Screening Tool for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Based on a Deep-Learning Algorithm Using Printed 12-Lead Electrocardiographic Records during Sinus Rhythm.

Background: Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly improved atrial fibrillation (AF) detection using electrocardiography (ECG) data obtained during sinus rhythm (SR). However, the utility of printed ECG (pECG) records for AF detection, particularly in developing countries, remains unexplored. This study aims to assess the efficacy of an AI-based screening tool for paroxysmal AF (PAF) using pECGs during SR. Methods: We analyzed 5688 printed 12-lead SR-ECG records from 2192 patients admitted to Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between May 2011 to August 2022. All patients underwent catheter ablation for PAF (AF group) or other electrophysiological procedures (non-AF group). We developed a deep learning model to detect PAF from these printed SR-ECGs. The 2192 patients were randomly assigned to training (1972, 57.3% with PAF), validation (108, 57.4% with PAF), and test datasets (112, 57.1% with PAF). We developed an applet to digitize the printed ECG data and display the results within a few seconds. Our evaluation focused on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1 score, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and precision-recall curves (PRAUC). Results: The PAF detection algorithm demonstrated strong performance: sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 66.7%, accuracy 78.6%, F1 score 0.824, AUROC 0.871 and PRAUC 0.914. A gradient-weighted class activation map (Grad-CAM) revealed the model's tailored focus on different ECG areas for personalized PAF detection. Conclusions: The deep-learning analysis of printed SR-ECG records shows high accuracy in PAF detection, suggesting its potential as a reliable screening tool in real-world clinical practice.

Takotsubo syndrome complicated by cardiogenic shock due to left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, acute mitral regurgitation, and atrial fibrillation: a case report.

Background: Although Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is generally considered a benign disease, recent reports showed the incidence of cardiogenic shock due to left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), mitral regurgitation (MR), and primary pump failure was estimated to be 6-20%. Case summary: A 78-year-old woman presented with chest pain and cold sweats 2 days after surgery for lung cancer. Acute coronary syndrome was suspected based on her symptoms, electrocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and laboratory data; thus, emergency catheterization was performed. Normal coronaries were observed, with hyperkinesis at the base of the left ventricle and akinesis at its apex, leading to the diagnosis of the apical ballooning type of TTS. Pressure differences between the apex of the left ventricle (168/8/28 mmHg) and aorta (94/50/64 mmHg) indicated the presence of LVOTO. Two days after TTS onset, she developed cardiogenic shock (blood pressure was 54/38 mmHg). Transthoracic echocardiography showed acute MR due to systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve caused by LVOTO, which was further exacerbated by paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Fluid resuscitation, intravenous ß-blockers, and amiodarone were administered for reduction of the pressure gradient in the left ventricular outflow, rate control, and sinus rhythm maintenance. Her condition improved along with the MR, thereby improving LVOTO and maintaining sinus rhythm. Discussion: Takotsubo syndrome should be kept in mind as a potential cause of acute MR due to LVOTO. Catheterization and multiple follow-up TTE play a major role in early detection for this condition.

Low-Voltage Area Ablation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Low-voltage area (LVA) ablation, in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), has been proposed as a new strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but clinical trials have shown conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of LVA ablation in patient undergoing AF ablation (PROSPERO-registered CRD42024537696). Methods: Randomized clinical trials investigating the role of LVA ablation in addition to PVI in patients with AF were searched on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 22 April 2024. Primary outcome was atrial arrhythmia recurrence after the first AF ablation procedure. Secondary endpoints included procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and procedure-related complication rate. Sensitivity analysis including only patients with LVA demonstration at mapping and multiple subgroups analyses were also performed. Results: 1547 patients from 7 studies were included. LVA ablation in addition to PVI reduced atrial arrhythmia recurrence (odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.81, p < 0.001) with a number needed to treat to prevent recurrence of 10. No difference in procedure time (mean difference [MD] -5.32 min, 95% CI -19.01-8.46 min, p = 0.45), fluoroscopy time (MD -1.10 min, 95% CI -2.48-0.28 min, p = 0.12) and complication rate (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.40-1.61, p = 0.54) was observed. Consistent results were demonstrated when considering only patients with LVA during mapping and in prespecified subgroups for AF type (paroxysmal vs. persistent), multicentric vs. monocentric trial, and ablation strategy in control group. Conclusions: In patients with AF, ablation of LVAs in addition to PVI reduces atrial arrhythmia recurrence without a significant increase in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, or complication rate.

