Prediction of Response to FDA-Approved Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).

OPINION STATEMENT: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represents the predominant cancer in pediatric populations, though its occurrence in adults is relatively rare. Pre-treatment risk stratification is crucial for predicting prognosis. Important factors for assessment include patient age, white blood cell (WBC) count at diagnosis, extramedullary involvement, immunophenotype, and cytogenetic aberrations. Minimal residual disease (MRD), primarily assessed by flow cytometry following remission, plays a substantial role in guiding management plans. Over the past decade, significant advancements in ALL outcomes have been witnessed. Conventional chemotherapy has remarkably reduced mortality rates; however, its intensive nature raises safety concerns and has led to the emergence of treatment-resistant cases with recurrence of relapses. Consequently, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved several novel treatments for relapsed/refractory ALL due to their demonstrated efficacy, as indicated by improved complete remission and survival rates. These treatments include tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody blinatumomab, anti-CD22 inotuzumab ozogamicin, anti-CD20 rituximab, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Identifying the variables that influence treatment decisions is a pressing necessity for tailoring therapy based on heterogeneous patient characteristics. Key predictive factors identified in various observational studies and clinical trials include prelymphodepletion disease burden, complex genetic abnormalities, and MRD. Furthermore, the development of serious adverse events following treatment could be anticipated through predictive models, allowing for appropriate prophylactic measures to be considered. The ultimate aim is to incorporate the concept of precision medicine in the field of ALL through valid prediction platform to facilitate the selection of the most suitable treatment approach.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Development, current status, and future directions.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Several clinical trials are investigating InO in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy or other anti-ALL-targeted therapies in the salvage and frontline settings, notably in older adults who often cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy and tend to have higher-risk disease. InO is also increasingly used to bridge patients to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), in sequence with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, to eliminate measurable residual disease and to prevent post-HSCT relapse. Veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is a potential complication of InO treatment, particularly when followed by HSCT. Herein, the authors review the historical development and current status of InO, strategies for mitigating the risk of InO-related veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, and future directions for InO research and clinical use.

Advances in the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the role of frontline immunotherapy-based regimens.

Blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) are both active in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and improve outcomes compared with conventional chemotherapy in this setting. Several prospective clinical trials have explored the use of these agents in adults with newly diagnosed B-cell ALL, with promising outcomes observed in younger and older adults and in both Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and Ph-negative ALL. These novel regimens result in high rates of deep measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity and may improve survival compared with chemotherapy-only approaches, allowing for less reliance on intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This review discusses novel approaches to integrating INO and/or blinatumomab into frontline ALL regimens, including the potential role of chemotherapy-free regimens in some subgroups. The role of MRD monitoring is also discussed, including how this can inform decisions for consolidative allogeneic HSCT or investigational approaches with CD19 CAR T-cells.

Successful treatment of two cases with Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia who relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and the treatments with novel immunotherapies and ponatinib.

The outcomes of relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) resistant to new drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) and blinatumomab are dismal. We treated two cases of Ph+ALL resistant to these drugs that achieved long-term survival after treatment with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy or a second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) with a sequential conditioning regimen. Case 1: A 15-year-old boy was diagnosed with Ph+ALL. Despite the second HCT after the treatment of ponatinib and blinatumomab, hematological relapse occurred. InO was ineffective and he was transferred to a CAR-T center. After the CAR-T cell therapy, negative measurable residual disease (MRD) was achieved and maintained for 38 months without maintenance therapy. Case 2: A 21-year-old man was diagnosed with Ph+ALL. Hematological relapse occurred after the first HCT. Despite of the treatment with InO, ponatinib, and blinatumomab, hematological remission was not achieved. The second HCT was performed using a sequential conditioning regimen with clofarabine. Negative MRD was subsequently achieved and maintained for 42 months without maintenance therapy. These strategies are suggestive and helpful to treat Ph+ALL resistant to multiple immunotherapies.

MRD in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive ALL: Methodologies and Clinical Implications.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Measurable residual disease (MRD) is integral in the management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This review discusses the current methods used to evaluate MRD as well as the interpretation, significance, and incorporation of MRD in current practice. RECENT FINDINGS: New molecular technologies have allowed the detection of MRD to levels as low as 10- 6. The most used techniques to evaluate MRD are multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC), quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS). Each method varies in terms of advantages, disadvantages, and MRD sensitivity. MRD negativity after induction treatment and after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an important prognostic marker that has consistently been shown to be associated with improved outcomes. Blinatumomab, a new targeted therapy for Ph + ALL, demonstrates high efficacy in eradicating MRD and improving patient outcomes. In the relapsed/refractory setting, the use of inotuzumab ozogamicin and tisagenlecleucel has shown promise in eradicating MRD. The presence of MRD has become an important predictive measure in Ph + ALL. Current studies evaluate the use of MRD in treatment decisions, especially in expanding therapeutic options for Ph + ALL, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, targeted antibody therapies, chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy, and HCT.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Novel Agents and the Diminishing Role of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Outcomes of patients with B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) have improved remarkably in the past decade. This has largely been due to the development and introduction of novel immunotherapies such as blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, highly potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and improved risk stratification, including better understanding of high risk genomic subgroups and better methods of measurable residual disease (MRD) detection. Historically, allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) has been the consolidative treatment of choice in first complete remission for fit adults with B-ALL. However, allo-SCT is associated with significant treatment-related mortality and morbidity. Current research is directed at the incorporation of novel immunotherapies into frontline regimens to improve depth and durability of responses and ultimately increase cure rates. In this review, we will discuss the emerging role of novel immune-based treated strategies in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. We present our approach to newly diagnosed patients with B-ALL and illustrate how the incorporation of novel agents and use of high-sensitivity MRD assays can abrogate the need for allo-SCT in most patients with B-ALL.

[Sequential therapy with inotuzumab ozogamicin followed by CAR T-cell therapy for Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

A 25-year-old woman with a history of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia over ten years ago was referred to our hospital with a chief complaint of leukoblastosis. She was participating in a JPLSG (Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group) clinical study at that time. We diagnosed ALL relapse by multi-color flow cytometric analysis of bone marrow samples at admission, with reference to previous JPLSG data. Because her leukemic cells were resistant to conventional cytotoxic agents, she proceeded to lymphocyte apheresis for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T, Tisagenlecleucel [Tisa-cel]). She received two cycles of inotuzumab ozogamicin as a bridging therapy to Tisa-cel, resulting in a hematological complete remission (minimal residual disease measured by polymerase chain reaction [PCR-MRD] was positive at 1.0×10-4). She was finally administered Tisa-cel and achieved MRD negativity. She is currently in complete remission with careful MRD monitoring. This strategy of sequential bi-targeted therapy combining antibody conjugates and CAR-T cells provides tumor control in deeper remission and minimal damage to organ function through reduced use of cytotoxic anti-tumor agents. Therefore, we believe that this therapeutic strategy is an effective and rational treatment for adolescent and young adult ALL patients.

Immune therapies of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and adults.

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-cell ALL) is a common haematologic cancer in children and adults. About 10 percent of children and 50 percent of adults fail to achieve a histological complete remission or subsequently relapse despite current anti-leukaemia drug therapies and/or haematopoietic cell transplants. Several new immune therapies including monoclonal antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cells are proved safe and effective in this setting. We review data on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved immune therapies for B-cell ALL in children and adults including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, tisagenlecleucel, and brexucabtagene autoleucel. We also summarize pharmaco-dynamics, pharmaco-kinetics, and pharmaco-economics of these interventions.

Liver failure after treatment with inotuzumab and polychemotherapy including PEG-asparaginase in a patient with relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

We present the case of a 58-year-old female patient who presented with an extramedullary B-ALL relapse after prior allogenic HSCT and blinatumomab therapy. The patient died from complications of a drug-induced acute liver failure after a salvage therapy combining inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO)-based induction followed by consolidation with high dose MTX and pegaspargase based on the GMALL protocol for older ALL patients. After a diagnosis of the extramedullary relapse in the form of a retro vesical chloroma, the patient received an individualized multi-agent chemotherapy based on induction chemotherapy for older patients in combination with InO. After four administrations of InO, in combination with vincristine, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide, CT-imaging showed a reduction in volume of the chloroma and response to therapy. Consolidation with high-dose methotrexate and pegaspargase was administered. The patient developed toxic liver damage manifested by hyperbilirubinemia and progressive hepatic encephalopathy. The diagnostic criteria for VOD were met, and therapy with defibrotide was initiated. Liver biopsy revealed no histological signs of VOD but instead steatohepatitis indicative of drug-induced toxicity. The patient ultimately died of hemorrhagic shock through postinterventional hemorrhage after liver biopsy. In conclusion, although InO shows promising results in the therapy of r/r ALL with and without additional chemotherapy, the combination with MTX and pegaspargase in an intensively pretreated patient with relapse after HCST may impart an increased risk for liver-related toxicity. Special caution is required when assessing fitness for further liver toxic regimens. A key takeaway is also the reminder that InO can cause liver damage not only in the form of VOD but also through direct hepatocellular toxicity.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Approach to Older Adults With Phildadelphia-Chromosome Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Philadelphia-chromosome-negative (Ph-neg) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has historically been associated with poor outcomes in older patients due to adverse disease biology, as well as inferior tolerance of conventional chemotherapy. Fortunately, novel therapies, including inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab, and venetoclax, are now being incorporated into first-line therapy to improve efficacy and decrease toxicity of initial therapy. Inotuzumab ozogamicin, alone or in combination with low intensity chemotherapy, appears to be best suited for the induction phase of treatment due to efficacy in the setting of high tumor burden. In contrast, blinatumomab may be best suited for consolidation due to superior efficacy in setting of morphologic remission, with or without measurable residual disease (MRD). Venetoclax is being investigated in combination with chemotherapy and can be used for treatment of older adults with both B-cell and T-cell ALL. Ongoing trials incorporating inotuzumab, blinatumomab, and venetoclax demonstrate high rates of MRD-negative complete remissions with low early mortality. Long-term outcomes have been less favorable so far, with several trials reporting nonrelapse mortality during subsequent treatment. Unanswered questions remain regarding the optimal treatment of older adults with Ph-neg ALL, including central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis, the most appropriate consolidation to minimize toxicity without compromising efficacy, and the role of transplant and cellular therapy. T-cell ALL remains an area of unmet need and effort is required to ensure that therapeutic advances benefit all populations equitably. In this manuscript, we review current data and ongoing trials regarding the treatment of older adults with Ph-neg ALL and define topics for further research.

Preemptive inotuzumab ozogamicin eradicated measurable residual disease in Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia relapsed post CD19 CART therapy.

There are no reports of application of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) for the treatment of MRD in r/r B-ALL. We firstly report the efficacy of InO for a patient experienced morphological relapse after HSCT and molecular relapse after CART therapy.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel with Alternative Standard Therapies for Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adult Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel), a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, is approved for relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults aged 18+/26+ years in the US/European Union (EU), based on efficacy results from the single-arm ZUMA-3 trial. This study aimed to estimate the relative treatment effects of brexu-cel versus inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), blinatumomab (blina), and chemotherapies using unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) methods. METHODS: Individual patient data from ZUMA-3 and published aggregate level data from two randomized controlled trials, INO-VATE (InO versus chemotherapy) and TOWER (blina versus chemotherapy), were used. Patient-level data from ZUMA-3 were weighted to match the mean of the following prognostic variables at baseline, which were pre-specified based on clinical input, for each comparator population: primary refractory disease, duration of first remission < 12 months, prior stem-cell transplantation, age, performance status, salvage status, bone marrow blast, complex karyotype, and Philadelphia chromosome status. The base case analysis was conducted using the modified intention-to-treat population (i.e., received brexu-cel) from ZUMA-3. Relative treatment effects for overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) and differences in restricted mean survival time (RMST) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The base case MAIC results suggested brexu-cel improved OS and EFS compared to blina (OS HR 0.46 [95% CI 0.28, 0.75]; EFS HR 0.37 [95% CI 0.25, 0.56]) and pooled INO-VATE/TOWER chemotherapy (OS HR 0.32 [95% CI 0.18, 0.56]; EFS HR 0.27 [0.18, 0.40]). Brexu-cel also improved OS compared to InO (HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.24, 0.85]). The point estimate for EFS favored brexu-cel over Ino but the difference was not statistically significant (HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.41, 1.10]). Findings were consistent between the HR and RMST analyses. CONCLUSION: Despite limitations, these MAIC results suggest that brexu-cel may improve OS and EFS versus currently used therapies in this population.

[Relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia responding to retreatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin].

A 72-year-old man with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) was treated with dasatinib (week1: 50 mg/day, week2: 70 mg/day, week3-: 100 mg/day) and prednisolone from June 2017. However, in January 2018, it relapsed with the T315I mutation. Although the treatment was changed to ponatinib 30 mg/day, he experienced a second relapse in June 2018. Following confirmation of CD22 positivity, he was treated with three cycles of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), resulting in CR. He was CR for 2.9 years before relapsing for the third time in May 2021. Because the patient was still CD22-positive, InO was given again, and the patient achieved CR at the end of the second cycle. We had a case where re-administering InO was effective as a salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory Ph+ALL (r/r Ph+ALL) in an elderly patient.

Blinatumomab and Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Sequential Use for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Real-Life Campus All Study.

BACKGROUND: Blinatumomab (Blina) and inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) has improved the outcome of relapsed/refractory B-lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, little is known about the outcome after recurrence and re-treatment with immunotherapy. METHODS: We describe 71 R/R B-ALL patients treated for different relapses with Blina and InO. Blina was the first treatment in 57 patients and InO in 14. Twenty-seven patients had a previous allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). RESULTS: In the Blina/InO group, after Blina, 36 patients (63%) achieved a complete remission (CR), with 42% of negative minimal residual disease (MRD-); after InO, a CR was achieved in 47 patients (82%, 34 MRD-). In the InO/Blina group, after InO, 13 cases (93%) reached a CR (6 MRD-); after Blina, a CR was re-achieved in 6 cases (43%, 3 MRD-). Twenty-six patients proceeded to allo-HSCT. In the Blina/InO group, the median overall survival (OS) was 19 months; the disease-free survival (DFS) after Blina was 7.4 months (11.6 vs. 2.7 months in MRD- vs. MRD+, p = 0.03) and after InO, 5.4 months. In the InO/Blina group, the median OS was 9.4 months; the median DFS after InO was 5.1 months and 1.5 months after Blina (8.7 vs. 2.5 months in MRD- vs. MRD+, p = 0.02). With a median follow-up of 16.5 months from the start of immunotherapy, 24 patients (34%) are alive and 16 (22%) are alive in CR. CONCLUSION: In our series of R/R B-ALL, Blina and InO treatment demonstrate efficacy for subsequent relapses in terms of MRD response, OS and DFS, and as a bridge to allo-HSCT.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: efficacy, toxicity, and practical considerations.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody drug conjugate composed of a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the cell surface receptor CD22 coupled to a cytotoxic calicheamicin payload via an acid labile linker. InO has shown significant activity in relapsed and refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) in both single agent and combination chemotherapy regimens in adult and pediatric trials. Its use in newly diagnosed elderly patients has also been established while clinical trials investigating its use in newly diagnosed pediatric patients and fit adults are ongoing. Notable toxicities include sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), particularly in patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after InO as well as myelosuppression and B-cell aplasia which confer increased infection risk, particularly in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. In the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting, the planned subsequent curative therapy modality must be considered when using InO to mitigate SOS risk if proceeding to HSCT and account for potential B-cell aplasia if proceeding to chimeric antigen receptor CAR-T therapy. Studies exploring mechanisms of resistance or failure of InO are ongoing but modulation or loss CD22 expression, alternative CD22 splicing, and high Bcl-2 expression have been implicated. In this review, we will summarize the currently available data on InO, with an emphasis on pediatric trials, and explore future directions including combinatorial therapy.

Evaluation of the inpatient use of inotuzumab ozogamicin and creation of appropriate use guidelines.

Inpatient use of inotuzumab ozogamicin (IO) at our academic medical center has increased since its FDA approval in 2017. Administration of IO does not require hospitalization and is appropriate for outpatient use. The aim of this report is to assess the appropriateness of use, overall inpatient utilization, and cost of IO. This is a retrospective chart review of patients that received at least one dose of IO while admitted to the hospital. Data points included rationale for inpatient IO administration, hospital admission reason, number of IO doses and number of vials used, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, percentage of admissions that were new-starts, outpatient continuation of IO, use of concomitant regimens, and CD22 positivity. Between September 1, 2017, and June 30, 2022, 55 doses of IO were identified. Of the 29 unique admissions, common rationales for inpatient IO use included high disease burden/tumor lysis syndrome risk (31%) and use of a regimen requiring hospitalization (28%). The rationale for hospitalization was most commonly 'chemotherapy administration' (34%) and 'relapsed/refractory disease' (38%). Median length of stay was 23 days, most were new starts (76%), and 5 patients died during the associated admission. Only 63% of patients continued therapy in the outpatient setting. The inpatient use of IO was associated with a prolonged length-of-stay, a 17% in-hospital mortality, and represents a significant cost burden to the health system. As a result of these findings, guidelines for inpatient use of IO were implemented across the health system.

Switching from salvage chemotherapy to immunotherapy in adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

About one-half of adults with acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) who do not achieve molecular complete remission or who subsequently relapse are not cured by current chemo- or targeted therapies. Previously, the sole therapeutic option for such persons was a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Recently, several immune therapies including monoclonal antibodies, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CARs) have been shown safe and effective in this setting. In this manuscript, we summarize data on US FDA-approved immune therapies of advanced adult B-ALL including rituximab, blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, tisagenlecleucel and brexucabtagene autoleucel. We consider the results of clinical trials focusing on efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL). Real-world evidence is presented as well. We also briefly discuss pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacoeconomics followed by risk-benefit analyses. Lastly, we present future directions of immune therapies for advanced B-ALL in adults.

The Choice of Either Conventional Chemotherapy or Inotuzumab Ozogamicin as Bridging Regimen Does Not Appear To Impact Clinical Response to CD19-Directed CAR-T Therapy in Pediatric B-ALL.

Bridging therapy (BT) given during the period between T-cell collection and initiation of lymphodepleting chemotherapy is indicated for most children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) undergoing treatment with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. Both conventional chemotherapy agents and B-cell directed antibody-based therapies such as antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific T-cell engagers have been used as systemic forms of BT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate if there are detectable differences in clinical outcomes based on the type of BT given (conventional chemotherapy or inotuzumab). A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients treated with tisa-cel at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center for B-ALL with bone marrow disease (with or without extramedullary disease). Patients who did not receive systemic BT were excluded. Only 1 patient received blinatumomab as BT and was therefore not included in this analysis to focus the analysis on the use of inotuzumab. Pre-infusion characteristics and post-infusion outcomes were collected. Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables, and t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous parametric and non-parametric variables respectively. Mantel-Cox was used for survival analyses. Thirty-two patients received BT before CD19 CAR-T for medullary leukemia; 24 received conventional chemotherapy, and 8 received inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO). Cohorts were evenly matched regarding CAR-T indication, recipient age, and median CAR-T cell dose. There were no significant differences between the groups for attaining a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response after CAR-T, the percentage of patients who maintained prolonged B-cell aplasia, or the median duration of B-cell aplasia. Thirty-seven percent of patients in the conventional chemotherapy group and 43% in the antibody-based therapy group relapsed, with a median time to relapse in both groups of 5 months. No differences in event-free survival, the cumulative incidence of relapse, or overall survival were seen between the two groups. Initial response to tisa-cel, relapse rate, and survival were similar between patients who received BT with conventional chemotherapy or InO therapy. Because low disease burden at the time of infusion is a positive prognostic factor, choice of bridging regimen should focus on therapy that is anticipated to effectively lower disease burden and minimize treatment-related toxicity. Given the limitations associated with the single center retrospective analysis, a larger, multicenter study is needed to further explore these findings.

Post-Transplantation Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome in Adult Patients with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Pretransplantation Inotuzumab.

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a potentially life-threatening complication that can be observed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Inotuzumab ozogamicin is an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate that has demonstrated high efficacy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) but is associated with an increased risk of SOS in HCT recipients. Here we aimed to examine the incidence and outcomes of SOS in 47 adult patients with R/R ALL who received inotuzumab therapy and subsequently underwent HCT at our institution. All patients received prophylactic therapy with ursodiol, and continuous low-dose heparin also was administered to patients receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC). SOS occurred in 12 patients (26%) post-HCT, at a median onset of 11 days (range, 3 to 41 days). SOS was graded as very severe in 50% (n = 6), severe in 25% (n = 3), and mild in 25% (n = 3). All patients diagnosed with SOS received treatment with defibrotide for a median of 21 days (range, 3 to 34 days), with resolution of SOS occurring in 8 patients (67%). Mortality from SOS was 33% (n = 4) and occurred at a median of 10 days from diagnosis (range, 3 to 31 days) in patients graded as very severe (n = 3) or severe (n = 1). There were no significant differences between patients who developed SOS and those who did not develop SOS in the median time from the last dose of inotuzumab to transplantation (46 days versus 53 days; P = .37), use of an MAC regimen (42% versus 49%; P = .75), number of lines of therapy prior to inotuzumab (P = .79), median number of administered cycles of inotuzumab (2 versus 2; P = .14), or receipt of inotuzumab as the last therapy prior to HCT (67% versus 66%; P = 1.0). Sirolimus-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was used more frequently in the SOS group (75% versus 29%; P < .01), but there was no between-group difference in the peak sirolimus level (P = .81) or the median time to peak sirolimus level (7 days versus 3.5 days; P = .39). In univariable analysis, only the use of sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis was significantly associated with an increased risk of SOS (hazard ratio [HR], 7.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 33.6; P < .01). In the SOS group, the 100-day mortality rate was 33% (n = 4), and median overall survival (OS) post-HCT was 4.3 months (range, 0.2 to 57.2 months). In the group without SOS, the 100-day mortality rate was 14% (n = 5) and the median OS post-HCT was 10.7 months (range, .52 to 39.6 months). In this study cohort, SOS was prevalent in HCT recipients who had been treated with inotuzumab prior to transplantation, and sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis was a risk factor for SOS in inotuzumab recipients.