Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 835
Filter
1.
Int Wound J ; 21(9): e70039, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39268931

ABSTRACT

To identify the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, reinfection and clinical outcomes. Four hundred forty-six patients that were admitted to the hospital with moderate or severe foot infections were retrospectively reviewed. Tissue and bone cultures were obtained from the index hospital admission. Conversion was defined as methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in the first culture and subsequently MRSA when there was a reinfection. The incidence of MRSA was 7.8% (n = 35), with no significant difference between soft tissue infections (7.7%) and osteomyelitis (8.0%). MRSA incidence was 9.4 times higher in non-diabetics (23.8% vs. 3.2%, p = <0.01). The incidence of reinfection was 40.8% (n = 182). Conversion to MRSA was seen in 2.2% (n = 4) total, occurring in 5.4%. Non-diabetics were 20.1 times more likely to have MRSA reinfection than people with diabetes (28.6% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001). MRSA patients had a higher proportion of healed wounds (82.4% vs. 69.3%, p = 0.02). There were no differences in other clinical outcomes in MRSA vs. other infections in reinfection (28.6% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.11), amputation (48.6% vs. 52.0%, p = 0.69) or hospitalization (28.6% vs. 42.6, p = 0.11). The incidence of MRSA for the first infection (7.8%), reinfection (6.0%) and conversion to MRSA (2.2%) was low. MRSA was 9.4 times more common in people without diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections , Humans , Male , Female , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Aged , Incidence , Adult , Osteomyelitis/microbiology , Osteomyelitis/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Reinfection/epidemiology , Reinfection/microbiology , Soft Tissue Infections/microbiology , Soft Tissue Infections/epidemiology
2.
Nutr Diabetes ; 14(1): 71, 2024 09 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39223127

ABSTRACT

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is globally recognized as a significant health concern, with diabetic foot (DF) identified as a severe long-term complication that can lead to tissue death or amputation. The discovery of the impact of mycobiota, a diverse group of multicellular eukaryotes in the gut microbiome, on the onset of endocrine disorders holds great significance. Therefore, this research aimed to examine variations in fungal mycobiome and identify potential biomarkers for T2DM and T2DM-DF. Fecal and blood samples were collected from 33 individuals with T2DM, 32 individuals with T2DM-DF, and 32 healthy individuals without any health conditions (HC). Blood samples were used for laboratory parameters analysis, while total DNA was extracted from fecal samples and sequenced using Illumina 18s rRNA. Bioinformatics tools were employed to analyze fungal abundance and diversity, revealing differentially expressed fungal species and signature fungi that distinguished between T2DM, T2DM-DF, and HC groups. Firstly, significant alterations in some laboratory parameters were observed among the three groups, which also differed between T2DM and T2DM-DF. The diversity of gut fungi in T2DM and T2DM-DF significantly differed from that of the HC group; however, more pronounced changes were observed in T2DM-DF. Additionally, two significantly altered phyla, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, were identified with higher Ascomycota abundance but lower Basidiomycota abundance in both the T2DM and T2DM-DF compared to the HC group. Furthermore, the top 15 fungi showing significant changes at the species level included a notable decrease in Rhodotorula_mucilaginosa abundance in patients with T2DM compared to HC and a substantial increase in unclassified_g_Candida abundance specifically seen only among patients with T2DM-DF, but not among those diagnosed with T2DM or HC. Thirdly, KEGG was employed to analyze enzyme expression across the three groups, revealing a more pronounced alteration in gut fungal function within T2DM-DF compared to T2DM. Subsequently, to accurately identify signature fungi in each group, a random forest was utilized to rank the top 15 significant fungi. Notably, 11 fungi were identified as potential biomarkers for distinguishing T2DM or T2DM-DF from HC, while eight fungi could discriminate between T2DM and T2DM-DF. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated enhanced accuracy of predicted outcomes. These findings suggest that changes in fungal mycobiome are closely associated with the progression and complications of T2DM and DF, offering promising prospects for diagnosis and treatment.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Foot , Dysbiosis , Feces , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Mycobiome , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/microbiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Middle Aged , Female , Male , Dysbiosis/microbiology , Dysbiosis/diagnosis , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Biomarkers/blood , Feces/microbiology , Aged , Adult , Ascomycota , Basidiomycota , Case-Control Studies , Fungi/isolation & purification
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 791, 2024 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39107703

ABSTRACT

Diabetic foot infection imposes a significant burden and is the major cause of nontraumatic limb amputation. Adequate patient management with effective antibiotic therapy is crucial.This retrospective cohort study aimed to characterize the microbiology and resistance patterns of moderate to severe neuropathic diabetic foot infection in patients hospitalized at a tertiary referral hospital between January 2020 and June 2023. Deep tissue specimens from ulcers were collected for culture.Sixty inpatients were included (62% male, mean age 59.1 ± 11.5 years). Osteomyelitis was present in 90% of the patients. Among 102 microorganisms (average of 1.91 ± 1.25 pathogens per patient), 60.8% were gram-positive bacteria, 31.4% were gram-negative, 3.92% were anaerobic bacteria, and 3.92% were fungi. Staphylococcus aureus (19%) and Enterococcus faecium (17%) were the most common. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8%) and bacteria of the Enterobacterales family (24%) accounted for all the isolated gram-negative bacteria. Sixteen percent of Staphylococcus aureus and 67% of coagulase-negative Staphylococci were resistant to methicillin. Resistance to ampicillin was found in 11% of Enterococci. All Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were sensitive to piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, or cefepime. Among the Enterobacterales, resistance rates were 35% for piperacillin-tazobactam, 38% for ceftazidime, 21% for cefepime, and 13% for carbapenems.Although the prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci was lower than that in other studies, carbapenem resistance among gram-negative bacteria warrants attention. This study highlights the importance of understanding local epidemiology for effective diabetic foot infection management and resistance mitigation.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Diabetic Foot , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Female , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Portugal/epidemiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Osteomyelitis/microbiology , Osteomyelitis/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Negative Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacteria/genetics , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/classification
4.
J Wound Care ; 33(8): 554-559, 2024 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39149927

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a marine omega fatty acid-containing multimodal wound matrix (MWM) in reducing bacterial contamination and supporting wound area reduction (WAR) in patients with hard-to-heal wounds of varying aetiologies. METHOD: A prospective, single-site, pilot case series of patients with hard-to-heal wounds. All wounds were considered non-healing prior to inclusion as they had failed to achieve at least 50% WAR after at least four weeks of standard of care (SoC) treatments. Patients were seen once weekly for wound assessments, matrix application and dressing changes. Baseline and weekly fluorescence images, standard wound images and wound measurements were obtained. RESULTS: A total of three patients, two with venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and one with a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) were enrolled in this pilot study. The mean baseline wound age prior to study enrolment was 24 weeks, with a mean baseline wound size of 8.61cm2. The two VLUs went on to complete closure. The DFU displayed a total WAR of 53% by six weeks, when the patient was lost to follow-up due to a geographical relocation. The mean percentage area reduction of all wounds combined was 82% upon study completion. CONCLUSION: The use of MWM proved to be effective and safe in this patient cohort. The wounds included in this case series failed to enter a healing trajectory with SoC wound therapies. The MWM supported wound closure and reduced bacterial loads in this patient cohort.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot , Varicose Ulcer , Wound Healing , Humans , Pilot Projects , Male , Female , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Prospective Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Varicose Ulcer/therapy , Varicose Ulcer/microbiology , Leg Ulcer/microbiology , Leg Ulcer/therapy , Wound Infection/drug therapy , Wound Infection/microbiology , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome
5.
Curr Microbiol ; 81(9): 295, 2024 Aug 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39096343

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is considered as one of the challenging ulcer infections in diabetic patients especially those who have acquired antibiotic-resistant infections. Nanotechnology products have enormous potential to treat diseases including infectious diseases. As chitosan and zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (NPs) have harbored a high antimicrobial effect, this survey was aimed to synthesize chitosan, ZnO, and ZnO-Urtica. diocia (ZnO-U. diocia) NPs, and to assess their antimicrobial effects and their influence on virulence genes expression in S. aureus isolates from diabetic ulcers. The antibacterial effect of NPs was detected by microdilution method. The most frequently components in U. diocia aqueous extract were linalool,4-thujanol, camphor, carvacrol, propanedioic acid, and di(butyl) phthalate. More than 95% of clinical S. aureus isolates were resistant to several antibiotics including erythromycin, cefoxitin, clindamycin, and ciprofloxacin. The most resistant isolates were S. aureus ATDS 52, ATDS 53, F5232, and F91. The lowest MIC and MBC by the NPs on the isolates was detected as 0.128 g/mL and 0.178 g/mL, respectively. A significant decrease of 90% in the expression rates of lukED and RNAIII genes was reported for S. aureus isolates treated with the NPs. The synthetized ZnO-U. diocia and chitosan NPs can be proposed as a reliable and effective antimicrobial agent targeting diabetic ulcers infections caused by S. aureus because of its high effects on the bacterial growth and virulence genes expression.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Chitosan , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Staphylococcus aureus , Urtica dioica , Zinc Oxide , Chitosan/pharmacology , Zinc Oxide/pharmacology , Zinc Oxide/chemistry , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Humans , Urtica dioica/chemistry , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Diabetes Complications/microbiology
6.
S Afr Med J ; 114(6): e1131, 2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39041506

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot syndrome is defined as the presence of a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) associated with neuropathy, peripheral artery disease and infection. While the use of antimicrobials in the treatment of DFU infection remains a mainstay, the choice of antimicrobial remains problematic owing to the presence of multidrug-resistant polymicrobial infections. In the South African public healthcare sector, the treatment of DFUs is based on the Standard Treatment Guidelines (STGs) and the Essential Drug List. These guidelines are developed using evidence-based medicine and are based on global susceptibility patterns rather than local susceptibility data, and may not provide the most appropriate treatment options. OBJECTIVES: To determine the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of DFUs isolated from patients visiting selected Gauteng provincial public hospitals in order to determine a clinically effective treatment protocol for the management of these infections. METHODS: Sample swabs were taken from 51 DFUs using the Levine method. Each sample swab was spread onto blood agar plates, and thereafter individual pathogens were isolated. The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of all isolated pathogens were determined using zone of inhibition measurements. Pathogens were grouped according to macromorphological characteristics as well as susceptibility patterns, and a representative isolate from each group was then identified. RESULTS: A total of 51 DFU ulcer swabs from 45 patients were included in the study. From the sample swabs, a total of 445 pathogens were isolated. The most effective antimicrobial was found to be gentamicin, followed by ciprofloxacin. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, the first-line treatment according to the STGs, was found to be ineffective for many of the isolated pathogens. The most commonly isolated pathogens were Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate the urgent need to reassess the STGs and base treatment plans on local epidemiological data. This study provides valuable data on common causative pathogens in DFU infections, as well as the resistance patterns of these pathogens, forming a baseline on which to base future DFU treatment plans.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Diabetic Foot , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Humans , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , South Africa/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Public Sector , Aged
7.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1368046, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39010897

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Pathogens causing diabetic foot infections (DFIs) vary by region globally; however, knowledge of the causative organism is essential for effective empirical treatment. We aimed to determine the incidence and antibiotic susceptibility of DFI pathogens worldwide, focusing on Asia and China. Methods: Through a comprehensive literature search, we identified published studies on organisms isolated from DFI wounds from January 2000 to December 2020. Results: Based on our inclusion criteria, we analyzed 245 studies that cumulatively reported 38,744 patients and 41,427 isolated microorganisms. DFI pathogens varied according to time and region. Over time, the incidence of Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic bacteria have decreased and increased, respectively. America and Asia have the highest (62.74%) and lowest (44.82%) incidence of Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. Africa has the highest incidence (26.90%) of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Asia has the highest incidence (49.36%) of Gram-negative aerobic bacteria with species infection rates as follows: Escherichia coli, 10.77%; Enterobacter spp., 3.95%; and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 11.08%, with higher local rates in China and Southeast Asia. Linezolid, vancomycin, and teicoplanin were the most active agents against Gram-positive aerobes, while imipenem and cefoperazone-sulbactam were the most active agents against Gram-negative aerobes. Discussion: This systematic review showed that over 20 years, the pathogens causing DFIs varied considerably over time and region. This data may inform local clinical guidelines on empirical antibiotic therapy for DFI in China and globally. Regular large-scale epidemiological studies are necessary to identify trends in DFI pathogenic bacteria. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023447645.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Diabetic Foot , Humans , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Incidence , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy
8.
J Med Microbiol ; 73(7)2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963417

ABSTRACT

Background. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an invasive organism that frequently causes severe tissue damage in diabetic foot ulcers.Gap statement. The characterisation of P. aeruginosa strains isolated from diabetic foot infections has not been carried out in Tunisia.Purpose. The aim was to determine the prevalence of P. aeruginosa isolated from patients with diabetic foot infections (DFIs) in Tunisia and to characterize their resistance, virulence and molecular typing.Methods. Patients with DFIs admitted to the diabetes department of the International Hospital Centre of Tunisia, from September 2019 to April 2021, were included in this prospective study. P. aeruginosa were obtained from the wound swabs, aspiration and soft tissue biopsies during routine clinical care and were confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, serotyping, integron and OprD characterization, virulence, biofilm production, pigment quantification, elastase activity and molecular typing were analysed in all recovered P. aeruginosa isolates by phenotypic tests, specific PCRs, sequencing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing.Results. Sixteen P. aeruginosa isolates (16.3 %) were recovered from 98 samples of 78 diabetic patients and were classified into 6 serotypes (O:11 the most frequent), 11 different PFGE patterns and 10 sequence types (three of them new ones). The high-risk clone ST235 was found in two isolates. The highest resistance percentages were observed to netilmicin (69 %) and cefepime (43.8 %). Four multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates (25 %) were detected, three of them being carbapenem-resistant. The ST235-MDR strain harboured the In51 class 1 integron (intI1 +aadA6+orfD+qacED1-sul1). According to the detection of 14 genes involved in virulence or quorum sensing, 5 virulotypes were observed, including 5 exoU-positive, 9 exoS-positive and 2 exoU/exoS-positive strains. The lasR gene was truncated by ISPpu21 insertion sequence in one isolate, and a deletion of 64 bp in the rhlR gene was detected in the ST235-MDR strain. Low biofilm, pyoverdine and elastase production were detected in all P. aeruginosa; however, the lasR-truncated strain showed a chronic infection phenotype characterized by loss of serotype-specific antigenicity, high production of phenazines and high biofilm formation.Conclusions. Our study demonstrated for the first time the prevalence and the molecular characterization of P. aeruginosa strains from DFIs in Tunisia, showing a high genetic diversity, moderate antimicrobial resistance, but a high number of virulence-related traits, highlighting their pathological importance.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Diabetic Foot , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pseudomonas Infections , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Humans , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genetics , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/classification , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/pathogenicity , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Tunisia/epidemiology , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas Infections/epidemiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Prospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Biofilms/growth & development , Virulence/genetics , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Adult , Virulence Factors/genetics , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Aged, 80 and over , Prevalence
9.
West Afr J Med ; 41(4): 363-371, 2024 04 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39002161

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the nail unit and one of the common nail diseases that occurs commonly in diabetic patients. It poses a threat of diabetic foot complications to diabetics and negatively affects the quality of life of the patients. OBJECTIVES: The overall aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and clinical features of onychomycosis in diabetics, as well as the spectrum of causative fungi in Nigeria as compared with age and sex-matched controls. METHODOLOGY: This was a hospital-based, comparative cross-sectional study. One hundred and fifty consecutive adult diabetics and 150 healthy controls (accompanied persons and staff) matched for age and sex were recruited from the Diabetic Clinics and the Dermatology Clinic of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla. The participants were interviewed using a pre-tested structured questionnaire, nail scrapings were collected for fungal studies, and clippings for nail histopathology using Periodic Acid Schiff. RESULTS: The prevalence of onychomycosis among DM subjects was 45.3% vs. 35.3% in controls, which was not statistically significant (P value 0.078). Distal-lateral subungual onychomycosis was the most common clinical type in both study groups and presented mainly with nail discolouration, onycholysis, and subungual hyperkeratosis. The most common fungi isolated were dermatophytes (Trichophyton soudanense), non-dermatophytes (Aspergillus spp.), and Candida species (Candida albicans). CONCLUSION: Onychomycosis in diabetics is a very common nail disorder in the South-Eastern part of Nigeria with a high prevalence. The presence of foot ulcers was associated with onychomycosis in diabetics, and they were more likely to have non-dermatophytic onychomycosis.


INTRODUCTION: L'onychomycose est une infection fongique de l'unité de l'ongle et l'une des maladies des ongles les plus courantes chez les patients diabétiques. Elle pose une menace de complications du pied diabétique et affecte négativement la qualité de vie des patients. OBJECTIFS: L'objectif général de l'étude était de déterminer la prévalence et les caractéristiques cliniques de l'onychomycose chez les diabétiques, ainsi que le spectre des champignons causaux au Nigeria par rapport à un groupe témoin apparié selon l'âge et le sexe. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Il s'agissait d'une étude transversale comparative réalisée en milieu hospitalier. Cent cinquante diabétiques adultes consécutifs et 150 témoins sains (personnes accompagnatrices et personnel) appariés selon l'âge et le sexe ont été recrutés dans les cliniques de diabète et la clinique de dermatologie de l'Hôpital Universitaire du Nigeria à Ituku-Ozalla. Les participants ont été interrogés à l'aide d'un questionnaire structuré pré-testé, des échantillons de grattage d'ongles ont été prélevés pour des études fongiques, et des échantillons pour l'histopathologie des ongles utilisant l'acide périodique de Schiff. RÉSULTATS: La prévalence de l'onychomycose chez les sujets atteints de diabète était de 45,3 % contre 35,3 % chez les témoins, ce qui n'était pas statistiquement significatif (valeur de p 0,078). L'onychomycose sousunguéale distale-latérale était le type clinique le plus courant dans les deux groupes d'étude et se manifestait principalement par une décoloration des ongles, une onycholyse et une hyperkératose sousunguéale. Les champignons les plus couramment isolés étaient les dermatophytes (Trichophyton soudanense), les non-dermatophytes (Aspergillus spp.) et les espèces de Candida (Candida albicans). CONCLUSION: L'onychomycose chez les diabétiques est un trouble des ongles très courant dans le sud-est du Nigeria avec une prévalence élevée. La présence d'ulcères du pied était associée à l'onychomycose chez les diabétiques, et ils étaient plus susceptibles de présenter une onychomycose non-dermatophytique. MOTS - CLÉS: Onychomycose, Diabète sucré, Prévalence, Champignons, Nigeria.


Subject(s)
Onychomycosis , Humans , Onychomycosis/epidemiology , Onychomycosis/microbiology , Nigeria/epidemiology , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prevalence , Middle Aged , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Aged , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Foot Dermatoses/epidemiology , Foot Dermatoses/microbiology
10.
Int J Biol Macromol ; 277(Pt 2): 134166, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39084444

ABSTRACT

Superficial skin injuries especially burn injuries and unhealed diabetic foot open wounds remain troubling for public health. The healing process is often interrupted by the invasion of resistant pathogens that results in the failure of conventional procedures outside the clinical settings. Herein, we designed nanofibers dressing with intrinsic antibacterial potential of poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone)-iodine/ poly (vinyl)-alcohol by electrospinning with chitosan encapsulating ceftriaxone (CPC/NFs). The optimized electrospun CPC/NFs exhibited smooth surface morphology with average diameter of 165 ± 7.1 nm, drug entrapment and loading efficiencies of 76.97 ± 4.7 % and 8.32 ± 1.73 %, respectively. The results displayed smooth and uniformed fibers with adequate thermal stability and ensured chemical doping. The enhanced in vitro antibacterial efficacy of CPC/NFs against resistant E. coli isolates and biosafety studies encourage the use of designed nanofibers dressing for burn injuries and diabetic foot injuries. In vivo studies proved the healing power of dressing for burn wounds model and diabetic infected wounds model. Immunofluorescence investigation of the wound tissue also suggested promising healing ability of CPC/NFs. The designed approach would be helpful to treat these infected skin open wounds in the hospitals and outside the clinical settings.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Burns , Ceftriaxone , Chitosan , Diabetic Foot , Nanofibers , Wound Healing , Nanofibers/chemistry , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Chitosan/chemistry , Chitosan/pharmacology , Burns/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Wound Healing/drug effects , Ceftriaxone/pharmacology , Ceftriaxone/chemistry , Povidone-Iodine/pharmacology , Povidone-Iodine/chemistry , Povidone-Iodine/administration & dosage , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Male , Bandages , Mice , Drug Delivery Systems
11.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0299416, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833431

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) in a Peruvian hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients treated in the Diabetic Foot Unit of a General Hospital in Lima, Peru. MDRB was defined by resistance to more than two pharmacological groups across six clinically significant genera. The primary outcome was death due to DFI complications and/or major amputation. Other outcomes included minor amputation, hospitalization, and a hospital stay longer than 14 days. Relative risks were estimated using Poisson regression for all outcomes. RESULTS: The study included 192 DFI patients with a mean age of 59.9 years; 74% were males. A total of 80.8% exhibited MDRB. The primary outcome had an incidence rate of 23.2% and 5.4% in patients with and without MDRB, respectively (p = 0.01). After adjusting for sex, age, bone involvement, severe infection, ischemia, diabetes duration, and glycosylated hemoglobin, MDRB showed no association with the primary outcome (RR 3.29; 95% CI, 0.77-13.9), but did with hospitalization longer than 14 days (RR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.04-1.98). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no association between MDRB and increased mortality and/or major amputation due to DFI complications, but did find a correlation with prolonged hospitalization. The high proportion of MDRB could limit the demonstration of the relationship. It is urgent to apply continuous evaluation of bacterial resistance, implement a rational plan for antibiotic use, and maintain biosafety to confront this threat.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Diabetic Foot , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Peru/epidemiology , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Amputation, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/mortality , Length of Stay , Hospitalization
12.
Sci Adv ; 10(26): eadj2020, 2024 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38924411

ABSTRACT

Chronic wounds are a common and costly complication of diabetes, where multifactorial defects contribute to dysregulated skin repair, inflammation, tissue damage, and infection. We previously showed that aspects of the diabetic foot ulcer microbiota were correlated with poor healing outcomes, but many microbial species recovered remain uninvestigated with respect to wound healing. Here, we focused on Alcaligenes faecalis, a Gram-negative bacterium that is frequently recovered from chronic wounds but rarely causes infection. Treatment of diabetic wounds with A. faecalis accelerated healing during early stages. We investigated the underlying mechanisms and found that A. faecalis treatment promotes reepithelialization of diabetic keratinocytes, a process that is necessary for healing but deficient in chronic wounds. Overexpression of matrix metalloproteinases in diabetes contributes to failed epithelialization, and we found that A. faecalis treatment balances this overexpression to allow proper healing. This work uncovers a mechanism of bacterial-driven wound repair and provides a foundation for the development of microbiota-based wound interventions.


Subject(s)
Alcaligenes faecalis , Keratinocytes , Matrix Metalloproteinases , Wound Healing , Alcaligenes faecalis/metabolism , Animals , Keratinocytes/metabolism , Keratinocytes/microbiology , Humans , Matrix Metalloproteinases/metabolism , Matrix Metalloproteinases/genetics , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/pathology , Diabetic Foot/metabolism , Mice , Re-Epithelialization , Male
13.
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab ; 7(4): e00503, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38924696

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers in developing countries often become infected. The healthcare systems are often not equipped to conduct the culture and the sensitivity tests required for prescribing a targeted antibiotic treatment for diabetic foot infection (DFI). METHODS: We evaluate antibiotic stewardship programmes for DFIs, at every level of health care, with an emphasis on resource-poor settings such as in Africa. RESULTS: The management of DFI very often is adapted to the financial and practical realities of the resource-poor regions. The application of the point-of-care Gram stain of deep tissue samples is efficient, rapid, low cost and ubiquitously available. Upon the identification of the predominant pathogen in the Gram stain, a semi-quantitative preemptive antibiotic treatment can be started in accordance with the World Health Organization Aware, Watch and Restrict Essential Medicine List. This list is catered to every country and is a powerful tool. However, some basic knowledge of the local microbiological epidemiology is necessary to choose the most appropriate agent. We report our experience on using the rapidly available Gram stain for narrowing the preemptive choice of listed antibiotic agents, as an economic tool for antibiotic stewardship in DFIs. CONCLUSIONS: In the practical and resource-saving management of DFI, the 'therapeutic' use of Gram stains is not common in resource-rich countries but should be added to the arsenal of the general efforts for antibiotic stewardship.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Developing Countries , Diabetic Foot , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Gentian Violet , Phenazines
14.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 37(4): 356-359, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38864830

ABSTRACT

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), and particularly diabetic-related foot infections (DFI), present diagnostic and therapeutic complexities, often leading to severe complications. This study aims to evaluate the in vitro efficacy of cefditoren and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid against typical DFI pathogens. Clinical samples from 40 patients with mild SSTIs were analyzed, revealing a predominance of Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. species. Cefditoren exhibited activity against 90% of isolates, with superior potency over amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. These findings underscore the utility of cefditoren in empirical treatment of DFI, although a larger sample size would be desirable for further validation.


Subject(s)
Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cephalosporins , Diabetic Foot , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Humans , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Streptococcus/drug effects , Soft Tissue Infections/drug therapy , Soft Tissue Infections/microbiology , Male , Female , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Middle Aged
15.
Int Wound J ; 21(6): e14912, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38853665

ABSTRACT

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) often become infected and are treated with antimicrobials, with samples collected to inform care. Swab samples are easier than tissue sampling but report fewer organisms. Compared with culture and sensitivity (C&S) methods, molecular microbiology identifies more organisms. Clinician perspectives on sampling and processing are unknown. We explored clinician perspectives on DFU sampling-tissue samples/wound swabs-and on processing techniques, culture and sensitivity or molecular techniques. The latter provides information on organisms which have not survived transport to the laboratory for culture. We solicited feedback on molecular microbiology reports. Qualitative study using semi-structured interview, with analysis using a Framework approach. CODIFI2 clinicians from UK DFU clinics. Seven consultants agreed to take part. They reported, overall, a preference for tissue samples over swabbing. Clinicians were not confident replacing C&S with molecular microbiology as the approach to reporting was unfamiliar. The study was small and did not recruit any podiatrists or nurses, who may have discipline-specific attitudes or perspectives on DFU care. Both sampling approaches appear to be used by clinicians. Molecular microbiology reports would not be, at present, suitable for replacement of traditional culture and sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot , Qualitative Research , Specimen Handling , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Humans , Specimen Handling/methods , Male , Female , United Kingdom , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Wound Infection/microbiology , Wound Infection/therapy
16.
Clin Microbiol Rev ; 37(3): e0014323, 2024 Sep 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819166

ABSTRACT

SUMMARYDiabetic foot infections (DFI) are a public health problem worldwide. DFI are polymicrobial, biofilm-associated infections involving complex bacterial communities organized in functional equivalent pathogroups, all including anaerobes. Indeed, multiple pathophysiological factors favor the growth of anaerobes in this context. However, the prevalence, role, and contribution of anaerobes in wound evolution remain poorly characterized due to their challenging detection. Studies based on culture reviewed herein showed a weighted average of 17% of patients with anaerobes. Comparatively, the weighted average of patients with anaerobes identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing was 83.8%. Culture largely underestimated not only the presence but also the diversity of anaerobes compared with cultivation-independent approaches but both methods showed that anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci were the most commonly identified in DFI. Anaerobes were more present in deeper lesions, and their detection was associated with fever, malodorous lesions, and ulcer depth and duration. More specifically, initial abundance of Peptoniphilus spp. was associated with ulcer-impaired healing, Fusobacterium spp. detection was significantly correlated with the duration of DFI, and the presence of Bacteroides spp. was significantly associated with amputation. Antimicrobial resistance of anaerobes in DFI remains slightly studied and warrants more consideration in the context of increasing resistance of the most frequently identified anaerobes in DFI. The high rate of patients with DFI-involving anaerobes, the increased knowledge on the species identified, their virulence factors, and their potential role in wound evolution support recommendations combining debridement and antibiotic therapy effective on anaerobes in moderate and severe DFI.


Subject(s)
Bacteria, Anaerobic , Diabetic Foot , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Humans , Bacteria, Anaerobic/pathogenicity , Bacteria, Anaerobic/drug effects , Bacteria, Anaerobic/isolation & purification , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Virulence , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology
17.
Microb Drug Resist ; 30(8): 341-349, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722095

ABSTRACT

The study determined the prevalence, antimicrobial resistant (AMR) determinants, and genetic characteristics of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) in a Tunisian hospital. A total of 26 Escherichia spp. and Klebsiella spp. isolates were recovered and identified by MALDI-TOF-MS. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, the detection of AMR determinants and Shiga-like toxin genes, phylogenetic grouping, and molecular typing were performed. Twelve E. coli, 10 K. pneumoniae, 3 K. oxytoca, and 1 E. hermanii were isolated. A multidrug-resistant phenotype was detected in 65.4% of the isolates. About 30.8% of isolates were extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) producers and mainly carried blaCTX-M-15 and blaCTX-M-14 genes. One blaNDM-1-producing K. pneumoniae-ST1 strain was identified. Class 1 integrons were detected in 11 isolates and 5 gene cassette arrangements were noted: dfrA1+aadA1 (n = 1), dfrA12+aadA2 (n = 3), and dfrA17+aadA5 (n = 1). Other non-ß-lactam resistance genes detected were as follows (number of isolates): aac(3')-II (3), aac(6')-Ib-cr(8), qnrB (2), qnrS (4), cmlA (2), floR (4), sul1 (11), sul2 (11), and sul3 (2). The phylogroup B1 was the most frequent (41.7%) among E. coli, and two ESBL-producing isolates corresponded to the ST131-B2 lineage. The ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in DFIs are described for the first time in Tunisia.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Diabetic Foot , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , beta-Lactamases , Humans , Tunisia/epidemiology , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , beta-Lactamases/genetics , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Hospitals , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Phylogeny
18.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 23(1): 39, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702796

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-surgical chronic wounds, including diabetes-related foot diseases (DRFD), pressure injuries (PIs) and venous leg ulcers (VLU), are common hard-to-heal wounds. Wound evolution partly depends on microbial colonisation or infection, which is often confused by clinicians, thereby hampering proper management. Current routine microbiology investigation of these wounds is based on in vitro culture, focusing only on a limited panel of the most frequently isolated bacteria, leaving a large part of the wound microbiome undocumented. METHODS: A literature search was conducted on original studies published through October 2022 reporting metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) of chronic wound samples. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they applied 16 S rRNA metagenomics or shotgun metagenomics for microbiome analysis or diagnosis. Case reports, prospective, or retrospective studies were included. However, review articles, animal studies, in vitro model optimisation, benchmarking, treatment optimisation studies, and non-clinical studies were excluded. Articles were identified in PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Microsoft Academic, Crossref and Semantic Scholar databases. RESULTS: Of the 3,202 articles found in the initial search, 2,336 articles were removed after deduplication and 834 articles following title and abstract screening. A further 14 were removed after full text reading, with 18 articles finally included. Data were provided for 3,628 patients, including 1,535 DRFDs, 956 VLUs, and 791 PIs, with 164 microbial genera and 116 species identified using mNGS approaches. A high microbial diversity was observed depending on the geographical location and wound evolution. Clinically infected wounds were the most diverse, possibly due to a widespread colonisation by pathogenic bacteria from body and environmental microbiota. mNGS data identified the presence of virus (EBV) and fungi (Candida and Aspergillus species), as well as Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas bacteriophages. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the benefit of mNGS for time-effective pathogen genome detection. Despite the majority of the included studies investigating only 16 S rDNA, ignoring a part of viral, fungal and parasite colonisation, mNGS detected a large number of bacteria through the included studies. Such technology could be implemented in routine microbiology for hard-to-heal wound microbiota investigation and post-treatment wound colonisation surveillance.


Subject(s)
Bacteria , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Metagenomics , Humans , Metagenomics/methods , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteria/classification , Wound Healing , Microbiota/genetics , Pressure Ulcer/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Wound Infection/microbiology , Varicose Ulcer/microbiology
19.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0301767, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758936

ABSTRACT

The primary objective of this study was to isolate bacteria from diabetic foot ulcers and subsequently assess their antibiotic resistance capabilities. Seventy-five patients diagnosed with diabetic foot ulcers were investigated. A number of these patients (97.33%) had type 2 diabetes, with a significant proportion of them having been diagnosed for 1-5 years (29.33%). Notably, a substantial number of these individuals were on insulin usage (78.66%). Among the patients under examination, 49.33% reported having no use of tobacco products, alcohol, or betel leaf. The ulcers analyzed in this study were classified into grades 1-5 according to the Wagner scale. Wagner grade 2 diabetic foot ulcers had the highest number of culture-positive patients, at 33.33%. Pus samples collected from patients were cultured on selective media, and bacterial identity was confirmed by biochemical tests and polymerase chain reaction. A total of 141 isolates were isolated. Among the isolates, 82.97% gram-negative bacteria and 17.02% gram-positive bacteria were detected. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common isolate. Proteus spp., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were also detected. Approximately 61.33% of the ulcers exhibited were polybacterial. In this study, it was observed that all bacterial isolates, except for Proteus spp., were primarily detected in patients classified under Wagner's grade 2. Moreover, antibiotic susceptibility was also tested on these 141 isolates. Among them, Escherichia coli showed the highest multidrug resistance, 81.81%. Most of the gram-negative bacteria were resistant to ampicillin. All of the gram-negative isolates exhibited high levels of susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam, and these levels were Klebsiella pneumoniae (97.56%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (95.24%), Escherichia coli (81.82%), and Proteus spp. (80%). On the other hand, gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus mostly showed sensitivity towards vancomycin and norfloxacin (79.17%).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Diabetic Foot , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Humans , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Aged , Adult , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/microbiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
20.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 63(4): 490-494, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588891

ABSTRACT

Residual osteomyelitis is a frequent problem following surgical intervention for diabetic foot infection. The Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines recommend a prolonged course of antibiotics for treatment of residual osteomyelitis. Recent literature suggests oral antibiotic therapy is not inferior to IV therapy. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate treatment success in 128 patients receiving oral versus IV antibiotics for residual osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot after amputation at a Level 1 academic medical trauma center. Treatment success was defined as completion of at least 4 weeks of antibiotic therapy, complete surgical wound healing, and no residual infection requiring further debridement or amputation within 1 year of the initial surgery. Patients with peripheral arterial disease were excluded. A retrospective chart review was performed, and we found no statistically significant difference in treatment success between these two groups (p = .2766). The median time to healing for oral antibiotic treatment was 3.17 months compared to 4.06 months for IV treatment (p = .1045). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in group demographics or comorbidities, aside from more patients in the IV group having coronary artery disease (p = .0416). The type of closure and whether the infection was single or polymicrobial were also not associated with a difference in outcomes between the two treatment arms. The results of the present study suggest oral antibiotics for treatment of residual osteomyelitis are not inferior to IV therapy and may be more efficacious for certain patients regarding cost and ease of administration.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Diabetic Foot , Osteomyelitis , Trauma Centers , Humans , Osteomyelitis/drug therapy , Osteomyelitis/etiology , Osteomyelitis/microbiology , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Administration, Oral , Aged , Administration, Intravenous , Academic Medical Centers , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing/drug effects , Amputation, Surgical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL