Adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis. / Adesão ao tratamento medicamentoso anti-hipertensivo no Brasil: revisão sistemática e meta-análise.

This article aims to evaluate the adherence to antihypertensive treatment prevalence in the Brazilian population based on peer-reviewed studies which used instruments exclusively designed and/or adapted for this purpose. A systematic review with meta-analysis based on the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The search was carried out in the BDENF, SciELO, Cuiden, PsycINFOe, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, and MEDLINE databases, as well as the AgeLine, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect academic search engines. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021292689). Random effects models were used for a meta-analysis of the prevalence obtained from individual studies. A total of 104 studies were included in the meta-analysis on antihypertensive treatment in the Brazilian population, totaling 38,299 patients. The most used instrument was the four-item Morisky-Green Test (49.5%). The adherence prevalence estimated by the meta-analysis was 44.4% (95%CI: 39.12%-49.94%, I2 = 91.17, p < 0.001), showing high heterogeneity. The adherence to antihypertensive treatment prevalence found in national studies was unsatisfactory, demonstrating that this problem continues to be a major challenge.

O objetivo do artigo é avaliar a prevalência de adesão ao tratamento anti-hipertensivo na população brasileira, com base nos estudos revisados por pares, que utilizaram instrumentos elaborados e/ou adaptados exclusivamente para este fim. Revisão sistemática com meta-análise, baseada nas recomendações do Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A busca foi realizada nas bases BDENF, SciELO, Cuiden, PsycINFOe, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE, e nos buscadores acadêmicos AgeLine, Google Scholar e ScienceDirect. O protocolo foi registrado no PROSPERO (CRD42021292689). Modelos de efeitos aleatórios foram usados para meta-análise das prevalências obtidas dos estudos individuais. Incluíram-se 104 estudos na meta-análise sobre tratamento anti-hipertensivo na população brasileira, totalizando 38.299 pacientes. O instrumento mais utilizado foi o teste de Morisky-Green de quatro itens (49,5%). A prevalência de adesão estimada pela foi de 44,4% (IC95%: 39,12%-49,94%, I2 = 91,17, p < 0,001), apresentando alta heterogeneidade. A prevalência de adesão ao tratamento anti-hipertensivo encontrada nos estudos nacionais foi insatisfatória, demonstrando que essa problemática continua sendo um grande desafio.

A Survey of Availability and Affordability of Polypills for Cardiovascular Disease in Selected Countries.

Background: The recent inclusion of polypills-fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensive medicines and a statin with or without aspirin-in the World Health Organization's Essential Medicines List (EML) reiterates the potential of this approach to improve global treatment coverage for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Although there exists extensive evidence on the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of polypills, there has been no research to date assessing the real-world availability and affordability of polypills globally. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey, based on the WHO/Health Action International methodology, in 13 countries around the world. In the surveyed countries, we first ascertained whether any polypill was authorised for marketing and/or included in EMLs and clinical guidelines. In each country, we collected retail and price data for polypills from at least one public-sector facility and three private pharmacies using convenience sampling. Polypills were considered unaffordable if the lowest-paid worker spent more than a day's wage to purchase a monthly supply. Results: Polypills were approved for marketing in four of the 13 surveyed countries: Spain, India, Mauritius and Argentina. None of these countries included polypills in national guidelines, formularies, or EMLs. In the four countries, no surveyed public pharmacies stocked polypills. In the private sector, we identified seven unique polypill combinations, marketed by eight different companies. Private sector availability was 100% in Argentina and Spain. Most combinations (n = 5) identified were in India. Combinations found in India and Spain were affordable in the local context. A lowest-paid government worker would spend between 0.2 (India) and 2.8 (Mauritius) days' wages to pay the price for one month's supply of the polypills. Polypills were likely to be affordable if they were manufactured in the same country. Conclusion: Low availability and affordability of polypills in the public sector suggest that implementation remains poor globally. Context-specific multi-disciplinary health system research is required to understand factors affecting polypill implementation and to design and evaluate appropriate implementation strategies.

Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as a Substitute for Medications in Patients with Mild-to-moderate Glaucoma in the Brazilian Public Health System.

PRCIS: Selective laser trabeculoplasty can be used as a substitute for medications in patients with mild-to-moderate glaucoma, reducing the cost of eye drop distribution in the Brazilian public health system. PURPOSE: To observe the effectiveness of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) as a substitute for eye drops in patients with open angle glaucoma in the Brazilian Public Health System. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SLT was performed bilaterally after medication washout. This is a prospective interventional study comparing intraocular pressure (IOP) when using eye drops at baseline (post-washout), and at 12-month follow-up after SLT. Medication was added if the target IOP was not achieved, following the Brazilian Public Health System eye drops protocol, based on medication costs. Absolute (without eye drops) and qualified (with eye drops) success were measured with IOP ≤ 21, IOP ≤ 18, IOP ≤ 15 and IOP ≤ 12 mm Hg. Besides IOP evolution, the ability to reduce IOP (in %), and eye drops reduction were evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-two eyes of 46 patients were included, 70 eyes with mild glaucoma and 22 with moderate glaucoma; the mean number of eye drops was 2.26±1.06 (82.6% were using a prostaglandin analogue), and post-washout IOP of 21.10±5.24 mm Hg. There was relative success at IOP ≤18 mm Hg, where the mild group had greater success than the moderate group (88.1% vs. 71.4%, P =0.824). The average IOP reductions were 23.04% and 25.74% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The average number of eye drops was 1.02, with 1.1% using a prostaglandin analogue. Furthermore, 68.19% of the patients had a decrease in the quantity of eye drops used. CONCLUSION: SLT is effective in reducing IOP and replacing eye drops in patients in the Brazilian Public Health System. Moreover, there was a significant reduction in the use of prostaglandin analogues.

Relatório de recomendação final para adoção de um protocolo estadual no estado de Santa Catarina complementar ao protocolo clínico e diretrizes terapêuticas do ministério da saúde para tratamento farmacológico da hipertensão pulmonar no âmbito do SUS / Final recommendation report for the adoption of a state protocol in the state of Santa Catarina complementary to the clinical protocol and therapeutic guidelines of the Ministry of Health for pharmacological treatment of pulmonary hypertension within the scope of the SUS

Este relatório refere-se à análise crítica do documento "Diagnóstico e Tratamento de Hipertensão Pulmonar'', elaborado pela ACAPTI e enviado como proposta para elaboração de Protocolo Estadual de Hipertensão Pulmonar, contemplando o tratamento farmacológico de HP grupo 1 (HAP) e grupo 4 (HPTEC). No documento encaminhado pelo demandante consta uma breve introdução e contextualização da patologia, diagnóstico clínico e exames complementares, critérios de inclusão e exclusão, especialidades médicas, estratificação de risco e seguimento, tratamento medicamentoso, algoritmo de tratamento medicamentoso, acessos aos medicamentos e centros de referência. Os itens relacionados ao diagnóstico foram mantidos neste relatório, conforme o documento enviado pelo demandante. Este relatório visa avaliar e emitir um parecer técnico embasado em evidências científicas sobre a disponibilização do medicamento Selexipague, a disponibilização da terapia combinada (Ambrisentana, Bosentana, Sildenafila, Ilopros a e Selexipague) para o tratamento da HP grupo 1 (HAP), a disponibilização do medicamento Riociguate para tratamento de HP grupo 4 (HPTEC), algoritmo de tratamento medicamentoso e fluxo de acesso aos medicamentos, para posterior elaboração de um Protocolo Estadual para a patologia solicitada. O Protocolo Estadual será elaborado complementarmente ao protocolo do Ministério da Saúde, assim, caso os medicamentos englobados nele sejam incorporados para a patologia em questão pela CONITEC, o fornecimento dos mesmos passa a ser por meio do CEAF.

