Structural bases for Na+-Cl- cotransporter inhibition by thiazide diuretic drugs and activation by kinases.

The Na+-Cl- cotransporter (NCC) drives salt reabsorption in the kidney and plays a decisive role in balancing electrolytes and blood pressure. Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics inhibit NCC-mediated renal salt retention and have been cornerstones for treating hypertension and edema since the 1950s. Here we determine NCC co-structures individually complexed with the thiazide drug hydrochlorothiazide, and two thiazide-like drugs chlorthalidone and indapamide, revealing that they fit into an orthosteric site and occlude the NCC ion translocation pathway. Aberrant NCC activation by the WNKs-SPAK kinase cascade underlies Familial Hyperkalemic Hypertension, but it remains unknown whether/how phosphorylation transforms the NCC structure to accelerate ion translocation. We show that an intracellular amino-terminal motif of NCC, once phosphorylated, associates with the carboxyl-terminal domain, and together, they interact with the transmembrane domain. These interactions suggest a phosphorylation-dependent allosteric network that directly influences NCC ion translocation.

[Renal failure and drug-drug interactions]. / Bei Niereninsuffizienz auf Arzneimittel-Interaktionen achten!

Renal failure is common and comes with a steep increasing prevalence in older patients. It is a frequent aspect in multimorbidity and associated with polypharmacia. Based on available literature an overview is given concerning important drug-drug interactions and how to avoid or manage them. Among a large variety of possible interactions anticoagulation and diuretic therapy still represent the highest clinical relevance.

Glucocorticoid-induced acute diuresis in rats in relation to the reduced renal expression of sodium-dependent cotransporter genes.

Although several studies have shown that glucocorticoids exert diuretic effects in animals and humans, the underlying mechanism responsible for the acute diuretic effect remains obscure. Here we examined the mechanism in terms of gene-expression. We observed that glucocorticoids, including dexamethasone (Dex) and prednisolone (PSL), acutely induced diuresis in rats in a dose-dependent manner. Free water clearance values were negative after Dex or PSL treatment, similar to those observed after treatment with osmotic diuretics (furosemide and acetazolamide). Dex significantly increased the urinary excretion of sodium, potassium, chloride, glucose, and inorganic phosphorus. Renal microarray analysis revealed that Dex significantly altered the renal expression of genes related to transmembrane transport activity. The mRNA levels of sodium/phosphate (NaPi-2a/Slc34a1, NaPi-2b/Slc34a2, and NaPi-2c/Slc34a3) and sodium/glucose cotransporters (Sglt2/Slc5a2) were significantly reduced in the Dex-treated kidney, being negatively correlated with the urinary excretion of their corresponding solutes. Dex did not affect renal expression of the natriuretic peptide receptor 1 (Npr1) gene, or the expression, localization, and phosphorylation of aquaporin-2 (AQP2), a water channel protein. These findings suggest that the acute diuretic effects of glucocorticoids might be mediated by reduced expression of sodium-dependent cotransporter genes.

Prevalent and new use of common drugs for the incidence of community-acquired acute kidney injury: cohort and case-crossover study.

Although community-acquired acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) represents a significant subset of all AKI incidence, evidence is limited due to the lack of comprehensive data prior to diagnosis. Here, we examined the risk of drug use for CA-AKI by using exhaustive pre-diagnostic prescription data. We included 78,754 working-age healthy individuals who underwent an annual health checkup program. We conducted a cohort study to assess the association between prevalent drug use and subsequent CA-AKI incidence using the Cox proportional hazard model. Subsequently, we conducted a case-crossover study to compare the new drug use in the case period directly before the CA-AKI incidence (- 3 to 0 months) with that in the control period far before the CA-AKI incidence (- 15 to - 12 months and - 9 to - 6 months) using the conditional Poisson regression model. The prevalent use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors was associated with an increased CA-AKI incidence, but the new use was not. The new use of diuretics, anti-infectious drugs, and contrast medium was also associated with an increased CA-AKI incidence. These results suggest we need to pay attention for the incidence of AKI among the general population taking those common drugs.

Preferred diuretic therapy for primary hypertension: Chlorthalidone or hydrochlorothiazide?

ABSTRACT: Because of its greater reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), chlorthalidone is recommended over hydrochlorothiazide as the preferred diuretic for patients with primary hypertension. However, hydrochlorothiazide is more commonly prescribed than chlorthalidone for this condition. This article reviews recent studies investigating the effectiveness of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide in reducing MACE, to help clinicians make an evidence-based informed decision on which diuretic to prescribe.

Clinical Outcomes of Metabolic Surgery on Diuretic Use in Patients With Heart Failure.

The beneficial impacts of metabolic surgery (MS) on patients with heart failure (HF) are incompletely characterized. We aimed to describe the cardiac and metabolic effects of MS in patients with HF and hypothesized that patients with HF would experience both improved metabolic and HF profiles using glycemic control and diuretic dependency as surrogate markers. In this single-center, university-affiliated academic study in the United States, a review of 2,342 hospital records of patients who underwent MS (2017 to 2023) identified 63 patients with a medical history of HF. Preoperative characteristics, 30-day outcomes, and up to 2-year biometric and metabolic outcomes, medication usage, and emergency department utilization were collected. At 24 months, mean body mass index change was -16 kg/m2 (p <0.001) that corresponded to a mean percentage total body weight loss of 29% (p <0.001). Weight loss was accompanied by significant reductions in hemoglobin A1c (p <0.001) and a 65% decrease in diuretic use at 24 months after surgery (p <0.001). Similarly, emergency visits for cardiac conditions (p = 0.06) and intravenous diuresis (p = 0.07) trended favorably at 1 year after surgery compared with 1 year before surgery but were not statistically significant. In conclusion, in patients with HF who were carefully selected, MS appears to provide significant reduction in oral diuretic dependency, and metabolic improvements with trends toward lower rates of emergency department utilization.

Time series forecasting of weight for diuretic dose adjustment using bidirectional long short-term memory.

Loop diuretics are prevailing drugs to manage fluid overload in heart failure. However, adjusting to loop diuretic doses is strenuous due to the lack of a diuretic guideline. Accordingly, we developed a novel clinician decision support system for adjusting loop diuretics dosage with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) algorithm using time-series EMRs. Weight measurements were used as the target to estimate fluid loss during diuretic therapy. We designed the TSFD-LSTM, a bi-directional LSTM model with an attention mechanism, to forecast weight change 48 h after heart failure patients were injected with loop diuretics. The model utilized 65 variables, including disease conditions, concurrent medications, laboratory results, vital signs, and physical measurements from EMRs. The framework processed four sequences simultaneously as inputs. An ablation study on attention mechanisms and a comparison with the transformer model as a baseline were conducted. The TSFD-LSTM outperformed the other models, achieving 85% predictive accuracy with MAE and MSE values of 0.56 and 1.45, respectively. Thus, the TSFD-LSTM model can aid in personalized loop diuretic treatment and prevent adverse drug events, contributing to improved healthcare efficacy for heart failure patients.

Shared Medical Appointments in Heart Failure for Post Acute Care Follow-Up: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Shared medical appointments (SMAs) in heart failure (HF) are medical visits where several patients with HF meet with multidisciplinary providers at the same time for efficient and comprehensive care. It is unknown whether HF-SMAs can improve overall and cardiac health status for high-risk patients with HF discharged from acute care. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 3-site, open-label, randomized-controlled-trial was conducted. Participants within 12 weeks of HF acute care (emergency-room/hospitalization) requiring intravenous diuretic therapy were randomized to receive either HF-SMA or usual HF clinical care (usual-care) on a 1:1 ratio. The HF-SMA team, which consisted of a nurse, nutritionist, psychologist, nurse practitioner and/or a clinical pharmacist, provided four 2-hour session HF-SMAs that met every other week for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were the overall health status measured by European Quality of Life Visual Analog Scale and cardiac health status by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, 180 days postrandomization. Of the 242 patients enrolled (HF-SMA n=117, usual-care n=125, mean age 69.3±9.4 years, 71.5% White patients, 94.6% male), 84% of participants completed the study (n=8 HF-SMA and n=9 usual-care patients died). After 180 days, both HF-SMA and usual-care participants had significant improvements from baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire that were not statistically different. Only HF-SMA participants had significant improvements in European Quality of Life Visual Analog Scale (mean change = 7.2±15.8 in HF-SMA versus -0.4±19.0 points in usual-care, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both HF-SMA and usual-care in participants with HF achieved significant improvements in cardiac health status, but only a team approach through HF-SMA achieved significant improvements in overall health status. Future larger studies are needed to evaluate hospitalization and death outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02481921.

FIRE Stones: impact of forced diuresis on the residual fragment rate after flexible ureteroscopy for destruction of kidney stones with laser-protocol for a randomized controlled two-parallel group multicenter trial with blinding evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Lithiasis is a common and recurrent disease. Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is the cornerstone of laser treatment of kidney stones. Kidney stones destruction requires its laser pulverization into small fragments in order to remove them through the ureter or improve their spontaneous expulsion along the urinary tract. However, most of the time, all the micro-fragments and dust created cannot be extracted using our surgical tools and may stay intra-renally at the end of the procedure. Adjuvant treatments (such as forced diuresis, inversion or mechanical pressure) were previously described to improve the expulsion of stone fragments after extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Nevertheless, the impact of adjuvant treatment after fURS remains unclear and mainly theoretical. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to show that the injection of 40 mg of furosemide in slow intravenous during 10 min, after the procedure, increases the stone-free rate 3 months after a fURS for destruction of kidney stones with laser. METHODS/DESIGN: The study will be a two-parallel group randomized, controlled, multicentric trial with a blinding evaluation. Nine French departments of urology will participate. Patients will be randomized in 2 groups: the experimental group (injection of 40 mg of furosemide at the end of the surgery) and a control one (usual care). Patients will be followed up for 3 months (± 2 weeks) after the surgery. Then, we will perform a low dose abdomino-pelvic CT scan. The primary outcome is the stone-free rate at 3 months. A centralized review of the images will be performed by two specialized radiologists, in a blind and crossed way to allow a homogenization of the results. The secondary outcomes will include the rate of early post-operative urinary tract infection (UTI), the evaluation of post-operative pain, and the safety of the use of furosemide in patients treated by fURS for renal stone laser destruction. As secondary objectives, it is also planned to look at the effect of the prescription of an alpha-blocker as usual treatment on stone-free rate and to assess the agreement between the imaging analysis of the urologist and the specialized radiologist. DISCUSSION: Lithiasis is a public health problem. It affects about 10% of the general population. This prevalence is increasing (multiplied by 3 in 40 years), partly due to changes in the population's eating habits over the years. The lithiasis patient is a patient with a chronic disease requiring annual follow-up and who may suffer from multiple recurrences, with a recurrence rate at 5 years of 50%. Recurrences are partly due to residual fragments left in the kidneys at the end of the operation. Other risk factors for recurrence include dietary hygiene and the presence of an associated metabolic disease. The metabolic blood and urine tests recommended by the Association Française d'Urologie (AFU) can be used to manage these last two problems. As far as residual fragments are concerned, their presence leads to an early recurrence of stones because they form the bed for a new aggregation of crystals in the kidneys. Being able to reduce the rate of residual fragments in patients with the use of furosemide at the end of the intervention therefore seems essential in the management of recurrences in our patients. This will also improve our patients' quality of life. Indeed, lithiasis disease leads to chronic pain associated with acute pain that motivates consultations to the emergency for specialized management. This study is the first to evaluate the impact of forced diuresis with the use of furosemide on the stone-free rate after a fURS for destruction of kidney stone with laser. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05916963 , first received: 22 June 2023. EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT Number: 2022-502890-40-00.

Cost-effectiveness of single-pill and separate-pill administration of antihypertensive triple combination therapy: a population-based microsimulation study.

BACKGROUND: Single-pill combination (SPC) of three antihypertensive drugs has been shown to improve adherence to therapy compared with free combinations, but little is known about its long-term costs and health consequences. This study aimed to evaluate the lifetime cost-effectiveness profile of a three-drug SPC of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, a calcium-channel blocker, and a diuretic vs the corresponding two-pill administration (a two-drug SPC plus a third drug separately) from the Italian payer perspective. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using multi-state semi-Markov modeling and microsimulation. Using the healthcare utilization database of the Lombardy Region (Italy), 30,172 and 65,817 patients aged ≥ 40 years who initiated SPC and two-pill combination, respectively, between 2015 and 2018 were identified. The observation period extended from the date of the first drug dispensation until death, emigration, or December 31, 2019. Disease and cost models were parametrized using the study cohort, and a lifetime microsimulation was applied to project costs and life expectancy for the compared strategies, assigning each of them to each cohort member. Costs and life-years gained were discounted by 3%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 1,000 samples was performed to address parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Compared with the two-pill combination, the SPC increased life expectancy by 0.86 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-1.14), with a mean cost differential of -€12 (95% CI -9,719-8,131), making it the dominant strategy (ICER = -14, 95% CI -€15,871-€7,113). The cost reduction associated with the SPC was primarily driven by savings in hospitalization costs, amounting to €1,850 (95% CI 17-7,813) and €2,027 (95% CI 19-8,603) for patients treated with the SPC and two-pill combination, respectively. Conversely, drug costs were higher for the SPC (€3,848, 95% CI 574-10,640 vs. €3,710, 95% CI 263-11,955). The cost-effectiveness profile did not significantly change according to age, sex, and clinical status. CONCLUSIONS: The SPC was projected to be cost-effective compared with the two-pill combination at almost all reasonable willingness-to-pay thresholds. As it is currently prescribed to only a few patients, the widespread use of this strategy could result in benefits for both patients and the healthcare system.

Torsemide versus Furosemide in the Treatment of Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. / Torsemida em Comparação com Furosemida no Tratamento da Insuficiência Cardíaca: Uma Revisão Sistemática e Metanálise de Ensaios Clínicos Randomizados.

Furosemide is the most used diuretic for volume overload symptoms in patients with heart failure (HF). Recent data suggested that torsemide may be superior to furosemide in this setting. However, whether this translates into better clinical outcomes in this population remains unclear. To assess whether torsemide is superior to furosemide in the setting of HF. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the efficacy of torsemide versus furosemide in patients with HF. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for eligible trials. Outcomes of interest were all-cause hospitalizations, hospitalizations for HF (HHF), hospitalizations for all cardiovascular causes, all-cause mortality, and NYHA class improvement. Echocardiographic parameters were also assessed. We applied a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and a 0.05 level of significance. 12 RCTs were included, comprising 4,115 patients. Torsemide significantly reduced HHF (RR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.83; p=0.002; I2=0%), hospitalization for cardiovascular causes (RR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.88; p=0.0009; I2=0%), and improved LVEF (MD 4.51%; 95% CI, 2.94 to 6.07; p<0.0001; I2=0%) compared with furosemide. There was no significant difference in all-cause hospitalizations (RR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-1.00; p=0.04; I2=0%), all-cause mortality (RR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.87-1.10; p=0.73; I2=0%), NYHA class improvement (RR 1.25; 95% CI, 0.92-1.68; p=0.15; I2=0%), or NYHA class change (MD -0.04; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.16; p=0.70; I2=15%) between groups. Torsemide significantly reduced hospitalizations for HF and cardiovascular causes, also improving LVEF.

A furosemida é o diurético mais utilizado para o tratamento de sintomas de sobrecarga de volume em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca. Dados recentes sugerem que a torsemida pode ser superior à furosemida neste contexto. No entanto, ainda não é claro se isso se traduz em melhores resultados clínicos nesta população. Avaliar se a torsemida é superior à furosemida no contexto da insuficiência cardíaca. Realizamos uma revisão sistemática e metanálise de estudos clínicos randomizados (ECRs) comparando a eficácia da torsemida em comparação com a furosemida em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca. PubMed, Embase e Web of Science foram as bases de dados pesquisadas em busca de estudos elegíveis. Os desfechos de interesse foram internações por todas as causas, internações por insuficiência cardíaca (IIC), internações por todas as causas cardiovasculares, mortalidade por todas as causas, e melhoria de classe da NYHA. Parâmetros ecocardiográficos também foram avaliados. Foi aplicado um modelo de efeitos aleatórios para calcular as razões de risco (RR) e as diferenças médias (DM) com intervalos de confiança (IC) de 95% e nível de significância de 0,05. Foram incluídos 12 ECRs, envolvendo 4.115 pacientes. A torsemida reduziu significativamente a IIC (RR de 0,60; IC de 95%, 0,43-0,83; p=0,002; I2=0%), internação por causas cardiovasculares (RR de 0,72; IC de 95%, 0,60-0,88; p=0,0009; I2=0%), e melhora da fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE) (DM de 4,51%; IC de 95%, 2,94 a 6,07; p<0,0001; I2=0%) em comparação com a furosemida. Não houve diferença significativa no número de internações por todas as causas (RR de 0,93; IC de 95%, 0,86-1,00; p=0,04; I2=0%), mortalidade por todas as causas (RR de 0,98; IC de 95%, 0,87-1,10; p=0,73; I2=0%), melhora da classe NYHA (RR de 1,25; IC de 95%, 0,92-1,68; p=0,15; I2=0%), ou mudança de classe NYHA (DM de -0,04; IC de 95%, -0,24 a 0,16; p=0,70; I2=15%) entre os grupos. A torsemida reduziu significativamente as internações por insuficiência cardíaca e causas cardiovasculares, melhorando também a FEVE.

Real-World Treatment of Hypertension on Hemodialyses Data from a Large Polish Database.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of hypertension among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing hemodialysis (HD) ranges from 72 to 88% depending on applied diagnostic criteria and the chosen method of blood pressure measurement. Despite the guidelines recommending the widespread use of renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs) in patients with kidney disease, their utilization in patients on HD may be suboptimal, especially in patients with preserved diuresis. This hesitance that often steams from concern is often due to fear of a decrease in eGFR and a subsequent decrease in diuresis. The aim of this study was to compare clinical characteristics, blood pressure, safety, and HD adequacy indices in hypertensive HD patients on multiple antihypertensive drug regimens, including diuretic treated with RASB (RASB group) or without RASB (no-RASB) with preserved residual diuresis. We sought to examine the real-life use of RASB in HD patients in relation to their clinical characteristics, blood pressure, safety, and HD adequacy. METHODS: From a database of 5,879 patients receiving HD (mean age 65.2 ± 14.2 years, 60% of males) of the largest provider of HD in the country, we selected the subgroup treated with at least three antihypertensive medications including diuretics. We compared patients treated with RASB to counterparts without RASB (no-RASB). RESULTS: The RASB group has similar age and gender proportions as well as BMI and bioimpedance compared to counterparts. However, dry body mass was significantly lower in the RASB group (78.1 ± 18.3 kg vs. 80.0 ± 18.2 kg, p < 0.017). Prevalence of diabetes mellitus was similar in both groups, but RASB-treated patients have cardiovascular diseases more frequently (70.1 vs. 60.8%; p < 0.001). Systolic blood pressure and the number of antihypertensive drugs used were significantly higher in RASB patients than in counterparts (146 ± 16 mm Hg vs. 144 ± 15 mm Hg; p < 0.001 and 4.1 ± 0.9 vs. 3.5 ± 0.5; p < 0001, respectively). RASB-treated patients have significantly longer dialysis vintage (52.7 ± 44.4 months vs. 40.2 ± 40.9 months; p < 0.001) and dialysis time (722 ± 87.1 min/week vs. 713 ± 93.4 min/week; p < 0.017) than counterparts. Serum potassium was slightly but significantly higher in RASB (5.3 ± 0.8 mmol/L vs. 5.1 ± 0.7 mmol/L; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the real world setting, RASB can be safely used in HD patients treated with diuretics with preserved residual diuresis. Given that many HD patients present numerous multimorbidities, RASB should not only be considered as an additional hypotensive drug in poorly controlled hypertension but also in other compelling indications in HD patients. The tendency toward hyperkalemia in HD patients could be effectively managed with appropriate diet and HD prescription adjustments.

Acetazolamide therapy in patients with acute heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Acute heart failure (AHF) often leads to unfavorable outcomes due to fluid overload. While diuretics are the cornerstone treatment, acetazolamide may enhance diuretic efficiency by reducing sodium reabsorption. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of acetazolamide as an add-on therapy in patients with AHF compared to diuretic therapy. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT). A random-effects model was employed to compute mean differences and risk ratios. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. The GRADE approach was used to rate the certainty of the evidence. We included 4 RCTs with 634 patients aged 68 to 81 years. Over a mean follow-up of 3 days to 34 months, acetazolamide significantly increased diuresis (MD 899.2 mL; 95% CI 249.5 to 1549; p < 0.01) and natriuresis (MD 72.44 mmol/L; 95% CI 39.4 to 105.4; p < 0.01) after 48 h of its administration. No association was found between acetazolamide use and WRF (RR 2.4; 95% CI 0.4 to 14.2; p = 0.3) or all-cause mortality (RR 1.2; 95% CI 0.8 to 1.9; p = 0.3). Clinical decongestion was significantly higher in the intervention group (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.68; p = 0.01). Acetazolamide is an effective add-on therapy in patients with AHF, increasing diuresis, natriuresis, and clinical decongestion, but it was not associated with differences in mortality.

Spot urinary sodium in CKD patients: correlation with 24h-excretion and evaluation of commonly used prediction equations.

BACKGROUND: Salt intake in CKD patients can affect cardiovascular risk and kidney disease progression. Twenty-four hour (24h) urine collections are often used to investigate salt metabolism but are cumbersome to perform. We assessed urinary sodium (U-Na) concentration in spot urine samples and investigated the correlation with 24h U-Na excretion and concentration in CKD patients under nephrological care. Further, we studied the role of CKD stage and diuretics and evaluated the performance of commonly used formulas for the prediction of 24h U-Na excretion from spot urine samples. METHODS: One hundred eight patients of the German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) study were included. Each participant collected a 24h urine and two spot urine samples within the same period. The first spot urine sample (AM) was part of the second morning urine. The second urine sample was collected before dinner (PM). Patients were advised to take their medication as usual without changing dietary habits. U-Na concentrations in the two spot urine samples and their average ((AM + PM)/2) were correlated with U-Na concentration and total Na excretion in the 24h urine collections. Correlations were subsequently studied after stratification by CKD stage and diuretic intake. The usefulness of three commonly applied equations to estimate 24h U-Na excretion from spot urine samples (Kawasaki, Tanaka and Intersalt) was determined using Bland-Altman plots, analyses of sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV). RESULTS: Participants (42 women, 66 men) were on average (± SD) 62.2 (± 11.9) years old, with a mean serum creatinine of 1.6 (± 0.5) mg/dl. 95% had arterial hypertension, 37% diabetes mellitus and 55% were on diuretics. The best correlation with 24h U-Na total excretion was found for the PM spot U-Na sample. We also found strong correlations when comparing spot and 24h urine U-Na concentration. Correction of spot U-Na for U-creatinine did not improve strength of correlations. Neither CKD stage, nor intake of diuretics had significant impact on these correlations. All examined formulas revealed a significant mean bias. The lowest mean bias and the strongest correlation between estimated and measured U-Na excretion in 24h were obtained using the Tanaka-formula. Also, application of the Tanaka-formula with PM U-Na provided best sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV to estimate U-Na excretion > 4g/d corresponding to a salt consumption > 10g/d. CONCLUSION: U-Na concentration of spot urine samples correlated with 24h U-Na excretion especially when PM spot U-Na was used. However, correlation coefficients were relatively low. Neither CKD stage nor intake of diuretics appeared to have an influence on these correlations. There was a significant bias for all tested formulas with the Tanaka-formula providing the strongest correlation with measured 24h U-Na excretion. In summary, using spot urine samples together with the Tanaka-formula in epidemiological studies appears feasible to determine associations between approximate salt intake and outcomes in CKD patients. However, the usefulness of spot-urine samples to guide and monitor salt consumption in individual patients remains limited.

Full decongestion in acute heart failure therapy.

Incomplete decongestion is the main cause of readmission in the early post-discharge period of a hospitalization for acute heart failure. Recent heart failure guidelines have highlighted initiation and rapid up-titration of quadruple therapy with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, beta adrenergic receptor blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor to prevent hospitalizations for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, full decongestion remains the foremost therapeutic goal of hospitalization for heart failure. While early addition of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists may be helpful, the value of the other therapeutics comes after decongestion is complete.

Clinical management of unremitting nephrogenic diabetes insipidus.

The polyuria and polydipsia state in diabetes insipidus (DI) can be challenging to manage for patients and clinicians with significant impact on the patients' well-being. A review of literature shows that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), thiazide and potassium-sparing diuretics, along with low dietary solute and protein, and high water intake remain the standard medical therapy. Although these therapeutic approaches improve symptoms, the urine-concentrating defect is still considerable, posing a serious risk to patient's life from hypovolemia if high fluid intake is not maintained. Our case describes the challenges faced with the medical management of a patient with nephrogenic DI that was only partially responsive to standard medical therapy, resulting in debilitating effects on the patient's quality of life.