Perineal-First Approach in Robotic Abdominoperineal Resection.

INTRODUCTION: Although abdominoperineal resection (APR) is required for rectal cancer invading the levator ani muscle, its curative outcomes remain poorer than those of other rectal surgeries.1-3 In particular, the anatomic complexity around the anterior wall of the rectum increases the technical difficulty during APR, resulting in a high frequency of margin involvement that causes local recurrence. In this video, we present the technical details of a robotic perineal-first APR approach. METHODS: For a 46 year-old man, locally advanced rectal cancer invading the levator ani muscles was diagnosed. Although total neoadjuvant therapy (8 cycles of induction FOLFOXIRI followed by chemoradiotherapy 50.4 Gy) decreased the tumor size, invasion was suspected still to remain. Therefore, robotic APR was performed. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient. For the perineal-first approach, we created a circular incision around the anus, then divided the fat tissues of the ischiorectal fossa until the levator ani muscle was exposed on both sides. Posterior and anterior dissections were performed along the coccyx and external anal sphincter, respectively. After placement of a lap protector to maintain air-tightness, the robotic approach was initiated. Posterior dissection was performed along the coccyx, then was connected to the already-dissected space created earlier by the perineal approach. Next, the levator ani muscle was divided from the dorsal to the lateral side. Finally, anterior dissection was performed along the prostate, followed by division of the rectourethral muscle, the smooth muscle fibers running vertically. The creation of the already-dissected space on the perineal side offers advantages of robotic manipulation from the abdominal side, especially anterior dissection. RESULTS: We performed robotic APR using the perineal-first approach for 17 consecutive patients (12 men and 5 women) between 2019 and 2023. All 17 patients achieved complete total mesorectal excision with negative margins. The mean time required for the perineal approach was about 25 min. In anterior dissection using the robotic approach, division of the smooth muscle fibers at the perineal body (i.e., rectourethral muscle in males4 or muscular intermingling in females5) was reproducibly performed in both males and females. CONCLUSION: Robotic APR with a perineal-first approach can be advantageous in ensuring surgical margin safety (especially for the anterior aspect of the rectum).

ctDNA-based molecular residual disease and survival in resectable colorectal cancer.

The interim analysis of the CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY observational study demonstrated the association of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based molecular residual disease (MRD) detection with recurrence risk and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in resectable colorectal cancer (CRC). This updated analysis with a 23-month median follow-up, including 2,240 patients with stage II-III colon cancer or stage IV CRC, reinforces the prognostic value of ctDNA positivity during the MRD window with significantly inferior disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio (HR): 11.99, P < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS; HR: 9.68, P < 0.0001). In patients who experienced recurrence, ctDNA positivity correlated with shorter OS (HR: 2.71, P < 0.0001). The significantly shorter DFS in MRD-positive patients was consistent across actionable biomarker subsets. Sustained ctDNA clearance in response to ACT was an indicator of favorable DFS and OS compared to transient clearance (24-month DFS: 89.0% versus 3.3%; 24-month OS: 100.0% versus 82.3%). True spontaneous clearance rate with no clinical recurrence was 1.9% (2/105). Overall, our findings provide evidence for the utility of ctDNA monitoring for post-resection recurrence and mortality risk stratification that could be used for guiding adjuvant therapy.

The urinary tract reconstruction in a robot-assisted surgery for rectal malignancy with combined prostate and seminal vesicle resection.

INTRODUCTION: In certain cases of rectal malignancy in which invasion is confined to the prostate and/or seminal vesicles, bladder-sparing surgery may be chosen instead of total pelvic exenteration. However, even if the bladder is preserved, postoperative urinary dysfunction and vesicourethral anastomotic leakage are concern. MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: We employ various techniques based on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for reconstructing the urinary tract. These techniques include advanced reconstruction of vesicourethral support, total anatomical reconstruction, and a method called anterior reconstruction. In addition, suture fixation of bladder to the anterior abdominal wall, and re-approximation of bladder by peritoneal suture were done. DISCUSSION: Reliable robot-assisted vesicourethral anastomosis and reinforcement of the anastomotic wall could potentially enhance the self-voiding rate and decrease the risk of anastomotic failure.

Robotic versus open and laparoscopic pelvic exenterations for pelvic cancer: a multicenter propensity-matched analysis in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is the last resort for achieving a complete cure for pelvic cancer; however, it is burdensome for patients. Minimally invasive surgeries, including robot-assisted surgery, have been widely used to treat malignant tumors and have also recently been used in PE. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted PE (RPE) by comparing the outcomes of open PE (OPE) with those of conventional laparoscopic PE (LPE) for treating pelvic tumors. METHODS: Following the ethics committee approval, a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration between January 2012 and October 2022 was conducted. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were collected. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed to minimize group selection bias. RESULTS: In total, 261 patients met the study criteria, of whom 61 underwent RPE, 90 underwent OPE, and 110 underwent LPE. After propensity score matching, 50 pairs were created for RPE and OPE and 59 for RPE and LPE. RPE was associated with significantly less blood loss (RPE vs. OPE: 408 mL vs. 2385 ml, p < 0.001), lower transfusion rate (RPE vs. OPE: 32% vs. 82%, p < 0.001), and lower rate of complications over Clavien-Dindo grade II (RPE vs. OPE: 48% vs. 74%, p = 0.013; RPE vs. LPE: 48% vs. 76%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This multicenter study suggests that RPE reduces blood loss and transfusion compared with OPE and has a lower rate of complications compared with OPE and LPE in patients with locally advanced and recurrent pelvic tumors.

Monitoring ctDNA RAS Mutational Status in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Trial Protocol of RAS-trace and RAS-trace-2 Studies.

Background: Spatial and temporal heterogeneities of RAS and other molecular genes should be considered in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs); acquired RAS mutation is sometimes observed at disease progression of treatment with the anti-EGFR mAb. At the same time, discrepancy of RAS status from tissues and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the same patient is sometimes observed. Based on this, we commenced two observational studies to clarify these heterogeneities of RAS and BRAF in mCRC, using next generation sequencing from liquid biopsy. Methods/Design: RAS-trace study is an observational study to monitor ctDNA RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA status every 4-12 weeks using the Plasma-SeqSensei™ CRC RUO Kit (Sysmex Inostics GmbH) in mCRC with RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt) on tumor tissue. The primary endpoint was the time to the acquired RAS mutations. A total of 42 patients has been accrued. RAS-trace-2 study is also an observational study aimed at comparing the efficacy of the anti-EGFR mAb in ctDNA RAS/BRAF wt with ctDNA RAS or BRAF mutant mCRC patients, whose RAS/BRAF are wt in tumor tissue. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in patients with ctDNA RAS/BRAF wt and RAS or BRAF mutant. A total of 240 patients will be accrued over 2 years. Discussion: These trials will help us understanding the clinical significance of spatial and temporal heterogeneities of RAS, BRAF and other genes, while optimizing the anti-EGFR mAb treatment strategies in mCRC.

Baseline ctDNA gene alterations as a biomarker of survival after panitumumab and chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Certain genetic alterations and right-sided primary tumor location are associated with resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor (EGFR) treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The phase 3 PARADIGM trial (n = 802) demonstrated longer overall survival with first-line anti-EGFR (panitumumab) versus antivascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) plus modified FOLFOX6 in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC with left-sided primary tumors. This prespecified exploratory biomarker analysis of PARADIGM (n = 733) evaluated the association between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) gene alterations and efficacy outcomes, focusing on a broad panel of gene alterations associated with resistance to EGFR inhibition, including KRAS, NRAS, PTEN and extracellular domain EGFR mutations, HER2 and MET amplifications, and ALK, RET and NTRK1 fusions. Overall survival was prolonged with panitumumab plus modified FOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab plus modified FOLFOX6 in patients with ctDNA that lacked gene alterations in the panel (that is, negative hyperselected; median in the overall population: 40.7 versus 34.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.92) but was similar or inferior with panitumumab in patients with ctDNA that contained any gene alteration in the panel (19.2 versus 22.2 months; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.53), regardless of tumor sidedness. Negative hyperselection using ctDNA may guide optimal treatment selection in patients with mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov registrations: NCT02394834 and NCT02394795 .

Exploratory Biomarker Analysis Using Plasma Angiogenesis-Related Factors and Cell-Free DNA in the TRUSTY Study: A Randomized, Phase II/III Study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab as Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The TRUSTY study evaluated the efficacy of second-line trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). OBJECTIVE: This exploratory biomarker analysis of TRUSTY investigated the relationship between baseline plasma concentrations of angiogenesis-related factors and cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and the efficacy of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab in patients with mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between baseline plasma samples of patients with high and low plasma concentrations (based on the median value) of angiogenesis-related factors. Correlations between cfDNA concentrations and PFS were assessed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics (n = 65) were as follows: male/female, 35/30; median age, 64 (range 25-84) years; and RAS status wild-type/mutant, 29/36. Patients in the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-low and interleukin (IL)-8-low groups had a significantly higher DCR (risk ratio [95% confidence intervals {CIs}]) than patients in the HGF-high (1.83 [1.12-2.98]) and IL-8-high (1.70 [1.02-2.82]) groups. PFS (hazard ratio {HR} [95% CI]) was significantly longer in patients in the HGF-low (0.33 [0.14-0.79]), IL-8-low (0.31 [0.14-0.70]), IL-6-low (0.19 [0.07-0.50]), osteopontin-low (0.39 [0.17-0.88]), thrombospondin-2-low (0.42 [0.18-0.98]), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1-low (0.26 [0.10-0.67]) groups versus those having corresponding high plasma concentrations of these angiogenesis-related factors. No correlation was observed between cfDNA concentration and PFS. CONCLUSION: Low baseline plasma concentrations of HGF and IL-8 may predict better DCR and PFS in patients with mCRC receiving FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab, however further studies are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs031180122.

Colorectal cancer in adolescent and young adults: epidemiology in Japan and narrative review.

Background and Objective: Although only a small proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases develop in adolescents and young adults (AYAs), its incidence has increased recently. We aimed to conduct a narrative literature review and summarize the epidemiology, clinicopathological features, genetics, and treatments for AYA-CRCs. Methods: We searched the articles published in the PubMed database until November 30, 2022, with keywords, "((adolescent and young adult) OR AYA) AND ((colorectal cancer) OR (colon cancer) OR (rectal cancer))" and "young-onset AND ((colorectal cancer) OR (colon cancer) OR (rectal cancer))". Key Content and Findings: In Japan, the annual incidence of AYA-CRC was approximately 1,200 in the 1970s, but has increased to 2,000 nowadays. An increased incidence of AYA-CRC has also been reported in other countries. AYA-CRC tends to be a more advanced disease at presentation than CRC in older patients, with more adverse histological features and variability in molecular characteristics. Diagnosis of CRC is often delayed in AYAs because they are not invited to undergo cancer screening. Three to five percent of patients with AYA-CRC have hereditary cancer syndromes such as Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and a family history should be obtained. Additionally, providing information on fertility preservation and social systems before starting treatment is important for sustainable treatment and life after cancer treatment. Conclusions: The number of AYA-CRC cases is increasing in Japan. Before initiating treatment for AYA-CRC, we should know that these patients may have a hereditary disease and fertility preservation should be explained. More physicians should be aware of the importance of AYA-CRC.

NEXUS trial: a multicenter phase II clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the perioperative use of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab in patients with previously untreated surgically resectable BRAF V600E mutant colorectal oligometastases.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for resectable BRAF V600E mutant colorectal oligometastases (CRM) has not been established due to the rarity and rapid progression of the disease. Since the unresectable recurrence rate is high, development of novel perioperative therapies are warranted. On December 2020, the BEACON CRC triplet regimen of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab was approved for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan. METHODS: The NEXUS trial is a multicenter phase II clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the perioperative use of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab in patients with previously untreated surgically resectable BRAF V600E mutant CRM. The key inclusion criteria are as follows: histologically diagnosed with colorectal adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma; RAS wild-type and BRAF V600E mutation by tissue or blood; and previously untreated resectable distant metastases. The triplet regimen (encorafenib: 300 mg daily; binimetinib: 45 mg twice daily; cetuximab: 400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2 weekly, 28 days/cycle) is administered for 3 cycles each before and after curative resection. The primary endpoint of the study is the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and the secondary end points are the PFS, disease-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate. The sample size is 32 patients. Endpoints in the NEXUS trial as well as integrated analysis with the nationwide registry data will be considered for seeking regulatory approval for the perioperative use of the triplet regimen. DISCUSSION: The use of the triplet regimen in the perioperative period is expected to be safe and effective in patients with resectable BRAF V600E mutant CRM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCT2031220025, April. 16, 2022.

Assessment of Elastic Laminal Invasion Contributes to an Objective pT3 Subclassification in Colon Cancer.

The extent of tumor spread influences on the clinical outcome, and which determine T stage of colorectal cancer. However, pathologic discrimination between pT3 and pT4a in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)-TNM stage is subjective, and more objective discrimination method for deeply invasive advanced colon cancer is mandatory for standardized patient management. Peritoneal elastic laminal invasion (ELI) detected using elastic staining may increase the objective discrimination of deeply invasive advanced colon cancer. In this study, we constructed ELI study group to investigate feasibility, objectivity, and prognostic utility of ELI. Furthermore, pT classification using ELI was investigated based on these data. At first, concordance study investigated objectivity using 60 pT3 and pT4a colon cancers. Simultaneously, a multi-institutional retrospective study was performed to assess ELI's prognostic utility in 1202 colon cancer cases from 6 institutions. In the concordance study, objectivity, represented by κ, was higher in the ELI assessment than in pT classification. In the multi-institutional retrospective study, elastic staining revealed that ELI was a strong prognostic factor. The clinical outcome of pT3 cases with ELI was significantly and consistently worse than that of those without ELI. pT classification into pT3 without ELI, pT3 with ELI, and pT4a was an independent prognostic factor. In this study, we revealed that ELI is an objective method for discriminating deeply invasive advanced colon cancer. Based on its feasibility, objectivity, and prognostic utility, ELI can subdivide pT3 lesions into pT3a (without ELI) and pT3b (with ELI).

Panitumumab vs Bevacizumab Added to Standard First-line Chemotherapy and Overall Survival Among Patients With RAS Wild-type, Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: For patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, adding anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monoclonal antibodies to first-line doublet chemotherapy is routine, but the optimal targeted therapy has not been defined. Objective: To evaluate the effect of adding panitumumab (an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody) vs bevacizumab (an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody) to standard first-line chemotherapy for treatment of RAS wild-type, left-sided, metastatic colorectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial at 197 sites in Japan in May 2015-January 2022 among 823 patients with chemotherapy-naive RAS wild-type, unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (final follow-up, January 14, 2022). Interventions: Panitumumab (n = 411) or bevacizumab (n = 412) plus modified fluorouracil, l-leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) every 14 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point, overall survival, was tested first in participants with left-sided tumors, then in the overall population. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, response rate, duration of response, and curative (defined as R0 status) resection rate. Results: In the as-treated population (n = 802; median age, 66 years; 282 [35.2%] women), 604 (75.3%) had left-sided tumors. Median follow-up was 61 months. Median overall survival was 37.9 months with panitumumab vs 34.3 months with bevacizumab in participants with left-sided tumors (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.82; 95.798% CI, 0.68-0.99; P = .03) and 36.2 vs 31.3 months, respectively, in the overall population (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98; P = .03). Median progression-free survival for panitumumab vs bevacizumab was 13.1 vs 11.9 months, respectively, for those with left-sided tumors (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83-1.20) and 12.2 vs 11.4 months overall (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90-1.24). Response rates with panitumumab vs bevacizumab were 80.2% vs 68.6%, respectively, for left-sided tumors (difference, 11.2%; 95% CI, 4.4%-17.9%) and 74.9% vs 67.3% overall (difference, 7.7%; 95% CI, 1.5%-13.8%). Median duration of response with panitumumab vs bevacizumab was 13.1 vs 11.2 months for left-sided tumors (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.10) and 11.9 vs 10.7 months overall (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.06). Curative resection rates with panitumumab vs bevacizumab were 18.3% vs 11.6% for left-sided tumors; (difference, 6.6%; 95% CI, 1.0%-12.3%) and 16.5% vs 10.9% overall (difference, 5.6%; 95% CI, 1.0%-10.3%). Common treatment-emergent adverse events were acneiform rash (panitumumab: 74.8%; bevacizumab: 3.2%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (panitumumab: 70.8%; bevacizumab: 73.7%), and stomatitis (panitumumab: 61.6%; bevacizumab: 40.5%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, adding panitumumab, compared with bevacizumab, to standard first-line chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival in those with left-sided tumors and in the overall population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02394795.

Is frequent measurement of tumor markers beneficial for postoperative surveillance of colorectal cancer?

PURPOSE: To determine whether frequent measurement of tumor markers triggers early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence. METHODS: Of 1,651 consecutive patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery between 2010 and 2016, 1,050 were included. CEA and CA 19-9 were considered to be postoperative tumor markers and were measured every 3 months for 3 years, and then every 6 months for 2 years. Sensitivity analysis of elevated CEA and CA19-9 levels and multivariate analysis of factors associated with elevated CEA and CA19-9 levels were performed. The proportion of triggers for detecting recurrence was determined. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 5.3 years. After applying the exclusion criteria, 1,050 patients were analyzed, 176 (16.8%) of whom were found to have recurrence. After excluding patients with persistently elevated CEA and CA19-9 levels before and after surgery from the 176 patients, 71 (43.6%) of 163 patients had elevated CEA levels and 35 (20.2%) of 173 patients had elevated CA19-9 levels. Sensitivity/positive predictive values for elevated CEA and CA19-9 levels at recurrence were 43.6%/32.3% and 20.2%/32.4%, respectively. Lymph node metastasis was a factor associated with both elevated CEA and CA19-9 levels at recurrence. Of the 176 patients, computed tomography triggered the detection of recurrence in 137 (78%) and elevated tumor marker levels in 13 (7%); the diagnostic lead interval in the latter 13 patients was 1.7 months. CONCLUSION: Tumor marker measurements in surveillance after radical colorectal cancer resection contribute little to early detection, and frequent measurements are unnecessary for stage I patients with low risk of recurrence.

Multicenter, single-arm, phase II study of the continuous use of panitumumab in combination with FOLFIRI after FOLFOX for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Exploratory sequential examination of acquired mutations in circulating cell-free DNA.

This multicenter single-arm, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of uninterrupted panitumumab usage combined with cytotoxic doublets for unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Additionally, clinical value of the RAS/BRAF mutation status in circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) was evaluated; this evaluation was measured independently of the protocol treatment. Eligible patients with RAS wild-type mCRC who had received the first-line panitumumab plus FOLFOX treatment were recruited and administered continuous panitumumab combined with FOLFIRI. Progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months was the primary endpoint, with threshold and expected values of 35% and 50%, respectively. In total, 54 patients were enrolled between October 2017 and October 2019. The crude 6-month PFS rate was 37.0%, with a 4.8-month median PFS. The response rate and disease control rate were 16.7% and 50.0%, respectively. Notably, of the 54 participants, 17 showed RAS/BRAF mutations until the end of the protocol treatment and of the 22 patients with progressive disease as their best response, 10 possessed RAS/BRAF mutations in their plasma ccfDNA at baseline. The median PFS significantly differed among patients harboring tumors with BRAF and RAS mutations and those with wild-type tumors. In conclusion, our study failed to show the expected efficacy of the continuous panitumumab use in the second-line treatment. Liquid biopsy discriminated the duration of PFS according to the mutation status. The effectiveness of continuous treatment with panitumumab should be evaluated in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC determined by liquid biopsy at the start of the second-line treatment.

The necessity of intensive surveillance colonoscopy for patients with a remaining right colon after resection of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To clarify how often postoperative surveillance colonoscopy should be undertaken based on the risk factors for the development of metachronous cancer (MC) and advanced adenoma (AA) after surgery for colorectal cancer. METHODS: We collected data of consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for primary colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2012, with preoperative colonoscopy and surveillance colonoscopy at 1 year after surgery (406 patients, mean age: 69 years, 59% male). The detection rates of AA (with villous features, > 10 mm or high-grade dysplasia) and MC by surveillance colonoscopy were the primary outcomes. RESULTS: At 5 years, colonoscopy was performed as postoperative surveillance an average of 3.2 times. AA and MC were detected in 57 (14.0%) and 18 patients (4.4%), respectively. Both lesions were more common in the right colon (n = 43) than in the left colon (n = 28). The detection rate did not differ to a statistically significant extent according to the number of colonoscopies performed for surveillance (p = 0.21). However, after left-sided colectomy, both types of lesions were more commonly detected in those who received ≥ 3 colonoscopies than in those with one or two colonoscopies (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: A remaining right colon after left-sided colectomy was associated with a higher risk of developing AA and MC. Physicians should consider performing surveillance colonoscopy more frequently if the right colon remains after surgery.

Phase Ib/II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 in Combination with Bevacizumab for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies (BiTS Study).

LESSONS LEARNED: A biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV schedule in patients with heavily pretreated mCRC showed equivalent efficacy with less toxicity compared with the current schedule of TAS-102 plus BEV combination. Biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV combination could reduce unnecessary dose reduction of TAS-102, maintain higher doses, and possibly be effective even in cases without chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). The prespecified subgroup analysis of this study showed an obvious association between CIN within the first two cycles and prognosis of biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV. BACKGROUND: TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) plus bevacizumab (BEV) combination therapy has shown promising activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the previously reported dose and schedule for the TAS-102 (70 mg/m2 /day on days 1-5 and 8-12, every 4 weeks) plus BEV (5 mg/kg on day 1, every 2 weeks) regimen is complicated by severe hematological toxicities and difficult administration schedules. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a more convenient biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV combination. METHODS: Patients with mCRC who were refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies were enrolled. Patients received biweekly TAS-102 (twice daily on days 1-5, every 2 weeks) with BEV (5mg/kg on day 1, every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 16 weeks (16-w PFS rate). RESULTS: From October 2017 to January 2018, 46 patients were enrolled. The recommended phase II dose was determined to be TAS-102 (70 mg/m2 /day). Of the 44 eligible patients, the 16-w PFS rate was 40.9% (95% confidence interval, 26.3%-56.8%), and the null hypothesis was rejected (p < .0001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 4.29 months and 10.86 months, respectively. Disease control rate was 59.1%. Common grade 3 or higher adverse events were hypertension (40.9%), neutropenia (15.9%), and leucopenia (15.9%). CONCLUSION: Biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV showed promising antitumor activity with safety.

[Appendiceal Goblet Cell Carcinoid Successfully Treated with Bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 Regimen-A Case Report].

A 67-year-old man presented with abdominal distention and vomiting.Computed tomography revealed bowel obstruction due to a cecal tumor.We performed laparoscopic ileocecal resection after decompression with an ileus tube. Intraoperative findings included multiple disseminated nodules on the mesenterium surrounding the cecal tumor.The histopathologic diagnosis was poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, which consisted of glandular proliferation of atypical epithelial cells and dispersed infiltration of goblet cells. Immunohistochemistry showed positively stained neuroendocrine markers, such as CD56, chromogranin, and synaptophysin.The patient was diagnosed with goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix and treated with combination chemotherapy of bevacizumab, fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin.He remained free from progression for over 1 and half years with this treatment.Subsequent chemotherapy was ineffective, and he passed away.There is no established chemotherapy regimen for goblet cell carcinoid, which has the aspects of both adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors.However, the present case suggested the efficacy of the mFOLFOX6 regimen in combination with bevacizumab for appendiceal goblet cell carcinoid.

[Sigmoid Colon Cancer with Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis That Presented with Gastric Perforation].

A 74-year-old man visited his local clinic complaining of abdominal pain that persisted for three days. He was diagnosed with diffuse peritonitis and was transported to our hospital. Contrast computed tomography(CT)showed gastric perforation and a tumor in the sigmoid colon with left obturator lymph node metastasis. He was diagnosed with diffuse peritonitis resulting from gastric perforation and performed emergent surgery. As the size of the gastric perforation was large, we performed distal gastrectomy and transverse colostomy. He was discharged without any complications, and a total of 6 courses of SOX with a bevacizumab regimen were administered postoperatively. CT following chemotherapy showed shrinkage of the lesion. He was admitted again for sigmoidectomy with left lateral lymph node resection and discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 8. We administered 2 courses of SOX regimen after the surgery. He remains alive with no recurrence 27months after the first surgery.

The utility of longitudinal slicing method for rectal specimen: pathological analysis of circumferential resection margin of intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer.

The pathological assessment of the resection margin of rectal cancer is important to predict clinical outcome. The transverse slicing method of rectal specimens is recommended in Western countries. However, in Japan the longitudinal slicing method is traditionally advocated. The aim of this study was to assess the advantages of the longitudinal slicing method. The subjects were 197 consecutive patients with primary rectal cancer who underwent curative intersphincteric resection from 2000 to 2013. The resected rectal specimens were cut into 12 slices in the direction of the long axis. Resection margin was considered positive when it was less than or equal to 1 mm. Resection margin was positive in 23 patients (12%). They were classified into two groups, namely the DEEP group (n = 16, 70%), when the resection margin corresponded to the deepest tumor invasion area, and the ENTRY group (n = 7, 30%), when resection margin was around the initial cutting point of the anal canal. It was shown that resection margin tends to be positive not only in the deepest tumor invasion area but also in the entry area of the anal canal. The longitudinal slicing method may have some advantages for accurate assessment of resection margin especially in low-lying rectal cancer.

The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy in obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is generally reported to increase the risk of surgical complications. There have been few reports of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) in obese patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of (1) LH versus open hepatectomy (OH) in obese patients and (2) LH in obese patients versus LH in non-obese patients. METHODS: We introduced LH at our institution in April 2014. LH was performed in 63 obese patients and 108 non-obese patients from April 2014 to May 2017. OH was performed in 79 obese patients from January 2010 to May 2017. This study retrospectively compared the short-term outcomes of the LH obese group with those of the OH obese group and the LH non-obese group. RESULTS: In patient characteristics, the LH obese group included a significantly higher percentage of patients with liver cirrhosis than the OH obese group. The LH obese group had fewer patients with a history of abdominal surgery but more with liver cirrhosis than the LH non-obese group. For short-term outcomes, the LH obese group had significantly less blood loss, fewer intraoperative transfusions, fewer positive surgical margins, and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the OH obese group. In contrast, only operation time was significantly different (longer) in the LH obese group than in the LH non-obese group. There were no significant differences in morbidity or mortality between the LH obese group and either the OH obese or the LH non-obese groups. CONCLUSION: LH in obese patients is safe and effective.