The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in immune-oncology era (SEVURO-CN): study protocol for a multi-center, prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains unclear in the immuno-oncology (IO) era. The results of two randomized trials, CARMENA and SURTIME, questioned the role and timing of CN. However, despite the latest advances in the systemic treatment of mRCC, previous trials have only used targeted therapy, and no studies have fully investigated the role of CN in immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) settings, and there is an urgent need for future studies to better define the role and timing of CN. METHODS: This study is an open-label, multi-center, parallel, prospective, randomized, interventional clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of CN in combination with CPIs in mRCC patients with International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate- and poor-risk. Synchronous mRCC patients with ≤ 3 IMDC risk features will be randomly allocated to three groups (1, upfront CN; 2, deferred CN; and 3, systemic therapy [ST] only). For ST, the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination regimen, one of the standard regimens for intermediate- and poor-risk mRCC, is chosen. The primary endpoint is overall survival. The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, objective response rate, number of participants with treatment-related adverse events, and number of participants with surgical morbidity. We will analyze the genetic mutation profiles of the tumor tissue, circulating tumor DNA, urine tumor DNA, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. The gut and urine microbial communities will be analyzed. The study will begin in 2022 and will enroll 55 patients. DISCUSSION: This study is one of the few prospective randomized trials to evaluate the benefit of CN in the treatment of synchronous mRCC in the IO era. The SEVURO-CN trial will help identify the role and timing of CN, thereby rediscovering the value of CN. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05753839. Registered on 3 March 2023.

[A Case of Metastatic Renal Cancer Responding to Sunitinib as the Eighth Line Therapy].

A 62-year-old male presenting with gross hematuria and right renal mass was referred to our Urology Department. Computed tomography revealed a right renal mass, with multiple pulmonary lesions. He underwent right nephrectomy for highly suspected renal cell carcinoma with pulmonary metastases (cT3aN0M1). The pathological diagnosis was clear cell renal cell carcinoma, pT1b. Following surgery, he was treated with multiple regimens of chemotherapy, ranging from interferon alpha, multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sorafenib, axitinib, pazopanib and cabozantinib, everolimus, and nivolumab, all of which were discontinued after its induction, either due to adverse events or progressive disease. He was finally administered Sunitinib as the 8th line "last-ditch" treatment, which resulted in significant tumor shrinkage. No disease progression has been observed 25 months after initiating sunitinib administration.

Not always a miracle - The case of the missing metastasis.

Spontaneous regression of malignant neoplasms is extremely rare, but renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are most often associated with this phenomenon. We report a case of a patient with personal history of RCC, who underwent nephrectomy and no other oncological treatment. One year after nephrectomy, a lung metastasis was detected and kept under follow-up for 3 years. Its size increased over time until a needle biopsy was performed, and its metastatic nature confirmed. Wedge resection of the lung nodule was performed, and no neoplastic cells were found, suggesting its spontaneous regression after biopsy. Different theories have been proposed to explain this phenomenon and, in most cases, the mechanism seems to involve the activation of the immune system. This case supports the importance of reducing tumor burden and the impact of the disturbance of the tumor microenvironment caused by instrumentation, in improving immune system activation and its essential role in neoplasm regression.

(Bio)marqueurs de « routine ¼ dans le cancer du rein métastatique.

Routine (bio)markers in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BIGH3 mediates apoptosis and gap junction failure in osteocytes during renal cell carcinoma bone metastasis progression.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) bone metastatis progression is driven by crosstalk between tumor cells and the bone microenvironment, which includes osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes. RCC bone metastases (RCCBM) are predominantly osteolytic and resistant to antiresorptive therapy. The molecular mechanisms underlying pathologic osteolysis and disruption of bone homeostasis remain incompletely understood. We previously reported that BIGH3/TGFBI (transforming growth factor-beta-induced protein ig-h3, shortened to BIGH3 henceforth) secreted by colonizing RCC cells drives osteolysis by inhibiting osteoblast differentiation, impairing healing of osteolytic lesions, which is reversible with osteoanabolic agents. Here, we report that BIGH3 induces osteocyte apoptosis in both human RCCBM tissue specimens and in a preclinical mouse model. We also demonstrate that BIGH3 reduces Cx43 expression, blocking gap junction (GJ) function and osteocyte network communication. BIGH3-mediated GJ inhibition is blocked by the lysosomal inhibitor hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), but not osteoanabolic agents. Our results broaden the understanding of pathologic osteolysis in RCCBM and indicate that targeting the BIGH3 mechanism could be a combinational strategy for the treatment of RCCBM-induced bone disease that overcomes the limited efficacy of antiresorptives that target osteoclasts.

ALK Inhibition With Alectinib for Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma With ALK Rearrangement: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review.

ALK-rearranged RCC refractory to several lines of treatment has a durable response when treated with alectinib.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Nephrectomy is the surgical removal of all or part of a kidney. When the aim of nephrectomy is to reduce tumor burden in people with established metastatic disease, the procedure is called cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). CN is typically combined with systemic anticancer therapy (SACT). SACT can be initiated before or immediately after the operation or deferred until radiological signs of disease progression. The benefits and harms of CN are controversial. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of cytoreductive nephrectomy combined with systemic anticancer therapy versus systemic anticancer therapy alone or watchful waiting in newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma. SEARCH METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, two trial registries, and other gray literature sources up to 1 March 2024. We applied no restrictions on publication language or status. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated SACT and CN versus SACT alone or watchful waiting. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. Primary outcomes were time to death from any cause and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were time to disease progression, treatment response, treatment-related mortality, discontinuation due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: Our search identified 10 records of four unique RCTs that informed two comparisons. In this abstract, we focus on the results for the two primary outcomes. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus systemic anticancer therapy versus systemic anticancer therapy alone Three RCTs informed this comparison. Due to the considerable heterogeneity when pooling across these studies, we decided to present the results of the prespecified subgroup analysis by type of systemic agent. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus interferon immunotherapy versus interferon immunotherapy alone CN plus interferon immunotherapy compared with interferon immunotherapy alone probably increases time to death from any cause (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 0.89; I²= 0%; 2 studies, 326 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Assuming 820 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive interferon immunotherapy alone, the effect estimate corresponds to 132 fewer all-cause deaths (237 fewer to 37 fewer) per 1000 people who receive CN plus interferon immunotherapy. We found no evidence to assess quality of life. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy versus tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy alone We are very uncertain about the effect of CN plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy compared with TKI therapy alone on time to death from any cause (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.37; 1 study, 450 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Assuming 574 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive TKI therapy alone, the effect estimate corresponds to 38 more all-cause deaths (38 fewer to 115 more) per 1000 people who receive CN plus TKI therapy. We found no evidence to assess quality of life. Immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy versus deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy One study evaluated CN followed by TKI therapy (immediate CN) versus three cycles of TKI therapy followed by CN (deferred CN). Immediate CN compared with deferred CN may decrease time to death from any cause (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.53; 1 study, 99 participants; low-certainty evidence). Assuming 620 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive deferred CN, the effect estimate corresponds to 173 more all-cause deaths (18 more to 294 more) per 1000 people who receive immediate CN. We found no evidence to assess quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: CN plus SACT in the form of interferon immunotherapy versus SACT in the form of interferon immunotherapy alone probably increases time to death from any cause. However, we are very uncertain about the effect of CN plus SACT in the form of TKI therapy versus SACT in the form of TKI therapy alone on time to death from any cause. Immediate CN versus deferred CN may decrease time to death from any cause. We found no quality of life data for any of these three comparisons. We also found no evidence to inform any other comparisons, in particular those involving newer immunotherapy agents (programmed death receptor 1 [PD-1]/programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] immune checkpoint inhibitors), which have become the backbone of SACT for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. There is an urgent need for RCTs that explore the role of CN in the context of contemporary forms of systemic immunotherapy.

Therapeutic options for different metastatic sites arising from renal cell carcinoma: A review.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) stands among the top 10 malignant neoplasms with the highest fatality rates. It exhibits pronounced heterogeneity and robust metastatic behavior. Patients with RCC may present with solitary or multiple metastatic lesions at various anatomical sites, and their prognoses are contingent upon the site of metastasis. When deliberating the optimal therapeutic approach for a patient, thorough evaluation of significant risk factors such as the feasibility of complete resection, the presence of oligometastases, and the patient's functional and physical condition is imperative. Recognizing the nuanced differences in RCC metastasis to distinct organs proves advantageous in contemplating potential treatment modalities aimed at optimizing survival outcomes. Moreover, discerning the metastatic site holds promise for enhancing risk stratification in individuals with metastatic RCC. This review summarizes the recent data pertaining to the current status of different RCC metastatic sites and elucidates their role in informing clinical management strategies across diverse metastatic locales of RCC.

The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio as a significant inflammatory marker associated with survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated using nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) is the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). While approximately 40% of patients treated with NIVO + IPI achieve a durable response, 20% develop primary resistance with severe consequences. Therefore, there is a clinical need for criteria to select patients suitable for NIVO + IPI therapy to optimize its therapeutic efficacy. Accordingly, our aim was to evaluate the association between candidate biomarkers measured before treatment initiation and survival. METHODS: This was a multi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study of 183 patients with mRCC treated with systematic therapies between August 2015 and July 2023. Of these, 112 received NIVO + IPI as first-line therapy: mean age, 68 years; men, 83.0% (n = 93), and clear cell histology, 80.4% (n = 90). Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate associations between biomarkers and survival. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, high C-reactive protein and systemic index, a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and a low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were associated with shorter overall survival (OS). On multivariable analysis, a LMR ≤ 3 was retained as an independent factor associated to shorter OS with the highest accuracy (C-index, 0.656; hazard ratio, 7.042; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-25.0; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: A low LMR may identify patients who would be candidate for NIVO + IPI therapy for mRCC.

Delphi consensus on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma-a European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology study endorsed by the European Association of Urology.

The purpose of this European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) project, endorsed by the European Association of Urology, is to explore expert opinion on the management of patients with oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma by means of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on extracranial metastases, with the aim of developing consensus recommendations for patient selection, treatment doses, and concurrent systemic therapy. A questionnaire on SABR in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma was prepared by a core group and reviewed by a panel of ten prominent experts in the field. The Delphi consensus methodology was applied, sending three rounds of questionnaires to clinicians identified as key opinion leaders in the field. At the end of the third round, participants were able to find consensus on eight of the 37 questions. Specifically, panellists agreed to apply no restrictions regarding age (25 [100%) of 25) and primary renal cell carcinoma histology (23 [92%] of 25) for SABR candidates, on the upper threshold of three lesions to offer ablative treatment in patients with oligoprogression, and on the concomitant administration of immune checkpoint inhibitor. SABR was indicated as the treatment modality of choice for renal cell carcinoma bone oligometatasis (20 [80%] of 25) and for adrenal oligometastases 22 (88%). No consensus or major agreement was reached regarding the appropriate schedule, but the majority of the poll (54%-58%) retained the every-other-day schedule as the optimal choice for all the investigated sites. The current ESTRO Delphi consensus might provide useful direction for the application of SABR in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma and highlight the key areas of ongoing debate, perhaps directing future research efforts to close knowledge gaps.

High serum sodium predicts immunotherapy response in metastatic renal cell and urothelial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The development of reliable biomarkers for the prediction of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and urothelial carcinoma (mUC) remains an unresolved challenge. Conventional ICI biomarkers typically focus on tumor-related factors such as PD-L1 expression. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the predictive value of serum electrolyte levels, a so far widely unexplored area, is still pending. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of baseline sodium, potassium, chloride, magnesium and calcium levels in two independent phase 3 clinical trials: IMvigor211 for mUC comparing atezolizumab to chemotherapy, and IMmotion151 for mRCC comparing atezolizumab+bevacizumab to sunitinib. This analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of these electrolyte levels in these clinical settings. A total of 1787 patients (IMvigor211 n = 901; IMmotion151 n = 886) were analyzed. RESULTS: We found a linear correlation of baseline serum sodium and chloride with prognosis across both trials, which was not found for potassium, magnesium and calcium. In multivariate analysis, the prognostic capacity of sodium was limited to patients receiving ICI as compared to the control group. Interestingly, in both studies, the chance of achieving an objective response was highest in the patient subgroup with high baseline serum sodium levels of > 140 mmol/L (IMmotion151: Complete response in 17.9% versus 2.0% in patients with mRCC with baseline sodium < 135 mmol/L). Serum sodium outperformed tumor PD-L1 expression as a predictor for immunotherapy efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients exhibiting elevated serum sodium levels derive the greatest benefit from immunotherapy, suggesting that baseline serum concentration could serve as a valuable and cost-effective predictive biomarker for immunotherapy across entities.

Pulmonary lesion after surgery for renal cancer: progression or new primary?

PURPOSE: To investigate clinical and radiological differences between kidney metastases to the lung (RCCM +) and metachronous lung cancer (LC) detected during follow-up in patients surgically treated for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: cM0 surgically-treated RCC who harbored a pulmonary mass during follow-up were retrospectively scrutinized. Univariate logistic regression assessed predictive features for differentiating between LC and RCCM + . Multivariable analyses (MVA) were fitted to predict factors that could influence time between detection and histological diagnosis of the pulmonary mass, and how this interval could impact on survivals. RESULTS: 87% had RCCM + and 13% had LC. LC were more likely to have smoking history (75% vs. 29%, p < 0.001) and less aggressive RCC features (cT1-2: 94% vs. 65%, p = 0.01; pT1-2: 88% vs. 41%, p = 0.02; G1-2: 88% vs. 37%, p < 0.001). The median interval between RCC surgery and lung mass detection was longer between LC (55 months [32.8-107.2] vs. 20 months [9.0-45.0], p = 0.01). RCCM + had a higher likelihood of multiple (3[1-4] vs. 1[1-1], p < 0.001) and bilateral (51% vs. 6%, p = 0.002) pulmonary nodules, whereas LC usually presented with a solitary pulmonary nodule, less than 20 mm. Univariate analyses revealed that smoking history (OR:0.79; 95% CI 0.70-0.89; p < 0.001) and interval between RCC surgery and lung mass detection (OR:0.99; 95% CI 0.97-1.00; p = 0.002) predicted a higher risk of LC. Conversely, size (OR:1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.04; p = 0.003), clinical stage (OR:1.14; 95% CI 1.06-1.23; p < 0.001), pathological stage (OR:1.14; 95% CI 1.07-1.22; p < 0.001), grade (OR:1.15; 95% CI 1.07-1.23; p < 0.001), presence of necrosis (OR:1.17; 95% CI 1.04-1.32; p = 0.01), and lymphovascular invasion (OR:1.18; 95% CI 1.01-1.37; p = 0.03) of primary RCC predicted a higher risk of RCCM + . Furthermore, number (OR:1.08; 95% CI 1.04-1.12; p < 0.001) and bilaterality (OR:1.23; 95% CI 1.09-1.38; p < 0.001) of pulmonary lesions predicted a higher risk of RCCM + . Survival analysis showed a median second PFS of 10.9 years (95% CI 3.3-not reached) for LC and a 3.8 years (95% CI 3.2-8.4) for RCCM + . The median OS time was 6.5 years (95% CI 4.4-not reached) for LC and 6 years (95% CI 4.3-11.6) for RCCM + . CONCLUSIONS: Smoking history, primary grade and stage of RCC, interval between RCC surgery and lung mass detection, and number of pulmonary lesions appear to be the most valuable predictors for differentiating new primary lung cancer from RCC progression.