Lesion characteristics using high-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation versus standard ventilation during ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: High-frequency low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been shown to be superior to standard ventilation (SV) in terms of procedural efficiency, acute and long-term clinical outcomes. Our study aimed to compare ablation lesions characteristics utilizing HFLTV ventilation versus SV during RFCA of PAF. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for PAF between August 2022 and March 2023, using high-power short-duration ablation. Thirty-five patients underwent RFCA with HFLTV ventilation and were matched with another cohort of 35 patients who underwent RFCA with SV. Parameters including ablation duration, contact force (CF), impedance drop, and ablation index were extracted from the CARTONET database for each ablation lesion. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included (HFLTV = 35/2484 lesions, SV = 35/2830 lesions) in the analysis. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. While targeting the same ablation index, the HFLTV ventilation group demonstrated shorter average ablation duration per lesion (12.3 ± 5.0 vs. 15.4 ± 8.4 s, p < .001), higher average CF (17.0 ± 8.5 vs. 10.5 ± 4.6 g, p < .001), and greater impedance reduction (9.5 ± 4.6 vs. 7.7 ± 4.1 ohms, p < .001). HFLTV ventilation group also demonstrated shorter total procedural time (61.3 ± 25.5 vs. 90.8 ± 22.8 min, p < .001), ablation time (40.5 ± 18.6 vs. 65.8 ± 22.5 min, p < .001), and RF time (15.3 ± 4.8 vs. 22.9 ± 9.7 min, p < .001). CONCLUSION: HFLTV ventilation during PVI for PAF was associated with improved ablation lesion parameters and procedural efficiency compared to SV.

Data Analysis of Heart Rate Variability and Arrhythmia in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of arrhythmia. Heart rate variability (HRV) may be associated with AF risk. The aim of this study was to test HRV indices and arrhythmias as predictors of paroxysmal AF based on 24-hour dynamic electrocardiogram recordings of patients. METHODS: A total of 199 patients with paroxysmal AF (AF group) and 204 elderly volunteers over 60 years old (Control group) who underwent a 24-hour dynamic electrocardiogram from August 2022 to March 2023 were included. Time-domain indices, frequency-domain indices, and arrhythmia data of the two groups were classified and measured. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed on variables with significant differences to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram prediction model was established, and the sum of individual scores of each variable was calculated. RESULTS: Gender, age, body mass index and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) did not differ significantly between AF and Control groups (p > 0.05), whereas significant group differences were found for smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (p < 0.05). The standard deviation of all normal to normal (NN) R-R intervals (SDNN), standard deviation of 5-minute average NN intervals (SDANN), root mean square of successive NN interval differences (rMSSD), 50 ms from the preceding interval (pNN50), low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF), LF, premature atrial contractions (PACs), atrial tachycardia (AT), T-wave index, and ST-segment index differed significantly between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis identified rMSSD, PACs, and AT as independent predictors of AF. For each unit increase in rMSSD and PACs, the odds of developing AF increased by 1.0357 and 1.0005 times, respectively. For each unit increase in AT, the odds of developing AF decreased by 0.9976 times. The total score of the nomogram prediction model ranged from 0 to 110. CONCLUSION: The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a pivotal role in the occurrence and development of AF. The individualized nomogram prediction model of AF occurrence contributes to the early identification of high-risk patients with AF.

VARIPULSE: A step-by-step guide to pulmonary vein isolation.

INTRODUCTION: The VARIPULSE™ variable-loop circular catheter (VLCC) is a bidirectional, multielectrode catheter that can perform electrophysiological mapping and deliver pulsed field energy through the TRUPULSE™ Generator for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. This ablation system, including the CARTO 3™ three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system, represents a fully integrated system. METHODS: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel, primarily cardiac tissue-selective ablation technology with a minimal thermal effect, potentially eliminating the collateral tissue damage associated with radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation. Integration of a mapping system may lead to shorter fluoroscopy times and improve the usability of the system, allowing tracking of energy density and placement to confirm no areas around the vein are left untreated. RESULTS: This step-by-step review covers patient selection, mapping, the step-by-step ablation workflow, details on catheter repositioning and ensuring contact, considerations for ablation of specific anatomical variations, and discussion of ablation without fluoroscopy based on our initial clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: The VLCC is part of the fully integrated PFA system designed for pulmonary vein isolation, using mapping to guide catheter placement and lesion set creation. The current workflow, which is based on our initial clinical experience, may be further refined as the PFA system is used in real-world settings.

