Immediate prepectoral versus submuscular breast reconstruction in nipple-sparing mastectomy: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Objective: To evaluate early complications in prepectoral breast reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective cohort study including 180 consecutive cases of nipple-sparing mastectomy, comparing immediate breast reconstruction with subpectoral to prepectoral mammary implants in 2012-2022. Clinical and demographic characteristics and complications in the first three months following surgery were compared between the two techniques. Results: The prepectoral technique was used in 22 cases (12.2%) and the subpectoral in 158 (87.8%). Median age was higher in the prepectoral group (47 versus 43.8 years; p=0.038), as was body mass index (25.1 versus 23.8; p=0.002) and implant volume (447.5 versus 409 cc; p=0.001). The prepectoral technique was more associated with an inframammary fold (IMF) incision (19 cases, 86.4% versus 85, 53.8%) than with periareolar incisions (3 cases, 13.6% versus 73, 46.2%); (p=0.004). All cases in the prepectoral group underwent direct-to-implant reconstruction compared to 54 cases (34.2%) in the subpectoral group. Thirty-eight complications were recorded: 36 (22.8%) in the subpectoral group and 2 (9.1%) in the prepectoral group (p=0.24). Necrosis of the nipple-areola complex/skin flap occurred in 27 patients (17.1%) in the subpectoral group (prepectoral group: no cases; p=0.04). The groups were comparable regarding dehiscence, seroma, infection, and hematoma. Reconstruction failed in one case per group (p=0.230). In the multivariate analysis, IMF incision was associated with the prepectoral group (aOR: 34.72; 95%CI: 2.84-424.63). Conclusion: The incidence of early complications was comparable between the two techniques and compatible with previous reports. The clinical and demographic characteristics differed between the techniques. Randomized clinical trials are required.

Experimental protocol for evaluation of biomaterials in an in-vivo silicone implant coverage.

PURPOSE: To describe an experimental surgical model in rats using a dual-plane technique for evaluation of biomaterials in an in-vivo silicone implant coverage. METHODS: This study was developed following the ISO 10993-6 standard. In this study, 40 male Wistar rats weighing between 250 and 350 g were used, distributed into two groups: experimental, biomaterial superimposed on the minimammary prosthesis (MP); and control, MP without implantation of the biomaterial, with eight animals at each biological point: 1, 2, 4, 12, and 26 weeks. Thus, at the end of biological points (1, 2, 4, 12, and 26 weeks; n = 8 animals per week), the tissue specimens achieved were fixed in buffered formalin and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. RESULTS: Macroscopically, throughout the study, no postoperative complications were apparent. In the histological analysis, it was possible to observe the evolution of the inflammatory response, tissue repair, and fibrous capsule during the biological points. CONCLUSIONS: The experimental model described in this study proved to be suitable for evaluating the biomaterial used in the coverage of breast silicone implants.

Reacción biológica de la cobertura de poliuretano en los implantes de gel de silicona. Trabajo experimental en ratas / Biological reaction of the polyurethane coating on silicone gel implants. Experimental work in rats

Los implantes de silicona recubiertos con poliuretano vulcanizado han reducido signifi cativamente la incidencia de contractura capsular. La FDA suspendió la venta temporalmente en EE.UU. de estos implantes por estudios que sugerían que el 2,4-TDA, metabolito del poliuretano, podría ser cancerígeno. En el año 1995, y por falta de evidencia que sustentara lo anterior, la FDA autorizó nuevamente su uso, pero aún genera controversias. Es nuestro objetivo demostrar cuál es el grado de reabsorción que sufre el poliuretano en relación con el tiempo de colocado el implante en forma experimental con ratas de laboratorio. Material y métodos. Trabajo prospectivo, experimental y a triple ciego. Se colocó en 18 ratas de laboratorio implantes de gel de silicona recubierto con poliuretano de 2 cc marca Silimed. Se realizó la extracción del implante en bloque a los 3, 6, 12, 18 y 24 meses. Se evaluó el nivel de contractura capsular, el espesor macroscópico de la cápsula y el análisis microscópico de la misma. Resultados. En ninguna de las ratas se objetivó contractura capsular. El espesor promedio de la cápsula fue de 1.88 mm (rango 1,8 a 1,92 mm, n: 18, p<0,5) siendo no signifi cativa en comparación con los 2 mm de recubierta original. A nivel microscópico se objetivó una reacción infl amatoria prolongada, reacción de células gigantes y macrófagos próximos a la cubierta, lo que forma una contractura no lineal. También se observo partículas de poliuretano grandes, rodeadas y ancladas a los macrófagos. Este hallazgo muestra que el poliuretano pasa a formar parte de la cápsula y que no se degrada en forma signifi cativa al menos a los 24 meses de haber sido implantados en ratas. Conclusión. Los hallazgos macroscópicos y microscópicos demuestran que el poliuretano pasa a formar parte de la cápsula y no a degradarse y volcarse a la circulación general como así también la formación de una capsula blanda, cuya correlación clínica, es el menor índice de contractura capsular de este tipo de implante

