Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 13.928
Filter
1.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965850

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of cochlear implantation in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant (CI) users with single-sided deafness (SSD). Methods: This study was a single-center prospective cohort study. Eleven Mandarin-speaking adult SSD patients who underwent CI implantation at Capital Medical University Beijing Tongren Hospital from August 2020 to October 2021 were recruited, including 6 males and 5 females, with the age ranging from 24 to 50 years old. In a sound field with 7 loudspeakers distributed at 180°, we measured root-mean-square error(RMSE)in SSD patients at the preoperative, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month after switch-on to assess the improvement of sound source localization. The Mandarin Speech Perception (MSP) was used in the sound field to test the speech reception threshold (SRT) of SSD patients under different signal-to-noise locations in a steady-state noise under conditions of CI off and CI on, to reflect the head shadow effect(SSSDNNH), binaural summation effect(S0N0) and squelch effect(S0NSSD). The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to assess changes in tinnitus severity and tinnitus loudness in SSD patients at each time point. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale(SSQ) and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Scale (NCIQ) were used to assess the subjective benefits of spatial speech perception and quality of life in SSD patients after cochlear implantation. SPSS 19.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: SSD patients showed a significant improvement in the poorer ear in hearing thresholds with CI-on compared with CI-off; The ability to localize the sound source was significantly improved, with statistically significant differences in RMSE at each follow-up time compared with the preoperative period (P<0.05). In the SSSDNNH condition, which reflects the head shadow effect, the SRT in binaural hearing was significantly improved by 6.5 dB compared with unaided condition, and the difference was statistically significant (t=6.25, P=0.001). However, there was no significant improvement in SRT between the binaural hearing condition and unaided conditions in the S0N0 and S0NSSD conditions (P>0.05). The total score of THI and three dimensions were significant decreased (P<0.05). Tinnitus VAS scores were significantly lower in binaural hearing compared to the unaided condition (P<0.001). The total score of SSQ, and the scores of speech and spatial dimensions were significant improved in binaural hearing compared to the unaided condition (P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in NCIQ questionnaire scores between preoperative and postoperative (P>0.05), and only the self-efficacy subscore showed a significant increase(Z=-2.497,P=0.013). Conclusion: CI could help Mandarin-speaking SSD patients restore binaural hearing to some extent, improve sound localization and speech recognition in noise. In addition, CI in SSD patients could suppress tinnitus, reduce the loudness of tinnitus, and improve subjective perceptions of spatial hearing and quality of life.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Humans , Male , Female , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Adult , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/surgery , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Young Adult , Sound Localization , Tinnitus/surgery , Deafness/surgery , Hearing Aids
2.
J Vis Exp ; (208)2024 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38975780

ABSTRACT

Measuring the electrically evoked stapedius reflex during the fitting of cochlear implants (CIs) provides a reliable estimation of maximum comfort levels, resulting in the programming of the CI with high hearing comfort and good speech understanding. Detection of the stapedius reflex and the required stimulation level on each implant channel is already being performed during surgery, whereby intraoperative stapedius reflexes are observed through the surgical microscope. Intraoperative stapedius reflex detection is both an indicator that the auditory nerve is responding to electrical stimulation up to the brainstem and a test for the ability to perform postoperative stapedius reflex measurements. Postoperative stapedius reflex thresholds can be used to estimate upper stimulation levels in the CI fitting process. In particular, in children or patients unable to provide feedback on loudness perception, this method avoids inadequate stimulation with the CI, which can result in poor hearing performance. In addition, overstimulation can be avoided, which could even lead to refusal to use the device.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Electric Stimulation , Stapedius , Humans , Stapedius/physiology , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Electric Stimulation/methods , Cochlear Implants , Reflex, Acoustic/physiology
3.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973031

ABSTRACT

Objective:To evaluate the effects of cochlear implantation in patients with single-sided deafness(SSD) and asymmetrical hearing loss(AHL). Methods:Seventeen Mandarin-speaking CI patients diagnosed as SSD/AHL were recruited in our study. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory(THI) and the Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) were used to assess changes in tinnitus distress and tinnitus loudness in SSD patients at each time point(pre-operation and post-operation). Results:The THI score and all 3 dimensions were significant decreased with CI-on than pre-operation(P<0.05). Tinnitus VAS scores were also decreased, and VAS scores were lower with CI-on than with CI-off, and were both significantly different at each time point after CI switch-on(P<0.05). Conclusion:CI could help SSD/AHL patients to suppress tinnitus and reduce the loudness of tinnitus. However, CI should not be a treatment of tinnitus.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Tinnitus , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Cochlear Implants , Aged , Hearing Loss
4.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973049

ABSTRACT

Large vestibular aqueduct syndrome(LVAS) is a common recessive hereditary hearing loss disease, and some patients may also experience vestibular dysfunction. With the wide application of cochlear implant(CI) and the development of vestibular medicine, the pathophysiological mechanism of LVAS and the influence mechanism of CI on vestibular function are gradually elucidated. Consequently, the evaluation and rehabilitation of vestibular dysfunction function have also become research hotspots. This article reviews studies on vestibular function and related rehabilitation in patients with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome.


Subject(s)
Vestibular Aqueduct , Humans , Vestibular Aqueduct/abnormalities , Cochlear Implants , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Vestibular Diseases/physiopathology , Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Vestibule, Labyrinth/physiopathology
5.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973051

ABSTRACT

With the development of social economic and technology, Cochlear Implantation has became an effective therapy for patients who suffered from severe or profound hearing impairment. In the meantime, patients' demands for sound and auditory quality are also increasing. In terms of speech recognition, localization, and auditory quality, bilateral hearing is closer to the auditory experience of normal individuals, so bilateral cochlear implantation(BCI) emerged as the times require. In this article, we will introduce the status and progress of bimodal regarding to the following aspects: the brief history, the advantages of BCI, different methods for BCI, and the problems encountered in BCI.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Speech Perception , Hearing Loss/surgery
7.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(7): 3839-3843, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825603

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to capture the difference between the groups in direct relation to the type of electrode array insertion during cochlear implantation (CI). The robotic insertion is expected to be a more gently option. As recent studies have shown, there is a difference in perception of visual vertical (SVV) and postural control related to the CI. We assume that there can be differences in postural control and space perception outcomes depending on the type of the surgical method. METHODS: In total, 37 (24 females, mean age ± SD was 42.9 ± 13.0) candidates for CI underwent an assessment. In 14 cases, the insertion of the electrode array was performed by a robotic system (RobOtol, Colin, France) and 23 were performed conventionally. In all of these patients, we performed the same examination before the surgery, the first day, and 3 weeks after the surgery. The protocol consists of static posturography and perception of visual vertical. RESULTS: The both groups, RobOtol and conventional, responded to the procedure similarly despite the dissimilar electrode insertion. There was no difference between two groups in the dynamic of perception SVV and postural parameters. Patients in both groups were statistically significantly affected by the surgical procedure, SVV deviation appeared in the opposite direction from the implanted ear: 0.90° ± 1.25; - 1.67° ± 3.05 and - 0.19° ± 1.78 PRE and POST surgery (p < 0.001). And this deviation was spontaneously adjusted in FOLLOW-UP after 3 weeks (p < 0.01) in the both groups. We did not find a significant difference in postural parameters between the RobOtol and conventional group, even over time. CONCLUSION: Although the robotic system RobOtol allows a substantial reduction in the speed of insertion of the electrode array into the inner ear, our data did not demonstrate a postoperative effect on vestibular functions (SVV and posturography), which have the same character and dynamics as in the group with standard manual insertion. REGISTRATION NUMBER: The project is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT05547113).


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Postural Balance , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Space Perception , Humans , Female , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Male , Adult , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Middle Aged , Space Perception/physiology , Postural Balance/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Cochlear Implants
8.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 13241, 2024 06 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38853168

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implants (CIs) do not offer the same level of effectiveness in noisy environments as in quiet settings. Current single-microphone noise reduction algorithms in hearing aids and CIs only remove predictable, stationary noise, and are ineffective against realistic, non-stationary noise such as multi-talker interference. Recent developments in deep neural network (DNN) algorithms have achieved noteworthy performance in speech enhancement and separation, especially in removing speech noise. However, more work is needed to investigate the potential of DNN algorithms in removing speech noise when tested with listeners fitted with CIs. Here, we implemented two DNN algorithms that are well suited for applications in speech audio processing: (1) recurrent neural network (RNN) and (2) SepFormer. The algorithms were trained with a customized dataset ( ∼ 30 h), and then tested with thirteen CI listeners. Both RNN and SepFormer algorithms significantly improved CI listener's speech intelligibility in noise without compromising the perceived quality of speech overall. These algorithms not only increased the intelligibility in stationary non-speech noise, but also introduced a substantial improvement in non-stationary noise, where conventional signal processing strategies fall short with little benefits. These results show the promise of using DNN algorithms as a solution for listening challenges in multi-talker noise interference.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Cochlear Implants , Deep Learning , Noise , Speech Intelligibility , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Speech Perception/physiology , Aged , Adult , Neural Networks, Computer
10.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 155(6): 3833-3847, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38884525

ABSTRACT

For cochlear implant (CI) listeners, holding a conversation in noisy and reverberant environments is often challenging. Deep-learning algorithms can potentially mitigate these difficulties by enhancing speech in everyday listening environments. This study compared several deep-learning algorithms with access to one, two unilateral, or six bilateral microphones that were trained to recover speech signals by jointly removing noise and reverberation. The noisy-reverberant speech and an ideal noise reduction algorithm served as lower and upper references, respectively. Objective signal metrics were compared with results from two listening tests, including 15 typical hearing listeners with CI simulations and 12 CI listeners. Large and statistically significant improvements in speech reception thresholds of 7.4 and 10.3 dB were found for the multi-microphone algorithms. For the single-microphone algorithm, there was an improvement of 2.3 dB but only for the CI listener group. The objective signal metrics correctly predicted the rank order of results for CI listeners, and there was an overall agreement for most effects and variances between results for CI simulations and CI listeners. These algorithms hold promise to improve speech intelligibility for CI listeners in environments with noise and reverberation and benefit from a boost in performance when using features extracted from multiple microphones.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Deep Learning , Noise , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Perception , Humans , Noise/adverse effects , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Algorithms , Young Adult , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation
11.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0302790, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885210

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implantation is an effective intervention to restore useful aspects of hearing function in adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Tinnitus, the perception of sound in the absence of an external source, is common in people with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Existing evidence suggests cochlear implantation may be effective in reducing the negative impact of tinnitus in this population. However, this is contradicted by data suggesting that up to half of cochlear implant recipients experience tinnitus, and that some of these patients who did not have tinnitus before cochlear implantation experience it after surgery or cochlear implant activation. Most evidence on the effects of cochlear implantation on tinnitus comes from secondary data in cochlear implant studies primarily concerned with hearing-related outcomes. Hence, the quality of the evidence for effects on tinnitus is low and not suitable to inform clinical recommendations or decision-making. This study will systematically collect data on tinnitus and tinnitus-related outcomes from patients at multiple points during the cochlear implant pathway to characterise changes in tinnitus. This will improve our understanding of the effects of cochlear implantation for tinnitus in adults with severe to profound hearing loss and inform the design of clinical trials of cochlear implantation for tinnitus.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Tinnitus , Tinnitus/surgery , Tinnitus/etiology , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Prospective Studies , Cochlear Implants , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Hearing Loss/surgery , Male , Female
12.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(11)2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38894099

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implants are crucial for addressing severe-to-profound hearing loss, with the success of the procedure requiring careful electrode placement. This scoping review synthesizes the findings from 125 studies examining the factors influencing insertion forces (IFs) and intracochlear pressure (IP), which are crucial for optimizing implantation techniques and enhancing patient outcomes. The review highlights the impact of variables, including insertion depth, speed, and the use of robotic assistance on IFs and IP. Results indicate that higher insertion speeds generally increase IFs and IP in artificial models, a pattern not consistently observed in cadaveric studies due to variations in methodology and sample size. The study also explores the observed minimal impact of robotic assistance on reducing IFs compared to manual methods. Importantly, this review underscores the need for a standardized approach in cochlear implant research to address inconsistencies and improve clinical practices aimed at preserving hearing during implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Pressure , Cochlea/surgery , Cochlea/physiology , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotics/methods , Hearing Loss/surgery , Hearing Loss/physiopathology
13.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241261480, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38887094

ABSTRACT

This multi-center study examined the safety and effectiveness of cochlear implantation of children between 9 and 11 months of age. The intended impact was to support practice regarding candidacy assessment and prognostic counseling of pediatric cochlear implant candidates. Data in the clinical chart of children implanted at 9-11 months of age with Cochlear Ltd devices at five cochlear implant centers in the United States and Canada were included in analyses. The study included data from two cohorts implanted with one or two Nucleus devices during the periods of January 1, 2012-December 31, 2017 (Cohort 1, n = 83) or between January 1, 2018 and May 15, 2020 (Cohort 2, n = 50). Major adverse events (requiring another procedure/hospitalization) and minor adverse events (managed with medication alone or underwent an expected course of treatment that did not require surgery or hospitalization) out to 2 years post-implant were monitored and outcomes measured by audiometric thresholds and parent-reports on the IT-MAIS and LittlEARS questionnaires were collected. Results revealed 60 adverse events in 41 children and 227 ears implanted (26%) of which 14 major events occurred in 11 children; all were transitory and resolved. Improved hearing with cochlear implant use was shown in all outcome measures. Findings reveal that the procedure is safe for infants and that they show clear benefits of cochlear implantation including increased audibility and hearing development.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Infant , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Male , Female , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Canada , United States , Time Factors , Retrospective Studies , Auditory Threshold , Postoperative Complications
14.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 53: 19160216241250351, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888946

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The long-term preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation has become a major goal over the past few years. The aim of the present study was to evaluate residual hearing in the long-term follow-up using mid-scala electrodes. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, we collected data from 27 patients who were implanted between 2014 and 2015 with residual hearing in the low-frequency range using a mid-scala electrode. Measurements of the hearing thresholds were carried out directly postoperatively (day 1 after surgery) and in the long-term follow-up 43.7 ± 6.9 months. The calculation of the extent of audiological hearing preservation was determined using the HEARRING group formula by Skarsynski. RESULTS: Postoperative preservation of residual hearing was achieved in 69.2% of the cases in the low-frequency range between 250 Hz and 1 kHz, of which 89.5% of the patients had frequencies that suggested using electroacoustic stimulation (EAS). In the long-term follow-up, 30.8% of the patients showed residual hearing; however, 57.1% had apparently benefited from EAS. CONCLUSION: Preservation of residual hearing is feasible in the long term using mid-scala electrodes. Postoperatively, there is over the half of patients who benefit from an EAS strategy. The long-term follow-up shows a certain decrease in residual hearing. However, these results are comparable to studies relating to other types of electrodes. Further research should be conducted in future to better evaluate hearing loss in long-term follow-up, compared to direct postoperative audiological results.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Middle Aged , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Hearing/physiology , Aged , Auditory Threshold , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Treatment Outcome , Child , Electrodes, Implanted , Young Adult , Prosthesis Design , Hearing Loss/surgery , Time Factors
15.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 144(3): 181-186, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38824490

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Follow-up of cochlear implant effectiveness is mainly focused on 3 years postoperatively, and studies with more than 5 years of observation are rare, especially for local Chinese brands. OBJECTIVES: Nurotron (Chinese domestic cochlear implant brand) CI recipients who participated in the clinical trial in 2009 were followed-up for 10 years prospectively, providing data to guide doctors and patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From December 2009 to April 2010, 57 subjects underwent Nurotron Venus CI surgery at multiple-centers, and were continued to be followed up and assessed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years after switch on. RESULTS: All recipients were successfully implanted with CIs with no difficulty in subsequent use with one reported case of re-implantation at 9 years after implantation. The aided hearing thresholds were significantly improved at one month after switch on (p < 0.0001) and remained stable afterwards for 10 years. Speech recognition scores were significantly higher than pre-operative results (p < 0.05) and continued to improve till 3 years after switch on. At 10 years post-operation, most subjects had improved QOL scores in most sub-items. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Nurotron Venus CI System provides long-term, stable results in hearing speech assistance capabilities and can improve the quality of life of CI recipients.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , China , Quality of Life , Young Adult , Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Loss/surgery , Prospective Studies , Adolescent , Aged , Child , Speech Perception , East Asian People
16.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0303301, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38857266

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Audio processors (AP) are the external components of hearing implants. User satisfaction with the performance and comfort of their AP is a critical factor in ensuring daily use, which leads to improved hearing outcomes. The aim of this study was to construct and validate an Arabic language translation of the APSQ for use among Arabic-speaking clinicians and patients. DESIGN: The original APSQ was translated into the Arabic language using cross-cultural adaptation measures. The final questionnaire was administered to CI users in electronic form. STUDY SAMPLE: 117 CI users (64 female) participated. A total of 179 ears were assessed. RESULTS: High levels of satisfaction with audio processors were observed among CI users. Item and scale analyses indicate that this version of the APSQ measure a homogeneous and valid construct. CONCLUSION: The Arabic version of the APSQ captures user satisfaction with hearing implant audio processors.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Language , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Female , Surveys and Questionnaires , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Translations , Young Adult
17.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 155(6): 3589-3599, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38829154

ABSTRACT

Frequency importance functions (FIFs) for simulated bimodal hearing were derived using sentence perception scores measured in quiet and noise. Acoustic hearing was simulated using low-pass filtering. Electric hearing was simulated using a six-channel vocoder with three input frequency ranges, resulting in overlap, meet, and gap maps, relative to the acoustic cutoff frequency. Spectral holes present in the speech spectra were created within electric stimulation by setting amplitude(s) of channels to zero. FIFs were significantly different between frequency maps. In quiet, the three FIFs were similar with gradually increasing weights with channels 5 and 6 compared to the first three channels. However, the most and least weighted channels slightly varied depending on the maps. In noise, the patterns of the three FIFs were similar to those in quiet, with steeper increasing weights with channels 5 and 6 compared to the first four channels. Thus, channels 5 and 6 contributed to speech perception the most, while channels 1 and 2 contributed the least, regardless of frequency maps. Results suggest that the contribution of cochlear implant frequency bands for bimodal speech perception depends on the degree of frequency overlap between acoustic and electric stimulation and if noise is absent or present.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation , Noise , Speech Perception , Humans , Noise/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Perceptual Masking , Adult
18.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12787, 2024 06 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834775

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implant users experience difficulties controlling their vocalizations compared to normal hearing peers. However, less is known about their voice quality. The primary aim of the present study was to determine if cochlear implant users' voice quality would be categorized as dysphonic by the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) and smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS). A secondary aim was to determine if vocal quality is further impacted when using bilateral implants compared to using only one implant. The final aim was to determine how residual hearing impacts voice quality. Twenty-seven cochlear implant users participated in the present study and were recorded while sustaining a vowel and while reading a standardized passage. These recordings were analyzed to calculate the AVQI and CPPS. The results indicate that CI users' voice quality was detrimentally affected by using their CI, raising to the level of a dysphonic voice. Specifically, when using their CI, mean AVQI scores were 4.0 and mean CPPS values were 11.4 dB, which indicates dysphonia. There were no significant differences in voice quality when comparing participants with bilateral implants to those with one implant. Finally, for participants with residual hearing, as hearing thresholds worsened, the likelihood of a dysphonic voice decreased.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Voice Quality , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Dysphonia/physiopathology , Speech Acoustics , Cochlear Implantation
19.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(6): 651-655, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865721

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To understand the impact on speech perception for patients experiencing Advanced Bionics V1 series Ultra and Ultra 3D cochlear implant failure. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Adult patients implanted with V1 series devices. INTERVENTIONS: Device integrity and speech perception testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: consonant-nucleus-consonant and AzBio in quiet speech recognition scores. RESULTS: At our institution, 116 V1 series cochlear implants were placed in 114 patients. Thirteen devices in prelingual patients were excluded, leaving 103 (89%) for final analysis. Forty-eight (46.6%) devices were considered as failed using the company provided EFI analysis tool. There were 36 (65.5%) of the remaining 55 devices that consistently tested within normal range; the remainder lost to follow-up with unknown status. Among the 48 device failures, 29 were revised and 19 patients were not revised. Among those not revised, 11 self-opted for observation (57.9%). Observed patients, despite impedance changes meeting failure criteria, had no subjective or objective changes in speech perception. Sentence testing scores for failure patients who elected observation (82.9 ± 11.4%) were significantly higher at failure compared with those opting for revision (55 ± 22.8%, p = 0.006). For those undergoing revision surgery, significant improvement in post-activation scores was noted as compared with time of failure with a mean improvement of 12.9% (p = 0.002, n = 24) for consonant-nucleus-consonant word scores and 17.2% (p = 0.001, n = 19) for AzBio in quiet scores. CONCLUSIONS: Proactive monitoring using EFI identifies a higher rate of Ultra Series V1 device failure than previously reported. However, about 20% of these patients may not have subjective change in hearing or objective decline in test scores and could be observed. Should performance worsen, reimplantation provides significant improvement in speech recognition.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Humans , Speech Perception/physiology , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Prosthesis Failure , Aged, 80 and over
20.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(6): e460-e467, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865720

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Misplacement of electrode arrays in the internal auditory canal (IAC) presents a unique clinical challenge. Speech recognition is limited for cochlear implant (CI) users with misplaced arrays, and there are risks with revision surgery including facial and/or cochlear nerve injury. DATABASES REVIEWED: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. METHODS: A literature search was performed from inception to September 2023. The search terms were designed to capture articles on misplaced arrays and the management options. Articles written in English that described cases of array misplacement into the IAC for children and adults were included. The level of evidence was assessed using Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine guidelines. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight cases of arrays misplaced in the IAC were identified. Thirteen (46%) were patients with incomplete partition type 3 (IP3), and 7 (25%) were patients with common cavity (CC) malformations. Most misplaced arrays were identified postoperatively (19 cases; 68%). Of these cases, 11 (58%) were managed with array removal. No facial nerve injuries were reported with revision surgery. Eight cases (42%) were left in place. Several underwent mapping procedures in an attempt improve the sound quality with the CI. CONCLUSION: Electrode array misplacement in the IAC is a rare complication that reportedly occurs predominately in cases with IP3 and CC malformations. Removal of misplaced arrays from the IAC reportedly has not been associated with facial nerve injuries. Cases identified with IAC misplacement postoperatively can potentially be managed with modified mapping techniques before proceeding with revision surgery.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Ear, Inner , Humans , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Ear, Inner/surgery , Electrodes, Implanted/adverse effects , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...