Effective Facilitator Strategies for Supporting Primary Care Practice Change: A Mixed Methods Study.

PURPOSE: Practice facilitation is an evidence-informed implementation strategy to support quality improvement (QI) and aid practices in aligning with best evidence. Few studies, particularly of this size and scope, identify strategies that contribute to facilitator effectiveness. METHODS: We conducted a sequential mixed methods study, analyzing data from EvidenceNOW, a large-scale QI initiative. Seven regional cooperatives employed 162 facilitators to work with 1,630 small or medium-sized primary care practices. Main analyses were based on facilitators who worked with at least 4 practices. Facilitators were defined as more effective if at least 75% of their practices improved on at least 1 outcome measure-aspirin use, blood pressure control, smoking cessation counseling (ABS), or practice change capacity, measured using Change Process Capability Questionnaire-from baseline to follow-up. Facilitators were defined as less effective if less than 50% of their practices improved on these outcomes. Using an immersion crystallization and comparative approach, we analyzed observational and interview data to identify strategies associated with more effective facilitators. RESULTS: Practices working with more effective facilitators had a 3.6% greater change in the mean percentage of patients meeting the composite ABS measure compared with practices working with less effective facilitators (P <.001). More effective facilitators cultivated motivation by tailoring QI work and addressing resistance, guided practices to think critically, and provided accountability to support change, using these strategies in combination. They were able to describe their work in detail. In contrast, less effective facilitators seldom used these strategies and described their work in general terms. Facilitator background, experience, and work on documentation did not differentiate between more and less effective facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitation strategies that differentiate more and less effective facilitators have implications for enhancing facilitator development and training, and can assist all facilitators to more effectively support practice changes.

Use of Quality Improvement Strategies Among Small to Medium-Size US Primary Care Practices.

PURPOSE: Improving primary care quality is a national priority, but little is known about the extent to which small to medium-size practices use quality improvement (QI) strategies to improve care. We examined variations in use of QI strategies among 1,181 small to medium-size primary care practices engaged in a national initiative spanning 12 US states to improve quality of care for heart health and assessed factors associated with those variations. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, practice characteristics were assessed by surveying practice leaders. Practice use of QI strategies was measured by the validated Change Process Capability Questionnaire (CPCQ) Strategies Scale (scores range from -28 to 28, with higher scores indicating more use of QI strategies). Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the association between practice characteristics and the CPCQ strategies score. RESULTS: The mean CPCQ strategies score was 9.1 (SD = 12.2). Practices that participated in accountable care organizations and those that had someone in the practice to configure clinical quality reports from electronic health records (EHRs), had produced quality reports, or had discussed clinical quality data during meetings had higher CPCQ strategies scores. Health system-owned practices and those experiencing major disruptive changes, such as implementing a new EHR system or clinician turnover, had lower CPCQ strategies scores. CONCLUSION: There is substantial variation in the use of QI strategies among small to medium-size primary care practices across 12 US states. Findings suggest that practices may need external support to strengthen their ability to do QI and to be prepared for new payment and delivery models.

Childhood Obesity in an Inner-City Primary Care Population: A Longitudinal Study.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the dynamics of obesity among children and adolescents in high-risk, low-income patient populations is critical to guide and evaluate appropriate clinical and public health interventions. METHODS: We identified a cohort of 472 predominantly low-income, minority pediatric patients aged 3-18 years with baseline measurements in 2010 and analyzed follow-up data through September 2013. Weight status at baseline and end of follow-up were ascertained. RESULTS: The prevalence of obesity was 25% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21%-29%) at baseline and 24% (95% CI 20%-28%) after an average of 2.3 years follow-up. Among the 353 subjects who were not obese at baseline, the cumulative incidence of obesity was 8% (95% CI 5%-11%). Those who were normal weight at baseline had an incidence of 3% (1%-6%); those who were overweight had an incidence of 22% (95% CI 14%-32%). Among the 119 subjects who were obese at baseline, 29% (95% CI 21%-38%) were not obese at the end of follow-up. Remission of obesity among those who were severely obese was only 12% (95% CI 4%-26%); among other obese patients remission was 38% (95% CI 28%-50%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of obesity did not change substantially during follow-up. The cumulative incidence of obesity was 8%, and most of the incidence was among children who were overweight at baseline. Remission was common, especially among those who were not severely obese at baseline. Understanding and addressing determinants of obesity over the lifecourse is critical to the long-term health of children in the United States.

Recognition and Management of Elevated Blood Pressure in Pediatric Patients: Challenges and Disparities in Community Health Centers.

The prevalence of childhood elevated blood pressure (EBP)-a single blood pressure recording above the normal range-is increasing in the United States. Recognizing childhood EBP is difficult because classification is a function of age, sex, and height. We assessed the frequency of clinical recognition of EBP and follow-up care in a sample of pediatric patients seen in 2010 and followed up through September 2013 in a network of 8 urban health centers. Of 754 patients with BP measurements, 261 (35 %) had at least 1 EBP reading during the study period. Of those with an EBP reading, 52 (20 %) had at least 1 EBP reading noted in their medical record. Clinicians were more likely to recognize EBP in overweight/obese [OR 3.27 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.64-6.51)] and male [OR 2.83 (95 % CI 1.64-4.42)] children. Strategies to support routine monitoring of BP status could improve identification and management of pediatric EBP.