Polyurethane-covered silicone implants have signifi cantly reduced the incidence of capsular contracture. FDA temporarily suspended this product in EE UU due to studies that suggested 2,4-TDA, polyurethane`s metabolite, may be carcinogenic. In 1995, for lack of evidence to support this, its use was authorize by the FDA again, but still generates controversy. It is our objective to demonstrate wich is the degree of resorption of polyurethane cover, regarding the time the implant is placed, in an experimental laboratory rats. Material and methods: Prospective, experimental and triple blind study. It was placed on 18 laboratory rats 2 cc Polyurethane-covered silicone implants manufactured by Silimed. Implants removal was performed in block at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. It was evaluated the grade of capsular contracture, the macroscopic thickness of the capsule and the microscopic analysis of it. Results: None of the rats evidenced capsular contracture. The average thickness of the capsule was 1.88 mm (range 1.8 to 1.92 mm, n = 18, p <0.5) being not signifi cant compared to the original 2mm coated. The microscopic study evidenced a large infl ammatory reaction, giant cells reaction and macrophages near the coat which makes a nonlinear contracture. Large Polyurethane particles was also observed, surrounded and anchored to macrophages. These fi ndings show that the polyurethane becomes part of the capsule and does not is degraded signifi cantly at least 24 months after being implanted in rats. Conclusion: Macroscopic and microscopic fi ndings demonstrate that the polyurethane coat becomes part of the capsule and is not degraded to go to the general circulation, as well as the formation of a soft capsule, nonlineal, whose clinical correlation, is a lower rate of capsular contracture of this implant

Long-Term Satisfaction with Breast Augmentation and Augmentation Mastopexy in the Latin American Population.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to determine the long-term satisfaction levels of women who have undergone breast augmentation and augmentation mastopexy procedures, while identifying the factors influencing patient satisfaction. METHODS: A self-reported retrospective case study design was used to collect data from women with breast implants. The study employed a survey that included demographic information, preoperative diagnosis, implant details, and patient-reported outcomes measured using the Breast-Q Instrument, which evaluates satisfaction with breasts, self-esteem, sexual well-being, and physical symptoms. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify correlations and differences in outcomes between the different variables. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1022 women from 19 countries, with Chile, Mexico, and Colombia being the most represented. Augmentation was performed on 72.2% of the patients, while 27.7% underwent augmentation mastopexy. Patient satisfaction with breast size and shape varied significantly between the two procedures, with patients undergoing augmentation mastopexy showing less satisfaction. In addition, patients who were unaware of their implant shape or placement reported lower satisfaction scores. The study also found that patient satisfaction decreased over time in the augmentation mastopexy cases and that patients with high body mass index had lower satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Augmentation mastopexy in patients with breast ptosis yields lower satisfaction than augmentation alone. Dissatisfaction escalates with overweight/obesity (BMI), post-surgery time, and misinformation. Implant pocket (pre-vs. subpectoral), shape (round vs. anatomical), and size did not impact satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and management of silicone lymphadenopathy: A systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Implant-based breast augmentations and reconstructions are one of the most common surgical procedures performed by plastic surgeons in the United States, which has rapidly increased in popularity since the 2000s. Silicone lymphadenopathy (SL) is a complication of breast implants that involves migration of silicone to nearby soft tissue/lymph nodes. Data on its clinical features and management is scarce. METHODS: SL-related search terms were used to find articles in 3 databases. Of 598 articles, 101 studies met the inclusion criteria. Demographics, clinical presentation, workup, and management data were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 279 cases of SL and 107 with information on initial diagnosis, 35 (33%) were incidental. The most common symptom was painless lymphadenopathy, followed by painful lymphadenopathy. 251 (95%) and 13 (5%) patients had silicone and saline implants, respectively. 149 (68%) patients had implant rupture. Axillary lymphadenopathy was the most affected region (136 cases, 72%), followed by internal mammary (40 cases, 21%), cervical/supraclavicular (36 cases, 19%), and mediastinal (24 cases, 13%) regions. 25% of patients underwent fine-needle aspiration, 12% core needle biopsy, and 59% excisional biopsy. 32% of cases underwent explantation and/or implant exchange. The most common indication for surgery was implant rupture. Histology showed multinucleated giant cells, large histiocytes, and silicone accumulation. CONCLUSIONS: SL is a complication associated with breast implants. The majority of patients are asymptomatic, and most cases are managed conservatively. Minority need a biopsy and surgical interventions due to abnormal imaging, persistent symptoms, and/or implant rupture. Workup and management should be tailored to the patient.

Linfoma anaplásico de grandes células associado à prótese mamária: revisão de literatura / Anaplastic large cell lymphoma associated with breast prosthesis: literature review

O linfoma anaplásico de células grandes (ALCL) associado a implantes mamários é um distúrbio ainda pouco descrito na literatura, porém o número de casos está crescendo rapidamente. Das poucas centenas de casos que foram publicados até agora, poucos são de pacientes brasileiras. Analisando os dados obtidos, notou-se que o linfoma anaplásico de grandes células se apresenta com dor mamária, derrame periprotético, massa palpável, dentre outras características. Em vista destes aspectos, conclui-se que uma boa investigação deve ser realizada ao surgirem sintomas inespecíficos, independentemente do tempo que a cirurgia foi realizada, uma vez que estas complicações podem ocorrer anos após a cirurgia. O prognóstico é muito bom na maior parte dos casos diagnosticados. No entanto, apesar de algumas teorias, não se concluiu com exatidão, ainda, como e por que os implantes de silicone poderiam desencadear uma resposta linfóide, culminando num ALCL

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) associated with breast implants is a disorder still poorly described in the literature, but the number of cases is rapidly increasing. Of the few hundred cases that have been published so far, few are from Brazilian patients. Analyzing the data obtained, it was noted that anaplastic large cell lymphoma presents with breast pain, periprosthetic effusion, palpable mass, among other characteristics. In view of these aspects, it is concluded that a thorough investigation should be carried out when nonspecific symptoms arise, regardless of the time the surgery was performed, since these complications can occur years after surgery. The prognosis is very good in most diagnosed cases. However, despite some theories, it has not yet been conclusively determined how and why silicone implants could trigger a lymphoid response, culminating in ALCL

Outcomes after elevation of serratus anterior fascia flap versus serratus muscle flap in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction following mastectomy: a prospective study

Abstract Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative pain between SF flap and serratus anterior muscle (SM) in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study that included 53 women diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction from January 2020 to March 2021. Twenty-nine patients (54.7%) had SF elevation, and 24 patients (45.3%) underwent SM elevation. We evaluated patient-reported early postoperative pain on the first day after surgery. Also, it was reported that all surgical complications in the first month and patient reported outcomes (PROs) were measured with the BRECON 23 questionnaire. Results: The serratus fascia group used implants with larger volumes, 407.6 ± 98.9 cc (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the fascial and muscular groups regarding the postoperative pain score reported by the patients (2 versus 3; p = 0.30). Also, there was no difference between the groups regarding early surgical complications and PROs after breast reconstruction. Conclusion: The use of SF seems to cause less morbidity, which makes the technique an alternative to be considered in breast reconstruction. Although there was no statistical difference in postoperative pain scores between the fascia and serratus muscle groups.

Experimental protocol for evaluation of biomaterials in an in-vivo silicone implant coverage

Purpose: To describe an experimental surgical model in rats using a dual-plane technique for evaluation of biomaterials in an in-vivo silicone implant coverage. Methods: This study was developed following the ISO 10993-6 standard. In this study, 40 male Wistar rats weighing between 250 and 350 g were used, distributed into two groups: experimental, biomaterial superimposed on the minimammary prosthesis (MP); and control, MP without implantation of the biomaterial, with eight animals at each biological point: 1, 2, 4, 12, and 26 weeks. Thus, at the end of biological points (1, 2, 4, 12, and 26 weeks; n = 8 animals per week), the tissue specimens achieved were fixed in buffered formalin and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Results: Macroscopically, throughout the study, no postoperative complications were apparent. In the histological analysis, it was possible to observe the evolution of the inflammatory response, tissue repair, and fibrous capsule during the biological points. Conclusions: The experimental model described in this study proved to be suitable for evaluating the biomaterial used in the coverage of breast silicone implants.

Histomorphological evaluation of acellularized bovine pericardium in breast implant coverage.

Bovine pericardium (BP) has been used as a biomaterial for several decades in many medical applications particularly due to its mechanical properties and the high collagen content. In the acellular form it favors faster tissue repair, providing a three-dimensional support for cellular and vascular events observed during tissue repair and due, to a low elastin content, may favor its use as a breast implant cover, resulting in a low possibility of contracture of the biomaterial, preventing the appearance of irregularities during the reconstruction process. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate, histomorphologically, the behavior of acellularized bovine pericardium (ABP) as a mammary implant cover in rats. For this purpose, 16 animals were divided into two groups, with eight animals at each biological point: 7 and 15 days after surgery. Of the 16 animals, 32 specimens were obtained: 16 in the experimental group (EG) and 16 in the control group (CG). Throughout this study, none of the studied groups had postoperative complications. Results: The histomorphological results showed, in the two biological points, both in the EG and in the CG, chronic inflammatory infiltrate, leukocyte fibrin exudate, formation of granulation tissue and deposition of collagen fibers, more evident in the EG, regressive along the biological points. At 15 days, the implanted ABP showed initial biointegration with the fibrous capsule and surrounding tissues of the recipient bed. Conclusion: These results indicate that the due to the observed favorable tissue response ABP may be of potential use as a breast implant cover.

Prevalence of risk factors associated with development of capsular contracture after placement of breast implants.

OBJECTIVE: To determinate the prevalence of the main risk factors associated with development of capsular contracture after placement of breast implants in a referral center. METHOD: Retrospect study on 210 patients where sociodemographic variables, Baker's clinical scale and histopathological results were recorded. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of 210 patients was performed; 98.1% were women. The average age was 47 years (± 11), body mass index 25 (± 10) and onset of symptoms 13 years (± 8.5). Sociodemographic factors: domestic work 63.3%. Alcoholism 70% and smoking 65.7%. The main reason for consultation was pain plus deformity in 81.6%. The risk factors with statistical significance were the history of trauma, with 83.3% (p = 0.004), and the subglandular plane, with 73.8% (p = 0.0115). Histopathology: fibrous capsule 81.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of the risk factors described are similar to those reported in the literature. Only for the history of trauma and the subglandular plane there was statistical significance.

OBJETIVO: Determinar la prevalencia de los principales factores de riesgo asociados a contractura capsular posterior a mamoplastia de aumento en un centro de referencia. MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo de 210 pacientes en el que se registraron variables sociodemográficas, escala clínica de Baker y resultados histopatológicos. RESULTADOS: Se realizó el análisis estadístico de 210 pacientes; el 98.1% fueron mujeres. La edad promedio fue de 47 años (± 11), el índice de masa corporal 25 kg/m2 (± 10) y el inicio de los síntomas 13 años (± 8.5). Factores sociodemográficos: labores domésticas 63.3%. Alcoholismo 70% y tabaquismo 65.7%. El principal motivo de consulta fue dolor más deformidad, en el 81.6%. Los factores de riesgo con significancia estadística fueron el antecedente de traumatismo, con un 83.3% (p = 0.004), y el plano subglandular, con un 73.8% (p = 0.0115). Histopatología: cápsula fibrosa 81.4%. CONCLUSIONES: La prevalencia de los factores de riesgo descritos es similar a lo reportado en la literatura. Solo para el antecedente de traumatismo y el plano subglandular hubo significancia estadística.

