Spevigo® (Spesolimab-Sbzo) Injection for the Treatment of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis.

Spevigo® (spesolimab-sbzo) injection was recently approved for the treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) in adults aged 18- 75 years. Spesolimab, a monoclonal antibody, binds to the interleukin-36 (IL-36) receptor and prevents its activation by IL-36 cytokines, leading to reduced inflammation, skin lesions, and flares. In a randomized placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (Effisayil-1, NCT03782792), 53 patients were randomized to spesolimab (n = 35) and placebo (n = 18) to evaluate the effect of a one-time 900-mg dose of spesolimab versus placebo against GPP flares. The primary endpoint was Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) pustulation subscore of 0 (no visible pustules) and the key secondary endpoint was the GPPGA total score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear skin) at the end of week 1. The primary endpoint was achieved by 54% (19/35) of patients in the spesolimab group and 6% (1/18) of patients in the placebo group. The key secondary endpoint was achieved by 43% (15/35) of patients in the spesolimab group and 11% (2/18) of patients in the placebo group. In the first week, adverse events (mild to severe) were reported in 66% (22/35) of patients in the spesolimab group and 56% (10/18) in the placebo group.

Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous iscalimab (CFZ533) in two distinct populations of patients with Sjögren's disease (TWINSS): week 24 results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b dose-ranging study.

BACKGROUND: Sjögren's disease is a chronic autoimmune disease with an unmet need for targeted therapies. The aim of the TWINSS study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of iscalimab, a monoclonal antibody against CD40, in patients with active Sjögren's disease. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study, conducted at 71 sites in 23 countries, enrolled patients aged 18 years or older fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) 2016 criteria. In the dose-ranging cohort 1, patients with a EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) score of 5 or higher and a EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) score of 5 or higher were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to subcutaneous iscalimab 150 mg, 300 mg, 600 mg, or placebo. In the proof-of-concept cohort 2, patients with an ESSDAI score of less than 5, ESSPRI (dryness or fatigue) score of 5 or higher, and Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life score of 30 or higher were randomly assigned (1:1) to iscalimab 600 mg or placebo. The sponsor, investigator, site personnel, and patients were masked to the treatment assignment. The primary objectives were to demonstrate a dose-response relationship of iscalimab based on the change in ESSDAI from baseline to week 24 in cohort 1 by Multiple Comparison Procedure-Modelling (MCP-Mod), and to assess the effect of iscalimab 600 mg on ESSPRI at week 24 in cohort 2. All the efficacy analyses included all patients who were randomly assigned, and safety analysis included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03905525), and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Oct 1, 2019, and Feb 28, 2022, 460 patients were screened; 173 patients were assigned to cohort 1 (44 to iscalimab 150 mg, 43 to 300 mg, 43 to 600 mg, and 43 to placebo) and 100 to cohort 2 (50 to each group). In cohort 1, the MCP step showed a significant dose-response relationship for placebo-adjusted ESSDAI change from baseline in one of four models (Linlog model, one-sided p=0·0041). ESSDAI decreased from baseline to week 24 with all three doses of iscalimab; 150 mg and 600 mg doses showed statistically significant improvement (placebo-adjusted least squares [LS] mean difference -3·0 [95% CI -4·9 to -1·1]; p=0·0025 for 150 mg and -2·9 [-4·9 to -1·0]; p=0·0037 for 600 mg). In cohort 2, ESSPRI showed a trend towards improvement with iscalimab 600 mg (placebo-adjusted LS mean change from baseline -0·57 points [95% CI -1·30 to 0·15]; p=0·12). Serious adverse events were reported in nine patients in cohort 1 (one [2%] of 43 in the placebo group, one [2%] of 44 in the iscalimab 150 mg group, three [7%] of 42 in the 300 mg group, four [9%] of 44 in the 600 mg group) and four patients in cohort 2 (two [4%] of 50 in each group). No deaths occurred over the 24-week period. INTERPRETATION: The study met the primary objective of demonstrating a significant dose-response relationship with iscalimab in terms of disease activity at week 24. Iscalimab was well tolerated and showed initial clinical benefit over placebo in two distinct populations of patients with Sjögren's disease, to be confirmed in larger trials. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma.

Fremanezumab-associated injection site alopecia.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors, in the form of injectable monoclonal antibodies, are a newer class of drugs for the prevention of migraine headaches. In clinical trials, they have been found to be effective with good tolerance and few adverse effects. Alopecia has been increasingly noted as a post-marketing event associated with CGRP inhibitor injectables. Of the case reports available on this topic, alopecia has commonly been localised to the scalp and associated with erenumab use; however, not as much has been reported for fremanezumab nor for injection site-related alopecia. We report an occurrence of persistent lower extremity localised injection site alopecia in a patient within our headache clinic who used fremanezumab. The possible mechanism of alopecia may be related to the failure of hair follicle immune privilege in the absence of CGRP immunomodulatory effects.

Characteristics of the first immunocompromised patients to receive sipavibart as an early access treatment for COVID-19 pre-exposure prophylaxis in France.

France was the first country to grant Sipavibart (AZD3152, an investigational long-acting monoclonal antibody) as a COVID-19 pre-exposure prophylaxis treatment in immunocompromised individuals in December 2023. The first patients to receive Sipavibart had different profiles, but they were all highly immunocompromised with frequently associated hypogammaglobulinemia and other chronic conditions. No adverse event was reported.

Study protocol for the ROLEX-DUO randomised placebo-controlled trial: ROmosozumab Loaded with EXercise - DUal effects on bone and muscle in postmenopausal Osteoporosis and Osteopenia.

INTRODUCTION: Novel strategies are needed to address the rising burden of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. High-intensity resistance and impact (HiRIT) exercise has shown benefit in improving bone density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis/osteopenia. Whether HiRIT can enhance the therapeutic effects of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy has not been established. ROLEX-DUO is a randomised controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy of romosozumab on various bone and muscle outcomes in combination with different exercise interventions in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis/osteopenia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ROLEX-DUO is an 8-month randomised placebo-controlled trial conducted at two tertiary referral centres for patients with osteoporosis/osteopenia in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. The study is implementing the combination of romosozumab or placebo with different forms of exercise in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis/osteopenia without recent fragility fracture (n=102). Eligible women will be randomised 1:1:1 into one of three groups: (1) romosozumab with supervised HiRIT, (2) romosozumab with unsupervised low-intensity exercise or (3) placebo with unsupervised low-intensity exercise. Co-primary outcomes are the mean percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), and mean change in five times sit-to-stand test performance (seconds) at 8 months. Secondary/exploratory outcomes include BMD changes at the femoral neck, total hip and distal radius, three-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) hip outcomes, DXA-derived lean and fat mass, serum markers of bone turnover (procollagen type 1 peptide, C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen) and bone biomarkers (dickkopf-1), serum extracellular vesicle analyses, 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) quality-of-life scores, Menopause-Specific Quality Of Life (MENQOL) Questionnaire menopause symptom burden scores, number of falls and fractures. Mixed-effects models will be performed to compare longitudinal outcome results between groups using intention-to-treat analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/ETH01794, protocol V.8, dated 03 July 2024). Participants will provide written informed consent prior to inclusion. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences and summary reports to funding bodies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12623000867695.

Improvement of self-administration experience with a new injection device: Real-life experience with risankizumab in patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Trypanophobia or "needle phobia" represents a potential hindrance to the effective management of chronic diseases whenever an injectable therapy might be required, especially in case of frequent administrations. Psoriasis, a chronic dermatologic disease, can be effectively treated with biologic drugs administered subcutaneously. Thankfully, anti-IL-23 drugs require few administrations per year and are available in prefilled pens that hide the needle, thus representing a convenient option in patients with trypanophobia. METHODS: An observational multicentric study was conducted on patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who were treated with 75 mg × 2 risankizumab prefilled syringe therapy for more than 6 months and reported a loss of efficacy measured by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) from PASI 90 to PASI 75 attributed to a reduction of adherence due to trypanophobia. The patients were switched to 1 prefilled pen of risankizumab 150 mg and asked to fill out the Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ) before and after the injection at week 0 and at the following administration after 12 weeks. Subjects scored each item of the SIAQ on a 5-point scale, scores were later transformed from 0 (worst experience) to 10 (best experience). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled. The mean SIAQ predose domain scores were 5.5 for feelings about injection, 6.2 for self-confidence, and 6.4 for satisfaction with self-injection. After dose scores were higher (> 8.5) for each of the six domains at Week 0 and even higher after 12 weeks (> 9.0). CONCLUSIONS: User-friendly devices, such as prefilled pens, and a lower number of injections improved patient satisfaction in a group of patients with psoriasis on treatment with biologic drugs. We believe that treatment adherence could be positively influenced by such changes in the way of administration of a biologic treatment.

Administration of an antibody against apoptosis inhibitor of macrophage prevents aortic aneurysm progression in mice.

Apoptosis inhibitor of macrophage (AIM) is known to induce apoptosis resistance in macrophages and to exacerbate chronic inflammation, leading to arteriosclerosis. The role of AIM in aortic aneurysm (AA) remains unknown. This study examined the effects of an anti-AIM antibody in preventing AA formation and progression. In apolipoprotein E-deficient mice, AA was induced by subcutaneous angiotensin II infusion. Mice were randomly divided into two groups: (i) AIM group; weekly anti-murine AIM monoclonal antibody injection (n = 10), and (ii) IgG group; anti-murine IgG antibody injection as control (n = 14). The AIM group, compared with the IgG group, exhibited reduced AA enlargement (aortic diameter at 4 weeks: 2.1 vs. 2.7 mm, respectively, p = 0.012); decreased loss of elastic lamellae construction; reduced expression levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1; decreased numbers of AIM-positive cells and inflammatory M1 macrophages (AIM: 1.4 vs. 8.0%, respectively, p = 0.004; M1 macrophages: 24.5 vs. 55.7%, respectively, p = 0.017); and higher expression of caspase-3 in the aortic wall (22.8 vs. 10.5%, respectively, p = 0.019). Our results suggest that administration of an anti-AIM antibody mitigated AA progression by alleviating inflammation and promoting M1 macrophage apoptosis.

Monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukins for systemic lupus erythematosus: updates in early clinical drug development.

INTRODUCTION: The advent of biological therapies has already revolutionized treatment strategies and disease course of several rheumatologic conditions, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting cytokines and interleukins represent a considerable portion of this family of drugs. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) dysregulation of different cytokine and interleukin-related pathways have been linked to disease development and perpetration, offering palatable therapeutic targets addressable via such mAbs. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we provide an overview of the different biological therapies under development targeting cytokines and interleukins, with a focus on mAbs, while providing the rationale behind their choice as therapeutic targets and analyzing the scientific evidence linking them to SLE pathogenesis. EXPERT OPINION: An unprecedented number of clinical trials on biological drugs targeting different immunological pathways are ongoing in SLE. Their success might allow us to tackle present challenges of SLE management, including the overuse of glucocorticoids in daily clinical practice, as well as SLE heterogenicity in treatment response among different individuals, hopefully paving the way toward precision medicine.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous administration of broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies (bNAbs), given to HIV-1 exposed, uninfected neonates and infants: study protocol for a phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: The ambitious goal to eliminate new pediatric HIV infections by 2030 requires accelerated prevention strategies in high-risk settings such as South Africa. One approach could be pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies (bNAbs). The aim of our study is to define the optimal dose(s), the ideal combination(s) of bNAbs in terms of potency and breadth, and timing of subcutaneous (SC) administration(s) to prevent breast milk transmission of HIV. METHODS: Two bNAbs, CAP256V2LS and VRC07-523LS, will be assessed in a sequential and randomized phase I, single-site, single-blind, dose-finding trial. We aim to investigate the 28-day safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of incrementally higher doses of these bNAbs in breastfeeding HIV-1 exposed born without HIV neonates alongside standard of care antiretroviral (ARV) medication to prevent (infants) or treat (mothers) HIV infection. The trial design includes 3 steps and 7 arms (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 6b) with 8 infants in each arm. The first step will evaluate the safety and PK profile of the bNAbs when given alone as a single subcutaneous (SC) administration at increasing mg/kg body weight doses within 96 h of birth: arms 1, 2 and 3 at doses of 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg of CAP256V2LS, respectively; arms 4 and 5 at doses of 20 and 30 mg/kg of VRC07-523LS, respectively. Step two will evaluate the safety and PK profile of a combination of the two bNAbs administered SC at fixed doses within 96 h of birth. Step three will evaluate the safety and PK profile of the two bNAbs administered SC in combination at fixed doses, after 3 months. Arms 1 and 6 will follow sequential recruitment, whereas randomization will occur sequentially between arms (a) 2 & 4 and (b) 3 & 5. Before each randomization, a safety pause will allow review of safety data of the preceding arms. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will guide further studies on bNAbs to prevent breast milk transmission of HIV. PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 4.0 dated 15 March 2024. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR): PACTR202205715278722, 21 April 2022; South African National Clinical Trial Registry (SANCTR): DOH-27-062022-6058.

Imaging with [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 anti-DLL3 antibody in patients with high-grade neuroendocrine tumours of the lung and prostate: a phase 1/2, first-in-human trial.

BACKGROUND: Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is aberrantly expressed on the surface of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells. We assessed the safety and feasibility of the DLL3-targeted imaging tracer [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 (composed of the anti-DLL3 antibody SC16.56 conjugated to p-SCN-Bn-deferoxamine [DFO] serving as a chelator for zirconium-89) in patients with neuroendocrine-derived cancer. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, first-in-human study of immunoPET-CT imaging with [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56. The study was done at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Patients aged 18 years or older with a histologically verified neuroendocrine-derived malignancy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were eligible. An initial cohort of patients with SCLC (cohort 1) received 37-74 MBq [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 as a single intravenous infusion at a total mass dose of 2·5 mg and had serial PET-CT scans at 1 h, day 1, day 3, and day 7 post-injection. The primary outcomes of phase 1 of the study (cohort 1) were to estimate terminal clearance half-time, determine whole organ time-integrated activity coefficients, and assess the safety of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56. An expansion cohort of additional patients (with SCLC, neuroendocrine prostate cancer, atypical carcinoid tumours, and non-small-cell lung cancer; cohort 2) received a single infusion of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 at the same activity and mass dose as in the initial cohort followed by a single PET-CT scan 3-6 days later. Retrospectively collected tumour biopsy samples were assessed for DLL3 by immunohistochemistry. The primary outcome of phase 2 of the study in cohort 2 was to determine the potential association between tumour uptake of the tracer and intratumoural DLL3 protein expression, as determined by immunohistochemistry. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04199741. FINDINGS: Between Feb 11, 2020, and Jan 30, 2023, 12 (67%) men and six (33%) women were enrolled, with a median age of 64 years (range 23-81). Cohort 1 included three patients and cohort 2 included 15 additional patients. Imaging of the three patients with SCLC in cohort 1 showed strong tumour-specific uptake of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 at day 3 and day 7 post-injection. Serum clearance was biphasic with an estimated terminal clearance half-time of 119 h (SD 31). The highest mean absorbed dose was observed in the liver (1·83 mGy/MBq [SD 0·36]), and the mean effective dose was 0·49 mSv/MBq (SD 0·10). In cohort 2, a single immunoPET-CT scan on day 3-6 post-administration could delineate DLL3-avid tumours in 12 (80%) of 15 patients. Tumoural uptake varied between and within patients, and across anatomical sites, with a wide range in maximum standardised uptake value (from 3·3 to 66·7). Tumour uptake by [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 was congruent with DLL3 immunohistochemistry in 15 (94%) of 16 patients with evaluable tissue. Two patients with non-avid DLL3 SCLC and neuroendocrine prostate cancer by PET scan showed the lowest DLL3 expression by tumour immunohistochemistry. One (6%) of 18 patients had a grade 1 allergic reaction; no grade 2 or worse adverse events were noted in either cohort. INTERPRETATION: DLL3 PET-CT imaging of patients with neuroendocrine cancers is safe and feasible. These results show the potential utility of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 for non-invasive in-vivo detection of DLL3-expressing malignancies. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health, Prostate Cancer Foundation, and Scannell Foundation.

Development of monoclonal antibodies in tablet form: A new approach for local delivery.

Among the various pharmaceutical forms, tablets offer numerous advantages, like ease of administration, cost-effectiveness in production, and better stability of biomolecules. Beyond these benefits, the tablet form opens up possibilities for alternative routes for the local delivery of biopharmaceuticals such as oral or vaginal administration, thereby expanding the therapeutic applications of these biomolecules and overcoming the inconvenients associated with parenteral administration. However, to date there is limited information on the feasibility of developing biomolecules in the tablet form. In this study, we have evaluated the feasibility of developing monoclonal antibodies in the tablet form while preserving their biological properties. Different excipients and process parameters were studied to assess their impact on the antibody's integrity during tableting. ELISA results show that applying compression pressure up to 100 MPa is not detrimental to the antibody's binding properties when formulated from a lyophilized powder containing trehalose or sucrose as the major excipient. This observation was confirmed with SPR and ultracentrifugation experiments, which demonstrated that neither the binding affinity for both Fc and Fab antibody fragments nor its aggregation rate are affected by the tableting process. After compression, the tablets containing the antibodies have been shown to be stable for 6 months at room temperature.

A multi-scale numerical study of monoclonal antibodies uptake by initial lymphatics after subcutaneous injection.

This paper studies the transport of monoclonal antibodies through skin tissue and initial lymphatics, which impacts the pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies. Our model integrates a macroscale representation of the entire skin tissue with a mesoscale model that focuses on the papillary dermis layer. Our results indicate that it takes hours for the drugs to disperse from the injection site to the papillary dermis before entering the initial lymphatics. Additionally, we observe an inhomogeneous drug distribution in the interstitial space of the papillary dermis, with higher drug concentrations near initial lymphatics and lower concentrations near blood capillaries. To validate our model, we compare our numerical simulation results with experimental data, finding a good alignment. Our parametric studies on the drug molecule properties and injection parameters suggest that a higher diffusion coefficient increases the transport and uptake rate while binding slows down these processes. Furthermore, shallower injection depths lead to faster lymphatic uptake, whereas the size of the injection plume has a minor effect on the uptake rate. These findings advance our understanding of drug transport and lymphatic absorption after subcutaneous injection, offering valuable insights for optimizing drug delivery strategies and the design of biotherapeutics.

Tisotumab Vedotin as Second- or Third-Line Therapy for Recurrent Cervical Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent cervical cancer is a life-threatening disease, with limited treatment options available when disease progression occurs after first-line combination therapy. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, multinational, open-label trial of tisotumab vedotin as second- or third-line therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive tisotumab vedotin monotherapy (2.0 mg per kilogram of body weight every 3 weeks) or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (topotecan, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan, or pemetrexed). The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 502 patients underwent randomization (253 were assigned to the tisotumab vedotin group and 249 to the chemotherapy group); the groups were similar with respect to demographic and disease characteristics. The median overall survival was significantly longer in the tisotumab vedotin group than in the chemotherapy group (11.5 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 9.8 to 14.9] vs. 9.5 months [95% CI, 7.9 to 10.7]), results that represented a 30% lower risk of death with tisotumab vedotin than with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.89; two-sided P = 0.004). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 4.4) with tisotumab vedotin and 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 3.1) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82; two-sided P<0.001). The confirmed objective response rate was 17.8% in the tisotumab vedotin group and 5.2% in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.6; two-sided P<0.001). A total of 98.4% of patients in the tisotumab vedotin group and 99.2% in the chemotherapy group had at least one adverse event that occurred during the treatment period (defined as the period from day 1 of dose 1 until 30 days after the last dose); grade 3 or greater events occurred in 52.0% and 62.3%, respectively. A total of 14.8% of patients stopped tisotumab vedotin treatment because of toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recurrent cervical cancer, second- or third-line treatment with tisotumab vedotin resulted in significantly greater efficacy than chemotherapy. (Funded by Genmab and Seagen [acquired by Pfizer]; innovaTV 301 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04697628.).

Daratumumab in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of clinically relevant subgroups in GRIFFIN.

The randomized, phase 2 GRIFFIN study (NCT02874742) evaluated daratumumab plus lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We present final post hoc analyses (median follow-up, 49.6 months) of clinically relevant subgroups, including patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) per revised definition (del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], t[14;20], and/or gain/amp[1q21]). Patients received 4 induction cycles (D-RVd/RVd), high-dose therapy/transplant, 2 consolidation cycles (D-RVd/RVd), and lenalidomide±daratumumab maintenance (≤ 2 years). Minimal residual disease-negativity (10-5) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd in patients ≥ 65 years (67.9% vs 17.9%), with HRCAs (54.8% vs 32.4%), and with gain/amp(1q21) (61.8% vs 28.6%). D-RVd showed a trend toward improved progression-free survival versus RVd (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) in patients ≥ 65 years (0.29 [0.06-1.48]), with HRCAs (0.38 [0.14-1.01]), and with gain/amp(1q21) (0.42 [0.14-1.27]). In the functional high-risk subgroup (not MRD negative at the end of consolidation), the hazard ratio was 0.82 (0.35-1.89). Among patients ≥ 65 years, grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd (88.9% vs 77.8%), as were TEAEs leading to discontinuation of ≥ 1 treatment component (37.0% vs 25.9%). One D-RVd patient died due to an unrelated TEAE. These results support the addition of daratumumab to RVd in transplant-eligible patients with high-risk NDMM. Video Abstract.

Successful Treatment of Stimulator of Interferon Genes-Associated Vasculopathy of Infantile Onset SAVI Syndrome With Anifrolumab.

This case report describes a woman in her 30s who presented with cutaneous lesions since age of 2 to 3 years with erythema and pain on her nose, both cheeks, and ears when exposed to cold temperatures that progressed to nasal and auricular cartilage necrosis and was diagnosed with stimulator of interferon genes­associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI syndrome).

Delayed treatment of cynomolgus macaques with a FVM04/CA45 monoclonal antibody cocktail provides complete protection against lethal Sudan virus infection.

Sudan ebolavirus (SUDV) is a member of the genus Ebolavirus (Family Filoviridae) and has caused sporadic outbreaks of Ebola disease (EBOD), or more specifically Sudan virus disease (SVD), with high mortality rates in Africa. Current vaccines and therapies that have been developed for filoviruses are almost all specific for Ebola virus (EBOV; of the species Zaire ebolavirus), and there is a current lack of therapeutics specific for SUDV. The recent SUDV outbreak in Uganda, which was distributed across multiple districts, including Kampala, a densely populated urban center, highlights the critical need for the development of novel SUDV-specific or pan-Ebola virus therapeutics. Previous work has characterized two monoclonal antibodies, FVM04 and CA45, which have neutralization capabilities against both EBOV and SUDV and have shown protective efficacy in animal challenge studies. Here, we expand upon this work, showing that treatment with a monoclonal antibody cocktail consisting of FVM04 and CA45 provides full protection against lethal SUDV infection in cynomolgus macaques. Studies that evaluate outcomes at late time points after infection, once clinical signs of illness are apparent, are vital for assessing the therapeutic efficacy of antibody therapeutics. We have shown that when treatment is initiated as late as 5 days after infection, with a second dose given on day 8, that treated groups showed few clinical signs or morbidity, with complete survival. This work provides further evidence that FVM04 and CA45 have strong therapeutic potential against SUDV and their development as a pan-Ebola virus therapeutic should be pursued. IMPORTANCE: There are currently no approved vaccines or therapeutics for Sudan virus, a filovirus which is highly related to Ebola virus and causes similar disease and outbreaks. In this study, a cocktail of two potent monoclonal antibodies that effectively neutralize Sudan virus was tested in a nonhuman primate model of Sudan virus disease. Treatment was highly effective, even when initiated as late as 5 days after infection, when clinical signs of infection were already evident. All treated animals showed complete recovery from infection, with little evidence of disease, while all animals that received a control treatment succumbed to infection within 8 days. The study further demonstrated the strong therapeutic potential of the antibody treatment and supported further development for use in Sudan virus outbreaks.

Lipid- and polymer-based formulations containing TNF-α inhibitors for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.

Monoclonal antibodies inhibiting tumor necrosis factor-alpha (iTNF-α) have revolutionized the therapeutic regimen of inflammatory bowel disease, but their main drawback is the parenteral route of administration they require. An alternative approach lies in the delivery of these molecules to the area involved in the inflammatory process by means of innovative formulations able to promote their localization in affected tissues while also decreasing the number of administrations required. This review describes the advantages deriving from the use of lipid- and polymer-based systems containing iTNF-α, focusing on their physicochemical and technological properties and discussing the preclinical results obtained in vivo using rodent models of colitis.

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: A large real-life worldwide population.

BACKGROUND: The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial showed a survival benefit with durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). To understand this combination's real-world efficacy and tolerability, we conducted a global multicenter retrospective analysis of its first-line treatment outcomes. METHODS: We included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with durvalumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin at 39 sites in 11 countries (Europe, the United States, and Asia). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 666 patients were enrolled. Median OS was 15.1 months and median PFS was 8.2 months. The investigator-assessed overall response rate was 32.7 %, with stable disease in 45.2 % of patients. High baseline CEA levels, ECOG PS > 0, metastatic disease, and NLR > 3 were associated with poor survival. Any grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 92.9 % of patients (grade >2: 46.6 %). Immune-related AEs (irAEs) occurred in 20.0 % (grade >2: 2.5 %). Three deaths (0.5 %) were deemed treatment-related, none linked to immunotherapy. Common irAEs were rash (8.2 % all grades; 0.3 % grade >2), itching (10.3 % all grades; 0.2 % grade >2), and hypothyroidism (5.1 % all grades; 0.3 % grade >2). Durvalumab discontinuation rate due to AEs was 1.5 %. ESMO-recommended genes were analyzed and no outcome differences were found. A comparative analysis with a historical cohort of patients treated with chemotherapy alone confirmed the positive survival impact of durvalumab in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine. CONCLUSION: This first global real-world analysis largely confirmed the TOPAZ-1 findings, supporting gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab as a first-line standard of care for patients with advanced BTC.