[Impact of buried versus exposed flexible intramedullary nails osteosynthesis on pediatric forearm fractures]. / Impacto de los clavos intramedulares flexibles frente a los expuestos para osteosíntesis en fracturas pediátricas de antebrazo.

In elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN), there are different opinions among surgeons on whether to leave the nail buried in the same arm or to leave it exposed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of re-fracture in patients with a nail buried directly into the amr or left exposed as a treatment for forearm fractures, and to investigate postoperative complications. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The study included 113 pediatric patients with a forearm fracture of both diaphyses. Two groups were formed according to whether the nail was buried (Group B, n: 53) in the same arm or left exposed (Group E, n: 60). Data on the number of open reductions, the time to nail removal, the anesthesia type used for its removal, the number of re-fractures, skin infection, and nail entry site irritation were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean union times between the groups were not significantly different (P = 0.371). The mean time of nail removal in group B (16.02 ± 1.29 weeks) was significantly longer than that of group E (6.65 ± 0.95 weeks) (P < 0.001). Open reduction rates were similar between groups (P = 0.401). The general anesthesia rate for nail removal in group B (77.4%) was significantly higher than group E (11.7%) (P < 0.001). The re-fracture rate was higher in patients who underwent open reduction in both groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated that, despite the increased infection rate, leaving the nail exposed did not increase the re-fracture rate, which was associated with open reduction.

Practical techniques for safely removing long-term implanted ventricular catheters to minimize bleeding.

INTRODUCTION: Removing ventricular catheters, particularly those implanted for extended periods, poses significant challenges for neurosurgeons due to potential complications such as bleeding from adhesions to the ependyma or choroid plexus. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review various techniques for safely removing ventricular catheters, emphasizing methods that minimize the risk of hemorrhagic complications. METHODS: A comprehensive narrative review focused on techniques developed and documented in the literature for safely detaching ventricular catheters adhered to brain structures. RESULTS: Various techniques have been identified that enhance the safety of catheter removal. Notably, the use of monopolar diathermy to coagulate and release adhesions has proven effective. Innovations such as insulated suction devices and the strategic use of flexible endoscopes have also contributed to safer removal procedures, minimizing the risk of damaging surrounding cerebral tissue and preventing catastrophic hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: The removal of ventricular catheters, especially those with long-term implantation, requires precise and cautious techniques to avoid severe complications. The study underscores the importance of adopting advanced surgical techniques and the continuous evolution of safer practices in neurosurgery. These methods not only ensure patient safety but also facilitate the handling of potentially complex and life-threatening situations during catheter removal.

Explantador de Cabrera: un nuevo dispositivo para explantar endoprótesis aórticas después de reparo endovascular de aneurisma de aorta, un estudio experimental ex vivo / Cabrera explanter: a new device to explant aortic stents after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, an ex vivo experimental study

Introducción. Las complicaciones posteriores a la reparación endovascular de aneurisma (EVAR) pueden resolverse con técnicas endovasculares. Sin embargo, cuando está indicada, la explantación de una endoprótesis es un procedimiento complejo, que se asocia a lesiones vasculares o viscerales, con alta morbimortalidad, en pacientes con edad avanzada y múltiples comorbilidades, y por lo tanto, alto riesgo quirúrgico. No existen dispositivos producidos por la industria para explantar las endoprótesis aórticas, por lo que el objetivo de este trabajo fue desarrollar un dispositivo para la explantación de endoprótesis aórticas. Métodos. Se llevó a cabo un estudio experimental, en fase preclínica, para desarrollar un dispositivo para la explantación de endoprótesis aórticas, con pruebas en modelos 3D y en un modelo animal porcino cadavérico. Resultados. Es factible desarrollar un modelo experimental de un nuevo dispositivo para explantar endoprótesis aórticas, denominado explantador de Cabrera, y comprobar su funcionamiento en un modelo animal cadavérico. El uso del explantador de Cabrera limitó el daño de la pared aórtica por parte de la endoprótesis en un 100 % al momento de su explantación en un modelo experimental ex vivo. Conclusión. Usando una jeringa septo, el explantador de Cabrera es superior a la técnica estándar de explantación de una endoprótesis al limitar la lesión de la pared aórtica, al colapsar y liberar los ganchos de fijación suprarrenal de forma controlada y segura al interior de la luz aórtica y, posteriormente, extraerla de forma rápida y efectiva, conservando la mayor cantidad de aorta sana para la posterior reconstrucción aorto-ilíaca.

Introduction. Complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) can be resolved with endovascular techniques; however, when indicated, stent explantation is a complex procedure, which is associated with vascular or visceral injuries, with high morbidity and mortality in patients, with advanced age and multiple comorbidities, and therefore high surgical risk. There are no devices produced by the industry to explant aortic endoprostheses, so the objective of this work was to develop a device for the explantation of aortic endoprostheses. Methods. An experimental study was carried out, in the preclinical phase, to develop a device for the explantation of aortic endoprostheses, with tests in 3D models and in a cadaveric porcine animal model. Results. It is feasible to develop an experimental model of a new device for explanting aortic endoprostheses, called Cabrera explanter, and verify its operation in a cadaveric animal model. The use of the Cabrera explanter limited damage to the aortic wall by the endoprosthesis by 100% at the time of explantation in an ex vivo experimental model. Conclusions. Using a septum syringe, the Cabrera explanter is superior to the standard stent explantation technique by limiting injury to the aortic wall, collapsing and releasing the adrenal fixation hooks in a controlled and safe manner into the aortic lumen, and subsequently, extract it quickly and effectively, preserving the greatest amount of healthy aorta for the subsequent aorto-iliac reconstruction.

Comparison of early and late removal of the urinary catheter after rectal cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study is aiming to compare the results of early and late removal of urinary catheters after rectal cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who undergone rectal cancer surgery in a single center were included in this prospective randomized study. The timing of the urinary catheter removal was randomized by a computer-assisted program and divided into 2 groups, which are early (first 48 h) and late (after 48 h). The primary outcome of this study was to compare the urinary retention and re-catheterization rates between patients with early and those with late catheter removal. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included in this study. The median age was 60 (31-88 years), and the patient group was predominantly male (n: 40, 60.9%). Urinary retention after catheter removal developed in 8 (12%) of 66 patients. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of the need for re-catheterization (14% vs. 10%, p: 0.63). All the patients who required re-catheterization (n: 8) and were discharged with a urinary catheter (n: 4) were male. When the male and female patients were evaluated separately, there was no difference in urinary retention in the early or late groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early or late removal of the catheter does not play a role in the development of urinary retention in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery.

OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados de la retirada precoz y tardía de la sonda urinaria tras la cirugía de cáncer rectal. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo aleatorizado que incluyó pacientes sometidos a cirugía de cáncer rectal en un único centro. El momento de la retirada de la sonda urinaria se aleatorizó y se dividió en dos grupos: primeras 48 horas y después de 48 horas. Se compararon las tasas de retención urinaria y de nueva cateterización entre los pacientes con retirada precoz y tardía de la sonda. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 66 pacientes, con una mediana de edad de 60 años (31-88 años) y predominio del sexo masculino (n = 40, 60.9%). Se produjo retención urinaria tras la retirada de la sonda en 8 (12%). No hubo diferencias entre los dos grupos en cuanto a necesidad de nueva cateterización (14% frente a 10%, p = 0.63). Todos los pacientes que precisaron un nuevo cateterismo (n = 8) y fueron dados de alta con una sonda urinaria (n = 4) eran varones. CONCLUSIONES: La retirada precoz o tardía de la sonda no influye en la aparición de retención urinaria en pacientes intervenidos de cáncer de recto.

Device-related outcomes following hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) has been widely used to treat obstructive sleep apnea in selected patients. Here we evaluate rates of revision and explant related to HGNS implantation and assess types of adverse events contributing to revision and explant. METHODS: Postmarket surveillance data for HGNS implanted between January 1, 2018 and March 31, 2022, were collected. Event rates and risk were calculated using the postmarket surveillance event counts and sales volume over the same period. Indications were categorized for analysis. Descriptive statistics were reported and freedom from explant or revision curves were grouped by year of implantation. RESULTS: Of the 20,881 HGNS implants assessed, rates of explant and revision within the first year were 0.723% and 1.542%, respectively. The most common indication for explant was infection (0.378%) and for revision was surgical correction (0.680%). Of the 5,820 devices with 3-year postimplantation data, the rate of explant was 2.680% and of revision was 3.557%. During this same interval, elective removal (1.478%) was the most common indication, and for revisions, surgical correction (1.134%). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of HGNS is comparable in the real world setting to published clinical trial data. Rates of explant and revision are low, supporting a satisfactory safety profile for this technology. CITATION: Moroco AE, Wei Z, Byrd I, et al. Device-related outcomes following hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(9):1497-1503.

Antibiotics prophylaxis at the time of catheter removal after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic literature review with meta-analysis to identify whether antibiotic prophylaxis after removal of the indwelling urinary catheter reduces posterior infections. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted in the databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, using the keywords "antibiotics" AND "prostatectomy" AND "urinary catheter." RESULTS: Three articles were identified having the scope of our review, with 1,040 patients, which were subjected to our meta-analysis revealing a marginally significant decrease in the risk of urinary infection after indwelling urinary catheter removal (odds ratio-OR = 0.51; 95% confidence interval-95%CI 0.27-0.98; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%). No difference was found regarding the presence of bacteriuria (OR = 0.39; 95%CI 0.12-1.24; p = 0.11; I2 = 73%). CONCLUSIONS: In our meta-analysis, there was a significant decrease in urinary tract infection with antibiotic prophylaxis after indwelling urinary catheter removal following radical prostatectomy.

The Knotted Urethral Catheter-Description of a Novel Technique and Steps for Removal.

ABSTRACT: The spontaneous intravesicular knotting of a feeding tube used for urethral catheterization is a rare but documented complication. The reported incidence in the world literature is 0.2 per 100,000, with only 40 cases reported. Removal of these intravesicular knots has been attempted in a number of ways, such as the use of a guide wire to untangle the knot, use of excess lubrication and traction with or without anesthetic, and percutaneous or open cystostomy. This cystoscopic technique for removal has not been previously described.Based on our experience and published recommendations, we formulate an algorithm for removal. We outline steps for prevention and techniques from simple to complex, which can be used to remove knotted catheters.Although a rare complication of catheterization in children, catheter knotting can be troublesome. Following the steps suggested in this algorithm may avoid the use of more invasive techniques for removal.

Site necrosis at the insertion place of the single-rod subdermal contraceptive implant: report of five cases.

OBJECTIVE: Implant-site necrosis is a rare complication. We present a case-series of a necrosis as an adverse effect after the etonogestrel (ENG)-subdermal contraceptive implant placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five women with site necrosis after the ENG-implant placement and their clinical manifestations and treatments. RESULTS: Local pain was the main symptom, appearing within 35 days of placement. Outpatient multidisciplinary treatment was undertaken. Local debridement and implant removal was performed in four out of the five women. Time to complete healing varied from 45 days to 12 months. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment are essential to avoid severe aesthetic or functional damages and major life-threatening complications.

We presented five cases with necrosis at the ENG-implant site of placement in which we proposed an early diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment to avoid severe aesthetic or functional damages.

Apendicitis aguda secundaria a obstrucción de orificio apendicular por migración de prótesis biliar / Acute appendicitis due to migration of a biliary prosthesis

La apendicitis aguda es la patología quirúrgica abdominal más común alrededor del mundo. Presentamos un caso de un paciente de 78 años que se presentó con un cuadro de apendicitis aguda en el servicio de urgencias. La tomografía computada de abdomen y pelvis mostró una apendicitis aguda secundaria a la obstrucción del orificio apendicular por una prótesis biliar migrada. Se realizó un manejo exitoso mediante el retiro de la prótesis por colonoscopía, permitiendo el alta hospitalaria del paciente 72 horas posteriores al ingreso.

Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical abdominal pathology worldwide that requires immediate intervention. We report a 78-year-old patient who presented with acute appendicitis. A computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis showed acute appendicitis due to appendiceal orifice obstruction from a migrated biliary stent. The condition was successfully treated nonoperatively with endoscopic stent removal, allowing his discharge 72 hours after his admission.

Performing AI 55 or 65 h after progesterone device removal did not differ in a 7-d progesterone-based protocol for timed-AI in Nellore suckled cows.

This study aimed to evaluate the reproductive performance of Nellore suckled cows inseminated 55 (n = 304) or 65 (n = 296) h after progesterone (P4) removal in a 7-d protocol. The protocol consisted of the insertion of a device with 2 g of P4 and 2 mg of estradiol benzoate on d 0, with the device remaining in the cows for 7 d. Cows in the 55-h treatment had the P4 device removed in the morning, while cows in the 65-h treatment had the P4 device removed in the afternoon. At P4 removal, cows received intramuscularly 300 IU of eCG, 0.6 mg of estradiol cypionate and 0.52 mg cloprostenol sodium. Artificial insemination was performed according to treatments (55 vs. 65 h after P4 removal). The results of the study showed that the estrus detection rate (69% vs 65%) and pregnancy per AI (P/AI; 49% vs 49%) did no differ in cows inseminated 55 or 65 h after P4 removal, respectively. Furthermore, ovulation rate, the diameter of the largest follicle at the time of AI, and P4 concentration after AI were not affected by treatments. The probability of P/AI was not affected by parity, BCS, age, diameter of largest follicle at AI, days postpartum, BW and time to AI. This study suggests that performing AI from 55 to 65 h after the P4 removal in the 7-d-P4 protocol did not affect the reproductive performance in Nellore cows, and opens the possibility for producers to take more time to perform AI of cows in the field without affecting P/AI.

[Long-term follow-up of tracheostomized patients post severe acquired brain injury]. / Seguimiento a largo plazo de pacientes traqueostomizados post injuria cerebral adquirida grave.

INTRODUCTION: About 50% of patients hospitalized for severe acquired brain injury require tracheostomy, and many of them need long-term care. The main objective of this study was to describe the evolution of patients with severe acquired brain injury (sABI) tracheotomized who entered rehabilitation. Secondarily, mortality related to the success or failure of decannulation and survival at 12 months of discharge were studied. METHODS: A single-center prospective observational quantitative study. Users over 18 years of age were recruited prospectively and consecutively, tracheostomized after sABI, and admitted to a rehabilitation center between April 2018 and March 2020. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included for analysis. The stay in the center was 203 (RIQ 93-320) days. At discharge to the institution, 32 (64%) patients managed to be successfully decannulated. The median number of days from admission to the center to decannulation was 49 (12-172). No decannulation failure was observed. Mortality at 12 months follow-up was 32%, five (16%) of the 32 patients who managed to be decannulated, and 11 (61%) of 18 who failed to achieve decannulation died within 12 months of follow-up. The relationship between decannulation success and mortality at 12 months of follow-up was statistically significant (p= 0.002). DISCUSSION: Addressing the decannulation process early and properly guided is relevant as it may impact long-term survival.

Introducción: Alrededor del 50% de los pacientes hospitalizados por injuria cerebral adquirida grave requieren traqueostomía y cuidados a largo plazo. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue describir la evolución de enfermos con injuria cerebral adquirida grave (ICAg) traqueostomizados que ingresaron a rehabilitación. Secundariamente se estudió el fracaso de la decanulación y la supervivencia a los 12 meses del alta. Métodos: estudio cuantitativo observacional prospectivo de centro único. Se incorporó al estudio, de forma prospectiva y consecutiva, usuarios mayores de 18 años, traqueostomizados posterior a ICAg ingresados a un centro de rehabilitación entre abril de 2018 y marzo de 2020. Resultados: se incluyeron para el análisis 50 pacientes. La estancia en el centro fue de 203 (RIQ 93-320) días. Al alta de la institución, 32 (64%) pacientes pudieron ser decanulados exitosamente. El tiempo transcurrido desde el ingreso al centro hasta la decanulación fue de 49 (12-172) días. No se observó fracaso de la decanulación. La mortalidad a los 12 meses de seguimiento fue de 32%, cinco (16%) de los 32 pacientes que pudieron ser decanulados y 11 (61%) de los 18 que no lograron la decanulación fallecieron dentro de los 12 meses de seguimiento. La relación entre la decanulación y la mortalidad a los 12 meses de seguimiento resultó estadísticamente significativa (p = 0.002). Discusión: La supervivencia global fue relativamente elevada, el proceso de decanulación resulta relevante ya que puede tener impacto en la supervivencia a largo plazo.

Removal Rate of the Tomofix® System after High Tibial Osteotomy is Higher Than Reported / A taxa de remoção do sistema Tomofix® após a osteotomia tibial alta é superior à relatada

Abstract Objective Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) significantly relieves pain in the medial joint line in medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. But some patients complain of pain over the pes anserinus even 1 year after the osteotomy, which may require implant removal for relief. This study aims to define the implant removal rate after MOWHTO due to pain over the pes anserinus. Methods One hundred and three knees of 72 patients who underwent MOWHTO for medial compartment osteoarthritis between 2010 and 2018 were enrolled in the study. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), Oxford knee score (OKS), and visual analogue score (VAS) were assessed for pain in the medial knee joint line (VAS-MJ) preoperatively, 12 months postoperatively, and yearly thereafter; adding VAS for pain over the pes anserinus (VAS-PA). Patients with VAS-PA ≥ 40 and adequate bony consolidation after 12 months were recommended implant removal. Results Thirty-three (45.8%) of the patients were male and 39 (54.2%) were female. The mean age was 49.4 ± 8.0 and the mean body mass index was 27.0 ± 2.9. The Tomofix medial tibial plate-screw system (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA) was used in all cases. Three (2.8%) cases with delayed union requiring revision were excluded. The KOOS, OKS, and VAS-MJ significantly improved 12 months after MOWHTO. The mean VAS-PA was 38.3 ± 23.9. Implant removal for pain relief was needed in 65 (63.1%) of the103 knees. The mean VAS-PA decreased to 4.5 ± 5.6 3 months after implant removal (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Over 60% of the patients may need implant removal to relieve pain over the pes anserinus after MOWHTO. Candidates for MOWHTO should be informed about this complication and its solution.

Resumo Objetivo A osteotomia tibial alta com cunha de abertura medial (MOWHTO, do inglês medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy) alivia de forma significativa a dor na linha articular medial em casos de osteoartrite do compartimento medial do joelho. Alguns pacientes, porém, se queixam de dor nos tendões dos músculos sartório, grácil e semitendinoso (pata de ganso) mesmo 1 ano após a osteotomia, o que pode exigir a remoção do implante. Este estudo define a taxa de remoção do implante após a MOWHTO devido à dor nos tendões dos músculos sartório, grácil e semitendinoso. Métodos Cento e três joelhos de 72 pacientes submetidos à MOWHTO para tratamento da osteoartrite do compartimento medial entre 2010 e 2018 foram incluídos no estudo. A pontuação de desfecho de lesão no joelho e osteoartrite (KOOS, do inglês Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), a pontuação dejoelho de Oxford (OKS, do inglês Oxford Knee Score) e a escala visual analógica (EVA) de dor na linha articular medial do joelho (EVA-MJ) foram avaliados antes da cirurgia. A EVA nos tendões dos músculos sartório, grácil e semitendinoso (EVA-PA) foi adicionada a essas avaliações, também realizadas 12 meses após o procedimento e, a seguir, anualmente. A remoção do implante foi recomendada em pacientes com EVA-PA ≥ 40 e consolidação óssea adequada em 12 meses. Resultados Trinta e três (45,8%) pacientes eram homens e 39 (54,2%), mulheres. A média de idade foi de 49,4 ±8,0, e o índice de massa corpórea (IMC) médio foi de 27,0 ± 2,9. O sistema placa-parafuso tibial medial Tomofix (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, EUA) foi utilizado em todos os casos. Três (2,8%) casos foram excluídos devido ao retardo de consolidação e à necessidade de revisão. Os resultados nas escalas KOOS, OKS e EVA-MJ melhoraram significativamente 12 meses após a MOWHTO. A EVA-PA média foi de 38,3 ± 23,9. A remoção do implante para alívio da dor foi necessária em 65 (63,1%) dos 103 joelhos. Três meses após a remoção do implante, a EVA-PA média diminuiu para 4,5 ± 5,6 (p < 0,0001). Conclusão A remoção do implante pode ser necessária em mais de 60% dos pacientes para alívio da dor nos tendões dos músculos sartório, grácil e semitendinoso após a MOWHTO. Os candidatos à MOWHTO devem ser informados sobre esta complicação e sua resolução.

Enterocutaneous fistula due to a Richter's hernia after a Tenckhoff catheter removal.

Richter's hernia is a rare type of hernia that occurs when the antimesenteric intestinal wall protrudes through a defect in the abdominal fascia leading to ischaemia, gangrene, bowel perforation and enterocutaneous fistulae. In this article, we describe a rare case of enterocutaneous fistula due to a Richter's hernia after a Tenckhoff catheter removal. This type of complication has not been previously reported in the literature. An 82-year-old man presented with a 1-day history of enteric content at the Tenckhoff catheter insertion site. Seven weeks earlier, the catheter was removed due to peritonitis. Removal was performed using open technique, and the fascia was not closed. Computed tomography revealed a small incarcerated hernia and subcutaneous fluid collection at the previous catheter insertion site. He underwent laparoscopy, which showed a Richter's hernia with perforation of the ileum causing an enterocutaneous fistula. A laparoscopic enterectomy was performed using a primary mechanical anastomosis. The hernia was repaired by primary suture without a mesh because of wound enteral contamination and the small size of the hernia. Richter's hernia has a misleading clinical presentation and contributes to high rates of morbidity and mortality. A secure myofascial closure during catheter removal may reduce the chances of this complication.

[Acute appendicitis due to migration of a biliary prosthesis]. / Apendicitis aguda secundaria a obstrucción de orificio apendicular por migración de prótesis biliar.

Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical abdominal pathology worldwide that requires immediate intervention. We report a 78-year-old patient who presented with acute appendicitis. A computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis showed acute appendicitis due to appendiceal orifice obstruction from a migrated biliary stent. The condition was successfully treated nonoperatively with endoscopic stent removal, allowing his discharge 72 hours after his admission.

Decannulation: a retrospective cohort study of clinical and swallowing indicators of success.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical and swallowing indicators related to a successful decannulation process during the hospital stay. METHODS: A retrospective cohort clinical study. The study sample comprised a heterogeneous patient population who had submitted to a tracheostomy procedure in a tertiary hospital. Patients were divided into two groups (decannulated vs. non-decannulated) and compared not only in terms of demographic and clinical data but also the results of a swallowing assessment and intervention outcome. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included in the present study: 25 (39%) who had been successfully decannulated, and 39 (61%) who could not be decannulated. Between-group comparisons indicated that both groups presented similar clinical and demographic characteristics. The groups also presented similar swallowing assessment results prior to intervention. However, significant differences were observed regarding the time to begin swallowing rehabilitation. The decannulated group was assessed nine days earlier than the non-decannulated group. Other significant differences included the removal of the alternate feeding method (72.0% of decannulated patients vs. 5.1% of non-decannulated patients) and the reintroduction of oral feeding (96.0% of decannulated patients vs. 41.0% of non-decannulated patients) and functional swallowing level at patient disclosure. The non-decannulated patient group presented higher death rates at disclosure. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study indicated that the following parameters were associated with a successful decannulation process: early swallowing assessment, swallowing rehabilitation, and improvement in the swallowing functional level during the hospital stay. The maintenance of low swallowing functional levels was found to be negatively associated with successful decannulation.

Retiro de elementos de osteosíntesis en trauma maxilofacial / Osteosynthesis elements removal in maxillofacial trauma

Resumen Objetivo: Analizar la prevalencia y los factores en la remoción de elementos de osteosíntesis (OTS) de pacientes tratados quirúrgicamente debido a fracturas maxilofaciales. Materiales y Método: Estudio retrospectivo descriptivo, donde fueron incluidos todos los pacientes con diagnóstico de fractura maxilofacial y tratados mediante reducción abierta y fijación interna rígida en un intervalo de 10 años, en el Servicio de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial en el Hospital Clínico Mutual de Seguridad (HCMS). Resultados: En un total de 807 pacientes intervenidos, con un rango etario entre 22-66 años, fueron utilizados 2.421 OTS. Entre ellos, 58 pacientes (7,2%) fueron sometidos a un segundo procedimiento quirúrgico, retirándose un total de 129 OTS (5,3%). La principal causa de retiro fue infección (41,1%), comúnmente de carácter tardío. El tercio inferior facial fue el más afectado, específicamente, la zona parasinfisiaria. El 39% fue retirado antes de los 12 meses de posicionados. Conclusiones: El retiro de OTS, posterior a trauma maxilofacial tiene una baja prevalencia. El sitio más afectado es el hueso mandibular y la mayoría se retira dentro de los primeros 12-24 meses. La etiología es variable, sin embargo, la infección se mantiene como una de las principales. Los hallazgos sugieren que no sería recomendable realizar este procedimiento de forma universal para todos los pacientes.

Aim: To analyse the prevalence and factors regarding to osteosynthesis elements (OTS) removal from patients surgically treated due to maxillofacial fractures. Materials and Method: Retrospective study in which all patients with diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures and treated with open reduction and internal rigid fixation were included, in an interval of 10 years, in the Maxillofacial Surgery Service of HCMS. Results: In 807 surgically treated patients, with an age between 22-66 years, 2.421 OTS were used. Among them, 58 patients (7.2%) underwent a second surgical procedure, with a total of 129 OTS removed (5.3%). The main cause of removal was infection (41.1%), commonly of a chronic nature. The lower third of the face was the most affected, specifically, the parasymphysis region. 39% of OTS were withdrawn before 12 months. Conclusions: OTS removal after maxillofacial trauma has a low prevalence, the most affected site is the mandibular bone, within the first 12-24 months. The aetiology is variable, however, infection remains one of the main. The findings suggest that it would not be advisable to perform this procedure universally for all patients.

Tracheostomy Decannulation and Disorders of Consciousness Evolution.

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy is a frequent surgical procedure in subjects with chronic disorders of consciousness (DOC). There is no consensus about safety of tracheostomy decannulation in this population.The aim of our study was to estimate if DOC improvement is a predictor for tracheostomy decannulation. Secondary outcomes include mortality rate and discharge destination. METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective, case-control study at a weaning and rehabilitation center (WRC). We included tracheostomized subjects with DOC admitted between August 2015 and December 2017. We matched groups based on the consciousness level at admission assessed withthe coma recovery scale revised (CRS-R). Subjects who were later decannulated formed the cases, while those that remained tracheostomized at the end of follow-up formed the controls. Improvement of DOC was defined as a progress in the categories of the CRS-R. RESULTS: 22 subjects were included in each group. No significant differences were found in clinical and demographic variables, except that controls had longer neurologic injury evolution (65.5 vs 51 days, P = .047), more tracheostomy days at admission to ourinstitution (53 vs 33.5, P = .02), and higher prevalence of neurological comorbidities (12 vs 4, P = .03). Subjects who improved their DOC had more chances of being decannulated (OR 11.28, 95% CI 1.96-123.08). Tracheostomy decannulation could not be achieved in most subjects who did not improve from vegetative state (VS) (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.60). 8 subjects, however, could be decannulated in VS, with only one decannulation failure and no deaths. Mortality was higher in controls (0 vs 6, P = .02), especially among VS (0 vs 5, P = .049). No significant differences were found in discharge destination between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects who improve their DOC are more likely to achieve tracheostomy decannulation. Some subjects in VS were decannulated, with lower mortality than those who remained tracheostomized.

Percutaneous retrieval of intravascular foreign body in children: a case series and review.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous retrieval of intravascular foreign bodies has recently increased as a treatment option. PURPOSE: To report our single-center experience of the percutaneous retrieval of 14 intravascular embolized catheter fragments in children and to conduct a literature review. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE databases were searched for case reports and series including children and iatrogenic catheter fragments or guidewires retrieved through percutaneous techniques. We also conducted a retrospective analysis of 14 cases from our institution over a 14-year period. A total of 27 studies were selected comprising 74 children, plus our 14 unpublished cases. Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel version 2016. RESULTS: Port catheter fragments and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) were the most embolized foreign bodies and the pulmonary artery was the most common site of embolization in 44.1% of cases. Analysis of the retrieval technique demonstrated a preference for extraction through the femoral vein (81.7%) and using snare techniques (93.5%). The success rate of percutaneous retrieval was 96.6% with only 1.1% of procedure-related complications. Patients were asymptomatic in 77.2% of cases, presented septic complications in 2.3%, and no deaths were reported. Median fluoroscopy time was 10 min (range = 1.7-80 min) and median procedure length was 60 min (range = 35-208 min). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous retrieval of intravascular foreign bodies is a feasible, safe, and efficient technique in children and should be considered the preferred treatment option.