Evaluation of Perioperative Versus Extended Courses of Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IIBR) is the most commonly used method in breast reconstruction in the United States. However, postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs) can cause devastating reconstructive failure. This study evaluates the use of perioperative versus extended courses of antibiotic prophylaxis after IIBR for the prevention of SSI. METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent IIBR between June 2018 and April 2020. Detailed demographic and clinical information was collected. Patients were divided into subgroups based on antibiotic prophylaxis regimen: group 1 consisted of patients who received 24 hours of perioperative antibiotics and group 2 consisted of patients who received ≥7 days of antibiotics. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSSv26.0 with P ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients (285 breasts) who underwent IIBR were included. The mean age was 52.4 ± 10.2 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.8 ± 5.7 kg/m2. Twenty-five percent of patients (25.6%) underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy, 69.1% skin-sparing mastectomy, and 5.3% total mastectomy. The implant was placed in the prepectoral, subpectoral, and dual planes in 16.7%, 19.2%, and 64.1% cases, respectively. Acellular dermal matrix was used in 78.7% of cases. A total of 42.0% of patients received 24-hour prophylaxis (group 1), and 58.0% of patients received extended prophylaxis (group 2). Twenty-five infections (14.8%) were identified, of which 9 (5.3%) resulted in reconstructive failure. In bivariate analyses, no significant difference was found between groups in rates of infection (P = 0.273), reconstructive failure (P = 0.653), and seroma (P = 0.125). There was a difference in hematoma rates between groups (P = 0.046). Interestingly, in patients who received only perioperative antibiotics, infection rates were significantly higher in those with BMI ≥ 25 (25.6% vs 7.1%, P = 0.050). There was no difference in overweight patients who received extended antibiotics (16.4% vs 7.0%, P = 0.160). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate no statistical difference in infection rates between perioperative and extended antibiotics. This suggests that the efficacies of current prophylaxis regimens are largely similar, with choice of regimen based on surgeon preference and patient-specific considerations. Infection rates in patients who received perioperative prophylaxis and were overweight were significantly higher, suggesting that BMI should be taken into consideration when choosing a prophylaxis regimen.

Silicone breast implants may contribute to early-onset fetal growth restriction.

INTRODUCTION: There are many studies showing that silicone breast implants may affect lactation, but few analyzed whether these implants affect placentation. We observed that many mothers with growth-restricted pregnancies had inflammatory conditions, such as silicone breast implants or giardiasis. METHODS: This single-center cohort study assessed the prevalence of inflammatory conditions in normotensive growth-restricted singleton pregnancies. Next, we stratified the patients according to the presence or absence of silicone breast implants, to determine whether these implants influence fetal growth restriction onset or severity. RESULTS: Twelve (32%) of the 38 participants underwent cosmetic breast augmentation 4-18 years before pregnancy. Half of the patients with and 38% without silicone breast implants had giardiasis. Half of the mothers with and 35% without silicone breast implants had autoantibodies. Silicone breast implants were associated with a 70% increased risk of fetal growth restriction before 32 weeks' gestation (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.5). Fetal growth restriction was diagnosed significantly earlier in mothers with than in those without silicone breast implants, respectively at 27 (95% CI, 25-30) and 30 weeks' gestation (95% CI, 29-32). Silicone breast implants also tripled the risk of fetuses being below the third percentile, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the association of inflammatory conditions, such as silicone breast implants, giardiasis, and autoantibodies may contribute to placental insufficiency. Silicone breast implants older than four years increased the risk of early-onset fetal growth restriction. Studies with large samples are needed to validate our findings and define whether silicone-related fetal growth restriction should be included in autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) criteria. Key Points • Fetal growth restriction (FGR), responsible for 30% of stillbirths, is the most common cause of prematurity and intrapartum asphyxia. • In this study, including 38 mothers with normotensive FGR, all participants had 2-4 inflammatory conditions, such as giardiasis, sinusitis, candidiasis, dysbiosis, extreme fear or autoantibodies. • Silicone breast implants were associated with a 70% increased risk of fetal growth restriction before 32 weeks' gestation. • FGR was diagnosed at 27 weeks' gestation (95% CI, 25-30) in mothers with and at 30 weeks' gestation (95% CI, 29-32) in mothers without silicone breast implants.

[Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants. Case report]. / Síndrome autoinmunitario/inflamatorio inducido por adyuvantes. Reporte de caso.

Background: The indiscriminate application of substances for aesthetic purposes, such as silicone in breast implants, leads to the production of common local signs such as inflammation, skin irregularities, edema, erythema, vascular neoformations, and ulcers, which can evolve into general symptoms such as fever, asthenia, weakness, arthralgia or activate the immune system abnormally, causing the appearance of autoimmune diseases. This set of signs and symptoms is called adjuvant-induced autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome. Clinical case: We present the case of a 50-year-old woman with a history of silicone-based breast implants who spontaneously developed a hemorrhagic coagulopathy, type A acquired hemophilia was documented, that is, autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII. Thanks to the work of a multidisciplinary team, it is possible to successfully diagnose and treat the patient with bridging agents, implant removal and management of associated symptoms. Conclusion: the importance of knowing the pathology is recognized, which, although it is rare, when it occurs has a high mortality rate if it is not diagnosed and treated on time.

Introducción: la aplicación de sustancias con fines estéticos de forma indiscriminada, como es el caso de la silicona en los implantes mamarios, llevan a la producción de signos locales comunes como: inflamación, irregularidad en la piel, edema, eritema, neoformaciones vasculares y úlceras, que pueden evolucionar a síntomas generales como la fiebre, astenia, adinamia, artralgias o a activar, de manera anómala, el sistema inmunitario, causando la aparición de enfermedades autoinmunitarias. A este conjunto de signos y síntomas se le denomina síndrome autoinmunitario/inflamatorio inducido por adyuvantes. Caso clínico: presentamos el caso de una mujer de 50 años con antecedente de implantes mamarios a base de silicona que desarrolla, de manera espontánea, una coagulopatía hemorrágica, se documenta hemofilia tipo A adquirida, es decir, autoanticuerpos contra el factor VIII de la coagulación. Gracias al trabajo de un equipo multidisciplinario se consigue diagnosticar y tratar de manera exitosa a la paciente con agentes de puente, remoción de los implantes y manejo de los síntomas asociados. Conclusión: se reconoce la importancia de conocer la patología que, si bien es rara, cuando se presenta tiene alta tasa de mortalidad si no se diagnostica y trata a tiempo.

Reconstrucción mamaria inmediata prepectoral / Immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction

Introducción. La reconstrucción mamaria inmediata con implantes prepectorales permite realizar la mastectomía oncológica con un resultado estético en un solo tiempo quirúrgico y con menor morbilidad del área dadora. Las indicaciones son precisas, en directa relación con las condiciones de la mastectomía. Material y métodos. Se presentan 83 pacientes en el período comprendido entre febrero de 2020 a febrero de 2022 con mastectomías uni- y bilaterales, con conservación del complejo areola-pezón los cuales fueron injertados en 7 casos. La incisión en surco submamario se realizó en 60 casos, radiada externa en 8 casos, vertical en 8 casos y 7 casos con patrón de reducción en el Instituto Oncológico Alexander Fleming. Los criterios de exclusión que utilizamos son tumores mamarios a menos de 1 cm del complejo areola pezón y tumores localmente avanzados. Resultados. En total se realizaron 98 mastectomías, de las cuales 86 fueron terapéuticas y 12 profilácticas por mutaciones genéticas. La extracción de ganglios se realizó por una incisión axilar, excepto en el patrón de reducción donde se realizó a través de la incisión de la mastectomía. En 42 pacientes se utilizaron implantes anatómicos y en 56 casos redondos texturizados. El seguimiento de las pacientes fue a 25 meses. Conclusión. La reconstrucción mamaria prepectoral lleva a la reconstrucción de la mama en el mismo espacio con una baja morbilidad y resultado natural. Las indicaciones para esta técnica deben ser muy precisas para lograr obtener los resultados deseados. En nuestra experiencia, la reconstrucción mamaria inmediata con implante directo es una técnica segura y reproducible, con excelentes resultados en pacientes en las que está debidamente indicada la técnica, con una baja tasa de complicaciones y disminución en el tiempo de tratamiento y de recuperación.

Introduction. Immediate breast reconstruction with pre pectoral implants allows to perform oncologic mastectomy with an aesthetic result in a single surgical time and with less morbidity of the donor area. The indications are precise and directly related to the conditions of the mastectomy. Material and methods. We present 83 patients in the period from February 2020 to February 2022 with uni and bilateral mastectomies, with preservation of the nipple-areola complex which was grafted in 7 cases. The incision in the submammary sulcus was performed in 60 cases, external radiated in 8 cases, vertical in 8 cases and 7 with reduction pattern at the Alexander Fleming Oncological Institute. The exclusion criteria we used are breast tumors less than 1 cm from the nipple areola complex and locally advanced tumors. Results. A total of 98 mastectomies were performed, of which 86 were therapeutic and 12 prophylactic for genetic mutations. Node removal was performed through an axillary incision, except in the reduction pattern where it was performed through the mastectomy incision. Anatomical implants were used in 42 patients and textured round implants in 56 cases. The follow-up of the patients was 25 months. Conclusion. Pre pectoral breast reconstruction leads to reconstruction of the breast in the same space with low morbidity and natural results. The indications for this technique must be very precise to achieve the desired results. In our experience, immediate breast reconstruction with direct implant is a safe and reproductible technique, with excellent results in patients in whom the technique is properly indicated, with a low rate of complications and decrease in treatment and recovery time.

Abscesos mamarios múltiples por Mycobacterium abscessus en mastopexia secundaria con implantes mamarios / Multiple breast abscesses due to Mycobacterium abscessus in secondary mastopexy with breast implant

Las infecciones periprotésicas son una complicación poco frecuente en cirugía de implantes mamarios, pero de difícil resolución si son causadas por gérmenes como las micobacterias. Mycobacterium abscessus es una micobacteria no tuberculosa de rápido crecimiento, que se presenta de manera atípica, generando abscesos y fístulas cutáneas. En este reporte presentamos el caso de una paciente que fue intervenida por recambio de implantes mamarios y mastopexia secundaria. La paciente presentó un seroma temprano como manifestación inicial y posteriormente desarrolló múltiples abscesos en todo el parénquima mamario. El tratamiento instaurado en la paciente fue la extracción del implante mamario,curaciones diarias de la herida, antibioticoterapia prolongada y punciones periódicas guiadas por ecografía, con cultivo del material obtenido. El objetivo de nuestro reporte fue presentar esta complicación generada por un germen poco frecuente, su forma de presentación, diagnóstico y el tratamiento establecido

Although periprosthetic infections are a rare complication in breast implant surgery, they are difficult to resolve if they entail germs like mycobacteria. Mycobacterium abscessus is a rapidly growing, nontuberculous mycobacterium that occurs atypically and generates abscesses and cutaneous fistulas. In this report, we present the case of a patient that underwent surgery for a breast implant replacement and a secondary mastopexy. The initial manifestation the patient evinced was an early seroma. Later, she developed multiple abscesses in all the breast parenchyma. The treatment established for the patient involved extracting the breast implant, daily cleaning and dressing of the wound, prolonged antibiotic therapy, and periodical punctures guided by ultrasound, accompanied by culture sampling. The aim of this report is to present this infrequent germ-generated complication, its form of manifestation, its diagnosis, and the established treatment.

Subfascial Axillary Hybrid Breast Augmentation: Technical Highlights and Step-by-Step Video Guide.

SUMMARY: Advances in breast augmentation techniques have led to safety improvements and better aesthetic results. The concurrent combination of the axillary approach with a subfascial pocket has been suggested for augmentation procedures, because it avoids breast scarring and the limitations of submuscular positioning represented by breast animation when the pectoral muscle is contracted. With the improvement of autogenous fat grafting techniques, new implant coverage options and more natural results have been proposed with more superficial implant pockets; simultaneous autogenous fat grafting with silicone implants (defined as hybrid breast augmentation) has recently been evaluated as a promising technique. Combining these two procedures allows core volume projection and natural cleavage while camouflaging implant edges. Fat grafting is also useful in reducing intermammary distance and achieving a smaller and smoother transition between the breasts. This article and the accompanying videos provide a detailed, step-by-step guide to hybrid breast augmentation using a subfascial axillary approach, with a predictable and optimized surgical outcome.