Pulsed-field ablation versus thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis.

Background: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an alternative to thermal ablation (TA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving catheter-based therapy for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, its efficacy and safety have yet to be fully elucidated. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the acute and long-term efficacies and safety of PFA and TA. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials comparing PFA and TA in patients with AF undergoing their first PVI ablation. The TA group was divided into cryoballoon (CB) and radiofrequency subgroups. AF patients were divided into paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) subgroups for further analysis. Results: Eighteen studies involving 4998 patients (35.2% PFA) were included. Overall, PFA was associated with a shorter procedure time (mean difference [MD] -21.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] -32.81 to -10.54) but longer fluoroscopy time (MD 4.53; 95% CI 2.18-6.88) than TA. Regarding safety, lower (peri-)esophageal injury rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.17; 95% CI 0.06-0.46) and higher tamponade rates (OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.27-7.00) were observed after PFA. In efficacy assessment, PFA was associated with a better first-pass isolation rate (OR 6.82; 95% CI 1.37-34.01) and a lower treatment failure rate (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.70-0.98). Subgroup analysis showed no differences in PersAF and PAF. CB was related to higher (peri)esophageal injury, and lower PVI acute success and procedural time. Conclusion: Compared to TA, PFA showed better results with regard to acute and long-term efficacy but significant differences in safety, with lower (peri)esophageal injury rates but higher tamponade rates in procedural data.

Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: between Present and Future.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the established cornerstone for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, indeed current guidelines recognize PVI as the gold standard for first-time AF ablation, regardless of if it is paroxysmal or persistent. Since 1998 when Haïssaguerre pioneered AF ablation demonstrating a burden reduction after segmental pulmonary vein (PV) ablation, our approach to PVI was superior in terms of methodology and technology. This review aims to describe how paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation has evolved over the last twenty years. We will focus on available techniques, a mechanistic understanding of paroxysmal AF genesis and the possibility of a tailored approach for the treatment of AF, before concluding with a future perspective.

Radiofrequency Ablation, Cryotherapy Ablation, or Pulsed-Field Ablation to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Unresponsive to Pharmacological Treatments: Interpreting Efficacy Through Reconstruction of Individual Patient Data From Randomized Trials.

Three techniques of catheter ablation (CA; radiofrequency, cryoballoon, and pulsed-field ablation) are available to treat patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who do not adequately respond to pharmacological treatments. Our study was aimed at comparing these techniques based on the data of randomized studies because these are considered the best sources of efficacy data. After selecting pertinent trials, our analysis studied the time-to-event data published for these three techniques. An artificial intelligence method was used that reconstructs individual patient data from the Kaplan-Meier curves. The endpoint was an arrhythmia recurrence. A preliminary heterogeneity analysis was performed. Then, our main analysis was based on individual patient data reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier graphs. The hazard ratio (HR) was its main parameter. Three randomized trials were included. Our heterogeneity analysis confirmed an acceptable level of between-trial heterogeneity that allowed us to pool the curves from the different trials; however, cryoballoon ablation with a two-minute duration fared worse than the other techniques. Then, our main analysis estimated the following values of HR: pulsed-field ablation versus radiofrequency ablation, 0.549 (95%CI, 0.413-0.730; p<0.001); pulsed-field ablation versus cryoballoon ablation, 0.478 (95%CI, 0.364-0.633); radiofrequency ablation versus cryoballoon ablation, HR=0.871 (95%CI, 0.585-1.295; p=0.506). In conclusion, radiofrequency ablation and cryoballoon ablation showed similar effectiveness (except for the two-minute cryoballoon ablation, which fared worse). Our results showing the superiority of pulsed-field ablation versus thermal ablation must be interpreted with caution because the patients given pulsed-field ablation were limited, and their follow-up was shorter than that of patients receiving thermal ablation.

Validation and clinical application of implantable loop recorders for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation in horses.

BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) occurs sporadically and can impair athletic performance. Gold standard for diagnosis is surface electrocardiography (ECG), however, this requires AF to be sustained. Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are routinely used for AF detection in human medicine. While ILR placement has been studied in horses, its AF detection performance is unknown. OBJECTIVES: (I) Validation of ILRs for AF detection in horses. (II) Determining pAF incidence using ILRs and estimate the positive predictive value (PPV). STUDY DESIGN: (I) Experimental study; (II) Longitudinal observational study. METHODS: (I) Implantation of ILRs in 15 horses with AF and 13 horses in sinus rhythm. Holter ECGs were recorded at: 1, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks of AF. The ILR ECGs were compared with surface ECGs to assess diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. (II) Eighty horses (43 Warmbloods, 37 Standardbreds) with ILRs were monitored for 367 days [IQR 208-621]. RESULTS: (I) ILRs detected AF on all recording days, in horses with AF, with a sensitivity of 66.1% (95% CI: 65.8-66.5) and a specificity of 99.99% (95% CI: 99.97-99.99). The sensitivity remained consistent across all time points. (II) The incidence of pAF was 6.3% (5/80). In horses with pAF, the PPV ranged from 8% to 87%. Increased body condition score (BCS > 6/9) was associated with an increased number of false positive episodes (p = 0.005). MAIN LIMITATIONS: (I) Horses were stabled during the ECG recordings, and AF was induced, rather than naturally occurring pAF. (II) Integrated algorithm in this ILR is optimised for AF detection in humans using remote monitors. Additionally, sensing is affected by motion artefacts. CONCLUSION: The ILR reliably detected AF in resting horses, particularly in horses with normal BCS (6/9). The ILR proved useful to detect pAF and is recommended alongside Holter monitoring for diagnostic workup of horses with suspected pAF.

Association of Paroxysmal Versus Persistent Atrial Fibrillation with In-hospital Outcomes and 30-day Readmission After Inpatient Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Knowledge of the impact of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation on in-hospital outcomes and 30-day readmission remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes and 30-day readmission rates among patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF who were hospitalized for AF ablation. Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged ≥18 years with AF who were hospitalized and underwent catheter ablation during 2017-2020. Then, we compared the in-hospital procedural outcomes and 30-day readmission rates between patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF, respectively. Our study included 7310 index admissions for paroxysmal AF ablation and 9179 index admissions for persistent AF ablation. According to our analysis, there was no significant difference in procedural complications-namely, cerebrovascular accident, vascular complications, major bleeding requiring blood transfusion, phrenic nerve palsy, pericardial complications, and systemic embolization-between the persistent and paroxysmal AF groups. There was also no significant difference in early mortality between these groups (0.5% vs. 0.7%; P = .22). Persistent AF patients had significantly higher rates of prolonged index hospitalization (9.9% vs. 7.2%; P < .01) and non-home discharge (4.8% vs. 3.1%; P < .01). The 30-day readmission rates were comparable in both groups (10.0% vs. 9.5%; P = .34), with recurrent AF and heart failure being two of the most common causes of cardiac-related readmissions. Catheter ablation among hospitalized patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF resulted in no significant difference in procedural complications, early mortality, or 30-day readmission. This suggests that catheter ablation of AF can be performed with a relatively similar safety profile for both paroxysmal and persistent AF.

The association between systemic inflammation markers and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation markers have recently been identified as being associated with cardiac disorders. However, limited research has been conducted to estimate the pre-diagnostic associations between these markers and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Our aim is to identify potential biomarkers for early detection of PAF. METHODS: 91 participants in the PAF group and 97 participants in the non-PAF group were included in this study. We investigated the correlations between three systemic inflammation markers, namely the systemic immune inflammation index (SII), system inflammation response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), and PAF. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with PAF gradually increased with increasing logSII, logSIRI, and logAISI tertiles. Compared to those in the lowest tertiles, the PAF risks in the highest logSII and logSIRI tertiles were 3.2-fold and 2.9-fold, respectively. Conversely, there was no significant correlation observed between logAISI and PAF risk within the highest tertile of logAISI. The restricted cubic splines (RCS) analysis revealed a non-linear relationship between the elevation of systemic inflammation markers and PAF risk. Specifically, the incidence of PAF is respectively increased by 56%, 95%, and 150% for each standard deviation increase in these variables. The ROC curve analysis of logSII, logSIRI and logAISI showed that they had AUC of 0.6, 0.7 and 0.6, respectively. It also demonstrated favorable sensitivity and specificity of these systemic inflammation markers in detecting the presence of PAF. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study reveals significant positive correlations between SII, SIRI, and AISI with the incidence of PAF.

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation history is associated with earlier recurrence after first cardioversion compared with primary persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) may progress through cardiac remodeling to persistent atrial fibrillation (psAF). However, some may present in psAF without a preceding history of pAF. A preceding history of pAF may affect recurrence after direct current cardioversion (DCCV). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether a preceding history of pAF is associated with a difference in recurrence rates after DCCV compared with patients without a preceding history of pAF. METHODS: A prospective procedural database at a Veterans Affairs center identified 565 patients who underwent their first DCCV for psAF. Initial rhythm history was separated by prior pAF, and those with none were considered primary psAF. Electrocardiography follow-up was standardized at 1 month and 3 months after cardioversion. RESULTS: Patients who underwent their first DCCV for psAF were more likely to have presented with primary psAF (81.6%). Those with pAF had a similar left atrial size but were more likely to have chronic kidney disease, sleep apnea, previous stroke, and use of antiarrhythmic drugs at the time of cardioversion. Patients with pAF had earlier recurrence and shorter median AF survival time, 1.6 months compared with 5 months (Kaplan-Meier plot, P = .0101). This difference persisted in controlling for antiarrhythmic drug use. Recurrence type was mostly persistent AF, similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with primary psAF may have a more sustained response to DCCV compared with those with a preceding history of pAF. Thus, those patients with pAF may benefit from a more aggressive, early rhythm control strategy because of higher likelihood of recurrence with DCCV.

Impact of Persistent Versus Paroxysmal Preoperative Atrial Fibrillation on In-Hospital, One-Year, and Late Clinical Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Previous reports on the impact of preexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have presented limited data on the relative impact of paroxysmal versus persistent AF subtypes. We compared in-hospital, 1-year, and late clinical outcomes in 1,098 patients who underwent TAVI with preoperative AF (556 paroxysmal, 542 persistent) versus 1,787 patients without AF. The propensity-matched cohorts with AF (n = 643) and without AF (n = 686) did not differ with respect to baseline clinical characteristics, operative technique, or in-hospital TAVI complications. At 1-year, patients with AF had higher all-cause mortality (9.0% vs 6.1%, p = 0.046) and readmission rates (13.1 vs 8.8%, p = 0.014), with lower Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire scores (77.8 ± 21.8 vs 84.3 ± 17.1, p <0.001). Echocardiographic follow-up (mean time 455 ± 285 days) demonstrated no significant intergroup differences in hemodynamic findings other than a progressive increase in left atrial volume index in patient subgroups (without AF: 37.4 ± 14.7 ml/m2 vs paroxysmal AF: 46.4 ± 21.4 ml/m2 vs persistent AF: 60.5 ± 26.3 ml/m2, p <0.001). On late follow-up (mean time 49.0 [45.1 to 52.9] months), patients with persistent AF had worse all-cause mortality than patients without AF (hazard ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 2.06, p = 0.003), with no significant survival differences between the paroxysmal AF and without AF subgroups. In conclusion, patients with preexisting AF and patients without AF who underwent TAVI had similar in-hospital outcomes but worse 1-year mortality, hospital readmission, and quality of life outcomes. Compared with patients without AF, patients with persistent but not paroxysmal preexisting AF have higher late all-cause mortality at a mean follow-up of 49 months. Patients with persistent AF have higher levels of left atrial volume index than patients with paroxysmal AF and patients without AF on intermediate echocardiographic follow-up.

