Predicting gallstone pancreatitis in HIV infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, low cluster of differentiation (CD)4 counts and antiretroviral therapy can cause cholestasis and raised transaminases. In acute pancreatitis, this may render biochemical predictors of a gallstone aetiology inaccurate. METHODS: In a prospective observational study, acute pancreatitis was diagnosed by standard criteria. Cholecystolithiasis and bile duct diameter were diagnosed by ultrasound. Cholestasis was defined as two of the following: bilirubin ≥ 21 umol/l, γ glutamyl transferase ≥ 78 U/l, alkaline phosphatase ≥ 121 U/l. Cholangitis was defined as cholestasis and any two sepsis criteria: (temperature > 38˚C, WCC > 12.6 ×109/L, pulse > 90 beats/min). Cholangitis, cholestasis, and bile duct diameter greater that 1 cm were indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). These parameters' ability to predict gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) and choledocholithiasis were compared in HIV+ve and HIV-ve patients. RESULTS: Sixty-two (26%) of 216 patients had GSP. Twenty four were HIV+ve patients. More HIV+ve patients had cholestasis (p = 0.059) and ERCP (p = 0.004). In HIV+ve patients alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 100 U/L, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) > 2 upper limit of normal and cholestasis had a negative predictive value of 92%, 96.7% and 95.2% respectively. In HIV-ve patients, negative predictive value (NPV) was 84%, 83.8% and 84.6% respectively. Bile duct stones were demonstrated at ERCP in 6 (25%) and 3 (8%) of HIV+ve and HIV-ve patients respectively (p = 0.077). Five of 14 ERCP patients had no bile duct stones. HIV+ve and HIV-ve groups had two deaths each. CONCLUSION: Absence at presentation of the abnormal parameters analysed were good predictors of a non-gallstone aetiology particularly in HIV+ve patients. Prior, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) would reduce the number of non-therapeutic ERCPs.

The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of hepatic cystic Echinococcus in a high HIV prevalence population: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a useful, minimally invasive intervention in managing complicated hepatic cystic echinococcosis (HCE). This study aims to assess the use of ERCP in a South African HCE cohort with and without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection. METHODS: An analysis was performed of patients with HCE who were assessed for surgery and underwent ERCP at a tertiary hospital in South Africa between 2011 and 2023. Demographics, clinical data, imaging characteristics, operative management, and postoperative complications were compared between HIV-negative (HIV-) and HIV-positive (HIV+) cohorts. RESULTS: Of the 91 patients assessed, 45 (mean age 34.6 years, 73.3% females, 23 HIV+) required ERCP. HIV status did not significantly affect cyst characteristics or surgical outcomes. HIV+ patients had a higher incidence of intraoperative bile leaks (p = 0.025). There were 18 patients who underwent preoperative ERCPs, mainly for biliary-cyst complications primarily causing obstructive jaundice. A total of 40 patients required postoperative ERCPs, mainly for bile leaks. There were no ERCP-related mortalities and only one case of pancreatitis. ERCP success rates were comparable in both cohorts, with an overall success rate of 86.7%. CONCLUSION: HIV co-infection did not significantly impact the clinical course or outcomes of cystic echinococcosis (CE) patients undergoing ERCP. Perioperative ERCP proved effective in managing biliary complications of HCE as well as postoperative complications, regardless of HIV status. This study underscores the importance of endoscopic interventions in the comprehensive management of CE.

Augmented-reality-based surgical navigation for endoscope retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A phantom study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscope retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a standard surgical treatment for gallbladder and pancreatic diseases. However, surgeons is at high risk and require sufficient surgical experience and skills. METHODS: (1) The simultaneous localisation and mapping technique to reconstruct the surgical environment. (2) The preoperative 3D model is transformed into the intraoperative video environment to implement the multi-modal fusion. (3) A framework for virtual-to-real projection based on hand-eye alignment. For the purpose of projecting the 3D model onto the imaging plane of the camera, it uses position data from electromagnetic sensors. RESULTS: Our AR-assisted navigation system can accurately guide physicians, which means a distance of registration error to be restricted to under 5 mm and a projection error of 5.76 ± 2.13, and the intubation procedure is done at 30 frames per second. CONCLUSIONS: Coupled with clinical validation and user studies, both the quantitative and qualitative results indicate that our navigation system has the potential to be highly useful in clinical practice.

How Can We Ensure that the Perioperative Management of Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is Safe?

Null.

Fatal pulmonary bile embolism associated with acute pancreatitis - a case report and review of the literature.

A 27-year-old woman with jaundice and abdominal pain was admitted to an emergency ward. The diagnostic process showed that gallstones were causing her symptoms. The patient was treated via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and during the procedure she suffered a cardiac arrest. Autopsy findings included multiple pulmonary bile emboli as well as features of disseminated intravascular coagulation. Among 22 thus far described cases of bile pulmonary embolism, 13 were associated with medical procedures involving the liver and biliary tract. We present the case report of a pulmonary bile embolism associated with acute pancreatitis treated via ERCP in a woman with gallbladder bile stones.

Outcomes of asymptomatic common bile duct stones detected at intraoperative cholangiography.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of common bile duct stones (CBDS) in asymptomatic patients at laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and intra-operative cholangiogram (IOC). METHODS: All patients undergoing LC and IOC at Te Whatu Ora - Health New Zealand Waikato between January 2017 and January 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Electronic records were screened for asymptomatic CBDS. Exclusion criteria were hyperbilirubinaemia, gallstone pancreatitis, cholangitis and imaging-detected CBDS. IOC reports were reviewed to determine presence of CBDS. A second blinded review was undertaken by a radiologist. Outcomes were use of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP), complications and readmission with retained CBDS. RESULTS: Included were 1,297 patients undergoing LC and IOC. Of these, 150 (24.1%) patients had a positive IOC, of which 58 (38.7%) were asymptomatic. Attempted flushing of CBDS was employed in 49 cases, 10 successfully. Common duct exploration was successful in a further six out of seven cases. Of the remaining 42 patients, 18 were offered ERCP. Seven had no stone at endoscopy. Sixteen had imaging, revealing clear ducts in 14. The remaining two then had ERCP confirming choledocholithiasis. Eight patients were managed expectantly, of whom none required readmission with retained stones. CONCLUSION: Rates of retained asymptomatic stones after positive IOC were low. Acknowledging risks associated with intervention and low rates of readmission with retained CBDS, an expectant approach could be more readily considered.

The 90% effective dose (ED90) of remimazolam for inhibiting responses to the insertion of a duodenoscope during ERCP.

BACKGROUND: Compared to midazolam, remimazolam has a faster onset and offset of hypnotic effect, as well as cardiorespiratory stability, this study aims to determine the 90% effective dose (ED90) of remimazolam to inhibit responses to insertion of a duodenoscope during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: A dose-response study was carried out undergoing ERCP who received remimazolam-alfentanil anesthesia using 10 µg/kg of alfentanil between September 2021 and November 2021. The initial dose of remimazolam was 0.2 mg/kg. The dose was then decided based on the responses of earlier patients by exploiting the sequential ascend and descend according to a 9: 1 biased coin design. Upon failure, the dose of remimazolam was increased by 0.025 mg/kg in the next patient. When the insertion was successful, the succeeding patient was randomized to an identical dose or a dose that was lower by 0.025 mg/kg.The ED90 of remimazolam for inhibiting responses to the insertion of a duodenoscope during ERCP was calculated. Adverse events and complications of remimazolam were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 55 elderly patients (age > 65) were included in the study. 45 successfully anesthetized patients, and 10 unsuccessfully. The ED90 of remimazolam was 0.300 mg/kg (95% CI = 0.287-0.320). ED95 was 0.315 (95% CI = 0.312-0.323) and ED99 was 0.323 (95% CI = 0.323-0.325). Among the patients, 9 patients developed hypotension, 2 patients developed bradycardia and 1 patient developed tachycardia, and hypoxia occurred in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: A loading dose of 0.300 mg / kg of remimazolam for elderly patients undergoing ERCP can safely, effectively, and quickly induce patients to fall asleep and inhibit responses to the insertion of a duodenoscope. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered at the website ClinicalTrials.gov on 22/09/2021(NCT05053763).

[Retrograde cholangioscopy in differential diagnosis of parasitic invasion]. / Retrogradnaya kholangioskopiya v differentsial'noi parazitarnoi invazii. Klinicheskii sluchai.

The authors present differential diagnosis of parasitic invasion of the common bile duct. A 52-year-old patient admitted with malignant bile duct obstruction, mechanical jaundice, cholestatic hepatitis and cholangitis. Bile duct tumor was preliminary diagnosed according to anamnesis, complaints, physical, laboratory and instrumental data. Retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic papillotomy and revision of the common bile duct were performed. There was occlusion at the level of the upper third of the common bile duct. Retrograde cholangioscopy was performed to clarify the nature of obstruction and tumor. Cholangioscopy revealed parasites in the common bile duct that required extraction. The patient was sent to the infectious disease hospital.

Effectiveness of the pharmacological therapy to prevent post ERCP acute pancreatitis: a network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of the different pharmacological agents in preventing post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. METHODS: We included clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for prophylaxis of acute post-ERCP pancreatitis. The event evaluated was acute pancreatitis. We conducted a search strategy in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to nowadays. We reported the information in terms of relative risks (RR) with a 95% confidence interval. We assessed the heterogeneity using the I2 test. RESULTS: We included 84 studies for analysis (30,463 patients). The mean age was 59.3 years (SD ± 7.01). Heterogeneity between studies was low (I2 = 34.4%) with no inconsistencies (p = 0.2567). Post ERCP pancreatitis was less in prophylaxis with NSAIDs (RR 0.65 95% CI [0.52 to 0.80]), aggressive hydration with Lactate Ringer (RR 0.32 95% CI [0.12-0.86]), NSAIDs + isosorbide dinitrate (RR 0.28 95% CI [0.11-0.71]) and somatostatin and analogues (RR 0.54 [0.43 to 0.68]) compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs, the Combination of NSAIDs + isosorbide dinitrate, somatostatin and analogues, and aggressive hydration with lactate ringer are pharmacological strategies that can prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis when compared to placebo. More clinical trials are required to determine the effectiveness of these drugs.

A prospective, randomized, single-blinded study comparing the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

BACKGROUND: Balanced propofol sedation is extensively used in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but sedation-related adverse events (SRAEs) are common. In various clinical settings, the combination of dexmedetomidine with opioids and benzodiazepines has provided effective sedation with increased safety. The aim of this investigation was to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation during ERCP. METHODS: Forty-one patients were randomly divided into two groups: the dexmedetomidine (DEX) group and the propofol (PRO) group. Patients in the DEX group received an additional bolus of 0.6 µg kg-1 dexmedetomidine followed by a dexmedetomidine infusion at 1.2 µg kg-1 h-1, whereas the PRO group received 1-2 mg kg-1 of propofol bolus followed by a propofol infusion at 2-3 mg kg-1 h-1. During ERCP, the primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia (SpO2 < 90% for > 10 s). Other intraoperative adverse events were also recorded as secondary outcomes, including respiratory depression (respiratory rate of < 10 bpm min-1), hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg), and bradycardia (HR < 45 beats min-1). RESULTS: The incidence of hypoxemia was significantly reduced in the DEX group compared to the PRO group (0% versus 28.6%, respectively; P = 0.032). Patients in the PRO group exhibited respiratory depression more frequently than patients in the DEX group (35% versus 81%, respectively; P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in terms of hypotension and bradycardia episodes between groups. During the procedures, the satisfaction scores of endoscopists and patients, as well as the pain and procedure memory scores of patients were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: In comparison with propofol, dexmedetomidine provided adequate sedation safety with no adverse effects on sedation efficacy during ERCP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200061468, 25/06/2022.

Prediction for post-ERCP pancreatitis in non-elderly patients with common bile duct stones: a cross-sectional study at a major Chinese tertiary hospital (2015-2023).

BACKGROUND: Post-ERCP pancreatitis is one of the most common adverse events in ERCP-related procedures. The purpose of this study is to construct an online model to predict the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis in non-elderly patients with common bile duct stones through screening of relevant clinical parameters. METHODS: A total of 919 cases were selected from 7154 cases from a major Chinese tertiary hospital. Multivariable logistic regression model was fitted using the variables selected by the LASSO regression from 28 potential predictor variables. The internal and external validation was assessed by evaluating the receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under curve. Restricted cubic spline modelling was used to explore non-linear associations. The interactive Web application developed for risk prediction was built using the R "shiny" package. RESULTS: The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 5.22% (48/919) and significantly higher in non-elderly patients with female, high blood pressure, the history of pancreatitis, difficult intubation, endoscopic sphincterotomy, lower alkaline phosphatase and smaller diameter of common bile duct. The predictive performance in the test and external validation set was 0.915 (95% CI, 0.858-0.972) and 0.838 (95% CI, 0.689-0.986), respectively. The multivariate restricted cubic spline results showed that the incidence of pancreatitis was increased at 33-50 years old, neutrophil percentage > 58.90%, hemoglobin > 131 g/L, platelet < 203.04 or > 241.40 × 109/L, total bilirubin > 18.39 umol / L, aspartate amino transferase < 36.56 IU / L, alkaline phosphatase < 124.92 IU / L, Albumin < 42.21 g / L and common bile duct diameter between 7.25 and 10.02 mm. In addition, a web server was developed that supports query for immediate PEP risk. CONCLUSION: The visualized networked version of the above model is able to most accurately predict the risk of PEP in non-elderly patients with choledocholithiasis and allows clinicians to assess the risk of PEP in real time and provide preventive treatment measures as early as possible.

Advanced trainee perceptions of disposable duodenoscopes and disposable endcaps: results of a nationwide survey.

INTRODUCTION: Disposable duodenoscopes and duodenoscopes with disposable endcaps are being used in clinical practice to reduce or eliminate the risk of transmitting infections. The study aim was to assess perceptions and experiences regarding the use of these duodenoscopes among advanced endoscopy fellows in a nationally representative sample. METHODS: A 17-item electronic survey was sent to 74 advanced endoscopy training programs. The survey was completed by 50 participants and their responses were included for analysis. RESULTS: Most participants were from academic training programs (82.7%) and identified as being in their 7th year of post graduate training (92%; PGY-7). Participants performed an average of 414 ERCPs. 29% reported difficulty with cannulation using disposable duodenoscopes versus 15.7% with duodenoscopes with disposable endcaps (vs. standard duodenoscope). 96% of trainees perceived disposable duodenoscopes as not cost effective and 92% stated they would not use this device during independent practice. 100% of trainees stated that they would use duodenoscopes with disposable endcaps during independent practice. For their most challenging cases, 90% of trainees preferred using standard reprocessable duodenoscopes while no trainee indicated they would prefer using a disposable duodenoscope in this scenario. 82% of participants stated that disposable duodenoscopes and disposable endcaps should be used exclusively or preferentially for high-risk patients citing cost, functionality, and concerns regarding environmental impact. DISCUSSION: Advanced endoscopy fellows perceive disposable duodenoscopes as impacting technical maneuverability. Concerns about functionality, cost effectiveness and environmental impact are barriers to adoption.