SAME day amBulatory c (SAMBA): a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: A recent meta-analysis concluded that outpatient appendectomy appears feasible and safe, but there is a lack of high-quality evidence and a randomized trial is needed. The aim of this trial is to demonstrate that outpatient appendectomy is non-inferior to conventional inpatient appendectomy in terms of overall morbi-mortality on the 30th postoperative day (D30). METHODS: SAMBA is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter non-inferiority trial. We will include 1400 patients admitted to 15 French hospitals between January 2023 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria are patients aged between 15 and 74 years presenting acute uncomplicated appendicitis suitable to be operated by laparoscopy. Patients will be randomized to receive outpatient care (day-surgery) or conventional inpatient care with overnight hospitalization in the surgery department. The primary outcome is postoperative morbi-mortality at D30. Secondary outcomes include time from diagnosis to appendectomy, length of total hospital stay, re-hospitalization, interventional radiology, re-interventions until D30, conversion from outpatient to inpatient, and quality of life and patient satisfaction using validated questionnaires. DISCUSSION: The SAMBA trial tests the hypothesis that outpatient surgery (i.e., without an overnight hospital stay) of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is a feasible and reliable procedure in establishments with a technical platform able to support this management strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05691348. Registered on 20 January 2023.

Effectiveness of different appendiceal stump closure methods in laparoscopic appendectomy a network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Choosing the best stump closure method for laparoscopic appendectomy has been a debated issue, especially for patients with acute appendicitis. The lack of consensus in the literature and the diverse techniques available have prompted the need for a comprehensive evaluation to guide surgeons in selecting the most optimal appendiceal stump closure method. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted on multiple databases from inception until December 2023 to find relevant studies according to eligibility criteria. The primary outcome was the incidence of total complications. RESULTS: 25 studies with a total of 3308 patients were included in this study, overall complications did not reveal a significant advantage for any intervention (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53; 1.01), Superficial and deep infection risks were similar across all methods, Operative time was significantly longer with endoloop and Intracorporeal sutures (MD = 7.07, 95% CI: 3.28; 10.85) (MD = 26.1, 95% CI: 20.9; 31.29). CONCLUSIONS: There are no significant differences in overall complications among closure methods. However, Intracorporeal sutures and endoloop techniques were associated with extended operative durations.

Is appendoscope a new option for the treatment of acute appendicitis?

Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency. It is commonly caused by obstruction of the appendiceal lumen due to fecaliths, tumors, or lymphoid hyperplasia. For over a century, appendectomy has been the primary treatment for acute appendicitis. Abraham Groves performed the first open appendectomy in 1883. In 1983, Kurt Semm completed the first laparoscopic appendectomy, heralding a new era in appendectomy. However, appendectomy is associated with certain complications and a rate of negative appendectomies. Studies have suggested controversy over the impact of appendectomy on the development of inflammatory bowel disease and Parkinson's disease, but an increasing number of studies indicate a possible positive correlation between appendectomy and colorectal cancer, gallstones, and cardiovascular disease. With the recognition that the appendix is not a vestigial organ and the advancement of endoscopic te-chnology, Liu proposed the endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy. It is an effective minimally invasive alternative for treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Our team has developed an appendoscope with a disposable digital imaging system operated through the biopsy channel of a colonoscope and successfully applied it in the treatment of appendicitis. This article provides an overview of the progress in endoscopic treatment for acute appendicitis and offers a new perspective on the future direction of appendiceal disease treatment.

Daytime versus nighttime appendectomy in term of complications and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Appendicitis is one of the most common acute surgical conditions globally. However, the association between nighttime appendectomy and patients' morbidity and mortality is unclear. This study aims to compare outcomes following nighttime versus daytime appendectomy. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to March 26, 2024 (updated on July 1, 2024) were searched. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative complications, reoperation, readmission, conversion to laparotomy, hospital stay and operation time. Mean difference (MD) or odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Fifteen studies totaling 33,596 patients were included. There were no differences between nighttime and daytime appendectomy for rates of overall postoperative complications (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87, 1.00, 14 studies), mortality (OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.37, 7.88, 7 studies), intraoperative complications (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.08, 9.86; 2 studies), reoperation (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.06, 2.55; 3 studies) and readmission (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.65, 1.13; I2 = 0%, 5 studies). However, the conversion to laparotomy risks (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.12, 3.29; 6 studies) among patients who underwent appendectomy during nighttime was significantly elevated compared to daytime. CONCLUSIONS: There was no increased risk or difference in postoperative mortality and complication rates associated with nighttime compared with daytime appendectomy. However, future studies should assess the reasons for higher conversion rates during the night.

Risk factors for developing intra-abdominal abscess following appendicectomy for acute appendicitis: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendicectomy is commonly performed in Australia for treatment of acute appendicitis. Intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) is a potential complication following appendicectomy for acute appendicitis. Risk factors for developing post-operative IAA remain controversial and poorly defined. Laparoscopic washout may be performed for patients who develop complication(s) including IAA. The aim of this study was to define risk factors for both the development of IAA and identify patients who may require laparoscopic washout following appendicectomy. METHODS: Data were obtained from 423 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy over a five-year period (2012-2017). Clinical (fever, haemodynamics, examination findings), biochemical (white cell count, neutrophil count, C-reactive protein, bilirubin, albumin), radiological (CT free fluid), and operative factors (inflammation, suppuration, free-fluid, perforation, histopathology) collected in the pre-, peri-, and post-operative period(s) were analysed. RESULTS: 23 (5.4%) patients developed post-operative IAA. Duration of intravenous antibiotics was significantly longer in patients who developed IAA and in those who required laparoscopic washout (p < 0.0001). C-reactive protein (CRP) on admission (p < 0.05) and appendiceal perforation (p = 0.0005) were significantly higher in patients who either developed IAA or needed laparoscopic washout. No clinical or radiological finding predicted either the development of IAA or need for laparoscopic washout. CONCLUSION: Elevated CRP on admission may predict the development of post-operative IAA formation or the need for laparoscopic washout post-appendicectomy. Prolonged post-operative antibiotic use appears independent of the development of IAA as well as the need for laparoscopic washout. These data highlight the need for clear guidelines on peri-operative antibiotic use following appendicectomy.

Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children and adolescents: what have we learnt in more than 1200 cases?

PURPOSE: TULAA combines the laparoscopic and open technique and is considered to be a safe, fast and cost-effective procedure. On the other hand, preparation is limited due to the single instrument, especially in complicated appendicitis. In this study we analyze the outcome of our TULAA patients, focusing on conversion and complication rates. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including all patients treated with TULAA in our department between 2006 and 2016. We analyzed patient data, operative data, costs, complications, and conversion rate to standard laparoscopic or open appendectomy. RESULTS: 1275 children and adolescents were enrolled. Mean age was 10.2 years. TULAA was completed in 88% of cases. The overall mean operative time was 33 min. The overall complication rate was 5.7%. The most common complications were wound infection (2.7%), seroma (1.7%) and wound abscess (1.4%). Both the conversion rate and the complication rate were significantly higher in complicated appendicitis. Furthermore, the conversion rate is higher in overweight or obese patients. CONCLUSION: TULAA is a safe, quick and cost-effective treatment option for acute appendicitis in children and adolescents. The complication rate and conversion rate are significantly correlated with the degree of appendiceal inflammation and comparable other surgical procedures.

Population-Based Intraoperative Disease Severity Criteria for Pediatric Appendicitis.

Importance: A standardized severity assessment approach is needed in children with appendicitis for postoperative adverse event estimation and severity adjustment for hospital-level comparative performance reporting. Objective: To examine the association between the presence and number of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Pediatric-defined intraoperative criteria for complicated appendicitis and outcomes in a population-based sample of children. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Pediatric Appendectomy Procedure Targeted Participant Use Data File and General Participant Use Data File for children younger than 18 years who underwent appendectomy from January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2022, at 148 hospitals participating in NSQIP Pediatric. Exposure: The presence of NSQIP Pediatric intraoperative criteria for complicated appendicitis (ie, visible perforation, intraperitoneal abscess, extraluminal fecalith, and diffuse fibrinopurulent exudate). Main Outcomes and Measures: Adverse event outcomes included postoperative rates of any surgical site infection (incisional or organ space), percutaneous drainage, sepsis, and reoperation. Resource use outcomes included operative duration and hospital length of stay, and rates of postoperative imaging, parenteral nutrition use, and revisits. Multivariable regression was used to explore the influence of individual and combinations of intraoperative criteria on outcomes after adjusting for patient characteristics. Results: Of 82 950 patients included, 23 221 (27.9%) had at least 1 finding of complicated appendicitis. Compared with cases without any criteria present, the presence of each finding of complicated appendicitis was independently associated with higher rates of any adverse events; adjusted odds ratios (AORs) by finding were 5.57 (95% CI, 5.04-6.15) for visible hole, 4.83 (95% CI, 4.17-5.59) for diffuse fibrinopurulent exudate, 7.06 (95% CI, 5.77-8.63) for abscess, and 6.62 (95% CI, 4.78-9.15) for fecalith. An increasing number of criteria was associated with a stepwise increase in risk of any adverse events; AOR by number of criteria met were 5.55 (95% CI, 5.09-6.05) for 1 criterion, 8.86 (95% CI, 8.16-9.62) for 2 criteria, and 16.65 (95% CI, 15.10-18.35) for ≥3 criteria. Similar patterns in criteria-specific and cumulative implications for outcomes were observed with each individual adverse event and resource use measure. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that postoperative complications and increased resource use are associated with the presence and number of NSQIP Pediatric criteria for complicated appendicitis. These criteria should be considered the gold standard, evidence-based severity assessment framework for estimating risk of adverse events and resource use in children with appendicitis.

[Association between previous appendectomy and cognitive impairment in adults: a case-control study]. / Vliyanie predshestvuyushchei appendektomii na kognitivnye narusheniya u vzroslykh: issledovanie «sluchai-kontrol'¼.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between appendectomy and cognitive impairment in adults aged 50-70 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A case-control study was carried out with 270 patients between May and July 2023. Ninety cases (with cognitive impairment) and 180 controls (without impairment), diagnosed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), were assessed. RESULTS: 31.11% of the total cases with cognitive impairment were submitted to an appendectomy, with an average of 25 years since surgery. Regarding other surgeries: 40% with impairment underwent cholecystectomy and 23.33% reported other operations. The analysis revealed significant differences in age, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes and smoking between the groups. However, there was no significant difference by gender. Logistic regression analysis highlighted that age and past appendectomy were strongly associated with cognitive impairment, with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 1.20 and 12.91, respectively. Associations were also found with cholecystectomy (OR 7.33), other surgeries (OR 13.39) and smoking (OR 6.91). CONCLUSION: Appendectomy might be a significant risk factor for cognitive impairment in adults aged 50-70 years.

Leaking Ectopic Pregnancy Following In vitro Fertilization with Associated Acute Appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy associated with appendicitis is rare, with very few cases reported in the literature. It is unclear if appendicitis is coincidentally associated with ectopic pregnancy or a possible risk factor for the development of ectopic pregnancy. Ruptured ectopic pregnancy has also been postulated as a possible risk factor leading to appendicitis because of the probable inflammatory reaction involving the adjacent appendix. METHODS: We present a 34-year-old female who presented with right lower abdominal pain and bleeding per vaginam, three weeks after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. RESULTS: A diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy was made following a positive ß-HCG and empty uterine cavity on pelvic ultrasound scan. Intraoperatively, the appendix was noted to be inflammed and it was removed and confirmed on histology examination as acute appendicitis. CONCLUSION: Ruptured ectopic pregnancy associated with acute appendicitis is rare, with few cases reported in the literature. We recommend an examination for other possible differentials of ruptured ectopic pregnancy like appendicitis during surgery for ectopic pregnancy on the right side.

CONTEXTE: L'association de la grossesse extra-utérine avec l'appendicite est rare, avec très peu de cas rapportés dans la littérature. Il n'est pas clair si l'appendicite est associée de manière fortuite à la grossesse extra-utérine ou si elle constitue un facteur de risque possible pour le développement de celle-ci. On a également postulé que la grossesse extra-utérine rompue pourrait être un facteur de risque conduisant à l'appendicite en raison de la probable réaction inflammatoire impliquant l'appendice adjacent. MÉTHODES: Nous présentons le cas d'une femme de 34 ans qui s'est présentée avec une douleur abdominale basse à droite et des saignements vaginaux, trois semaines après une fécondation in vitro et un transfert d'embryon. RÉSULTATS: Un diagnostic de grossesse extra-utérine a été posé suite à un test de ß-HCG positif et une cavité utérine vide à l'échographie pelvienne. En peropératoire, l'appendice a été noté comme étant inflammé et a été retiré. L'examen histologique a confirmé une appendicite aiguë. CONCLUSION: La grossesse extra-utérine rompue associée à une appendicite aiguë est rare, avec quelques cas rapportés dans la littérature. Nous recommandons un examen pour d'autres diagnostics différentiels possibles de la grossesse extra-utérine rompue, comme l'appendicite, lors de la chirurgie pour grossesse extra-utérine du côté droit. MOTS CLÉS: Grossesse extra-utérine hémorragique, Appendicite, Fécondation in vitro, Laparotomie.

Appendix removal affects the subsequent cancer risk in Asian adults: A territory-wide population-based cohort study.

Human appendix is critical for the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis. Appendicectomy has been the optimal treatment of acute appendicitis, yet the cancer incidence after appendix removal remains unclear. In this territory-wide retrospective cohort study, adult participants who underwent appendicectomy from 2000 to 2018 were retrieved from a population database (n = 43,983), while matched reference participants were retrieved as controls (n = 85,853). After appendicectomy, the overall cancer risk was significantly increased (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) = 1.124) compared to the non-appendicectomy group. Appendicectomy-treated males had higher cancer risk than males without appendicectomy (SHR = 1.197), while such difference was not observed in female participants. Significant increase in cancer risk was also observed in elder participants (age >60) with appendicectomy (SHR = 1.390). Appendicectomy was positively correlated with the risk of digestive tract and respiratory cancers including colon (SHR = 1.440), pancreas (SHR = 1.930), and trachea, bronchus, and lung (SHR = 1.394). In contrast, the risk of liver cancer was markedly decreased after appendicectomy (SHR = 0.713). In conclusion, we reported the association of appendicectomy with subsequent cancer incidence. These findings highlight the potential complication after appendix removal and the necessity of post-operative management to monitor and prevent long-term adverse events.

Effect of Ondansetron on Postoperative Pain and Vomiting after Acute Appendicitis Surgery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Common postoperative complications following surgery, particularly acute appendicitis surgery, include postoperative pain and vomiting, which can cause discomfort and delay recovery time. Methods: A randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted with 80 cases of acute appendicitis of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II and aged 18-60 y/o scheduled for appendectomy under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups: group A received 4 mg of ondansetron IV (2 ml) and group B received 2 ml of normal slain IV (placebo). Pain according to VAS, nausea and vomiting according to clinical symptoms, shivering and sedation according to the Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale (BSAS), and the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery were evaluated and compared between the groups. Results: There was a significant decline in the severity of pain only at 2 hours after surgery between the ondansetron and control groups (5.3 ± 1.0 vs. 6.0 ± 1.0; p=0.01), not showing a difference between the groups at 6, 12, and 24 hours after appendectomy. Postoperative nausea and vomiting at 2 (5% vs. 25%; p=0.03) and 6 (7.5% vs. 27.5%; p=0.04) hours after appendectomy in the ondansetron group. At different times, the ondansetron and control groups did not differ in terms of pethidine consumption or sedation. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study found that ondansetron was effective in reducing postoperative vomiting after acute appendicitis surgery. However, it did not show a clinically significant effect on postoperative pain. This trial is registered with IRCT20230722058883N1.

Association of High BMI With Morbidity and Mortality in Common Emergency General Surgery Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency general surgery (EGS) patients are at increased risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality. Obesity is a risk factor for poor outcomes in this population. Our study aimed to explore the association of body mass index (BMI) with postoperative outcomes in patients requiring common EGS procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review of the 2018-2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database identified patients undergoing four common EGS procedures: large bowel resection, small bowel resection, cholecystectomy, and appendectomy. Patients were classified by BMI: normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), obesity classes I (30-34.9 kg/m2), II (35-39.9 kg/m2), III (40-49.9 kg/m2), and IV (≥50 kg/m2). Main outcomes of interest were major adverse event (MAE) and mortality. RESULTS: From 2018 to 2020, a total of 82,540 patients underwent one of four common EGS procedures. On unadjusted analysis, obesity class IV had higher mortality rates compared to classes I-III (6.2% vs 3.1%, P < 0.001). Patients in obesity classes I-III had lower odds of MAE and death relative to those of normal weight. Compared to other patients with obesity, those in obesity class IV were at increased risk of MAE (odds ratio 1.27; 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.44) and death (odds ratio 1.69; 95% confidence interval 1.34-2.13). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with varying degrees of obesity have different risk profiles following common EGS procedures. While patients in lower obesity classes had reduced odds of adverse outcomes, those with BMI ≥50 kg/m2 were particularly at greater risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality. This vulnerable population warrants further investigation and increased vigilance to ensure high-quality care.

Placement of a drainage tube in the ileac lumen following laparoscopic appendectomy: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Ileal perforation caused by the insertion of a drainage tube is a rare complication. Hence, the utilization of surgical drains in abdominal surgery remains controversial. At present, there is a trend to reduce the utilization of drains in abdominal surgery, although certain situations may necessitate their application. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 25-year-old Chinese woman presented with a history of right lower abdominal pain persisting for 10 days. Imaging examinations, including abdominal computed tomography and ultrasound, identified low-density lesions measuring 10 × 8 × 8cm3 in the right lower abdomen, which are consistent with perforated appendicitis complicated by a peri-appendiceal abscess. A laparoscopic appendectomy was carried out. On the 5th postoperative day, the drainage fluid changed to a grass-green color (80mL). Imaging with retrograde contrast through the drainage tube revealed that the 26 Fr silicon rubber drainage tube tip was positioned 50cm away from the ileocecal junction within the ileum. Both the ileal and ileocecal regions appeared well-developed. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOMES: Oral intake was suspended, and the patient received antacids, somatostatin, antibiotics, and total parenteral nutrition. On the 19th postoperative day, a follow-up imaging procedure using retrograde contrast through the drainage tube indicated that the tube tip was sealed. The treatment concluded on day 33 postoperatively, and the patient was discharged. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Ileal perforation due to an abdominal drainage tube following laparoscopic appendectomy constitutes a rare but serious complication. However, due to the adhesion and inflammatory changes around the abscess, laparoscopic dissection becomes a challenging and risky process, and the surgical skills and experiences are particularly important. Removing the abdominal drainage tube promptly based on the characteristics of the drainage fluid is recommended. The findings provide valuable insights for surgeons navigating similar challenges.

Antibiotic treatment after appendectomy for acute complicated appendicitis to prevent intrabdominal abscess and wound infections.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the most appropriate duration of postoperative antibiotic treatment to minimize the incidence of intraabdominal abscesses and wound infections in patients with complicated appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, which included 396 adult patients who underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between January 2010 and December 2020 at the University Hospital Erlangen, patients were classified into two groups based on the duration of their postoperative antibiotic intake: ≤ 3 postoperative days (group 1) vs. ≥ 4 postoperative days (group 2). The incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses and wound infections were compared between the groups. Additionally, multivariate risk factor analysis for the occurrence of intraabdominal abscesses and wound infections was performed. RESULTS: The two groups contained 226 and 170 patients, respectively. The incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses (2% vs. 3%, p = 0.507) and wound infections (3% vs. 6%, p = 0.080) did not differ significantly between the groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that an additional cecum resection (OR 5.5 (95% CI 1.4-21.5), p = 0.014) was an independent risk factor for intraabdominal abscesses. A higher BMI (OR 5.9 (95% CI 1.2-29.2), p = 0.030) and conversion to an open procedure (OR 5.2 (95% CI 1.4-20.0), p = 0.016) were identified as independent risk factors for wound infections. CONCLUSION: The duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy does not appear to influence the incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses and wound infections. Therefore, short-term postoperative antibiotic treatment should be preferred.

Low Pressure versus Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The creation of pneumoperitoneum using higher pressure is believed to be associated with increased postoperative abdominal pain. AIM: This study aimed to compare postoperative abdominal pain following low pressure laparoscopic appendectomy and standard pressure laparoscopic appendectomy. METHODS: This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of 54 patients aged between 18 and 56 years with clinical and/or radiologic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: low pressure laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 26) and standard pressure laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 28). The intra-abdominal pressure was kept in either low pressure (9 mm Hg) or standard pressure (13 mm Hg). Abdominal and shoulder pain scores were assessed using the visual analog scale at 6 hours and 3 days post procedure. Postoperative analgesia requirement, duration of surgery, complications, and hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS: Both groups match for the demographic parameters. Three patients required conversion from low to standard pressure. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of abdominal pain (P = 0.86) and shoulder pain (P = 0.33), duration of surgery (P = 0.51), complications (P = 0.17), and length of hospital stay (P = 0.83). CONCLUSION: The use of low pressure pneumoperitoneum did not reduce the incidence of abdominal pain in patients who had laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients with acute appendicitis can be treated with either low or normal pressure pneumoperitoneum depending on the experience of the surgeon.

Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess.

BACKGROUND: This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2017. Acute appendicitis (inflammation of the appendix) can be simple or complicated. Appendiceal phlegmon and appendiceal abscess are examples of complicated appendicitis. Appendiceal phlegmon is a diffuse inflammation in the bottom right of the appendix, while appendiceal abscess is a discrete inflamed mass in the abdomen that contains pus. Appendiceal phlegmon and abscess account for 2% to 10% of acute appendicitis. People with appendiceal phlegmon or abscess usually need an appendicectomy to relieve their symptoms (e.g. abdominal pain, loss of appetite, nausea, and vomiting) and avoid complications (e.g. peritonitis (infection of abdominal lining)). Surgery for people with appendiceal phlegmon or abscess may be early (immediately after hospital admission or within a few days of admission), or delayed (several weeks later in a subsequent hospital admission). The optimal timing of appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess is debated. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of early appendicectomy compared to delayed appendicectomy on overall morbidity and mortality in people with appendiceal phlegmon or abscess. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and five trials registers on 11 June 2023, together with reference checking to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all individual and cluster-randomised controlled trials (RCTs), irrespective of language, publication status, or age of participants, comparing early versus delayed appendicectomy in people with appendiceal phlegmon or abscess. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight RCTs that randomised 828 participants to early or delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon (7 trials) or appendiceal abscess (1 trial). The studies were conducted in the USA, India, Nepal, and Pakistan. All RCTs were at high risk of bias because of lack of blinding and lack of published protocols. They were also unclear about methods of randomisation and length of follow-up. 1. Early versus delayed open or laparoscopic appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon We included seven trials involving 788 paediatric and adult participants with appendiceal phlegmon: 394 of the participants were randomised to the early appendicectomy group (open or laparoscopic appendicectomy as soon as the appendiceal mass resolved within the same admission), and 394 were randomised to the delayed appendicectomy group (initial conservative treatment followed by delayed open or laparoscopic appendicectomy several weeks later). There was no mortality in either group. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of early appendicectomy on overall morbidity (risk ratio (RR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 2.86; 3 trials, 146 participants; very low-certainty evidence), the proportion of participants who developed wound infections (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.02; 7 trials, 788 participants), and the proportion of participants who developed faecal fistulas (RR 1.75, 95% CI 0.36 to 8.49; 5 trials, 388 participants). Early appendicectomy may reduce the abdominal abscess rate (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.80; 4 trials, 626 participants; very low-certainty evidence), reduce the total length of hospital stay by about two days (mean difference (MD) -2.02 days, 95% CI -3.13 to -0.91; 5 trials, 680 participants), and increase the time away from normal activities by about five days (MD 5.00 days; 95% CI 1.52 to 8.48; 1 trial, 40 participants), but the evidence is very uncertain. 2. Early versus delayed laparoscopic appendicectomy for appendiceal abscess We included one trial involving 40 paediatric participants with appendiceal abscess: 20 were randomised to the early appendicectomy group (emergent laparoscopic appendicectomy), and 20 were randomised to the delayed appendicectomy group (initial conservative treatment followed by delayed laparoscopic appendicectomy 10 weeks later). There was no mortality in either group. The trial did not report on overall morbidity, various complications, or time away from normal activities. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of early appendicectomy on the total length of hospital stay (MD -0.20 days, 95% CI -3.54 to 3.14; very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For the comparison of early versus delayed open or laparoscopic appendicectomy for paediatric and adult participants with appendiceal phlegmon, very low-certainty evidence suggests that early appendicectomy may reduce the abdominal abscess rate. The evidence is very uncertain whether early appendicectomy prevents overall morbidity or other complications. Early appendicectomy may reduce the total length of hospital stay and increase the time away from normal activities, but the evidence is very uncertain. For the comparison of early versus delayed laparoscopic appendicectomy for paediatric participants with appendiceal abscess, data are sparse, and we cannot rule out significant benefits or harms of early versus delayed appendicectomy. Further trials on this topic are urgently needed and should specify a set of criteria for use of antibiotics, percutaneous drainage of the appendiceal abscess prior to surgery, and resolution of the appendiceal phlegmon or abscess. Future trials should include outcomes such as time away from normal activities and length of hospital stay.

Appendectomy and the Risk of Parkinson's Disease: A Korean Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND: The vermiform appendix is considered a potential reservoir for the abnormal α-synuclein aggregate in Parkinson's disease (PD). Previous epidemiologic evidence on the association between appendectomy and PD risk remains inconclusive, especially outside the Western world. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between appendectomy and PD risk in Korea. METHODS: Among 703,831 eligible adult subjects in the National Health Insurance Service sample cohort, we identified 16,122 patients who underwent appendectomy. The rest formed the control group. PD risk was assessed using time-dependent Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The appendectomy group did not have altered risk of PD compared with the control group in either unadjusted [hazard ratio (HR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.80, P = 0.08] or adjusted model (HR 1.42, CI 0.88-2.30, P = 0.15). No further statistical difference appeared when stratified by sex. CONCLUSIONS: Appendectomy is not associated with altered risk of PD in the Korean population.

The impact of surgical timing on outcome in acute appendicitis in adults: a retrospective observational population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is a global disease with high incidence. The main objective was to assess the association between time from admission to surgery (TAS) and surgery during emergency hours with operative outcome in light of conflicting evidence. METHODS: This is a retrospective population-wide analysis of hospital billing data (2010-2021) of all adult patient records of surgically treated cases of acute appendicitis in Germany by TAS. The primary outcome was a composite clinical endpoint (CCE; prolonged length of stay, surgical site infection, interventional draining after surgery, revision surgery, ICU admission and/or in-hospital mortality). Cases of complicated appendicitis were identified using diagnosis (ICD-10) and procedural codes (resection beyond appendectomy). RESULTS: 855 694 patient records were included, of which 27·6% (236,481) were complicated cases of acute appendicitis. 49·0% (418,821) were females and median age was 37 (interquartile range 22·5-51·5). Age, male sex, and comorbidity were associated with an increased proportion of CCE and in-hospital mortality. TAS was associated with a clinically relevant increase of CCE after 12 h in complicated appendicitis [Odd's ratio (OR), 1·19, 95% CI: 1·14-1·21] and after 24 h in uncomplicated appendicitis (OR 1·10, 95% CI: 1·02-1·19). Beyond the primary endpoint, the proportion of complicated appendicitis increased after TAS of 72 h. Surgery during emergency hours (6 pm-6.59 am) was associated with an increase of CCE and mortality (OR between 1·14 and 1·49). Age, female sex, night-time admission, weekend admission, a known previous surgery, obesity, and therapeutic anticoagulation were associated with delayed performance of surgery. CONCLUSION: This work found an increase of a CCE after TAS of 12 h for complicated appendicitis and an increase of the CCE after TAS of 24 h for uncomplicated appendicitis with a stable proportion of complicated appendicitis in these time windows. Both CCE and mortality were increased if appendectomy was performed during emergency hours.