Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 570
1.
Skin Res Technol ; 30(6): e13764, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38853456

Injectable fillers, pivotal in aesthetic medicine, have evolved significantly with recent trends favoring biostimulators like calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA-CMC; Radiesse, Merz Aesthetics, Raleigh, NC) and poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA; Sculptra Aesthetics, Galderma, Dallas, TX). This study aims to compare the particle morphology of these two injectables and examine its potential clinical implications. Utilizing advanced light and scanning electron microscopy techniques, the physical characteristics of CaHA-CMC and PLLA particles were analyzed, including shape, size, circularity, roundness, aspect ratio, and quantity of phagocytosable particles. The findings reveal several morphological contrasts: CaHA-CMC particles exhibited a smooth, homogenous, spherical morphology with diameters predominantly ranging between 20 and 45 µm, while PLLA particles varied considerably in shape and size, appearing as micro flakes ranging from 2 to 150 µm in major axis length. The circularity and roundness of CaHA-CMC particles were significantly higher compared to PLLA, indicating a more uniform shape. Aspect ratio analysis further underscored these differences, with CaHA-CMC particles showing a closer resemblance to circles, unlike the more oblong PLLA particles. Quantification of the phagocytosable content of both injectables revealed a higher percentage of phagocytosable particles in PLLA. These morphological distinctions may influence the tissue response to each treatment. CaHA-CMC's uniform, spherical particles may result in reduced inflammatory cell recruitment, whereas PLLA's heterogeneous particle morphology may evoke a more pronounced inflammatory response.


Dermal Fillers , Durapatite , Polyesters , Durapatite/chemistry , Polyesters/chemistry , Dermal Fillers/chemistry , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Humans , Cosmetic Techniques , Particle Size , Biocompatible Materials/chemistry , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
2.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1394530, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881903

Objective: Injectable skin fillers offer a wider range of options for cutaneous anti-aging and facial rejuvenation. PLLA microspheres are increasingly favored as degradable and long-lasting fillers. The present study focused solely on the effect of PLLA on dermal collagen, without investigating its impact on the epidermis. In this study, we investigated the effects of PLLA microspheres on epidermal stem cells (EpiSCs). Methods: Different concentrations of PLLA microspheres on epidermal stem cells (EpiSCs) in vitro through culture, and identification of primary rat EpiSCs. CCK-8 detection, apoptosis staining, flow cytometry, Transwell assay, wound healing assay, q-PCR analysis, and immunofluorescence staining were used to detect the effects of PLLA on EpiSCs. Furthermore, we observed the effect on the epidermis by injecting PLLA into the dermis of the rat skin in vivo. Results: PLLA microspheres promote cell proliferation and migration while delaying cell senescence and maintaining its stemness. In vitro, Intradermal injection of PLLA microspheres in the rat back skin resulted in delayed aging, as evidenced by histological and immunohistochemical staining of the skin at 2, 4, and 12 weeks of follow-up. Conclusion: This study showed the positive effects of PLLA on rat epidermis and EpiSCs, while providing novel insights into the anti-aging mechanism of PLLA.


Cellular Senescence , Microspheres , Polyesters , Skin Aging , Animals , Rats , Cellular Senescence/drug effects , Skin Aging/drug effects , Stem Cells/metabolism , Stem Cells/cytology , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Epidermal Cells/metabolism , Cells, Cultured , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Epidermis/metabolism , Epidermis/drug effects , Cell Movement/drug effects , Dermal Fillers/pharmacology , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage
3.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0305580, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38870257

People naturally exhibit a self-serving bias which can be observed in their tendency to judge their own physical attractiveness more favourably than that of others. Despite this positive self-perception, minimally invasive cosmetic injectable procedures for facial rejuvenation and enhancement are becoming increasingly common. It remains unclear, however, whether recognizing an altered version of one's own face, enhanced cosmetically, correlates with a positive view of cosmetic surgery and excessive preoccupations about physical characteristics perceived as defects (body dysmorphic concerns). In this study, 30 healthy female participants, aged 18-24 years (Mage = 21.1 years, SD = 1.6), engaged in a face recognition task during which their faces were digitally morphed with that of gender-matched unfamiliar women who had undergone cosmetic enhancements, specifically lip and cheek fillers. The duration of exposure to these modified faces varied with short (500 msec) and long (2000 msec) viewing periods. Participants were asked to identify whether the digital morphs represented themselves or the other woman. Self-reports regarding acceptance of cosmetic surgery and dysmorphic concerns were collected. Participants PSE indicated a tendency towards self-bias under short presentation times, shifting towards the other as presentation times lengthened. Interestingly, this effect was associated with greater acceptance of cosmetic surgery and higher body dysmorphic concerns. This study underscores the importance of understanding how perceptions of others' physical appearances can influence self-recognition and attitudes towards cosmetic surgery, which may have both positive and potentially harmful implications.


Self Concept , Humans , Female , Young Adult , Adolescent , Cosmetic Techniques/psychology , Face , Cosmetics , Adult , Facial Recognition , Body Image/psychology , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage
8.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(4): 1089-1091, 2024 Jun 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709042

BACKGROUND: This study explores the dynamic changes in plastic surgery practices, focusing on the growth rates across different subcategories, particularly highlighting the trends in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To analyze evolving trends in plastic surgery using statistical methods, providing insights into the changes and growth patterns in various segments over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Utilizing data from 2005 to 2019 from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the authors, conducted a comprehensive statistical analysis using the SPSS program to investigate trends in plastic surgery procedures. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed no significant differences in year-on-year growth rates between cosmetic and reconstructive surgery. However, in reconstructive surgery subcategories, maxillofacial surgery showed the highest mean growth rate at 11.61%, though this was not statistically significant. In cosmetic minimally invasive procedures, soft tissue filler injections and botulinum toxin A injections experienced notably higher growth trends compared with microdermabrasion. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that practitioners considering a career in plastic surgery should not focus solely on choosing between reconstructive and cosmetic surgery. Recognizing substantial growth in cosmetic minimally invasive procedures, especially botulinum toxin A injections and fillers, is vital for making informed career decisions.


Cosmetic Techniques , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Surgery, Plastic , Humans , United States , Plastic Surgery Procedures/trends , Cosmetic Techniques/trends , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/trends , Surgery, Plastic/trends , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/administration & dosage , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Societies, Medical
9.
Niger J Clin Pract ; 27(4): 528-533, 2024 Apr 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679777

BACKGROUND: Dermal fillers augment soft tissues by replacing lost volume in the skin or subcutaneous fat. Dentists and other professionals utilize or recommend facial fillers for cosmetic and therapeutic purposes. AIMS: This study aims to investigate public awareness regarding using nonsurgical facial dermal fillers in Saudi Arabia. METHODS AND MATERIAL: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online self-administered questionnaire distributed to a total of 400 males and females through social media platforms. The participants reside in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. Descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test were employed for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 256 participants completed the survey, including 204 females and 51 males, with a mean age of 33.86 (SD = 10.5) years. Among the participants, 88 (34.4%) reported using facial fillers. Among them, only 46 (18%) were frequent consumers. Knowledge regarding correctly using facial fillers was generally high, especially for the lips (240, 94%), chin augmentation (203, 79.3%), and face lifting (226, 88.3%). However, participants' knowledge needed improvement in other areas. Most participants were aware of the side effects, except for visual impairment (83, 32.4%) and blockage of the vessels (128, 50%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlighted a remarkable level of knowledge among participants regarding the uses of fillers. However, participants demonstrated low awareness of all possible side effects associated with the treatment. Participants had valid reasons for undergoing facial treatments. However, constraints preventing them from pursuing fillers included fear of unexpected results and financial limitations.


Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Saudi Arabia , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Adult , Cosmetic Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Face
10.
Open Vet J ; 14(3): 840-845, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682143

Background: Dermal cosmetic fillers have been commonly used in camels in the last few years in Gulf countries. Aim: This study aimed to describe the radiographic as well as sonographic findings of injected cosmetic fillers in Arabian camel perinasal region in beauty shows. Methods: A total number of (n = 11,626) Arabian camels (Camelus dromedarius) were thoroughly investigated for injection of cosmetic fillers in the perinasal area. The age of the camels was 6 months to 10 years, and their weights were 400-650 kg. In parallel, a control group consisting of 30 age/weight-matched non-injected camels was used. Of the 11,626 examined camels, 25 animals (0.0.002%) were injected with cosmetic fillers in the perinasal region. Of the 25 camels, 19 (76%) were females and 6 (24%) were males. Radiographic examinations were carried out for the 25 injected camel perinasal regions. Results: Ultrasonographic examination of the injected perinasal regions revealed precise discrimination of the filler material, which appeared hypo-echogenic in 17 camels (68%) and with anechoic spots in the remaining 8 camels (32%). Variable degrees of swelling caused by the injection of moderate and large quantities of fillers were noted by radiographic assessment, the injected cosmetic filler was precisely diagnosed in the perinasal region as grey in color having soft tissue density in obtained radiographs. Conclusion: In conclusion, radiographic and ultrasonographic examinations are reliable, accurate, and non-invasive diagnostic imaging techniques that can precisely discriminate a filler agent in the soft tissues and determine the situ and size of cutaneous deposits in dromedary camels (C. dromedarius).


Camelus , Ultrasonography , Animals , Female , Ultrasonography/veterinary , Male , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Radiography/veterinary , Cosmetics/administration & dosage
11.
Int J Biol Macromol ; 268(Pt 2): 131880, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677707

Injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogels have been popularized in facial aesthetics as they provide a long-lasting effect, low risk of complications, allergenicity tests are not required before application and can be easily removed by the action of hyaluronidases. On the other hand, the development of these systems requires in-depth studies of chemical mechanisms involved in hydrogel formation. Ideal dermal fillers should temporarily fluidize during extrusion through the needle and quickly recover their original shape after application. Hydrogels with more elastic properties, for example, are difficult to inject while viscous materials are too liquid. A balance between both properties should be achieved. Each region of the face requires products with distinct rheological properties. High G' dermal fillers are preferable for deeper wrinkles whereas the counterpart with lower values of G' is more indicated in superficial wrinkles or lip augmentation. Factors such as molecular weight and concentration of HA, pH, type and concentration of the crosslinking agent, particle size, crosslinking reaction time and crosslinking agent/polysaccharide ratio should be modulated to achieve specific rheological properties. In this review, the effect of each variable is discussed in detail to guide the rational development of new dermal fillers.


Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Hydrogels , Rheology , Hyaluronic Acid/chemistry , Hydrogels/chemistry , Dermal Fillers/chemistry , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Humans , Face , Injections
12.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(7): 2392-2400, 2024 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566435

BACKGROUND: The signs of aging seem to be more visible on the neck compared to other locations, especially if a patient has already gone through facial rejuvenation procedures. Treatment of the aging neck imposes a challenge to the clinician, since one single approach is usually not enough to achieve the desired result, requiring multiple injections and sessions, which apart from being painful for the patients, is time-consuming for the clinician. AIM: To describe the use of calcium hydroxyapatite, incobotulinum toxin type A and Cohesive poly-densified matrix hyaluronic acid diluted in the same syringe and injected in the same session for neck rejuvenation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen women, older than 18 years, with cervical skin flaccidity grade 1-4 in a previously validated 5-point rating scale (Dermatologic Surg, 2016; 42, S94), who sought neck rejuvenation were injected in this pilot study with a single session with a combined hybrid mixture of calcium hydroxyapatite, incobotulinum toxin type A, and Cohesive poly-densified matrix hyaluronic acid and followed up for 90-180 days. RESULTS: At the 4-month post injection evaluation, 93.3% of the patients presented at least 1-grade improvement in the 5-point scale as evaluated by the investigator. No serious adverse events were reported, being most mild and transient in nature. CONCLUSION: CaHA, incoBonTA, and CPM-HA have complementary mechanisms of action and may be injected from the same syringe in the same session, boosting the final outcome, with high patient satisfaction, and ease of process for both patients and clinicians.


Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Cosmetic Techniques , Durapatite , Hyaluronic Acid , Neck , Rejuvenation , Skin Aging , Humans , Female , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/administration & dosage , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/adverse effects , Skin Aging/drug effects , Durapatite/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Adult , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Patient Satisfaction , Aged
13.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 46(5): 615-624, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38480594

Hollow temples are not typically considered aesthetically pleasing, and hollowness worsens with the aging process. When filling this region with fillers, there are several anatomical considerations, with injection techniques varying depending on the layer targeted. Specifically, injections between the superficial temporal fascia and the superficial layer of the deep temporal fascia are performed using a cannula, while periosteal layer injections involve the use of a needle to reach the bone before inserting fillers. Detailed anatomical insights encompass the boundaries of the temporal fossa and cautionary notes regarding blood vessels, supported by specific studies on veins and arteries in the temporal region. Complications, including vessel injuries, are discussed alongside an exploration of various injection techniques. This review provides a comprehensive exploration of anatomical considerations and the specific methodologies employed in temple augmentation with fillers.


Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Humans , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Injections , Temporal Bone/anatomy & histology
14.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(6): 1992-2000, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429946

BACKGROUND: Acne scar is an inflammatory condition, which commonly occurs in patients with acne vulgaris, especially in adults. Mesogels have been reported effective in improving atrophic acne scars. AIMS: We investigated the efficacy of adding Profhilo (a hyaluronic acid-based filler) to subcision as a new treatment method. METHODS: Twelve patients aged 18-45 years with atrophic acne scars on both sides of the face participated in this single-blinded, split-face, randomized controlled trial. Each side of the face was randomly assigned to one of the treatment methods, including subcision alone and subcision + Profhilo. Patients in the Profhilo arm received mesogel (1 cc) in addition to the subcision procedure. Both methods were carried out two times at 1-month intervals. Assessments were done based on the sonographic depth of scars, and two blinded observers examined photographs at baseline and 3 months after the final session and the results were reported based on an exclusively made formula as the total score. The Global Improvement Scale and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (for patient satisfaction) were also used. RESULTS: The VAS score of patient satisfaction was statistically significant in the Profhilo arm, with a mean improvement of 528.08 and 219.06 in the subcision arm (p = 0.02). No significant difference was seen in total acne scar reduction comparing the two methods (29.74 in the Profhilo arm and 22.27 in the subcision arm, p = 0.56). Sonographic depth reduction was also non-significant, with a mean of 29.21 in the Profhilo arm and 28.53 in the subcision arm (p = 0.4). The mean global improvement was reported as four in both arms, and no statistical significance was observed (p = 0.89). The best response to treatment belonged to the rolling subtype in both methods (p = 0.029 for the Profhilo arm and p = 0.001 for the subcision arm). CONCLUSION: Despite no significant difference between the methods, Profhilo is more effective due to a higher satisfaction rate and better physiologic effects.


Acne Vulgaris , Cicatrix , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Acne Vulgaris/complications , Single-Blind Method , Adult , Cicatrix/etiology , Cicatrix/therapy , Female , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Male , Treatment Outcome , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Adolescent , Middle Aged , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Face , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Cosmetic Techniques/instrumentation
15.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(6): 1969-1972, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38450900

BACKGROUND: The intricate mechanisms of jowl formation, which ultimately lead to loss of lower jaw definition, skin laxity, and localized fat accumulation, involve interrelated factors such as skin aging, fat redistribution, muscle dynamics, and loss of support. AIMS: To propose a structured approach to the treatment of the jowl area that is comprehensive and tailored to the needs of each individual patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This integrative review combines a meticulous analysis of the literature with practical insights from real-world clinical settings. The authors draw on their extensive clinical experience to bridge research findings with practical clinical perspectives. RESULTS: This study presents a guideline for addressing jowl formation that starts with the major aging processes and, based on simple diagnostic questions, suggests minimally invasive interventions, including collagen stimulators, energy-based devices, lipolytic injectables, polydioxanone threads, and hyaluronic acid fillers. DISCUSSION: The guideline emphasizes the significance of personalized treatments while also acknowledging the need for comprehensive evaluation and recognizing the ever-evolving nature of aesthetic interventions in jowl management. CONCLUSION: This systematic approach can not only simplify diagnostic and treatment decisions for dermatologists but also enhance patient satisfaction by customizing treatment plans based on individual characteristics and expectations.


Cosmetic Techniques , Rejuvenation , Skin Aging , Humans , Skin Aging/drug effects , Cosmetic Techniques/standards , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Patient Satisfaction
17.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(6): 1985-1991, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38487954

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA) filler treatment is a minimally-invasive alternative to surgery to volumize the cheeks. HAVOL (Restylane® Volyme) is a flexible HA filler suited to contouring and volumizing the midface. METHODS: This randomized, evaluator-blinded, no-treatment controlled study evaluated effectiveness and safety of HAVOL for correction of midface volume deficit and midface contour deficiency in Chinese subjects. In total 111 subjects were randomized to HAVOL and 37 to no treatment (control). The primary endpoint was response, on the blinded evaluator-assessed Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS), at 6 months after last injection for the treatment group and 6 months after randomization for controls, where response was defined as ≥1-point improvement from baseline on both sides of the face. RESULTS: HAVOL was superior to no treatment at 6 months, meeting the primary objective: 76% versus 8% MMVS responders, a difference of 68% (CI: 55.7%-79.4%, p < 0.0001). These effects were sustained in 51% at 12 months after last injection. A majority (≥96%) had improved aesthetic appearance of midface fullness at Month 1 (using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale [GAIS]), effects which remained in ≥80% up to 12 months. Volume change captured by 3D photography increased after 1 month to 3.6 mL (close to the total injected volume of 3.4 mL), and remained stable through 12 months. Over 97% reported satisfaction with results after treatment with HAVOL. Additionally, HAVOL was well tolerated, with no unanticipated related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that HAVOL is effective and well tolerated for midface treatment in a Chinese population.


Asian People , Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Face , Hyaluronic Acid , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Hyaluronic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Female , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Adult , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Male , Treatment Outcome , Esthetics , Patient Satisfaction , Single-Blind Method , China
19.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(7): NP476-NP485, 2024 Jun 14.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38489829

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing popularity, the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers for the correction of dark under-eye shadows remains challenging. Specific guidance on patient assessment is limited. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a stepwise assessment framework for lower eyelid dark shadows to help practitioners classify patients based on their underlying problems and facilitate a more strategic approach to treatment. METHODS: Literature review and peer collaboration informed the current availability of educational material for use by experienced injectors when assessing patients presenting with dark circles. A practitioner survey provided insight into current practices. A focus group convened to review the survey results and discuss best practice approaches to patient assessment. RESULTS: Surveyed practitioners (n = 39) reported patient concern about under-eye hollows (91%), dark eye circles (80%), and looking tired (60%). All (100%) agreed that midcheek volume was critical when treating tear-trough depression, and only 26% reported use of a tear-trough classification system. The focus group developed a framework for assessing tear-trough depression and the lid-cheek junction in patients presenting with dark circles. Key factors within this framework included the importance of appropriate lighting when conducting a visual inspection, regional inspection of the cheek and tear trough, palpation of the orbital rim and soft tissues, determination of the orbital vector, and assessment of lower eyelid pigmentation and skin quality. CONCLUSIONS: Careful step-by-step assessment can reduce the challenges of treating dark circles by identifying patients in whom dark eye circles may be improved without the need to directly inject filler into the tear trough.


Cheek , Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Eyelids , Hyaluronic Acid , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Focus Groups , Skin Aging
20.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(7): 2368-2372, 2024 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38500251

BACKGROUND: The chin is an essential element of the facial unit and influences how people perceive facial aesthetic appeal. Hyaluronic acid (HA) gel injections are tried-and-true therapies for regenerative therapies with a record of success in efficacy and safety. AIMS: To determine the best type of concentration of HA and way of injection for deep and superficial planes of chin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VYC-20L and VYC-25L (Juvederm Voluma XC® Juvéderm Volux®; Allergan plc) are 20- and 25-mg/mL HA gels with lidocaine, respectively, were injected with cannulas and needles on the bone, respectively. RESULTS: Chin reinforced respecting the measures with good contouring. No serious complications. Patient was satisfied with results. DISCUSSION: We advise using VYC 20L superficially above the muscle or with a cannula for injection, and we recommend using VYC 25L in the supraperiosteal plane.


Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Patient Satisfaction , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Humans , Chin , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Female , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Cannula , Middle Aged , Esthetics , Adult , Injections , Injections, Subcutaneous , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage
...