Sex hormone-binding globulin is a valuable diagnostic indicator of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Objective: To assess the performance of the Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) assay as a diagnostic indicator of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) in the study population. Design: Analytical cross-sectional study. Setting: Hospital-based, Benue State University Teaching Hospital (BSUTH), Makurdi, Nigeria. Participants: Women with singleton pregnancies at 24 to 28 weeks gestational age attending Antenatal care at BSUTH, Makurdi. Intervention: Serum SHBG levels were assayed by ELISA during a diagnostic 75-gram Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) for assessment of GDM in the cohort of consecutively selected participants who met the inclusion criteria. Main Outcome Measures: Serum levels of SHBG and presence of GDM in the participants. Result: Serum SHBG was significantly negatively correlated (rpb = - 0.534, p-value < 0.001) with the presence of GDM. It had an area under the ROC curve of 0.897 (95% Confidence Interval = 0.858-0.935; p-value < 0.001). A cut-off value of 452.0 nmol/L indicative of GDM had a diagnostic odds ratio of 21.4 in the study population. Conclusion: SHBG is a valuable diagnostic indicator for GDM in the study population. Funding: None declared.

Association between atherogenic index of plasma and gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study based on the Korean population.

BACKGROUND: Atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) is a non-traditional lipid parameter that can reflect the burden of atherosclerosis. A lipid profile resembling atherosclerosis emerged during pregnancy. Although lipid metabolism is pivotal in diabetes pathogenesis, there is no evidence linking AIP to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Therefore, our objective was to explore the relationship between AIP and GDM and assess AIP's predictive capability for GDM. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis based on data from a prospective cohort study in Korea involving 585 single pregnant women. AIP was calculated as log10 (TG/HDL). We examined the relationship between AIP and GDM using logistic regression models, curve fitting, sensitivity analyses, and subgroup analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was also used to determine the ability of AIP to predict GDM. RESULTS: The average age of the participants was 32.06 ± 3.76 years. The AIP was 0.24 ± 0.20 on average. The GDM incidence was 6.15%. After adjustment for potentially confounding variables, AIP showed a positive linear relationship with GDM (P for non-linearity: 0.801, OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.27-1.97). The robustness of the connection between AIP and GDM was demonstrated by sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses. An area under the ROC curve of 0.7879 (95% CI 0.7087-0.8671) indicates that AIP is an excellent predictor of GDM. With a specificity of 75.41% and sensitivity of 72.22%, the ideal AIP cut-off value for identifying GDM was 0.3557. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that the AIP at 10-14 weeks of gestation was independently and positively correlated with GDM risk. AIP could serve as an early screening and monitoring tool for pregnant women at high risk of GDM, thereby optimizing GDM prevention strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT02276144.

Infant of a diabetic mother: clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment.

An infant of a diabetic mother is defined as a newborn born to a mother who has diabetes during pregnancy. The term diabetic mother refers to pregnant women with diabetes diagnosed either before (type 1 or 2 diabetes) or during pregnancy (gestational diabetes). Rising incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in young women and increasing maternal age at conception account for the higher risk of birth complications and adverse maternal and infant outcomes. Infants of diabetic mothers (IDMs) because of mother's diabetes are prone to developing complications and the most common include: large birth weight and complications resulting from it (i.e. birth injuries, perinatal asphyxia), cardiovascular and respiratory insufficiency (poor tolerance of labor stress), neonatal hypoglycemia and it's complications, delayed lung maturity (fetal hyperinsulinism and the opposite function of insulin to cortisol), cardiomegaly and hypertrophy of the intraventricular septum (functional narrowing of the outflow of the left ventricle and cardiac failure), congenital malformations (most often of the central nervous system and heart). Less common complications in IDMs are: persistent pulmonary hypertension, hyperbilirubinemia, renal vein thrombosis, small left colon syndrome, intrauterine death, polycythemia, and a predisposition to obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes later in life. This article presents current knowledge about pathological conditions and the recommended management for IDMs.

Mid-upper arm circumference predicts the risk of gestational diabetes in early pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The present work aimed to assess the value of mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) at 8 to 12 weeks in predicting the occurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: According to eligibility criteria, 328 women with singleton pregnancies who underwent routine antenatal check-ups at Qinhuangdao Maternal and Child Health Hospital from September 2017 to September 2020 were included. The patients were divided into the gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and non-GDM groups according to oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) data from gestation weeks 24 to 28. Clinical data were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors independently predicting GDM. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to analyze the value of MUAC in predicting the occurrence of GDM. The optimal cut-off points were calculated. RESULTS: In logistic regression analysis, pre-pregnancy weight, waist circumference, MUAC, UA, TG, and HDL-C independently predicted the occurrence of GDM (P < 0.05). MUAC retained statistical significance upon adjustment for various confounders (OR = 8.851, 95%CI: 3.907-20.048; P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed good diagnostic potential for MUAC in GDM (AUC = 0.742, 95%CI: 0.684-0.800, P < 0.001), with a cut-off of 28.5 cm, sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with MUAC >28.5 cm are prone to develop GDM during pregnancy, indicating that MUAC as an important predictive factor of GDM in early pregnancy.

Changing diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes (CDC4G) in Sweden: A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation (WHO) 2013 diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been criticised due to the limited evidence of benefits on pregnancy outcomes in different populations when switching from previously higher glycemic thresholds to the lower WHO-2013 diagnostic criteria. The aim of this study was to determine whether the switch from previous Swedish (SWE-GDM) to the WHO-2013 GDM criteria in Sweden following risk factor-based screening improves pregnancy outcomes. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial was performed between January 1 and December 31, 2018 in 11 clusters (17 delivery units) across Sweden, including all pregnancies under care and excluding preexisting diabetes, gastric bypass surgery, or multifetal pregnancies from the analysis. After implementation of uniform clinical and laboratory guidelines, a number of clusters were randomised to intervention (switch to WHO-2013 GDM criteria) each month from February to November 2018. The primary outcome was large for gestational age (LGA, defined as birth weight >90th percentile). Other secondary and prespecified outcomes included maternal and neonatal birth complications. Primary analysis was by modified intention to treat (mITT), excluding 3 clusters that were randomised before study start but were unable to implement the intervention. Prespecified subgroup analysis was undertaken among those discordant for the definition of GDM. Multilevel mixed regression models were used to compare outcome LGA between WHO-2013 and SWE-GDM groups adjusted for clusters, time periods, and potential confounders. Multiple imputation was used for missing potential confounding variables. In the mITT analysis, 47 080 pregnancies were included with 6 882 (14.6%) oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) performed. The GDM prevalence increased from 595/22 797 (2.6%) to 1 591/24 283 (6.6%) after the intervention. In the mITT population, the switch was associated with no change in primary outcome LGA (2 790/24 209 (11.5%) versus 2 584/22 707 (11.4%)) producing an adjusted risk ratio (aRR) of 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.02, p = 0.26). In the subgroup, the prevalence of LGA was 273/956 (28.8%) before and 278/1 239 (22.5%) after the switch, aRR 0.87 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.01, p = 0.076). No serious events were reported. Potential limitations of this trial are mainly due to the trial design, including failure to adhere to guidelines within and between the clusters and influences of unidentified temporal variations. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, implementing the WHO-2013 criteria in Sweden with risk factor-based screening did not significantly reduce LGA prevalence defined as birth weight >90th percentile, in the total population, or in the subgroup discordant for the definition of GDM. Future studies are needed to evaluate the effects of treating different glucose thresholds during pregnancy in different populations, with different screening strategies and clinical management guidelines, to optimise women's and children's health in the short and long term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ISRCTN (41918550).

Diagnosis and Treatment of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Gestational Diabetes.

Hyperglycemia in pregnancy due to pre-existing Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is rising globally with increasing rates of risk factors for metabolic disease. This review summarizes current evidence and recommendations from national and international guidelines for diagnosis and management of T2DM and GDM to optimize maternal and neonatal outcomes.

A framework to classify gestational diabetes diagnosed by routine antenatal 75g glucose tolerance testing.

OBJECTIVE: To create an objective framework to classify gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed by routine antenatal 75 g diabetes testing results to provide an alternative to current treatment-based classification. METHODS: A framework was created to classify gestational diabetes according to the severity of glycemic abnormalities after routine antenatal 75 g GTT (classes 1 through 4, determined by fasting and post-test glycemic abnormalities). A retrospective cohort chart review was used to correlate clinically how often diet therapy alone maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy in each class. Chi-square analysis was used to assess inter-class differences in the success of diet therapy alone maintaining glycemic targets throughout pregnancy. RESULTS: Seventy-four of 228 (33%), 35/228 (15%), 76/228 (33%), and 43/228 (19%) of the study population were classified as Class 1, 2, 3, or 4, respectively. Of eighty-nine patients who maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy with diet alone 51/89 (57%) were Class 1, 20/89 (22.5%) were Class 2, 11/89 (12.5%) were Class 3, and 7/89 (8%) were Class 4. Chi-square analysis showed statistically significant inter-class differences in the likelihood of diet therapy alone maintaining glycemic targets throughout pregnancy. CONCLUSION: In this framework classifying gestational diabetes according to the severity of glycemic abnormalities after routine antenatal 75 g GTT (an objective proxy for disease severity), the higher the assigned class, the less likely that diet therapy alone maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy (a clinical proxy for disease severity).

Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio in the early second trimester is a predictor of gestational diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio (NMR), and other hemogram-derived inflammatory parameters measured in the early second trimester and their association with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: This case-control study was conducted with 105 women with GDM and 205 healthy pregnant women, matched for maternal age at a 1:2 ratio with the cases at two regional maternity hospitals between January 2021 and August 2022. The inflammatory blood cell indices were tested in the early second trimester, and the patient's characteristics and the course of the pregnancy were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between hematological parameters and the risk of GDM. Data were analyzed using SPSS, version 25.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). RESULTS: The final analysis included 310 pregnant women. The GDM group showed a higher pre-pregnancy BMI compared to the healthy controls (p < .01). There was no difference in NMR, PLR, and NLR between the groups (p = .63, .54, and .39, respectively). GDM was only positively associated with MLR (p = .02). After adjusting for potential confounding risk factors including maternal age, parity, and BMI, the multivariate regression analysis showed a higher level of MLR, with a cutoff point of 0.312, was independently associated with the risk of GDM (OR = 2.15, 95%CI 1.51-4.31, p = .03). However, ROC analysis showed that the AUC value of MLR was poor (0.670). CONCLUSIONS: We found that MLR, an inflammatory combined index derived from whole blood counts, may potentially serve as a predictor of GDM in the early second trimester.

Postpartum Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Dual Center Experience.

OBJECTIVE: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is known to be a predisposing factor in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus in affected mothers and their offspring. Current guidelines recommend a two-hour postpartum glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in patients with a history of GDM. However, compliance rates for ordering and completion has been reported as suboptimal. The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impact on healthcare systems, requiring the adaptation of novel strategies to manage patients. So far, there is a paucity of data on how this impacts compliance rates for the oral glucose tolerance test. We aimed to compare the compliance rate and impact of the pandemic on OGTT ordering and completion between a women's hospital and a community health center. METHODS: A dual center retrospective cohort study was carried out to compare the compliance for ordering and completion of the two-hour postpartum OGTT in women diagnosed with GDM between a women's hospital and community health center two years pre-COVID-19 (2018-2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021). RESULTS: 2569 pregnancies were included during these time periods. Prior to the pandemic, the test ordering compliance at the women hospital was 30.2% vs 79.3% for the community health center. During the pandemic, the test ordering compliance at the women's hospital dropped to 24.8%, while it remained steady at the community center (80.8%). Correspondingly, there was a drop in test completion compliance rate at both centers during the pandemic when compared to rate before the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of GDM increased during the pandemic, which may be attributed to factors like sedentary lifestyles, and restructuring of care models, among others. There was increased test ordering and test completion compliance at the community health center compared to the women's hospital, which can be attributed to routine follow-ups and other factors.

Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Universal screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus increased almost 30% in many countries, including underdeveloped countries and same in Nepal. Hospital-based studies in Nepal reported Gestational Diabetes Mellitus cases, with prevalence 2.48% in 2010 to 4.47% in 2019 emphasising on necessity of universal screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. METHODS: As part of implementation of Electronic Decision support System for Antenatal Care, in formative study clinical vignettes on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus case presented to six healthcare providers ( Incharges, Auxiliary Nurse, Midwives and Lab Assistants) from 3 primary healthcare facilities in Kavre and Dolakha districts, Nepal from October-December 2019. 19 Auxiliary Nurse, Midwives from 19 HCF of 4 districts (Kavre, Dolakha, Sindhuli, and Sindhupalchok, including where clinical vignette were applied trained to perform Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for 4 hours. In-depth Interviews conducted with 16 Auxiliary Nurse, Midwives (8 trained and 8 peer coached from selected 4 HCF to explore their perception and experiences of conducting Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and continuing it for future. Clinical vigenttes compared with PEN protocol and IDIs analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Only 4/6 HCPs made probable diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. 217 Oral Glucose Tolerance Test performed, 24 found to have Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. In-depth Interviews showed Auxiliary Nurse, Midwives enthusiasts on implementing tests for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and to continue what has been learnt in training. Some challenges; clients hesitate to stay 2 hours at facilities due to unavailability of transport and household work. Oral Glucose Tolerance Test trained Auxiliary Nurse, Midwives seem more confident in counselling and conducting Oral Glucose Tolerance Test than those peer coached. CONCLUSIONS: Administering Oral Glucose Tolerance Test seemed feasible in HCF settings despite some challenges. Training and continuing logistics supply from municipality level seems promising.

Validation of the Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Knowledge Questionnaire (GDMKQ) among Filipino Patients in a Tertiary Medical Center.

Objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication with adverse fetal and maternal outcomes. Currently, there are only a few validated tools available that address knowledge in GDM. Recognition of the inconsistencies will provide an effective learning program to achieve optimal results. This study aimed at validating the "Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Knowledge Questionnaire" (GDMKQ). Methodology: A cross-sectional validation study on GDMKQ among 51 GDM patients aged at least 18 years was conducted in the outpatient clinics of a tertiary hospital. Excluded were those with pre-existing diabetes. The questionnaire was submitted for peer review for translation to Filipino and back-translation. Concurrent validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire were undertaken as part of the validation process. Descriptive analysis was used for data elaboration by using SPSS v23. Results: The Filipino version of GDMKQ demonstrated sensible content and face validity. As measured, respondents obtained higher total and domain scores with better knowledge levels of GDM compared to its English version. Overall adequate knowledge was observed among those married and college subgroups as compared to single women and those with secondary levels of education. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated at 0.632 using the Kuder-Richardson 20. The test-retest scores using the Filipino-translated questionnaire have a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.853 with moderate to good level of agreement with each other, and Cohen's kappa of 0.564 with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.828. Conclusion: The Filipino-translated version of GDMKQ is a valid screening tool that assesses a patient's knowledge on gestational diabetes. Identifying the level of their understanding will enable clinicians to develop an individualized, effective learning program to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Non-Targeted Metabolomics Analysis of Mother and Infant in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Neonatal Clinical Characterization.

BACKGROUND: The goal was to analyze serums of GDM patients and healthy pregnant women using HPLC-MS and preliminarily screen differential metabolites by metabolomics. METHOD: Sixty pregnant women who underwent elective cesarean section at term in Dongguan Dalang Hospital from January 2023 to April 2023 were selected and divided into the GDM group and healthy pregnancy group. Pre-pregnancy and pregnancy examination information, such as age, BMI, OGTT results, triglyceride, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and other clinical data were col-lected for statistical analysis. Non-targeted metabolomics of serum from 30 GDM patients and 30 healthy pregnant women were studied by HPLC-MS, and different ions were searched. The structures of differential metabolites were identified by HMDB database. The metabolic pathways of differential metabolites were analyzed by KEGG database. RESULTS: The OGTT result, pCO2, pO2, HCO3, BE, Apgar score, and bilirubin levels in the GDM group were higher than those in the healthy pregnancy group (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in age, triglyceride, total cholesterol, newborn birth weight, newborn birth blood glucose, and blood gas pH between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Using p < 0.05 as the screening standard, 55 differential metabolites were identified in serum, mainly including fatty acyl, carboxylic acids and their derivatives, steroids and their derivatives, ketoacids and their derivatives, and pyrimidine nucleosides, etc., all of which were up-regulated or down-regulated to varying degrees. The 55 metabolites were mainly involved in the metabolism of pyrimidine, pyruvate, alanine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, and arachidonic acid, glycolysis, and biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids. CONCLUSIONS: The discovery of these metabolites provides a theoretical basis for an indepth understanding of GDM pathogenesis. Non-targeted metabonomics analysis of blood metabonomics research technology has shown great potential value in the early diagnosis of obstetric diseases and the study of disease mechanisms.

Fetal abdominal obesity in women with one value abnormality on diagnostic test for gestational diabetes mellitus.

Previous studies have shown that fetal abdominal obesity (FAO) was already observed at the time of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis and persisted until delivery despite management in older and/or obese women. In this study, we investigated whether fetuses of women with milder hyperglycemia than GDM have accelerated abdominal growth, leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 7,569 singleton pregnant women who were universally screened using a 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) and underwent a 3-h 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) if GCT result was ≥140mg/dL. GDM, one value abnormality (OVA), and normal glucose tolerance (NGT, NGT1: GCT negative, NGT2: GCT positive & OGTT negative) were diagnosed using Carpenter-Coustan criteria. With fetal biometry data measured simultaneously with 50-g GCT, relative fetal abdominal overgrowth was investigated by assessing the fetal abdominal overgrowth ratios (FAORs) of the ultrasonographically estimated gestational age (GA) of abdominal circumference(AC) per actual GA by the last menstruation period(LMP), biparietal diameter(BPD) or femur length(FL), respectively. FAO was defined as FAOR ≥90th percentile The FAORs of GA-AC/GA-LMP and GA-AC/GA-BPD were significantly higher in OVA subjects compared to NGT subjects but not in NGT2 subjects. Although the frequency of FAO in OVA (12.1%) was between that of NGT (9.6%) and GDM (18.3%) without statistically significant difference, the prevalence of large for gestational age at birth and primary cesarean delivery rates were significantly higher in OVA (9.8% and 29.7%) than in NGT (5.1% and 21.5%, p<0.05). Particularly, among OVA subjects with FAO, the prevalence (33.3% and 66.7%) was significantly higher than in those without FAO (9.7% and 24.2%, p<0.05). The degree of fetal abdominal growth acceleration in OVA subjects was intermediate between that of NGT and GDM subjects. OVA subjects with FAO at the time of GDM diagnosis were strongly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Detection of Hanseniaspora opuntiae in anovaginal samples of pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil-a case report.

In this study, we report the first isolation of Hanseniaspora opuntiae obtained from four pregnant women in Brazil. Clinical isolates were obtained from four samples taken between 35 and 37 gestational weeks, as part of the routine antenatal care for maternal colonization screening for Streptococcus agalactiae group B. The patients were immunocompetent, with two of them diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus. Species identification was performed by MALDI-TOF MS and rDNA sequencing. While Hanseniaspora species have not traditionally been considered a typical opportunist pathogen, our findings emphasize the importance of investigating and screening for Hanseniaspora in pregnant populations, highlighting H. opuntiae as a potential agent of human infections.

First Trimester Placental Biomarkers for Pregnancy Outcomes.

The placenta plays a key role in several adverse obstetrical outcomes, such as preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction and gestational diabetes mellitus. The early identification of at-risk pregnancies could significantly improve the management, therapy and prognosis of these pregnancies, especially if these at-risk pregnancies are identified in the first trimester. The aim of this review was to summarize the possible biomarkers that can be used to diagnose early placental dysfunction and, consequently, at-risk pregnancies. We divided the biomarkers into proteins and non-proteins. Among the protein biomarkers, some are already used in clinical practice, such as the sFLT1/PLGF ratio or PAPP-A; others are not yet validated, such as HTRA1, Gal-3 and CD93. In the literature, many studies analyzed the role of several protein biomarkers, but their results are contrasting. On the other hand, some non-protein biomarkers, such as miR-125b, miR-518b and miR-628-3p, seem to be linked to an increased risk of complicated pregnancy. Thus, a first trimester heterogeneous biomarkers panel containing protein and non-protein biomarkers may be more appropriate to identify and discriminate several complications that can affect pregnancies.

Association of congenital heart defects (CHD) with factors related to maternal health and pregnancy in newborns in Puerto Rico.

Background: Given the pervasive issues of obesity and diabetes both in Puerto Rico and the broader United States, there is a compelling need to investigate the intricate interplay among BMI, pregestational, and gestational maternal diabetes, and their potential impact on the occurrence of congenital heart defects (CHD) during neonatal development. Methods: Using the comprehensive System of Vigilance and Surveillance of Congenital Defects in Puerto Rico, we conducted a focused analysis on neonates diagnosed with CHD between 2016 and 2020. Our assessment encompassed a range of variables, including maternal age, gestational age, BMI, pregestational diabetes, gestational diabetes, hypertension, history of abortion, and presence of preeclampsia. Results: A cohort of 673 patients was included in our study. The average maternal age was 26 years, within a range of 22 to 32 years. The mean gestational age measured 39 weeks, with a median span of 38 to 39 weeks. Of the 673 patients, 274 (41%) mothers gave birth to neonates diagnosed with CHD. Within this group, 22 cases were linked to pre-gestational diabetes, while 202 were not; 20 instances were associated with gestational diabetes, compared to 200 without; and 148 cases exhibited an overweight or obese BMI, whereas 126 displayed a normal BMI. Conclusion: We identified a statistically significant correlation between pre-gestational diabetes mellitus and the occurrence of CHD. However, our analysis did not show a statistically significant association between maternal BMI and the likelihood of CHD. These results may aid in developing effective strategies to prevent and manage CHD in neonates.

Real-time predictive model of extrauterine growth retardation in preterm infants with gestational age less than 32 weeks.

The aim of this study was to develop a real-time risk prediction model for extrauterine growth retardation (EUGR). A total of 2514 very preterm infants were allocated into a training set and an external validation set. The most appropriate independent variables were screened using univariate analysis and Lasso regression with tenfold cross-validation, while the prediction model was designed using binary multivariate logistic regression. A visualization of the risk variables was created using a nomogram, while the calibration plot and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to calibrate the prediction model. Clinical efficacy was assessed using the decision curve analysis (DCA) curves. Eight optimal predictors that namely birth weight, small for gestation age (SGA), hypertensive disease complicating pregnancy (HDCP), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), multiple births, cumulative duration of fasting, growth velocity and postnatal corticosteroids were introduced into the logistic regression equation to construct the EUGR prediction model. The area under the ROC curve of the training set and the external verification set was 83.1% and 84.6%, respectively. The calibration curve indicate that the model fits well. The DCA curve shows that the risk threshold for clinical application is 0-95% in both set. Introducing Birth weight, SGA, HDCP, GDM, Multiple births, Cumulative duration of fasting, Growth velocity and Postnatal corticosteroids into the nomogram increased its usefulness for predicting EUGR risk in very preterm infants.

Early pregnancy HbA1c as the first screening test for gestational diabetes: results from three prospective cohorts.

BACKGROUND: More than 90% of gestational diabetes cases are estimated to occur in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Most current guidelines recommend an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-28 weeks of gestation. The OGTT is burdensome, especially in LMICs, resulting in a high proportion of women not being screened. We aimed to develop a simple and effective screening strategy for gestational diabetes. METHODS: STRiDE, a prospective cohort study, was set up in seven centres in south India and seven centres in western Kenya, and included pregnant women aged 18-50 years of age and at less than 16 weeks of gestation (<20 weeks in Kenya), confirmed by dating ultrasound. We assessed the efficacy of early pregnancy HbA1c (venous and capillary point-of-care), either alone or as part of a composite risk score with age, BMI, and family history of diabetes, in predicting gestational diabetes at 24-28 weeks of gestation, in two LMICs (India and Kenya) and in a UK multi-ethnic population from the PRiDE study. A key secondary outcome was to assess whether an early pregnancy composite risk score can reduce the need for OGTTs. Gestational diabetes was diagnosed using current WHO criteria. FINDINGS: Between Feb 15, 2016, Dec 13, 2019, we enrolled 3070 participants in India and 4104 in Kenya. 4320 participants were included from the PRiDE cohort. Gestational diabetes prevalence by OGTT at 24-28 weeks was 19·2% in India, 3·0% in Kenya, and 14·5% in the UK. Early pregnancy HbA1c was independently associated with incidence of gestational diabetes at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Adjusted risk ratios were 1·60 (95% CI 1·19-2·16) in India, 3·49 (2·8-4·34) in Kenya, and 4·72 (3·82-5·82) in the UK. Composite risk score models that combined venous or point-of-care HbA1c with age, BMI, and family history of diabetes best predicted testing positive for gestational diabetes. A population-specific, two-threshold screening strategy of rule-in and rule-out gestational diabetes using early pregnancy composite risk score could reduce the requirement of OGTTs by 50-64%. For the HbA1c-alone model, the thresholds were 5·4% (rule in) and 4·9% (rule out) in India, 6·0% (rule in) and 5·2% (rule out) in Kenya, and 5·6% (rule in) and 5·2% (rule out) in the UK. INTERPRETATION: Early pregnancy HbA1c offers a simple screening test for gestational diabetes, allowing those at highest risk to receive early intervention and greatly reduce the need for OGTTs. This can also be carried out using point-of-care HbA1c in LMICs. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council and the Indian Department of Biotechnology.