Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.045
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 21711, 2024 09 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39289419

ABSTRACT

Following bowel surgery, infectious complications, including anastomotic leak (AL), remain major sources of morbidity and mortality. Bowel preparation is often administered with the assumption that gut decontamination reduces post-surgical complications. In this study, we tested this hypothesis using a murine model of colon surgery. The mice were fed either regular chow or a high-fat, high-sugar Western diet. The day before surgery, the mice received one of four interventions: water (control), mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), oral antibiotics (OA), or both MBP and OA. We found no differences in the rates of AL among the experimental groups, and diet did not appear to affect the outcomes. Exploratory analyses showed changes in the gut microbiome consistent with the different treatments, but investigations of fecal short-chain fatty acids and RNA sequencing of colonic tissue did not reveal specific effects of the treatments or the presence of AL. However, we did identify bacterial genera that may be causally associated with AL and developed a predictive index from stool samples as a marker for the presence of AL. Future research is needed to identify and validate a microbial predictive tool and to uncover the microbial-driven mechanisms that lead to AL.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Animals , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/microbiology , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Mice , Feces/microbiology , Colon/microbiology , Colon/surgery , Male , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Fatty Acids, Volatile/metabolism , Fatty Acids, Volatile/analysis , Disease Models, Animal
2.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 17(4): e13384, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39252203

ABSTRACT

Anastomotic leakage and subsequent pelvic sepsis are serious complications after surgery for pelvic malignancies, particularly challenging due to the large pelvic cavity dead space post-exenteration. We report a 47-year-old man treated for a severely infected pelvic hematoma and sepsis following anastomotic leakage after anterior pelvic exenteration. Post robot-assisted exenteration for locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a pelvic abscess from anastomotic dehiscence was identified. Initial CT-guided drainage and subsequent laparoscopic drainage were performed. On postoperative day 22, a bleeding left internal iliac pseudoaneurysm required embolization. Despite these efforts, the sepsis worsened due to an enlarged, infected hematoma. Endoscopic lavage, in collaboration with skilled endoscopists, successfully removed the hematoma, leading to an improved inflammatory response, and the patient was discharged. Endoscopic lavage proved to be the safest and most effective treatment for pelvic sepsis with an infected hematoma after various attempted interventions.


Subject(s)
Hematoma , Pelvic Exenteration , Sepsis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pelvic Exenteration/adverse effects , Hematoma/etiology , Hematoma/surgery , Sepsis/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Therapeutic Irrigation , Drainage , Postoperative Complications/etiology
3.
BJS Open ; 8(5)2024 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39230923

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery remains a significant complication despite advances in surgical techniques. Recent findings on serosal injury repair in coelomic cavities, such as the peritoneum, challenge the current understanding of the cellular origins and mechanisms underlying intestinal anastomotic healing. Understanding the contribution of each layer of the intestinal wall during anastomotic healing is needed to find new therapeutic strategies to prevent anastomotic leakage. The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the role of the serosal layer of the intestinal wall in anastomotic healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comprehensive histologic analysis of human and murine anastomoses was performed to elucidate histologic changes in the different intestinal layers during anastomotic healing. In vivo staining of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in the serosal layer was performed using a fluorophore-conjugated N-hydroxysuccinimide-ester before anastomosis surgery in a murine model. RESULTS: Histological examination of both human and murine anastomoses revealed that closure of the serosal layer occurred first during the healing process. In vivo serosal ECM staining demonstrated that a significant portion of the newly formed ECM within the anastomosis was indeed deposited onto the serosal layer. Furthermore, mesenchymal cells within the anastomotic scar were positive for mesothelial cell markers, podoplanin and Wilms tumour protein. CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental study, the results suggest that serosal scar formation is an important mechanism for anastomotic integrity in intestinal anastomoses. Mesothelial cells may significantly contribute to scar formation during anastomotic healing through epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, potentially suggesting a novel therapeutic target to prevent anastomotic leakage by enhancing physiological healing processes.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Anastomotic Leak , Serous Membrane , Wound Healing , Animals , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Humans , Mice , Wound Healing/physiology , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Serous Membrane/pathology , Male , Extracellular Matrix/metabolism , Female , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Colon/surgery , Colon/pathology
4.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 119, 2024 Sep 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39254913

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One of the approaches to distal sigmoid colon cancer surgical treatment is segmental colonic resection with vascular preservation of left colic artery (LCA). D3 lymph node dissection may technically vary according to different vascular anatomy. This study aims to show the approaches to D3 lymph node dissection with LCA preservation for distal sigmoid colon cancer according to different patterns of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) branching. METHODS: CT angiography with 3D reconstruction was routinely performed to identify the IMA branching pattern. Laparoscopic distal sigmoid colon resection with D3 lymph node dissection and left colic artery preservation in standardized fashion was performed in all cases. Data, including clinical, intraoperative, and short-term surgical outcomes, is presented as median numbers (Me) and interquartile range (IQR). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with distal sigmoid colon cancer were treated with laparoscopic distal sigmoid colon resection. The approach to D3 lymph node dissection varied according to different anatomical variations. There was one conversion (3.8%) and one anastomotic leakage (3.8%) in patients with high BMI. At the same time, there was a high apical lymph node count (Me 3 (IQR 2-5), min-max 0-10) due to the skeletonization of the IMA. CONCLUSIONS: The technical aspects of D3 lymph node dissection with left colic artery preservation may vary in different types of LCA and sigmoid artery branching patterns regardless of the standardized anatomical landmarks. The anatomical features should be considered when performing vascular-sparing lymph node dissection.


Subject(s)
Colon, Sigmoid , Laparoscopy , Lymph Node Excision , Mesenteric Artery, Inferior , Sigmoid Neoplasms , Humans , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Sigmoid Neoplasms/surgery , Mesenteric Artery, Inferior/surgery , Mesenteric Artery, Inferior/diagnostic imaging , Female , Male , Aged , Laparoscopy/methods , Middle Aged , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Colon, Sigmoid/blood supply , Colectomy/methods , Computed Tomography Angiography , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Colon/blood supply , Colon/surgery
5.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 127, 2024 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39289220

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Kono-S anastomosis has gained increasing interest although evaluation of its impact on reducing Crohn's recurrence shows conflicting results. This study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes for patients with Crohn's disease requiring surgery with Kono-S compared to conventional anastomosis. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis included patients with Crohn's disease treated with bowel resection and Kono-S anastomosis reconstruction versus a comparator arm of conventional anastomosis technique. Recurrence outcomes examined were endoscopic recurrence rates, mean postoperative Rutgeerts score, surgical recurrence, clinical recurrence, and postoperative biologics use. Short-term postoperative outcomes include anastomotic leaks, surgical site infection, postoperative ileus, and mean operative time. RESULTS: A total of 873 studies were identified with 15 remaining after abstract review encompassing 1501 patients, 765 with Kono-S and 736 with conventional anastomosis. Recurrence was significantly lower in the Kono-S arm, with endoscopic recurrence rates of 41% vs 48% (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73-1.00, p = 0.05) and surgical recurrence rates of 2.7% vs 21.0% (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.06-0.30, p < 0.001). There was a significantly lower anastomotic leak rate in the Kono-S arm when compared to conventional anastomosis, 1.7% vs 4.9% (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.74, p = 0.005). Mean operative time was similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Kono-S is a safe and feasible anastomotic technique with lower rates of endoscopic and surgical postoperative recurrence. While we await further trials to substantiate this benefit, Kono-S anastomosis should be considered as an important tool in the armamentarium of a surgeon in anastomotic construction to reduce recurrence.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Crohn Disease , Recurrence , Humans , Crohn Disease/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Female , Adult , Male , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Operative Time , Secondary Prevention/statistics & numerical data , Secondary Prevention/methods , Middle Aged , Colon/surgery
6.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 260, 2024 Sep 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39272015

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is currently one of the high-risk malignant tumors worldwide, posing a serious threat to human health. This study aimed to analyse the causes of postoperative mortality and intrathoracic anastomotic leakage(IAL) after esophagectomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 172 patients with esophageal cancer resection and focused on the preoperative and postoperative indicators. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors affected IAL and evaluated the potential factors on postoperative mortality. The Kaplan-Meier curve was applied to evaluate the effect of leakage on postoperative mortality after propensity score matching. RESULTS: Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that infection and high BMI were significant risk factors for IAL, patients with BMI over 24 kg/m2 in IAL group was two times higher than that of the group without IAL (95% CI = 1.01-6.38; P = 0.048). When patients were infected, the hazard ratios(HRs) of anastomotic leakage was twice that of patients without infection (95% CI = 1.22-4.70; P = 0.011). On the other hand, IAL was a significant cause of postoperative mortality, the 40-day postoperative mortality rate in the leakage group was significantly higher than the non leakage group (28.95% in leakage group vs. 7.46% in non leakage group, P<0.01). After propensity score matching, IAL still significantly affected postoperative mortality. The total length of hospital stay of the leakage group was inevitably longer than that of the non leakage group (22.19 ± 10.79 vs. 15.27 ± 8.59). CONCLUSION: IAL was a significant cause of death in patients underwent esophageal cancer resection. Patients with high BMI over 24 kg/m2 and infection may be more prone to developing IAL after esophagectomy. IAL inevitably prolonged the length of hospital stay and increased postoperative mortality.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagectomy , Humans , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Female , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Aged , Propensity Score , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality
7.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 34(4): 655-669, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39277297

ABSTRACT

Bariatric surgery is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with obesity and obesity-related comorbidities, with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy being the two most common procedures. Despite the success of these interventions, adverse events are not uncommon. Endoscopic management has become first-line therapy when complications occur, and the armamentarium of devices and techniques continues to grow. This article focuses on the management of fistulas, leaks, and ulcers and also focuses on the etiology and endoscopic management strategy of each complication.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak , Bariatric Surgery , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Gastric Fistula/etiology , Gastric Fistula/surgery , Ulcer/etiology , Ulcer/surgery , Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , Gastric Bypass/methods
8.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 152, 2024 Sep 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39331160

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leak (AL) remains the most important complication after left-sided colic anastomoses and technical complications during anastomotic construction are responsible of higher leakage incidence. Powered circular stapler (PCS) in colorectal surgery has been introduced in order to reduce technical errors and post-operative complications due to the manual circular stapler (MCS). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. An electronic systematic search was performed using Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase of studies comparing PCS and MCS. The incidence of AL, anastomotic bleeding (AB), conversion, and reoperation were assessed. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024512644. RESULTS: Five observational studies were eligible for inclusion reporting on 2379 patients. The estimated pooled Risk Ratios for AL and AB rates following PCS were significantly lower than those observed with MCS (0.44 and 0.23, respectively; both with p < 0.01). Conversion and reoperation rate did not show any significant difference: 0.41 (95% CI 0.09-1.88; p = 0.25) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.33-1.84; p = 0.57); respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of PCS demonstrates a lower incidence of AL and AB compared to MCS but does not exhibit a discernible influence on reintervention or conversion rates. The call for future randomized clinical trials aims to definitively clarify these issues and contribute to further advancements in refining surgical strategies for left-sided colonic resection.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Anastomotic Leak , Colon , Surgical Staplers , Humans , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Colon/surgery , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Rectum/surgery , Reoperation , Surgical Stapling/adverse effects , Publication Bias
10.
J Evid Based Med ; 17(3): 559-574, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39161209

ABSTRACT

AIM: Conflicting results have been reported about the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy. We aimed to unravel the potential effect of neoadjuvant therapy on AL after esophagectomy through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed by retrieving relevant literature from PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies (RS) comparing the following treatment modalities were included: neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), neoadjuvant radiotherapy (nR), neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT), and surgery alone (SA). Subgroup analyses by radiation dose, examined lymph nodes (ELN), route of reconstruction, site of anastomosis, and surgical approach were also conducted. RESULTS: A total of 62 studies with 12,746 patients were included for the present study, among which 17 were RCTs. There were no significantly statistical differences observed among the five treatment modalities in AL for both RCTs (nCRT-nICT: risk ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 0.52-4.4; nCT-nICT: 1.71, 0.56-5.08; nICT-nR: 0.79, 0.12-8.02; nICT-SA: 0.59, 0.2-1.84) and RS (nCRT-nICT: odds ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 0.84-2.84; nCT-nICT: 1.56, 0.87-2.88; nICT-SA: 0.6, 0.31-1.12; nICT-nR: 1.08, 0.09-36.02). Subgroup analysis revealed that no significant difference in AL was observed among the five treatment modalities except for the impact of nCRT versus nCT (0.21, 0.05-0.73) on AL with a radiation dose ≥41.4 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant therapy do not significantly increase the incidence of AL after esophagectomy. Administration of irradiation with a moderate dose is not associated with elevated risk in AL. Clinicians can be less apprehensive about prescribing nCRT.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagectomy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Network Meta-Analysis , Bayes Theorem
11.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 95, 2024 Aug 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39103661

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most frequent life-threating complication following colorectal surgery. Several attempts have been made to prevent AL. This prospective, randomized, multicentre trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nebulised modified cyanoacrylate in preventing AL after rectal surgery. METHODS: Patients submitted to colorectal surgery for carcinoma of the high-medium rectum across five high-volume centres between June 2021 and January 2023 entered the study and were randomized into group A (anastomotic reinforcement with cyanoacrylate) and group B (no reinforcement) and followed up for 30 days. Anastomotic reinforcement was performed via nebulisation of 1 mL of a modified cyanoacrylate glue. Preoperative features and intraoperative and postoperative results were recorded and compared. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID number NCT03941938). RESULTS: Out of 152 patients, 133 (control group, n = 72; cyanoacrylate group, n = 61) completed the follow-up. ALs were detected in nine patients (12.5%) in the control group (four grade B and five grade C) and in four patients (6.6%), in the cyanoacrylate group (three grade B and one grade C); however, despite this trend, the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.36). However, Clavien-Dindo complications grade > 2 were significantly higher in the control group (12.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.04). No adverse effects related to the glue application were reported. CONCLUSION: The role of modified cyanoacrylate application in AL prevention remains unclear. However its use to seal colorectal anastomoses is safe and could help to reduce severe postoperative complications.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Anastomotic Leak , Cyanoacrylates , Rectum , Humans , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Female , Male , Prospective Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Cyanoacrylates/administration & dosage , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Rectum/surgery , Tissue Adhesives/therapeutic use , Suture Techniques , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome
12.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(8)2024 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39142848

ABSTRACT

Late perforation of the ileum is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication following intestinal resection. We present a unique case of a woman in her 60s with a history of appendiceal carcinoid tumour, who underwent a right hemicolectomy. Positron emission tomography and surveillance CTs showed normal surgical changes and no recurrent malignancy. Three years postoperatively, she presented with severe abdominal pain. CT revealed a perforation along the ileal wall of the ileocolonic anastomosis. She underwent emergent resection and repeat ileocolonic anastomosis. We conclude that the patient had subclinical ischaemia of the anastomosis, which eventually progressed to perforation 3 years later. We discuss a literature review on late small intestinal anastomotic perforations and their associated risk factors. Our case and literature review emphasise the importance of considering delayed anastomotic leak in postoperative patients with a history of intestinal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, Roux-en-Y enteroenterostomy or side-to-side anastomosis.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Ileum , Intestinal Perforation , Humans , Female , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Intestinal Perforation/diagnostic imaging , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Ileum/surgery , Colectomy/adverse effects , Carcinoid Tumor/surgery , Appendiceal Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Abdominal Pain/etiology
13.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 249, 2024 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39136791

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Leaks after sleeve gastrectomy remain a deadly complication significantly affecting outcomes and medical costs. The aim of the present review is to provide an updated decalogue on leak prevention. METHODS: Risk factors of leakage after LSG were examined based on an extensive review of literature (in period time 2016-2024) and summary of evidence was provided using Oxford levels of evidence scale. RESULTS: Pathogenesis of leakage after LSG still remain related to ischemic and mechanical factors and, therefore, no new evidence has been reported. Conversely, some technical aspect of the procedure has changed: bougie size, antrum resection, staple line reinforcement, and intraoperative leak testing. CONCLUSIONS: Bougie size 36 F is effective and safe achieving similar leakage rate compared to larger bougie sizes (EL:2) 2024 UPDATE; There is no significant difference in the leak rate between restrictive (< 6 cm) and conservative (6 cm) antrum resection (EL: 1) 2024 UPDATE; Surgical experience and case volume affect the leak rate more consistently than every kind of SLR (EL: 2) 2024 UPDATE; Intraoperative leak test after LSG represents a decision based on surgeon preference in absence of standardization (endoscopy, bubble test, methylene blue, indocyanine green.) and strong detection/prevention rate (EL: 3) 2024 UPDATE.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak , Gastrectomy , Laparoscopy , Humans , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastrectomy/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Risk Factors , Obesity, Morbid/surgery
14.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 325, 2024 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39167152

ABSTRACT

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision is the main surgical approach for treating rectal cancer, but there is still no clear consensus on the issue of low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during the procedure. Robotic surgery has been shown to have certain advantages over laparoscopic surgery in multiple studies, but further research is needed to better understand the outcomes of robotic surgery in the context of low ligation procedures. In this study, we included 1590 patients with mid-low rectal cancer. Among them, 942 patients underwent low ligation surgery (LL), divided into 138 in the robotic group and 804 in the laparoscopic group. The high ligation surgery (HL) group consisted of 648 patients. The results of LL vs HL showed that the LL group had faster bowel movement recovery (P = 0.003), lower anastomotic leak rate (P = 0.032), and lower International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.001). The results of Rob-LL vs Lap-LL showed that the Rob-LL group had longer operative time (P < 0.001), less blood loss (P = 0.001), more lymph nodes retrieved (P = 0.045), and lower Wexner score at 2 weeks postoperatively (P = 0.029). The concept of low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery is a promising surgical approach that can accelerate the patient's functional recovery. When combined with robotic technology, it may offer more benefits than laparoscopic techniques.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Mesenteric Artery, Inferior , Rectal Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Mesenteric Artery, Inferior/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Ligation/methods , Male , Female , Laparoscopy/methods , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Blood Loss, Surgical/statistics & numerical data
16.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 1029, 2024 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39164624

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To compare the difference of postoperative anastomotic leakage (AL) rate between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) with pembrolizumab and NCRT group, and investigate the risk factors of developing AL for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The GF was contoured on the pretreatment planning computed tomography and dosimetric parameters were retrospectively calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent risk predictors for the entire cohort. A nomogram risk prediction model for postoperative AL was established. RESULTS: A total of 160 ESCC patients were included for analysis. Of them, 112 were treated with NCRT with pembrolizumab and 44 patients with NCRT. Seventeen (10.6%) patients experienced postoperative AL with a rate of 10.7% (12/112) in NCRT with pembrolizumab and 11.4% (5/44) in NCRT group. For the entire cohort, mean, D50, Dmax, V5, V10 and V20 GF dose were statistically higher in those with AL (all p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that tumor length (p = 0.012), volume of GF (p = 0.003) and mean dose of GF (p = 0.007) were independently predictors for postoperative AL. Using receiver operating characteristics analysis, the mean dose limit on the GF was defined as 14 Gy. CONCLUSION: Based on our prospective database, no significant difference of developing AL were observed between NCRT with pembrolizumab and NCRT group. We established an individualized nomograms based on mean GF dose combined with clinical indicators to predict AL in the early postoperative period.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Male , Female , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Prospective Studies , Aged , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Nomograms , Risk Factors , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
17.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 126, 2024 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39105987

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic stenosis (AS) is a common complication after colorectal resection. However, the predisposing factors for stricture formation are not fully understood. Previous studies have shown anastomotic leakage (AL) to be a risk factor for the occurrence of AS. Therefore, we aim to investigate the impact of anastomotic leakage characteristics on the occurrence of anastomotic stenosis after colorectal resection. METHODS: Consecutive patients with AL following elective, sphincter preserving, colorectal resection, with or without diversion ostomy, between January 2009 and March 2023 were identified from a prospectively collected database. The characteristics of the anastomotic leakage, patient baseline and operative characteristics as well as the postoperative outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with the occurrence of post-leakage AS. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients developed AL and met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 28 (21.7%) patients were diagnosed with post-leakage AS. There was a significantly higher frequency of patients with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (18% vs 3%; p = .026) and hand-sewn anastomoses (39% vs 17%; p = .011) within the AS group. Furthermore, the extent of the anastomotic defect was significantly higher in the AS group compared with the non-AS group (50%, IQR 27-71 vs. 20%, IQR 9-40, p = 0.011). Similar findings were observed between the study groups regarding age, sex, BMI, ASA score, medical comorbidities, diagnosis, surgical procedure, surgical approach (open vs. minimally invasive), and anastomotic fashioning (side-to-end vs. end-to-end). On multivariate analysis, the extent of the anastomotic defect (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.03; p = 0.034) and hand-sewn anastomoses (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.01-6.98; p = 0.043) were confirmed as independent risk factors for post-leakage AS. No correlation could be observed between the occurrence of post-leakage AS and the ISREC grading of AL, the anastomotic height or the management of AL. Time to ostomy reversal was significantly longer in the AS group (202d, IQR 169-275 vs. 318d IQR 192-416, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The extent of the anastomotic defect and hand-sewn anastomoses were confirmed as independent risk factors for the occurrence of post-leakage AS. No correlation could be observed between the ISREC grading of AL, the anastomotic height or AL management, and the occurrence of post-leakage AS.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Anastomotic Leak , Humans , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Constriction, Pathologic/etiology , Aged , Risk Factors , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery
18.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 34(8): 682-690, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39110618

ABSTRACT

Background: Celiac axis stenosis can potentially lead to insufficient blood supply to vital organs, such as the liver, spleen, pancreas, and stomach. This condition result in the development of collateral circulation between the superior mesenteric artery and the hepatic artery. However, these collateral circulations are often disrupted during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), which may increase the risk of postoperative complications. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) from April 2015 to April 2023. Celiac trunk stenosis is classified according to the degree of stenosis: no stenosis (<30%), grade A (30%-<50%), grade B (50%-≤80%), and grade C (>80%). The incidence of postoperative complications was evaluated, and both univariate and multivariate risk analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 997 patients were included in the study, with mild celiac axis stenosis present in 23 (2.3%) patients, moderate stenosis in 18 (1.8%) patients, and severe stenosis in 10 (1.0%) patients. Independent risk factors for the development of bile leakage, as identified by both univariate and multivariate analyses, included body mass index (BMI) (HR = 1.108, 95% CI = 1.008-1.218, P = .033), intra-abdominal infection (HR = 2.607, 95% CI = 1.308-5.196, P = .006), postoperative hemorrhage (HR = 4.510, 95% CI = 2.048-9.930, P = <0.001), and celiac axis stenosis (50%-≤80%, HR = 4.235, 95% CI = 1.153-15.558, P = .030), and (>80%, HR = 4.728, 95% CI = .882-25.341, P = .047). Celiac axis stenosis, however, was not determined to be an independent risk factor for pancreatic fistula (P > 0.05). Additionally, the presence of an aberrant hepatic artery did not significantly increase the risk of postoperative complications when compared with celiac axis stenosis alone. Conclusion: Severe celiac axis stenosis is an independent risk factor for postoperative bile leakage following LPD.


Subject(s)
Celiac Artery , Laparoscopy , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Aged , Constriction, Pathologic/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adult , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Bile
19.
Ann Ital Chir ; 95(4): 678-689, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39186364

ABSTRACT

AIM: In terms of early-term mortality, there may be variability in terms of factors belonging to age groups. While some risk factors apply to all patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery, some factors may come to the fore in terms of age. There have been very few studies on factors that increase the risk of early-term mortality, especially for geriatric patients. It was aimed to compare factors influencing prognosis and mortality within the first 30 postoperative days between geriatric patients and those <65 years of age, and to identify factors that increase the risk of anastomotic leakage and early-term mortality, particularly in geriatric patients. METHODS: Clinical, laboratory, and pathology findings from 341 patients (186 geriatric) who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer between January 2016 and December 2019 were collected and analyzed. In terms of categorical variables, comparisons between groups were made with Pearson's Chi Square test and Fisher's Exact Test. Risk coefficients of variables in terms of anastomotic leakage and early-term mortality were determined by logistic regression analysis. The results were evaluated within the 95% Confidence interval, and p < 0.05 values were considered significant. RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage was detected in 7% of patients, and 6.2% of the patients died within the first 30 postoperative days. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was significantly higher in geriatric patients with hypertension (p = 0.003), those undergoing emergency surgery (p = 0.007), those with stage 4 tumors (p < 0.001), those with ostomy-related complications (p = 0.042), those who developed intraabdominal abscess or peritonitis (p < 0.001), those with respiratory failure (p = 0.009), and those with perforation (p = 0.001). In patients <65 years of age, groups stratified by these variables did not differ significantly in terms of early-term mortality rate (p > 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that lack of bowel preparation and development of intraabdominal abscess/peritonitis significantly increase early-term mortality rates in both <65 and geriatric patients. Additionally, hypertension, emergency surgery, advanced tumor stage, development of ostomy-related complications, respiratory failure, and perforation significantly increase early-term mortality solely in geriatric patients.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Anastomotic Leak/mortality , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Female , Risk Factors , Middle Aged , Age Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prognosis , Hypertension/complications , Peritonitis/mortality , Peritonitis/etiology , Abdominal Abscess/etiology , Abdominal Abscess/mortality
20.
Int J Surg Oncol ; 2024: 5562420, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39157264

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Failure of low colorectal anastomosis remains challenging in surgical oncology, necessitating the exploration of new methods and improvements in existing preventive measures. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted in two stages: intraluminal pressure in the colon was monitored in 32 patients by manometry and sonography over a 5-day postoperative period; 213 patients who underwent anterior resection of the rectum were analyzed, of whom 126 and 87 underwent diverting stoma (DS) and transanal intubation (TAI), respectively. Results: The effectiveness of the recommended technique for applying and removing transanal intubation (TAI) to prevent pneumo hydro strike (≥15 kPa) on the anastomosis line was analyzed in 87 patients and compared with imposed DS. TAI showed better borderline statistical significance (p = 0.051). The incidence of repeat surgery for anastomotic failure (AL) was seven (5.55%) and four (4.59%) in the DS and TAI groups, respectively. The distance of the anastomosis from the dentate line <60 mm was associated with a higher risk of AL occurrence (odds ratio (OR), 1.012; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.007-1.017; p < 0.001; area under the curve (AUC) = 0.82). DS is recommended for men, as the risk of AL is significantly lower among women (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.16-1.04; p = 0.062; AUC, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.54-0.67). Conclusions: Although TAI is advantageous over DS for preventing AL, surgeons select the method for the preventive approach based on the preoperative and intraoperative results.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Rectum , Humans , Male , Female , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Aged , Rectum/surgery , Anal Canal/surgery , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Colon/surgery , Adult , Manometry , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Reoperation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL