Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 1.892
1.
Clin Transl Sci ; 17(6): e13825, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38808543

Mosunetuzumab (Mosun) is a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody that redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells. The approved step-up dose regimen of 1/2/60/30 mg IV is designed to mitigate cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and maximize efficacy in early cycles. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was developed from 439 patients with relapsed/refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving Mosun IV monotherapy, including fixed dosing (0.05-2.8 mg IV every 3 weeks (q3w)) and Cycle 1 step-up dosing groups (0.4/1/2.8-1/2/60/30 mg IV q3w). Prior to Mosun treatment, ~50% of patients had residual levels of anti-CD20 drugs (e.g., rituximab or obinutuzumab) from prior treatment. CD20 receptor binding dynamics and rituximab/obinutuzumab PK were incorporated into the model to calculate the Mosun CD20 receptor occupancy percentage (RO%) over time. A two-compartment model with time-dependent clearance (CL) best described the data. The typical patient had an initial CL of 1.08 L/day, transitioning to a steady-state CL of 0.584 L/day. Statistically relevant covariates on PK parameters included body weight, albumin, sex, tumor burden, and baseline anti-CD20 drug concentration; no covariate was found to have a clinically relevant impact on exposure at the approved dose. Mosun CD20 RO% was highly variable, attributed to the large variability in residual baseline anti-CD20 drug concentration (median = 10 µg/mL). The 60 mg loading doses increased Mosun CD20 RO% in Cycle 1, providing efficacious exposures in the presence of the competing anti-CD20 drugs. PopPK model simulations, investigating Mosun dose delays, informed treatment resumption protocols to ensure CRS mitigation.


Antibodies, Bispecific , Antigens, CD20 , Lymphoma, B-Cell , Humans , Antigens, CD20/immunology , Antigens, CD20/metabolism , Middle Aged , Male , Aged , Lymphoma, B-Cell/drug therapy , Lymphoma, B-Cell/immunology , Female , Adult , Antibodies, Bispecific/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Bispecific/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Bispecific/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Aged, 80 and over , Models, Biological , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Young Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Rituximab/pharmacokinetics , Rituximab/administration & dosage
2.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 24(5): 613-629, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38738869

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of economic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, early-stage breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-containing regimens, by focusing on both Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases without language or publication year restrictions. Two independent reviewers screened eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed methodology and reporting quality using the Drummond checklist and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022), respectively. Costs were converted to US dollars (US$) for 2023 for cross-study comparison. RESULTS: Twenty-two articles, primarily from high-income countries (HICs), were included, with ICERs ranging from US$13,176/QALY to US$254,510/QALY, falling within country-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds. A notable association was observed between higher QALYs and lower ICERs, indicating a favorable cost-effectiveness and health outcome relationship. EQ-5D was the most utilized instrument for assessing health state utility values, with diverse targeted populations. CONCLUSIONS: Studies reporting higher QALYs tend to have lower ICERs, indicating a positive relationship between cost-effectiveness and health outcomes. However, challenges such as methodological heterogeneity and transparency in utility valuation persist, underscoring the need for standardized guidelines and collaborative efforts among stakeholders. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID: CRD42021259826.


Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Breast Neoplasms , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Neoplasm Staging , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Trastuzumab , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Trastuzumab/administration & dosage , Trastuzumab/economics , Female , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/economics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Developed Countries
3.
J Med Case Rep ; 18(1): 257, 2024 May 23.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778387

BACKGROUND: Mucosal melanoma, an aggressive type of malignancy different from the cutaneous melanomas commonly seen in the head and neck region, represents < 1% of all malignant melanomas. The pathogenesis of mucosal melanoma is unknown. Targetable mutations commonly seen in cutaneous melanoma, such as in the BRAF and NRAS genes, have a lower incidence in mucosal melanoma. Mucosal melanoma carries a distinct mutational pattern from cutaneous melanoma. Surgery with negative margins is the first-line treatment for mucosal melanoma, and systemic therapy is not well defined. Talimogene laherparepvec, an oncolytic viral immunotherapy, is United States Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of advanced malignant cutaneous melanoma, with local therapeutic benefits. Mucosal melanoma was initially excluded from talimogene laherparepvec's initial phase III clinical trial. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a white female patient in her 40s with past medical history of systemic lupus erythematous, scleroderma, and estrogen-receptor-positive invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Following a bilateral mastectomy, the patient was found to have BRAF-negative mucosal melanoma of her hard palate with a soft palate skip lesion. Owing to the presence of a skip mucosal lesion as well as the anticipated defect and need for free-flap reconstructive surgery, nonsurgical management was considered. The patient was referred to medical oncology, where-based on the patient's complicated medical history and the risk of immunotherapy possibly worsening her prior autoimmune diseases-local talimogene laherparepvec injections were chosen as the primary therapy for her mucosal lesions. Though talimogene laherparepvec is approved for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma, there are limited data available on the use of talimogene laherparepvec in mucosal melanomas. CONCLUSION: The patient had a complete local tumor response at both the primary lesion as well as the skip lesion with the local injections. She had no side effects and maintained a high quality of life during treatment.


Biological Products , Melanoma , Humans , Melanoma/therapy , Female , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Biological Products/administration & dosage , Adult , Herpesvirus 1, Human/genetics , Mouth Mucosa/pathology , Injections, Intralesional , Treatment Outcome , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Palatal Neoplasms/therapy
4.
N Engl J Med ; 390(19): 1756-1769, 2024 May 16.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749033

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves outcomes in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Perioperative treatment (i.e., neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy) with nivolumab may further improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned adults with resectable stage IIA to IIIB NSCLC to receive neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus placebo every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant nivolumab or placebo every 4 weeks for 1 year. The primary outcome was event-free survival according to blinded independent review. Secondary outcomes were pathological complete response and major pathological response according to blinded independent review, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: At this prespecified interim analysis (median follow-up, 25.4 months), the percentage of patients with 18-month event-free survival was 70.2% in the nivolumab group and 50.0% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or recurrence, abandoned surgery, or death, 0.58; 97.36% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.81; P<0.001). A pathological complete response occurred in 25.3% of the patients in the nivolumab group and in 4.7% of those in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 6.64; 95% CI, 3.40 to 12.97); a major pathological response occurred in 35.4% and 12.1%, respectively (odds ratio, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.48 to 6.49). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 32.5% of the patients in the nivolumab group and in 25.2% of those in the chemotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative treatment with nivolumab resulted in significantly longer event-free survival than chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. No new safety signals were observed. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; CheckMate 77T ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04025879.).


Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Nivolumab , Humans , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Progression-Free Survival , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Staging , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Pneumonectomy
5.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0300171, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701062

PURPOSE: To investigate the treatment efficacy of intra-arterial (IA) trastuzumab treatment using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a human breast cancer xenograft model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human breast cancer cells (BT474) were stereotaxically injected into the brains of nude mice to obtain a xenograft model. The mice were divided into four groups and subjected to different treatments (IA treatment [IA-T], intravenous treatment [IV-T], IA saline injection [IA-S], and the sham control group). MRI was performed before and at 7 and 14 d after treatment to assess the efficacy of the treatment. The tumor volume, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters (Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and Vp) were measured. RESULTS: Tumor volumes in the IA-T group at 14 d after treatment were significantly lower than those in the IV-T group (13.1 mm3 [interquartile range 8.48-16.05] vs. 25.69 mm3 [IQR 20.39-30.29], p = 0.005), control group (IA-S, 33.83 mm3 [IQR 32.00-36.30], p<0.01), and sham control (39.71 mm3 [IQR 26.60-48.26], p <0.001). The ADC value in the IA-T group was higher than that in the control groups (IA-T, 7.62 [IQR 7.23-8.20] vs. IA-S, 6.77 [IQR 6.48-6.87], p = 0.044 and vs. sham control, 6.89 [IQR 4.93-7.48], p = 0.004). Ktrans was significantly decreased following the treatment compared to that in the control groups (p = 0.002 and p<0.001 for vs. IA-S and sham control, respectively). Tumor growth was decreased in the IV-T group compared to that in the sham control group (25.69 mm3 [IQR 20.39-30.29] vs. 39.71 mm3 [IQR 26.60-48.26], p = 0.27); there was no significant change in the MRI parameters. CONCLUSION: IA treatment with trastuzumab potentially affects the early response to treatment, including decreased tumor growth and decrease of Ktrans, in a preclinical brain tumor model.


Breast Neoplasms , Injections, Intra-Arterial , Mice, Nude , Trastuzumab , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Trastuzumab/administration & dosage , Trastuzumab/pharmacology , Trastuzumab/therapeutic use , Animals , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Mice , Cell Line, Tumor , Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Tumor Burden/drug effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Mice, Inbred BALB C
6.
Recenti Prog Med ; 115(5): 1e-6e, 2024 May.
Article It | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708539

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-Hnscc) is a true therapeutical challenge in the modern era and the scientific community is trying to face this challenge with new therapeutical strategies, including combinations of monoclonal antibodies and radiation therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes in LA-Hnscc patients unfit to receive platinum-based chemotherapy, treated with concurrent simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy (Sib-Imrt) + cetuximab (Ctx) in daily clinical practice. METHODS: LA-Hnscc patients not included in other prospective studies treated in 4 Italian radiotherapy units (2 Messina, 1 Rome, and 1 Lecce) using Sib-Imrt and Ctx were included in this study. Acute and late toxicities and overall survival (OS) have been evaluated. RESULTS: Data regarding 27 patients with squamous tumour were collected and reviewed. The primary tumour sites were oropharynx in 14 patients (51.9%), oral cavity in 7 (25.9%), larynx in 3 (11%) and other sites in 3(11%). There were 20 (74%) patients had stage IV (16 IVa and 4 IVb). Complete remission was observed in 18 patients (66.7%), a partial remission in 4 (14.8%) whilst 4 had a progression disease (14.8%). After 3 year of follow-up 7/27 patients were deaths. The OS was 95.5%, 62.5% and 52.9% respectively at 1,2 and 3 years. Acute toxicities were observed in all treated patients (mucositis, dermatitis and dysphagia) while 66.7% of patients developed late toxicities. All observed toxicities were grade 1 to 3 and just 1 patient developed a G4 toxicity. CONCLUSION: The concurrent bio-radiotherapy of Sib-Imrt and cetuximab is feasible in real-life daily clinical practice for LA-Hnscc patients unfit for platinum-based chemoradiotherapy.


Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Cetuximab , Chemoradiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Humans , Cetuximab/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/radiotherapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Italy , Survival Rate , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Staging , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies
8.
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst ; 36(1): 14, 2024 May 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38705953

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab (Nivo) and ipilimumab (Ipi) have revolutionized cancer treatment by targeting different pathways. Their combination shows promising results in various cancers, including melanoma, but not all studies have demonstrated significant benefits. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness and safety of Nivo-Ipi compared to Nivo alone in advanced cancer types (excluding melanoma). METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a meta-analysis up to September 30, 2023, searching databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We focused on advanced solid malignancies (excluding melanoma) with specific Nivo and Ipi dosing. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), grades 3-4 adverse events (AEs), and treatment-related discontinuations. Secondary outcomes included specific adverse events. Statistical analysis in Review Manager included hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio (RR), assessing heterogeneity (Higgins I2). RESULTS: Nine RCTs, involving 2152 patients covering various malignancies, were analyzed. The Nivo plus Ipi group exhibited a median OS of 12.3 months and a median PFS of 3.73 months, compared to monotherapy with 11.67 months and 3.98 months, respectively. OS showed no significant difference between Nivo and Ipi combination and Nivo alone (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.08, p = 0.61). PFS had a slight improvement with combination therapy (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.00, p = 0.04). Treatment-related cumulative grades 3-4 adverse events were higher with Nivo and Ipi (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.78, p < 0.00001), as were treatment-related discontinuations (RR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.46 to 2.70, p < 0.0001). Hepatotoxicity (RR = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.39 to 4.24, p = 0.002), GI toxicity (RR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.44 to 5.59, p = 0.002), pneumonitis (RR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.24 to 2.23, p = 0.008), dermatitis (RR = 2.96, 95% CI: 1.08 to 8.14, p = 0.04), and endocrine dysfunction (RR = 6.22, 95% CI: 2.31 to 16.71, p = 0.0003) were more frequent with Nivo and Ipi. CONCLUSIONS: Combining nivolumab and ipilimumab did not significantly improve overall survival compared to nivolumab alone in advanced cancers (except melanoma). However, it did show slightly better PFS at the cost of increased toxicity, particularly grades 3-4 adverse events. Specific AEs occurred more frequently in the combination group. Further trials are needed to fully assess this combination in treating advanced cancers.


Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Ipilimumab , Neoplasms , Nivolumab , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Ipilimumab/administration & dosage , Ipilimumab/adverse effects , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/pathology , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Progression-Free Survival , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
9.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 23(6): 667-675, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676380

INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains poor and few effective drugs are available. Cisplatin plus 5-FU (CF) has been the standard first-line treatment for advanced ESCC. However, in the KEYNOTE-181 trial, the clinical outcomes were better in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced ESCC who received pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), than in those who received cytotoxic agents as second-line treatment. Moreover, the KEYNOTE-590 trial demonstrated the superiority of pembrolizumab plus CF over CF alone in terms of overall survival. Based on the results of KEYNOTE-590, pembrolizumab plus CF has become one of the standard treatments for advanced ESCC. However, the safety profile of ICI-containing therapy is different from that of conventional cytotoxic agents. AREAS COVERED: Safety of pembrolizumab-containing therapies in patients with advanced ESCC. EXPERT OPINION: Pembrolizumab-containing therapies are tolerable as first- and second-line treatments in patients with advanced ESCC. Although infrequent, immune-related adverse events may occur in patients on pembrolizumab-containing therapies. These events are potentially fatal and require treatment with steroids or immunosuppressive drugs. Regular physical and laboratory examinations, including measurement of hormone levels, are needed during and after pembrolizumab-containing therapies in clinical practice.


Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/drug therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prognosis , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Survival Rate , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects
10.
Lancet Oncol ; 25(5): 572-587, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561010

BACKGROUND: Despite multimodal therapy, 5-year overall survival for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is about 50%. We assessed the addition of pembrolizumab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced HNSCC. METHODS: In the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-412 trial, participants with newly diagnosed, high-risk, unresected locally advanced HNSCC from 130 medical centres globally were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab (200 mg) plus chemoradiotherapy or placebo plus chemoradiotherapy. Randomisation was done using an interactive response technology system and was stratified by investigator's choice of radiotherapy regimen, tumour site and p16 status, and disease stage, with participants randomly assigned in blocks of four per stratum. Participants, investigators, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignments. Local pharmacists were aware of assignments to support treatment preparation. Pembrolizumab and placebo were administered intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 17 doses (one before chemoradiotherapy, two during chemoradiotherapy, 14 as maintenance therapy). Chemoradiotherapy included cisplatin (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously once every 3 weeks for two or three doses and accelerated or standard fractionation radiotherapy (70 Gy delivered in 35 fractions). The primary endpoint was event-free survival analysed in all randomly assigned participants. Safety was analysed in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03040999, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between April 19, 2017, and May 2, 2019, 804 participants were randomly assigned to the pembrolizumab group (n=402) or the placebo group (n=402). 660 (82%) of 804 participants were male, 144 (18%) were female, and 622 (77%) were White. Median study follow-up was 47·7 months (IQR 42·1-52·3). Median event-free survival was not reached (95% CI 44·7 months-not reached) in the pembrolizumab group and 46·6 months (27·5-not reached) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·83 [95% CI 0·68-1·03]; log-rank p=0·043 [significance threshold, p≤0·024]). 367 (92%) of 398 participants treated in the pembrolizumab group and 352 (88%) of 398 participants treated in the placebo group had grade 3 or worse adverse events. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (108 [27%] of 398 participants in the pembrolizumab group vs 100 [25%] of 398 participants in the placebo group), stomatitis (80 [20%] vs 69 [17%]), anaemia (80 [20%] vs 61 [15%]), dysphagia (76 [19%] vs 62 [16%]), and decreased lymphocyte count (76 [19%] vs 81 [20%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 245 (62%) participants in the pembrolizumab group versus 197 (49%) participants in the placebo group, most commonly pneumonia (43 [11%] vs 25 [6%]), acute kidney injury (33 [8%] vs 30 [8%]), and febrile neutropenia (24 [6%] vs seven [2%]). Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (1%) participants in the pembrolizumab group (one participant each from aspiration pneumonia, end-stage renal disease, pneumonia, and sclerosing cholangitis) and six (2%) participants in the placebo group (three participants from pharyngeal haemorrhage and one participant each from mouth haemorrhage, post-procedural haemorrhage, and sepsis). INTERPRETATION: Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy did not significantly improve event-free survival compared with chemoradiotherapy alone in a molecularly unselected, locally advanced HNSCC population. No new safety signals were seen. Locally advanced HNSCC remains a challenging disease that requires better treatment approaches. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.


Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Chemoradiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/mortality , Male , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/mortality , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Progression-Free Survival , Adult
11.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm ; 199: 114295, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636881

Postproduction handling of drug products during preparation or clinical use may affect the structure and efficacy of the drug and perhaps remain unnoticed. Since chemical modifications can impact the product's structure, stability, and biological activity, this study investigates the impact of elevated temperature and subtle shift in pH on the drug product post-dilution in saline. The mAb sample diluted in saline for administration was stressed at elevated temperature and slightly acidic pH condition. Extended stability studies were performed and monitored for size and charge heterogeneity. Size heterogeneity shows no significant changes, whereas charge heterogeneity shows an increase in basic variants and a reduction in main species. Further, basic variants were isolated and characterized to identify the type and site of chemical modification. Intact mass analysis and peptide mapping identify that the basic variants were attributed mainly to the isomerization of HC Asp102 into iso-Asp or its succinimide intermediate. Four basic variants were found to exhibit similar structural properties as the main and control samples. However, basic variants showed reduced binding affinity to HER2 receptor, while there was no significant difference in FcRn binding. The results indicate that modification in the HC Asp102, which is present in the CDR, affects antigen binding and thus can influence the potency of the drug product. Hence, with the conventional stability studies required to license the drug product, including in-use or extended stability studies to mimic the postproduction handling would be desirable.


Drug Stability , Saline Solution , Trastuzumab , Trastuzumab/chemistry , Saline Solution/chemistry , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Humans , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Temperature
12.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 24(5): 253-261, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38594892

INTRODUCTION: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has changed the landscape in the treatment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The ICI pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy now forms a standard of care for the treatment of advanced PD-L1 positive TNBC and as part of neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk early-stage disease. Evidence in this space is rapidly advancing. AREAS COVERED: This review aims to highlight the evolving role of immunotherapy in TNBC management and to discuss current challenges. The studies in this review were searched from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. EXPERT OPINION: The KEYNOTE-522 trial demonstrated that the addition of peri-operative pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves patient outcomes in early-stage TNBC. However, critical questions remain including how to select which patients truly gain benefit from the addition of pembrolizumab; the optimal duration of therapy, and the optimal adjuvant therapy depending on pathologic response.


Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Female , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Staging , Immunotherapy/methods , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Patient Selection , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
13.
In Vivo ; 38(3): 1338-1350, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688599

BACKGROUND/AIM: Over the past several decades, new anti-cancer drugs have been developed for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. The development of drugs has led to changes in improving the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. One of these drugs, bevacizumab, is used for advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate survival improvement in patients with platinum-resistant relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (PR-ROC) after introduction of bevacizumab in real world experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively divided patients with PR-ROC into two groups: bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (BEV-CT group) and chemotherapy alone (CT group). Progression-free survival (PFS), the primary endpoint, between two groups was compared to evaluate whether survival outcomes were improved. In addition, overall survival (OS) was also compared. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were included in the study: 57 and 97 patients in the BEV-CT and CT groups, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the BEV-CT group than in the CT group. The use of bevacizumab was identified as a favorable prognostic factor for OS. In a subgroup analysis confined to second-line chemotherapy, PFS and OS were statistically different between groups. More patients in the CT group suffered hematologic adverse events of grade 3 or above than patients in the BEV-CT group. CONCLUSION: In a real-world clinical setting, introduction of bevacizumab led to improvement of OS in patients with PR-ROC with a tolerable toxicity.


Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Bevacizumab , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Female , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/mortality , Platinum/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage
14.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 149: 105616, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561147

Pharmacokinetic (PK) models are increasingly submitted to the FDA to support first-in-human (FIH) dose selection of immune-oncology products. To examine whether a simple PK modeling (SPM) using clearance for scaling was acceptable for dose estimation, FIH(SPM) doses were computed and compared to doses that were safely administered to patients. We concluded that the SPM approach is acceptable in FIH dose estimation, but the variables should be carefully selected for CD3 constructs. For CD3 constructs, use of 60 kg BWh, a clearance exponent of 0.75, and a targeted plasma concentration based on relevant and/or sensitive activity assays was an acceptable approach for FIH dose selection; use of 0.85 as the scaling factor is questionable at this time as it resulted in a FIH dose that was too close to the AHD for one product (7%). Immune activating mAbs were not sensitive to changes in the clearance exponent (0.75-0.85) or body weight (60-70 kg). For PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs, using products' in vitro EC50 in the model resulted in suboptimal FIH doses and clinical data of closely related products informed FIH dose selection. PK models submitted by sponsors were diverse in methods, assumptions, and variables, and the resulting FIH doses were not always optimal.


Models, Biological , Humans , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , B7-H1 Antigen/immunology , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunology , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , CD3 Complex/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/blood
15.
N Engl J Med ; 390(15): 1359-1371, 2024 Apr 18.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631003

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy after surgery for renal-cell carcinoma was approved on the basis of a significant improvement in disease-free survival in the KEYNOTE-564 trial. Whether the results regarding overall survival from the third prespecified interim analysis of the trial would also favor pembrolizumab was uncertain. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) participants with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had an increased risk of recurrence after surgery to receive pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 17 cycles (approximately 1 year) or until recurrence, the occurrence of unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. A significant improvement in disease-free survival according to investigator assessment (the primary end point) was shown previously. Overall survival was the key secondary end point. Safety was a secondary end point. RESULTS: A total of 496 participants were assigned to receive pembrolizumab and 498 to receive placebo. As of September 15, 2023, the median follow-up was 57.2 months. The disease-free survival benefit was consistent with that in previous analyses (hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.87). A significant improvement in overall survival was observed with pembrolizumab as compared with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.87; P = 0.005). The estimated overall survival at 48 months was 91.2% in the pembrolizumab group, as compared with 86.0% in the placebo group; the benefit was consistent across key subgroups. Pembrolizumab was associated with a higher incidence of serious adverse events of any cause (20.7%, vs. 11.5% with placebo) and of grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to pembrolizumab or placebo (18.6% vs. 1.2%). No deaths were attributed to pembrolizumab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant pembrolizumab was associated with a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival, as compared with placebo, among participants with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at increased risk for recurrence after surgery. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck; KEYNOTE-564 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03142334.).


Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects , Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Double-Blind Method , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Disease-Free Survival , Combined Modality Therapy , Survival Analysis
16.
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet ; 49(3): 383-392, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38564097

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: GB221 is a recombinant humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, safety, and immunogenicity of GB221 in healthy Chinese adults in comparison to trastuzumab (Herceptin®). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group phase I clinical trial, 88 subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive a single intravenous infusion (90-100 min) of GB221 or trastuzumab (6 mg/kg). The primary pharmacokinetic parameters-maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax), area under the serum concentration-time curve from zero to the last quantifiable concentration at time t (AUC0-t), and area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞)-of GB221 and trastuzumab were compared to establish whether the 90% confidence interval (CI) attained the 80-125% bioequivalence standard. Safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated. RESULTS: The GB221 group (n = 43) and the trastuzumab group (n = 44) showed similar pharmacokinetic characteristics. The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ between the two groups were 107.53% (102.25-113.07%), 108.31% (103.57-113.26%), and 108.34% (103.57-113.33%), respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 83.7% (36/43) of the subjects in the GB221 group and 95.5% (42/44) of the subjects in the trastuzumab group. No subjects withdrew from the trial due to TEAEs, and there were no occurrences of serious adverse events. All subjects tested negative for antidrug antibodies (ADA). CONCLUSION: GB221 demonstrated similar pharmacokinetics to trastuzumab and comparable safety and immunogenicity in healthy Chinese adults.


Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Area Under Curve , Therapeutic Equivalency , Trastuzumab , Humans , Trastuzumab/pharmacokinetics , Trastuzumab/administration & dosage , Trastuzumab/adverse effects , Adult , Male , Double-Blind Method , Female , Young Adult , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Asian People , Infusions, Intravenous , Middle Aged , Healthy Volunteers , Receptor, ErbB-2/immunology , East Asian People
17.
Bull Cancer ; 111(5): 441-451, 2024 May.
Article Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38480056

INTRODUCTION: Quality of life (QoL) and patient satisfaction are major concerns in oncology. METHODS: The aim of this prospective observational study was to evaluate these parameters according to the mode of administration of anti-HER2 (subcutaneous [SC] versus intravenous [IV]), the place of administration (Home Hospitalization or HOD versus hospital) for patients supervised by an advanced practice nurse (APN). RESULTS: Between January 2022 and June 2023, 32 patients were included. They were statistically more satisfied with subcutaneous management (P=0.0004), a result explained by the speed of administration (43.5%), comfort during administration (26%) even though some expressed pain on injection and felt less anxiety (26%). Management by the APN seems more appropriate when anti-HER2 drugs were administered in HOD. In HOD, patients perceived an overall improvement in their quality of life, appetite and cognitive abilities, with a reduction in fatigue, pain and depression (P<0.05). However, the rate of outsourcing to HOD remained too low (30.4%), as 56.3% of patients would have liked to be cared for in HOD if they had had the opportunity. CONCLUSION: SC administration of anti-HER2 under the supervision of an APN has advantages for the patient, resulting in greatest satisfaction and improved patient QOL, preferably in HOD.


Breast Neoplasms , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Receptor, ErbB-2/antagonists & inhibitors , Injections, Subcutaneous , Aged , Anxiety , Hospitalization , Adult , Trastuzumab/therapeutic use , Trastuzumab/administration & dosage , Depression , Fatigue , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Appetite/drug effects
18.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 50(6): 108265, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38493679

OBJECTIVE: ILP has shown to achieve high response rates in patients with melanoma ITM. Possibly there is a synergistic mechanism of action of ILP and anti-PD1. The aim of this trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of adding a single dose of systemic anti-PD1 to isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for patients with melanoma in-transit metastases (ITM). METHODS: In this placebo controlled double-blind phase Ib/II trial, patients with melanoma ITM were randomized 1:1 to either a single systemic dose of nivolumab or placebo one day prior to ILP. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate at three months, and safety in terms of incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included. AEs of any grade occurred in 90% of patients in the nivolumab arm and in 80% in the placebo arm within three months after ILP. Grade 3 AEs were reported in 40% and 30% respectively, most commonly related to wound infection, wound dehiscence, or skin necrosis. There were no grade 4 or 5 AEs reported. The CR rate was 75% in the nivolumab arm and 60% in the placebo arm. The 1-year local progression-free rate was 86% in the nivolumab arm and 67% in the placebo arm. The 1-year OS was 100% in both arms. CONCLUSION: For patients with melanoma ITM, the addition of a single systemic dose of nivolumab the day before ILP is considered safe and feasible with promising efficacy. Accrual will continue in a phase 2 trial.


Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion , Melanoma , Nivolumab , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/secondary , Melanoma/pathology , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion/methods , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Adult , Extremities , Aged, 80 and over
19.
J Dermatol ; 51(5): 632-642, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38529706

Pembrolizumab demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in Japanese patients with advanced melanoma in the phase 1b KEYNOTE-041 (Study of Pembrolizumab [MK-3475] in Participants With Advanced Melanoma) trial. To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with advanced melanoma in KEYNOTE-041. The current analysis reports results of additional follow-up of approximately 12 months since the initial analysis. Eligible patients had locally advanced (unresectable stage III) or metastatic (stage IV) melanoma not amenable to local therapy and had received two or fewer prior systemic therapies. Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg was given every 3 weeks for up to 2 years or until confirmed progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end points included safety, tolerability, and overall response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by independent central review. The data cutoff for this analysis was August 30, 2017. Forty-two patients were followed up for a median of 22.3 months (range, 2.63-30.82 months). The ORR was 24.3% (nine of 37 evaluable patients [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.8%-41.2%]). Two patients with partial response at the time of the initial analysis achieved complete response. The median overall survival (OS) was 25.1 months (95% CI, 13.1-not reached] and the 30-month OS rate was 46.3% (95% CI, 29.8%-61.3%). The median duration of response was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 78.6% of patients; the incidence of grade 3 to 5 TRAEs was 23.8%. No additional treatment-related deaths occurred since the initial analysis. Pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in Japanese patients with advanced melanoma.


Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Follow-Up Studies , Adult , Japan , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Staging , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , East Asian People
20.
Cancer Gene Ther ; 31(5): 766-777, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38480976

Trastuzumab improves overall survival for HER2+ breast cancer, but its short half-life in the cerebrospinal fluid (~2-4 days) and delivery limitations restrict the ability to target HER2+ central nervous system (CNS) disease. We developed an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector expressing a codon-optimized, ubiquitin C (UbC)-promoter-driven trastuzumab sequence (AAV9.UbC.trastuzumab) for intrathecal administration. Transgene expression was evaluated in adult Rag1 knockout mice and rhesus nonhuman primates (NHPs) after a single intracerebroventricular (ICV) or intra-cisterna magna (ICM) AAV9.UbC.trastuzumab injection, respectively, using real-time PCR, ELISA, Western blot, in situ hybridization, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; antitumor efficacy was evaluated in brain xenografts using HER2+ breast cancer cell lines (BT-474, MDA-MB-453). Transgene expression was detected in brain homogenates of Rag1 knockout mice following a single ICV injection of AAV9.UbC.trastuzumab (1 × 1011 vector genome copies [GC]/mouse) and tumor progression was inhibited in xenograft models of breast-to-brain metastasis. In NHPs, ICM delivery of AAV9.UbC.trastuzumab (3 × 1013 GC/animal) was well tolerated (36-37 days in-life) and resulted in transgene expression in CNS tissues and cerebrospinal fluid at levels sufficient to induce complete tumor remission in MDA-MB-453 brain xenografts. With AAV9's proven clinical safety record, this gene therapy may represent a viable approach for targeting HER2 + CNS malignancies.


Brain Neoplasms , Dependovirus , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Trastuzumab , Trastuzumab/administration & dosage , Trastuzumab/pharmacology , Trastuzumab/therapeutic use , Dependovirus/genetics , Animals , Humans , Mice , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Female , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Mice, Knockout , Genetic Vectors/administration & dosage , Genetic Vectors/genetics , Macaca mulatta , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Central Nervous System/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor
...