Dissimilar Sequelae Caused by Single Dental Trauma: A Case Report with Long-Term Follow-up.

Immediate care and accurate diagnosis are essential for treating dental trauma. This report presents a 7-year-old boy suffered a bicycle accident with direct trauma to the mouth and extrusive luxation of teeth #11 and #21. The emergency treatment was performed within the first hour. Clinical examinations showed that both teeth exhibited 3 mm extrusion from comparing their incisal edges to their neighboring teeth, had edematous gingiva, showed grade 3 mobility and were painful to percussion. Radiographic exams showed incomplete root formation, widened periodontal spaces along their entire lengths and absence of bone or root fractures. The treatment consisted of immediate repositioning and semi-rigid splinting. After 15 days, tooth #11 exhibited no clinical signor symptom and tooth #21 was diagnosed with pulp necrosis, with an acute dentoalveolar abscess and intraoral edema. Immediate endodontic treatment was initiated (intracanal dressing with calcium hydroxide paste). At 30 days, another pulp sensibility test was performed on tooth #11, which had a negative response. In the same visit, the intracanal dressing of tooth #21 was replaced. The Ca(OH)2 medication was replaced every 6 months until the formation of an apical barrier. The final dressing consisted of gutta-percha and Grossman's sealer and was placed two and a half years after the first dressing appointment. The extrusive luxation resulted in two different sequelae: complete root obliteration in tooth #11 and anomalous root development after the formation of an apical barrier in tooth #21. The patient received orthodontic treatment after 6 years from the initial treatment with no negative outcome. After 18 years follow-up, both teeth were stabilized with no symptom or sign. It's important to follow the evolution of every trauma case continuously because the sequelae can be unpredictable.

Postoperative pain after single-visit root canal treatments in necrotic teeth comparing instruments' kinematics and apical instrumentation limits - a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: This prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial (PRMCT) investigated postoperative pain after single-visit root canal treatments in teeth affected by pulp necrosis (PN), and asymptomatic apical periodontitis (AAP) (with apical radiolucent areas) or normal periradicular tissues (without apical radiolucent areas) comparing different instruments' kinematics and apical instrumentation limits. METHODS: Before chemomechanical preparation, 240 patients/teeth were randomly distributed into four groups (n = 60) according to the instruments' kinematics (rotary or reciprocating) and apical instrumentation limits (with or without intentional foraminal enlargement [IFE]). After that, specimens were submitted to the same irrigation and obturation techniques, and the patients were referred to undergo the definitive restorations. No medication was prescribed, but the patients were instructed to take either paracetamol (750 mg every 6 h for three days) or ibuprofen (600 mg every 6 h for three days) in pain cases. Postoperative pain incidence and levels were assessed at 24-, 48-, and 72 h following treatment completion according to a verbal rating scale (VRS) following a score. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to assess the normality of the data. Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, Friedman's ANOVA, and Friedman's multiple 2 to 2 comparison tests were employed to identify potential significant statistical differences among the variables in the study groups (P < .05). RESULTS: Significant statistical differences were only observed among the groups considering tooth, periradicular status, and the occurrence of overfilling (sealer extrusion) (P < 0.00). Patients with teeth instrumented through rotary kinematics and without IFE experienced lower rates of postoperative pain; however, this difference was relevant only at 24 h (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative pain was lower after using a rotary file system (Profile 04) inserted up to the apical constriction (AC). However, this finding was just statistically meaningful at 24 h. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This PRMCT was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Paranaense University - UNIPAR, Francisco Beltrão, PR, Brazil (CAAE. 46,774,621.6.0000.0109) on 02/09/2021. It was registered at The Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials - ReBEC (RBR-3r967t) on 01/06/2023, was performed according to the Principles of the Helsinki Declaration and is reported following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Statement.

Cleaning and disinfection of the root canal system provided by four active supplementary irrigation methods.

This in vitro study evaluated the bacterial reduction provided by the EndoActivator (EA), Easy Clean (EC), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and XP-Endo Finisher. Eight-four mesial roots of mandibular first molars were instrumented, inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis, and divided into four groups (n. 20). Bacterial reduction in the main canals and dentinal tubules were respectively determined by MTT assays and Live/Dead BackLight technique through confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) at 50, 100, and 150 µm in-depth (n. 10 per group). Statistical analyses were conducted following a significance level of 95% (P < 0.05). A significant statistical difference was just identified between XPF and EC in the main canals. In the dentinal tubules from the main root canals, at 100 and 150 µm in-depths, significant statistical differences were only observed between XPF and EC (P = 0.027) for the former and between XPF and EC (P = 0.011) and XPF and PUI (P = 0.021) for the latter. In the dentinal tubules from the isthmus, at 100 µm in-depth, statistically relevant differences did occur between XPF and EC (P = 0.038) and EC and EA (P = 0.029). At 150 µm in-depth, these differences were only significant by comparing XPF and PUI (P = 0.025) and XPF and EC (P = 0.036). Although no irrigation method could thoroughly disinfect the RCS, bacterial reduction indexes were generally better after using XPF.