Gingivoperiosteoplasty in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate: The Need for Alveolar Bone Grafting.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) in preventing alveolar bone grafting (ABG) among children with cleft lip and palate (CLP). DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective university hospital single center study. PATIENTS: Children with CLP treated with GPP from 2000-2015 were included. Those under eight years of age, without definitive conclusions regarding need for ABG or with incomplete data were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Included patients were analyzed for demographics, cleft type, age at GPP, associated cleft surgery, use of nasoalveolar molding (NAM), indication for ABG, operating surgeon and presence of residual alveolar fistula. T-tests and Fisher's exact tests were utilized for statistical analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The need for ABG. RESULTS: Of the 1682 children identified with CLP, 64 underwent GPP and met inclusion criteria. 78% of patients with CLP who underwent GPP were recommended for ABG. Those who received GPP at a younger age (P = .004) and at the time of initial cleft lip repair (P = .022) were less likely to be recommended for ABG. Patients with complete CLP were more likely to be recommended for ABG than patients with cleft lip and alveolus only (P = .015). The operating surgeon impacted the likelihood of ABG (P = .004). Patient gender, race, ethnicity, laterality, and NAM were not significantly associated with recommendation for ABG. CONCLUSION: GPP does not preclude the need for ABG. Therefore, the success of ABG after GPP and maxillary growth restriction should be analyzed further to determine if GPP is a worthwhile adjunct to ABG in cleft care.

American Indian and Alaska Native Accessibility to Comprehensive Cleft Lip and Palate Treatment.

American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) have the highest incidence of cleft lip and palate (orofacial clefts [OFCs]) when compared to other ethnic groups. We aim to determine the AI/AN populations' proximity and accessibility to American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association accredited centers (ACPA centers) for treatment of OFCs. Our hypothesis is an unacceptable proportion of the AI/AN population lacks reasonable accessibility to ACPA centers and comprehensive craniofacial care.A cross-sectional study of ACPA centers and AI/AN populations were analyzed for possible disparities.ACPA centers were mapped using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and compared with 2018 census population data and 2017 Tribal Census Tract data to visually display possible disparities. Total annual potential pediatric cleft care need for selected high-density AI/AN populated lands were estimated.GIS mapping demonstrates geographical isolation of AI/AN populations from ACPA centers. Two states with high AI/AN populated lands (ND, WY) have no ACPA centers. 47.1% of ACPA centers in high AI/AN populated lands have no craniofacial trained surgeons versus 78.9% craniofacial staffed ACPA centers nationally. The potential unmet cleft and craniofacial care need in selected high-density AI/AN populated lands is 1042 children.AI/AN populations are likely underserved by ACPA centers and by craniofacial fellowship-trained staffed centers. Not addressing OFCs with comprehensive care can lead to worsened outcomes and further marginalization of these children. With future studies, we will be capable of making data-driven, informed decisions to more effectively ensure AI/AN access to comprehensive cleft and craniofacial care.

Early Cleft Lip Repair: Demonstrating Efficacy in the First 100 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and/or palate affects approximately one in 700 live births. Optimal timing for repair of cleft lip has yet to be objectively validated. Earlier repair takes advantage of a high degree of plasticity within the nasal cartilage and maxilla. The authors present patients enrolled in an early cleft lip repair protocol facilitating effective repair of the cleft lip and nostril. METHODS: American Society of Anesthesiologists class I to II patients with unilateral cleft lip and/or palate undergoing repair before 3 months of age were enrolled over 5 years. Perioperative data, surgical and anesthetic complications, preoperative and postoperative nostril breadth, nostril width, nasal angle, lip length, frontal nasal breadth, and commissure length measured as ratios between the cleft and noncleft sides were abstracted. Early cleft lip repair and nasoalveolar molding patients were matched for cleft lip severity using the cleft width ratios and compared. RESULTS: The surgical and anesthetic complication rate for 100 early cleft lip repair patients was 2 percent. Operative and anesthetic times were 123 ± 37 minutes and 177 ± 34 minutes, respectively. Hospital length of stay was 1 ± 0 day. Age at repair between early cleft lip repair and nasoalveolar molding was 33 ± 15 days and 118 ± 33 days, respectively. After early cleft lip repair, preoperative to postoperative distance from symmetry for all anthropomorphic measurements improved ( p < 0.001). Comparing severity-matched early cleft lip repair to nasoalveolar molding patients, similar improvements were observed, suggesting equivalent results ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Early cleft lip repair provides an efficacious method for correcting the cleft lip and nasal deformity that simulates nasoalveolar molding. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Cerebral Bypass Using the Descending Branch of the Lateral Circumflex Femoral Artery: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: When performing extracranial to intracranial (EC-IC) and intracranial to intracranial (IC-IC) bypass, the choice of donor vessel and interposition graft depends on several factors: vessel size and accessibility, desired blood flow augmentation, revascularization site anatomy, and pathology. The descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery (DLCFA) is an attractive conduit for cerebrovascular bypass. OBJECTIVE: To present our institutional experience using DLCFA grafts for cerebral revascularization. METHODS: Retrospective review of perioperative data and outcomes for patients undergoing cerebrovascular bypass surgery using a DLCFA graft from 2016 to 2019. RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients underwent EC-IC bypass using a DLCFA interposition graft. Bypass indications included 13 (65%) intracranial aneurysms, 4 (20%) medically refractory atherosclerotic large artery occlusions (internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery), 2 (10%) internal carotid artery dissections, and 1 (5%) patient with moyamoya disease. Most commonly, a donor superior temporal artery was bypassed to a recipient middle cerebral artery (14 of 20; 70%). Two cases demonstrated graft spasm. Graft occlusion occurred in one patient and was asymptomatic. Perioperative bypass surgery-related ischemia occurred in 3 patients: 1 patient with insufficient bypass flow, 1 patient with graft stenosis because of an adventitial band, and 1 patient with focal status epilepticus in the bypassed territory resulting in cortical ischemia. One donor site hematoma occurred. The median (range) modified Rankin scale (mRS) score on follow-up was 1.5 (1-4) at 7.8 (1-27) months, with most patients achieving good functional outcomes (mRS ≤2). CONCLUSION: The DLCFA is a versatile graft for cerebral revascularization surgery, demonstrating good outcomes with minimal graft harvest site morbidity and an acceptable graft patency rate.

Orthognathic Surgery Rate in Cleft Care.

PURPOSE: To determine the true need for orthognathic surgery in patients with repaired cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) at a high-volume craniofacial center. METHODS: An institutional retrospective review of patients with CL/P born between 1975 and 2008 was performed. Patients with adequate documentation reflecting cleft care who were ≥ 18 years at the time of last craniofacial/dentistry follow-up were included. Patients with non-paramedian clefts or a comorbid craniofacial syndrome were excluded. Primary outcome variable was the total proportion of patients with CL/P who either underwent or were referred for orthognathic surgery Le Fort I (LF1) to correct midface hypoplasia. Secondary outcome variables were associations between cleft phenotype, midface hypoplasia severity, and number of cleft related surgeries with the eventual LF1 referral/recipiency. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven patients with CL/P met inclusion criteria. A total of 90/177 (51%) patients underwent corrective LF1; however, 110/177 (62%) of patients were referred for surgery. Patients with secondary cleft palate involvement were referred for and underwent LF1 at significantly greater rates than those without secondary palate involvement (referred: 65% versus 13%, P = 0.001; underwent: 55% versus 0%, P < 0.001). Patients with bilateral cleft lip/palate were referred for and underwent LF1 at significantly higher rates than those with unilateral cleft lip/palate (referred: 71.0% versus 50.4%, P= 0.04; underwent: 84% versus 71%, P = 0.02). Number of secondary palate surgeries was positively correlated with increased LF1 referral (P = 0.02) but not LF1 recipiency (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of orthognathic surgery redundant in patients with repaired CL/P was 51% at our institution, marginally above the higher end of previously reported rates. However, this number is an underrepresentation of the true requirement for LF1 as 62% of patients were referred for surgical intervention of midface hypoplasia. This distinction should be considered when counseling families.

Assessing the Safety of a Novel Neonatal Anesthesia Protocol: A Review of 101 Patients With Early Cleft Lip Repair.

PURPOSE: Our study introduces a novel anesthetic protocol for neonates without using volatile agents with the goal to minimize potentially neurotoxic and pro-apoptotic agents. The authors evaluated the short-term safety and efficacy of our anesthetic protocol in patients undergoing early cleft lip repair (ECLR). METHODS: A retrospective review of ECLR patients who underwent repair before 2.5 months of age within the last 4.3 years was performed. This sample was comprised of 2 groups, those who received either a standard volatile gas-based regimen or a dexmedetomidine-based neonatal anesthetic protocol (DBNAP). Patient demographics, medication dosing, anesthetic time (induction to extubation), major and minor complications, and medication side effects were compared between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients underwent ECLR. All patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 or 2. Mean age at surgery was 31 ±â€Š13 days and mean anesthetic time was 179 ±â€Š36 minutes. DBNAP was used in 65 patients while the standard anesthetic protocol was used in 36 patients. Patient weight was significantly lower in the DBNAP group (4.01 ±â€Š0.61 versus 4.38 ±â€Š0.72 kg, P  = 0.007). There were no significant differences between the 2 cohorts when comparing anesthetic time, emergence time, complication rate, or medication side effects. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing ECLR, DBNAP is perioperatively equivalent to the anesthetic standard of care, demonstrating no major complications and acceptable rates of minor complications and medication side effects.

Cleft Lip and Palate: Le Fort I Distraction Using an Internal Device.

Maxillary hypoplasia is a commonly seen dentofacial anomaly in patients with cleft lip and palate after surgical repair of the cleft anomaly. To facilitate large horizontal movements of the maxilla, distraction osteogenesis is used to slowly stretch the soft tissue envelope with the skeletal advancement preventing tissue recoil and skeletal relapse. Internal distraction devices have the advantage of reducing the amount of physical and psychological stress placed on patients, families, and caregivers. The technique has been successful in producing stable results for large advancements of the facial skeleton when compared with conventional Le Fort I advancement and fixation of the maxilla.

Postoperative helmet therapy following fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling in patients with unilateral coronal synostosis.

Out of all the synostotic corrective surgeries, fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling for patients with unilateral coronal synostosis is one of the hardest to maintain symmetric and proportional correction without some amount of relapse. Over the course of 20 years operating on these patients, the senior author has made multiple adjustments to compensate for relapse asymmetry, including overcorrection on the affected side, increased points of fixation, periosteal release, and scalp expansion with galeal scoring to minimize tension of the closure. As a result of these interventions, we have seen improved immediate results following surgery. However, we have continued to note clinically significant relapse postoperatively. As such, we have started to implement postoperative helmet therapy (PHT) to help maintain the surgical correction, improve secondary brachycephaly, and increase overall symmetry. PHT is a reasonable low-risk complement to fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remolding. Clinically, PHT appears to help minimize relapse and improve overall head symmetry. Further investigation and increased patient enrollment are required to determine the true benefits of PHT in this patient population.

Nasoalveolar Molding: Assessing the Burden of Care.

ABSTRACT: Over the last 3 years a shift at our institution has taken place in which patients who would have been offered nasoalveolar molding (NAM) as an adjunct to cleft lip repair (repair after 3 months) have instead undergone early cleft lip repair (ECLR) (2-5 weeks of life) without NAM. This study sought to examine the financial and social impact of the transition away from NAM to ECLR. The efficacy of NAM is limited by patient compliance to a rigorous treatment schedule requiring weekly visits for appliance adjustments. Nasoalveolar molding patients required an average of 11 dental visits, accounting for $2132 in indirect lost income per family. Average direct charges for NAM totaled $12,290 for the hospital, physician, and appliance costs. Over the entire study period, the cumulative direct cost of NAM separate from the surgical repair of the lip was $970,910. Following the introduction of ECLR as an alternative to NAM with standard lip repair, NAM usage decreased by 48% and unilateral cleft lip patients undergoing NAM decreased by 86%. Those diverted from NAM to ECLR resulted in a decreased healthcare cost burden of $368,700 ($111,727 per year). In addition to the time burden, the financial burden of NAM is significant. Early cleft lip repair without NAM is more cost effective. Nasoalveolar molding has significantly decreased utilization since the implementation of ECLR. We believe that ECLR, with increased experience, long-term data, and increased awareness, has the potential to decrease the burden of health care costs in the United States.

A Meta-Analysis of Palatal Repair Timing.

ABSTRACT: Developing midface hypoplasia is common after palatoplasty and has been hypothesized to be influenced by the timing of hard palate repair. This meta-analysis assesses the risk of developing midface hypoplasia based on age at hard palate repair. A Pubmed PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis was completed for literature focused on palatoplasty and midface hypoplasia published between 1970 and 2019. Cephalometric data were extracted and categorized by age at hard palate repair: <6, 7 to 12, 13 to 18, 19 to 24, and 25 to 83 months. Analysis of these groups and a control were compared using independent T-tests and Spearman correlation coefficients. SNA angles for each group were 77.9 ±â€Š3.1° (<6 months), 77.7 ±â€Š4.2° (7-12 months), 78.7 ±â€Š4.2° (13-18 months), 75.1 ±â€Š4.2° (19-24 months), 75.5 ±â€Š4.8° (25-83 months), and were statistically different than the control group 82.4 ±â€Š3.5° (P < 0.0001). Hard palate repair at 13 to 18 months had a statistically significant greater SNA angle than all other groups except for the repair at <6 months group (P = 0.074). As age at hard palate closure increased beyond 18 months, the SNA decreased, corresponding to a more hypoplastic maxilla (Spearman's correlation coefficient -0.381, P = 0.015). Analysis suggests that younger age at the time of repair is less likely to create in midface hypoplasia in adulthood. Minimizing midface hypoplasia in cleft palate patients by optimizing algorithms of care is a practical way to decrease the burden of disease on patients, families and medical systems. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of technique on outcomes.Level of Evidence: IV.

Is Le Fort I Distraction Enough to Treat Severe Midface Hypoplasia?

BACKGROUND: In severe cases of maxillary hypoplasia, Le Fort I distraction may be required for treatment. This study describes our experience with internal distraction devices and assesses our outcomes in patients with a negative overjet on average >15 mm. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with a history of cleft lip and/or palate who underwent Le Fort I distraction at our institution from 11/2007-11/2017 was performed. Data regarding demographics, procedural details and outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty patients, 13 (65.0%) male and 7 (30.0%) female, were included. All (100%) patients had a history of cleft lip and/or palate and 2 (10.0%) of them had associated syndromes. All 20 patients underwent internal distraction. The average age at surgery was 17.8 years (range 15.2-20.7, SD 1.6 years). The average preoperative negative overjet was 19.27 mm (range 10-30, SD 5.63 mm). The mean total distraction length was 15.3 mm (range 0-30, SD 6.72 mm). There were no intraoperative complications, however, there were a total of 4 (20.0%) postoperative complications, 2 of which required reoperation due to device malfunction or displacement. 14 (70.0%) patients had repeat procedures to complete occlusal correction or correct relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary distraction alone was insufficient for correction of maxillary discrepancies averaging >15 mm. Instead, it's utility may be in positioning the maxilla for a more viable final advancement and fixation procedure, rather than being solely responsible for achieving normal occlusion during distraction.

An Expert Consensus Study for Informed Consent in Primary Breast Augmentation Surgery.

BACKGROUND: What constitutes adequate information for decision-making and informed consent is a practical question appropriately answered with deference to expertise. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were: (1) to establish consensus on a procedure-specific core information set of essential informed consent information by relevant medical experts for primary breast augmentation surgery; and (2) to define from the clinical perspective the data source and imminence elements of evidence-based risk communication. METHODS: The study followed a modified Delphi expert consensus model. Active members of The Aesthetic Society were identified as the relevant clinician experts and were recruited by email. Survey round 1 was informed by a scoping review of the relevant scientific and gray literature. Round 2 was informed by the initial survey round. Consensus was defined a priori as a 75% majority rating. RESULTS: Expert consensus of essential information was achieved for 16 risk items, 1 risk factor, and 8 expectations-including benefits and burdens-along with clarification of clinically appropriate options to present to all patients considering primary implant-based breast augmentation surgery. A basic, procedure-specific, structure for evidence-based risk data is also described. CONCLUSIONS: This paper reports results for the first phase of a larger pilot study aiming to develop a patient decision aid to replace traditional informed consent documents for the specified procedure. Implications for practice are encouraging in terms of reducing unwanted variation in disclosure practices and information overload.

A Review of Hand Feminization and Masculinization Techniques in Gender Affirming Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Anatomical characteristics that are incongruent with an individual's gender identity can cause significant gender dysphoria. Hands exhibit prominent dimorphic sexual features, but despite their visibility, there are limited studies examining gender affirming procedures for the hands. This review is intended to cover the anatomical features that define masculine and feminine hands, the surgical and non-surgical approaches for feminization and masculinization of the hand, and to adapt established aesthetic hand techniques for gender affirming care. METHODS: The authors performed a comprehensive database search of PubMed, Embase OVID and SCOPUS to identify articles on the characterization of masculine or feminine hands, hand treatments related to gender affirmation, and articles related to techniques for hand masculinization and feminization in the non-transgender population. RESULTS: From 656 possibly relevant articles, 42 met the inclusion criteria for the current literature search. There is currently no medical literature specifically exploring the surgical or non-surgical options for hand gender affirmation. The available techniques for gender affirming procedures discussed in this paper are appropriated from those more commonly used for hand rejuvenation. CONCLUSION: There is a dearth of literature addressing the options for transgender individuals seeking gender affirming procedures of the hand. Though established procedures used for hand rejuvenation may be utilized in gender affirming care, further study is required to determine relative salience of various hand features to gender dysphoria in transgender patients of various identities, as well as development of novel techniques to meet these needs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. .

Vertical Distraction for the Treatment of Congenital Syngnathia.

Congenital syngnathia is a very rare condition that presents with several unique challenges. There is no consensus on the best operative approach to manage this condition. Readhesion of surgically separated tissues is a relatively common occurrence. The authors propose that the use of a vertical distraction technique helps maintain adequate separation to prevent relapse of the bony fusion. Long-term follow-up will be required to follow mandibular growth and implications of this treatment option.

Simultaneous Midface Advancement and Orthognathic Surgery: A Powerful Technique for Managing Midface Hypoplasia and Malocclusion.

BACKGROUND: Midface hypoplasia dramatically affects the normative facial cascade. Simultaneous Le Fort III and Le Fort I procedures (Le Fort III/I) provide a powerful tool for achieving significant midface advancement. This study presents the authors' approach for addressing midface hypoplasia in the setting of class III malocclusion using Le Fort III/I advancement. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of patients who underwent Le Fort III/I advancement at the authors' institution from 2009 to 2019. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative data were recorded. The authors' operative technique and surgical pearls are described. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria, 15 male patients (60 percent) and 10 female patients (40 percent). Patient age ranged from 14.9 to 21.6 years. Diagnoses included Crouzon syndrome, nonsyndromic developmental skeletal dysplasia, cleft lip/palate, Klippel-Feil syndrome, Apert syndrome, Van den Ende-Gupta syndrome, and Pfeiffer syndrome. Le Fort III advancements averaged 6.18 ± 1.38 mm and Le Fort I advancements averaged 6.70 ± 2.48 mm. Thirteen patients underwent simultaneous bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with average movement of 5.85 ± 1.21 mm. Average follow-up was 1.3 ± 1.0 years. One patient experienced intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak that resolved with expectant management. Three patients experienced major complications (12 percent) postoperatively necessitating repeated orthognathic operations. Ten patients experienced minor complications (40 percent). Average length of stay was 10 days, with all patients achieving improvement of their facial profile. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' experience reaffirms the relative safety of simultaneous Le Fort III/I advancement. This technique should be considered in select patients with global midface retrusion and class III malocclusion. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Safety/Efficacy of New Topical Silicone Formulation with Selective Growth Factors for Treating Striae Distensae.

Striae distensae (SD) are linear dermal scars that arise from progressive stretching or tearing of the dermal layer. This study tests the safety and efficacy of a topical formulation of silicone-based scar cream containing selective synthetic recombinant human growth factors, hyaluronic acid, and vitamin C to improve overall appearance and texture of SD. Twenty-two subjects with SD alba were recruited and randomized to apply the topical formula to half of their SD laterally twice a day for 1 month. Patient surveys were obtained at 1 month for overall appearance, texture, and tolerability. Three-dimensional imaging was obtained at baseline and at 1 month and submitted to independent evaluators for grading on overall appearance. Subjects reported improved texture and appearance in 86.4% of SD. Subjects reported 100% of untreated SD to have no change in overall appearance or texture. 90.9% of subjects reported no tolerability issues. 9.1% of the treated group reported mild issues such as slight itching or redness the first day of application, which subsided in 2 days for all patients. Independent evaluators indicated improvement in 72.7% of SD in comparison to improvement in 36.3% of untreated SD. This study demonstrates that the investigated topical formulation is safe and effective to use for SD.

Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons Regarding Informed Consent.

BACKGROUND: Best practice for informed consent in aesthetic plastic surgery is a process of shared decision-making, yet evidence strongly suggests this is not commonly reflected in practice nor is it supported by traditional informed consent documents (ICD). Falsely held beliefs by clinicians about shared decision-making may contribute to its lack of adoption. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to understand the baseline attitudes, beliefs, and practices of informed consent among board-certified plastic surgeons with a primarily aesthetics practice. METHODS: A 15-question online survey was emailed to active members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Items included demographics, Likert scales, free-text, acceptability, and 1 question seeking consensus on general information all patients must understand before any surgery. RESULTS: This survey yielded a 13% response rate with a 52% completion rate across 10 countries and 31 US states. A total of 69% were very or extremely confident that ICD contain evidence-based information, but 63% were not at all or not so confident in ICD effectiveness of prompting patients to teach-back essential information. A total of 50% believed surgical ICD should be reviewed annually. Eighty-six percent reported assistance with patient education during informed consent. Members of professional plastic surgery societies should be a source of evidence for content (free-text). A total of 64% were somewhat to very satisfied with the survey and 84% will probably to definitely participate in future related surveys. CONCLUSIONS: The findings echo concerns in the literature that ICD are focused on disclosure instead of patient understanding. There is notable concern regarding information overload and retention but less regarding the quality and completeness of information. Current culture suggests key clinician stakeholders are amenable to change.