The Efficacy of a Home-Based, Augmented Reality Dual-Task Platform for Cognitive-Motor Training in Elderly Patients: A Pilot Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study introduces a novel home-based dual-task platform incorporating augmented reality (AR), COGNIMO, aimed at simultaneously enhancing cognition and physical abilities. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of this intervention in enhancing cognitive and physical abilities in elderly individuals with subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and mild Alzheimer's dementia. METHODS: A 12-week observational study enrolled 57 participants aged 60-85 years. Primary outcomes included changes in cognitive scores (Korean Mini-Mental State Examination, 2nd edition [K-MMSE-2] and Korean-Montreal Cognitive Assessment [K-MoCA]), while secondary outcomes measured physical parameters and depression scores between baseline and week 12 in the active and the control groups. RESULTS: Of 57 participants, 49 completed the study. The active group (≥12 sessions) exhibited significant improvement in K-MoCA compared to the control group (<12 sessions) (p=0.004), while K-MMSE-2 score changes showed no significant difference (p=0.579). Positive correlations between training sessions and K-MoCA changes were observed (r=0.31, p=0.038), emphasizing a dose-response relationship. Subgroup analyses revealed a distinction in cognitive changes, particularly in the MCI group. CONCLUSION: The COGNIMO platform showed positive effects on cognitive function in MCI patients, suggesting potential benefits for this population. The study highlights the potential of AR-integrated home-based interventions for cognitive enhancement in elderly individuals, underlining the need for further trials in the future.

Risk factors for cognitive dysfunction amongst patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Background: The impact of cardiovascular diseases on cognition raises important research questions. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between demographic data, cardiovascular diseases, kidney disease and depressive symptoms on cognition. Methods: A cross-sectional study of patients with cardiovascular diseases was performed. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was applied for cognitive evaluation. Based on MoCA three groups were defined: preserved cognition, mild, and advanced cognitive dysfunction (CD). Data were analyzed using Cronbach alpha (Cα) and McDonald's ω (Mω) for internal consistency. The Chi-square test, Cramer's V test, and correlation analyses were also applied. Results: Of 628 patients, 55.2% had mild CD, and the mean age was 67.95 (SD 9.53) years. Cα and Mω were 0.7, indicating good internal consistency. We found a moderate positive correlation between depression and the severity of CD (r = 0.25, p = 0.0001). A weak association between CD and female gender (p = 0.016), atrial fibrillation (p = 0.03), stroke (p = 0.009), and a moderate association for age group (p < 0.0001), education level (p < 0.0001), smoking (p < 0.0001), and renal dysfunction (p < 0.0001) was found. Age ≥ 70 years, eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73m2 significantly increased the likelihood for mild and advanced CD, while smoking and > 9 classes decreased it. Female gender, history of atrial fibrillation, and stroke significantly increased the likelihood of advanced CD. Conclusion: Mild CD was the most common in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Older age, lower education, being a non-smoker, and renal dysfunction were risk factors for both mild and advanced CD. Female gender, previous diagnosis of atrial fibrillation, and stroke are risk factors for advanced CD.

Montreal Cognitive Assessment's auditory items (MoCA-22): Normative data and reliable change indices.

Our objective was to establish normative data and reliable change indices (RCI) for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment's auditory items (MoCA-22). 4,935 cognitively unimpaired participants were administered the MoCA during an in-person visit to an Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (Mage = 67.9, Meducation = 16.2, 65.8% women, 75.9% non-Hispanic-White), with 2,319 unimpaired participants returning for follow-up. Normative values and cutoffs were developed using demographic predictions from ordinary and quantile regression. Test-retest reliability was calculated using Spearman and intraclass correlations. RCI values were calculated using Chelune and colleagues' (1993) formula. Education, age, and sex were all statistically related to MoCA-22 scores, with education having the strongest relationship. Notably, these relationships were not consistent across MoCA-22 quantiles, with education becoming more important and sex becoming less important for predicting low scores. These models were integrated into a calculator for deriving normative scores for an individual case. Furthermore, there was adequate-to-good test-retest reliability (ϱ = 0.56 95% CI [.54, .59]; ICC = 0.75, 95% CI [.73, .77]) and changes of at least 2-3 points are necessary to identify reliable change at 1-3-year follow-up. These findings add to the literature regarding utility of the MoCA-22 in the cognitive screening of older adults.

An interplay between cross-cultural and psychometric factors in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Experience from the language of a small nation.

The present study aimed to test the hypothesis that the total word length on the Memory subtest of the Czech version of the MoCA, which is 12 syllables compared to the English version of 7 syllables, would have a significant effect on Delayed Recall scores compared to the newly created well-balanced version of the test (further MoCA-WLE). In the original Czech version of MoCA, we replaced the 12-syllable word list in the Memory subtest with a 7-syllable list (MoCA-WLE) to make it equivalent to the standard English version in this respect. We analyzed data from 83 participants in the original MoCA group (70.63 ± 7.01 years old, 14.61 ± 3.17 years of education, 30.12% males) and 83 participants in the MoCA-WLE group (70.72 ± 6.95 years old, 14.93 ± 3.48 years of education, 30.12% males). We did not find evidence for a significant word-length effect in the original MoCA versus MoCA-WLE Delayed Recall in either the Mann-Whitney U test (W = 3418.0, p = .932) or multilevel binomial regression (b = 0.10, 95% posterior probability interval [-0.46, 0.68]). The present study shows cross-cultural limits in the adaptation of the test material. The results underline the caveats of such an approach to test adaptation. Fortunately, 12-syllables in the MoCA Memory Czech version versus the original 7-syllable list did not show a detectable word-length effect. We did not find evidence for differential item functioning or cultural item bias. The original MoCA Czech version is psychometrically comparable to the original English version.

Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Five Cognitive Screening Tests for Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment in Patients Consulting for Memory Loss.

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic capacity of five cognitive screening tests for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in patients consulting by memory loss. Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 140 participants with a mean age of 74.42 ± 7.60 years, 87 (62.14%) women. Patients were classified as MCI or cognitively unimpaired according to a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. The diagnostic properties of the following screening tests were compared: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) and Mini-Addenbrooke (M-ACE), Memory Impairment Screen (MIS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS). Results: The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.861 for the ACE-III, 0.867 for M-ACE, 0.791 for MoCA, 0.795 for MMSE, 0.731 for RUDAS, and 0.672 for MIS. For the memory components, the AUC was 0.869 for ACE-III, 0.717 for MMSE, 0.755 for MoCA, and 0.720 for RUDAS. Cronbach's alpha was 0.827 for ACE-III, 0.505 for MMSE, 0.896 for MoCA, and 0.721 for RUDAS. Correlations with Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test were moderate with M-ACE, ACE-III, and MoCA, and moderate for the other tests. The M-ACE showed the best balance between diagnostic capacity and time of administration. Conclusions: ACE-III and its brief version M-ACE showed better diagnostic properties for the diagnosis of MCI than the other screening tests. MoCA and MMSE showed adequate properties, while the diagnostic capacity of MIS and RUDAS was limited.

On the Clinimetrics of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Cutoff Analysis in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer's Disease.

Background: In the era of disease-modifying therapies, empowering the clinical neuropsychologist's toolkit for timely identification of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is crucial. Objective: Here we examine the clinimetric properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for the early diagnosis of MCI due to Alzheimer's disease (MCI-AD). Methods: Data from 48 patients with MCI-AD and 47 healthy controls were retrospectively analyzed. Raw MoCA scores were corrected according to the conventional Nasreddine's 1-point correction and demographic adjustments derived from three normative studies. Optimal cutoffs were determined while previously established cutoffs were diagnostically reevaluated. Results: The original Nasreddine's cutoff of 26 and normative cutoffs (non-parametric outer tolerance limit on the 5th percentile of demographically-adjusted score distributions) were overly imbalanced in terms of Sensitivity (Se) and Specificity (Sp). The optimal cutoff for Nasreddine's adjustment showed adequate clinimetric properties (≤23.50, Se = 0.75, Sp = 0.70). However, the optimal cutoff for Santangelo's adjustment (≤22.85, Se = 0.65, Sp = 0.87) proved to be the most effective for both screening and diagnostic purposes according to Larner's metrics. The results of post-probability analyses revealed that an individual testing positive using Santangelo's adjustment combined with a cutoff of 22.85 would have 84% post-test probability of receiving a diagnosis of MCI-AD (LR+ = 5.06). Conclusions: We found a common (mal)practice of bypassing the applicability of normative cutoffs in diagnosis-oriented clinical practice. In this study, we identified optimal cutoffs for MoCA to be allocated in secondary care settings for supporting MCI-AD diagnosis. Methodological and psychometric issues are discussed.

Improving diagnostic accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to identify post-stroke cognitive impairment.

Given advantages in reperfusion therapy leading to mild stroke, less apparent cognitive deficits can be overseen in a routine neurological examination. Despite the widespread use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), age- and education-specific cutoffs for the detection of post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) are not established, hampering its valid application in stroke. We aimed to establish age- and education-specific MoCA cutoffs to better discriminate patients with and without acute PSCI. Patients with acute ischemic stroke underwent the MoCA and a detailed neuropsychological assessment. PSCI was defined as a performance < - 1.5 SD in ≥ 2 cognitive domains. As secondary data analysis, the discriminant abilities of the MoCAraw-score (not adding + 1 as correction for ≤ 12 years of education, YoE) cutoffs were automatically derived based on Youden Index and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analyses across age- (< 55, 55-70, > 70 years old) and education-specific (≤ 12 and > 12 YoE) groups. 351 stroke patients (67.4 ± 14.1 years old; 13.1 ± 2.8 YoE) underwent the neuropsychological assessment 2.7 ± 2.0 days post-stroke. The original MoCA cutoff < 26 falsely classified 26.2% of examined patients, with poor sensitivity in younger adults (34.8% in patients < 55 years > 12 YoE) and poor specificity in older adults (55.0%, in > 70 years ≤ 12 YoE). By maximizing both sensitivity and specificity, the optimal MoCAraw cutoffs were: (i) < 28 in patients aged < 55 with > 12 YoE (sensitivity = 69.6%, specificity = 77.8%); (ii) < 22 and < 25 in patients > 70 years with ≤ 12 and > 12 YoE (sensitivity = 61.6%, specificity = 90.0%; sensitivity = 63.3%, specificity = 84.0%, respectively). In other groups the optimal MoCAraw cutoff was < 26. Age and education level should be considered when interpreting MoCA-scores. Though new age- and education-specific cutoffs demonstrated higher discriminant ability for PSCI, their performance in young stroke and adults with higher education level was low due to ceiling effects and MoCA subtests structure, and cautious interpretation in these patients is warranted.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05653141.

Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Movement Disorders: Comparison of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen in Parkinson's Disease and Lewy Body Dementia.

Background: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is recommended by the Movement Disorder Society for cognitive testing in movement disorders including Parkinson's disease (PD) and lewy body dementia. Few studies have compared cognitive screening instruments in these diseases, which overlap clinically. Objective: To compare the MoCA and Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci) screen in this population. Methods: Patients attending memory and movement disorder clinics associated with a university hospital had the MoCA and Qmci screen performed and diagnostic accuracy compared with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Duration and severity of movement disorders was assessed using the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS). Results: In total, 133 assessments were available, median age 74±5. Median education was 11±4 years and 65% were male. Median total UPDRS score was 37±26. Median Qmci screen was 51±27, median MoCA was 19±10. There were statistically significant differences in test scores between those with subjective symptoms but normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia (p < 0.001). The Qmci screen had significantly greater accuracy differentiating normal cognition from MCI versus the MoCA (AUC 0.90 versus 0.72, p = 0.01). Both instruments had similar accuracy in identifying cognitive impairment and separating MCI from dementia. The median administration time for the Qmci screen and MoCA were 5.19 and 9.24 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Both the MoCA and Qmci screen have good to excellent accuracy in a population with movement disorders experiencing cognitive symptoms. The Qmci screen was significantly more accurate for those with early symptoms and had a shorter administration time.

The Montreal cognitive assessment: normative data from a large, population-based sample of Chinese healthy adults and validation for detecting vascular cognitive impairment.

Background: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a valuable tool for detecting cognitive impairment, widely used in many countries. However, there is still a lack of large sample normative data and whose cut-off values for detecting cognitive impairment is considerable controversy. Methods: The assessment conducted in this study utilizes the MoCA scale, specifically employing the Mandarin-8.1 version. This study recruited a total of 3,097 healthy adults aged over 20 years. We performed multiple linear regression analysis, incorporating age, gender, and education level as predictor variables, to examine their associations with the MoCA total score and subdomain scores. Subsequently, we established normative values stratified by age and education level. Finally, we included 242 patients with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) and 137 controls with normal cognition, and determined the optimal cut-off value of VCI through ROC curves. Results: The participants in this study exhibit a balanced gender distribution, with an average age of 54.46 years (SD = 14.38) and an average education period of 9.49 years (SD = 4.61). The study population demonstrates an average MoCA score of 23.25 points (SD = 4.82). The multiple linear regression analysis indicates that MoCA total score is influenced by age and education level, collectively accounting for 46.8% of the total variance. Higher age and lower education level are correlated with lower MoCA total scores. A score of 22 is the optimal cut-off value for diagnosing vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). Conclusion: This study offered normative MoCA values specific to the Chinese adults. Furthermore, this study indicated that a score of 26 may not represent the most optimal cut-off value for VCI. And for detecting VCI, a score of 22 may be a better cut-off value.

Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Is Associated with Short-Term Memory Decline and Dementia in Individuals of African Ancestry.

Background: Over the last decade, studies have suggested that primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) may be associated with cognitive impairment and dementia, as both pathologies are age-related neurodegenerative processes. It remains unclear to what extent neurodegeneration in POAG extends to other neurological functions beyond vision, such as cognition. This follow-up study examined the potential association between POAG and cognitive decline in an African ancestry population. Methods: The Telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) was administered to POAG cases and controls previously enrolled in the Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) study. Cases were assessed for retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and for the presence of dementia via chart review. Comparisons between POAG cases and controls were performed using two-sample t-tests for the T-MoCA total score and five subsection scores, and using chi-squared tests for incidence of dementia. Current scores were compared to scores from this same cohort from 7 years prior. Results: The T-MoCA was administered to 13 cases and 20 controls. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) T-MoCA total score was 15.5 ± 4.0 in cases and 16.7 ± 3.5 in controls (p = 0.36). However, there was a borderline significant difference in the delayed recall sub-score (2.3 ± 1.6 for cases vs. 3.4 ± 1.5 for controls, p = 0.052) and a significant difference in its sub-domain, the memory index score (MIS, 9.1 ± 4.3 for cases vs. 12.1 ± 3.0 for controls, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between cases and controls for the remaining subsections. During 7 years of follow-up, a higher incidence of dementia was noted in POAG cases (7.1% for cases vs. 0% for controls, p = 0.058). Over 7 years, there was no significant deterioration in the cognitive performance of cases versus controls, and no association was seen between RNFL thinning and cognitive impairment. Conclusions: In this small-sample follow-up study of African ancestry individuals, POAG cases demonstrated worse short-term memory and higher incidence of dementia compared to controls. Future larger studies are needed to further investigate the presence and impact of neurodegeneration in POAG.

A Comparison of Test-Retest Reliability and Practice Effects of Short Portable Mental State Questionnaire and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Patients with Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the test-retest reliabilities and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Short Portable Mental State Questionnaire (SPMSQ) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in patients with stroke. METHODS: 63 patients were recruited from 1 medical center. The SPMSQ and MoCA were administered twice, 2 weeks apart. RESULTS: Both measures showed high intraclass correlation coefficients (SPMSQ: 0.87; MoCA: 0.89) and acceptable MDC%s (SPMSQ: 14.8%; MoCA: 19.6%). A small correlation (r = 0.30) was found between the absolute difference and average in each pair of assessments in the SPMSQ, which was close to the criterion of heteroscedasticity. A small practice effect was observed in the MoCA (Cohen's d = 0.30). CONCLUSION: The SPMSQ demonstrated smaller random measurement error and an absence of practice effect. When comparing the psychometric properties of the SPMSQ and MoCA as outcome measures for assessing cognitive function in patients with stroke, the SPMSQ appears to be a more suitable choice than the MoCA.

Potential increased propofol sensitivity in cognitively impaired elderly: a controlled, double-blind study.

Background: Cognitive impairment in the elderly may lead to potential increased sensitivity to anesthetic agents targeting receptors associated with cognition. This study aimed to explore the effect of cognitive status on propofol consumption during surgery in elderly patients. Methods: Sixty elderly patients scheduled for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were allocated to either a cognitively normal [CogN, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥26] or cognitively impaired (CogI, MoCA <26) group. Propofol was administered via target-controlled infusion to maintain a bispectral index (BIS) between 55-65 during surgery. Propofol consumption was recorded at three time points: T1 (abolished eyelash reflex), T2 (BIS = 50), T3 (extubation). BIS values at eyelash reflex abolition were also recorded. Postoperative MoCA, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and remifentanil/sufentanil consumption were assessed. Results: BIS values before induction were similar between CogN and CogI groups. However, at eyelash reflex abolition, BIS was significantly higher in CogI than CogN (mean ± SD: 65.3 ± 7.2 vs. 61.1 ± 6.8, p = 0.031). Propofol requirement to reach BIS 50 was lower in CogI vs. CogN (1.24 ± 0.19 mg/kg vs. 1.46 ± 0.12 mg/kg, p = 0.003). Postoperative MoCA, VAS scores, and remifentanil/sufentanil consumption did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: Compared to cognitively intact elderly, those with cognitive impairment exhibited higher BIS at eyelash reflex abolition and required lower propofol doses to achieve the same BIS level, suggesting increased propofol sensitivity. Cognitive status may impact anesthetic medication requirements in the elderly.

Olfactory Function as a Potential Predictor of Cognitive Impairment in Men and Women.

BACKGROUND: Different previous studies indicated olfactory function as a predictor of several types of cognitive impairment, in particular related to neurodegenerative disease. However, scanty data are available on the role of odor threshold (OT), odor discrimination (OD), and odor identification (OI) as a predictor of cognitive impairment. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential correlations between each factor of the olfactory function versus each specific cognitive domain of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test on healthy subjects in relation to gender and age. METHODS: Sniffin' Sticks and MoCA tests were used to determine olfactory function and cognitive abilities, respectively. RESULTS: In men, significant correlations were found in OT versus language index score and OI versus language and executive index score, while in women, OD and OI were correlated to visuospatial index score. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that olfactory function (OT, OD, and OI) may be considered a predictor for cognitive impairment in relation to gender and age.

The utility of the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) in detecting cognitive impairment in surgical populations - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in detecting cognitive impairment (CI) and assess the association of MoCA scores with adverse postoperative outcomes in surgical populations. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Perioperative setting. PATIENTS: Adults undergoing elective or emergent surgery screened for CI preoperatively using the MoCA. MEASUREMENTS: The outcomes included the diagnostic accuracy of the MoCA in screening for CI and the pooled prevalence of CI in various surgical populations. CI and its association with adverse events including delirium, hospital length-of-stay (LOS), postoperative complications, discharge destination, and mortality was determined. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-six studies (5059 patients, 18 non-cardiac studies, 8 cardiac studies) were included. With a MoCA cut-off score of <26, the prevalence of preoperative CI was 48% (95% CI: 41%-54%). The MoCA had 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.93) sensitivity, 0.72 (95% CI: 0.62-0.80) specificity, PPV of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65-0.81), and NPV of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77-0.92) when validated against Petersen criteria, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association criteria to identify CI. Using the MoCA as a screening tool, the LOS was 3.75 (95% CI: -0.03-7.53, P = 0.05, not significant) days longer in the CI group after non-cardiac surgeries and 3.33 (95% CI: 1.24-5.41, P < 0.002) days longer after cardiac surgeries than the non-cognitively impaired group. CONCLUSIONS: MoCA had been validated in the surgical population. MoCA with a cut-off score of <26 was shown to have 87% sensitivity and 72% specificity in identifying CI. A positive screen in MoCA was associated with a 3-day longer hospital LOS in cardiac surgery in the CI group than in the non-CI group.

Comparative Performance of Five Cognitive Screening Tests in a Large Sample of Seniors.

INTRODUCTION: Recent introductions of disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease have re-invigorated the cause of early dementia detection. Cognitive "paper and pencil" tests represent the bedrock of clinical assessment, because they are cheap, easy to perform, and do not require brain imaging or biological testing. Cognitive tests vary greatly in duration, complexity, sociolinguistic biases, probed cognitive domains, and their specificity and sensitivity of detecting cognitive impairment (CI). Consequently, an ecologically valid head-to-head comparison seems essential for evidence-based dementia screening. METHOD: We compared five tests: Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS), Addenbrooke's cognitive examination (ACE-III), euro-coin handling test (Eurotest), and image identification test (Phototest) on a large sample of seniors (N = 456, 77.9 ± 8 years, 71% females). Their specificity and sensitivity were estimated in a novel way by contrasting each test's outcome to the majority outcome across the remaining tests (comparative specificity and sensitivity calculation [CSSC]). This obviates the need for an a priori gold standard such as a clinically clear-cut sample of dementia/MCI/controls. We posit that the CSSC results in a more ecologically valid estimation of clinical performance while precluding biases resulting from different dementia/MCI diagnostic criteria and the proficiency in detecting these conditions. RESULTS: There exists a stark trade-off between behavioral test specificity and sensitivity. The test with the highest specificity had the lowest sensitivity, and vice versa. The comparative specificities and sensitivities were, respectively: Phototest (97%, 47%), Eurotest (94%, 55%), ADAS (90%, 68%), ACE-III (72%, 77%), MoCA (55%, 95%). CONCLUSION: Assuming a CI prevalence of 10%, the shortest (∼3 min) and the simplest instrument, the Phototest, was shown to have the best overall performance (accuracy 92%, PPV 66%, NPV 94%).

Investigating cognitive impairment, biopsychosocial barriers, and predictors of return to daily life among older stroke survivors.

Purpose: The aim was to investigate the associations between cognitive impairment and biopsychosocial factors among older stroke survivors and predictors of poststroke return to daily life. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study involved 117 stroke survivors (61% men) with an average age of 77 years (range 65-91). The participants completed two questionnaires (Riksstroke and Short Form 36 questionnaires). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used to assess cognitive abilities. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework guided the selection of biopsychosocial variables. We used Spearman's correlation coefficient and multiple logistic regression in the analyses. Results: The average MoCA score was 21.7 points (range: 4-30, SD 5.6). The need for assistance from relatives and professionals, need for help with dressing and household chores, reliance on others for mobility, and reading and balance problems were correlated with more severe cognitive impairment (r = 0.20-0.33). Cognitive impairment, fatigue, and balance issues predicted an unfavorable return to daily life (odds ratio: 6.2-6.8). Conclusion: The study indicated that cognitive impairment is associated with difficulties in all ICF domains. Cognitive impairment, fatigue, and balance issues are associated with an unsuccessful return to daily life. Prioritizing these factors and screening for cognitive impairment with objective assessment tools may improve rehabilitation outcomes and enhance overall quality of life poststroke.

Association between serum magnesium levels and cognitive function in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) and cognitive function remains largely unknown. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the association between CKD-MBD and cognitive function in patients on hemodialysis. METHODS: Hemodialysis patients aged ≥ 65 years without diagnosed dementia were included. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). CKD-MBD markers, serum magnesium, intact parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD), fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23, and soluble α-klotho were measured. RESULTS: Overall, 390 patients with a median age of 74 (interquartile range, 70-80) years, mean serum magnesium level of 2.4 ± 0.3 mg/dL, and median MoCA and MMSE scores of 25 (22-26) and 28 (26-29), respectively, were analyzed. MoCA and MMSE scores were significantly higher (preserved cognitive function) in the high-magnesium group than in the low-magnesium group according to the unadjusted linear regression analysis (ß coefficient [95% confidence interval (CI)] 1.05 [0.19, 1.92], P = 0.017 for MoCA; 1.2 [0.46, 1.94], P = 0.002 for MMSE) and adjusted multivariate analysis with risk factors for dementia (ß coefficient [95% CI] 1.12 [0.22, 2.02], P = 0.015 for MoCA; 0.92 [0.19, 1.65], P = 0.014 for MMSE). CONCLUSIONS: Higher serum magnesium levels might be associated with preserved cognitive function in hemodialysis patients. Conversely, significant associations were not observed between cognitive function and intact PTH, 25-OHD, FGF-23, or soluble α-klotho levels.

Cerebrovascular reactivity MRI as a biomarker for cerebral small vessel disease-related cognitive decline: Multi-site validation in the MarkVCID Consortium.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) represent a major factor in cognitive decline in older adults. The present study examined the relationship between cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cognitive function in a multi-site study, using a predefined hypothesis. METHODS: We conducted the study in a total of three analysis sites and 263 subjects. Each site performed an identical CVR MRI procedure using 5% carbon dioxide inhalation. A global cognitive measure of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and an executive function measure of item response theory (IRT) score were used as outcomes. RESULTS: CVR and MoCA were positively associated, and this relationship was reproduced at all analysis sites. CVR was found to be positively associated with executive function. DISCUSSION: The predefined hypothesis on the association between CVR and a global cognitive score was validated in three independent analysis sites, providing support for CVR as a biomarker in VCID. HIGHLIGHTS: This study measured a novel functional index of small arteries referred to as cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). CVR was positively associated with global cognition in older adults. This finding was observed in three independent cohorts at three sites. Our statistical analysis plan was predefined before beginning data collection.

Cognitive functions and the brain-derived neurotrophic factor in patients with mild autonomous cortisol secretion.

CONTEXT: The impact of abnormal cortisol secretion on cognitive functions in patients with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To assess cognitive functions, determine serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) concentration in patients with MACS, and investigate the association between cognitive subdomains and BDNF. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 84 participants-28 patients with MACS, 28 patients with nonfunctional adrenal adenoma (NFAA), and 28 control subjects matched for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), visceral adiposity, and educational level. The serum BDNF concentration of participants was measured. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition-focused interviews and Montreal Cognitive Assessments (MoCA) were carried out by an experienced psychiatrist. RESULTS: Patients with MACS had a higher serum BDNF concentration than the NFAA (P = .001), while that of patients with NFAA was lower than the controls (P = .044). Linear regression analysis revealed BMI and morning cortisol after overnight 1 mg dexamethasone (DST) were mostly associated with BDNF (P < .05). No significant difference was found in MoCA scores between MACS and NFAA groups (P = .967), whereas those were lower than the control group (P = .004). When the cognitive subdomains were examined separately, MACS group performed higher memory score than NFAA (P = .045), but lower language scores than both the NFAA (P = .024) and control groups (P < .001). In the whole group, BDNF concentration was positively correlated with memory score (r = 0.337, P = .002), whereas DST was negatively correlated with language score (r = -0.355, P = .008). CONCLUSION: Low-grade hypercortisolism is associated with elevated BDNF concentrations, which may be a protective factor for memory function in patients with MACS relative to those with NFAA.

Integrity of autobiographical memory and episodic future thinking in older adults varies with cognitive functioning.

Research has documented changes in autobiographical memory and episodic future thinking in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, cognitive decline occurs gradually and recent findings suggest that subtle alterations in autobiographical cognition may be evident earlier in the trajectory towards dementia, before AD-related symptoms emerge or a clinical diagnosis has been given. The current study used the Autobiographical Interview to examine the episodic and semantic content of autobiographical past and future events generated by older adults (N = 38) of varying cognitive functioning who were grouped into High (N = 20) and Low Cognition (N = 18) groups based on their Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. Participants described 12 past and 12 future autobiographical events, and transcripts were scored to quantify the numbers of internal (episodic) or external (non-episodic, including semantic) details. Although the Low Cognition group exhibited a differential reduction for internal details comprising both past and future events, they did not show the expected overproduction of external details relative to the High Cognition group. Multilevel modelling demonstrated that on trials lower in episodic content, semantic content was significantly increased in both groups. Although suggestive of a compensatory mechanism, the magnitude of this inverse relationship did not differ across groups or interact with MoCA scores. This finding indicates that external detail production may be underpinned by mechanisms not affected by cognitive decline, such as narrative style and the ability to contextualize one's past and future events in relation to broader autobiographical knowledge.