Concomitant use of lansoprazole and ceftriaxone is associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac arrest in a large Japanese hospital database.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether concomitant use of ceftriaxone and oral or intravenous lansoprazole increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest in the real-world setting in Japan. METHODS: The data analyzed were obtained from the JMDC hospital-based administrative claims database for the period April 2014 to August 2022. Patients who received a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) while receiving ceftriaxone or sulbactam/ampicillin were identified. The frequency of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest was analyzed according to whether oral or intravenous PPI was concomitant with ceftriaxone or sulbactam/ampicillin. Estimates of the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest were then compared among the groups, using the Fine-Gray competing risk regression model. RESULTS: The results showed that the risk of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest was significantly higher with concomitant ceftriaxone and oral lansoprazole (hazard ratio 2.92, 95% confidence interval 1.99-4.29, P < 0.01) or intravenous lansoprazole (hazard ratio 4.57, 95% confidence interval 1.24-16.80, P = 0.02) than with concomitant sulbactam/ampicillin and oral or intravenous lansoprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Oral and intravenous lansoprazole may increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest in patients who are receiving ceftriaxone.

Risk and Time-to-Onset of Acute Kidney Injury With Vancomycin Plus Piperacillin-tazobactam Combination: Analysis Using JADER.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pharmacovigilance data and clinical studies have indicated a risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with concomitant administration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam. However, no pharmacovigilance studies have evaluated time-to-onset and outcomes of AKI related to this combination. Therefore, this study used a pharmacovigilance database to investigate the incidence, time-to-onset, and outcomes of AKI in patients treated with intravenous vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam or other antipseudomonal antibiotics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From data in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database, we calculated the reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), time-to-onset, and outcomes of AKI following intravenous administration of vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam or other antipseudomonal antibiotics and with other vancomycin regimens, including monotherapy. RESULTS: The JADER database contained 4,471 reports of intravenous vancomycin treatment, including 517 reports of AKI. The adjusted RORs (95%CIs) of AKI in cases with co-administration of intravenous vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam was 2.58 (2.06-3.24). The median time-to-onset for AKI in vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam was 6.0 (interquartile range=3.0-10.3). Weibull shape parameter analysis showed that the pattern of onset of AKI in vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam represented a wear out failure, predicting an increasing hazard with time. For the outcome of AKI, there was no significant difference between all vancomycin regimen and the piperacillin-tazobactam combination groups. CONCLUSION: Concomitant use of intravenous vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam may increase the incidence of AKI but may not affect the outcome. This combination does not necessarily have to be avoided, but long-term use is not advisable.

