Safety and Effectiveness of High-Intensity Statins Versus Low/Moderate-Intensity Statins Plus Ezetimibe in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease for Reaching LDL-C Goals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether adding ezetimibe to low/moderate-intensity statins has a more beneficial impact on the treatment efficacy and safety of patients with existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) compared to high-intensity statin regimens. HYPOTHESIS: A combination of low/moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe might be more effective and safer than high-intensity statin monotherapy. METHODS: We searched databases for randomized controlled trials comparing lipid profile alterations, drug-related adverse events, and MACE components between high-intensity statin monotherapy and low/moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe combination therapy. Pooled risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Our comprehensive search resulted in 32 studies comprising 6162 patients treated with monotherapy against 5880 patients on combination therapy. Combination therapy was more effective in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels compared to monotherapy (MD = -6.6, 95% CI: -10.6 to -2.5); however, no significant differences were observed in other lipid parameters. Furthermore, the combination therapy group experienced a lower risk of myalgia (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13-0.57) and discontinuation due to adverse events (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.74). The occurrence of MACE was similar between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ezetimibe to low/moderate-intensity statins resulted in a greater reduction in LDL-C levels, a lower rate of myalgia, and less drug discontinuation compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with existing cardiovascular disease. However, according to our meta-analysis, the observed reduction in LDL-C levels in the combination group did not correlate with a reduction in MACE compared to the high-intensity statin group.

Ebronucimab in Chinese patients with hypercholesterolemia---A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ebronucimab.

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of PCSK9 monoclonal antibody(mAb) specifically for Chinese patients have been limited. This multi-center RCT is to clarify the efficacy and safety of a novel mAb, Ebronucimab, in Chinese patients. Patients diagnosed with primary hypercholesterolemia, including Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia, or mixed dyslipidemia, were categorized by ASCVD risk and randomly assigned at a ratio of 2:1:2:1 to receive Ebronucimab 450 mg or matching placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W), or Ebronucimab 150 mg or matching placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W). The primary outcome was the percentage change of LDL-C from baseline to week 12 for all groups. The least squares mean reduction difference (95 %CI) in LDL-C from baseline to week 12 of Ebronucimab 450 mg Q4W and Ebronucimab 150 mg Q2W groups versus the placebo group was -59.13 (-64.103, -54.153) (Adjusted p<0.0001) and -60.43 (-65.450, -55.416) (Adjusted p<0.0001), respectively. Meanwhile, the Ebronucimab group exhibited notably high rates in reaching LDL-C goals of each cardiovascular risk stratification. In addition, Ebronucimab effectively improved other lipid panel. During the double-blind treatment period, relatively frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were injection site reactions (ISR), urinary tract infection, and hyperuricemia (Incidence rate are 6.9 %, 4.8 % and 3.5 %). Among treatment-associated AEs, only injection site reactions (ISR) occurred more in the dose groups. In conclusion, Ebronucimab, with either 450 mg Q4W or 150 mg Q2W doses, demonstrated significant efficacy in lowering serum LDL-C level with a favorable safety and immunogenicity profile among hypercholesterolemic patients.

Course of the effects of LDL-cholesterol reduction on cardiovascular risk over time: A meta-analysis of 60 randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Individuals with or at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) often receive long-term treatment with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapies, but whether the effects of LDL-C reduction remain stable over time is uncertain. This study aimed to establish the course of the effects of LDL-C reduction on cardiovascular risk over time. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LDL-C lowering therapies were identified through a search in MEDLINE and EMBASE (1966-January 2023). The primary analyses were restricted to statins, ezetimibe, and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, with other therapies included in sensitivity analyses. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to establish the hazard ratio (HR) for major vascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or stroke) per 1 mmol/L LDL-C reduction. Course of the effects over time was assessed using random-effects meta-regression analyses for the association between follow-up duration, age, and the HR for major vascular events per 1 mmol/L LDL-C reduction. Additionally, treatment-by-time interactions were evaluated in an individual participant data meta-analysis of six atorvastatin trials. RESULTS: A total of 60 RCTs were identified (408,959 participants, 51,425 major vascular events). The HR for major vascular events per 1 mmol/L LDL-C reduction was 0.78 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.75-0.81). Follow-up duration was not associated with a change in the HR for major vascular events (HR for change per year 0.994; 95 % CI 0.970-1.020; p = 0.66). The HR attenuated with increasing age in primary prevention (HR for change per 5 years 1.097; 95 % CI 1.031-1.168; p = 0.003), but not secondary prevention (HR for change per 5 years 0.987; 95 % CI 0.936-1.040; p = 0.63). Consistent results were found for statin trials only, and all trials combined. In the individual participant data meta-analysis (31,310 participants, 6734 major vascular events), the HR for major vascular events did not significantly change over follow-up time (HR for change per year 0.983; 95 % CI 0.943-1.025; p = 0.42), or age (HR for change per 5 years 1.022; 95 % CI 0.990-1.055; p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Based on available RCT data with limited follow-up duration, the relative treatment effects of LDL-C reduction are stable over time in secondary prevention, but may attenuate with higher age in primary prevention.

