Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 13(7): e0200384, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29995963

ABSTRACT

Dogs are highly susceptible to the leptospiral infection, notably stray and sheltered dogs. Unsanitary conditions often observed in dog shelters may predispose the introduction and spread of leptospires among sheltered populations, potentially increasing the chances for the inadvertent adoption of asymptomatically infected animals. The present work describes a longitudinal study using a multidisciplinary approach for the identification of chronically infected dogs and the characterization of potentially pathogenic strains circulating among stray and sheltered dog populations in São Paulo, Brazil. A total of 123 dogs from three populations were included. The initial evaluation consisted of blood and urine quantitative PCR testing (qPCR), the detection of specific antibodies by microscopic agglutination test (MAT), physical examination and hematological and serum biochemistry analyses. The qPCR-positive dogs were prospectively examined, and reevaluations also included culture from urine samples. Positive qPCR samples were subjected to 16S rRNA and secY gene phylogenetic analysis. The recovered strains were characterized by Multilocus Sequence Typing, polyclonal serogroup identification and virulence determination. Leptospiruria was detected in all populations studied (13/123), and phylogenetic analysis revealed that 10 dogs had L. interrogans infection. Three dogs (3/13) had L. santarosai infection. The secY phylogenetic analysis revealed that the L. santarosai sequences clustered separately from those obtained from other hosts. Ten leptospiruric dogs were reevaluated, and three dogs presented persistent leptospiruria, allowing culturing from two dogs. The strains were characterized as L. interrogans serogroup Canicola (virulent) and L. santarosai serogroup Sejroe (not virulent). Serum samples were retested by MAT using the DU92 and DU114 strains as antigens, and no increased seroreactivity was detected. Asymptomatic L. santarosai infection was observed in all populations studied, suggesting a possible role of dogs in the chain of transmission of this leptospiral species. The results suggest a genetic distinction between lineages of Brazilian L. santarosai maintained by dogs and other animal hosts. Our findings revealed that dogs could act as maintenance hosts for distinct pathogenic Leptospira, highlighting also that asymptomatically infected dogs can be inadvertently admitted and adopted in dog shelters, potentially increasing the risks of zoonotic transmission.


Subject(s)
Dog Diseases/epidemiology , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Leptospirosis/veterinary , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Bacterial Proteins/blood , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/urine , Brazil , Chronic Disease , Cities , Dogs , Female , Leptospira/genetics , Leptospira/isolation & purification , Leptospirosis/epidemiology , Leptospirosis/microbiology , Male , Phylogeny , Prospective Studies , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/blood , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/urine
2.
Rev Chilena Infectol ; 29(3): 263-72, 2012 Jun.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23096465

ABSTRACT

Bacterial identification is important for the proper treatment of infected patients hospitalized with serious infections especially in critical care units. Identification by conventional methods used in microbiology laboratories takes at least 16 hours since a culture is positive. The introduction of mass spectrometry, specifically MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer) in the microbiology laboratory could mean a radical change in the identification accuracy, turn around time (6 minutes per bacteria) and cost (about 5 times cheaper than conventional identification). Since its introduction in clinical microbiology laboratories in 2008, many reports about its usefulness in identifying microorganisms from colonies, as well as directly from positive blood cultures and urine samples have been published. This review describes MALDI-TOF MS methodology, its identification performance for bacteria (aerobic and anaerobic), mycobacterium and yeasts, its future applications in microbiology and its main disadvantages.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , Bacterial Proteins/isolation & purification , Phylogeny , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/trends , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Proteins/blood , Bacterial Proteins/urine , Databases, Protein , Mass Spectrometry/trends , Mycobacterium/classification , Ribosomal Proteins/isolation & purification , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/economics , Yeasts/classification
3.
Rev. chil. infectol ; Rev. chil. infectol;29(3): 263-272, jun. 2012. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-645593

ABSTRACT

Bacterial identification is important for the proper treatment of infected patients hospitalized with serious infections especially in critical care units. Identification by conventional methods used in microbiology laboratories takes at least 16 hours since a culture is positive. The introduction of mass spectrometry, specifically MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer) in the microbiology laboratory could mean a radical change in the identification accuracy, turn around time (6 minutes per bacteria) and cost (about 5 times cheaper than conventional identification). Since its introduction in clinical microbiology laboratories in 2008, many reports about its usefulness in identifying microorganisms from colonies, as well as directly from positive blood cultures and urine samples have been published. This review describes MALDI-TOF MS methodology, its identification performance for bacteria (aerobic and anaerobic), mycobacterium and yeasts, its future applications in microbiology and its main disadvantages.


La identificación bacteriana es muy importante en el manejo adecuado de los pacientes infectados, especialmente aquellos con infecciones graves hospitalizados en unidades de pacientes críticos. La identificación por los métodos convencionales utilizados en los laboratorios de microbiología clínica demora al menos 16 horas desde que un cultivo es positivo. La introducción de la espectrometría de masas, específicamente del espectrómetro de masas por tiempo de migración (tiempo de vuelo) con desorción/ionización laser asistida por una matriz (MALDI-TOF MS, por su sigla en inglés matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer), en el laboratorio de microbiología podría significar un cambio radical en la precisión de la identificación, el tiempo de detección (6 minutos por bacterias) y el costo (aproximadamente 5 veces más económico que la identificación convencional). Desde su introducción en los laboratorios de microbiología clínica en el año 2008, se han escrito numerosas publicaciones sobre su utilidad en la identificación de microorganismos desde colonias, así como directamente desde hemocultivos positivos y de muestras de orina. Esta revisión describe la metodología de MALDI-TOF MS, su rendimiento en la identificación de bacterias aerobias, anaerobias, micobacterias y levaduras, sus futuras aplicaciones en microbiología y sus principales desventajas.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , Bacterial Proteins/isolation & purification , Phylogeny , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Proteins/blood , Bacterial Proteins/urine , Databases, Protein , Mass Spectrometry/trends , Mycobacterium/classification , Ribosomal Proteins/isolation & purification , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization , Yeasts/classification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL