The role of HR-HPV integration in the progression of premalignant lesions into different cancer types.

High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is associated with the development of different types of cancer, such as cervical, head and neck (including oral, laryngeal, and oropharyngeal), vulvar, vaginal, penile, and anal cancers. The progression of premalignant lesions to cancer depends on factors associated with the host cell and the different epithelia infected by HPV, such as basal cells of the flat epithelium and the cells of the squamocolumnar transformation zone (STZ) found in the uterine cervix and the anal canal, which is rich in heparan sulfate proteoglycans and integrin-like receptors. On the other hand, factors associated with the viral genotype, infection with multiple viruses, viral load, viral persistence, and type of integration determine the viral breakage pattern and the sites at which the virus integrates into the host cell genome (introns, exons, intergenic regions), inducing the loss of function of tumor suppressor genes and increasing oncogene expression. This review describes the role of viral integration and the molecular mechanisms induced by HR-HPV in different types of tissues. The purpose of this review is to identify the common factors associated with the role of integration events in the progression of premalignant lesions in different types of cancer.

Local Therapy and Reconstruction in Penile Cancer: A Review.

Local therapy for penile cancer provides robust survival and can preserve the penis functionally and cosmetically. Interventions must target the appropriate clinical stage. We reviewed studies regarding the primary therapy in penile cancer, from topical therapy to radical penectomy, and reconstructive techniques. Topical therapy (5-FU or Imiquimod) provides a robust oncologic response in patients with Ta or Tis disease. Multiple laser therapies are available for localized patients and those with low-grade T1 disease. There is a non-trivial risk of progression and nodal metastases in poorly selected patients. Wide local excision provides an oncologically sound option in patient with up to T1 disease; less evidence exists for Mohs microsurgery in the setting of penile cancer. Increasingly aggressive approaches include glansectomy and partial/radical penectomy, which provide 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival rates of over 80%. Meticulous reconstruction is necessary for the durable function of the remaining penis. Preservation of voiding and sexual function occurs via penile skin grafting, glans resurfacing, creation of a functional penile stump, and phalloplasty with a penile implant. Perineal urethrostomy provides an alternative in pathology demanding extensive partial or radical penectomy, and a durable option for seated voiding. Clinical suspicion and timely diagnosis are paramount in terms of management as less-invasive options for earlier-stage disease develop.

Risk factors for distant metastasis and prognosis of the penile cancer with distant metastasis.

Background: Penile cancer (PC) is a rare malignant tumor, whose distant metastasis (DM) is associated with the poorest outcomes. The risk factors associated with DM and prognosis of the PC with DM remain elusive. This study was aimed at investigating risk factors associated with DM and constructing prediction models of PC with DM. Methods: This study analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database over a period of 2000-2020, including clinical characteristics such as age, marital status, tumor size, Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging, and treatment information. Utilizing univariate and multivariate logistic regression, alongside cox regression analysis, we identified independent risk factors for DM and prognosis in the total cases and the cases with DM. Nomograms were developed for predicting DM and prognosis in PC patients. Results: Enrolling 1,488 cases, our study identified tumor size and N stage as independent predictors of DM. The predictive nomogram for DM achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.904. Notably, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates for PC with DM were 35%, 17%, and 13%, respectively, with larger tumor size associated with prognosis of PC cases with DM. This study verified a correlation between advanced age and TNM stage, as well as chemotherapy with the poor PC prognosis. The nomogram yielded 0.72, 0.69 and 0.69, in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survivals (OS), while 0.73, 0.70 and 0.69 in predicting 1-, 3-, 5-year cancer specific survivals (CSS), respectively. Conclusions: This study investigated risk factors of PC with DM. Also, nomograms for predicting DM, OS and CSS of PC patients were developed.

The surgical technique and protocol for dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer at a Southeast Asian regional hospital.

Lymph node status is a key prognostic factor in penile cancer. The European Association of Urology (EAU) recommends intermediate-risk (pT1a, Grade 2) or high-risk (pT1b or greater) penile cancer patients with clinically non-palpable inguinal lymph node (cN0) to undergo either an invasive bilateral modified inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) or dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB). DSNB has been reported to have acceptable false negative rates, and lower rates of long-term morbidity compared to ILND. We developed a protocol for DSNB at a regional hospital in Singapore that was adopted from St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust. Four patients with cN0 penile cancer underwent DSNB between November 2021 and October 2022 according to this protocol. Our surgical technique and protocol are described. The patients' oncological characteristics and their outcomes were evaluated. In this small case series, there was no complication attributable to the performance of DSNB, and there was no groin that was documented to be false negative over a median follow up of 15.5 months (range, 12 to 22 months). Using our protocol, 5 of 8 groins (62.5%) were able to avoid ILND in the cN0 setting. We recommend the adoption of DSNB for the surgical staging of inguinal lymph nodes for patients with intermediate to high-risk penile cancer and non-palpable inguinal nodes due to its significantly lower risks of long-term morbidity compared to ILND. Appropriate specialist training and a multi-disciplinary team is vital to ensure the success of the procedure.

Advances in molecular basis of response to immunotherapy for penile cancer: better screening of responders.

Penile cancer is a rare malignant tumor of the male urinary system. The treatment benefit of standard first-line chemotherapy is not ideal for patients with locally advanced or metastatic lymph nodes. Immunotherapy has brought new treatment strategies and opportunities for patients with penile cancer. At present, clinical studies on immunotherapy for penile cancer have been reported, and the results show that it is effective but not conclusive. With the development of immunotherapy and the progress of molecular research technology, we can better screen the immunotherapy response population and explore new combination treatment regimens to evaluate the best combination regimen and obtain the optimal treatment options, which is also an important research direction for the immunotherapy of penile cancer in the future.

Penile intraepithelial neoplasia incidence, clinical classification, microenvironment and implications for imiquimod treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an outline of the existing data on penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN), as well as a narrative review on imiquimod (IQ; a toll-like receptor 7 agonist) treatment and immune microenvironment markers that may predict response to treatment. METHODS: A narrative review of the literature from 2000 to the present was conducted on PubMed, and we describe the most relevant data and cross references. RESULTS: The incidence of PeIN is increasing. Local therapy with IQ may offer an easy applicable treatment with complete response rates of up to 63% but can be associated with considerable side-effects. There is no conclusive data on the optimal treatment schedule for PeIN, but evaluation of treatment results for other human papillomavirus-related pre-malignancies suggest three times a week for a duration up to 16 weeks. There are no published studies concerning the PeIN immune microenvironment. However, findings from the few studies on penile cancer and pre-cancerous vulvar and cervical lesions imply that specific immune cell subpopulations can serve as future predictors for successful immunomodulation treatments such as IQ. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, limited data are available on IQ treatment for PeIN and no published data exists on the PeIN immune microenvironment. Further translational studies are warranted to gain more understanding on the pathophysiology of PeIN and potential predictors of progression and of response to topical treatments.

Altered tumor microenvironment heterogeneity of penile cancer during progression from non-lymphatic to lymphatic metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic metastasis is the major challenge in the treatment of penile cancer. The prognosis of individuals with lymphatic metastasis is extremely poor. Therefore, early identification of disease progression and lymphatic metastasis is an urgent task for researchers in penile cancer worldwide. METHODS: In this study, using single-cell RNA sequencing, an immune landscape was established for the cancer ecosystem based on 46,861 cells from six patients with penile cancer (four with lymphatic metastasis [stage IV] and two without lymphatic metastasis [stage I]). Using bulk RNA sequencing, the discrepancy between the cancers and their respective metastatic lymph nodes was depicted based on seven patients with penile cancer. RESULTS: The interaction between epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells, and the functional cooperation among invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and angiogenesis were found to be important landscapes in the penile cancer ecosystem, playing important roles in progression of cancer and lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to investigate the altered tumor microenvironment heterogeneity of penile cancer as it evolves from non-lymphatic to lymphatic metastasis and provides insights into the mechanisms underlying malignant progression, the premetastatic niche, and lymphatic metastasis in penile cancer.

Radiotherapy Versus Partial Penectomy for T1 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) represents an alternative treatment option for patients with T1 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP), with proven feasibility and tolerability. However, it has never been directly compared with partial penectomy (PP) using cancer-specific mortality (CSM) as an end point. METHODS: In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000-2020), T1N0M0 SCCP patients treated with RT or PP were identified. This study relied on 1:4 propensity score-matching (PSM) for age at diagnosis, tumor stage, and tumor grade. Subsequently, cumulative incidence plots as well as multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models addressed CSM. Additionally, the study accounted for the confounding effect of other-cause mortality (OCM). RESULTS: Of 895 patients with T1N0M0 SCCP, 55 (6.1%) underwent RT and 840 (93.9%) underwent PP. The RT and PP patients had a similar age distribution (median age, 70 vs 70 years) and more frequently harbored grade I or II tumors (67.3% vs 75.8%) as well as T1a-stage disease (67.3% vs 74.3%). After 1:4 PSM, 55 (100%) of the 55 RT patients versus 220 (26.2%) of the 840 PP patients were included in the study. The 10-year CSM derived from the cumulative incidence plots was 25.4% for RT and 14.4% for PP. In the multivariable CRR models, RT independently predicted a higher CSM than PP (hazard ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.80; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: For the T1N0M0 SCCP patients treated in the community, RT was associated with nearly a twofold higher CSM than PP. Ideally, a validation study based on tertiary care institution data should be conducted to test whether this CSM disadvantage is operational only in the community or not.

De Novo Urological Malignancies After Renal Transplantation: An Asian 30-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: As the incidence of urological malignancies after renal transplantation (RT) is observed to be greater than in the general population, a better understanding of them is important. We present our experience with urological tumors in RT recipients at our transplant center, and analyze their incidence, management and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 2177 RT recipients on follow-up at our center between 1990 and 2022 was conducted for de novo genitourinary malignancy. Patients diagnosed with malignancy before transplantation were excluded. Clinicopathological data at diagnosis and follow-up were collected and analyzed. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v.24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS: The overall incidence of Urological malignancies was 3.9%, with 89 cancers diagnosed in 85 patients. Renal cell carcinoma was most common (n = 61, 68.5%), followed by prostate cancer (n = 10, 11.2%), urothelial carcinoma (n = 10, 11.2%), squamous cell carcinoma of the penis/scrotum (n = 7, 7.9%), and testicular cancer (n = 1, 1.1%). Mean duration between transplantation and diagnosis of malignancy was 9.9 (0.4-20.7) years. At a median follow-up of 4.6 (018.2) years, 27 deaths were seen; 7(25.9%) were due to urological malignancy. CSS rates were 86% and 78% at five and ten years, respectively, after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: We present one of the largest series of de novo urological malignancies observed over an extended 30-year follow-up of RT recipients, demonstrating an elevated risk in line with other studies. Regular surveillance for malignancies is advised, in order to ensure early diagnosis and management.

Comparing the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery and open inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with open inguinal lymph node dissection (O-ILND) in penile cancer. METHODS: We performed a systematic reviews and cumulative meta-analyses of primary results of interest according to PRISMA criteria, and quality assessment followed AMSTAR. The system searched five databases, including Zhiwang, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The search period ranged was from database creation until September 2023. The statistical analysis software used Stata16. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies, including 898 patients. Compared to O-ILND, MIS is superior in length of stay (WMD = -2.96, 95%CI [-4.38, -1.54], P < 0.05), drainage time (WMD = -3.24, 95%CI [-4.70, -1.78], P < 0.05) and estimated blood loss (WMD = -35.70, 95%CI [-46.27, -25.14], P < 0.05), while operation time, recurrence rate and 5-year overall survival rate are the same. The number of lymph nodes dissection between the two groups are not statistically significant. Subgroup analyses found that there are more lymph nodes dissection in robotic-assisted inguinal lymph nodes dissection (WMD = 0.50, 95%CI [0.20, 0.80], P < 0.05). The overall complication rate of MIS was lower (OR = 0.26, 95%CI [0.09, 0.70], P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive inguinal lymph nodes dissection appears to be a better option for penile cancer cases. But more large samples and multicenter studies are needed to further confirm.

Psychosocial Impact of Penile Cancer: An Unmet Need.

Penile cancer is a rare cancer, where patients not only need to deal with the anxiety around a cancer diagnosis, but also manage the consequences of treatment on their self-esteem, body image, and intimate relationships. Many find it embarrassing and difficult to talk to family and friends. Due to this, changes in urination and other physical effects of treatment, many will withdraw from social activities too. Patients need psychosocial support and more needs to be done to address this unmet need. Holistic and multidisciplinary approaches in clinic, with access to counseling, may help patients adjust to their new situation.

Management of Bulky Inguinal and Pelvic Lymph Nodes.

Penile cancer with bulky inguinal metastasis has a high probability of harboring pathologically involved lymph nodes best managed in a multidisciplinary care setting. Appropriate staging with cross-sectional imaging and fine-needle aspirate cytology of suspicious nodes guide decision-making for the use of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by inguinal lymph node dissection. Surgical resection plays an important diagnostic, therapeutic, and guiding role in disease management. Patients with adverse pathologic features, especially those with extranodal disease extension, may derive additional benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.

Pathology of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis: Back to Square One.

The landscape of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCC-P) has undergone a significant transformation since the new World Health Organization classification of genitourinary cancers and recent European Association of Urology/American Association of Clinical Oncology guidelines. These changes emphasize the necessity to categorize SCC-P into 2 groups based on its association with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. This shift has major implications, considering that prior knowledge was derived from a mix of both groups. Given the distinct prognosis, treatment options, and staging systems observed for HPV-associated tumors in other body areas, the question now arises: will similar patterns emerge for SCC-P?

Overview of Systemic Therapies in Penile Cancer.

Penile cancer (PC), although rare, poses significant challenges in both diagnosis and treatment. Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) represents the most common histologic subtype of PC, accounting for approximately 95% of cases. With limited therapeutic options available, systemic therapies have emerged as critical components in the management of advanced PSCC. Recent developments in clinical research have revealed the effectiveness of new therapeutic strategies. By elucidating the mechanism of action and clinical evidence supporting these treatments, we strive to offer insights into optimizing treatment strategies and enhancing the quality of care for patients affected by this complex disease.

Immune-based Therapies for Penile Cancer.

This article reviews penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC), a rare genitourinary cancer that has been increasing in prevalence. It discusses emerging therapies, focusing on immunotherapy, vaccine therapy, and cell-based treatments, especially in the context of human papillomavirus-related PSCC. Factors influencing these therapies are discussed. These include the immune microenvironment, programmed cell death ligand-1 expression, and tumor immune cell infiltration. This article also highlights immune checkpoint inhibitors and related clinical trials. This review supports the use of personalized medicine in treating PSCC. It stresses the need for collaborative studies and data sharing to create specific treatment plans and achieve better outcomes.

A comprehensive review of current knowledge on penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Neoplasm of the penis is relatively rare in most regions representing 0-2% of cancers worldwide. While the penis can be affected by sarcomas, basal cell carcinomas or even melanoma, Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma (PSCC) represents approximately 95% of all penile neoplasms. Despite its rarity and most common presentation at later decades of life most individuals diagnosed with PSCC are faced with significant decrease in quality of life. The prevalence and incidence vary among different regions and populations, but a common trend is for diagnosis to occur late (stage 4). Underdeveloped countries are traditionally reported to have higher incidence rates; however, rates may vary significantly between urban and rural areas even in developed countries. Age adjusted rates are on the rise in some countries that used to have incidence rates of 1:100 000 or less. The list of associated risk factors is long and includes among others, lack of neonatal circumcision, poor genital hygiene, socioeconomic status, history of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN). Many risk factors are widely debated among experts however HPV and PeIN are indisputable risk factors, and both also form part of the classification system for PSCC. Both conditions may have occurred in the past or be present at the time of diagnosis and identifying them plays a major role in management strategies. For such a rare condition PSCC can present in many different forms clinically making diagnosis no easy feat. Diagnosis of PSCC is done through clinical examination, including lymph node palpation, followed by a biopsy, which is essential for the classification. Lymph node involvement is a common finding at first presentation and investigation of spread to deep nodes is important and can be done with the aid of PET-CT. Treatment options for PSCC include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Surgical removal of the tumor is considered the most effective however can lead to severe decrease of quality of life. Chemotherapy is used in the case of fixed or bulky lymph nodes, where surgery is not indicated, and for distant metastasis. Radiation therapy is particularly effective in the case of HPV-positive PSCC.

Laparoscopic simultaneous anterograde inguinal and pelvic lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: two planses, three holes, and six steps.

Objective: To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficiency of simultaneous anterograde video laparoscopic inguinal and pelvic lymphadenectomy for penile cancer. Materials and methods: We reviewed retrospectively the records of 22 patients (44 lateral) who underwent inguinal lymph nodes dissection for penile cancer. The procedure was standardized as two planes, three holes, and six steps. Two Separate-planes: superior plane of eternal oblique aponeurosis/ / fascia lata; inferior plane of superficial camper fascia. Three holes: two artificial lateral boundary holes, the internal and external boundary holes, and the hole of oval fossa. Six steps: separate the first separate-plane; separate the second layer; separate two artificial lateral boundary holes; free great saphenous vein; separate the third hole and clean up the deep inguinal lymph nodes; pelvic lymphadenectomy. Results: A total of 22 cases were included and 9 patients underwent simultaneous pelvic lymphadenectomy. The average operation time on both sides was 7.52 ± 3.29 h, which was 0.5-1 h/side after skilled. The average amount of bleeding was 93.18 ± 50.84 ml. A total of 8 patients had postoperative complications, accounting for 36.36%, and no complications great than Clavien-Dindo class III occurred. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the video laparoscopic simultaneous anterograde inguinal and pelvic lymphadenectomy is a feasible and safe technique. Indocyanine Green was helpful for lymph node identify.

Therapeutic Targets in Advanced Penile Cancer: From Bench to Bedside.

Discovery of effective systemic therapies for patients with advanced penile cancer has been slow to occur. Comprehensive genomic profiling from several studies shed light on the molecular oncogenesis of penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) and differences between HPV-related and unrelated tumors. While these two subsets of PSCC appear distinct in their biology, there are not yet specific treatment strategies recommended on that basis. Cell surface proteins have been identified that may potentially serve as drug targets for monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors. Here, we review some of the new biological insights regarding PSCC that could lead to improved therapies, as well as the related clinical trials recently completed or in progress. We conclude that antibody-drug conjugates are especially promising, as are the combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with other types of drugs.