Eficácia e segurança da tripla terapia com Selexipague comparada à dupla terapia para tratamento de hipertensão arterial pulmonar: revisão rápida de evidências / Effectiveness and safety of triple therapy with Selexipag compared dual therapy for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: rapid response review of evidence

Selexipague e outros medicamentos de controle da Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar grupo 1. Indicação: Tratamento de Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar grupo 1. Pergunta: Há superioridade em eficácia e segurança da tripla terapia com selexipague, comparado a dupla terapia, disponível no SUS, no tratamento de Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar grupo 1? Métodos: Revisão rápida de evidências (overview) de ensaios clínicos randomizados e revisões sistemáticas, com levantamento bibliográfico realizado na base de dados PUBMED, utilizando estratégia estruturada de busca. A qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas foi avaliada pela ferramenta risco de viés da Cochrane. Resultados: Foi selecionado um ensaio clínico randomizado, especificamente um artigo contendo análise de subgrupo de dados desse estudo. Conclusão: As evidências demonstraram redução do número de hospitalizações relacionadas à HAP e de eventos de progressão da doença no tratamento de selexipague em tripla terapia em pacientes na classe funcional II, quando comparada à dupla terapia sem selexipague. A tripla terapia é tão segura quanto a dupla terapia, pois tem riscos similares de eventos adversos e eventos adversos sérios. A tripla terapia não é diferente da dupla terapia no risco da mortalidade geral

Selexipag and other drugs for the control of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension group 1. Indication: Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension group 1. Question: Is there superiority in efficacy and safety of triple therapy with selexipag, compared to dual therapy, available in the SUS, in the treatment of ulmonary Arterial Hypertension group 1? Methods: Rapid review of evidence (overview) of randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews, with a bibliographic survey carried out in the PUBMED database, using a structured search strategy. Results: A randomized clinical trial was selected, specifically an article showing a subgroup analysis of data from this study. Conclusion: Evidence showed a reduction in the number of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension related hospitalizations and disease progression events in the treatment of selexipag in triple therapy in patients in functional class II, when compared to dual therapy without selexipag. Triple therapy is as safe as dual therapy, as it has similar risks of adverse events and serious adverse events. Triple therapy is no different from dual therapy in the risk of overall mortality

Different profiles of circulating arginase 2 in subtypes of preeclampsia pregnant women.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Preeclampsia (PE) is a gestational hypertensive disease responsible for high maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The increase in blood pressure is associated with a decrease in the bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO). Arginase interferes with NO production consuming L-arginine, a substrate required by endothelial NO synthase to NO formation. No previous study has quantified the circulating levels of the two arginase isoforms (arginase 1 and arginase 2) in the plasma of pregnant women with PE. Therefore, our objective is to evaluate these plasma levels in healthy pregnant women and PE with or without severe features and who respond or not to antihypertensive therapy. METHODS: We compared 29 healthy pregnant women with 56 pregnant women with PE, who were also divided into with severe features (n = 24) or without severe features (n = 32) and into responsive (n = 29) or nonresponsive to antihypertensive therapy (n = 27). We quantified the plasmatic expression of arginase 1 and arginase 2 by ELISA kits. RESULTS: While similar levels of arginase 1 were found among groups, lower arginase 2 plasma levels were found in PE without severe features and responsive to antihypertensive drugs when compared to healthy pregnant women. There was no difference between arginase 2 levels in PE with severe features and nonresponsive group when compared to healthy pregnant women. CONCLUSION: This shows different circulation profiles of arginase 2 among groups, suggesting the existence of mechanisms of arginase 2 modulation in pregnant women with PE associated with the severity of the disease and responsiveness to antihypertensive treatment.

Central nervous system, peripheral and hemodynamic effects of nanoformulated anandamide in hypertension.

PURPOSE: Hypertensive lesions induce alterations at hemodynamic, peripheral, and central levels. Anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamine; AEA) protects neurons from inflammatory damage, but its free administration may cause central adverse effects. AEA controlled release by nanoformulations could reduce/eliminate its side effects. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of nanoformulated AEA (nf-AEA) on systolic blood pressure (SBP), behavior, and central/peripheral inflammatory, oxidative, and apoptotic state in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). MATERIALS/METHODS: Male rats were used, both Wistar Kyoto (WKY) and SHR (n â€‹= â€‹10 per group), with/without treatment with nf-AEA (obtained by electrospraying) at a weekly dose of 5 â€‹mg/kg IP for 4 weeks. SBP was measured and behavioral tests were performed. Inflammatory/oxidative markers were quantified at the central (brain cortex) and peripheral (serum) level. RESULTS: SHR showed hyperactivity, low anxiety, and high concentrations of central/peripheral inflammatory/oxidative markers, also higher apoptosis of brain cortical cells compared to WKY. As opposed to this group, treatment with nf-AEA in SHR significantly reduced SBP, peripheral/central inflammatory/oxidative makers, and central apoptosis. Nf-AEA also increased neuroprotective mechanisms mediated by intracellular heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70), which were attenuated in untreated SHR. Additionally, nf-AEA reversed the abnormal behaviors observed in SHR without producing central adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest protective properties of nf-AEA, both peripherally and centrally, through a signaling pathway that would involve the type I angiotensin II receptor, Wilms tumor transcription factor 1, Hsp70, and iNOS. Considering non-nf-AEA limitations, this nanoformulation could contribute to the development of new antihypertensive and behavioral disorder treatments associated with neuroinflammation.

Effectiveness of chlorthalidone/amiloride versus losartan in patients with stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus: results from the PREVER-treatment randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: To compare the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of a chlorthalidone/amiloride combination pill with losartan, during initial management of JNC 7 Stage I hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: In an a priori subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, volunteers aged 30-70 years, with stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus, were randomized to 12.5/2.5 mg of chlorthalidone/amiloride (N = 47) or 50 mg of losartan (N = 50), and followed for 18 months in 21 clinical centers. If BP remained uncontrolled after three months, study medication dose was doubled, and if uncontrolled after six months, amlodipine (5 and 10 mg) and propranolol (40 and 80 mg BID) were added as open label drugs in a progressive fashion. RESULTS: Systolic BP decreased to a greater extent in participants allocated to diuretics compared to losartan (P < 0.001). After 18 months of follow-up, systolic BP was 128.4 ± 10.3 mmHg in the diuretic group versus 133.5 ± 8.0 in the losartan group (P < 0.01). In the diuretic group, 36 out of 43 participants (83.7%) had a JNC 7 normal BP, compared to 31/47 (66%) in the losartan group (P = 0.089). Serum cholesterol was higher in the diuretic arm at the end of the trial. Other biochemical parameters and reports of adverse events did not differ by treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of hypertension based on a combination of chlorthalidone and amiloride is more effective for BP lowering compared to losartan in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials registration number: NCT00971165.

CARVEDILOL AS PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS FOR GASTRIC VARICEAL BLEEDING IN PORTAL HYPERTENSION MODEL IN RATS.

BACKGROUND: Portal hypertension (PH) can be measured indirectly through a hepatic vein pressure gradient greater than 5 mmHg. Cirrhosis is the leading cause for PH and can present as complications ascites, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, and esophagogastric varices, characterizing gastropathy. AIM: To evaluate the use of carvedilol as primary prophylaxis in the development of collateral circulation in rats submitted to the partial portal vein ligament (PPVL) model. METHOD: This is a combined qualitative and quantitative experimental study in which 32 Wistar rats were divided into four groups (8 animals in each): group I - cirrhosis + carvedilol (PPVL + C); group II - cirrhosis + vehicle (PPVL); group III - control + carvedilol (SO-sham-operated + C); group IV - control + vehicle (SO-sham-operated). After seven days of the surgical procedure (PPVL or sham), carvedilol (10 mg/kg) or vehicle (1 mL normal saline) were administered to the respective groups daily for seven days. RESULTS: The histological analysis showed no hepatic alteration in any group and a decrease in edema and vasodilatation in the PPVL + C group. The laboratory evaluation of liver function did not show a statistically significant change between the groups. CONCLUSION: Carvedilol was shown to have a positive effect on gastric varices without significant adverse effects.

Informe de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias: Estudio de costo-efectividad del tratamiento farmacológico combinado en dosis fijas para la hipertensión arterial en Chile / Health Technology Evaluation Report: Cost-effectiveness study of combined pharmacological treatment in fixed doses for arterial hypertension in Chile

ANTECEDENTES: La hipertensión arterial, con su alta prevalencia nacional, constituye una preocupación creciente para la salud pública. Por otro lado, cualquier modificación a las directrices de tratamiento puede implicar un alto impacto presupuestario. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la costo-efectividad del tratamiento farmacológico de la hipertensión arterial en combinaciones a dosis fijas en relación al tratamiento habitual (no combinado), desde la perspectiva del sistema público de salud chileno. METODOLOGÍA: Se definió un modelo de Markov de ocho estados de salud, con ciclos anuales y probabilidades de transición dependientes del tiempo. El modelo, desarrollado en lenguaje de programación R, simula la sobrevida de una cohorte de pacientes de 45 años de edad, en tratamiento por hipertensión arterial esencial y sin antecedentes de eventos cardiovasculares previos. Se evalúa la mortalidad específica por infarto agudo al miocardio, insuficiencia cardíaca y accidente cerebrovascular. Se usan los años de vida ajustados por calidad (QALY) como medida de outcomes (efectos) final. El modelo se pobló con evidencia disponible identificada tanto a nivel nacional como internacional. Los costos (descontados al 3% al igual que los efectos), se obtuvieron del Estudio de Verificación de Costos del GES complementando con microcosteo para las patologías no cubiertas. RESULTADOS: Dado que no se encontró evidencia de mayor efectividad en favor de la terapia combinada por sobre la no combinada, se consideró que la mayor adherencia asociada a la terapia combinada en un solo comprimido se traduce en una mayor proporción de pacientes con presión arterial controlada. Se obtuvo un costo adicional por QALY ganado (ICER) positivo que cae dentro del cuadrante noreste del plano de costo-efectividad, sugiriendo que la intervención es más cara y levemente más efectiva. Los resultados obtenidos no son favorables para la terapia combinada en un solo comprimido (al compararla con un umbral de costo-efectividad de un PIB per cápita nacional). Lo anterior se explica principalmente por el mayor costo de la terapia combinada en dosis fija y la baja efectividad incremental estimada. Los resultados se mantuvieron estables tanto en el análisis de sensibilidad determinístico como probabilístico, siendo el precio de los medicamentos y el incremento de la adherencia de parámetros que más influyen en el resultado. CONCLUSIONES: La terapia combinada a dosis fija no es una alternativa costo-efectiva al compararla con el manejo farmacológico actual de pacientes con hipertensión esencial en Chile. Esta condición es susceptible de cambiar favorablemente en la medida que baje el precio de los medicamentos (por ejemplo, con la entrada de genéricos en este mercado) y mejore la adherencia de pacientes, lo que debería implementarse en el marco de un programa más integral o estandarizado del manejo de la presión arterial en Chile.

Determination of l-(+)-bornesitol, the hypotensive constituent of Hancornia speciosa, in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS and its application on a pharmacokinetic study.

Hancornia speciosa is a medicinal plant with proven antihypertensive activity. The cyclitol l-(+)-bornesitol is the main constituent of its leaves and is a potent inhibitor of the angiotensin-converting enzyme. We herein investigated the pharmacokinetic properties of bornesitol administered orally to Wistar rats, as well as bornesitol permeation in Caco-2 cells. Bornesitol was isolated and purified from an ethanol extract of H. speciosa leaves. An ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-MS/MS) method was developed and validated to quantify bornesitol in rat plasma based on Multiple Reaction Monitoring, using pentaerythritol as an internal standard. Pharmacokinetics was evaluated by the administration of single doses via intravenous in bolus (3 mg/kg) and gavage (3, 15 and 25 mg/kg). Bornesitol permeation was assayed in a transwell Caco-2 cells model, tested alone, or combined with rutin, or as a constituent of H. speciosa extract, using a developed and validated UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method. All assayed validation parameters (selectivity, residual effect, matrix effect, linearity, precision, accuracy and stability of analyte in plasma and solution) for the bioanalytical method met the acceptance criteria established by regulatory guidelines. Bornestiol reached peak plasma concentration within approximately 60 min after oral administration with a half-life ranging from 72.15 min to 123.69 min. The peak concentration and area under the concentration-time curve of bornesitol did not rise proportionally with the increasing doses, suggesting a non-linear pharmacokinetics in rats and the oral bioavailability ranged from 28.5%-59.3%. Bornesitol showed low permeability in Caco-2 cells, but the permeability apparently increased when it was administered either combined with rutin or as a constituent of H. speciosa extract. In conclusion, bornesitol was rapidly absorbed after a single oral administration to rats and followed a non-linear pharmacokinetics. The obtained data will be useful to guide further pre-clinical development of bornesitol-containing herbal preparations of H. speciosa as an antihypertensive agent.

Hypertensive Emergency in a Woman with Systemic Sclerosis.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease that causes fibrosis in the skin and subcutaneous tissue, involving other organs such as the heart, lungs, kidneys, and gastrointestinal tract. Additionally, it can cause pulmonary arterial hypertension. Scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) is one of the most dreadful complications of SSc. SRC is a medical emergency that can present as a clinical picture of hypertensive encephalopathy. The pathophysiology involves an abrupt onset of moderate to severe hypertension that ranges from days to weeks; it is associated with an increase in plasma renin activity and acute kidney injury. It is known that by introducing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, the mortality decreases significantly in SRC. The renal biopsy plays an important role on the diagnosis and opportune treatment. We present a clinical case of SRC with a typical presentation of hypertensive emergency and acute kidney injury.

Considerations on the use of antihypertensive blockers of the renin-angiotensin system in adults and children in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic.

As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular comorbidities develop more severe coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 and are at high risk of death, a controversy arose about the use of antihypertensives as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). Such drugs might increase the expression of the fundamental receptor of this new infectious agent: the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Preclinical observations indicate that the increase of ACE2 expression or the activity by ACEis and ARBs leads to a greater transformation of angiotensin (Ang)-II to Ang-(1-7), which is associated with positive effects on cardiovascular and pulmonary pathophysiology. This association has been demonstrated in observational studies in patients with cardiovascular pathology and pneumonia. It has not been possible to confirm whether users of ACEis or ARBs are more infected by the new coronavirus, due to methodological issues in studies with patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. However, the use of such antihypertensive treatments in both children and adults might reduce the virulence of infection. Therefore, changes in the antihypertensive therapy of patients at risk of contracting COVID-19 are not recommended.

Los pacientes con hipertensión y otra comorbilidad cardiovascular infectados con SARS-CoV-2 desarrollan cuadros más graves de COVID-19 y con mayor frecuencia fallecen. Este hecho ha originado una controversia acerca del uso de antihipertensivos inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de la angiotensina (IECA) y de antagonistas de los receptores de la angiotensina II (ARA-II), pues tales medicamentos pueden incrementar la expresión del receptor funcional de este nuevo agente infeccioso: la enzima convertidora de la angiotensina 2 (ECA2). Las observaciones preclínicas indican que el aumento de la expresión o de la actividad de la ECA2 por uso de IECA o ARA-II conduce a una mayor transformación de angiotensina 2 a a angiotensina 1-7, la cual se asocia con efectos positivos sobre la fisiopatología pulmonar y cardiovascular. En estudios observacionales de pacientes con patología cardiovascular y neumonía se ha confirmado esta asociación. La falta de evidencia contundente debida a aspectos metodológicos en estudios con pacientes infectados con SARS-CoV-2 no permite confirmar si los usuarios de IECA o ARA-II se contagian más con el nuevo coronavirus. Sin embargo, continuar con tales medicamentos antihipertensivos, tanto en adultos como en niños, podría reducir la virulencia de la infección. Por ello, no se recomienda cambiar la terapia antihipertensiva en los pacientes susceptibles a la COVID-19.

Considerations on the use of antihypertensive blockers of the renin-angiotensin system in adults and children in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic / Consideraciones sobre el uso de antihipertensivos bloqueadores del sistema renina-angiotensina en adultos y niños ante la pandemia de COVID-19

Abstract As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular comorbidities develop more severe coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 and are at high risk of death, a controversy arose about the use of antihypertensives as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). Such drugs might increase the expression of the fundamental receptor of this new infectious agent: the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Preclinical observations indicate that the increase of ACE2 expression or the activity by ACEis and ARBs leads to a greater transformation of angiotensin (Ang)-II to Ang-(1-7), which is associated with positive effects on cardiovascular and pulmonary pathophysiology. This association has been demonstrated in observational studies in patients with cardiovascular pathology and pneumonia. It has not been possible to confirm whether users of ACEis or ARBs are more infected by the new coronavirus, due to methodological issues in studies with patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. However, the use of such antihypertensive treatments in both children and adults might reduce the virulence of infection. Therefore, changes in the antihypertensive therapy of patients at risk of contracting COVID-19 are not recommended.

Resumen Los pacientes con hipertensión y otra comorbilidad cardiovascular infectados con SARS-CoV-2 desarrollan cuadros más graves de COVID-19 y con mayor frecuencia fallecen. Este hecho ha originado una controversia acerca del uso de antihipertensivos inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de la angiotensina (IECA) y de antagonistas de los receptores de la angiotensina II (ARA-II), pues tales medicamentos pueden incrementar la expresión del receptor funcional de este nuevo agente infeccioso: la enzima convertidora de la angiotensina 2 (ECA2). Las observaciones preclínicas indican que el aumento de la expresión o de la actividad de la ECA2 por uso de IECA o ARA-II conduce a una mayor transformación de angiotensina 2 a a angiotensina 1-7, la cual se asocia con efectos positivos sobre la fisiopatología pulmonar y cardiovascular. En estudios observacionales de pacientes con patología cardiovascular y neumonía se ha confirmado esta asociación. La falta de evidencia contundente debida a aspectos metodológicos en estudios con pacientes infectados con SARS-CoV-2 no permite confirmar si los usuarios de IECA o ARA-II se contagian más con el nuevo coronavirus. Sin embargo, continuar con tales medicamentos antihipertensivos, tanto en adultos como en niños, podría reducir la virulencia de la infección. Por ello, no se recomienda cambiar la terapia antihipertensiva en los pacientes susceptibles a la COVID-19.

Effects of Oral Sodium Nitrite on Blood Pressure, Insulin Sensitivity, and Intima-Media Arterial Thickening in Adults With Hypertension and Metabolic Syndrome.

The nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway regulates NO synthase-independent vasodilation and NO signaling. Ingestion of inorganic nitrite has vasodilatory and blood pressure-lowering effects. Preclinical studies in rodent models suggest there may be a benefit of nitrite in lowering serum triglyceride levels and improving the metabolic syndrome. In a phase 2 study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of chronic oral nitrite therapy in patients with hypertension and the metabolic syndrome. Twenty adult subjects with stage 1 or 2 hypertension and the metabolic syndrome were enrolled in an open-label safety and efficacy study. The primary efficacy end point was blood pressure reduction; secondary end points included insulin-dependent glucose disposal and endothelial function measured by flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery and intima-media diameter of the carotid artery. Chronic oral nitrite therapy (40 mg/3× daily) was well tolerated. Oral nitrite significantly lowered systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, but tolerance was observed after 10 to 12 weeks of therapy. There was significant improvement in the intima-media thickness of the carotid artery and trends toward improvements in flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery and insulin sensitivity. Chronic oral nitrite therapy is safe in patients with hypertension and the metabolic syndrome. Despite an apparent lack of enzymatic tolerance to nitrite, we observed tolerance after 10 weeks of chronic therapy, which requires additional mechanistic studies and possible therapeutic dose titration in clinical trials. Nitrite may be a safe therapy to concominantly improve multiple features of the metabolic syndrome including hypertension, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01681810.