Long-Term Impact of Diabetic Retinopathy on Response to Anti-VEGF Treatment in Neovascular AMD.

Purpose: To explore the long-term effect of diabetic retinopathy on response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in age-related macular degeneration-associated type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Methods: A total of 45 eyes with exudative neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with type 1 MNV were included in the analysis. Among them, 24 eyes of 24 patients had no history of diabetes mellitus (DM) in their anamnesis and were assigned to the Not Diabetic group; 21 eyes of 21 patients had mild diabetic retinopathy and were included in the Diabetic group. We considered the following outcome measures: (1) best-corrected visual acuity changes; (2) central macular thickness; (3) MNV lesion area; and (4) MNV flow area. The OCTA acquisitions were performed at the following time points: (1) baseline visit, which corresponded to the day before the first injection; (2) post-loading phase (LP), which was scheduled at 1 month after the last LP injection; and (3) 12-month follow-up visit. Results: All morphofunctional parameters showed a significant improvement after the LP and at the 12-month follow-up visit. Specifically, both the Diabetic group and the Not Diabetic group displayed a significant reduction of MNV lesion areas at both the post-LP assessment (P = 0.026 and P = 0.016, respectively) and the 12-month follow-up (P = 0.039 and P = 0.025, respectively). Similarly, the MNV flow area was significantly decreased in both the Diabetic group and the Not Diabetic group at the post-LP assessment (P < 0.001 and P = 0.012, respectively) and at the 12-month follow-up (P = 0.01 and P = 0.035, respectively) compared to baseline. A smaller reduction in the MNV lesion area was observed in the Diabetic group at both the post-LP evaluation (P = 0.015) and the 12-month follow-up (P = 0.032). No other significant differences were found between the groups for the other parameters (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Our results indicated that the Diabetic group exhibited a smaller reduction in MNV lesion area after 12 months of anti-VEGF treatment. This highlights the importance of considering diabetic retinopathy as a potential modifier of treatment outcomes in nAMD management, with DM serving as a crucial risk factor during anti-angiogenic treatment.

Classification and Regression Trees to Predict for Survival for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab.

PURPOSE: Systemic therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab can extend life for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is substantial variability in response to therapy and overall survival. Although current prognostic models have been validated in HCC, they primarily consider covariates that may be reflective of the severity of the underlying liver disease of patients with HCC. We developed and internally validated a classification and regression tree (CART) to identify patient characteristics associated with risks of early mortality, at or before 6 months from treatment initiation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived deidentified database and included patients with a diagnosis of HCC after January 1, 2020, who received initial systemic therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. CART was developed from available baseline clinical and demographic information to predict mortality within 6 months from treatment initiation. Model characteristics were compared to the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) model and was further validated against a contemporary validation cohort of patients after a data update. RESULTS: A total of 293 patients were analyzed. The CART identified seven cohorts of patients from baseline demographic and laboratory characteristics. The model had an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.739 (95% CI, 0.683 to 0.794) for predicting 6-month mortality. This model was internally valid and performed more favorably than the ALBI model, which had an AUROC of 0.608 (95% CI, 0.557 to 0.660). The model applied to the contemporary validation cohort (n = 111) had an AUROC of 0.666 (95% CI, 0.506 to 0.826). CONCLUSION: Using CART, we identified unique cohorts of patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab with distinct risks of early mortality. This approach outperformed the ALBI model and used clinical and laboratory characteristics that are readily available to oncologists caring for these patients.

Combination of pemetrexed with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis study.

BACKGROUND: Combining pemetrexed with bevacizumab may have some potential in improving the efficacy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and this meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of pemetrexed addition to bevacizumab on treatment efficacy for NSCLC. METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of pemetrexed addition to bevacizumab on treatment efficacy in patients with NSCLC. Overall survival and progression-free survival were included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: Four RCTs were finally included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with bevacizumab for NSCLC, pemetrexed addition showed significantly improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76 to 0.99; P = 0.03), survival rate (odd ratio [OR] = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.86; P = 0.02), progression-free survival (HR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.72; P < 0.00001) and progression-free survival rate (OR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.38 to 2.67; P < 0.00001), but led to the increase in grade ≥ 3 adverse events (OR = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.62 to 2.84; P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed addition may be effective to improve treatment efficacy for NSCLC compared to bevacizumab treatment.

Celiac trunk aortic dissection induced by bevacizumab therapy for rectal cancer: A case report.

RATIONALE: Bevacizumab (Bev) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor A and is primarily used for the treatment of various solid tumors. Aortic dissection (AD) is a severe vascular disease caused by the tearing of the intimal layer of the aorta or bleeding within the aortic wall, resulting in the separation of different layers of the aortic wall. However, the pathogenesis is not fully understood. Some studies have suggested that Bev treatment is associated with the occurrence of AD. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 67-year-old Chinese male was diagnosed with rectal cancer accompanied by liver and lung metastasis. Three days after starting combined chemotherapy with Bev, the patient developed persistent abdominal pain. Abdominal CT scan revealed celiac trunk AD in the abdominal aorta. DIAGNOSES: The patient was diagnosed with rectal cancer accompanied by liver and lung metastases. Abdominal CT tomography revealed a celiac trunk AD. INTERVENTIONS: Somatostatin combined with valsartan was used to control blood pressure. The patient was subsequently referred for vascular surgery and underwent an abdominal aortic angiography. Conservative treatment was continued. OUTCOMES: Three months after the initiation of treatment, follow-up abdominal CT scans showed stability in the condition of celiac trunk AD, with no abdominal pain or hypertension. There were no signs of worsening dissection, aneurysm formation, or inadequate perfusion of end organs. LESSONS: There may be a connection between Bev and elevated blood pressure as well as celiac trunk AD.

Real-World Use of Off-Label MVASI in the Treatment of Patients With Neovascular AMD and DME.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-awwb in the off-label treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: All patients with n-AMD and DME treated in the maintenance phase according to the "treat and extend" strategy, who underwent forced drug substitution from bevacizumab to bevacizumab-awwb from October 2022 to April 2023 at the Tor Vergata Polyclinic in Rome, were evaluated in a retrospective study. The primary outcome was changes in central retinal thickness (CRT) over time following drug substitution. The secondary outcomes were variations in drug durability, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal fluid, and the incidence of drug-related local and systemic serious adverse events. Results: Of 80 eyes of 76 patients with n-AMD and 55 eyes of 44 patients with DME included, before and after drug substitution, the average CRT did not statistically differ; the proportion of patients within time intervals of q8, q12, and q16 was not different; and the mean BCVA remained constant. Of a cumulative 3496 bevacizumab-awwb treatments (2154 for patients with n-AMD and 1342 for patients with DME), no local severe complications were detected. Out of a total of 544 patients (342 affected by n-AMD and 202 affected by DME), no serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: In our cohort of patients with n-AMD and DME in the maintenance phase, bevacizumab-awwb seems to represent a viable and cost-effective intravitreal therapy with comparable efficacy and safety to the originator. Translational Relevance: This study provides a preliminary assessment of the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab-awwb, which is widely used off-label in retinal vascular diseases.

Safety of first-line systemic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of first-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer through network meta-analysis. METHODS: The literature from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was searched from the inception of the databases to August 15, 2023, and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to screen studies. The Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool (RoB 2.0) was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 15.0 and R4.3.1 software to compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) among different treatment regimens. RESULTS: A total of 53 randomized controlled trials, involving 17,351 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), were ultimately included, encompassing 29 different therapeutic approaches. According to SUCRA rankings, the CAPOX regimen is most likely to rank first in terms of safety, while the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab regimen is most likely to rank last. In terms of specific AEs, the CAPOX regimen, whether used alone or in combination with targeted drugs (bevacizumab and cetuximab), is associated with a reduced risk of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, as well as an increased risk of thrombocytopenia and diarrhea. The FOLFOX regimen, with or without bevacizumab, is linked to an increased risk of neutropenia and peripheral sensory neuropathy. The FOLFIRI/CAPIRI + bevacizumab regimen is associated with a reduced risk of peripheral sensory neuropathy. S-1 and S-1 + oxaliplatin are well-tolerated in terms of gastrointestinal reactions. The FOLFOXIRI regimen, whether used alone or in combination with targeted drugs, is associated with various AEs. CONCLUSION: In summary, the CAPOX regimen may be the safest option among the first-line systemic treatment regimens for mCRC patients, while the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab regimen may be associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs.

A case series of osseous metastases in patients with glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Extracranial metastases occur in <2% of cases of glioblastoma (GBM). When metastases do occur, bone is the most common destination. Herein, we review clinical characteristics of GBM patients with osseous metastases and evaluate both potential risk factors and prognostic significance. METHODS: Using an institutional database, we identified and retrospectively analyzed 6 patients with both GBM and osseous metastases. We collected data on patient demographics, tumor genetics, clinical courses, and outcomes. Given the rarity of metastatic GBM, we conducted historical comparisons using previously published literature. RESULTS: Five patients with osseous metastases (83%) were male, with a median age of 46 years at GBM diagnosis (range: 20-84). All patients had IDH-wildtype, MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM and 5 (83%) had alterations in TP53. All patients underwent surgical resection for GBM followed by radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Four patients (67%) received bevacizumab prior to bone metastasis diagnosis. Bone metastases were discovered at a median of 12.2 months (range: 5.3-35.2) after GBM diagnosis and 4.8 months after starting bevacizumab (range: 3.5-13.2). Three patients (50%) received immunotherapy. After osseous metastasis diagnosis, the median survival was 25 days (range: 13-225). CONCLUSION: In our cohort, most patients were male and young at the time of GBM diagnosis. All patients had IDH-wildtype, MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM, and most had alterations in TP53, which may be important for osseous metastasis. Most patients received bevacizumab, which has been associated with earlier metastasis. Osseous metastases of GBM occur and portend a dismal prognosis in an already aggressive malignancy.

Diffusion weighted MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient as a prognostic biomarker in evaluating chemotherapy-antiangiogenic treated stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective, single-arm, open-label, clinical trial (BevMar).

PURPOSE: When treating Lung Cancer, it is necessary to identify early treatment failure to enable timely therapeutic adjustments. The Aim of this study was to investigate whether changes in tumor diffusion during treatment with chemotherapy and bevacizumab could serve as a predictor of treatment failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective single-arm, open-label, clinical trial was conducted between September 2014 and December 2020, enrolling patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The patients were treated with chemotherapy-antiangiogenic combination. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was performed at baseline, two, four, and sixteen weeks after initiating treatment. The differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between pre- and post-treatment MRIs were recorded as Delta values (ΔADC). We assessed whether ΔADC could serve as a prognostic biomarker for overall survival (OS), with a five year follow up. RESULTS: 18 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients with a ΔADC value ≥ -3 demonstrated a significantly longer OS with an HR of 0.12 (95 % CI; 0.03- 0.61; p = 0.003) The median OS in patients with a ΔADC value ≥ -3 was 18 months, (95 % C.I; 7-46) compared to 7 months (95 % C.I; 5-9) in those with a ΔADC value < -3. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that early changes in tumor ADC values, may be indicative of a longer OS. Therefore, DW-MRI could serve as an early biomarker for assessing treatment response in patients receiving chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy.

Contribution of plasma levels of VEGF-A and angiopoietin-2 in addition to a genetic variant in KCNAB1 to predict the risk of bevacizumab-induced hypertension.

Bevacizumab-induced hypertension poses a therapeutic challenge and identifying biomarkers for hypertension can enhance therapy safety. Lower plasma levels of VEGF-A, angiopoietin-2, and rs6770663 in KCNAB1 were previously associated with increased risk of bevacizumab-induced hypertension. This study investigated whether these factors independently contribute to grade 2-3 bevacizumab-induced hypertension risk in 277 cancer patients (CALGB/Alliance 90401). Multivariable analyses assessed the independent association of each factor and hypertension. Likelihood ratio test (LRT) evaluated the explanatory significance of combining protein levels and rs6770663 in predicting hypertension. Boostrap was employed to assess the mediation effect of protein levels on the rs6770663 association with hypertension. Lower protein levels and rs6770663 were independently associated with increased hypertension risk. Adding rs6770663 to protein levels improved the prediction of hypertension (LRT p = 0.0002), with no mediation effect observed. Protein levels of VEGF-A, angiopoietin-2 and rs6770663 in KCNAB1 are independent risk factors and, when combined, may improve prediction of bevacizumab-induced hypertension. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00110214.

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus combined stereotactic radiosurgery and bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma; a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival.

Recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) is a brain tumor that is resistant to standard treatments. Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a non-invasive radiation technique, it cannot fully prevent tumor recurrence and progression. Bevacizumab blocks tumor blood supply and has been approved for rGBM. However, the best way to combine SRS and bevacizumab is still unclear. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing SRS alone and SRS plus bevacizumab for rGBM. We searched three databases for articles published until June 2023. All statistical analysis was performed by STATA v.17. Our meta-analysis included 20 studies with 926 patients. We found that the combination therapy had a significantly lower rate of overall survival (OS) than SRS alone at 6-month 0.77[95%CI:0.74-0.85] for SRS alone and (100%) for SRS plus bevacizumab. At 1-year OS, 0.39 [95%CI: 0.32-0.47] for SRS alone and 0.61 [95%CI:0.44-0.77] for SRS plus bevacizumab (P-value:0.02). However, this advantage was not seen in the long term (18 months and two years). Additionally, the combination therapy had lower chances of progression-free survival (PFS) than SRS alone at the 6-month and 1-year time points, but the differences were insignificant. Our study indicates that incorporating bevacizumab with SRS may lead to a short-term increase in OS for rGBM patients but not long-term. Additionally, the PFS rate did not show significant improvement in the group receiving combination therapy. Further clinical trials are necessary to validate the enhanced overall survival with combination therapy for rGBM.

Outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated in the lenvatinib and immunotherapy era (2018-2021) compared to the sorafenib era (2008-2018).

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib (LEN) and atezolizumab + bevacizumab (A + B) have drastically changed the treatment paradigm for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Before these landmark trials, sorafenib (SOR) served as the standard first-line treatment for a decade. Our study aimed to assess the outcomes of HCC patients treated during the SOR era (2008-2018) in contrast to those in the post-SOR era (2018-2021), of which the predominant first-line treatments were LEN or A + B. METHODS: Inclusion criteria of the study were all HCC patients in the Canadian province of Alberta who started first-line systemic therapy at cancer centers between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2021. Survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), along with clinician-assessed response rate (RR), were subject to retrospective analysis. RESULTS: Of 372 total patients, 230 received treatment in the SOR era and 142 in the post-SOR era. The demographic and clinical characteristics for the SOR era and post-SOR era groups are as follows, respectively: the median age was 63 and 64 years, 80% and 81% were male, and 24% and 11% were of East Asian ethnicity. Before receiving systemic treatment, 40% and 33% received TACE, 7% and 9% received TARE, and 3% and 14% received SBRT in the two eras, respectively. In the post-SOR era, patients received A + B (23%), LEN (51%), and SOR (23%) as first-line treatment. There was a statistically significant improvement in RR (15% vs. 26%; p = 0.02), median PFS (3.8 months vs. 7.9 months; p < 0.0001), and median OS (9.8 months vs. 17.0 months; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective multicenter real-world study, HCC patients treated in the post-SOR era, where LEN and A + B were commonly used first-line treatments, exhibited superior OS, PFS, and RR compared to patients treated in the SOR era. The findings of this study affirm the tangible progress achieved in the real world in enhancing outcomes for HCC patients through advancements in treatments over the past 15 years.

Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy and combined laser photocoagulation and intravitreal bevacizumab therapy in the same session in the treatment of aggressive retinopathy of prematurity.

PURPOSE: To compare the results of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) monotherapy and combined intravitreal bevacizumab and laser photocoagulation (LPC) therapies applied in the same session to patients with aggressive retinopathy of prematurity (A-ROP) in our clinic. METHODS: The study included 67 eyes of 37 patients diagnosed with A-ROP and treated. Forty-nine eyes treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent injection monotherapy for A-ROP treatment were included in the first group. The second group consisted of 18 eyes that received injection therapy and LPC treatment. The clinical findings of the two groups were investigated, and their treatment results were compared. RESULTS: Recurrence was observed in 19 of the 49 (38%) eyes in the first group, but there was no recurrence in any of the cases in the second group. While only IVB was applied to eight cases with recurrence, the combination of LPC and IVB treatment was applied to 11 cases. A second recurrence was detected in two of the eight cases that had received IVB monotherapy as a treatment for recurrence and in three of the 11 cases that had received LPC and IVB. The treatment outcomes of the two groups did not statistically significantly differ (P = 0.181). CONCLUSION: We consider that the combined simultaneous LPC and IVB treatment we applied in A-ROP cases is an effective approach, particularly for cases where there are concerns about the patient's ability to attend follow-up appointments.

[Advances in the use of bevacizumab for the treatment of respiratory papilloma].

Respiratory papilloma is a relatively common benign tumor of the respiratory tract, and a few patients may develop malignant changes. The disease has an insidious onset and lacks specific clinical manifestations, and its manifestations are closely related to the growth mode, location and size of the tumor. It can involve multiple parts, such as the larynx, trachea, bronchus, and lung parenchyma, which cause coughing, hoarseness, dysphonia, and, in severe cases, may lead to obstruction of the respiratory tract. At present, the treatment of respiratory papilloma lacks standardization, and there is no effective method to cure the disease. Surgery remains the main treatment for alleviating patients' symptoms and preventing airway obstruction. However, due to the high recurrence rate of respiratory papilloma, multiple surgeries are often needed, which reduces the quality of life of patients and increases their disease burden and economic burden. Bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor-binding antibody inhibitor, is a promising adjuvant treatment modality that shows good potential for reducing symptoms and the frequency of surgery. This article aimed to review the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for the treatment of respiratory papilloma and discuss the differences and efficacy of the systemic application and intralesional injection of bevacizumab for the treatment of respiratory papilloma.

Clinical and radiological effects of Bevacizumab for the treatment of radionecrosis after stereotactic brain radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to analyze the clinical and radiological effects of bevacizumab (BV) on radionecrosis (RN) that developed after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastasis. METHODS: Forty patients with SRT related symptomatic brain RN treated in 10 radiation oncology centers were analyzed. The clinical response to BV treatment was categorized as follows: complete (no additional treatment required), partial (requiring either steroids or repeat BV), and unresponsive (requiring surgery). The radiological features of brain RN were analyzed in 10 patients whose serial MRI scans were available after corticosteroid and BV treatments. RESULTS: BV was used as a first line treatment in 11 (27.5%) and as a second line treatment in 29 (72.5%) of patients. The neurological symptoms regressed in 77.5% of patients after treatment with BV (45% complete response, 32.5% partial response). The median edema volume increased from 75.9 cc (range: 5.9-125.8 cc) at RN to 113.65 cc (range: 1.5-382.1 cc) after use of corticosteroids, representing a rate of 39.8% increase (p = 0.074). However, after BV treatment the median volume of edema decreased to 19.5 cc (range: 0-163.3 cc) which represents a difference of 62.2% (p = 0.041) from RN. CONCLUSION: The use of BV caused clinical response rate of 77.5% and a good radiological response in corticosteroid unresponsive patients. The role of BV should be further investigated in prospective studies.

Adverse event costs of systemic therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy and biologics in the US.

Aim: The objective of this study was to compare adverse event (AE) management costs for fruquintinib, regorafenib, trifluridine/tipiracil (T/T) and trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (T/T+bev) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with at least two prior lines of therapy from the US commercial and Medicare payer perspectives. Materials & methods: A cost-consequence model was developed to calculate the per-patient and per-patient-per-month (PPPM) AE costs using rates of grade 3/4 AEs with incidence ≥5% in clinical trials, event-specific management costs and duration treatment. Anchored comparisons of AE costs were calculated using a difference-in-differences approach with best supportive care (BSC) as a common reference. AE rates and treatment duration were obtained from clinical trials: FRESCO and FRESCO-2 (fruquintinib), RECOURSE (T/T), CORRECT (regorafenib) and SUNLIGHT (T/T, T/T+bev). AE management costs for the commercial and Medicare perspectives were obtained from publicly available sources. Results: From the commercial perspective, the AE costs (presented as per-patient, PPPM) were: $4015, $1091 for fruquintinib (FRESCO); $4253, $1390 for fruquintinib (FRESCO-2); $17,110, $11,104 for T/T (RECOURSE); $9851, $4691 for T/T (SUNLIGHT); $8199, $4823 for regorafenib; and $11,620, $2324 for T/T+bev. These results were consistent in anchored comparisons: the difference-in-difference for fruquintinib based on FRESCO was -$1929 versus regorafenib and -$11,427 versus T/T; for fruquintinib based on FRESCO-2 was -$2257 versus regorafenib and -$11,756 versus T/T. Across all analyses, results were consistent from the Medicare perspective. Conclusion: Fruquintinib was associated with lower AE management costs compared with regorafenib, T/T and T/T+bev for patients with previously treated mCRC. This evidence has direct implications for treatment, formulary and pathways decision-making in this patient population.

Lumbrokinase Extracted from Earthworms Synergizes with Bevacizumab and Chemotherapeutics in Treating Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Targeted Inactivation of BPTF/VEGF and NF-κB/COX-2 Signaling.

As a kind of proteolytic enzyme extracted from earthworms, lumbrokinase has been used as an antithrombotic drug clinically. Nevertheless, its potential in anti-cancer, especially in anti-non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as a single form of treatment or in combination with other therapies, is still poorly understood. In this study, we explored the anti-tumor role and the responsive molecular mechanisms of lumbrokinase in suppressing tumor angiogenesis and chemoresistance development in NSCLC and its clinical potential in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapeutics. Lumbrokinase was found to inhibit cell proliferation in a concentration-dependent manner and caused metastasis suppression and apoptosis induction to varying degrees in NSCLC cells. Lumbrokinase enhanced the anti-angiogenesis efficiency of bevacizumab by down-regulating BPTF expression, decreasing its anchoring at the VEGF promoter region and subsequent VEGF expression and secretion. Furthermore, lumbrokinase treatment reduced IC50 values of chemotherapeutics and improved their cytotoxicity in parental and chemo-resistant NSCLC cells via inactivating the NF-κB pathway, inhibiting the expression of COX-2 and subsequent secretion of PGE2. LPS-induced NF-κB activation reversed its inhibition on NSCLC cell proliferation and its synergy with chemotherapeutic cytotoxicity, while COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib treatment boosted such effects. Lumbrokinase combined with bevacizumab, paclitaxel, or vincristine inhibited the xenograft growth of NSCLC cells in mice more significantly than a single treatment. In conclusion, lumbrokinase inhibited NSCLC survival and sensitized NSCLC cells to bevacizumab or chemotherapeutics treatment by targeted down-regulation of BPTF/VEGF signaling and inactivation of NF-κB/COX-2 signaling, respectively. The combinational applications of lumbrokinase with bevacizumab or chemotherapeutics are expected to be developed as promising candidate therapeutic strategies to improve the efficacy of the original monotherapy in anti-NSCLC.

A randomized phase III double-blind placebo-controlled trial of first-line chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab for patients with HER2/neu-positive metastatic breast cancer: a trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E1105).

BACKGROUND: In 2008, bevacizumab received accelerated Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for use in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Based on the pre-clinical and preliminary clinical activity of the trastuzumab and bevacizumab combination, ECOG-ACRIN E1105 trial was developed to determine if the addition of bevacizumab to a chemotherapy and trastuzumab combination for first-line therapy would improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2-positive MBC. FINDINGS: 96 patients were randomized to receive standard first-line chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab between November 2007 and October 2009, and 93 began protocol therapy. Induction therapy was given for 24 weeks, followed by maintenance trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab. 60% (56/93) began carboplatin and 74% (69/93) completed 6 cycles of induction therapy. Primary endpoint was PFS. Median PFS was 11.1 and 13.8 months for placebo and bevacizumab arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 95%, Confidence Interval [Cl] for bevacizumab vs. placebo: 0.73 [0.43-1.23], p = 0.24), and at a median follow-up of 70.7 months, median survival was 49.1 and 63 months (HR [95% Cl] for OS: 1.09 [0.61-1.97], p = 0.75). The most common toxicities across both arms were neutropenia and hypertension, with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, fatigue, and sensory neuropathy reported more frequently with bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, the addition of bevacizumab did not improve outcomes in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Although the trial was underpowered due to smaller than anticipated sample size, these findings corroborated other clinical trials during this time. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NCT00520975.