Cholesterol lowering depletes atherosclerotic lesions of smooth muscle cell-derived fibromyocytes and chondromyocytes.

Drugs that lower plasma apolipoprotein B (ApoB)-containing lipoproteins are central to treating advanced atherosclerosis and provide partial protection against clinical events. Previous research showed that lowering ApoB-containing lipoproteins stops plaque inflammation, but how these drugs affect the heterogeneous population of plaque cells derived from smooth muscle cells (SMCs) is unknown. SMC-derived cells are the main cellular component of atherosclerotic lesions and the source of structural components that determine the size of plaques and their propensity to rupture and trigger thrombosis, the proximate cause of heart attack and stroke. Using lineage tracing and single-cell techniques to investigate the full SMC-derived cellular compartment in progressing and regressing plaques in mice, here we show that lowering ApoB-containing lipoproteins reduces nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells signaling in SMC-derived fibromyocytes and chondromyocytes and leads to depletion of these abundant cell types from plaques. These results uncover an important mechanism through which cholesterol-lowering drugs can achieve plaque regression.

The impact of statin-ezetimibe combination therapy versus statin monotherapy on coronary plaque regression in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of statin monotherapy and statin-ezetimibe combination therapy on coronary plaque regression in acute coronary syndrome patients. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted from July to September 2022 and comprised search on PubMed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane databases to identify studies from January 2010 to July 2022 assessing the effects of statin-ezetimibe combination therapy versus statin monotherapy on coronary plaque regression in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The outcomes of interest were total atheroma volume, plaque volume, and percent atheroma volume assessed by intravascular ultrasound. Meta-analyses were performed on the studies, and mean differences with 95% confidence interval were estimated using Review Manager v5.4. RESULTS: Of the 730 studies identified, 12(1.64%) were shortlisted, and, of them, 5(41.7%) were analysed in detail. There were a total of 557 patients with a mean follow-up of 9 ± 2.43 months. The difference between baseline and follow-up showed significant lowering in total atheroma volume, plaque volume, and percent atheroma volume (p<0.05) in the patients who were receiving statin-ezetimibe combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ezetimibe to statin medication was found to be significantly more successful in reducing coronary plaque than statin monotherapy.

Causal association between triglycerides and cholesterol-lowering medication with non-rheumatic valve disease: A 2-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Previous studies have found a possible causal relationship between triglycerides and lipid-lowering drugs and valvular disease. The aim of this study was to explore the potential causal relationship between triglycerides and lipid-lowering drugs and valvular disease using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Data sets associated with triglycerides (441,016 participants and 12,321,875 single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) and cholesterol-lowering drugs (209,638 participants and 9851,867 SNPs) were retrieved from the Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) database. A total of 297 and 49 SNPs significantly associated with triglycerides and cholesterol-lowering drugs, respectively (P < 5 × 10-8), were identified. Similarly, data sets for non-rheumatic valve diseases (NVDs) (361,194 participants and 10,080,950 SNPs) were obtained from the GWAS database. Inverse variance weighting was used as the primary method for calculating the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode analyses were also used to test the robustness of the main results. The MR-Egger intercept test and the MR-PRESSO test were used to evaluate horizontal pleiotropy. Inverse variance weighted (IVW) results showed that both triglyceride and cholesterol-lowering medication were positively associated with NVDs (OR = 1.001, 95% CI 1.000-1.0012, P = 0.006; OR = 1.007, 95% CI 1.003-1.010; P = 0.002). This study suggests that both triglyceride and cholesterol-lowering medications are positively associated with NVDs, suggesting that lowering triglyceride levels or the use of cholesterol-lowering medications may reduce the incidence of NVDs. However, larger samples are required for further validation.

Efficacy of Alirocumab, Evolocumab, and Inclisiran in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia at Increased Cardiovascular Risk.

Background and Objectives: Lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) levels is critical for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, yet some patients fail to reach the LDL-C targets despite available intensive lipid-lowering therapies. This study assessed the effectiveness and safety profile of alirocumab, evolocumab, and inclisiran in lipid reduction. Materials and Methods: A cohort of 51 patients (median (Q1-Q3) age: 49.0 (39.5-57.5) years) was analyzed. Eligibility included an LDL-C level > 2.5 mmol/L while on the maximum tolerated dose of statin and ezetimibe, a diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia, or a very high risk of cardiovascular diseases following myocardial infarction within 12 months prior to the study. Follow-ups and lab assessments were conducted at baseline (51 patients), 3 months (51 patients), and 15 months (26 patients) after the treatment initiation. Results: Median initial LDL-C levels 4.1 (2.9-5.0) mmol/L, decreasing significantly to 1.1 (0.9-1.6) mmol/L at 3 months and 1.0 (0.7-1.8) mmol/L at 15 months (p < 0.001). Total cholesterol also reduced significantly compared to baseline at both intervals (p < 0.001). No substantial differences in LDL-C or total cholesterol levels were observed between 3- and 15-month observations (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were noted in cholesterol reduction among the alirocumab, evolocumab, and inclisiran groups at 3 months. The safety profile was favorable, with no reported adverse cardiovascular events or significant changes in alanine transaminase, creatinine, or creatine kinase levels. Conclusions: Alirocumab, evolocumab, and inclisiran notably decreased LDL-C and total cholesterol levels without significant adverse effects, underscoring their potential as effective treatments in patients who do not achieve lipid targets with conventional therapies.

Differential Adherence to Free and Single-Pill Combination of Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe: Findings from a Real-World Analysis in Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to cardiovascular drug treatment can significantly benefit from a reduced pill burden, but data on this matter derived from real-life settings are currently scanty. This analysis assessed the possible changes in adherence in patients treated with rosuvastatin and ezetimibe (ROS/EZE) as free multi-pill combination who switched to ROS/EZE as single-pill combination in the setting of real clinical practice in Italy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the administrative databases for a catchment area of about seven million health-assisted residents. Adults receiving ROS/EZE as a single-pill combination from January 2010 to June 2020 (followed up to 2021) were identified. The date of the first prescription of single-pill combination of ROS/EZE was considered as the index date. The analysis included the users of ROS/EZE as a free combination during the year before the index date. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected during the period of data availability prior to the index date. Adherence to therapy was evaluated as proportion of days covered (PDC), namely the percentage of days during which a patient had access to medication, in the 12-month interval preceding or following the index date (PDC < 25% non-adherence; PDC = 25-75% partial adherence; PDC > 75% adherence). RESULTS: A total of 1219 patients (61.1% male, aged 66.2 ± 10.4 years) were included. Cardiovascular comorbidities were found in 83.3% of them, diabetes in 26.4%, and a combination of both in 16.2%. Single-pill combination of ROS/EZE was associated with a higher proportion of adherent patients compared to free-pill combination (75.2% vs 51.8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world analysis suggested that switching from a regimen based on separate pills to one based on a single-pill combination resulted in improved adherence to ROS/EZE therapy.

Lipid-lowering therapy to control low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels is essential for cardiovascular risk prevention. Successful therapy depends on the type of lipid-lowering therapy, i.e., low or high statin intensity and combination of statins with ezetimibe or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, and adherence to therapy, i.e., whether the patient actually takes their pills as prescribed. If there are fewer pills to be taken, this can help patients to follow their treatment. Single-pill combinations of two drugs could facilitate adherence and thus the chances of reaching the recommended lipid targets. Here, we analyzed a sample of Italian patients with dyslipidemia to examine whether the switch from a free combination of two separate pills of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe to a single-pill combination of the same drugs could improve adherence to therapy. We found that the proportion of adherent patients increased from about just over half (51.8%) to about three-fourths (75.1%) when switching from two-pill to single-pill combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe. These findings suggest that simplifying therapy can help improve patient adherence, which is essential for reaching lipid targets and ultimately for alleviating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Cholesterol Lowering in Older Adults: Should We Wait for Further Evidence?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Current guidelines for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in adults up to age 75 years are well-established. However, recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), particularly for primary prevention, are inconclusive after age 75. In this review, we focus on adults ≥ 75 years to assess low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) as a marker for predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, review risk assessment tools, highlight guidelines for LLT, and discuss benefits, risks, and deprescribing strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: The relationship between LDL-C and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in older adults is complex and confounded. Current ASCVD risk estimators heavily depend on age and lack geriatric-specific variables. Emerging tools may reclassify individuals based on biologic rather than chronologic age, with coronary artery calcium scores gaining popularity. After initiating LLT for primary or secondary prevention, target LDL-C levels for older adults are lacking, and non-statin therapy thresholds remain unknown, relying on evidence from younger populations. Shared decision-making is crucial, considering therapy's time to benefit, life expectancy, adverse events, and geriatric syndromes. Deprescribing is recommended in end-of-life care but remains unclear in fit or frail older adults. After an ASCVD event, LLT is appropriate for most older adults, and deprescribing can be considered for those approaching the last months of life. Ongoing trials will guide statin prescription and deprescribing among older adults free of ASCVD. In the interim, for adults ≥ 75 years without a limited life expectancy who are free of ASCVD, an LLT approach that includes both lifestyle and medications, specifically statins, may be considered after shared decision-making.

Therapy for Hyperlipidemia.

Significant advances in atherosclerotic cardiovascular (ASCVD) risk stratification and treatment have occurred over the past 10 years. While the lipid panel continues to be the basis of risk estimation, imaging for coronary artery calcium is now widely used in estimating risk at the individual level. Statins remain first-line agents for ASCVD risk reduction but in high-risk patients, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin-9 inhibitors, and bempedoic acid can be added to further reduce individual cardiovascular risk based on results of cardiovascular outcomes trials. Results of randomized control trials do not support use of medications targeted at triglyceride lowering for ASCVD risk reduction, but icosapent ethyl can be considered.

Early administration of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: High-intensity statin therapy is currently recommended initial guideline therapy in ACS treatment. However, only a minority of patients are achieving LDL-C attainment goal at 6 months. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are on recommended guideline therapy post-ACS if LDL-C goal attainment is not achieved after high-intensity statin (4-6 weeks) and after the addition of ezetimibe if guideline goal attainment is not achieved after an additional 4-6 weeks. Thus, it has been recommended that PCSK9 inhibitors be considered earlier post-ACS. However, the efficacy of early PCSK9 inhibitors initiation in ACS patients remains uncertain. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies involving ACS patients who received PCSK9 inhibitors within 48 h of hospitalization were included. Common and random effects models were used to evaluate the pooled effect of early PCSK9 inhibitor administration. Nine RCTs and three cohort studies were included. RESULTS: Early PCSK9 inhibitor administration reduced the incidence of MI, ACS hospitalization, and revascularization at 6-18 months post-ACS. Although there was a drift towards reduced stroke, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular death, no statistically significant reduction was observed. Additionally, PCSK9 inhibitors significantly enhanced lipid control at 4-12 weeks after index hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Early PCSK9 inhibitors initiation in ACS patients reduces MACE and improves lipid profiles. While the results propose promising benefits in terms of stroke and mortality, further research with longer follow-up is required for more decisive evidence.

Safety and efficacy of PCSK9 inhibitor (evolocumab) in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and non-culprit artery critical lesions: a randomised controlled trial protocol (SPECIAL study).

INTRODUCTION: Patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and concomitant multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) are considered patients with extremely high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and current guidelines specify a lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target for this population. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have been shown to effectively reduce LDL-C levels on a statin background. Additionally, several studies have confirmed the role of PCSK9 inhibitors in plaque regression and reducing residual cardiovascular risk in patients with ACS. However, those studies included coronary lesions with a degree of stenosis <50%. Whether the application of PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with NSTE-ACS with non-culprit artery critical lesions (stenosis degree between 50% and 75%) has a similar effect on plaque regression and improvement of cardiovascular outcomes remains unknown, with a lack of relevant research. This study aims to further investigate the safety and efficacy of evolocumab in patients with NSTE-ACS and concomitant multivessel CAD (non-culprit artery stenosis between 50% and 75%). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single-centre clinical randomised controlled trial, 122 patients with NSTE-ACS and concomitant multivessel CAD (non-culprit artery stenosis between 50% and 75%) will be randomly assigned to either the evolocumab treatment group or the standard treatment group after completing culprit vessel revascularisation. The evolocumab treatment group will receive evolocumab in addition to statin therapy, while the standard treatment group will receive standard statin therapy. At baseline and week 50, patients in the evolocumab treatment group will undergo coronary angiography and OCT imaging to visualise pre-existing non-lesional vessels. The primary end point is the absolute change in average minimum fibrous cap thickness (FCT) from baseline to week 50. Secondary end points include changes in plaque lipid arc, lipid length, macrophage grading, lipid levels and major adverse cardiovascular events during the 1-year follow-up period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics: this study will adhere to the principles outlined in the Helsinki Declaration and other applicable ethical guidelines. This study protocol has received approval from the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), with approval number 2022-ky214. DISSEMINATION: we plan to disseminate the findings of this study through various channels. This includes publication in peer-reviewed academic journals, presentation at relevant academic conferences and communication to the public, policymakers and healthcare professionals. We will also share updates on the research progress through social media and other online platforms to facilitate the exchange and application of scientific knowledge. Efforts will be made to ensure widespread dissemination of the research results and to have a positive impact on society. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200066675.

Emerging therapies for refractory hypercholesterolemia: a narrative review.

Refractory hypercholesterolemia (RH) is characterized by the failure of patients to achieve therapeutic targets for low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) despite receiving maximal tolerable doses of standard lipid-lowering treatments. It predominantly impacts individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), thereby elevating the risk of cardiovascular complications. The prevalence of RH is now recognized to be substantially greater than previously thought. This review provides a comprehensive insight into current and emerging therapies for RH patients, including groundbreaking genetic-based therapeutic approaches. The review places emphasis on the dependency of therapies on low-density lipoprotein receptors (LDLRs) and highlights the critical role of considering LDLR activity in RH patients for individualization of the treatment.

Refractory hypercholesterolemia (RH) is a condition where patients are unable to get below target levels of 'bad' cholesterol despite receiving maximum doses of standard treatments. It is commonly present in those with a genetic disorder, called familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), known to increase the risk of heart complications. RH's prevalence is now understood to be higher than previously believed and this review offers insights into current and emerging therapies for RH, including genetic-based treatments. It stresses the importance of the mechanistic pathways behind cholesterol clearance, particularly low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) activity, in RH treatment customization.

Consensus document on diagnosis and management of familial hypercholesterolemia from the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis (SISA).

AIMS: Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder of lipoprotein metabolism that causes an increased risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Although early diagnosis and treatment of FH can significantly improve the cardiovascular prognosis, this disorder is underdiagnosed and undertreated. For these reasons the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis (SISA) assembled a Consensus Panel with the task to provide guidelines for FH diagnosis and treatment. DATA SYNTHESIS: Our guidelines include: i) an overview of the genetic complexity of FH and the role of candidate genes involved in LDL metabolism; ii) the prevalence of FH in the population; iii) the clinical criteria adopted for the diagnosis of FH; iv) the screening for ASCVD and the role of cardiovascular imaging techniques; v) the role of molecular diagnosis in establishing the genetic bases of the disorder; vi) the current therapeutic options in both heterozygous and homozygous FH. Treatment strategies and targets are currently based on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, as the prognosis of FH largely depends on the magnitude of LDL-C reduction achieved by lipid-lowering therapies. Statins with or without ezetimibe are the mainstay of treatment. Addition of novel medications like PCSK9 inhibitors, ANGPTL3 inhibitors or lomitapide in homozygous FH results in a further reduction of LDL-C levels. LDL apheresis is indicated in FH patients with inadequate response to cholesterol-lowering therapies. CONCLUSION: FH is a common, treatable genetic disorder and, although our understanding of this disease has improved, many challenges still remain with regard to its identification and management.

Alirocumab: Pediatric First Approval.

Alirocumab (Praluent®), a proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor that has been co-developed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sanofi (formerly sanofi-aventis), is approved globally for use in adults with established cardiovascular disease, primary hyperlipidemia [including heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) or homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)]. In November 2023, based on clinical data in patients aged 8-17 years, alirocumab received its first pediatric approval in the EU as an adjunct to diet alone, or in combination with a statin and/or other low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapies, in pediatric patients aged ≥ 8 years with HeFH. Alirocumab was approved a few months later in the US for use as an adjunct to diet and other LDL-C-lowering therapies in pediatric patients aged ≥ 8 years with HeFH to reduce LDL-C. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of alirocumab leading to this first pediatric approval for HeFH.