Taurolidine-containing solution for reducing cardiac implantable electronic device infection-early report from the European TauroPace™ registry.

INTRODUCTION: Infection is a significant complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy. The European TauroPace™ Registry investigates the safety and efficacy of TauroPace™ (TP), an antimicrobial solution containing taurolidine, designed to prevent CIED infections. METHODS: This multicenter study included patients undergoing CIED procedures at participating centers where TP was used as a disinfectant for external hardware surfaces and an antiseptic for irrigating surgical sites. All patients eligible for CIED placement with adjunctive TP as the standard of care were included. Other aspects of CIED procedures adhered to current guidelines. Data on CIED-related infective endocarditis, CIED pocket infection, device and procedure-related complications, adverse events, and all-cause mortality were prospectively collected for 12 months. In cases of revision, the previous procedure was censored, and a new procedure was created. Binomial and Kaplan-Meier statistics were employed to analyze event rates. RESULTS: From January 2020 to November 2022, TP was used in 822 out of 1170 CIED procedures. Among patients who completed the 3-month follow-up, no CIED pocket infections were observed, and one case of CIED-related infective endocarditis was reported. In the 12-month follow-up cohort, two additional local pocket CIED infections were observed, resulting in a total of three major CIED infections within 1 year after the CIED placement procedure. The 3-month and 12-month major CIED infection rates were 0.125% and 0.51%, respectively. During the observation a complication rate of 4.4% was reported. No adverse events related to TP were observed. CONCLUSIONS: TP appears to be effective and safe in preventing CIED infections. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT04735666.

Percutaneous Extraction of Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker/Defibrillator Leads-A Single-Center Experience.

Background and Objectives: The number of cardiac pacemakers being used has increased in recent decades, and this increase has led to a rise in device-related complications, requiring percutaneous device extraction. Our aim was to present our single-center clinical experience in percutaneous lead extractions. Materials and Methods: We analyzed an observational retrospective cohort study of 93 patients for the transvenous removal of a total of 163 endocardial leads. We evaluated the device details, indications, lead characteristics, extraction methods, complications, reimplantation procedure, follow-up data, effectiveness, and safety. Results: Patients' mean age was 68.6 ± 11.6 years. Lead extraction indications were pocket infection in 33 (35.5%), lead dysfunction in 33 (35.5%), and system upgrade in 21 (23%) cases, and lead endocarditis in 6 (6%) cases. The duration from implantation to extraction time was a detected median of 43 (24-87) months. The most common retracted lead type was the RV defibrillator lead (62%), and the lead fixation type was active for one hundred (61%) patients. A new device was inserted in 74 (80%) patients, and the device type was most commonly a CRT-D (61%). Patients were followed up at a median of 17 (8-36) months, and 18 patients (19%) died at follow-up. Complete procedural success was obtained in 78 (84%) patients, and clinical procedural success was obtained in 83 (89%) patients. Procedural failure was detected in 15 (16%) patients. Major and minor complications were detected in 10 (11%) and 6 (6.5%) patients, respectively. The most common minor complication was pocket hematoma. Conclusions: Our experience suggests that transvenous lead extraction has a high success rate with an acceptable risk of procedural complications. The simple manual traction method has a high rate of procedural success, despite a high dwell time of the lead.

Bradycardia-dependent conduction block of the atrial tissue in a patient after double-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation.

Seldom are reports of phase 4 block or bradycardia-dependent conduction block in atrial tissue found in the literature. Here, we describe the case of a patient with sick sinus syndrome with Torsade de Pointes who, following the implantation of a double-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator, developed intra-atrial bradycardia-dependent conduction block. The patient's optimal pacing parameters were achieved by raising the rate.

Cardiac implantable electronic device infection awareness - A European survey amongst implanting physicians.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) infections pose significant mortality and morbidity despite optimal treatment. This survey aimed to understand whether and how the risk of CIED infection is assessed and mitigated in clinical practice in Europe, and to detect gaps with respect to EHRA recommendations. METHODS: An Expert Group of 8 European cardiologists with specific expertise across CIED therapy designed and distributed electronically a survey to a number of European Cardiologists. RESULTS: 302 physicians from 18 European countries responded to the survey. 288/302 (95%) physicians agreed that CIED-related infections represent a burden on healthcare resources and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. 285/302 respondents (94%) primarily assess the risk of CIED infections by only evaluating the patient's clinical profile (137/302, 46%) or with the support of a risk score (148/302, 49%). Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis is used by 282/302 (93%), followed by the implantation of the lowest number of leads possible (182/302, 60%), and by the use of an antibacterial envelope (173/302, 57%). 230/302 respondents (76%) declared that there is need for clear and concise guidelines and more sensitive risk-scores for CIED infection, to maximize the chances of preventative strategies. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrates a high level of awareness about the multifaceted issue of CIED infection, however, it also highlights an incomplete penetration of scoring systems for risk stratification owing to their perceived limitations, and detects a strong commitment to increase the effectiveness of preventative strategies.

Incidence and long-term outcomes of upper limb deep vein thrombosis associated with intracardiac devices: analysis of bleeding, recurrence, and sequelae.

Pacemakers (PM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are vital devices in contemporary clinical practice, but their growing adoption poses challenges. Complications, including lead migration, infections, and post-implantation venous thrombosis, underscore the importance of comprehensive investigation. This retrospective observational study enrolled patients diagnosed with upper limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) secondary to intracardiac devices at a tertiary hospital from 2015 to 2022. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence and long-term outcomes (bleeding, DVT recurrence and sequelae) in these patients. Across the study period, 2681 intracardiac devices were implanted, with 12 cases of upper limb DVT documented. The majority of patients were male (91.7%), with a mean age of 63.92 years. DVT occurred in patients with PM (50%), implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (25%) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (25%). Treatment encompassed low-molecular-weight heparin (91.7%) during the acute episode and long-term anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (75%) or vitamin K antagonists (25%). Over a mean follow-up period of 33.17 months, half of the patients exhibited long-term sequelae, notably collateral circulation (66.7%). Remarkably, no thrombosis recurrences were observed during follow-up. However, one patient (8.3%) experienced a major bleeding event during treatment, and one patient (8.3%) required device removal (PM) due to persistent symptoms. This study revealed upper limb DVT occurred in 0.45% of patients after intracardiac device implantation. Rate of thrombosis recurrence was low during follow-up. Although half of the patients developed long-term sequelae, the need for prolonged anticoagulant therapy in these cases remains uncertain.

Efficacy of Hypothermic Compression Bandages in Cardiac Device Surgical Wounds: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Pocket hematoma is the most prevalent complication with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), especially in patients who are undergoing oral anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of hypothermic compression bandaging versus conventional compression bandaging for the prevention of surgical wound hematoma of CIEDs in patients who are undergoing chronic anticoagulant drug use and/or antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: This was a single-center randomized prospective study. The intervention group received a hypothermic compression bandage, and the control group received a conventional compression bandage. The primary endpoint was the appearance of hematoma 10 days after the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients participated in the study. The mean age of the participants was 73.77 ± 10.68 years, and 74.8% were men. In the intervention group, 5.88% (n = 18) of patients developed ecchymosis, and 1.3% (n = 4) developed mild hematoma. In the control group, 5.88% (n = 18) of patients developed ecchymosis, and 2.9% (n = 9) developed mild hematoma. No patient in either group had a severe hematoma. No significant differences were observed between the two types of dressing in any of the three degrees of hematoma. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that compression bandaging with or without hypothermic therapy effectively prevents pocket hematoma of CIEDs in patients at high risk of bleeding.

Effects of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads on the Tricuspid Valve and Right Ventricle: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: There are no randomized data to inform the extent to which transvenous cardiac leads cause tricuspid regurgitation (TR). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the effect of a transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD) on TR severity, and secondarily, on right ventricular (RV) size and function. METHODS: We evaluated TR severity before and 6 months after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion in a post hoc analysis of adults randomized to receive a transvenous (n = 252) or subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) (n = 251) device. TR and RV size and systolic function were assessed by echocardiographic images analyzed in a core laboratory. RESULTS: At baseline, at least mild TR was present in 30% of individuals. At 6 months, the proportion of participants with any TR in the TV-ICD group was 42% vs 19% in the S-ICD group (P < 0.001). The proportion with moderate or severe TR was 7% in the TV-ICD group vs 2% in the S-ICD group (P = 0.021). At 6 months, the OR of at least 1 grade worsening of TR in the TV-ICD group as compared with the S-ICD group was 7.2 (95% CI: 3.3-15.8; P < 0.001). There were no differences between groups with respect to RV size or systolic function. CONCLUSIONS: Six months following TV-ICD insertion, there was a 7-fold increase in the risk of at least 1 grade worsening of TR, with 7% of individuals having TR that was moderate or severe. There was no detectable difference in RV size or function; however, longer follow-up is needed.

Incidence and economics of transvenous ICD lead complications: Implications for tricuspid valve function and interventions.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are used globally and are reliable, but complications related to transvenous leads remain a concern. Evidence related to the incidence and costs of those complications is heterogeneous with respect to scope and healthcare system. This analysis aims to create estimates of the incidence and costs of tricuspid valve (TV) complications, lead failures, and lead extractions from a single large real-world data set. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective longitudinal cohort study used the deidentified Medicare Fee for Service administrative claims database. A total of 116 036 patients with de novo transvenous ICD implant were analyzed. Mean hospital costs were $26 903 for tricuspid valve complications, $20 851 for lead failures, and $22 278 for lead extractions. CONCLUSIONS: Transvenous ICD lead complications incur significant costs to patients, hospitals, and payers when they occur. Advancements in lead technology that reduce these complications could bring significant clinical and economic value.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices: An update.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are a core component in the management of heart rhythm disorders. The complexity of devices, the information gathered and therapy delivered by CIEDs continues to advance at pace. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to provide an update on advances in CIED technology and how this applies to managing patients with CIEDs in general practice. DISCUSSION: In recent years, there have been notable advances in CIED technology. These include widespread magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and automated algorithms to assist in the clinical management of patients. There is the ability for clinicians and pacemaker clinics to monitor devices remotely, avoiding in-clinic visits. Options are now available for leadless pacemakers and subcutaneous defibrillators as an alternative to indwelling leads and associated infection and vascular issues. Techniques have been developed to allow leads to capture the native conduction system, providing physiological cardiac activation (conduction system pacing) for treatment and prevention of heart failure.

An unusual cause of inappropriate shocks delivered by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) complications present significant challenges in clinical practice, especially in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. Common adverse events include infection, lead malfunction, and device migration. Twiddler's Syndrome, a rare but serious CIED complication characterised by patient manipulation causing lead displacement and device malfunction, is often underreported. The literature consists mainly of case reports and small series, providing limited guidance on prevention and management. As CIEDs are critical for managing cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure, understanding and addressing Twiddler's Syndrome is essential. This case report aims to contribute to the literature by detailing a case of Twiddler's Syndrome, emphasising the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for optimal management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 59-year-old male presented with discomfort around his implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) site and the sternal area over the past two days. He denied pain, dyspnoea, or dizziness. Clinical examination revealed a normal heart rhythm and no peripheral pulse deficit. Ultrasound revealed a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The atrial lead was not visible, and the shock coil was misplaced. ICD interrogation showed inappropriate shocks due to sensing artifacts and exit block in both leads, with no arrhythmias detected. An X-ray confirmed lead dislodgement and significant entanglement in the pocket. The patient was diagnosed with Twiddler's Syndrome and scheduled for surgical revision. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), characterised by left ventricular dilatation and dysfunction, accounts for a significant proportion of systolic heart failure cases. Despite advancements in heart failure management, DCM patients remain at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD), making ICD implantation crucial. However, CIED placement carries risks of complications, including Twiddler's Syndrome. This condition can lead to lead dislodgement and device malfunction, resulting in inappropriate shocks and potential patient harm. In this case, a single-session extraction and re-implantation were successfully performed using a multidisciplinary approach, emphasising the importance of comprehensive management strategies to address such complications effectively. Regular follow-up showed no adverse events, highlighting the procedure's success and the potential benefits of using advanced antimicrobial adjuncts to prevent infections. This case underscores the need for awareness and standardised protocols for managing Twiddler's Syndrome to improve patient outcomes in the growing population of CIED recipients.

Evaluation of tricuspid valve regurgitation following transvenous rotational mechanical lead extraction.

AIMS: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is potentially complicated by significant tricuspid valve regurgitation increase (TRI). However, there are limited data on the effect of the bidirectional rotational mechanical sheaths on significant TRI. The aim of the present study was to investigate the rate of significant changes in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) severity following mechanical rotational TLE and their outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 158 patients (mean age 66 ± 16.9 years) undergoing mechanical rotational TLE, acute changes in TR severity were assessed by echocardiography evaluation. A significant acute TRI was defined as an increase of at least one grade with a post-extraction severity at least moderate. A total of 290 leads were extracted (mean implant duration, 93 ± 65 months). Significant TRI was noted in 5.7% of patients, and it was linked to tricuspid valve damage, TLE infection indication, and longer lead implant duration. Univariate predictors of significant TRI included implant duration of all leads [odds ratio (OR) 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.003-1.018; P = 0.001] and right ventricular leads (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.004-1.017; P = 0.002). Severe increase of TR following TLE was an independent predictor of mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 5.20; 95% CI 1.44-18.73; P = 0.012 ] along with severe systolic dysfunction (HR 2.37; 95% CI 1.01-5.20; P = 0.032), and systemic infection (HR 2.28; 95% CI 1.06-4.89; P = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Significant TRI was detected in 5.7% of patients following transvenous rotational mechanical lead extraction. The duration of lead implantation emerged as the sole predictor of significant TRI. Physicians engaged in TLE should exercise greater vigilance for this potential complication.

Outcomes in patients with definite and possible infective endocarditis related to a cardiac implantable electronic device.

INTRODUCTION: Diagnosing lead­related infective endocarditis (LRIE) often poses a substantial challenge. Current diagnostic criteria include definite and possible LRIE. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with definite and possible LRIE undergoing transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from 3782 patients undergoing TLE between 2006 and 2023 was performed. The study included 838 patients with definite and possible LRIE, whose clinical data on short- and long­term survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The comparison of clinical data showed more frequent occurrences of vegetations (81.58% vs 37.21%; P <0.001), positive blood cultures (66.12% vs 51.64%; P <0.001), and septic pulmonary embolism (40.14% vs 13.78%; P <0.001) in the patients with definite LRIE. Long­term mortality of patients with definite and possible LRIE (median [interquartile range] follow-up, 4.61 [1.04-9.4] and 5.06 [2.07-8.75] years, respectively) was 61.14% and 49.29% (P <0.001). Predictors of mortality in patients with definite LRIE included: advanced age, low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), comorbidities, septic pulmonary embolism, positive blood culture, and presence of an abandoned lead. In possible LRIE, only the influence of advanced age, low LVEF, and comorbidities was demonstrated. There was no documented evidence of a direct impact of a delayed diagnosis on the long­term survival of patients after TLE. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed better survival in patients with possible LRIE than with definite LRIE, which confirms the need to extend the diagnostic criteria. Introducing appropriate treatment at an early stage of infection improves the prognosis.

Cutibacterium Species Valvular and Cardiac Device-Related Infective Endocarditis: Contemporary Data From the GAMES Prospective Cohort (2008-2023).

BACKGROUND: Information on infective endocarditis (IE) caused by Cutibacterium spp. is limited and new Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) criteria have not yet been properly assessed. We examined clinical characteristics, outcomes, and performance of diagnostic tests for Cutibacterium valvular and cardiac implantable electronic device-related IE (CIED-IE). METHODS: Data corresponding to all episodes of Cutibacterium IE recorded from 2008 to 2023 in a prospective national cohort including 46 Spanish hospitals were examined. Possible IE cases were reassessed using the new criteria. The sensitivity of blood cultures, valvular and CIED cultures, and polymerase chain reaction of the 16S rRNA gene and sequencing (16SPCR) was evaluated. RESULTS: Of 6692 episodes of IE, 67 (1%) were caused by Cutibacterium spp. with 85% affecting men. Of these, 50 were valve-related (45 prosthetic, 5 native) and 17 CIED-related. The new criteria identified 8 additional cases and reclassified 15 as definite IE. Intracardiac complications (abscess, pseudoaneurysm, perforation, or intracardiac fistula) occurred in 23 of 50 (46%) valvular IE episodes, leading to 18% mortality, and up to 40% mortality if surgery was indicated but could not be performed. All CIED-IE cases underwent device removal and no deaths were recorded. Positive diagnosis rates for blood cultures, valve/device cultures, and 16SPCR were 52%, 70%, and 82%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cutibacterium IE is a rare yet potentially life-threatening condition that warrants a high index of suspicion in men with endovascular prosthetic material. The new Duke-ISCVID criteria and molecular techniques are useful for its diagnosis. Considering a significant complication rate, cardiac surgery and removal of CIEDs play a key role in reducing mortality.

[VT ablation - a technically complex procedure]. / Ablationsbehandling hos patienter med strukturell hjärtsjukdom.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease is potentially life threatening, and most patients have an indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Catheter ablation is an effective therapeutic strategy to reduce the risk of VT recurrence and subsequent ICD therapies. However, VT ablation is a technically complex procedure with significant risks and should be performed in experienced centers with appropriate resources. While several reports on outcome and procedural risks have been published, there is currently no data from Sweden. In addition to this literature review, we have analyzed VT ablation outcome data from our center. In 2021 and 2022, 68 VT ablations were performed in 60 patients with structural heart disease. After a median follow-up of 20 months, 18 percent had recurrent VT and there were 2 major adverse events (stroke and complete atrioventricular block). Seven patients died from non-arrhythmia related causes during follow-up. A large proportion (68 percent) were subacute procedures which are associated with a higher periprocedural risk. Referral for VT ablation earlier in the course of disease progression may likely further improve outcomes.

Outcomes of complete removal versus conservative therapy in cardiac implantable electronic device infections - A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Complete removal of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is recommended in patients with CIED infections, including both systemic and localized pocket infection. The aim of the study was to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive assessment of evidence relating to the effect of complete CIED extraction in patients with a CIED infection. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting short- and mid-term outcomes in patients who had a device infection or infective endocarditis (IE) and underwent complete removal of the cardiac device (generator and leads) compared to those who received conservative therapy (no removal, partial removal, local antibiotic infiltration or isolated antibiotic therapy). The primary outcome was reinfection/relapse. Secondary outcomes were short-term (30-day/in-hospital) and mid-term (mean follow-up: 43.0 months) mortality. Random effects model was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies met the criteria for inclusion in the final analysis. Patients with complete CIED extraction (n = 905) exhibited a lower rate of relapse/re-infection compared to patients (n = 195) with a conservative treatment approach (n = 195, OR 0.02, 95%CI 0.01-0.06, p < 0.0001, mean-follow-up: 16.1 months). Additionally, these patients displayed a lower short- (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.23-0.69, p = 0.01) and mid-term (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.34-0.78, p = 0.002) mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis indicates that patients with a CIED infection who undergo complete CIED extraction exhibit a lower rate of relapse/re-infection. Additionally, a lower short- and mid-term mortality is observed, although it is acknowledged that this outcome may be influenced by treatment allocation bias.

Digoxin and Risk of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia and Death in ICD Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Some studies have shown digoxin use to be associated with adverse outcomes, including increased mortality. There are limited data on whether digoxin use is associated with increased risk of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess whether digoxin use is associated with increased risk of VT/VF in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with a primary prevention ICD in landmark clinical trials. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of patients with an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator who were enrolled in 4 landmark MADIT trials (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trials). We employed propensity score quintile stratification for treatment with digoxin as well as additional multivariable adjustment to assess the risk of digoxin vs no-digoxin therapy for the endpoints of first and recurrent VT/VF and all-cause mortality. The proportional hazards regression models for arrhythmia-specific endpoints incorporated adjustments for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: At baseline, 1,155 of 4,499 patients were on digoxin (26%). After propensity score quintile stratification, patients prescribed digoxin were shown to exhibit a statistically significant 48% increased risk of VT/VF (P < 0.001), 42% increased risk of the composite of VT/VF or death (P < 0.001), and a 37% increased risk of all-cause mortality (P = 0.006). Digoxin use was also associated with increased risk of appropriate ICD shocks (HR: 1.91; P < 0.001) and with increased burden of VT/VF events (HR: 1.46; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggests that digoxin use is associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmia and death in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients with an ICD.