Disease severity, treatment patterns, and quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis routinely managed with systemic treatment: results of the CRYSTAL observational study in Central and Eastern European countries.

Psoriasis is a common, life-long skin disease with a significant negative health and societal impact. Data on rates of disease control and treatment strategies are lacking in Central and Eastern European countries. We aimed to describe the real-world disease severity, control, and treatment strategies for psoriasis in patients from Central and Eastern European countries. CRYSTAL (EUPAS36459) was a cross-sectional, retrospective study in adults (18-75 years) from Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, and Russia. We enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving continuous systemic treatment for ≥24 weeks. We used the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) to describe disease severity and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) to assess quality of life (QoL) and collected other outcomes [psoriasis work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI-PSO), patient satisfaction] at enrollment. Analyses were descriptive. A total of 690 patients were included in the analyses. Median disease duration was 11.8 years. Current treatment was monotherapy for most patients (95.8%) with either biological (BIO group; 88.4%) or conventional (NON-BIO group; 7.4%) agents. Mean (± standard deviation) absolute PASI scores were 3.5 ± 5.7, 3.1 ± 5.3, and 6.6 ± 7.4 in the overall population, the BIO group, and the NON-BIO group, respectively. Among patients treated with monotherapy, absolute PASI scores ≤1, ≤3, and ≤5 were observed for 44.1%, 72.0%, and 82.6% of BIO patients and 21.6%, 33.3%, and 49.0% of NON-BIO patients. Mean DLQI total score was 3.3 ± 5.1; higher scores were noted for higher absolute PASI. The most impacted WPAI-PSO domain was presenteeism; for all domains, impact increased with increased absolute PASI. A total of 91.8% of BIO patients and 74.5% of NON-BIO patients were satisfied with the current treatment. We observed a better disease control in BIO than NON-BIO patients. However, around half of BIO patients did not reach clear skin status and reported an impact on QoL. An improvement in treatment strategies is still needed in Central and Eastern European countries to optimize outcomes of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Role of IL-23 inhibitors including risankizumab and guselkumab in the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare and chronic inflammatory dermatologic condition characterized by hyperkeratotic salmon-colored plaques and palmoplantar keratoderma. Traditional therapeutic modalities have shown limited efficacy and often entail potential adverse effects, highlighting the need for alternative treatment options. Our review aims to summarize the current evidence on the off-label use of IL-23 inhibitors, risankizumab and guselkumab, in the treatment of PRP. These biologic agents have been approved for psoriasis, and their potential role in managing PRP has recently garnered interest. We conducted a comprehensive literature search on PubMed and Scopus databases, identifying relevant studies published in English up to June 2023 following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 10 studies were selected for data extraction and review. Results from the selected studies demonstrated encouraging outcomes with both risankizumab and guselkumab in managing PRP. Among 11 patients treated with risankizumab, 10 showed notable improvements in various disease manifestations, including pruritus, erythema, and affected body surface area. DLQI scores and BSA percentages reported a significant improvement before and after risankizumab treatment (p = 0.0322; p = 0.0216). However, two cases also reported symptom aggravation or even disease worsening. Patients treated with guselkumab exhibited ultimate improvement in all five cases, with complete clearance in three out of five cases. DLQI and BSA percentages also reported significant improvement with treatment with guselkumab (p = 0.0172; p < 0.0001). While most cases demonstrated positive outcomes, there were isolated instances of worsening symptoms, emphasizing the need for caution and further investigation. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is necessary to establish the efficacy, optimal dosing, and long-term safety of risankizumab and guselkumab in treating PRP. Overall, we provide valuable insights into the potential use of IL-23 inhibitors, risankizumab, and guselkumab, as promising treatment options for PRP. These biologics have shown efficacy in improving symptoms in treatment-resistant cases, offering new avenues for clinicians to explore in the treatment of PRP.

Steroids Used to Treat Acne Vulgaris: A Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Clinical Considerations.

Acne vulgaris is prevalent among adolescents and adults worldwide and can significantly impact patients' quality of life. Steroidal molecules, including oral and intralesional corticosteroids, combined oral contraceptives (COCs), oral spironolactone, and topical clascoterone, are an important part of the acne treatment armamentarium. The recommended use, mechanism of action, and available evidence supporting the use of steroids for acne treatment are reviewed, and differences in acne clinical presentation and treatment approaches based on patient characteristics relevant to the selection of an appropriate steroid are also discussed. Steroid-based approaches target the systemic or local hormones (ie, testosterone and androgens) and inflammation that contribute to acne pathogenesis. Oral corticosteroids are primarily used as a short-term adjunctive therapy early in treatment, whereas intralesional corticosteroid injections are used for individual acne lesions. COCs and oral spironolactone are limited to female patients who wish to avoid pregnancy. Topical clascoterone can be used by female and male patients 12 years of age and older. Patients' characteristics (including age and patients with darker skin color) and preferences for the route of administration can impact treatment response and adherence, respectively. Overall, healthcare providers must be aware of the differences among steroidal acne treatments and use shared decision-making to select the optimal therapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):404-409.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7846.

The Future of Atopic Dermatitis Treatment.

This chapter thoroughly examines recent breakthroughs in atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment, with a primary focus on the medications in the development pipeline. Biologics agents targeting new interleukin receptors like interleukin-31, interleukin-22, and interleukin-2 are discussed along with the novel pathway looking at the OX40-OX40L interaction. Oral agents and small molecule therapies like Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators, and Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors are also discussed along with the various new topical medications. Newly approved topicals like phosphodiesterase-4 and JAK inhibitors are highlighted while also discussing the potential of tapinarof and emerging microbiome-targeted therapies. Beyond conventional approaches, the chapter touches upon unconventional therapies currently being studied. The goal of this chapter is to discuss new advances in AD treatment from medications in the initial stages of development to those nearing FDA approval.

Isotretinoin's Effect on Fasting Lipid Profile in Acne Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the isotretinoin's effect on fasting lipid profile in patients with acne. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Outpatient Department of Dermatology, Dow International Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan, from 22nd June to 21st December 2022. METHODOLOGY: Patients of clinically moderate and severe acne were selected and prescribed a dose of 0.5mg /kg cap isotretinoin for 6 months. They were advised to get a fasting lipid profile at the baseline and then after two months of isotretinoin therapy. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 grading system and Adult Treatment Panel III were used for the grading of abnormalities. McNemar Bowker test was used to assess the difference in variables [serum triglycerides (TGs), cholesterol, high-density lipoproteins (HDL), and low-density lipoproteins (LDL)] at the baseline and after 2 months follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients were evaluated. After 2 months of isotretinoin therapy, TGs and cholesterol levels were elevated to higher grade in 2% of the patients. Likewise in 1% of patients, LDL levels rised to higher grade. Moreover, HDL levels declined to lower grade in 2% of the patients taking isotretinoin. CONCLUSION: Insignificant alterations in the various serum lipid parameters were observed in acne patients during isotretinoin therapy. It is advisable to obtain a baseline fasting lipid profile in all acne patients on isotretinoin and repeated in those with baseline abnormal levels and in patients with a clinical sign of metabolic syndrome and a family history of dyslipidemias. KEY WORDS: Acne, Hyperlipidemias, Isotretinoin, Laboratory monitoring.

Patient preferences for treatment attributes in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a discrete choice experiment.

Purpose: Evidence on treatment preferences of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in the United States (US) is limited and an assessment of treatment preferences in this group is warranted.Materials and methods: An online discrete choice experiment survey was conducted (June 2023) among US adults with self-reported moderate-to-severe AD or experience with systemic therapy who had inadequate response to topical treatments. Preference weights estimated from conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate willingness to trade off and attributes' relative importance (RI).Results: Participants (N = 300; mean age: 45 years; 70% females; 52% systemic therapy experienced) preferred treatments with higher efficacy, lower risk of adverse events (AEs), and less frequent blood tests (p < .05). Treatment attributes, from high to low RI, were itch control (38%), risk of cancer (23%), risk of respiratory infections (18%), risk of heart problems (11%), sustained improvement in skin appearance (5%), blood test frequency (3%), and frequency and mode of administration (2%); together, AE attributes accounted for more than half of the RI.Conclusions: Participants preferred AD treatments that maximize itch control while minimizing AE risks, whereas mode of administration had little impact on preferences. Understanding patients' preferences may help improve shared decision-making, potentially leading to enhanced patient satisfaction with treatment, increased engagement, and better clinical outcomes.

Effectiveness and safety of systemic therapy for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children and adolescent patients: a systematic review.

Importance: Due to comorbidities and associated safety risks, the management of severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in pediatric and adolescent patients poses significant challenges. Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents. Evidence review: On Feb 29, 2024, a systematic literature search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central). No date restrictions were applied. Randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, large case series, and meta-analyses were assessed to evaluate the efficacy (or effectiveness) and/or safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents. Findings: A preliminary search yielded 1457 results, from which 19 unique articles with a total of 3741 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, the available data for each systemic medication are limited, and the overall quality of the included studies on conventional systemic treatments is relatively low. When Dupilumab was used as a standalone treatment, 30%-40% of infants and toddlers aged 6 months to 2 years achieved EASI-75, while 50% of patients aged 2 to 6 years achieved EASI-75. In children aged 6 to 12 years, 33.0%-59.0% of atopic dermatitis patients achieved EASI-75, and when combined with topical corticosteroids (TCS), 69.7%-74.6% achieved EASI-75. Long-term data showed EASI-75 rates ranging from 75.0% to 94.0% for this age group. For adolescents aged 12 to 18 years, 40%-71% of patients achieved EASI-75 within 12 to 16 weeks, and by week 52, 80.8% of patients achieved EASI-75.Abrocitinib treatment resulted in 68.5%-72.0% of patients achieving EASI-75. Omalizumab treatment at week 24 showed a percentage change in SCORAD scores of -12.4%. In the Methotrexate treatment group, there was a SCORAD change of -26.25% at week 12, while the Cyclosporine A group had a SCORAD change of -25.01%. Patients treated with IVIG (Intravenous Immunoglobulin) showed a -34.4% change in SCORAD percentage scores at week 4, which further decreased by 47.12% at week 24. Patients receiving 4mg of Baricitinib and TCS had a 52.5% rate of EASI-75 at 16 weeks, and patients receiving different doses of upadacitinib had a 63-75% rate of EASI-75 at 16 weeks. The rate of EASI-75 at 16 weeks was around 28% in patients who received various doses of Tralokinumab.The most common adverse events observed were nasopharyngitis, respiratory events and dermatitis atopic. Conclusions and relevance: Awareness of adverse events and concomitant medications is crucial, and appropriate dosing and frequent laboratory and clinical monitoring are also essential. More real-world evidence and prospective cohort studies analyzing the effectiveness and safety of systemic therapies in children and adolescents are of paramount importance for optimizing personalized, effective, and safe management of the growing population of patients with atopic dermatitis in this age group.

Comparative analysis of persistence and remission with guselkumab versus secukinumab and ixekizumab in the United States.

Purpose: Real-world data comparing long-term performance of interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-17 inhibitors in psoriasis are limited. This study compared treatment persistence and remission among patients initiating guselkumab versus IL-17 inhibitors.Methods: Adults with psoriasis initiating guselkumab, secukinumab, or ixekizumab treatment (index date) were identified from Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases (01/01/2016-10/31/2021). Persistence was defined as no index biologic supply gaps of twice the labeled maintenance dosing interval. Remission was defined using an exploratory approach as index biologic discontinuation for ≥6 months without psoriasis-related inpatient admissions and treatments.Results: There were 3516 and 6066 patients in the guselkumab versus secukinumab comparison, and 3805 and 4674 patients in guselkumab versus ixekizumab comparison. At 18 months, the guselkumab cohort demonstrated about twice the persistence rate as secukinumab (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.15; p < 0.001) and ixekizumab cohorts (HR = 1.77; p < 0.001). At 6 months after index biologic discontinuation, the guselkumab cohort was 31% and 40% more likely to achieve remission than secukinumab (rate ratio [RR] = 1.31; p < 0.001) and ixekizumab cohorts (RR = 1.40; p < 0.001).Conclusions: Guselkumab was associated with greater persistence and likelihood of remission than IL-17 inhibitors, indicating greater disease control and modification potential.

Cardiovascular Considerations and Implications for Treatment in Psoriasis: An Updated Review.

Psoriasis, a prevalent chronic inflammatory skin disorder affecting 2-3% of the global population, has transcended its dermatological confines, revealing a profound association with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). This comprehensive review explores the intricate interplay between psoriasis and cardiovascular system, delving into genetic links, immune pathways, and adipose tissue dysfunction beyond conventional CVD risk factors. The pathophysiological connections unveil unique signatures, distinct from other inflammatory skin conditions, in particular psoriasis-specific genetic polymorphisms in IL-23 and TNF-α have consistently been linked to CVD. The review navigates the complex landscape of psoriasis treatments, addressing challenges and future directions in particular relevance to CVDs in psoriasis. Therapeutic interventions, including TNF inhibitors (TNFi), present promise in reducing cardiovascular risks, and methotrexate could constitute a favourable choice. Conversely, the relationship between IL-12/23 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk remains uncertain, while recent evidence indicates that Janus kinase inhibitors may not carry CVD risks. Emerging evidence supports the safety and efficacy of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors in patients with CVDs, hinting at evolving therapeutic paradigms. Lifestyle modifications, statins, and emerging therapies offer preventive strategies. Dedicated screening guidelines for CVD risk assessment in psoriasis are however lacking. Further, the impact of different disease phenotypes and treatment hierarchies in cardiovascular outcomes remains elusive, demanding ongoing research at the intersection of dermatology, rheumatology, and cardiology. In conclusion, unraveling the intricate connections between psoriasis and CVD provides a foundation for a holistic approach to patient care. Collaboration between specialties, advancements in screening methodologies, and a nuanced understanding of treatment impacts are essential for comprehensive cardiovascular risk management in individuals with psoriasis.

Psoriasis is a skin condition that not only affects the skin but is also linked to issues in the body's fat tissue, which can lead to inflammation and heart problems. The fat tissue in people with psoriasis contains various immune cells, contributing to obesity and insulin resistance. Research has found a strong connection between inflammation in fat tissues and cardiovascular problems in people with psoriasis. Specific substances released by fat tissue, like leptin, resistin, and adiponectin, can impact inflammation and cardiovascular health. Psoriasis patients often show increased levels of these substances. Treatment for psoriasis may influence cardiovascular health. Some studies suggest that certain medications, like methotrexate or TNF inhibitors, may lower the risk of heart events. However, there are also concerns about potential adverse effects, and further research is needed to fully understand how psoriasis treatments affect cardiovascular outcomes. To manage the cardiovascular risks associated with psoriasis, regular screening for heart-related issues is recommended. Lifestyle changes, such as a healthy diet, stress management, and smoking cessation, are also essential. Additionally, specific medications, like statins and metformin, may be beneficial in controlling cardiovascular risk factors in people with psoriasis. Despite advancements in understanding the relationship between psoriasis and cardiovascular health, there are still challenges. Research is ongoing to develop better screening guidelines and treatment strategies. Collaboration between dermatologists, rheumatologists, and cardiologists is crucial to address the complex nature of this condition and its impact on the heart.

Dose escalation of biologic treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Japan.

Patients receiving interleukin (IL)-inhibiting biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) may be treated with escalated doses to optimize outcomes. This study evaluated escalation prevalence in a Japanese claims analysis of patients with PsO diagnosis preceding IL-inhibiting biologic treatment and ≥1 post-induction maintenance claim (index date) with sufficient data availability from January 2014 to May 2022. Patients with non-persistence were excluded. Expected daily dose (EDD) was calculated as the recommended maintenance dose divided by the treatment interval. Dose escalation was defined as ≥2 claims showing a ≥20% increase in the observed average daily dose (ADD) over the EDD (with sensitivities requiring ≥1 claim and ≥30%). Significant differences were tested using multivariable regressions. The study included 982 unique patients treated with brodalumab (BRO; n = 104), guselkumab (GUS; n = 207), ixekizumab (IXE; n = 159), risankizumab (RIS; n = 135), secukinumab (SEC; n = 215) and ustekinumab (UST; n = 196). Within 12 months, dose escalation was observed for all IL-inhibiting biologics other than GUS and RIS: 44.4% for UST, 37.2% for IXE, 3.4% for SEC and 1.4% for BRO. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, odds of dose escalation were significantly lower for all products relative to UST. In sensitivities, escalation was observed for all products except RIS.

Successful secukinumab treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis.

Generalized pustular psoriasis is a rare variant of psoriasis. Evidence recommending generalized pustular psoriasis treatment with secukinumab is limited. This report aims to evaluate the use of secukinumab in two patients with generalized pustular psoriasis. The standard treatment regimen for secukinumab was as follows: 300mg subcutaneously once weekly in weeks 0-4, followed by 300mg every four weeks. The efficacy was evaluated by analyzing the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) and dermatology life quality index (DLQI). One patient had generalized pustular psoriasis, which had developed from palmoplantar pustulosis over 12 years. The second patient was an adolescent with recurrent generalized pustular psoriasis. The first patient achieved PASI-75 response by week 3 and both PASI-90 and a DLQI score of 0 were observed by week 8. The second patient achieved PASI-75 response by week 4 and complete clinical resolution, except for nail changes, and a DLQI of 0 by week 8, without any adverse events.

Editor's Highlights - June 2024.

Acne and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are chronic inflammatory skin conditions that significantly impact patients' quality of life. In the June issue of the Journal, we highlight the challenges in treating acne in skin of color (SOC) patients. Recent studies focusing on trifarotene, a selective retinoic acid receptor gamma agonist, demonstrated significant improvements in acne severity and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in SOC patients. We will also delve into the early and aggressive treatment of HS and highlight a link between HS and increased cardiovascular risk. These insights demand a paradigm shift toward a more proactive and holistic management of HS, integrating skin and systemic health considerations to enhance patient outcomes significantly.

A randomized controlled double-blinded split-face prospective clinical trial to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a novel 3-step routine compared to benzoyl peroxide for the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris.

Adult acne vulgaris affects up to 43-51% of individuals. While there are numerous treatment options for acne including topical, oral, and energy-based approaches, benzoyl peroxide (BPO) is a popular over the counter (OTC) treatment. Although BPO monotherapy has a long history of efficacy and safety, it suffers from several disadvantages, most notably, skin irritation, particularly for treatment naïve patients. In this prospective, randomized, controlled, split-face study, we evaluated the comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a novel 3-step azelaic acid, salicylic acid, and graduated retinol regimen versus a common OTC BPO-based regimen over 12 weeks. A total of 37 adult subjects with self-reported mild to moderate acne vulgaris were recruited. A total of 21 subjects underwent a 2-week washout period and completed the full study with 3 dropping out due to product irritation from the BPO routine, and 13 being lost to follow-up. Detailed tolerability surveys were conducted at Week 4. Additional surveys on tolerability and product preferences were collected monthly, at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. A blinded board-certified dermatologist objectively scored the presence and type of acne lesions (open or closed comedones, papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts) at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. Patients photographed themselves and uploaded the images using personal mobile phones. Detailed Week 4 survey results showed across 25 domains of user-assessed product performance, the novel routine outperformed the BPO routine in 19 (76%) which included domains in preference (e.g. "I would use this in the future) and performance ("my skin improved" and "helped my acne clear up faster"). Users of the novel routine reported less facial redness, itching, and burning, though differences did not reach statistical significance. In terms of efficacy, both products performed similarly, reducing total acne lesions by 36% (novel routine) and 40% (BPO routine) by Week 12. Overall, accounting for user preferences and tolerability the novel routine was more preferred than the BPO routine in 79% of domains (22/28). Differences in objective acne lesion reduction were not statistically significant (p = 0.97). In a randomized split-face study, a 3-step azelaic acid, salicylic acid, and graduated retinol regimen delivered similar acne lesion reduction, fewer user dropouts, greater user tolerability, and higher use preference compared to a 3-step BPO routine based in a cohort of participants with mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris.

Atopic Dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic relapsing, and remitting inflammatory skin disease that is characterized by erythematous, scaly, and pruritic lesions often located over the flexural surfaces. Treatment goals of AD include the reduction of itching and burning, as well as the reduction of skin changes. Treatment of AD includes emollients and skin care, topical therapies including topical corticosteroids and steroid-sparing therapies, systemic therapies, and phototherapy.

Exploring Acne Treatments: From Pathophysiological Mechanisms to Emerging Therapies.

Acne vulgaris is a common dermatological condition that can present across different ages but predominantly affects adolescents and young adults. Characterized by various lesion types, the pathogenesis of acne is complex, involving genetic, hormonal, microbial, and inflammatory factors. This review comprehensively addresses current and emerging acne management strategies, emphasizing both topical and systemic treatments, procedural therapies, and dietary modifications. Key topical agents include retinoids, benzoyl peroxide, antibiotics, and other specialized compounds. Systemic options like antibiotics, hormonal therapies, and retinoids offer significant therapeutic benefits, particularly for moderate to severe cases. Procedural treatments such as laser devices, photodynamic therapy, chemical peels, and intralesional injections present viable alternatives for reducing acne symptoms and scarring. Emerging therapies focus on novel biologics, bacteriophages, probiotics, and peptides, providing promising future options. This review underscores the importance of personalized approaches to treatment due to the multifaceted nature of acne, highlighting the potential of innovative therapies for improving patient outcomes.

American Academy of Dermatology Guidelines for Managing Atopic Dermatitis.

The American Academy of Dermatology first published a series of guidelines for diagnosing and managing atopic dermatitis in 2014. Twelve clinicians were selected to review, grade, and offer clinical insight on available data regarding the clinical features, symptomology, pathophysiology, education, treatment, and emerging clinical studies on atopic dermatitis (AD). Based on these findings, the AAD released a guideline to streamline information on atopic dermatitis for physicians, recommending using clinical evidence to diagnose and first treating with nonpharmacologic therapies to restore the natural skin barrier. Topical pharmacologic therapies were recommended for improving pruritus and inflammation and newer systemic agents for clinically relevant moderate-to-severe cases. Evidence-based practices were emphasized in comparison to those that lacked therapeutic data. To highlight the emerging evidence and pharmacologic breakthroughs in atopic dermatitis, the AAD produced an updated set of guidelines educating physicians on new agents and their role in treatment. This chapter reviews the AAD guidelines as a tool for managing atopic dermatitis and staying up to date on disease advancements.