Comparative Genitourinary Safety of In-class Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors among Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: The American Heart Association recommended sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) for the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, little is known about their real-world in-class comparative safety in patients with HFpEF. We aimed to assess the comparative safety of SGLT2i in the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) or genital infection separately or as a composite outcome among patients with HFpEF. METHODS: This cohort study using MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare supplemental databases (2012-2020) included patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of HFpEF who initiated SGLT2i therapy. Three pairwise comparison groups were established: cohort 1, dapagliflozin versus canagliflozin; cohort 2, empagliflozin versus canagliflozin; and cohort 3, dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin. After stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting, Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the risk of UTI or genital infection separately or as a composite outcome in each cohort. RESULTS: The risk of the composite outcome did not significantly differ between canagliflozin and dapagliflozin (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-1.14) or between empagliflozin and canagliflozin (aHR 1.25; 95% CI 0.77-2.05). Similarly, there was no evidence of difference between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in this risk (aHR 0.76; 95% CI 0.48-1.21). The results of analyses separately assessing UTI or genital infection were similar. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the risk of UTI or genital infection among patients with HFpEF who initiated canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or empagliflozin.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are used for the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). It is important to assess their comparative risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) or genital infection among patients with HFpEF. We compared patients with HFpEF using SGLT2i in three pairwise groups: cohort 1, dapagliflozin versus canagliflozin; cohort 2, empagliflozin versus canagliflozin; and cohort 3, dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin. We found that there was no significant difference in the risk of genitourinary infections including UTI or genital infections among dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and canagliflozin.

Dementia is associated with worse procedural outcomes after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

BACKGROUND: Patients with dementia are at increased risk for adverse events following valvular surgery. Outcomes after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for mitral regurgitation in this vulnerable population are not well understood. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample database for all hospitalizations for mitral TEER between 2016 and 2019. Patients with a validated diagnosis code for dementia were identified by ICD-10 codes and compared to a matched cohort of non-dementia patients using multivariable regression analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, discharge to nursing facility, total hospital charges, and in-hospital adverse events. RESULTS: 24,550 hospitalizations for mitral TEER were identified, including 880 patients (3.6 %) with dementia. Dementia was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (OR 4.31, 95 % CI 2.65 to 6.99, p < 0.001), prolonged length of hospital stay (OR 1.33, 95 % CI 1.12 to 1.57, p 0.001), higher discharge rate to nursing facility (OR 2.71, 95 % CI 2.13-3.44, p < 0.001), and higher rate of in-hospital adverse events including delirium (OR 5.88, 95 % CI 4.06 to 8.52, p < 0.001) and acute stroke (OR 8.87, 95 % CI 5.01 to 15.70, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Dementia is associated with worse post-procedural outcomes after mitral TEER. Further investigation is needed to elucidate mechanisms of poor clinical outcomes and guide shared decision-making in this vulnerable population.

Comparative effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A real-world study.

PURPOSE: Sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are recommended therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but little is known about their real-world comparative effectiveness among patients with HFpEF. The objective of this study was to determine the comparative effectiveness of SAC/VAL vs ARBs in preventing HF-related hospitalization or all-cause hospitalization among patients with HFpEF. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using IBM MarketScan commercial and Medicare supplemental databases to identify patients aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of HFpEF and initiation of SAC/VAL (2015-2020) or ARB (2009-2014) therapy. The index date was the date of the first SAC/VAL or ARB prescription fill. After propensity score (PS) matching with a ratio of 1 up to 3, Cox proportional hazards regression was used with robust variance estimators to compare the risks of HF-related hospitalization and all-cause hospitalization between the 2 therapies. Several subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to check the robustness of the main analysis. RESULTS: After PS matching, 2,520 patients (846 receiving SAC/VAL and 1,674 receiving an ARB) were included in the final analyses. After controlling for covariates, there was no difference in the risk of HF-related hospitalization between SAC/VAL and ARB recipients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.77). There was also no difference in the risk of all-cause hospitalization between SAC/VAL and ARB recipients (aHR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91-1.24). CONCLUSION: Among individuals with private or Medicare Advantage insurance plans, there was no significant difference in the risk of HF-related hospitalization or all-cause hospitalization between adults with HFpEF who received SAC/VAL and those who received ARB therapy.

Systematic Review of Literature Citing the ISCHEMIA Trial.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Optimal therapy for patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CCD) has long been a topic under investigation and a subject of debate. Seeking to clarify appropriate management, the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial compared medical management versus coronary angiography for patients with stable ischemic heart disease. Its reception in the medical community has been met with both acclaim and criticism. In light of such disparate views of this trial, a systematic review of the literature citing the ISCHEMIA trial was performed. RECENT FINDINGS: All articles citing the ISCHEMIA trial on PubMed as of July 21, 2023, were compiled and underwent qualitative analysis. A total of 430 articles were evaluated; 109 (25.3%) did not offer substantial commentary on ISCHEMIA and cite it as background evidence for further study. Of the commentary articles, the majority (224, 52.1%) gave balanced, honest appraisals of the ISCHEMIA trial. A total of 46 (10.7%) strongly praised the trial while another 39 (9.1%) were strongly critical of the results. Almost three-quarters of the literature citing the ISCHEMIA trial was commentary in nature, with roughly equal distribution across the spectrum of praise and criticism. Despite being one of the largest studies on CCD and coronary revascularization ever conducted, the impact of ISCHEMIA on the cardiology community appears to be mixed.

Validated predictive model for treatment and prognosis of adrenocortical carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Adrenocortical carcinoma has a poor prognosis and multiple clinical, pathological, and treatment variables. Currently, we lack a prognostic and treatment calculator to determine the survival and efficacy of adjuvant chemoradiation. We aimed to validate a calculator to assess prognosis and treatment. METHODS: We searched the National Cancer Database to identify patients with adrenocortical carcinoma surgically treated from 2004 to 2020 and randomly allocated them into a training (80%) or validation set (20%). We analyzed the variables of age; sex; Charlson Comorbidity Index; insurance status; tumor size; pathologic tumor, node, and metastasis categories; surgical margins; and use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. We used Cox regression prediction models and bootstrap coefficients to generate a mathematical model to predict 5- and 10-year overall survival. After using the area under the curve analysis to assess the model's performance, we compared overall survival in the training and validation sets. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis of the 3,480 patients included in the study revealed that all variables were significant except sex (P < .05) and incorporated into a mathematical model. The area under the curve for 5- and 10-year overall survival was 0.68 and 0.70, respectively, for the training set and 0.70 and 0.72, respectively, for the validation set. For the bootstrap coefficients, the 5- and 10-year overall survival was 6.4% and 4.1%, respectively, above the observed mean. CONCLUSION: Our model predicts the overall survival of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma based on clinical, pathologic, and treatment variables and can assist in individualizing treatment.

2023 Multimodality Appropriate Use Criteria for the Detection and Risk Assessment of Chronic Coronary Disease: A Summary for JASE.

This report provides a descriptive summary of the ACC/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ASPC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2023 Multimodality Appropriate Use Criteria for the Detection and Risk Assessment of Chronic Coronary Disease with an emphasis on the role of stress echocardiography.

ACC/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ASPC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2023 Multimodality Appropriate Use Criteria for the Detection and Risk Assessment of Chronic Coronary Disease.

The American College of Cardiology (ACC) Foundation, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an appropriate use review of stress testing and anatomic diagnostic procedures for risk assessment and evaluation of known or suspected chronic coronary disease (CCD), formerly referred to as stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). This document reflects an updating of the prior Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) published for radionuclide imaging, stress echocardiography (echo), calcium scoring, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and invasive coronary angiography for SIHD. This is in keeping with the commitment to revise and refine the AUC on a frequent basis. As with the prior version of this document, rating of test modalities is provided side-by-side for a given clinical scenario. These ratings are explicitly not considered competitive rankings due to the limited availability of comparative evidence, patient variability, and the range of capabilities available in any given local setting1-4.This version of the AUC for CCD is a focused update of the prior version of the AUC for SIHD4. Key changes beyond the updated ratings based on new evidence include the following: 1. Clinical scenarios related to preoperative testing were removed and will be incorporated into another AUC document under development. 2. Some clinical scenarios and tables were removed in an effort to simplify the selection of clinical scenarios. Additionally, the flowchart of tables has been reorganized, and all clinical scenario tables can now be reached by answering a limited number of clinical questions about the patient, starting with the patient's symptom status. 3. Several clinical scenarios have been revised to incorporate changes in other documents such as pretest probability assessment, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk assessment, syncope, and others. ASCVD risk factors that are not accounted for in contemporary risk calculators have been added as modifiers to certain clinical scenarios. The 64 clinical scenarios rated in this document are limited to the detection and risk assessment of CCD and were drawn from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines.5 These clinical scenarios do not specifically address patients having acute chest pain episodes. They may, however, be applicable in the inpatient setting if the patient is not having an acute coronary syndrome and warrants evaluation for CCD.Using standardized methodology, clinical scenarios were developed to describe common patient encounters in clinical practice focused on common applications and anticipated uses of testing for CCD. Where appropriate, the scenarios were developed on the basis of the most current ACC/American Heart Association guidelines. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios in this document on a scale of 1 to 9, following a modified Delphi process consistent with the recently updated AUC development methodology. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that a modality is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented, midrange scores of 4 to 6 indicate that a modality may be appropriate for the clinical scenario, and scores of 1 to 3 indicate that a modality is rarely appropriate.

Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Is Associated With Higher Mortality and Limb Revascularization After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is common in patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. PAD exists as a spectrum, and patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the most severe form of PAD, are at high risk for limb loss and death. We seek to determine patient characteristics and clinical outcomes among patients who underwent TAVR with or without CLTI. We identified all hospitalizations for TAVR from October 2015 to December 2018 using the National Inpatient Sample database. Patients with any diagnosis of CLTI were identified using the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes were major complications, open revascularization, and endovascular revascularization after TAVR. During the study period, a total of 31,335 hospitalizations for TAVR procedures were included, including 7,048 (22.5%) in patients with CLTI. CLTI was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13 to 1.74, p = 0.002) and major complications (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.25, p <0.001). CLTI was also associated with a significantly higher rate of open limb revascularization (OR 5.1, 95% CI 3.94 to 6.48, p <0.001) and endovascular revascularization (OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.54 to 4.59, p <0.001). CLTI among patients who underwent TAVR is associated with higher in-hospital mortality, major complications, and longer lengths of stay compared with patients without CLTI. However, the overall rates of adverse events remain low. Further studies are needed to optimize the multidisciplinary care of these patients before TAVR with a focus on shared decision-making.

The Medicare Appropriate Use Criteria Program: A Review of Recommendations for Testing in Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Congress established the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) Program to reduce unnecessary advanced imaging studies. Organizations that wish to develop AUC can apply to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to qualify as provider-led entities (PLEs) under this program. Variable methods, content, and formatting of PLE-generated AUC could lead to clinician uncertainty about whether an advanced imaging test is appropriate or not. PURPOSE: To review AUC published by CMS-qualified PLEs focused on advanced imaging tests for coronary artery disease (CAD), a "priority clinical area" identified by CMS. DATA SOURCES: Publicly available data from the worldwide web searched on 29 August 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Approved AUC with recommendations related to testing for CAD. DATA EXTRACTION: Manual review of published AUC by all authors. DATA SYNTHESIS: Among the 17 CMS-qualified PLEs, only 7 had published AUC related to CAD. Substantial variation in the methods and formatting of these AUCs was observed. The number of clinical scenarios covered ranged from 6 to 210, and the number of advanced imaging methods covered ranged from 1 to 25. When specifically applied to clinical scenarios, many AUC offered no guidance on appropriateness; those that did conflicted with respect to appropriateness. LIMITATION: Other CMS-identified priority clinical areas were not evaluated. CONCLUSION: CMS-qualified AUC for imaging of CAD are heterogeneous and sometimes discrepant, creating substantial potential for uncertainty among clinicians seeking to provide their patients with appropriate imaging tests. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: No funding was received for this study.

Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are recommended by the American Heart Association for management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but little is known about their in-class comparative effectiveness in real-world settings. OBJECTIVES: To assess the in-class comparative effectiveness of SGLT2i for preventing HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations among patients with HFpEF. METHODS: Using MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental research databases (2012-2020), this cohort study included adults with HFpEF treated with SGLT2i. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations in three pairwise comparisons: dapagliflozin versus canagliflozin, empagliflozin versus canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess robustness of the main analysis. RESULTS: In total, 3629 SGLT2i users (881 dapagliflozin, 1120 canagliflozin, and 1628 empagliflozin) were included. Compared with canagliflozin, dapagliflozin was associated with decreased risk of HF-related hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.01) and all-cause hospitalization (aHR, 0.84; 95% CI 0.73-0.97). Compared with canagliflozin, empagliflozin was associated with 55% decreased risk of HF-related hospitalization (aHR, 0.45; 95% CI 0.34-0.59) and 18% decreased risk of all-cause hospitalization (aHR, 0.82; 95% CI 0.73-0.93). Compared with empagliflozin, dapagliflozin was associated with 50% increased risk of HF-related hospitalization (aHR, 1.50; 95% CI 1.09-2.07) and a statistically nonsignificant increase in the risk of all-cause hospitalization (aHR, 1.05; 95% CI 0.92-1.20). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with canagliflozin or dapagliflozin use, empagliflozin use was associated with decreased risk of HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations. Compared with canagliflozin, dapagliflozin was associated with a reduced risk of HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations.

Prognostic Value of Frailty for Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Systematic Review.

Frailty is associated with poor clinical outcomes in heart failure patients. The impact of frailty on outcomes following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, however, is less clearly defined. We therefore sought to conduct a systematic review to evaluate current frailty assessment strategies and their significance for patients undergoing LVAD implantation. We conducted a comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases from inception until April 2021 for studies examining frailty in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Study characteristics, patient demographics, type of frailty measurement, and outcomes were extracted. Outcomes were organized into 5 basic categories: implant length of stay (iLOS), 1-year mortality, rehospitalization, adverse events, and quality of life (QOL). Of the 260 records retrieved, 23 studies involving 4935 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Approaches to measuring frailty varied, with the 2 most common being sarcopenia determined by computed tomography and Fried's frailty phenotype assessment. Outcomes of interest were also widely variable, with iLOS stay and mortality being the most frequently reported, albeit with differing definitions of both between studies. The heterogeneity among included studies precluded quantitative synthesis. Narrative synthesis showed that frailty by any measure is more likely to be associated with higher mortality, longer iLOS, more adverse events and worse QOL post-LVAD implant. Frailty can be a valuable prognostic indicator in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Further studies are needed to determine the most sensitive frailty assessment, as well as the ways in which frailty may serve as a modifiable target to improve outcomes following LVAD implantation.

Informing Use of Telehealth for Managing Chronic Conditions: Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Telehealth Use to Manage Heart Failure During COVID-19.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic forced Veterans Health Administration facilities to rapidly adopt and deploy telehealth alternatives to provide continuity of care to veterans while minimizing physical contact. The impact of moving to virtual visits on patients with congestive heart failure (HF) is unknown. The goal of this study was to understand how patients with HF and their providers experienced the shift to telehealth for managing a chronic condition, and to inform best practices for continued telehealth use. Methods and Results We identified Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers with high telehealth use before COVID-19 and sites that were forced to adopt telehealth in response to COVID-19, and interviewed cardiology providers and veterans with HF about their experiences using telehealth. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using team-based rapid content analysis. We identified 3 trajectory patterns for cardiology telehealth use before and during COVID-19. They were the low-use class (low to low), high-use class (relatively high to higher), and increased-use class (low to high). The high-use and increased-use classes fit the criteria for sites that had high telehealth use before COVID-19 and sites that rapidly adopted telehealth in response to COVID-19. There were 12 sites in the high-use class and 4 sites in the increased-use class. To match with the number of sites in the increased-use class, we selected the top 4 sites by looking at the months before COVID-19. We identified 3 themes related to telehealth use among patients with HF and cardiology providers: (1) technology was the primary barrier for both patients and providers; (2) infrastructural support was the primary facilitator for providers; and (3) both patients and providers had largely neutral opinions on how telehealth compares to in-person care but described situations in which telehealth is not appropriate. Conclusions Only 12 sites fit the criteria of high telehealth use in cardiology before COVID-19, and 4 fit the criteria of low use that increased in response to COVID-19. Patients and providers at both site types were largely satisfied using telehealth to manage HF. Understanding best practices for managing ambulatory care-sensitive conditions through virtual visits can help the Veterans Health Administration prepare for long-term impacts of COVID-19 on in-person visits, as well as improve access to care for veterans who live remotely or who have difficulty traveling to in-person appointments.