The Role of Galectin-3 Levels for Predicting Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

Background/Objectives: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is an important cause that is thought main potential factor in Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Extended Holter ECG is an expensive and time-consuming examination. It needs another tools for predicting PAF in ESUS patients. In this study, serum galectin-3 levels, ECG parameters (PR interval, P wave time and P wave peak time) LA volume index, LA global peak strain and atrial electromechanical conduction time values were investigated for predicting PAF. Methods: 150 patients with ESUS and 30 volunteers for the control group were recruited to study. 48-72 h Holter ECG monitoring was used for detecting PAF. Patients were divided into two groups (ESUS + PAF and ESUS-PAF) according to the development of PAF in Holter ECG monitoring. Results: 30 patients with ESUS whose Holter ECG monitoring showed PAF, were recruited to the ESUS + PAF group. Other 120 patients with ESUS were recruited to the ESUS-PAF group. PA lateral, PA septum, and PA tricuspid were higher in the ESUS + PAF group (p < 0.001 for all). Serum galectin-3 levels were significantly higher in ESUS + PAF than in ESUS-PAF and control groups (479.0 pg/mL ± 435.8 pg/mL, 297.8 pg/mL ± 280.3 pg/mL, and 125.4 ± 87.0 pg/mL, p < 0.001, respectively). Serum galectin-3 levels were significantly correlated with LAVI, PA lateral, and global peak LA strain (r = 0.246, p = 0.001, p = 0.158, p = 0.035, r = -0.176, p = 0.018, respectively). Conclusion: Serum galectin-3 levels is found higher in ESUS patients which developed PAF and Serum galectin-3 levels are associated LA adverse remodeling in patients with ESUS.

Study of P wave dispersion in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and its role in prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence.

BACKGROUND: It has been known that increased P wave duration and P wave dispersion reflect prolongation of intra-atrial and interatrial conduction time and the inhomogeneous propagation of sinus impulses, which are well-known electrophysiologic characteristics in patients with atrial arrhythmias and especially paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The objective of this study was assessment of P wave dispersion value in cases with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and its role in predicting recurrence. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients with documented paroxysmal AF were subjected to clinical evaluation, electrocardiogram and routine Doppler echocardiogram. We found that a statistically significant association was detected between P wave dispersion and older age, diabetic and hypertensive cases with positive correlation also detected with left atrial dimension (LAD), left ventricle size and diastolic dysfunction grade. Mean corrected P wave dispersion and corrected QT interval were higher among cases using sotalol, ca channel blockers, among cases using nitrates and among cases with Morris index > 0.04. Higher mean value of corrected QT was associated with biphasic P v1 shape. Old age, female sex, P wave dispersion and QT wave dispersion are statistically significant predictors of PAF recurrence. CONCLUSION: P wave dispersion in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was strongly correlated to older age, diabetic and hypertensive patients and also with left atrial dimension (LAD), left ventricle size and diastolic dysfunction grade. Also, mean corrected P wave dispersion can predict atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with Morris index > 0.04, old age, female sex, and QT wave dispersion.

Prevalence of atrial fibrillation on a 24-hour Holter in adult Indians.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence in Indian adults who completed 24-Hour Holter monitoring. METHODS: A total of 23,847 patients (36.9 % women) were analyzed for AF duration using a software algorithm. RESULTS: AF was diagnosed in 4153 (17.4 %) patients with a median AF duration of 13 min and 55 s. CONCLUSION: AF prevalence was high and largely untreated. The short duration of AF episodes indicates a low likelihood of detection during clinical visits, highlighting its potential underestimation in Indian healthcare.

Association of beat-to-beat P-wave analysis index to the extent of left atrial low-voltage areas in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) fibrosis has been shown to be associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. Beat-to-beat (B2B) index is a non-invasive classifier, based on B2B P-wave morphological and wavelet analysis, shown to be associated with AF incidence and recurrence. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the B2B index is associated with the extent of LA low-voltage areas (LVAs) on electroanatomical mapping. METHODS: Patients with paroxysmal AF scheduled for pulmonary vein isolation, without evident structural remodeling, were included. Pre-ablation electroanatomical voltage maps were used to calculate the surface of LVAs (<0.5 mV). B2B index was compared between patients with small versus large LVAs. RESULTS: 35 patients were included (87% male, median age 62). The median surface area of LVAs was 7.7 (4.4-15.8) cm2 corresponding to 5.6 (3.3-12.1) % of LA endocardial surface. B2B index was 0.57 (0.52-0.59) in patients with small LVAs (below the median) compared to 0.65 (0.56-0.77) in those with large LVAs (above the median) (p = 0.009). In the receiver operator characteristic curve analysis for predicting large LVAs, the c-statistic was 0.75 (p = 0.006) for B2B index and 0.81 for the multivariable model including B2B index (multivariable p = 0.04) and P-wave duration. CONCLUSION: In patients with paroxysmal AF without overt atrial myopathy, B2B P-wave analysis appears to be a useful non-invasive correlate of low-voltage areas-and thus fibrosis-in the LA. This finding establishes a pathophysiological basis for B2B index and its potential usefulness in the selection process of patients who are likely to benefit most from further invasive treatment.

Real-world data of radiofrequency catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Short- and long-term clinical outcomes from the prospective multicenter REAL-AF Registry.

BACKGROUND: The safety and long-term efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (CA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been well established. Contemporary techniques to optimize ablation delivery, reduce fluoroscopy use, and improve clinical outcomes have been developed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the contemporary real-world practice approach and short and long-term outcomes of RF CA for PAF through a prospective multicenter registry. METHODS: Using the REAL-AF (Real-world Experience of Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation; ClincalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04088071) Registry, patients undergoing RF CA to treat PAF across 42 high-volume institutions and 79 experienced operators were evaluated. The procedures were performed using zero or reduced fluoroscopy, contact force sensing catheters, wide area circumferential ablation, and ablation index as a guide with a target of 380-420 for posterior and 500-550 for anterior lesions. The primary efficacy outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 2470 patients undergoing CA from January 2018 to December 2022 were included. Mean age was 65.2 ±11.14 years, and 44% were female. Most procedures were performed without fluoroscopy (71.5%), with average procedural and total RF times of 95.4 ± 41.7 minutes and 22.1±11.8 minutes, respectively. At 1-year follow-up, freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias was 81.6% with 89.7% of these patients off antiarrhythmic drugs. No significant difference was identified comparing pulmonary vein isolation vs pulmonary vein isolation plus ablation approaches. The complication rate was 1.9%. CONCLUSION: Refinement of RF CA to treat PAF using contemporary tools, standardized protocols, and electrophysiology laboratory workflows resulted in excellent short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

Impact of inter-lesion distance and first-pass isolation on outcomes of pulmonary venous isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Contiguity of ablation lesions is a critical determinant of success for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation. Evidence supports maintaining an inter-lesional distance (ILD) ≤ 6 mm during pulmonary venous isolation (PVI). Meanwhile, first-pass isolation (FPI) on PVI outcome in follow-up was not deeply studied. The impact of ILD and FPI on PAF ablation outcomes was investigated. METHODS: Consecutive PAF patients who underwent first-time antral PVI were recruited. Coordinates of ablation points were extracted from the electro-anatomical mapping system and analyzed using custom-developed software to determine the ILD. A gap is defined as ILD greater than 6 mm. FPI was defined as the achievement of PVI by encircling the ipsilateral veins while simultaneously recording their electrical activity using a multipolar catheter. The primary endpoint was freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias including AF, atrial tachycardia (AT), or atrial flutter (AFL) lasting longer than 30 s during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients underwent first-time antral PVI. During 13.3 ± 0.6 months of follow-up, atrial arrhythmias recurrence was noted in 22.9% of the patients. Atrial arrhythmia recurrence was significantly higher in patients with more gaps (> 2) (37.0% versus 11.9%, P < 0.01), and the number of gaps was an independent predictor of AF/AT/AFL recurrence. (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.40, P = 0.02). The group with FPI for at least one ipsilateral pair of PVs exhibited a decreased number of gaps (2.0 versus 7.0, P < 0.01) and demonstrated a significant correlation with a reduction of recurrence (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.71, P = 0.01). Among 16 patients who underwent repeat ablation, the number of gaps during the index PVI was associated with PV reconnection (PVR) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Gaps created during PVI are a modifiable determinant of AF/AT/AFL recurrence, and avoidance of gaps is crucial to improve clinical outcomes of PAF ablation. In addition, FPI exhibited a strong predictive capability for clinical success in patients with PAF.