Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 128
Filter
1.
Transpl Immunol ; 86: 102116, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39233095

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The scarcity of suitable donor organs has led to the inclusion of Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) kidneys to augment the donor pool, despite potential concerns regarding post-transplant outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the clinical outcomes of a cohort of 317 kidney transplant recipients from deceased donors at a single center between 2008 and 2018. Patients were categorized into ECD and Standard Criteria Donor (SCD) groups, with primary nonfunctioning grafts excluded. Comprehensive laboratory evaluations were conducted, including HLA typing and serum creatinine levels. Immunosuppressive regimens were standardized, and statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS program. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 83 (26.18%) patients who received kidney transplants from ECDs and 234 (73.82%) from SCDs. The ECD group showed a longer cold ischemia time (p = 0.019) and a higher rate of delayed graft function (DGF) compared with the SCD group. No significant differences were observed in graft survival (p = 0.370) or patient survival (p = 0.993) between the ECD and SCD groups. However, differences in graft survival were noted between the groups when stratified by DGF status: ECD with DGF vs. ECD without DGF (p = 0.029), ECD with DGF vs. SCD with DGF (p = 0.188), ECD with DGF vs. SCD without DGF (p = 0.022), ECD without DGF vs. SCD with DGF (p = 0.014), ECD without DGF vs. SCD without DGF (p = 0.340), and SCD with DGF vs. SCD without DGF (p = 0.195). No differences in patient survival rates were observed among these groups for all pairwise comparisons (p > 0.05) when stratified by donor criteria and DGF status. CONCLUSIONS: Graft and patient survival rates were comparable between ECD and SCD kidney transplant recipients.


Subject(s)
Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Humans , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Delayed Graft Function , Graft Rejection/mortality , Graft Rejection/immunology , Treatment Outcome , Donor Selection , Survival Rate
2.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0306056, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968266

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the current practices of selecting cold storage preservation solutions in Brazil and their impact on delayed graft function (DGF) incidence and 1-year outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 3,134 brain-dead deceased donor kidney transplants performed between 2014 and 2015 in 18 Brazilian centers. The most commonly used preservation solution was Euro-collins (EC, 55.4%), followed by Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK, 30%) and Institut Georges Lopez (IGL-1, 14.6%). The incidence of DGF was 54.4%, with 11.7% of patients requiring dialysis for more than 14 days, indicating prolonged DGF. Upon adjusting for confounding variables, HTK demonstrated a significantly lower risk of DGF than EC (OR 0.7350.82500.926), as did IGL-1 (OR 0.6050.7120.837). Similar protective effects were observed for prolonged DGF when comparing HTK (OR 0.4780.5990.749) and IGL-1 (OR 0.4780.6810.749) against EC. No significant association was found between preservation solutions and 1-year death-censored graft survival. In conclusion, EC was the most frequently used cold storage perfusion solution, demonstrating a higher incidence and duration of DGF compared with HTK and IGL-1, but with no impact on 1-year graft survival.


Subject(s)
Delayed Graft Function , Kidney Transplantation , Organ Preservation Solutions , Organ Preservation , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Humans , Brazil/epidemiology , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Organ Preservation/methods , Delayed Graft Function/epidemiology , Graft Survival/drug effects
3.
Transpl Int ; 37: 12750, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881801

ABSTRACT

Patients with end-stage heart disease who undergo a heart transplant frequently have simultaneous kidney insufficiency, therefore simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation is an option and it is necessary to understand its characteristics and long-term variables. The recipient characteristics and operative and long-term variables were assessed in a meta-analysis. A total of 781 studies were screened, and 33 were thoroughly reviewed. 15 retrospective cohort studies and 376 patients were included. The recipient's mean age was 51.1 years (95% CI 48.52-53.67) and 84% (95% CI 80-87) were male. 71% (95% CI 59-83) of the recipients were dialysis dependent. The most common indication was ischemic cardiomyopathy [47% (95% CI 41-53)] and cardiorenal syndrome [22% (95% CI 9-35)]. Also, 33% (95% CI 20-46) of the patients presented with delayed graft function. During the mean follow-up period of 67.49 months (95% CI 45.64-89.33), simultaneous rejection episodes of both organ allografts were described in 5 cases only. Overall survival was 95% (95% CI 88-100) at 30 days, 81% (95% CI 76-86) at 1 year, 79% (95% CI 71-87) at 3, and 71% (95% CI 59-83) at 5 years. Simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation is an important option for concurrent cardiac and renal dysfunction and has acceptable rejection and survival rates.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Heart Transplantation , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Cardio-Renal Syndrome/surgery , Delayed Graft Function , Retrospective Studies , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart Failure/mortality , Treatment Outcome
4.
Int Braz J Urol ; 50(4): 470-479, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743065

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The clinical outcomes of kidney transplantation from deceased donors have seen significant improvements with the use of machine perfusion (MP), now a standard practice in transplant centers. However, the use of perfusate biomarkers for assessing organ quality remains a subject of debate. Despite this, some centers incorporate them into their decision-making process for donor kidney acceptance. Recent studies have indicated that lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), glutathione S-transferase, interleukin-18, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) could predict post-transplant outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2016 and June 2017, 31 deceased-donor after brain death were included and stroke was the main cause of death. Pediatric patients, hypersensitized recipients were excluded. 43 kidneys were subjected to machine perfusion. Perfusate samples were collected just before the transplantation and stored at -80ºC. Kidney transplant recipients have an average age of 52 years, 34,9% female, with a BMI 24,6±3,7. We employed receiver operating characteristic analysis to investigate associations between these perfusate biomarkers and two key clinical outcomes: delayed graft function and primary non-function. RESULTS: The incidence of delayed graft function was 23.3% and primary non-function was 14%. A strong association was found between NGAL concentration and DGF (AUC=0.766, 95% CI, P=0.012), and between LDH concentration and PNF (AUC=0.84, 95% CI, P=0.027). Other perfusate biomarkers did not show significant correlations with these clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: The concentrations of NGAL and LDH during machine perfusion could assist transplant physicians in improving the allocation of donated organs and making challenging decisions regarding organ discarding. Further, larger-scale studies are required.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Delayed Graft Function , Kidney Transplantation , Lipocalin-2 , Organ Preservation , Perfusion , Humans , Female , Biomarkers/analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Perfusion/methods , Adult , Lipocalin-2/analysis , Organ Preservation/methods , Tissue Donors , ROC Curve , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , L-Lactate Dehydrogenase/analysis , Reference Values , Predictive Value of Tests
5.
Anesth Analg ; 139(1): 58-67, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578867

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of balanced crystalloids over normal saline for perioperative fluid management during kidney transplantation and its benefits on acid-base and electrolyte balance along with its influence on postoperative clinical outcomes remains a topic of controversy. Therefore, we conducted this review to assess the impact of balanced solutions compared to normal saline on outcomes for kidney transplant patients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing balanced lower-chloride solutions to normal saline in renal transplant patients. Our main outcome of interest was delayed graft function (DGF). Additionally, we examined acid-base and electrolyte measurements, along with postoperative renal function. We computed relative risk (RR) using the Mantel-Haenszel test for binary outcomes, and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, and applied DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models to address heterogeneity. Furthermore, we performed a trial sequential analysis (TSA) for all outcomes. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs comprising a total of 1668 patients were included; 832 (49.9%) were assigned to receive balanced solutions. Balanced crystalloids reduced the occurrence of DGF compared to normal saline, with RR of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.94), P = .005; I² = 0%. The occurrence was 25% (194 of 787) in the balanced crystalloids group and 34% (240 of 701) in the normal saline group. Moreover, our TSA supported the primary outcome result and suggests that the sample size was sufficient for our conclusion. End-of-surgery chloride (MD, -8.80 mEq·L -1 ; 95% CI, -13.98 to -3.63 mEq.L -1 ; P < .001), bicarbonate (MD, 2.12 mEq·L -1 ; 95% CI, 1.02-3.21 mEq·L -1 ; P < .001), pH (MD, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.04-0.07; P < .001), and base excess (BE) (MD, 2.41 mEq·L -1 ; 95% CI, 0.88-3.95 mEq·L -1 ; P = .002) significantly favored the balanced crystalloids groups and the end of surgery potassium (MD, -0.17 mEq·L -1 ; 95% CI, -0.36 to 0.02 mEq·L -1 ; P = .07) did not differ between groups. However, creatinine did not differ in the first (MD, -0.06 mg·dL -1 ; 95% CI, -0.38 to 0.26 mg·dL -1 ; P = .71) and seventh (MD, -0.06 mg·dL -1 ; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.06 mg·dL -1 ; P = .30) postoperative days nor urine output in the first (MD, -1.12 L; 95% CI, -3.67 to 1.43 L; P = .39) and seventh (MD, -0.01 L; 95% CI, -0.45 to 0.42 L; P = .95) postoperative days. CONCLUSIONS: Balanced lower-chloride solutions significantly reduce the occurrence of DGF and provide an improved acid-base and electrolyte control in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.


Subject(s)
Crystalloid Solutions , Fluid Therapy , Kidney Transplantation , Saline Solution , Humans , Crystalloid Solutions/administration & dosage , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Saline Solution/administration & dosage , Fluid Therapy/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Acid-Base Equilibrium/drug effects , Treatment Outcome , Delayed Graft Function/prevention & control , Delayed Graft Function/etiology , Isotonic Solutions/administration & dosage
6.
J Bras Nefrol ; 46(2): e20230014, 2024.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38284551

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Anemia is frequent in patients undergoing replacement therapy for kidney failure. Anemia in the pre- and post-transplantation period might be related to kidney transplant outcomes. The current study therefore sought to assess the relationship between anemia, delayed allograft function (DGF), chronic kidney allograft dysfunction (CAD), and death from any cause following kidney transplantation from a deceased donor. METHODS: This was a retrospective study with 206 kidney transplant patients of deceased donors. We analyzed deceased donors' and kidney transplant patients' demographic data. Moreover, we compared biochemical parameters, anemia status, and medicines between DGF and non-DGF groups. Afterward, we performed a multivariate analysis. We also evaluated outcomes, such as CAD within one year and death in ten years. RESULTS: We observed a lower frequency of pre-transplant hemoglobin concentration (Hb) but higher frequency of donor-serum creatinine and red blood transfusion within one week after transplantation in the group with DGF. In addition, there was an independent association between Hb concentration before transplantation and DGF [OR 0.252, 95%CI: 0.159-0.401; p < 0.001]. There was also an association between Hb concentration after six months of kidney transplantation and both CAD [OR 0.798, 95% CI: 0.687-0.926; p = 0.003] and death from any cause. CONCLUSION: An association was found between pre-transplantation anemia and DGF and between anemia six months after transplantation and both CAD and death by any cause. Thus, anemia before or after transplantation affects the outcomes for patients who have undergone kidney transplantation from a deceased donor.


Subject(s)
Anemia , Kidney Transplantation , Renal Insufficiency , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Delayed Graft Function/epidemiology , Delayed Graft Function/etiology , Graft Survival , Tissue Donors , Anemia/etiology , Renal Insufficiency/complications , Hemoglobins , Risk Factors
7.
Ann Transplant ; 28: e940522, 2023 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37525450

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND EPTS (Estimated Post-Transplant Survival), KDRI (Kidney Donor Risk Index), and KDPI (Kidney Donor Profile Index) were developed aiming to ameliorate donor-recipient longevity matching in kidney transplants. They are based on a prediction model made using the United States population; evidence of their use outside EEUU remains limited. The aim of this study was to describe the quality of deceased-donor kidneys and to determine recipient and graft survival, glomerular filtration rate, and incidence of delayed graft function in renal transplantation according to these indices in Cali, Colombia. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this historical cohort study, Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze survival of recipient and graft according to the values of the indices categorized by quintiles. Glomerular filtration rate and incidence of delayed graft function were also analyzed according to KDRI and KDPI. RESULTS We included 380 patients. Medians of EPTS, KDRI, and KDPI were 24% (IQR 9-60), 0.8 (IQR 0.71-0.99), and 27% (IQR 13-49), respectively. Two-year survival was 97.8% in recipients with EPTS ≤20% and it decreased with higher values of the index. Recipient and graft survival were lower for all periods when donors had KDPI >80%. Incidence of delayed graft function was higher in patients whose donors had KDPI ≥60% (44% vs 21%). Glomerular filtration rate decreased with the highest values of KDPI for all periods. CONCLUSIONS Our study represents the initial evaluation of the usefulness of these indices in Colombia. Our results suggest that KDRI, KDPI, and EPTS may serve as valuable tools for kidney allocation in our setting. Further research with larger sample sizes is necessary to validate these indices in our population.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Humans , United States , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Graft Survival , Delayed Graft Function/etiology , Cohort Studies , Colombia , Tissue Donors , Kidney , Retrospective Studies
8.
Braz. J. Anesth. (Impr.) ; 72(6): 711-719, Nov.-Dec. 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1420614

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background The influence of different crystalloid solutions infused during deceased-donor kidney transplant on the incidence of delayed graft function remains unclear. We investigated the influence of Plasma-Lyte® vs. 0.9% saline on the incidence of delayed graft function in deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients. Methods We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial of 104 patients aged 18 to 65 years who underwent deceased-donor kidney transplant under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Plasma-Lyte® (n = 52) or 0.9% saline (n = 52), at the same infusion volume, for intraoperative fluid replacement. The primary outcome was the occurrence of delayed graft function. Secondary outcomes included metabolic and electrolytic changes at the end of surgery. Results Two patients in the Plasma-Lyte® group and one in the 0.9% saline group died postoperatively and were not included for analysis. The incidence of delayed graft function in Plasma-Lyte® and 0.9% saline groups were 60.0% (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI 46.2-72.4]) and 74.5% (95% CI 61.1-84.4), respectively (p= 0.140). Mean (standard deviation) values of immediate postoperative pH and serum chloride levels in Plasma-Lyte® and 0.9% saline groups were 7.306 (0.071) and 7.273 (0.061) (p= 0.013), and 99.6 (4.2) mEq.L-1 and 103.3 (5.6) mEq.L-1, respectively (p< 0.001). All other postoperative metabolic and electrolyte variables were not statistically different at the immediate postoperative period (p> 0.05). Conclusion In deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients, the incidence of delayed graft function is not influenced by Plasma-Lyte® or 0.9% saline used for intraoperative fluid replacement.


Subject(s)
Humans , Kidney Transplantation , Saline Solution , Single-Blind Method , Electrolytes , Delayed Graft Function/prevention & control , Delayed Graft Function/epidemiology , Kidney/physiology
9.
Transpl Int ; 35: 10344, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35401043

ABSTRACT

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication of kidney transplantation and frequently leads to the necessity of surveillance biopsies. The purpose of this study is to describe the histological findings in surveillance biopsies of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients and evaluate the risk factors for graft outcomes. This is a monocentric, retrospective study including kidney transplant recipients that underwent a graft biopsy during the DGF period between January 2006 and July 2019. 356 biopsies were performed in 335 deceased donor transplant recipients. Biopsies were analyzed according to the Banff classification. The main histological findings were: acute tubular necrosis in 150 biopsies (42.1%), acute rejection in 96 biopsies (26.9%), and borderline findings in 91 biopsies (25.5%). In the multivariate analysis, recipient age (p = 0.028) and DGF duration (p = 0.005) were associated with rejection, antibody-induction with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was protective (p = 0.001). The occurrence of rejection was associated with lower death-censored graft survival (log-rank; p = 0.009). Surveillance biopsies of kidney grafts experiencing DGF remain an essential tool for the care of kidney transplant recipients. The recipient's age and duration of DGF are independent risk factors for acute rejection, while antibody-induction therapy with ATG is associated with protection from its occurrence.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Antibodies , Antilymphocyte Serum , Biopsy , Delayed Graft Function/epidemiology , Delayed Graft Function/etiology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
10.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 72(6): 711-719, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34563559

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The influence of different crystalloid solutions infused during deceased-donor kidney transplant on the incidence of delayed graft function remains unclear. We investigated the influence of Plasma-Lyte.½ vs. 0.9% saline on the incidence of delayed graft function in deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial of 104 patients aged 18 to 65 years who underwent deceased-donor kidney transplant under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Plasma-Lyte.½ (n.ß=.ß52) or 0.9% saline (n.ß=.ß52), at the same infusion volume, for intraoperative fluid replacement. The primary outcome was the occurrence of delayed graft function. Secondary outcomes included metabolic and electrolytic changes at the end of surgery. RESULTS: Two patients in the Plasma-Lyte.½ group and one in the 0.9% saline group died postoperatively and were not included for analysis. The incidence of delayed graft function in Plasma-Lyte.½ and 0.9% saline groups were 60.0% (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI 46.2...72.4]) and 74.5% (95% CI 61.1...84.4), respectively (p.ß=.ß0.140). Mean (standard deviation) values of immediate postoperative pH and serum chloride levels in Plasma-Lyte.½ and 0.9% saline groups were 7.306 (0.071) and 7.273 (0.061) (p.ß=.ß0.013), and 99.6 (4.2) mEq.L-1 and 103.3 (5.6) mEq.L-1, respectively (p.ß<.ß0.001). All other postoperative metabolic and electrolyte variables were not statistically different at the immediate postoperative period (p.ß>.ß0.05). CONCLUSION: In deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients, the incidence of delayed graft function is not influenced by Plasma-Lyte.½ or 0.9% saline used for intraoperative fluid replacement.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Saline Solution , Humans , Delayed Graft Function/epidemiology , Delayed Graft Function/prevention & control , Single-Blind Method , Electrolytes , Kidney/physiology
11.
J. bras. nefrol ; 43(3): 375-382, July-Sept. 2021. tab, graf
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1340131

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction: The number of kidney transplants (KTx) is increasing in Brazil and, consequently, the costs of this procedure increase the country's health budget. We retrospectively evaluated the data of kidney transplant procedures until hospital discharge, according to kidney function recovery after the procedure. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the non-sensitized, 1st KTx from deceased donors performed between Jan/2010 to Dec/2017. Results: Out of the 1300 KTx from deceased donors performed in this period, 730 patients were studied and divided into 3 groups: Immediate Renal Function (IRF) - decrease in serum creatinine ≥ 10% on two consecutive days; Delayed Graft Function (DGF) - decrease in serum creatinine <10% on two consecutive days, without the need for dialysis, and Dialysis (D) - need for dialysis during the first week. Patients in group D stayed longer in the hospital compared to DGF and IRF (21, 11 and 8 days respectively, p < 0.001). More D patients (21%) were admitted to the ICU and performed a greater number of laboratory tests (p < 0.001) and renal biopsies (p < 0.001), in addition to receiving a higher amount of immunosuppressants. Total hospital costs were higher in group D and DGF compared to IRF (U$ 7.021,48; U$ 3.603,42 and U$ 2.642,37 respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The costs of the transplant procedure is impacted by the recovery of kidney function after the transplant. The reimbursement for each of these different kidney function outcomes should be individualized in order to cover their real costs.


Resumo Introdução: O número de transplantes renais (KTx, do inglês kidney transplant) está aumentando no Brasil e, consequentemente, os custos deste procedimento aumentam o orçamento de saúde do país. Avaliamos retrospectivamente dados dos procedimentos de transplantes renais até a alta hospitalar, de acordo com a recuperação da função renal após o procedimento. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva dos 1º KTx de doadores falecidos, não sensibilizados, realizados entre Jan/2010 a Dez/2017. Resultados: Dos 1300 KTx de doadores falecidos realizados neste período, 730 pacientes foram estudados e divididos em 3 grupos: Função Renal Imediata (FRI) - diminuição na creatinina sérica ≥ 10% em dois dias consecutivos; Função Retardada do Enxerto (FRE) - diminuição na creatinina sérica <10% em dois dias consecutivos, sem necessidade de diálise, e Diálise (D) - necessidade de diálise durante a primeira semana. Pacientes no grupo D permaneceram mais tempo no hospital em comparação com FRE e FRI (21, 11 e 8 dias dias respectivamente, p < 0,001). Mais pacientes do grupo D (21%) foram admitidos na UTI e realizaram um maior número de testes laboratoriais (p < 0,001) e biópsias renais (p < 0,001), além de receberem uma quantidade maior de imunossupressores. Os custos hospitalares totais foram mais elevados nos grupos D e FRE em comparação com FRI (U$ 7.021,48; U$ 3.603,42 e U$ 2.642,37 respectivamente, p < 0,001). Conclusão: Os custos do procedimento de transplante são impactados pela recuperação da função renal após o transplante. O reembolso para cada um desses diferentes desfechos da função renal deve ser individualizado a fim de cobrir seus custos reais.


Subject(s)
Humans , Kidney Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Renal Dialysis , Delayed Graft Function , Graft Survival , Kidney/physiology
12.
Transplant Proc ; 53(5): 1470-1476, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34006380

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In kidney transplantation (KT), delayed graft function (DGF) is a significant early complication observed in the first week. The study aimed to investigate the impact of DGF on the outcome, allograft, and patient survival after KT with organs from deceased donors. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using 304 KT patients who received an organ from deceased donors from 2008 to 2018. The patients were divided into 2 groups, DGF positive (DGF+) and DGF negative (DGF-). The database containing the clinical, laboratory, and immunologic information of donors and recipients was statistically analyzed using the SSPS program. RESULTS: In this study, 189 (62.17%) were DGF+ and 115 (37.83%) were DGF-. Until 6 months after KT, the estimate glomerular filtration rate was better in group DGF-, but it was similar between the groups during 10-year follow-up. Graft losses were higher in DGF+ group than in the DGF- (P = .046). The serum creatinine level was persistently higher in DGF+ group until the sixth month (P ≤ .05). Allograft survival rates were better in patients who were DGF- (P = .033). Those who had DGF for more than 15 days had a worse graft survival (P = .003), but in 10 year follow-up, patient survival rates were similar (P = .705). CONCLUSION: DGF+ patients were associated with dialysis time before KT, ischemia time, and the donors' clinical status, such as age, organ quality, and serum creatinine. All these factors had a great impact on graft survival but not on patient survival.


Subject(s)
Delayed Graft Function/mortality , Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Adult , Allografts/physiopathology , Creatinine/blood , Delayed Graft Function/etiology , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Kidney/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Tissue Donors/statistics & numerical data , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome
13.
J Bras Nefrol ; 43(3): 375-382, 2021.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33899907

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The number of kidney transplants (KTx) is increasing in Brazil and, consequently, the costs of this procedure increase the country's health budget. We retrospectively evaluated the data of kidney transplant procedures until hospital discharge, according to kidney function recovery after the procedure. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the non-sensitized, 1st KTx from deceased donors performed between Jan/2010 to Dec/2017. RESULTS: Out of the 1300 KTx from deceased donors performed in this period, 730 patients were studied and divided into 3 groups: Immediate Renal Function (IRF) - decrease in serum creatinine ≥ 10% on two consecutive days; Delayed Graft Function (DGF) - decrease in serum creatinine <10% on two consecutive days, without the need for dialysis, and Dialysis (D) - need for dialysis during the first week. Patients in group D stayed longer in the hospital compared to DGF and IRF (21, 11 and 8 days respectively, p < 0.001). More D patients (21%) were admitted to the ICU and performed a greater number of laboratory tests (p < 0.001) and renal biopsies (p < 0.001), in addition to receiving a higher amount of immunosuppressants. Total hospital costs were higher in group D and DGF compared to IRF (U$ 7.021,48; U$ 3.603,42 and U$ 2.642,37 respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The costs of the transplant procedure is impacted by the recovery of kidney function after the transplant. The reimbursement for each of these different kidney function outcomes should be individualized in order to cover their real costs.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Delayed Graft Function , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney/physiology , Renal Dialysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tissue Donors
14.
Transpl Int ; 34(6): 1093-1104, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742470

ABSTRACT

This retrospective multicenter (n = 18) cohort study evaluated the incidence, risk factors, and the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on 1-year kidney transplant (KT) outcomes. Of 3992 deceased donor KT performed in 2014-2015, the incidence of DGF was 54%, ranging from 29.9% to 87.7% among centers. Risk factors (lower-bound-95%CI OR upper-bound-95%CI ) were male gender (1.066 1.2491.463 ), diabetic kidney disease (1.053 1.2961.595 ), time on dialysis (1.005 1.0071.009 ), retransplantation (1.035 1.3971.885 ), preformed anti-HLA antibodies (1.011 1.3831.892 ), HLA mismatches (1.006 1.0661.130 ), donor age (1.011 1.0171.023 ), donor final serum creatinine (sCr) (1.239 1.3171.399 ), cold ischemia time (CIT) (1.031 1.0431.056 ), machine perfusion (0.401 0.5420.733 ), and induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) (0.658 0.8000.973 ). Duration of DGF > 4 days was associated with inferior renal function and DGF > 14 days with the higher incidences of acute rejection, graft loss, and death. In conclusion, the incidence and duration of DGF were high and associated with inferior graft outcomes. While late referral and poor donor maintenance account for the high overall incidence of DGF, variability in donor and recipient selection, organ preservation method, and type of induction agent may account for the wide variation observed among transplant centers.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Brazil/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Delayed Graft Function/epidemiology , Delayed Graft Function/etiology , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Survival , Humans , Incidence , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tissue Donors
15.
Ann Transplant ; 25: e927010, 2020 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33318465

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND The present study analyzed the impact of hypothermic pulsatile machine perfusion (MP) following a long period of static cold (SC) storage in the peculiar Brazilian scenario of high incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), despite good donor characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis, with a 1-year follow-up, of 206 recipients of donor-matched paired kidneys was performed. Of the 206 donor kidneys, 103 were maintained exclusively in static cold storage (SC group) and 103 were kept on machine perfusion after a period of SC preservation (MP group). All donors were brain dead. RESULTS Only 4.9% of the kidneys were from expanded-criteria donors. Static cold ischemia time (CIT) in the SC group was 20.8±4.1 hours vs. 15.8±6.2 hours in the MP group (P<0.001). Dynamic CIT in the MP group was 12.3±5.7 hours. MP significantly reduced DGF incidence (29.1% vs. 55.3%, P<0.001), and this effect was confirmed in multivariable analysis (OR, 1.115; 95% CI, 1.033-1.204, P=0.001). No differences were observed between the groups with regard to DGF duration, length of hospital stay, incidence of primary nonfunction and acute rejection, graft loss, death, or renal function. CONCLUSIONS In this Brazilian setting, MP following a long period of SC preservation was associated with reduced DGF incidence in comparison with SC storage without MP.


Subject(s)
Delayed Graft Function , Kidney Transplantation , Organ Preservation , Adult , Brazil , Delayed Graft Function/epidemiology , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Incidence , Kidney , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Preservation/methods , Perfusion , Retrospective Studies , Tissue Donors , Young Adult
16.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 18(4): 436-443, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32552628

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the influence of the interaction between donor age and cold ischemia time on allograft survival in the absence of delayed graft function, early acute rejection, or the combination of both. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients first transplanted with living-related and deceased-donor allografts between 2001 and 2016. Predictors included cold ischemia time, donor and recipient age and sex, body mass index, renal replacement therapy duration, cause of end-stage renal disease, HLA class I and II mismatches, panel of reactive antibodies score, donor creatinine concentration, development of delayed graft function, and biopsy-proven acute rejection. The response variable was time until return to renal replacement therapy. Patients who died with functioning allografts were censored at the time of death. Analyses included multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The study included 498 patients followed for median of 4.1 years with median cold ischemia time of 17.0 hours. On multivariate analysis, allograft survival was negatively affected by the cold ischemia time-donor age interaction (P = .026), acute rejection (P = .043), delayed graft function (P = .001), and acute rejection combined with delayed graft function (P = .002). Restricted mean allograft survival times in patients who developed neither delayed graft function nor acute rejection decreased from 13.6 to 8.6 years when cold ischemia time increased from 12 to 36 hours and donor age increased from 30 to 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: Allograft survival was negatively affected by donor age-cold ischemia time interaction independently of the development of delayed graft function, acute rejection, or their combination.


Subject(s)
Cold Ischemia/adverse effects , Delayed Graft Function/etiology , Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Tissue Donors , Adult , Age Factors , Delayed Graft Function/diagnosis , Donor Selection , Female , Graft Rejection/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
17.
Notas enferm. (Córdoba) ; 20(35): 5-12, jun. 2020. graf.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing, BINACIS, UNISALUD | ID: biblio-1119029

ABSTRACT

Esta investigación tuvo por objetivo describir las características de los pacientes trasplantados renales con retraso en la función del injerto. Estudio descriptivo, transversal y observacional. Población: trasplantados renales asistidos en el Instituto de Cardiología de Corrientes entre 2016 y 2018 que cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Se utilizó formulario de elaboración propia; los datos se obtuvieron de revisión de historias clínicas. La información recolectada se analizó mediante programa informático Epidat_4.2. Se contó con el aval del comité de la institución. Se estudiaron 61 pacientes trasplantados; 43% pertenecía a donantes vivos y 57% a cadavéricos. El 66% de donantes cadavéricos tuvo retraso de la función del injerto, los de donantes vivos no lo presentaron. En cuanto al sexo 48% de los varones presentaron retraso en la función; en las mujeres fue el 28%. En edad de los pacientes, la media fue de 40,6 años ± 15,7; se observó mayor frecuencia de retrasos de la función en el grupo etario de 31 a 50 años con 44%. En cuanto al estado nutricional 17% que se encontraba con sobrepeso y 48% con bajo peso presentaron retraso de la función del injerto. Según los años en diálisis pre trasplante el 65% de aquellos con 4 a 7 años de diálisis presentaron retraso en la función del injerto. Según tiempo de isquemia fría del órgano trasplantado, 52% presentó retraso en la función del injerto cuando el tiempo fue mayor a 15 horas. En requerimiento de diálisis pos-operatorio, el 66% presentó retraso en la función del injerto y pertenecían a donantes cadavéricos. En índice de resistencia vascular renal en las primeras 24hs, el 65% con retraso de la función del injerto presentó índice patológico. En conclusión, sexo masculino, grupo etario de 31 a 50 años, tener alterado el estado nutricional, haberse dializado pre trasplante entre 4 a 7 años, padecer un tiempo prolongado de isquemia fría > 15 horas y presentar un índice de resistencia vascular renal patológico, son características presentes; en trasplantados renales con retraso en la función del injerto; y requieren ser tenidos en cuenta cuando se planean estas cirugías[AU]


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Nutritional Status , Renal Dialysis , Kidney Transplantation , Delayed Graft Function/physiopathology , Cold Ischemia
18.
Transplant Proc ; 52(5): 1272-1278, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32245622

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recurrent glomerulopathy (GP) after kidney transplantation is a complication of kidney transplantation that could negatively affect kidney function and graft survival. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome, graft survival, and GP recurrence and its predictive factors in kidney-transplanted patients. METHODS: Patients were divided into 2 groups: G1 (with GP; n = 95) and G2 (with other causes of end-stage renal disease; n = 373). Graft survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier for living donor (LD) and deceased donor (DD). Cox proportional hazards regression were used to investigate the predictors for graft loss and for GP recurrence. RESULTS: Disease recurrence was observed in 9 patients who received a kidney from an LD, of which 4 lost their grafts. In patients who received a kidney from a DD, recurrence was also observed in 9 patients, of which 3 lost their grafts. No statistically significant differences in graft survival between G1 and G2 in relation to LD and DD were noted (P = .299 and .434, respectively). However, differences in graft survival were found when GP subtypes and GP recurrence were analyzed. The predictors of graft loss were delayed graft function (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.226, P = .002), rejection episodes (HR = 1.904, P = .017), and recurrence or transplant GP (HR = 3.243, P = .006). The predictors of disease recurrence or transplant GP were age (HR = 0.945, P = .028) and cold ischemia time (HR = 1.117, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Kidney transplantation could be a reasonable treatment for GP with end-stage renal disease. Despite the disease recurrence, which is a significant cause of graft loss in transplant recipients, graft survival remains satisfactory.


Subject(s)
Cold Ischemia/adverse effects , Delayed Graft Function/epidemiology , Graft Survival , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Adult , Delayed Graft Function/pathology , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney/pathology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/pathology , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Proportional Hazards Models , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Transplants/pathology , Treatment Outcome
19.
Transplant Proc ; 52(5): 1269-1271, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32204899

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Longer cold ischemia time (CIT) is a deleterious factor for kidney transplant (KTx) outcomes and may lead Tx teams to graft discard. Because the CIT in Brazil is overall very high, the objective of this study was to compare outcomes among mate recipients of KTx with distinct CIT. METHODS: We studied 106 mate recipients of KTx in a single center followed for 1-year post-Tx. Mate kidneys were analyzed comparing the first and the second recipient to be transplanted. In a second analysis, we grouped mate recipients according to the CIT: ≤ 20 hours, > 20 hours, and mixed CIT. RESULTS: Seventy percent were standard criteria donors, with a mean Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of 61.5 ± 28%. KTx recipients presented an overall delayed graft function (DGF) rate of 82%, lasting 12 ± 7 days. The analysis of pairs considering the first and second recipient to be transplanted resulted in a longer CIT for the second (23.6 h vs 27 h; P = .001), and we did not find differences of outcomes after 1-year follow-up. Comparing pairs according to CIT (> 20h and ≤ 20h), DGF was higher in the CIT group > 20 hours (87.5% vs 58%; P = .002), with no differences of outcomes in 1-year follow-up. The logistic regression analysis shows that CIT > 20 hours is a risk factor for DGF in our study. CONCLUSION: CIT > 20 hours is a risk factor for DGF, therefore strategies to reduce the CIT are always necessary.


Subject(s)
Cold Ischemia/adverse effects , Delayed Graft Function/epidemiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Time Factors , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Delayed Graft Function/etiology , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Tissue Donors/statistics & numerical data
20.
Transplant Proc ; 52(4): 1147-1151, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32197869

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Renal transplantation (RT) has evolved to improve its functionality. Some factors have been little studied, one of which is hyperuricemia and its impact on renal graft function. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of complications of renal transplantation and its influence on hyperuricemia values in the first year of evolution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors completed a retrospective, observational study of 2 RT units in Mexico from January 2013 to December 2017. In total, 1009 files met the inclusion criteria; the levels of uric acid (UA) and creatinine (Cr) were determined before transplantation and in months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 after transplantation. Descriptive analysis was performed with measures of central tendency, measures of dispersion, difference of means with Student t test, and SPSS version 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, United States). RESULTS: The mean pretransplant UA was 6.24 mg/dL (standard deviation [SD] 1.97); per month was 4.73 mg/dL (SD 1.49). There is a difference in means between categorized groups of UA in the 5 post-RT moments (1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months). A positive correlation of 0.41 to 0.47 was found with Spearman's test. The delayed function of the graft influenced in the first month after transplant in presenting hyperuricemia and acute dysfunction in month 6 showed that the rejection had no significance at any time. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between the values of UA and Cr in the RT represents a moderate positive correlation; delayed graft function in the first month impacts the presence of hyperuricemia, as well as acute dysfunction at month 6 after transplantation.


Subject(s)
Delayed Graft Function/epidemiology , Delayed Graft Function/etiology , Hyperuricemia/epidemiology , Hyperuricemia/etiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Creatinine/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Mexico , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Uric Acid/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL