A randomised controlled phase II trial to examine the feasibility of using hyper-oxygenated fatty acids (HOFA) to prevent facial pressure injuries from medical devices among adults admitted to intensive care-A research protocol.

One in three patients admitted to intensive care will sustain a pressure injury (PI) from a medical device. These injuries are painful and when on the face, head or neck they can result in permanent disfigurement. Preliminary evidence of the efficacy of hyper-oxygenated fatty acids (HOFAs) to prevent facial pressure injuries from medical devices is promising; however, the feasibility of incorporating HOFAs into current standard care to prevent PI from a medical device of the face, head and neck has not been extensively explored. It is intended that the findings from this phase II feasibility study will inform the design of a larger phase III trial, by addressing two primary aims: (1) to assess the feasibility of incorporating HOFAs into standard care to prevent device-related pressure ulcers of the skin associated with the face, head and neck assess the feasibility and (2) efficacy preliminary effectiveness of HOFA. This feasibility study is an investigator-initiated mixed method study incorporating a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of using HOFAs as an adjunct to standard pressure injury prevention and care, compared with standard care alone to prevent facial, head or neck from medical devices among adults admitted to intensive care. The primary outcome of interest is the incidence of facial, head or neck pressure injuries during the first 14 days in intensive care. Secondary outcomes include PI staging, medical device exposure and intensive care and hospital outcomes. The primary analysis will be undertaken using Cox's Proportional Hazards model, and due to the exploratory nature of this phase II trial, efficacy will be based on a one-sided p-value for superiority set at 0.10. Type I and Type II error rates are set at 20%; therefore, a total sample size of 196 study participants is planned. To explore the feasibility of incorporating HOFA into usual care and to design a larger phase III trial, we will aim to interview between 10 and 20 nurses across participating intensive care unit sites. Pressure injuries of the face, head or neck from medical devices, among adults admitted to intensive care, are considered preventable. This phase II study will investigate the feasibility and efficacy of HOFAs as an adjunct to standard care. Importantly, we aim to inform the development of a larger phase III trial.

Three-outcome designs for external pilot trials with progression criteria.

BACKGROUND: Whether or not to progress from a pilot study to a definitive trial is often guided by pre-specified quantitative progression criteria with three possible outcomes. Although the choice of these progression criteria will help to determine the statistical properties of the pilot trial, there is a lack of research examining how they, or the pilot sample size, should be determined. METHODS: We review three-outcome trial designs originally proposed in the phase II oncology setting and extend these to the case of external pilots, proposing a unified framework based on univariate hypothesis tests and the control of frequentist error rates. We apply this framework to an example and compare against a simple two-outcome alternative. RESULTS: We find that three-outcome designs can be used in the pilot setting, although they are not generally more efficient than simpler two-outcome alternatives. We show that three-outcome designs can help allow for other sources of information or other stakeholders to feed into progression decisions in the event of a borderline result, but this will come at the cost of a larger pilot sample size than the two-outcome case. We also show that three-outcome designs can be used to allow adjustments to be made to the intervention or trial design before commencing the definitive trial, providing the effect of the adjustment can be accurately predicted at the pilot design stage. An R package, tout, is provided to optimise progression criteria and pilot sample size. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed three-outcome framework provides a way to optimise pilot trial progression criteria and sample size in a way that leads to desired operating characteristics. It can be applied whether or not an adjustment following the pilot trial is anticipated, but will generally lead to larger sample size requirements than simpler two-outcome alternatives.

Explainable machine learning prediction of edema adverse events in patients treated with tepotinib.

Tepotinib is approved for the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. While edema is the most prevalent adverse event (AE) and a known class effect of MET inhibitors including tepotinib, there is still limited understanding about the factors contributing to its occurrence. Herein, we apply machine learning (ML)-based approaches to predict the likelihood of occurrence of edema in patients undergoing tepotinib treatment, and to identify factors influencing its development over time. Data from 612 patients receiving tepotinib in five Phase I/II studies were modeled with two ML algorithms, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Trees, to predict edema AE incidence and severity. Probability calibration was applied to give a realistic estimation of the likelihood of edema AE. Best model was tested on follow-up data and on data from clinical studies unused while training. Results showed high performances across all the tested settings, with F1 scores up to 0.961 when retraining the model with the most relevant covariates. The use of ML explainability methods identified serum albumin as the most informative longitudinal covariate, and higher age as associated with higher probabilities of more severe edema. The developed methodological framework enables the use of ML algorithms for analyzing clinical safety data and exploiting longitudinal information through various covariate engineering approaches. Probability calibration ensures the accurate estimation of the likelihood of the AE occurrence, while explainability tools can identify factors contributing to model predictions, hence supporting population and individual patient-level interpretation.

If You Build It, Patients with Rare Cancers Will Come: A Successful Clinical Trial in Relapsed and Refractory JMML.

Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is a rare pediatric hematologic malignancy with a high relapse rate and a poor prognosis hallmarked by RAS pathway mutations. Stieglitz and colleagues conducted a phase II clinical trial using the MEK inhibitor trametinib to treat patients with relapsed and refractory juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and observed an objective response rate of 50% and an overall survival of 80% after 4 years. See related article by Stieglitz et al., p. 1590 (4) .

A randomized phase II trial on the addition of dutasteride to combined androgen blockade therapy versus combined androgen blockade therapy alone in patients with advanced or metastatic salivary duct carcinoma - the DUCT study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of salivary gland cancer, frequently associated with incurable recurrences and distant metastases (R/M). Proliferation of SDC relies on androgen receptor (AR) signalling, prompting the use of combined androgen blockade (CAB, i.e., luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist and/or AR antagonists) to R/M SDC patients. However, only a subset of patients benefits from such treatments. We have shown that response to CAB is associated with steroid 5α-reductase 1 (SRD5A1) mRNA expression. SRD5A1 catalyses the intracellular conversion of testosterone into the more potent AR-agonist dihydrotestosterone. This conversion can be inhibited by dutasteride, a potent SRD5A1-inhibitor, which is currently prescribed for benign prostatic hyperplasia. We hypothesize that repurposing dutasteride to target AR signalling in SDC could enhance therapeutic response and clinical outcome in SDC patients. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, randomized controlled phase II clinical trial, is designed to investigate whether dutasteride as an adjunct drug to CAB improves response rate and clinical outcome in patients with AR-positive R/M SDC. Patients are divided in two cohorts based on their prior systemic treatments. In cohort A, CAB-naïve patients (n = 74) will be randomly assigned to either a control arm (Arm 1) receiving CAB (goserelin 10.8 mg/3m and bicalutamide 50 mg/OD) or an experimental arm (Arm 2) where dutasteride (0.5 mg/OD) is added to the CAB regimen. In cohort B, patients with disease progression after adjuvant or first-line palliative CAB therapy (max. n = 24) will receive goserelin, bicalutamide, and dutasteride to assess whether the addition of dutasteride can overcome therapy resistance. The primary endpoints are the objective response rate and duration of response. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit rate, quality of life, and safety. Translational research will be performed to explore molecular target expression differences and their correlation with clinical outcome. DISCUSSION: The DUCT study addresses an unmet medical need by investigating the repurposing of dutasteride to enhance treatment response and improve clinical outcome for patients with R/M SDC, especially those with limited alternative treatment options, such as HER2-negative cases. By repurposing a registered low-cost drug, this trial's findings could be readily applied into clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05513365. Date of registration: August 24, 2022. PROTOCOL VERSION: Current protocol version 4.0, February 21, 2024.

Feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy on the future pancreatic neck transection margin to reduce the risk of pancreatic fistula after high-risk pancreatoduodenectomy (FIBROPANC): protocol for a multicentre, single-arm trial.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurs in 25% of patients undergoing a high-risk pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and is a driving cause of major morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospital stay and increased costs after PD. There is a need for perioperative methods to decrease these risks. In recent studies, preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) reduced the rate of POPF seemingly due to radiation-induced pancreatic fibrosis. However, patients with a high risk of POPF mostly have a non-pancreatic periampullary tumour and do not receive radiotherapy. Prospective studies using radiotherapy specifically to reduce the risk of POPF have not been performed. We aim to assess the safety, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy on the future pancreatic neck transection margin to reduce the rate of POPF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial, we aim to assess the feasibility and safety of a single fraction of preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy (12 Gy) to a 4 cm area around the future pancreatic neck transection margin in patients at high risk of developing POPF after PD aimed to reduce the risk of grade B/C POPF. Adult patients scheduled for PD for malignant and premalignant periampullary tumours, excluding PDAC, with a pancreatic duct diameter ≤3 mm will be included in centres participating in the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. The primary outcome is the safety and feasibility of single-dose preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy before PD. The most relevant secondary outcomes are grade B/C POPF and the difference in the extent of fibrosis between the radiated and non-radiated (uncinate margin) pancreas. Evaluation of endpoints will be performed after inclusion of 33 eligible patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained by the Amsterdam UMC's accredited Medical Research Ethics Committee (METC). All included patients are required to have provided written informed consent. The results of this trial will be used to determine the need for a randomised controlled phase III trial and submitted to a high-impact peer-reviewed medical journal regardless of the study outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL72913 (Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects Registry) and NCT05641233 (ClinicalTrials).

Applications of the prediction of satisfaction design for monitoring single-arm phase II trials.

Prediction of satisfaction design, with binary endpoints, is an innovative strategy for phase II trials. We explain this hybrid frequentist-Bayesian strategy with an adept statistical plan and thorough findings, incorporating a description of study design features such as the sample size and the beta prior distribution, to simplify the Bayesian design. We also provide a set of tables and figures ranging from the stopping boundary for futility to the prediction of satisfaction, performance (type I error, power, and the probability of early termination PET), and sensitivity analysis for prediction of satisfaction. The statistical plan includes the operating characteristics through simulation study. Several trial examples from phase II lung cancer studies demonstrate the approach's practical use. The prediction of satisfaction design presents a flexible method in clinical study. This statistical study adds value to the application by broadening its scope.

A randomized phase III trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for patients with up to 10 oligometastases and a synchronous primary tumor (SABR-SYNC): study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Emerging randomized data, mostly from phase II trials, have suggested that patients with oligometastatic cancers may benefit from ablative treatments such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). However, phase III data testing this paradigm are lacking, and many studies have examined SABR in the setting of metachronous oligometastatic disease. The goal of the SABR-SYNC trial is to assess the effect of SABR in patients with oligometastatic cancers and a synchronous primary tumor. METHODS: One hundred and eighty patients will be randomized in a 1:2 ratio between standard of care (SOC) palliative-intent treatments vs. SOC + ablative therapy (SABR preferred) to all sites of known disease. Randomization will be stratified based on histology and number of metastases at enrollment. SABR may be delivered in 1-, 3- and 5-fraction regimens, with recommended doses of 20 Gy, 30 Gy, and 35 Gy, respectively. Non-SABR local modalities (e.g. surgery, thermal ablation, conventional radiation) may be used for treatment of the primary or metastases at the discretion of the treating physicians, if those modalities are clinically preferred. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, time to development of new metastatic lesions, time to initiation of next systemic therapy, quality of life, and toxicity. Translational endpoints include assessment of circulating tumor DNA and immunological predictors of outcomes. DISCUSSION: SABR-SYNC will provide phase III data to assess the impact of SABR on overall survival in a population of patients with synchronous oligometastases. The translational component will attempt to identify novel prognostic and predictive biomarkers to aid in clinical decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05717166 (registration date: Feb. 8, 2023).

A phase II trial examining the safety and preliminary efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for people living with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological condition and the leading cause of non-traumatic disability in young adults. MS pathogenesis leads to the death of oligodendrocytes, demyelination, and progressive central nervous system neurodegeneration. Endogenous remyelination occurs in people with MS (PwMS) but is insufficient to repair the damage. Our preclinical studies in mice indicate that endogenous remyelination can be supported by the delivery of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Our phase I trial concluded that 20 sessions of rTMS, delivered over 5 weeks, are safe and feasible for PwMS. This phase II trial aims to investigate the safety and preliminary efficacy of rTMS for PwMS. METHODS: Participants must be aged 18-65 years, diagnosed with MS by a neurologist, stable and relapse free for 6 months, have an Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS) between 1.5 and 6 (inclusive), willing to travel to a study site every weekday for 4 consecutive weeks, and able to provide informed consent and access the internet. Participants from multiple centres will be randomised 2:1 (rTMS to sham) stratified by sex. The intervention will be delivered with a Magstim Rapid2 stimulator device and circular 90-mm coil or MagVenture MagPro stimulator device with C100 circular coil, positioned to stimulate a broad area including frontal and parietal cortices. For the rTMS group, pulse intensity will be set at 18% (MagVenture) or 25% (Magstim) of maximum stimulator output (MSO), and rTMS applied as intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) (~ 3 min per side; 600 pulses). For the sham group, the procedure will be the same, but the intensity is set at 0%. Each participant will attend 20 intervention sessions over a maximum of 5 weeks. Outcome measures include MS Functional Composite Score (primary), Fatigue Severity Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Quality of Life, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index/Numeric Rating Scale and adverse events (secondary) and advanced MRI metrics (tertiary). Outcomes will be measured at baseline and after completing the intervention. DISCUSSION: This study will determine if rTMS can improve functional outcomes or other MS symptoms and determine whether rTMS has the potential to promote remyelination in PwMS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, 20 January 2022; ACTRN12622000064707.

Study protocol for Near-infrared molecular imaging for lung cancer detection and treatment during mini-invasive surgery (phase II Trial) - (the RECOGNISE study).

INTRODUCTION: To date, radical surgery remains the best curative option in patients with early-stage lung cancer. In patients with small lung lesions, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) should be increasingly chosen as a fundamental alternative to thoracotomy as it is associated with less postoperative pain and better quality of life. This scenario necessarily increases the need for thoracic surgeons to implement new localization techniques. The conventional near-infrared (NIR) indocyanine green (ICG) method demonstrated a significant limitation in deep cancer recognition, principally due to its intrinsic low-depth tissue penetration. Similarly, the lymph-node sentinel approach conducted by the ICG method was demonstrated to be inefficient, mainly due to the non-specificity of the tracker and the irregular pathway of pulmonary lymph node drainage. Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Cetuximab- IRDye800CW in marking lung nodules and mediastinal lymph nodes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is defined as an open-label, single-arm, single-stage phase II trial evaluating the effectiveness of Cetuximab-IRDye800CW in detecting tumors and lymph-node metastases in patients with lung cancer who are undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds, inhibits, and degrade the EGFR. The IRDye® 800CW, an indocyanine-type NIR fluorophore, demonstrated enhanced tissue penetration compared to other NIR dyes. The combination with the clinical approved monoclonal antibody anti-epidermal growth factor EGFR Cetuximab (Cetuximab-IRDye800) has shown promising results as a specific tracker in different cancer types (i.e., brain, pancreas, head, and neck). The study's primary outcome is focused on the proportion of patients with lung nodules detected during surgery using an NIR camera. The secondary outcomes include a broad spectrum of items, including the proportion of patients with detection of unexpected cancer localization during surgery by NIR camera and the proportion of patients with negative surgical margins, the evaluation of the time spawns between the insertion of the NIR camera and the visualization of the nodule and the possible morbidity of the drug assessed during and after the drug infusion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (Torino, Italy) and by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA). Findings will be written as methodology papers for conference presentations and published in peer-reviewed journals. The Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, the University of Torino, and the AIRC Public Engagement Divisions will help identify how best to publicize the findings.Trial registration EudraCT 202,100,645,430. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT06101394 (October 23, 2023).

Omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with clinically axillary lymph node-negative early breast cancer (OMSLNB): protocol for a prospective, non-inferiority, single-arm, phase II clinical trial in China.

INTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard procedure for patients with clinically assessed negative axillary lymph nodes (cN0) during early-stage breast cancer (EBC). However, the majority of EBC patients have a negative pathological confirmation of the sentinel lymph node (SLN), and axillary surgery is inevitably associated with postoperative complications. Considering that SLNB has no therapeutic benefit, this trial aims to determine the safety of omitting SLNB in patients with cN0 early invasive breast cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The OMSLNB trial is a prospective, single-arm, non-inferiority, phase II, open-label study design involving female breast cancer patients with a tumor of ≤3 cm in diameter, who are considered axillary lymph-node-negative based on two or more radiological examinations, including axillary lymph node ultrasonography. Eligible patients will avoid axillary surgery but will undergo breast surgery, which is not limited to breast-conserving surgery. The trial begins in 2023 and is scheduled to end in 2027. The primary endpoint is 3 year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). The secondary endpoints include the incidence of breast cancer-related lymphoedema, patient-reported outcomes, locoregional recurrence, local recurrence and regional recurrence. It is expected that the 3 year iDFS in patients undergoing SLNB is about 90%, combined with a non-inferiority cut-off of 5%, 80% power, 95% CIs, 0.05 test level, and 10% loss to follow-up rate, the planned enrollment is 311 patients. All enrolled patients will be included in the intention-to-treat analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (No.2023-SR-193). All participants must provide written informed consent to be eligible. The protocol will be described in a peer-reviewed manuscript, and the results will be published in scientific journals and/or at academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05935150.

Design of TOLERANT: phase I/II safety assessment of intranodal administration of HSP70/mB29a self-peptide antigen-loaded autologous tolerogenic dendritic cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), immunosuppressive therapies may achieve symptomatic relief, but do not induce long-term, drug-free remission. Meanwhile, the lifelong use of immunosuppressive drugs confers increased risk for malignancy and infections. As such, there is an unmet need for novel treatments that selectively target the pathogenic immune response in RA by inducing tolerance to autoantigens. Autologous cell therapy using antigen-loaded tolerogenic dendritic cells (tolDCs) aims to reinstate autoantigen-specific immunological tolerance in RA and could potentially meet this need. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We report here the design of the phase I/II, investigator-initiated, open-label, dose-escalation trial TOLERANT. In this study, we will evaluate the intranodal administration of tolDCs in patients with RA that are in remission under immunosuppressive therapy. The tolDCs in this trial are loaded with the heat shock protein 70-derived peptide mB29a, which is an effective surrogate autoantigen in animal models of arthritis. Within this study, three dose-escalation cohorts (two intranodal injections of 5×106, 10×106 and 15×106 tolDCs), each consisting of three patients, are evaluated to identify the highest safe dose (recommended dose), and an extension cohort of nine patients will be treated with the recommended dose. The (co-)primary endpoints of this study are safety and feasibility, which we assess by the number of AEs and the successful production of tolDCs. The secondary endpoints include the immunological effects of the treatment, which we assess with a variety of high-dimensional and antigen-specific immunological assays. Clinical effects are exploratory outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study has been obtained from the Netherlands Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects. The outcomes of the trial will be disseminated through publications in open-access, peer-reviewed scientific journals, scientific conferences and to patient associations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT05251870; 2019-003620-20 (EudraCT); NL71296.000.20 (CCMO register).

Anti-infectivity efficacy and pharmacokinetics of WHO recommended single low-dose primaquine in children with acute Plasmodium falciparum in Burkina Faso: study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Primaquine (PQ) has activity against mature P. falciparum gametocytes and proven transmission blocking efficacy (TBE) between humans and mosquitoes. WHO formerly recommended a single transmission blocking dose of 0.75 mg/kg but this was little used. Then in 2012, faced with the emergence of artemisinin-resistant P. falciparum (ARPf) in SE Asia, the WHO recommended a lower dose of 0.25 mg/kg to be added to artemisinin-based combination therapy in falciparum-infected patients in low transmission areas. This dose was considered safe in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDd) and not requiring G6PD testing. Subsequent single low-dose primaquine (SLDPQ) studies have demonstrated safety in different G6PD variants. Dosing remains challenging in children under the age of 5 because of the paucity of PQ pharmacokinetic (PK) data. We plan to assess the anti-infectivity efficacy of SLDPQ using an allometrically scaled, weight-based regimen, with a target dose of 0.25 mg/kg, in children with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria. METHODS: This study is an open label, randomised 1:1, phase IIb study to assess TBE, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and acceptability of artesunate pyronaridine (ASPYR) administered alone or combined with SLDPQ in 56 Burkinabe children aged ≥ 6 months- < 5 years, with uncomplicated P. falciparum and a haemoglobin (Hb) concentration of ≥ 5 g/dL. We will assess TBE, using direct membrane feeding assays (DMFA), and further investigate PQ pharmacokinetics, adverse events, Hb dynamics, G6PD, sickle cells, thalassaemia and cytochrome 2D6 (CYP2D6) status, acceptability of flavoured PQ [CAST-ClinSearch Acceptability Score Test®], and the population's knowledge, attitude and practices on malaria. EXPECTED RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We expect children to accept tablets, confirm the TBE and gametocytocidal effects of SLDPQ and then construct a PK infectivity model (including age, sex, baseline Hb, G6PD and CYP2D6 status) to define the dose response TBE relationship that may lead to fine tuning our SLDPQ regimen. Our study will complement others that have examined factors associated with Hb dynamics and PQ PK. It will provide much needed, high-quality evidence of SLDPQ in sick African children and provide reassurance that SLDPQ should be used as a strategy against emerging ARPf in Africa. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN16297951. Registered on September 26, 2021.

Low dose TamOxifen and LifestylE changes for bReast cANcer prevention (TOLERANT study): Study protocol of a randomized phase II biomarker trial in women at increased risk for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast Cancer (BC) prevention strategies range from lifestyle changes such as increasing physical activity and reducing body weight to preventive drugs like tamoxifen, known to reduce BC incidence in high-risk women. Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) is related to BC risk due to its ability to bind circulating estradiol at high affinity and to regulate estradiol action. A study protocol is presented based on the assessment of the effect of different interventions such as tamoxifen at 10 mg every other day (LDT), intermittent caloric restriction (ICR) two days per week, lifestyle intervention (LI, step counter use) and their combination on the modulation of SHBG and several other biomarkers associated to BC. METHODS: A randomized phase II biomarker study will be conducted in 4 Italian centers. Unaffected women aged between 18 and 70 years, carriers of a germline pathogenetic variant (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, or other moderate penetrance genes), or with a >5% BC risk at 10 years (according to the Tyrer-Cuzick or the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Risk models) or with a previous diagnosis of intraepithelial neoplasia will be eligible. A total of 200 participants will be randomized to one of the four arms: LDT; LDT + ICR; LI; LI + ICR. Interventions will span six months, with baseline and follow-up clinic visits and interim phone calls. DISCUSSION: The aim of the study is to verify whether LDT increases circulating SHBG more than LI with or without ICR after 6 months. Secondary objectives include assessing HOMA-index, inflammatory markers, adiponectin/leptin ratio, quality of life (QoL), safety, toxicity, mammographic density, and changes in microbiome composition across groups. The study's innovation lies in its inclusion of diverse BC risk categories and combination of pharmaceutical and behavioral interventions, potentially enhancing intervention efficacy while balancing tamoxifen's side effects on QoL, especially menopausal symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EuCT number:2023-503994-39-00; Clinical trials.gov NCT06033092.

Home-based EXercise and motivAtional programme before and after Liver Transplantation (EXALT): study protocol for phase II two-centre, randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Physical frailty is associated with increased mortality and poor quality of life (QoL) before and after liver transplantation (LT). Evidence is lacking on how to tailor exercise and behavioural techniques in this patient population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Home-based EXercise and motivAtional programme before and after Liver Transplantation (EXALT) is a phase 2b, open-label, two-centre randomised controlled clinical trial designed to investigate whether a remotely monitored 'home-based exercise and theory-based motivation support programme (HBEP)' before and after LT improves QoL in LT recipients. Adult patients awaiting a primary LT will be assessed for eligibility at two LT centres (Birmingham, Royal Free London). Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either an HBEP while on the LT waiting list through to 24 weeks after LT (Intervention) or a patient exercise advice leaflet (Control). Using a standard method of difference in means (two-sided significance level 0.05; power 0.90) and accounting for a 35% attrition/withdrawal rate, a minimum of 133 patients will be randomised to each treatment group. The primary outcome measure will be assessed using intention-to-treat analysis of the difference in the Physical Component Score of Short form-36 version 2.0 health-related QoL questionnaire between the groups at 24 weeks post-LT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the South Central-Hampshire A National Research Ethics Committee. Recruitment into the EXALT trial started in May 2022 and is due to end in June 2024, with 217/266 patients randomised to date. The intervention follow-up is due to finish in May 2026. The findings of this trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13476586.