Associations between change in BMI and the risk of hypertension and dyslipidaemia in people receiving integrase strand-transfer inhibitors, tenofovir alafenamide, or both compared with other contemporary antiretroviral regimens: a multicentre, prospective observational study from the RESPOND consortium cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) and tenofovir alafenamide have been associated with weight gain in several clinical trials and observational cohorts. However, whether weight gain associated with INSTIs and tenofovir alafenamide confers a higher risk of weight-related clinical events is unclear. We aimed to assess whether changes in BMI differentially increase hypertension or dyslipidaemia risk in people with HIV receiving INSTIs, tenofovir alafenamide, or both versus other contemporary regimens. METHODS: This multicentre, prospective observational study analysed prospective data from RESPOND, an international consortium of HIV cohorts for which recruitment began in 2017 and is still ongoing from HIV clinics and hospitals in 37 European countries and Australia. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, receiving INSTI-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens or a contemporary non-INSTI, did not have hypertension or dyslipidaemia at baseline, and had baseline and at least two follow-up BMI, lipid, and blood pressure measurements. We excluded participants without baseline CD4 or HIV RNA results and those receiving non-ART medications associated with weight changes, including antipsychotics and mood stabilisers, corticosteroids, insulin, and insulin secretagogues. They were followed up from baseline until the earliest hypertension or dyslipidaemia event, their last visit, or Dec 31, 2021, whichever was earlier. The primary outcomes were incidence of hypertension and dyslipidaemia, for which we used multivariable Poisson regression adjusted for time-updated BMI to determine unadjusted and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of hypertension and dyslipidaemia in people receiving INSTIs, tenofovir alafenamide, or both, and tested for interaction between time-updated ART regimen and BMI. FINDINGS: Of the 35 941 RESPOND participants, 9704 (7327 [75·5 %] male and 2377 [24·5%] female) were included in the hypertension analysis and 5231 (3796 [72·6%] male and 1435 [27·4%] female) were included in the dyslipidaemia analysis. In the univariable model, hypertension was more common in individuals receiving an INSTI with tenofovir alafenamide (IRR 1·70, 95% CI 1·54-1·88) or an INSTI without tenofovir alafenamide (1·41, 1·30-1·53) compared with those receiving neither INSTIs nor tenofovir alafenamide. Adjustment for time-updated BMI and confounders attenuated risk in participants receiving an INSTI with (IRR 1·48, 1·31-1·68) or without (1·25, 1·13-1·39) tenofovir alafenamide. Similarly, dyslipidaemia was more common in participants using tenofovir alafenamide with an INSTI (IRR 1·24, 1·10-1·40) and tenofovir alafenamide alone (1·22, 1·03-1·44) than in participants using neither INSTI nor tenofovir alafenamide. Adjustment for BMI and confounders attenuated the risk in participants receiving tenofovir alafenamide with an INSTI (adjusted IRR 1·21, 1·07-1·37), whereas the risk in those receiving tenofovir alafenamide alone became non-significant (1·15, 0·96-1·38). The associations between increasing BMI and risk of hypertension and dyslipidaemia did not differ between participants receiving different ART regimens (pinteraction=0·46 for hypertension; pinteraction=0·31 for dyslipidaemia). INTERPRETATION: Although residual confounding cannot be entirely excluded, the use of INSTIs was associated with incident hypertension, and the use of tenofovir alafenamide was associated with dyslipidaemia, with the latter association partly mediated by weight gain. These results reiterate the need for hypertension and dyslipidaemia screening in people with HIV. FUNDING: The CHU St Pierre Brussels HIV Cohort, The Austrian HIV Cohort Study, The Australian HIV Observational Database, The AIDS Therapy Evaluation in the Netherlands national observational HIV cohort, The Brighton HIV Cohort, The National Croatian HIV Cohort, The EuroSIDA cohort, The Frankfurt HIV Cohort Study, The Georgian National AIDS Health Information System, The Nice HIV Cohort, The ICONA Foundation, The Modena HIV Cohort, The PISCIS Cohort Study, The Swiss HIV Cohort Study, The Swedish InfCare HIV Cohort, The Royal Free HIV Cohort Study, The San Raffaele Scientific Institute, The University Hospital Bonn HIV Cohort, The University of Cologne HIV Cohort, Merck Life Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, renin-angiotensin system blockade or diuretics and risk of acute kidney injury: A case-crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Aging-related physiological changes, such as decline in renal function, not only exacerbates pre-existing comorbidities but also escalate the susceptibility to adverse events. Previous studies have shown that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), and the concomitant use of renin-angiotensin system blockade or diuretics may further potentiate the risk. However, studies evaluating the risk of AKI associated with NSAIDs (including routes, concomitant use of different NSAIDs, categories (traditional NSAIDs or COX-2 inhibitors), and cumulative doses of NSAIDs) are limited, particularly the risk of AKI associated with the dual or triple combination of NSAIDs with renin-angiotensin system blockade (RAS blockades) and/or diuretics. METHODS: A case-crossover study utilized two sets of longitudinal data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Newly admitted patients with a primary AKI diagnosis were included, with the index date defined as the first admission date. The 1-7 days and 181-187 days prior to the index date served as the case and control periods. Exposure to NSAIDs and co-exposures of RAS blockade and/or diuretics were assessed in both periods. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models, adjusting for potential confounders, estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for AKI associated with NSAIDs, dual, or triple combinations. Sensitivity analyses explored result robustness by varying case and control period lengths. RESULTS: The study included 1,284 newly diagnosed AKI patients. NSAIDs showed a 3.55-fold increased risk of AKI (aOR: 3.55; 95 % CI 2.70-4.65), with similar risks for traditional NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. Use of multiple NSAIDs, parenteral dosage forms, and higher cumulative doses increased AKI risk. Dual combination with either RAS blockade or diuretics resulted in a 2.90-fold (aOR: 2.90; 95 %CI 1.47-5.70) and 12.68-fold (aOR: 12.68; 95 %CI 6.15-26.12) risk, respectively. The highest risk occurred with triple combination (aOR: 29.22; 95 %CI 12.82-66.64). CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs, including both non-selective NSAIDs and COX2 inhibitors, elevate the risk of AKI. Increased AKI risk is linked to using multiple NSAIDs, the parenteral dosage form, and higher cumulative doses. Dual combination of RAS blockade with NSAIDs or diuretics with NSAIDs, as well as triple therapy, heightens the risk, with the latter associated with the highest risk of AKI.

Efficacy and safety of venlafaxine hydrochloride combined with tandospirone citrate for patients with vascular depression accompanied by somatic symptoms: An open-labeled randomized control trial.

AIMS: To explore the pharmacological treatment of vascular depression (VaDep) and whether the blood levels of neurotransmitters can reflect the VaDep severity. METHODS: VaDep patients with somatic symptoms were enrolled and randomly received venlafaxine + tandospirone (Combined Group) or venlafaxine (Monotherapy Group). The treatment efficacy was assessed by Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), and Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15). The levels of blood monoamine neurotransmitters were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Both groups reported a progressive decrease in HAMD, HAMA, and PHQ-15 scores to below the baseline after the respective treatment. Compared with the Monotherapy Group, the Combined Group reported a significant decrease in HAMD score at week 2 and markedly lower HAMA and PHQ-15 scores at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8. Both groups showed a decrease in the levels of blood monoamine neurotransmitters at weeks 4 and 8 when compared with the baseline. A strong positive association was evident between the plasma 5-HT levels and the HAMD score. CONCLUSION: The combined therapy rapidly acts on VaDep comorbid with anxiety and somatic symptoms and significantly alleviates the anxiety and somatic symptoms. The plasma levels of 5-HT may serve as potential objective candidates in evaluating VaDep severity and the efficacy of the undertaken treatment regimen.

A 52-week efficacy and safety study of enavogliflozin versus dapagliflozin as an add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: ENHANCE-M extension study.

AIM: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day added to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After 24 weeks of a randomized, double-blind treatment period with enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day (n = 101) or dapagliflozin 10 mg/day (n = 99) added to metformin, all patients received enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day plus metformin for an additional 28 weeks during the open-label extension period. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients continued enavogliflozin (maintenance group), and 77 were switched from dapagliflozin to enavogliflozin (switch group). All adverse drug reactions (ADR) were mild in severity. In the maintenance group, ADRs (cystitis and vaginal infection) were reported in two patients (2.44%) during 52 weeks. In the switch group, ADR (hypoglycaemia) was reported in one patient (1.30%) during a 28-week open-label extension period. At week 52, glycated haemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose were significantly lower than at the baseline, by 0.85% and 29.08 mg/dl, respectively, in the maintenance group (p < .0001 for both), and by 0.81% and 32.77 mg/dl, respectively, in the switch group (p < .0001 for both). At week 52, 68.92% of patients from the maintenance group and 64.29% from the switch group achieved glycated haemoglobin <7%. A significant increase in the urine glucose-creatinine ratio was observed at week 52, by 58.81 g/g and 63.77 g/g in the maintenance and switch groups, respectively (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Enavogliflozin added to metformin was tolerated well for up to 52 weeks and provided continual glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus, along with a significant increase in the urine glucose-creatinine ratio.

The efficacy and safety of using a combination of rocuronium and sugammadex for awake craniotomy anesthesia: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Awake craniotomy (AC) is a neurosurgical method for the resection of brain lesions located in eloquent areas to achieve maximal and safe resection. A patient's arousal quality is essential for the success of the operation. This study compared the arousal time and quality after AC achieved by 2 different drug combinations: rocuronium with sugammadex and propofol with remifentanil. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial included 42 adult patients undergoing AC with a laryngeal mask, who were randomly assigned to either a rocuronium-sugammadex group (RS; n = 21) or a propofol-remifentanil without muscle relaxant group (nRS; n = 21). The primary outcomes were the arousal time and arousal quality. The secondary outcomes included the number of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) adjustments and diaphragmatic excursion length. RESULTS: This study included 42 participants. The median (IQR) arousal time was 13.5 minutes (7-20) in the RS group and 21 minutes (16.5-26.5) in the nRS group (P = .005). There was no significant difference in arousal quality between the 2 groups (P = .229). LMA adjustments were significantly less frequent in the nRS group than in the RS group [0.25 times (±0.62) vs 1.26 times (±1.17), P = .001]. Adverse events, such as spontaneous movements and brain swelling, were more frequent in the nRS group than in the RS group. CONCLUSIONS: Using a combination of rocuronium and sugammadex with propofol and remifentanil may shorten the awakening time, reduce the duration of laryngeal mask adjustment, and do not affect the arousal quality and postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing awake craniotomy, compared to propofol and remifentanil alone.

Activity and safety of eltrombopag in combination with cyclosporin A as first­line treatment of adults with severe aplastic anaemia (SOAR): a phase 2, single-arm study.

BACKGROUND: Antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based immunosuppression is standard in front-line treatment for people with severe aplastic anaemia without a histocompatible donor or who are 40 years or older. However, ATG requires in-hospital administration, is associated with infusion-related toxicities and has limited availability worldwide. In this study, we investigated the activity and safety of an ATG-free regimen of eltrombopag with cyclosporin A as a potential treatment for patients with severe aplastic anaemia who might not have access to or cannot tolerate horse-ATG. METHODS: SOAR was a multicentre, single-arm phase 2 trial investigating eltrombopag and cyclosporin in adult (≥18 years) patients with severe aplastic anaemia who were treatment-naive and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of less than 2. Participants were recruited from 20 hospitals in ten countries. Eltrombopag was initiated at 150 mg (100 mg in patients of Asian ethnicity) and cyclosporin at 10 mg/kg per day (adjusted to a trough of 200-400 µg/L) orally from day 1 to 6 months. The primary outcome was an overall haematological response rate by 6 months in the intention-to-treat population. This is the final report of the primary analysis period. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02998645, and has been completed. FINDINGS: 54 patients were enrolled between May 11, 2017, and March 23, 2020. 34 (63%) patients were male and 20 (37%) were female. 22 (41%) were Asian, 22 (41%) were White, one (2%) was Native American or Alaska Native, one (2%) was Black or African American, and eight (15%) were other race or ethnicity. 35 patients (65%) completed 6 months of treatment with eltrombopag and cyclosporin and six (11%) completed the cyclosporin tapering period up to month 24. Overall haematological response rate by month 6 of treatment was 46% (25 of 54; 95% CI 33-60). The most reported adverse events were increased serum bilirubin (in 22 patients [41%]), nausea (16 [30%]), increased alanine aminotransferase concentration (12 [22%]), and diarrhoea (12 [22%]). Eight patients died on-treatment, but no deaths were considered related to the treatment. INTERPRETATION: Eltrombopag and cyclosporin was active as front-line treatment of severe aplastic anaemia, with no unexpected safety concerns. This approach might be beneficial where horse-ATG is not available or not tolerated. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Eradication rate and adherence with high-dose amoxicillin and proton pump inhibitor as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection: Experience from University Hospital in Chile.

INTRODUCTION: In Chile, more than 70% of adults are infected by Helicobacter pylori. Clarithromycin should not be used in any regimen if there is >15% resistance to this antibiotic, being greater than 26% in our population. In this scenario, the effectiveness of triple therapy (proton pump inhibitor [PPI], clarithromycin, amoxicillin) was only 63.8%. AIM: To evaluate the eradication rate and safety of dual therapy (esomeprazole and amoxicillin) in high doses, through a prospective, observational, and descriptive study. METHODS: Patients with a positive urease test obtained in an upper digestive endoscopy were included. Any other previous H. pylori eradication regimen were excluded. All patients were treated with esomeprazole 40 mg three times a day and amoxicillin 750 mg four times a day for 14 days. The eradication rate of the dual therapy was evaluated with the H. pylori stool antigen test (the Pylori-Strip® test used) 6 weeks after completing the eradication treatment and with at least 14 days without PPI, being a negative result, confirmation of the effectiveness of this regimen. RESULTS: Of 122 patients, 106 had a negative H. pylori antigen in stool; The intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, the eradication rates were 91.8% [95% CI: 87%-97%] and 94% [95% CI: 90%-98%], respectively. Four patients discontinued treatment due to adverse effects. Smoking and adherence to treatment were associated with eradication rate. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with H. pylori infection, high-dose dual therapy has a high eradication rate and good adherence, raising the possibility that it could be used as first-line therapy in our country. Studies with a larger number of patients should confirm these results.

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with telmisartan, rosuvastatin, and ezetimibe in patients with dyslipidemia and hypertension: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, therapeutic confirmatory, phase III clinical trial.

This study aimed to compare and evaluate the efficacy of the blood pressure (BP) control and cholesterol-lowering effects and safety of combination therapy with telmisartan, rosuvastatin, and ezetimibe versus rosuvastatin and ezetimibe double therapy or telmisartan single therapy in dyslipidemia patients with hypertension. After a wash-out/therapeutic lifestyle change period of ≥4 weeks, a total of 100 eligible patients were randomized and received one of three treatments for 8 weeks: (1) telmisartan 80 mg/rosuvastatin 20 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (TRE), (2) rosuvastatin 20 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (RE), or (3) telmisartan 80 mg (T). The primary endpoint was the efficacy evaluation of TRE by comparing changes in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) and mean percentage change in low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment. The least square (LS) mean (SE) changes in msSBP at 8 weeks compared with baseline were -23.02 (3.04) versus -7.18 (3.09) mmHg in the TRE and RE groups, respectively (p < .0001), and -25.80 (2.74) versus -14.92 (2.65) mmHg in the TRE and T groups, respectively (p = .0005). The percentage changes in the mean (SD) LDL-C at 8 weeks compared with baseline were -54.97% (3.49%) versus -0.17% (3.23%) in the TRE and T groups, respectively (p < .0001). No serious adverse events occurred, and no statistically significant differences in the incidence of overall AEs and adverse drug reactions occurred among the three groups. TRE therapy significantly decreased msSBP and LDL-C compared to RE or T therapy with comparable safety and tolerability profiles.

A pilot study evaluating high dose esomeprazole, bismuth subcitrate and amoxicillin for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection in Iran.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is strongly associated with peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. We evaluated two triple therapy regimens comprising esomeprazole, high dose bismuth, and different doses of amoxicillin for first-line H. pylori eradication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients with dyspepsia and naive H. pylori infection were randomly assigned into two groups (n = 100). Both groups were treated for 14 days similarly with esomeprazole (40 mg, twice daily) and bismuth subcitrate (240 mg, three times daily), but the dose of amoxicillin was varied between Groups A (750 mg) and B (1000 mg) three times daily. Treatment compliance and side effect were evaluated following the therapies and after 8 weeks, a negative test of stool H. pylori antigen confirmed eradication. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with respect to sex and age. According to intention to treat analysis, eradication rates were 80% (95% CI: 77.2%-82.8%) and 90% (95% CI: 84.1%-95.9%) in A and B groups, respectively (p = 0.22). Per-protocol eradication rates were 87% (95% CI: 80.4%-93.6%) and 92.8% (95% CI: 87.7%-97.9%), respectively (p = 0.23). Severe adverse effects were 3% and 2%, respectively (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: High dose esomeprazole, amoxicillin and bismuth achieved 92.8% cure rates per protocol in a country with a high background rate of resistance. Additional studies are needed to ascertain whether this therapy can be further improved. Until then, it can be recommended as a first-line H. pylori eradication in north of Iran.

Nephrotoxic Risk Associated With Combination Therapy of Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Background: The combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) has been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalized patients when compared to similar combinations. Additional studies examining this nephrotoxic risk in critically ill patients have not consistently demonstrated the aforementioned association. Furthermore, patients with baseline renal dysfunction have been excluded from almost all of these studies, creating a need to examine the risk in this patient population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of critically ill adults with baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) who received vancomycin plus an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam at Emory University Hospital. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI. Secondary outcomes included stage of AKI, time to development of AKI, time to return to baseline renal function, new requirement for renal replacement therapy, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 109 patients were included. There was no difference observed in the primary outcome between the VPT (50%) and comparator (58%) group (P = .4), stage 2 or 3 AKI (15.9% vs 6%; P = .98), time to AKI development (1.7 vs 2 days; P = .5), time to return to baseline renal function (4 vs 3 days; P = .2), new requirement for RRT (4.5% vs 1.5%; P = .3), ICU length of stay (7.3 vs 7.4 days; P = .9), hospital length of stay (19.3 vs 20.1 days; P = .87), or in-hospital mortality (15.9% vs 10.8%; P = .4). A significant difference was observed in the duration of antibiotic exposure (3.32 vs 2.62 days; P = .045 days). Conclusion: VPT was not associated with an increased risk of AKI or adverse renal outcomes. Our findings suggest that the use of this antibiotic combination should not be avoided in this patient population. More robust prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

La revisión del tratamiento de un paciente muy complejo fácilmente encuentra aspectos mejorables. A propósito de un caso / The review of the treatment of a very complex patient easily finds areas for improvement. Case report

Presentación del caso. Varón de 100 años presenta un episodio de bradicardia profundo. El cuidador del paciente avisa a urgencias y estos retiran el bisoprolol controlándose la bradicardia. Una vez solucionado el problema nos preguntan si alguno de sus medicamentos puede tener relación con la bradicardia. Estudio y evaluación. Al revisar todo el tratamiento del paciente, muy complejo, no podemos establecer una relación clara entre alguno de sus 19 medicamentos y la bradicardia, salvo el bisoprolol ya retirado, pero encontramos otros 6 problemas que intentamos solucionar. Resultado. De los 6 cambios propuestos se aceptan 3. Comentario final. La revisión de un tratamiento complejo probablemente permita detectar algunos aspectos mejorables en el mismo. (AU)

Case presentation. A 100-year-old male presented with an episode of profound bradycardia. The patient’s carer alerted the emergency department and they withdrew the bisoprolol and controlled the bradycardia. Once the problem was resolved, we were asked if any of his medications could be related to the bradycardia. Assessment and evaluation. On reviewing all the patient’s treatment, which is very complex, we cannot establish a clear relationship between any of his 19 drugs and the bradycardia, except for the bisoprolol already withdrawn, but we found 6 other problems that we tried to solve. Results. Of the 6 proposed changes, 3 are accepted. Final comment. The review of a complex treatment will probably allow us to detect some aspects that could be improved. (AU)

Single-dose rituximab plus glucocorticoid versus cyclophosphamide plus glucocorticoid in patients with newly diagnosed acquired hemophilia A: A multicenter, open-label, randomized noninferiority trial.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare but serious bleeding disorder. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the efficacy of immunosuppression therapy for AHA lacks. We conducted the first multicenter RCT aiming to establish whether the single-dose rituximab combination regimen was noninferior to the cyclophosphamide combination regimen. From 2017 to 2022, 63 patients with newly diagnosed AHA from five centers were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive glucocorticoid (methylprednisolone 0.8 mg/kg per day for the first 3 weeks and then tapered) plus single-dose rituximab (375 mg/m2 ; n = 31) or plus cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg per day until inhibitor becomes negative, for a maximum of 5 weeks; n = 32). The primary outcome was complete remission (CR, defined as FVIII activity ≥50 IU/dL, FVIII inhibitor undetectable, immunosuppression tapered and no bleeding for 24 h without bypassing agents) rate measured within 8 weeks. The noninferiority margin was an absolute difference of 20%. Twenty-four (77.4%) patients in the rituximab group and 22 (68.8%) patients in the cyclophosphamide group achieved CR, which showed the noninferiority of the single-dose rituximab-based regimen (absolute difference = -8.67%, lower limit of the 95% confidence interval = -13.11%; Pnoninferiority = 0.005). No difference was found in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Single-dose rituximab plus glucocorticoid regimen showed similar efficacy and safety, without a reported risk of secondary malignancies or reproductive toxicity seen in cyclophosphamide, it might be recommended as a first-line therapy for AHA, especially in China where there is a young age trend in AHA patients. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03384277.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of K-924 Pitavastatin/Ezetimibe Fixed-dose Combination in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia: A Phase III, Multi-center, Open-label Trial.

AIM: Ezetimibe administration with ongoing statin therapy is an effective option for further lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Thus, we investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination of pitavastatin/ezetimibe (K-924 LD: 2 mg/10 mg; K-924 HD: 4 mg/10 mg). METHODS: We conducted a phase III, multicenter, open-label trial involving patients with hypercholesterolemia receiving pitavastatin (2 or 4 mg) who had not achieved their LDL-C management target. Patients were enrolled into the K-924 LD and HD groups based on whether they had received pitavastatin 2 and 4 mg, respectively, and treated for 52 weeks. K-924 was administered orally once daily. The primary objective was to examine the percent change in LDL-C from baseline at week 52 with last observation carried forward imputation (LOCF) in all patients. RESULTS: Of the 109 patients evaluated, 62 and 47 were assigned to the K-924 LD and HD groups, respectively. In all patients, LDL-C decreased by -30.3±14.3% (p＜0.001) from baseline (134.4±37.9 mg/dL). Consequently, 91.8% and 37.5% of the patients for primary and secondary prevention reached their LDL-C management target, respectively. These results were consistent in both the K-924 LD and HD groups. In the safety analysis, a single adverse drug reaction occurred in a patient in the K-924 HD group. CONCLUSION: After replacing pitavastatin monotherapy, K-924 was found to be effective and well-tolerated over 52 weeks. Thus, K-924 can contribute to intensifying LDL-C-lowering therapy without increasing the number of medications.

Real-world outcomes of concomitant antidepressant and statin use in primary care patients with depression: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants are licensed for use in depressive disorders, but non-response and poor adherence to treatment affect a considerable number of patients. Pre-clinical and clinical evidence suggest that statins can augment the effects of antidepressants. However, the acceptability and tolerability of combining statins with antidepressants are unclear, and their add-on efficacy has only been shown in small, short-term clinical trials. Observational data can provide complementary information about treatment effects on larger samples over longer follow-ups. In this study, we therefore assessed the real-world acceptability, tolerability, and efficacy of concomitant antidepressant and statin treatment in depression. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study investigating QResearch primary care research database, which comprises the anonymised electronic healthcare records of 35 + million patients over 1574 English general practices. Patients aged 18-100 years, registered between January 1998 and August 2020, diagnosed with a new episode of depression, and commencing an antidepressant were included. Using a between-subject design, we identified two study groups: antidepressant + statin versus antidepressant-only prescriptions. Outcomes of interest included the following: antidepressant treatment discontinuations due to any cause (acceptability) and due to any adverse event (tolerability) and effects on depressive symptoms (efficacy) measured as response, remission, and change in depression score on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. All outcomes were assessed at 2, 6, and 12 months using multivariable regression analyses, adjusted for relevant confounders, to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) or mean differences (aMDs) with 99% confidence intervals (99% CIs). RESULTS: Compared to antidepressant-only (N 626,335), antidepressant + statin (N 46,482) was associated with higher antidepressant treatment acceptability (aOR2months 0.88, 99% CI 0.85 to 0.91; aOR6months 0.81, 99% CI 0.79 to 0.84; aOR12months 0.78, 99% CI 0.75 to 0.81) and tolerability (aOR2months 0.92, 99% CI 0.87 to 0.98; aOR6months 0.94, 99% CI 0.89 to 0.99, though not long term aOR12 months 1.02, 99% CI 0.97 to 1.06). Efficacy did not differ between groups (range aOR2-12 months 1.00 and 1.02 for response and remission, range aOR2-12 months - 0.01 and - 0.02 for change in depression score). CONCLUSIONS: On real-world data, there is a positive correlation between antidepressant treatment adherence and statin use, partly explained by fewer dropouts due to adverse events. The main limitation of our study is its observational design, which restricts the potential to make causal inferences.

Safety of low dose efavirenz regimen in Indian adults with HIV-1 infection: Insights from a phase 4 interventional randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: A randomized interventional phase 4 study in the Indian population confirmed the non-inferiority of the combination tenofovir/lamivudine/efavirenz (TLE)-400 to TLE600. The current manuscript describes in detail the safety profile and patient-reported safety outcomes obtained from the phase 4 study. METHODS: This investigation was part of a phase 4 non-inferiority study with a blinded assessment, conducted across 17 sites in India. The duration of the study was 24 weeks. Safety endpoints assessed included all the adverse events (AEs) related to the study treatment (TLE400 and TLE600). The depression anxiety stress 21-item scale questionnaire and efavirenz-related symptom questionnaire were also used to measure depression, anxiety, stress, and patient experience. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients (52.3%) reported 261 AEs and 87 patients (64.9%) reported 379 AEs related to study treatment in TLE400 group and TLE600 group respectively, P = .037. The reported AEs associated with central nervous system disorders were lower in the TLE400 group with 41 patients (31.5%) to 61 patients (45.5%) in the TLE600 group. The change from mean baseline value for depression anxiety stress 21-item scale at week 28 in TLE400 group and TLE600 group was -5.1 and -6.2 respectively. Similarly, the mean change from baseline score of efavirenz-related symptoms at week 28 in TLE400 group and TLE600 group were -5.1 and -4.1 respectively. CONCLUSION: The low dose efavirenz (400 mg) in combination with tenofovir and lamivudine had a better safety and tolerability profile than the standard dose of efavirenz (600 mg) in combination with tenofovir and lamivudine. Thus, low dose efavirenz should be preferred over the standard dose.

Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab induction with or without budesonide in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease in Europe: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab (VDZ), a gut-selective anti-lymphocyte trafficking integrin antibody, is effective in treating patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). In this study, we examined the real-world effectiveness and safety of induction therapy using VDZ alone or in combination with budesonide (VDZ + BUD) among patients with CD in Belgium, Israel, and Switzerland. METHODS: This retrospective chart review analysis included adult patients with moderately to severely active CD who started induction treatment with VDZ or VDZ + BUD (January 2015 through January 2019). The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness in terms of clinical remission of VDZ alone or VDZ + BUD using patient-reported outcomes (PRO) of abdominal pain (AP) and/or loose stool frequency (LSF) (PRO-2) at weeks 0, 2, 6, 10, and 14. Regression models were used to assess differences and associations between the treatment groups. RESULTS: Overall, 123 patients were included (VDZ, n = 73; VDZ + BUD, n = 50). Clinical remission rates at week 14 were 71.4% (50/70) and 68.0% (34/50) with VDZ and VDZ + BUD, respectively. Mean percentage change in AP and LSF from baseline to week 14 was comparable between the groups. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) time to clinical remission was 91 [70.0-98.0] and 95 [70.0-98.0] days, respectively. One patient in each group discontinued VDZ and 68.0% of patients in the VDZ + BUD group discontinued BUD before week 14. The rates of overall adverse events were similar between the groups (VDZ, 23.3%; VDZ + BUD, 26.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, VDZ alone and VDZ + BUD showed similar high remission rates in patients with moderately to severely active CD. Prospective randomized studies are needed to conclude on the role of combining VDZ with BUD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Palonosetrón: prevención de náuseas y vómitos en adultos, inducidos por quimioterapia de moderada y altamente emetógena / