Socioeconomic determinants of racial disparities in survival outcomes among patients with renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Racially driven outcomes in cancer are challenging to study. Studies evaluating the impact of race in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) outcomes are inconsistent and unable to disentangle socioeconomic disparities from inherent biological differences. We therefore seek to investigate socioeconomic determinants of racial disparities with respect to overall survival (OS) when comparing Black and White patients with RCC. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients diagnosed with RCC between 2004 and 2017 with complete clinicodemographic data. Patients were examined across various stages (all, cT1aN0M0, and cM1) and subtypes (all, clear cell, or papillary). We performed Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustment for socioeconomic and disease factors. RESULTS: There were 386,589 patients with RCC, of whom 46,507 (12.0%) were Black. Black patients were generally younger, had more comorbid conditions, less likely to be insured, in a lower income quartile, had lower rates of high school completion, were more likely to have papillary RCC histology, and more likely to be diagnosed at a lower stage of RCC than their white counterparts. By stage, Black patients demonstrated a 16% (any stage), 22.5% (small renal mass [SRM]), and 15% (metastatic) higher risk of mortality than White patients. Survival differences were also evident in histology-specific subanalyses. Socioeconomic factors played a larger role in predicting OS among patients with SRMs than in patients with metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients with RCC demonstrate worse survival outcomes compared to White patients across all stages. Socioeconomic disparities between races play a significant role in influencing survival in RCC.

Evaluation of Growth Rates for Small Renal Masses in Elderly Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance.

Background: As the adoption of active surveillance (AS) for small renal masses (SRMs) grows, the number of elderly patients enrolled for a prolonged period of time will increase. However, our understanding of comparative growth rates (GRs) in aging patients with SRMs remains poor. Objective: To examine whether particular age cutoffs are associated with an increased GR for patients undergoing AS for SRMs. Design setting and participants: We identified all patients with SRMs enrolled in the multi-institutional, prospective Delayed Intervention and Surveillance for Small Renal Masses (DISSRM) registry since 2009 who elected for AS. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Two definitions of GR were examined: GR from the initial image (GRi) and GR from the prior image (GRp). Image measurements were dichotomized based on patient age at the time of imaging. Multiple age cutoffs were examined: 65, 70, 75, and 80 yr. Mixed-effect linear regression examined the associations between age and GR, with controlling to account for multiple measurements from the same individual. Results and limitations: We examined 2542 measurements from 571 patients. The median age at enrollment was 70.9 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 63.2-77.4) with a median tumor diameter of 1.8 cm (IQR 1.4-2.5). As a continuous variable, age was not associated with GRi (-0.0001 cm/yr, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.007 to 0.007, p = 0.97) or GRp (0.008 cm/yr, 95% CI -0.004 to 0.020, p = 0.17) after adjustment. The only age thresholds associated with an increased GR were 65 yr for GRi and 70 yr for GRp. Limitations include the one-dimensional nature of the measurements used. Conclusions: Increased age for patients on AS for SRMs is not associated with increased GRs. Patient summary: We examined whether patients undergoing active surveillance (AS) exhibited accelerated growth of their small renal masses (SRMs) after a certain age. No demonstrable change was seen, suggesting that AS is a safe and durable management option for aging patients with SRMs.