Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 135
Filter
1.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 55(3): 1058-1068, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028397

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) has emerged as an alternative to open technique in treating periampullary tumors. However, the safety and efficacy of LPD compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) remain unclear. Thus, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LPD versus OPD in patients with periampullary tumors, with a particular focus on the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient subgroup. METHODS: According to PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in December 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compare LPD versus OPD in patients with periampullary tumors. Endpoints and sensitive analysis were conducted for short-term endpoints. All statistical analysis was performed using R software version 4.3.1 with a random-effects model. RESULTS: Five RCTs yielding 1018 patients with periampullary tumors were included, of whom 511 (50.2%) were randomized to the LPD group. Total follow-up time was 90 days. LPD was associated with a longer operation time (MD 66.75; 95% CI 26.59 to 106.92; p = 0.001; I2 = 87%; Fig. 1A), lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 124.05; 95% CI - 178.56 to - 69.53; p < 0.001; I2 = 86%; Fig. 1B), and shorter length of stay (MD - 1.37; 95% IC - 2.31 to - 0.43; p = 0.004; I2 = 14%; Fig. 1C) as compared with OPD. In terms of 90-day mortality rates and number of lymph nodes yield, no significant differences were found between both groups. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that LPD is an effective and safe alternative for patients with periampullary tumors, with lower intraoperative blood loss and shorter length of stay.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Laparoscopy , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Humans , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Ampulla of Vater/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/mortality , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Operative Time , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
3.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(1): 33-39, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353072

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Metastatic disease in the regional lymph nodes (LNs) is a strong indicator of worse outcomes among patients after curative-intent resection of ampullary cancer (AC). This study aimed to ascertain the threshold number of examined LNs (ELNs) for AC to compare the prognosis accuracy of various nodal classification schemes relative to long-term prognosis. METHODS: Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for AC (2004-2019) were identified using the National Cancer Database. Locally weighted regression scatter plot smoothing (LOWESS) curves were used to ascertain the optimal cut point for ELNs. The accuracy of the American Joint Committee on Cancer N classification, LN ratio, and log odds transformation (LODDS) ratio to stratify patients relative to survival was examined. RESULTS: Among 8127 patients with AC, 67% were male with a median age of 67 years (IQR, 59-74). Tumors were most frequently classified as T3 (34.9%), followed by T2 (30.6%); T1 (12.9%) and T4 (17.6%) were less common. LN metastasis was identified in 4606 patients (56.7%). Among patients with nodal disease, 37.0% and 19.7% had N1 and N2 disease, respectively. The LOWESS curves identified an inflection cutoff point in the hazard of survival at 20 ELNs. The survival benefit of 20 ELNs was more pronounced among patients without LN metastasis vs patients with N1 disease (median overall survival [OS]: 54.1 months [IQR, 45.9-62.1] in ≥20 ELNs vs 39.0 months [IQR, 35.8-42.2] in <20 ELNs; P < .001) or N2 disease (median OS: 22.5 months [IQR, 18.9-26.2] in ≥20 ELNs vs 25.4 months [IQR, 23.3-27.6] in <20 ELNs; P < .001). When comparing the 4 different N classification schemes, the LODDS classification scheme yielded the highest predictive ability. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of a minimum of 20 LNs was needed to stratify patients with AC relative to the prognosis and to minimize stage migration. The LODDS nodal classification scheme had the highest prognostic accuracy to differentiate survival among patients after PD for AC.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Ampulla of Vater , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Female , Prognosis , Lymph Node Excision , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Ampulla of Vater/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph Nodes/pathology
7.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 52(3): 872-881, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32808236

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater has been increasing over the past years. Nevertheless, it is still a rare disease and the prognostic factors predicting long-term survival are not sufficiently clarified. This study aims to evaluate the association between histopathological characteristics and long-term survival of patients with ampullary cancer after curative resection, as well as the efficiency of immunohistochemical expression of CK7, CK20, and CDX2 to distinguish the histopathological (intestinal or pancreaticobiliary) patterns. METHODS: Demographic, histopathological data, pTNM stage, and immunohistochemical expression patterns were collected from 65 patients with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Five and 10-year overall and disease-free survival rates after curative resection were determined. RESULTS: Of the 65 patients with ampullary carcinoma, 47 (72%) underwent radical resection. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rate was 46% and 37%, respectively. Our results demonstrate that the main prognostic factors were the presence and number of lymph node metastases, lymph node ratio (LNR), differentiation grade, and lymphovascular invasion. After multivariate analysis, only lymph node ratio ≥ 20% remained an independent prognostic factor of survival (HR: 2.63 95% CI: 1.05-6.61; p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Here, we demonstrated more evidence that the lymph node metastases are associated with poor prognosis in ampullary carcinoma. Particularly, the relation between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and the number of harvested lymph node (LNR) should be considered a major prognostic factor.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Ampulla of Vater/pathology , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/epidemiology , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Biomarkers, Tumor , Brazil , CDX2 Transcription Factor , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Databases, Factual , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Keratin-20 , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Survival Rate , Young Adult
8.
Arq Gastroenterol ; 57(3): 300-305, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32935746

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillectomy has been conceived as a less invasive therapeutic option for treatment of early neoplastic lesions located at the major duodenal papilla. OBJECTIVE: Evaluating patients with early ampullary lesions who underwent curative intent endoscopic papillectomy related to technical success (histopathological tumor margin assessment) and safety (adverse event rate). METHODS: A retrospective study including consecutive patients who underwent curative intent endoscopic papillectomy for demographic, histopathological and pre-/post-procedural clinical assessment. Endpoints were technical success (histopathological residual tumor assessment) and adverse events rates. RESULTS: A total of 21 medical records patients with a female predominance (13 cases, 61.9%) were included. The tumor was incidental in 8 (38%) cases. Negative residual tumor resection margin rate was 72% (15 cases); three of these cases confirmed high-grade dysplasia in the resected specimen, and six cases were invasive neoplasia. Tumoral recurrence was seen in two cases, and median follow-up time was 12 months, with a 23% loss rate (five patients). Six (28.5%) patients had adverse events, all of them early (bleeding and pancreatitis); none of them required surgical intervention and there was no mortality. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic papillectomy allowed for technical successful procedure with complete removal of ampullary neoplastic lesions in the majority of cases with acceptable adverse event rates. Recurrence rate should be carefully assessed in further studies. There was a recent increase in the number of procedures. There was also a low correlation between pre- and post-histopathological assessment regarding the presence of invasive carcinoma and adenoma with high grade dysplasia, with a predominance of superficial neoplastic adenomatous lesions.


Subject(s)
Ampulla of Vater , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
9.
Arq. gastroenterol ; Arq. gastroenterol;57(3): 300-305, July-Sept. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1131675

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillectomy has been conceived as a less invasive therapeutic option for treatment of early neoplastic lesions located at the major duodenal papilla. OBJECTIVE: Evaluating patients with early ampullary lesions who underwent curative intent endoscopic papillectomy related to technical success (histopathological tumor margin assessment) and safety (adverse event rate). METHODS: A retrospective study including consecutive patients who underwent curative intent endoscopic papillectomy for demographic, histopathological and pre-/post-procedural clinical assessment. Endpoints were technical success (histopathological residual tumor assessment) and adverse events rates. RESULTS: A total of 21 medical records patients with a female predominance (13 cases, 61.9%) were included. The tumor was incidental in 8 (38%) cases. Negative residual tumor resection margin rate was 72% (15 cases); three of these cases confirmed high-grade dysplasia in the resected specimen, and six cases were invasive neoplasia. Tumoral recurrence was seen in two cases, and median follow-up time was 12 months, with a 23% loss rate (five patients). Six (28.5%) patients had adverse events, all of them early (bleeding and pancreatitis); none of them required surgical intervention and there was no mortality. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic papillectomy allowed for technical successful procedure with complete removal of ampullary neoplastic lesions in the majority of cases with acceptable adverse event rates. Recurrence rate should be carefully assessed in further studies. There was a recent increase in the number of procedures. There was also a low correlation between pre- and post-histopathological assessment regarding the presence of invasive carcinoma and adenoma with high grade dysplasia, with a predominance of superficial neoplastic adenomatous lesions.


RESUMO CONTEXTO: A papilectomia endoscópica tem sido a opção terapêutica menos invasiva no tratamento de tumores precoces que acometem a papila duodenal maior. OBJETIVO: Avaliar pacientes com tumores ampulares precoces submetidos a papilectomia endoscópica com finalidade curativa, com relação ao sucesso técnico (avaliação histopatológica da margem tumoral) e sua segurança (taxa de eventos adversos [EAs]). MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados retrospectivamente dados demográficos, exame histopatológico e evolução clínica pré e pós-procedimento de pacientes consecutivos submetidos a papilectomia endoscópica. Os desfechos avaliados foram o sucesso técnico (avaliação histopatológica de tumor residual) e taxa de EAs. RESULTADOS: Um total de 21 prontuários de pacientes com predominância feminina (13 casos, 61,9%) foi incluído no estudo. O diagnóstico tumoral foi incidental em 8 (38%) casos. A taxa de margem de ressecção negativa foi 72% (15 casos); três destas lesões confirmaram displasia de alto grau (DAG) no espécime ressecado e seis casos de neoplasia invasora. Houve recorrência tumoral em dois casos e a mediana de seguimento foi de 12 meses, com 23% de taxa de perda de seguimento (cinco casos). Seis (28,5%) pacientes apresentaram EAs, todos precoces (hemorragia e pancreatite aguda); nenhum destes necessitou de intervenção cirúrgica e não houve mortalidade. CONCLUSÃO: A papilectomia endoscópica permitiu sucesso técnico, com a completa remoção de lesões neoplásicas ampulares na maioria dos casos com taxa de EAs aceitáveis. A taxa de recorrência tumoral deve ser cuidadosamente avaliada em estudos futuros. Houve um aumento recente do número de procedimentos realizados. Também houve baixa correlação entre o diagnóstico histológico pré e pós-procedimento para a presença de adenocarcinoma invasor e adenoma com DAG, com predomínio de lesões adenomatosas superficiais.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
10.
Cir Cir ; 88(3): 263-268, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32539015

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy or Whipple's operation, is the elective surgical procedure to treat different periampullary diseases. Through the years this surgery has been doing open, but in the lasts decades thanks to the improve technology and trained surgeons, today is feasible doing it laparoscopic with good results. OBJECTIVE: To present the initial experience and results in totally laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in Hospital Regional ISSSTE Puebla, reporting the second number of cases in México. METHOD: Since July 2014-July 2018, 8 patients has been operated by totally laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy, 7 in Hospital Regional ISSSTE Puebla and 1 in a private Hospital. RESULTS: Evaluating all the patients, not one had mortality during operation, no morbidity or immediate reoperation, so the results are favourable. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is a very complex procedure but feasible, and good results depends on various factors, like the appropriate patient selection.


ANTECEDENTES: La pancreatoduodenectomía o cirugía de Whipple es el procedimiento de elección en el tratamiento de las enfermedades periampulares. A través de los años se ha realizado de manera abierta, y actualmente, gracias a la mejora de los recursos humanos y tecnológicos, se realiza este procedimiento por mínima invasión con buenos resultados. OBJETIVO: Presentar la experiencia inicial en la pancreatoduodenectomía totalmente laparoscópica en el Hospital de Alta Especialidad del Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE) de Puebla, dando a conocer la segunda serie de casos reportada en México. MÉTODO: De julio de 2014 a julio de 2018 se han realizado ocho pancreatoduodenectomías totalmente laparoscópicas, siete en el hospital de alta especialidad ISSSTE Puebla y una en un hospital privado. RESULTADOS: En todos los pacientes intervenidos los resultados son favorables, sin mortalidad transoperatoria y sin presentar complicaciones graves ni reintervención. CONCLUSIÓN: La pancreatoduodenectomía laparoscópica es un procedimiento de alta complejidad que, teniendo una adecuada selección de pacientes y un manejo multidisciplinario, se puede llevar a cabo con excelentes resultados.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/methods , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adult , Aged , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Hospitals, Special/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/statistics & numerical data , Patient Positioning , Patient Selection , Procedures and Techniques Utilization , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
11.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 22(8): 1407-1413, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31927720

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Given the lack of evidence on the best adjuvant approach, this review closely examines optimal adjuvant management for resected true ampullary cancer and its histological subtypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed was performed to identify studies on resected true ampullary cancers, published between January 2010 and December 2018. Data including the use of radiation, chemotherapy or chemoradiation and the outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 116 records were identified, of which 65 screened were selected. Finally, nine studies were included. Only two of the studies reported separately the outcomes of pancreatobiliary and intestinal subtypes. Patients in the selected studies were treated with a pancreaticoduodenectomy with negative margins. Patients treated with adjuvant therapy were more likely to be pT3-4 and have positive nodes; median survival ranged from 30 to 47 months. A significant benefit for adjuvant treatment was observed in four of the studies, restricted to patients at stage IIB or higher. Likewise, patients with positive nodes may have a longer median survival with adjuvant chemoradiation compared to observation. CONCLUSIONS: The present review suggests a benefit for adjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced tumors. Randomized trials are needed to ascertain the topic, as well as studies reporting toxicity and quality of life of resected true ampullary cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Ampulla of Vater , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Ampulla of Vater/pathology , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Carcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma/surgery , Carcinoma/therapy , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Duodenal Neoplasms/pathology , Duodenal Neoplasms/surgery , Duodenal Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
12.
Rev. gastroenterol. Perú ; 39(4): 335-343, oct.-dic 2019. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1144618

ABSTRACT

Antecedentes: La canulación biliar difícil es un factor de riesgo para la pancreatitis post-CPRE. En estos casos el precorte es la técnica más usada. Objetivo: Demostrar que el precorte tipo fistulotomía es seguro y eficaz. Materiales y métodos: Se revisaron los datos de mayo de 2016 a mayo de 2018. Se definió canulación difícil como: litiasis impactada, canulación inadvertida del conducto pancreático en tres ocasiones e incapacidad para lograr la canulación en 3 minutos. Las medidas de resultados fueron la canulación biliar exitosa y la pancreatitis post-CPRE. Resultados: Se realizó precorte tipo fistulotomía en 96 casos (67 mujeres, 29 hombres). La tasa de éxito de la canulación biliar fue del 95,8% (92/96). Ochenta pacientes tenían factores de riesgo para pancreatitis post CPRE: 29 tuvieron un solo factor de riesgo, 26 tuvieron dos, 19 tuvieron tres y 6 tuvieron cuatro. Factores de riesgo ampulares de canulación difícil: calculo impactado 9 casos, abultamiento de la papila en 10 casos, ubicación inferior del orificio papilar en 38 casos, localización parcial del poro papilar en 23 y estenosis del orificio papilar en 16 casos. Diez pacientes tuvieron divertículo periampular, 7 pacientes tuvieron conducto biliar normal. Ninguno de los pacientes experimentó pancreatitis. Tres pacientes tuvieron sangrado precoz, una paciente presento sangrado tardío. Un paciente (2%) tuvo fiebre y fue hospitalizado. Conclusiones: En casos de canulación biliar difícil el precorte tipo fistulotomía es seguro y eficaz.


Background: Difficult biliary cannulation is a risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis. In these cases, precutting is the most used technique. Objective: To demonstrate that precut fistulotomy is safe and effective. Materials and methods: Data from May 2016 to May 2018 were reviewed. Difficult cannulation was defined as: impacted lithiasis, inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct on three occasions and inability to achieve deep biliary cannulation in 3 minutes. The outcome measures were successful biliary cannulation and post-ERCP Pancreatitis. Results: Precut fistulotomy was performed in 96 cases (67 women, 29 men). The success rate of biliary cannulation was 95.8% (92/96). Eighty patients had risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: 29 had 1 risk factor, 26 had 2 risk factors, 19 had 3 risk factors, and 6 had four risk factors. Ampullary risk factors of difficult cannulation: impacted stone in the papilla: 9 cases, papilla bulging: 10 cases, lower location of the hole papillary 38 cases, partial location of the papillary pore 23 and papillary orifice stenosis 16 cases. Ten patients had periampullary diverticulum, 7 patients had normal bile duct. None of the patients experienced Pancreatitis. Three patients had early bleeding, one patient had late bleeding. One patient (2%) had a fever and was hospitalized. Conclusions: In cases of difficult biliary cannulation, the precut fistulotomy is safe and effective.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Pancreatitis/prevention & control , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Catheterization/methods , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects , Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic/methods , Pancreatic Ducts , Pancreatitis/etiology , Time Factors , Ampulla of Vater/diagnostic imaging , Bile Ducts , Catheterization/adverse effects , Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/methods
13.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 71(3): 261-265, jun. 2019. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1058267

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los carcinomas adenoneuroendocrinos mixtos (MANEC) son tipos de tumores bifásicos, reconocidos morfológicamente ante la presencia de una formación neoplásica constituida de manera simultánea por epitelio glandular y células neuroendocrinas. Dentro del tracto gastrointestinal, estas neoplasias predominan en el estómago o el colon. Solo 19 casos localizados en la ampolla de Vater han sido reportados por la literatura. OBJETIVO: Reportar un caso de MANEC; revisar la epidemiología, pronóstico y tratamiento de estos tumores. MATERIALES Y MÉTODO: Presentación de caso clínico de una paciente con diagnóstico de adenocarcinoma neuroendocrino mixto de la región ampular. DISCUSIÓN: La presentación clínica, el manejo y el pronóstico son similares al del adenocarcinoma ampular. Se diagnostican con el examen histopatológico de la muestra resecada. Ambos componentes deben ser histológicamente malignos, y cada uno de ellos debe representar al menos el 30% de la lesión. CONCLUSIÓN: Los MANEC ampulares son tumores poco comunes a nivel mundial, siendo éste el primer caso reportado en nuestro instituto.


INTRODUCTION: Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANEC) are types of biphasic tumors, morphologically recognized in the presence of a neoplastic formation constituted simultaneously by glandular epithelium and neuroendocrine cells. Only 19 cases located in the ampulla of Vater have been reported in the literature. Within the gastrointestinal tract, these neoplasms predominate in the stomach or colon. AIM: Report a case of MANEC; review of the epidemiology, prognosis and treatment of these tumors. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Case presentation of a patient diagnosed with mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ampullary region. DISCUSSION: The clinical presentation, management and prognosis are similar to ampullary adenocarcinoma. These tumors are diagnosed with a histopathological examination of the resected specimen. Both components must be histologically malignant, and each of them must represent at least 30% of the lesion. CONCLUSION: MANEC of the ampulla are rare tumors worldwide, being this case the first reported in our institute.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/surgery , Ampulla of Vater/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/diagnostic imaging
14.
Rev Gastroenterol Peru ; 39(4): 335-343, 2019.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32097393

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Difficult biliary cannulation is a risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis. In these cases, precutting is the most used technique. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that precut fistulotomy is safe and effective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from May 2016 to May 2018 were reviewed. Difficult cannulation was defined as: impacted lithiasis, inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct on three occasions and inability to achieve deep biliary cannulation in 3 minutes. The outcome measures were successful biliary cannulation and post-ERCP Pancreatitis. RESULTS: Precut fistulotomy was performed in 96 cases (67 women, 29 men). The success rate of biliary cannulation was 95.8% (92/96). Eighty patients had risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: 29 had 1 risk factor, 26 had 2 risk factors, 19 had 3 risk factors, and 6 had four risk factors. Ampullary risk factors of difficult cannulation: impacted stone in the papilla: 9 cases, papilla bulging: 10 cases, lower location of the hole papillary 38 cases, partial location of the papillary pore 23 and papillary orifice stenosis 16 cases. Ten patients had periampullary diverticulum, 7 patients had normal bile duct. None of the patients experienced Pancreatitis. Three patients had early bleeding, one patient had late bleeding. One patient (2%) had a fever and was hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of difficult biliary cannulation, the precut fistulotomy is safe and effective.


Subject(s)
Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Catheterization/methods , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects , Pancreatitis/prevention & control , Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ampulla of Vater/diagnostic imaging , Bile Ducts , Catheterization/adverse effects , Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Ducts , Pancreatitis/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Young Adult
15.
Arq. gastroenterol ; Arq. gastroenterol;53(3): 156-162, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-787348

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background Bactibilia has several consequences to human health. Objetive Assessing the bile microbiology of patients with biliopancreatic diseases in order to identify bacteria and their possible infectious complications. Methods Retrospective study of 30 bile culture samples from patients with benign and malignant biliopancreatic diseases. The samples were assessed to set the bile microbiological flora and to search for its possible link with comorbidity, carcinogenesis and postoperative infectious complications. Results Thirty bile samples from patients at mean age ≈57.7 years, mostly female (n=18), were assessed. Bactibilia was found in 12 cases, mostly in patients with benign diseases (n=8), older than 50 years (n=23) and female (n=10). Adenocarcinoma of the duodenal papilla (n=9) and cholelithiasis (n=8) were the most common diseases. Escherichia coli (n=5) and Klebsiella sp (n=3) were predominantly found in patients with benign diseases; and Klebsiella sp (n=2) and Streptococcus sp (n=2) were prevalent in cancer patients. There were postoperative infectious complications in seven cases, five of them in bactibilia-associated patients (P=0.084). Conclusion Bactibilia was found in 12 samples and Escherichia coli and Klebsiella sp were most often identified in patients with benign diseases, as well as Streptococcus sp and Klebsiella sp in cancer patients. There was a trend of higher postoperative infectious complication incidence in patients with bactibilia.


RESUMO Contexto Bacteriobilia pode produzir várias consequências para a saúde humana. Objetivo Avaliar a microbiologia da bile de pacientes com doenças biliopancreáticas para identificar bactérias e possíveis consequências. Métodos Estudo retrospectivo microbiológico. Trinta amostras de bile de pacientes com doenças biliopancreáticas benignas e malignas foram avaliadas para determinar a flora microbiológica da bile e procurar alguma possível relação dessa com comorbidades, carcinogênese e complicações infecciosas pós-operatórias. Resultados As amostras de bile foram avaliadas em pacientes, com idade média ≈57,7 anos, a maioria mulheres (n=18). Evidenciou-se bacteriobilia em 12 casos, a maioria em pacientes com doenças benignas (n=8); pacientes com mais de 50 anos (n=23) e mulheres (n=10). As doenças mais comuns foram o adenocarcinoma de papila duodenal (n=9) e a colelitíase (n=8). Escherichia coli (n=5) e Klebsiella sp (n=5) foram as bactérias mais identificadas em pacientes com doenças benignas; sendo a Klebsiella sp (n=2) e o Streptococcus sp (n=2) as que predominaram nos pacientes com cânceres. As complicações pós-operatórias exclusivamente infecciosas ocorreram em sete casos, sendo em cinco desses associados à bacteriobilia (P=0,084). Conclusão Bacteriobilia foi evidenciada em 12 amostras, sendo as bactérias mais identificadas Escherichia coli e Klebsiella sp em pacientes com doenças benignas; e Streptococcus sp e Klebsiella sp nos pacientes com câncer. Existiu uma tendência a maior incidência de complicações infecciosas pós-operatórias em pacientes com bacteriobilia.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Ampulla of Vater/microbiology , Bile/microbiology , Adenocarcinoma/microbiology , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/microbiology , Choledocholithiasis/microbiology , Postoperative Complications , Streptococcus/isolation & purification , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Choledocholithiasis/surgery , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Fever/surgery , Klebsiella/isolation & purification , Middle Aged
16.
Arq Gastroenterol ; 53(3): 156-62, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27438420

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bactibilia has several consequences to human health. OBJETIVE: Assessing the bile microbiology of patients with biliopancreatic diseases in order to identify bacteria and their possible infectious complications. METHODS: Retrospective study of 30 bile culture samples from patients with benign and malignant biliopancreatic diseases. The samples were assessed to set the bile microbiological flora and to search for its possible link with comorbidity, carcinogenesis and postoperative infectious complications. RESULTS: Thirty bile samples from patients at mean age ≈57.7 years, mostly female (n=18), were assessed. Bactibilia was found in 12 cases, mostly in patients with benign diseases (n=8), older than 50 years (n=23) and female (n=10). Adenocarcinoma of the duodenal papilla (n=9) and cholelithiasis (n=8) were the most common diseases. Escherichia coli (n=5) and Klebsiella sp (n=3) were predominantly found in patients with benign diseases; and Klebsiella sp (n=2) and Streptococcus sp (n=2) were prevalent in cancer patients. There were postoperative infectious complications in seven cases, five of them in bactibilia-associated patients (P=0.084). CONCLUSION: Bactibilia was found in 12 samples and Escherichia coli and Klebsiella sp were most often identified in patients with benign diseases, as well as Streptococcus sp and Klebsiella sp in cancer patients. There was a trend of higher postoperative infectious complication incidence in patients with bactibilia.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/microbiology , Ampulla of Vater/microbiology , Bile/microbiology , Choledocholithiasis/microbiology , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/microbiology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Choledocholithiasis/surgery , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Female , Fever/surgery , Humans , Klebsiella/isolation & purification , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Streptococcus/isolation & purification , Young Adult
17.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 71(1): 28-35, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26872081

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to address the outcomes of endoscopic resection compared with surgery in the treatment of ampullary adenomas. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. For this purpose, the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Scopus and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases were scanned. Studies included patients with ampullary adenomas and data considering endoscopic treatment compared with surgery. The entire analysis was based on a fixed-effects model. Five retrospective cohort studies were selected (466 patients). All five studies (466 patients) had complete primary resection data available and showed a difference that favored surgical treatment (risk difference [RD] = -0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.44 to -0.04). Primary success data were identified in all five studies as well. Analysis showed that the surgical approach outperformed endoscopic treatment for this outcome (RD = -0.37, 95% CI = -0.50 to -0.24). Recurrence data were found in all studies (466 patients), with a benefit indicated for surgical treatment (RD = 0.10, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.19). Three studies (252 patients) presented complication data, but analysis showed no difference between the approaches for this parameter (RD = -0.15, 95% CI = -0.53 to 0.23). Considering complete primary resection, primary success and recurrence outcomes, the surgical approach achieves significantly better results. Regarding complication data, this systematic review concludes that rates are not significantly different.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/surgery , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Duodenal Neoplasms/surgery , Endoscopy/methods , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Humans , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome
18.
Clinics ; Clinics;71(1): 28-35, Jan. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-771946

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to address the outcomes of endoscopic resection compared with surgery in the treatment of ampullary adenomas. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. For this purpose, the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Scopus and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases were scanned. Studies included patients with ampullary adenomas and data considering endoscopic treatment compared with surgery. The entire analysis was based on a fixed-effects model. Five retrospective cohort studies were selected (466 patients). All five studies (466 patients) had complete primary resection data available and showed a difference that favored surgical treatment (risk difference [RD] = -0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.44 to -0.04). Primary success data were identified in all five studies as well. Analysis showed that the surgical approach outperformed endoscopic treatment for this outcome (RD = -0.37, 95% CI = -0.50 to -0.24). Recurrence data were found in all studies (466 patients), with a benefit indicated for surgical treatment (RD = 0.10, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.19). Three studies (252 patients) presented complication data, but analysis showed no difference between the approaches for this parameter (RD = -0.15, 95% CI = -0.53 to 0.23). Considering complete primary resection, primary success and recurrence outcomes, the surgical approach achieves significantly better results. Regarding complication data, this systematic review concludes that rates are not significantly different.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adenoma/surgery , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Duodenal Neoplasms/surgery , Endoscopy/methods , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL