Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 26.746
Filter
1.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 58(6): 857-861, 2024 Jun 06.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955733

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the disinfection effect of high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection equipment in medical institution settings. Methods: The disinfection effect was evaluated through field tests and laboratory tests. Among them, 135 high-frequency contact points were selected from nine departments in the field test. Samples were collected before and after disinfection, and the disinfection effects of 75% alcohol wipes wiping disinfection, high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection robot disinfection and high-energy pulse ultraviolet handheld disinfection instrument were compared. In the laboratory test, 30 infected areas of the simulated test table were exposed to vertical ultraviolet irradiation and the bacterial-killing rate before and after disinfection was calculated. Results: In the field test, the bacteria-killing rates of 75% alcohol wipes, high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection robot and high-energy pulse ultraviolet handheld disinfection instrument were 94.99%, 91.53% and 95.94%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. The disinfection effect of the high-energy pulse ultraviolet handheld disinfection instrument was better than that of the high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection robot (P values <0.05). In the laboratory test, the killing log value of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli on the carrier were both greater than 3.00. In the simulated field test, the killing log value of Staphylococcus aureus on the surface samples were 4.99. Conclusion: Both the high-energy pulse ultraviolet handheld disinfection instrument and the high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection robot have good disinfection effects, which are similar to the disinfection effects of conventional 75% alcohol wipes.


Subject(s)
Disinfection , Ultraviolet Rays , Disinfection/methods , Cross Infection/prevention & control
2.
Tunis Med ; 102(7): 394-398, 2024 Jul 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982962

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare-associated infections pose a significant public health burden, leading to morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and substantial social and economic costs. Immunocompromised patients are at a heightened risk of nosocomial infections. AIM: This prospective study conducted at Mohammed VI University Hospital of Oujda aimed to assess the microbial ecology of surfaces and air in an immunosuppressed patient room compared to a double hospitalization room. METHODS: Microbiological air purity tests were conducted employing both the sedimentation method and the collision method with the assistance of Microflow Alpha. The sedimentation method used Mueller Hinton with 5% human blood, facilitating the free fall of contaminated dust particles. The collection program employed was set for 10 minutes per 1 m3. For surface sampling, swabs were taken from a 25 cm2 surface. The swabs were immediately forwarded to the Microbiology Laboratory. We carried out both macroscopic and microscopic identification of colonies, followed by definitive biochemical identification using the BD phoenixTM system. Antibiotic susceptibility was assessed through agar diffusion on Muller Hinton medium coupled with the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration. RESULTS: The results revealed a decreased bacterial count within the protective isolation room, in contrast to the standard hospital room. We noted the predominance of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp and Bacillus spp. Staphylococcus aureus and Aspergillus spp, common pathogens in healthcare-associated infections, were notably absent in the protective isolation room. The findings underline the pivotal role of hospital environments in the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. CONCLUSION: The protective isolation room demonstrated effective control of microbial contamination, with fewer and less resistant germs. The study highlighted the significance of air treatment systems in preventing the spread of opportunistic infections. Our study underscored the critical role of microbiological cleanliness in preventing nosocomial infections.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Cross Infection , Humans , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Prospective Studies , Patients' Rooms/organization & administration , Patients' Rooms/statistics & numerical data , Patient Isolation/methods , Hospitals, University , Immunocompromised Host , Tunisia/epidemiology
3.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0305083, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985740

ABSTRACT

Healthcare associated infections (HAIs) are costly but preventable. A limited understanding of the effects of environmental cleaning on the riskiest HAI associated pathogens is a current challenge in HAI prevention. This project aimed to quantify the effects of terminal hospital cleaning practices on HAI pathogens via environmental sampling in three hospitals located throughout the United States. Surfaces were swabbed from 36 occupied patient rooms with a laboratory-confirmed, hospital- or community-acquired infection of at least one of the four pathogens of interest (i.e., Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii), methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecalis/faecium (VRE), and Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile)). Six nonporous, high touch surfaces (i.e., chair handrail, bed handrail, nurse call button, desk surface, bathroom counter near the sink, and a grab bar near the toilet) were sampled in each room for Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) and the four pathogens of interest before and after terminal cleaning. The four pathogens of interest were detected on surfaces before and after terminal cleaning, but their levels were generally reduced. Overall, C. difficile was confirmed on the desk (n = 2), while MRSA (n = 24) and VRE (n = 25) were confirmed on all surface types before terminal cleaning. After cleaning, only MRSA (n = 6) on bed handrail, chair handrail, and nurse call button and VRE (n = 5) on bathroom sink, bed handrail, nurse call button, toilet grab bar, and C. difficile (n = 1) were confirmed. At 2 of the 3 hospitals, pathogens were generally reduced by >99% during terminal cleaning. One hospital showed that VRE increased after terminal cleaning, MRSA was reduced by 73% on the nurse call button, and VRE was reduced by only 50% on the bathroom sink. ATP detections did not correlate with any pathogen concentration. This study highlights the importance of terminal cleaning and indicates room for improvement in cleaning practices to reduce surface contamination throughout hospital rooms.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Cross Infection , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Patients' Rooms , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Housekeeping, Hospital , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolation & purification , Infection Control/methods , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/isolation & purification
4.
Z Gastroenterol ; 62(7): 1032-1041, 2024 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976982

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), as a nosocomial disease, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Even though the incidence of CDI has been declining in Germany in recent years, the individual infection may pose a medical challenge despite therapeutic advances. The aim here is to clarify which gaps practitioners consider to be particularly serious in care and in the existing evidence base. METHODS: In a moderated workshop of German CDI experts the topics considered as relevant were identified. A survey already conducted in five other countries (Australia, France, Great Britain, Canada, and Italy) was adapted and processed by 27 practitioners. During the evaluation, the topics perceived as particularly important were identified, the statements of the specialist groups were compared and changes in opinion were considered. RESULTS: 27 fully completed questionnaires were evaluated. The need for improvement was primarily seen in the prevention of CDI recurrences (74.1%) and the treatment of recurrences (55.6%). Evidence deficits were noted in the treatment of recurrences (55.6%) and identification of risk factors for recurrences (48.1%). Improving care via fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) was named by 70.4%. For guidelines, more clarity (48.1%) and more regular updates (40.7%) were desired. For patients, better education on appropriate antibiotic use (52.0%) and choice of FMT were desired (48.1%). SUMMARY: The German expert view and the international assessment is similar, when asked about the need for improvement in care and evidence gaps in the treatment of patients with CDI: The focus is on prevention and therapy of recurrent CDI. The problem of access to FMT is a German peculiarity that seems to need improvement.


Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections , Humans , Clostridium Infections/therapy , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Germany , Quality Improvement , Internationality , Expert Testimony , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation , Evidence-Based Medicine , Needs Assessment , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic
5.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 78, 2024 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39020438

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare associated infections (HAI) pose a major threat to healthcare systems resulting in an increased burden of disease. Surveillance plays a key role in rapidly identifying these infections and preventing further transmissions. Alas, in German hospitals, the majority of surveillance efforts have been heavily relying on labour intensive processes like manual chart review. In order to be able to identify further starting points for future digital tools and interventions to aid the surveillance of HAI we aimed to gain an understanding of the current state of digitalisation in the context of the general surveillance organisation in German clinics across all care-levels. The end user perspective of infection prevention and control (IPC) professionals was chosen to identify digital interventions that have the biggest impact on the daily surveillance work routines of IPC professionals. Perceived impediments in the advancement of surveillance digitalisation should be explored. METHODS: Following the development of an interview guideline, eight IPC professionals from seven German hospitals of different care levels were questioned in semi- structured interviews between December 2022 and January 2023. These included questions about general surveillance organisation, access to digital data sources, software to aid the surveillance process as well as current issues in the surveillance process and implementation of software systems. Subsequently, after full transcription, the interview sections were categorized in code categories (first deductive then inductive coding) and analysed qualitatively. RESULTS: Results were characterised by high heterogeneity in terms of general surveillance organisation and access to digital data sources. Software configuration of hospital and laboratory information systems (HIS/LIS) as well as patient data management systems (PDMS) varied not only between hospitals of different care levels but also between hospitals of the same care level. Outside research projects, neither fully automatic software nor solutions utilising artificial intelligence have currently been implemented in clinical routine in any of the hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Access to digital data sources and software is increasingly available to aid surveillance of HAI. Nevertheless, surveillance processes in hospitals analysed in this study still heavily rely on manual processes. In the analysed hospitals, there is an implementation and funding gap of (semi-) automatic surveillance solutions in clinical practice, especially in healthcare facilities of lower care levels.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Hospitals , Infection Control , Humans , Germany/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Automation , Software , Population Surveillance/methods
7.
Microb Biotechnol ; 17(7): e14529, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39045894

ABSTRACT

Built environments (BEs) currently represent the areas in which human beings spend most of their life. Consistently, microbes populating BEs mostly derive from human occupants and can be easily transferred from BE to occupants. The hospital microbiome is a paradigmatic example, representing a reservoir for harmful pathogens that can be transmitted to susceptible patients, causing the healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Environmental cleaning is a crucial pillar in controlling BE pathogens and preventing related infections, and chemical disinfectants have been largely used so far towards this aim. However, despite their immediate effect, chemical-based disinfection is unable to prevent recontamination, has a high environmental impact, and can select/increase antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in treated microbes. To overcome these limitations, probiotic-based sanitation (PBS) strategies were recently proposed, built on the use of detergents added with selected probiotics able to displace surrounding pathogens by competitive exclusion. PBS was reported as an effective and low-impact alternative to chemical disinfection, providing stable rebalance of the BE microbiome and significantly reducing pathogens and HAIs compared to disinfectants, without exacerbating AMR and pollution concerns. This minireview summarizes the most significant results obtained by applying PBS in sanitary and non-sanitary settings, which overall suggest that PBS may effectively tackle the infectious risk meanwhile preventing the further spread of pathogenic and resistant microbes.


Subject(s)
Probiotics , Humans , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/microbiology , Sanitation/methods , Disinfection/methods , Communicable Diseases/transmission , Communicable Diseases/microbiology , Communicable Diseases/drug therapy , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Detergents/pharmacology , Disinfectants/pharmacology
8.
S Afr Med J ; 114(4): e1296, 2024 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39041407

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global threat, partly fueled by antimicrobial overuse. Paediatric inpatients are particularly vulnerable to infections, leading to high antimicrobial consumption. In low-to-middle income countries (LMICs) like South Africa, research on antimicrobial usage for neonatal and paediatric healthcare-associated infections (HAI) is limited. This cross-sectional study evaluated antimicrobial usage in three academic public sector hospitals in South Africa to improve appropriateness. 22.9% of hospitalised children received at least one prescribed antimicrobial, with neonates, infants, and adolescents having higher prescription rates for HAIs. Common antimicrobials prescribed included beta-lactamase sensitive penicillin, aminoglycosides, and carbapenems. Antimicrobial selection aligned with the WHO AWaRe classification system. HIV infection did not emerge as a risk factor for HAIs or excessive antimicrobial usage. The policy brief recommends several strategies, summarized by the acronym 'PRACTICE,' to optimize antimicrobial prescribing practices. These include implementing standardized policies for empiric antimicrobial use, routine review of antimicrobial therapy, age-specific antimicrobial stewardship programs, and continued collaborative efforts and research. Individualized treatment plans, improved infection prevention and control measures, ongoing surveillance, and exploring electronic technology for antimicrobial stewardship are also crucial. Addressing antimicrobial usage is imperative to combat the growing threat of AMR and improve patient outcomes in LMICs like South Africa.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , South Africa , Child , Infant , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Infant, Newborn , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Female
9.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 77, 2024 Jul 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39014488

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Effective infection prevention and control programs can positively influence quality of care, increase patient safety, and protect health care providers. Chlorine, a widely used and effective chemical disinfectant, is recommended for infection prevention and control in health care settings. However, lack of consistent chlorine availability limits its use. Electrolytic chlorine generators can address limited chlorine supply and stockouts by enabling onsite production of readily usable, high-quality chlorine cost-effectively. We report the feasibility (i.e., performance, acceptability, chlorine availability, and cost) of the electrolytic STREAM Disinfectant Generator (Aqua Research, New Mexico, USA) device for infection prevention and control in primary health care facilities in Uganda. METHODS: We installed STREAM devices in 10 primary health care facilities in central and western Uganda. Commercial chlorine inventory records (stock cards) were reviewed in each facility to calculate average liters of chlorine received and used per month. These values were compared with actual STREAM chlorine production volumes over the study period to determine its impact on chlorine availability. We collected acceptability data from a purposive sample of device users (n = 16), hospital administrators (n = 10), and district health officers (n = 6) who had been directly involved in the operation or supervision of the STREAM device. We descriptively analyzed the acceptability data by user group and evaluated qualitative responses manually using a thematic approach. Cost data were normalized and modeled to determine a break-even and cost-savings analysis across a five-year period (the minimum expected lifespan of the STREAM device). RESULTS: Chlorine was consistently available without any reported stockouts during the evaluation period. STREAM chlorine production resulted in a 36.9 percent cost-savings over a five-year period compared to commercial chlorine. User acceptability of the STREAM device was high among STREAM operators, hospital administrators, and district health officers, with all respondents reporting that STREAM moderately or significantly improved infection prevention and control practices in the health facility. Overall, 88 percent of device users and 100 percent of hospital administrators wished to continue using the STREAM device instead of commercial chlorine products. CONCLUSION: The STREAM device has demonstrated significant potential to strengthen infection prevention and control practices in health care facilities in Uganda. Based on the preliminary results, the STREAM device should be considered a promising tool for district hospitals and large health centers facing infection prevention and control challenges in Uganda and elsewhere, provided water and electricity are available. Going forward, implementation of the STREAM device could also be considered in smaller health care facilities in Uganda and elsewhere.


Subject(s)
Chlorine , Disinfectants , Health Facilities , Primary Health Care , Uganda , Humans , Disinfection/methods , Infection Control/methods , Cross Infection/prevention & control
10.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B ; 25(7): 628-632, 2024 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39011682

ABSTRACT

Airborne transmission is among the most frequent types of nosocomial infection. Recent years have witnessed frequent outbreaks of airborne diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2002, Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) in 2012, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with the latter being on the rampage since the end of 2019 and bringing the effect of aerosols on health back to the fore (Gralton et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2021). An increasing number of studies have shown that certain highly transmissible pathogens can maintain long-term stability and efficiently spread through aerosols (Leung, 2021; Lv et al., 2021). As reported previously, influenza viruses that can spread efficiently through aerosols remain stable for a longer period compared to those that cannot. The World Health Organization (WHO) has stated that aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) play an important role in aerosol transmission in hospitals (Calderwood et al., 2021). AGPs, referring to medical procedures that produce aerosols, including dental procedures, endotracheal intubation, sputum aspiration, and laparoscopic surgeries, have been reported to be significantly associated with an increased risk of nosocomial infection among medical personnel (Hamilton, 2021).


Subject(s)
Aerosols , COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Endoscopes , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Cross Infection/transmission , Cross Infection/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Disinfection/methods , Betacoronavirus , Air Microbiology
11.
J Nurs Adm ; 54(7-8): 409-415, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39016556

