in the Melbourne cohort after adjustment for ethnicity, smoking history, performance status, age, pathological stage and histology (hazard ratio = 1.54, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-2.16, P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences in non-small cell lung cancer are important irrespective of age, ethnicity, smoking, performance status and tumour, node and metastasis stage. Epidemiological findings such as these should be translated into research and clinical paradigms to determine the factors that influence the survival disadvantage experienced by men.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Australia/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/ethnology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Karnofsky Performance Status , Lung Neoplasms/ethnology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Sex Factors , SmokingABSTRACT
Cancer incidence in the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population is higher and survival lower compared with non-Indigenous Australians. A proportion of these cancers are potentially preventable if factors associated with carcinogenesis are known and successfully avoided. We conducted a systematic review of the published literature to examine risk factors for cancer in the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population. Electronic databases Medline, Web of Science and the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Bibliographic Index were searched through August 2014 using broad search terms. Studies reporting a measure of association between a risk factor and any cancer site in the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population were eligible for inclusion. Ten studies (1991-2014) were identified, mostly with small sample sizes, showing marked heterogeneity in terms of methods used to assess exposure and capture outcomes, and often using descriptive comparative analyses. Relatively young (as opposed to elderly) and geographically remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders were found to be at increased risk for selected cancers while most modifiable lifestyle and behavioural risk factors were rarely assessed. Further studies examining associations between potential risk factors and cancer will help define public health policy for cancer prevention in the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population.
Subject(s)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Neoplasms/ethnology , Australia/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The use of targeted therapies toward specific oncogenic driver mutations has become a critical factor in the treatment of patients with lung cancer. It is therefore essential to utilize tests with high performance characteristics. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the standard method for detecting anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and ROS1 rearrangements in non-small-cell lung cancer but the utility of other methods such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) is unclear. METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-two lung cancer patients were tested with FISH, CISH, and IHC using three ALK antibodies (ALK1, 5A4, D5F3) and one ROS1 antibody in the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements. RESULTS: There was a 97.4% concordance (298 of 306) between FISH and CISH for detection of ALK rearrangements. The ROS1 rearrangement status had a 97% (291 of 300) concordance between CISH and FISH. ALK protein expression was observed in 6 of 341 samples with the ALK1 and 5A4 antibodies and 5 of 341 samples with D5F3. All three antibodies stained each of the ALK FISH-positive samples (100% sensitivity). ROS1 protein expression was observed in 2 of 322 samples. One of three samples with a ROS1 rearrangement by FISH showed ROS1 protein expression (33.3% sensitivity). CONCLUSION: Our findings show good correlation between FISH versus CISH in the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements. FISH versus IHC showed good correlation in the detection of ALK rearrangements but showed weak correlation in the detection of ROS1 rearrangements. These results suggest CISH and IHC could be complimentary detection methods to FISH in the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Mutation , Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Female , Gene Rearrangement , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/metabolism , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/metabolism , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Genomic translocation events frequently underlie cancer development through generation of gene fusions with oncogenic properties. Identification of such fusion transcripts by transcriptome sequencing might help to discover new potential therapeutic targets. We developed TRUP (Tumor-specimen suited RNA-seq Unified Pipeline) (https://github.com/ruping/TRUP), a computational approach that combines split-read and read-pair analysis with de novo assembly for the identification of chimeric transcripts in cancer specimens. We apply TRUP to RNA-seq data of different tumor types, and find it to be more sensitive than alternative tools in detecting chimeric transcripts, such as secondary rearrangements in EML4-ALK-positive lung tumors, or recurrent inactivating rearrangements affecting RASSF8.
Subject(s)
Chromosome Breakpoints , Computational Biology , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Oncogene Fusion , Transcriptome , Translocation, Genetic , Base Sequence , Cell Line, Tumor , Cluster Analysis , Computational Biology/methods , Gene Silencing , Genomics , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/geneticsABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a lung cancer patient cohort and to correlate results with morphology, silver in situ hybridization (SISH), and patient outcome. FGFR1 FISH and SISH were performed in 406 and 385 lung cancer cases, respectively, and the results were compared. High-level FGFR1 amplification was defined as the ratio of FGFR1/centromere 8 ≥2, or tumor cell percentage with ≥15 signals ≥10%, or average number of signals/tumor cell nucleus ≥6. Low-level amplification was defined as tumor cell percentage with ≥5 signals ≥50%. Of 406 tumors tested, there were 191 squamous cell carcinomas, 28 carcinomas with focal squamous morphology, 24 large cell carcinomas with squamous immunoprofile, 115 adenocarcinomas, 17 neuroendocrine tumors, and 31 carcinomas without squamous morphology or immunoprofile. FGFR1 FISH was assessable in 368 tumors, with FGFR1 amplification identified in 50, including 48 tumors with either squamous morphology or immunoprofile (48 of 225, 21.3%), and two 'marker-null' tumors without squamous or glandular morphology or immunoprofile (2 of 143, 1.4%; P<0.0001). FGFR1 SISH was assessable in 347 tumors. All 46 FGFR1 FISH-amplified tumors with tumor available for testing showed amplification with SISH, while all other tumors were negative. There was no relationship between FGFR1 amplification status and disease-free (P=0.88, HR=1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.67-1.60) or overall survival (P=0.97, HR=1.01, 95% CI=0.65-1.58) in surgically radically treated patients with tumors with any squamous morphology or immunoprofile. FGFR1 amplification is a common abnormality in tumors with any squamous morphology or immunoprofile, but it is also present in 'marker-null' tumors. The results of FGFR1 SISH showed 1:1 correlation with the results of FGFR1 FISH, indicating that SISH may be an alternative method to detect FGFR1 amplification. No relationship was detected between patient outcome and FGFR1 amplification.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , In Situ Hybridization/methods , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma/genetics , Carcinoma/mortality , Carcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Female , Gene Amplification , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Tissue Array Analysis , Young AdultABSTRACT
Pulmonary carcinoids are rare neuroendocrine tumours of the lung. The molecular alterations underlying the pathogenesis of these tumours have not been systematically studied so far. Here we perform gene copy number analysis (n=54), genome/exome (n=44) and transcriptome (n=69) sequencing of pulmonary carcinoids and observe frequent mutations in chromatin-remodelling genes. Covalent histone modifiers and subunits of the SWI/SNF complex are mutated in 40 and 22.2% of the cases, respectively, with MEN1, PSIP1 and ARID1A being recurrently affected. In contrast to small-cell lung cancer and large-cell neuroendocrine lung tumours, TP53 and RB1 mutations are rare events, suggesting that pulmonary carcinoids are not early progenitor lesions of the highly aggressive lung neuroendocrine tumours but arise through independent cellular mechanisms. These data also suggest that inactivation of chromatin-remodelling genes is sufficient to drive transformation in pulmonary carcinoids.
Subject(s)
Carcinoid Tumor/genetics , Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Mutation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Base Sequence , Carcinoid Tumor/pathology , Chromosome Mapping , DNA Copy Number Variations , Exome/genetics , Female , Gene Dosage , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Genome, Human/genetics , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Sequence Data , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Young AdultABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: We discovered a novel somatic gene fusion, CD74-NRG1, by transcriptome sequencing of 25 lung adenocarcinomas of never smokers. By screening 102 lung adenocarcinomas negative for known oncogenic alterations, we found four additional fusion-positive tumors, all of which were of the invasive mucinous subtype. Mechanistically, CD74-NRG1 leads to extracellular expression of the EGF-like domain of NRG1 III-ß3, thereby providing the ligand for ERBB2-ERBB3 receptor complexes. Accordingly, ERBB2 and ERBB3 expression was high in the index case, and expression of phospho-ERBB3 was specifically found in tumors bearing the fusion (P < 0.0001). Ectopic expression of CD74-NRG1 in lung cancer cell lines expressing ERBB2 and ERBB3 activated ERBB3 and the PI3K-AKT pathway, and led to increased colony formation in soft agar. Thus, CD74-NRG1 gene fusions are activating genomic alterations in invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas and may offer a therapeutic opportunity for a lung tumor subtype with, so far, no effective treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: CD74NRG1 fusions may represent a therapeutic opportunity for invasive mucinous lung adenocarcinomas, a tumor with no effective treatment that frequently presents with multifocal unresectable disease.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Antigens, Differentiation, B-Lymphocyte/genetics , Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Neuregulin-1/genetics , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Base Sequence , Cell Line, Tumor , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Mice , Middle Aged , Molecular Sequence Data , NIH 3T3 Cells , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/metabolism , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Signal Transduction/geneticsABSTRACT
We investigated if gene copy number (GCN) alterations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as detected by silver enhanced in situ hybridisation (SISH), could be used to select patients for EGFR mutation testing. Resected lung adenocarcinoma specimens with adequate tumour were identified. EGFR SISH was performed using the Ventana Benchmark Ultra platform. EGFR GCN was classified according to the Colorado Classification System. EGFR mutations were scanned by high resolution melting and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Thirty-four of 96 tumours were EGFR SISH positive (35%), and 31 of 96 tumours harboured one or more EGFR mutations (32%). Of 31 EGFR-mutant tumours, 18 were EGFR SISH positive (58%). There was a statistically significant relationship between the presence of an EGFR mutation and EGFR GCN (pâ=â0.003). Thirteen of 31 EGFR-mutant tumours were EGFR SISH negative (42%), and 16 of 65 EGFR-wild type tumours were EGFR SISH positive (24%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 58%, 75%, 52.9% and 79%, respectively. Despite a significant relationship between EGFR GCN alterations and EGFR mutations, our results indicate that EGFR GCN as detected by SISH is not a suitable way to select patients for EGFR mutation testing.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genetics , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Gene Dosage , Humans , In Situ Hybridization , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Pilot Projects , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1) and CD133 has been functionally associated with a stem cell phenotype in normal and malignant cells. The prevalence of such cells in solid tumours should therefore correlate with recurrence and/or metastasis following definitive surgical resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of ALDH1A1 and CD133 in surgically resected, early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ALDH1A1 and CD133 expression in 205 patients with pathologic stage I NSCLC was performed using immunohistochemistry. The association between the expression of both markers and survival was determined. RESULTS: We identified 62 relapses and 58 cancer-related deaths in 144 stage 1A and 61 stage 1B patients, analysed at a median of 5-years follow-up. Overexpression of ALDH1A1 and CD133, detected in 68.7% and 50.7% of primary tumours, respectively, was an independent prognostic indicator for overall survival by multivariable Cox proportional hazard model (p=0.017 and 0.039, respectively). Overexpression of ALDH1A1, but not of CD133, predicted poor recurrence-free survival (p=0.025). When categorised into three groups according to expression of ALDH1A1/CD133, patients with overexpression of both ALDH1A1 and CD133 belonged to the group with the shortest recurrence-free and overall survival (p=0.015 and 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Expression of ALDH1A1 and CD133, and coexpression of ALDH1A1 and CD133, is strongly associated with poor survival in early-stage NSCLC following surgical resection. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that expression of stem cell markers correlates with recurrence as an indirect measure of self-renewal capacity.
Subject(s)
Aldehyde Dehydrogenase/analysis , Antigens, CD/analysis , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Glycoproteins/analysis , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Peptides/analysis , AC133 Antigen , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Family , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/chemistry , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lung Neoplasms/chemistry , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Proportional Hazards Models , Recurrence , Retinal Dehydrogenase , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Rearrangements of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) define a molecular subgroup of tumors characterized clinically by sensitivity to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as crizotinib. Although ALK rearrangements may be detected by reverse transcriptase-PCR, immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), the optimal clinical strategy for identifying ALK rearrangements in clinical samples remains to be determined. We evaluated immunohistochemistry using three different antibodies (ALK1, 5A4 and D5F3 clones) to detect ALK rearrangements and compared those with FISH. We report the frequency and clinicopathologic features of lung cancers harboring ALK translocations in 594 resected NSCLCs (470 adenocarcinomas; 83 squamous carcinomas, 26 large cell carcinomas and 15 other histological subtypes) using a tissue microarray approach. We identified an ALK gene rearrangement in 7/594 cases (1%) by FISH and all anti-ALK antibodies correctly identified the seven ALK-positive cases (100% sensitivity), although the intensity of staining was weak in some cases. These data indicate that the use of antibodies with high sensitivity and avidity to ALK may provide an effective pre-screening technique to complement the more expensive and labor-intensive approach of ALK FISH testing.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Immunohistochemistry/methods , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase , Female , Gene Rearrangement , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Tissue Array AnalysisABSTRACT
Global health (GH) training is well established overseas (particularly in North America) and reflects an increasing focus on social accountability in medical education. Despite significant interest among trainees, GH is poorly integrated with specialty training programs in Australia. While there are numerous benefits from international rotations in resource-poor settings, there are also risks to the host community, trainee and training provider. Safe and effective placements rely on firm ethical foundations as well as strong and durable partnerships between Australian and overseas health services, educational institutions and GH agencies. More formal systems of GH training in Australia have the potential to produce fellows with the skills and knowledge necessary to engage in regional health challenges in a global context.