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to project the impact of legislated nurse staffing ratios on patient-, staff-, and system-level outcomes for Prospective Payment System (PPS) hospitals in Montana. BACKGROUND: In 2023, House Bill 568 was introduced in Montana focused on legislating hospital safe nursing standards. METHODS: A quantitative design was used for a convenience sample of Montana PPS hospitals. Data were gathered through a newly developed survey and from other publicly available sources for the years 2018 to 2022. Independent t tests were conducted when appropriate with the significance threshold set at 0.05. RESULTS: Projections indicate no significant change in patient outcome metrics accompanied by increases in labor requirements, slower emergency department throughput times, and decreases in hospital operating margins. CONCLUSIONS: In Montana, legislating nurse staffing ratios would have downstream implications inconsistent with the intended impact on patient safety, emphasizing the complexity of variables within and external to the healthcare system that drive patient-, staff-, and system-level outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Montana , Humans , Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Nursing Staff, Hospital/economics , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/legislation & jurisprudence , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/economics , Cross Infection/economics , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Economics, Hospital
12.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 15431, 2024 07 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965239

ABSTRACT

To detect the contaminate of faucets in hospitals and the splash during hand washing, and to explore the reasonable layout of hand washing pools. Two faucets with roughly the same spatial layout in the ICU of a third-class first-class general hospital were selected, and the farthest splashing distance and specific splashing points were measured by color paper. Samples were detected by ATP detection technology and routine microbial detection method, and the contaminate of faucets was analyzed. After 72 h of daily hand-washing activities, the furthest distance to the splash point was about 100 cm around the faucet, and the place 40-110 cm around the faucet was contaminated seriously. The farthest distance that the splash point reached was about 80 cm around the faucet with the center of the circle, and the area 40-60 cm around the faucet was heavily contaminated. The distance from the water outlet of the long handle and the short handle faucet to the detection point had a high negative correlation (r = - 0.811, P < 0.001) and a moderate negative correlation (r = - 0.475, P = 0.001) with the number of splash points, respectively. The qualified rates of ATP detection and microbial culture were 25% and 15%, respectively. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and other pathogenic bacteria were detected in the water outlet of the faucet and the surrounding environment. Safe hand hygiene facilities are one of the important guarantees of hand hygiene effect. Clean objects and objects related to patients should not be placed within 1 m range near the water outlet of faucet. Anti-splash baffle should be installed as much as possible when conditions permit to reduce the contaminate caused by splash during hand washing.


Subject(s)
Hand Disinfection , Intensive Care Units , Humans , Cross Infection/prevention & control
13.
Clin Nurse Spec ; 38(4): 189-192, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38889060

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has highlighted the strong association between healthcare-associated infections and the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes. This process improvement project provided an evidence-based workflow analysis of pleuravideoscope reprocessing to validate and implement safe practices in the pulmonary clinic and sterile processing department. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT/PROGRAM: A multidisciplinary team created an audit tool to complete infection control risk assessment using Lean Six Sigma methodology. OUTCOME: The risk assessment identified gaps in clinical practice, prompting corrective measures using a shared decision-making approach. The organization updated standard operating procedures, provided training and competency assessments, and purchased single-use pleuravideoscopes. These initiatives addressed the deficiencies and reinforced a culture of continuous process improvement and patient safety. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary teams should perform comprehensive reviews of facility processes and assess the risks related to infection control to identify optimal pleuravideoscope workflows for the healthcare institution. The involvement of a clinical nurse specialist is advantageous, as they possess the expertise necessary to facilitate collaborative efforts among team members spanning various departments. By leveraging the insights and skills of diverse professionals, healthcare organizations can optimize their reprocessing programs and enhance patient safety.


Subject(s)
Sterilization , Humans , Nurse Clinicians , Endoscopes/microbiology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infection Control , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Nursing Evaluation Research
14.
BMJ Open Qual ; 13(Suppl 1)2024 Jun 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886106

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among admitted neonates. Healthcare-associated infection (HAI) is a significant contributor in this cohort. LOCAL PROBLEM: In our unit, 16.1% of the admissions developed sepsis during their stay in the unit. METHOD: We formed a team of all stakeholders to address the issue. The problem was analysed using various tools, and the main contributing factor was low compliance with hand hygiene and handling of intravenous lines. INTERVENTIONS: The scrub the hub/aseptic non-touch technique/five moments of hand hygiene/hand hygiene (S-A-F-H) protocol was formulated as a quality improvement initiative, and various interventions were done to ensure compliance with hand hygiene, five moments of hand hygiene, aseptic non-touch technique. The data were collected and analysed regularly with the team members, and actions were planned accordingly. RESULTS: Over a few months, the team could reduce the incidence of HAI by 50%, which has been sustained for over a year. The improvement in compliance with the various aspects of S-A-F-H increased. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with hand hygiene steps, five moments of hand hygiene and an aseptic non-touch technique using quality improvement methodology led to a reduction in neonatal sepsis incidence in the unit. Regular reinforcement is required to maintain awareness of asepsis practices and implementation in day-to-day care and to bring about behavioural changes.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Hand Hygiene , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Neonatal Sepsis , Quality Improvement , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Sepsis/prevention & control , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hand Hygiene/methods , Hand Hygiene/standards , Hand Hygiene/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence/standards , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/standards , Female
15.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 592, 2024 Jun 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886634

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As an emerging infectious disease with a heterogenous and uncertain transmission pattern, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has created a catastrophe in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and posed a significant challenge to infection control practices (ICPs) in healthcare settings. While the unique characteristics of psychiatric patients and clinical settings may make the implementation of ICPs difficult, evidence is lacking for compliance with ICPs among healthcare workers (HCWs) in a psychiatric setting during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional multi-method study based on participant unobtrusive observation coupled with the completion of a self-administered ICP survey was conducted to assess compliance with ICPs among HCWs in a psychiatric inpatient ward in a regional hospital. An online checklist, called eRub, was used to record the performance of HCWs in hand hygiene (HH) and other essential ICPs. Furthermore, a well-validated questionnaire (i.e., Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale, CSPS) was used to collect the participants' self-reported ICP compliance for later comparison. RESULTS: A total of 2,670 ICP opportunities were observed from January to April 2020. The overall compliance rate was 42.6%. HCWs exhibited satisfactory compliance to the wearing of mask (91.2%) and the handling of clinical waste (87.5%); suboptimal compliance to the handling of sharp objects (67.7%) and linen (72.7%); and poor compliance to HH (3.3%), use of gloves (40.9%), use of personal protective equipment (20%), and disinfection of used surface/area (0.4%). The compliance rates of the nurses and support staff to HH were significantly different (χ2 = 123.25, p < 0.001). In the self-reported survey, the overall compliance rate for ICPs was 64.6%. CONCLUSION: The compliance of HCWs in a psychiatric inpatient ward to ICPs during the COVID-19 pandemic ranged from poor to suboptimal. This result was alarming. Revisions of current ICP guidelines and policies that specifically target barriers in psychiatric settings will be necessary.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Guideline Adherence , Health Personnel , Infection Control , Self Report , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Infection Control/methods , Health Personnel/psychology , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Female , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hand Hygiene/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , Personal Protective Equipment/statistics & numerical data
16.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 64, 2024 Jun 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886813

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the initial phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, masking has been widely accepted in healthcare institutions to mitigate the risk of healthcare-associated infection. Evidence, however, is still scant and the role of masks in preventing healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 acquisition remains unclear.We investigated the association of variation in institutional mask policies with healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections in acute care hospitals in Switzerland during the BA.4/5 2022 wave. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 infections in hospitalized patients between June 1 and September 5, 2022, were obtained from the "Hospital-based surveillance of COVID-19 in Switzerland"-database and classified as healthcare- or community-associated based on time of disease onset. Institutions provided information regarding institutional masking policies for healthcare workers and other prevention policies. The percentage of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections was calculated per institution and per type of mask policy. The association of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections with mask policies was tested using a negative binominal mixed-effect model. RESULTS: We included 2'980 SARS-CoV-2 infections from 13 institutions, 444 (15%) were classified as healthcare-associated. Between June 20 and June 30, 2022, six (46%) institutions switched to a more stringent mask policy. The percentage of healthcare-associated infections subsequently declined in institutions with policy switch but not in the others. In particular, the switch from situative masking (standard precautions) to general masking of HCW in contact with patients was followed by a strong reduction of healthcare-associated infections (rate ratio 0.39, 95% CI 0.30-0.49). In contrast, when compared across hospitals, the percentage of health-care associated infections was not related to mask policies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest switching to a more stringent mask policy may be beneficial during increases of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections at an institutional level.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Masks , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Switzerland/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Hospitals , Aged , Health Personnel , Infection Control/methods , Organizational Policy , Aged, 80 and over
17.
Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex ; 81(3): 182-190, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38941636

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are among the most epidemiologically relevant health care-associated infections. The aseptic non-touch technique (ANTT) is a standardized practice used to prevent CLABSIs. In a pediatric hospital, the overall CLABSI rate was 1.92/1000 catheter days (CD). However, in one unit, the rate was 5.7/1000 CD. METHODS: Nurses were trained in ANTT. For the implementation, plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were completed. Adherence monitoring of the ANTT and epidemiological surveillance were performed. RESULTS: ANTT adherence of 95% was achieved after 6 PDSA cycles. Hand hygiene and general cleaning reached 100% adherence. Port disinfection and material collection had the lowest adherence rates, with 76.2% and 84.7%, respectively. The CLABSI rate decreased from 5.7 to 1.26/1000 CD. CONCLUSION: The implementation of ANTT helped reduce the CLABSI rate. Training and continuous monitoring are key to maintaining ANTT adherence.


INTRODUCCIÓN: Las infecciones relacionadas con catéteres venosos centrales son unas de las infecciones asociadas a la atención de salud con mayor relevancia epidemiológica. La técnica aséptica «no tocar¼ es una práctica estandarizada que se utiliza para prevenir estas infecciones. En un hospital pediátrico, la tasa de infecciones relacionadas con catéteres venosos centrales fue de 1.92/1000 días de catéter. Sin embargo, en una de las unidades la tasa fue de 5.7/1000 días de catéter. MÉTODO: Se capacitaron enfermeras en la técnica aséptica «no tocar¼. Para la implementación se cumplieron ciclos de planificar-hacer-estudiar-actuar (PHEA). Se realizaron seguimiento de la adherencia a la técnica y vigilancia epidemiológica. RESULTADOS: Se logró una adherencia a la técnica aséptica «no tocar¼ del 95% después de seis ciclos. La higiene de manos y la limpieza general alcanzaron un 100% de cumplimiento. La desinfección de los puertos y la recolección de material alcanzaron la menor adherencia, con un 76.2% y un 84.7%, respectivamente. La tasa de infecciones relacionadas con catéteres venosos centrales disminuyó de 5.7 a 1.26 por 1000 días de catéter. CONCLUSIONES: La implementación de la técnica aséptica «no tocar¼ ayudó en la reducción de infecciones relacionadas con catéteres venosos centrales. La capacitación y el seguimiento continuo son clave para mantener el cumplimiento de la técnica.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Cross Infection , Guideline Adherence , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Hand Hygiene/standards , Hand Hygiene/methods , Child , Asepsis/methods , Disinfection/methods
19.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 37(4): 277-281, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38843441

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Infection prevention and control practices remain the bedrock of healthcare associated infection prevention and outbreak and epidemic control efforts. However, issues in supply chain management can hinder these efforts, as exemplified by various public health emergencies. This review explores the key role of supply chains in infection prevention and explores specific challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: In all of the critical components of infection prevention and control - hand hygiene, personal protective equipment, sterile supplies, environmental disinfection, and waste management - disruptions in supply chains have led to limited availability and dissemination. SUMMARY: Strategies to mitigate these resource constraints in the inter-epidemic period will also be highlighted. The infection prevention workforce is well poised to inform supply chain dynamics. Without robust and adequate supply chains, infection prevention and control efforts suffer which perpetuates healthcare-associated infections, clusters, and epidemics.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Infection Control , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disinfection/methods , Equipment and Supplies/supply & distribution , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Hand Hygiene , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL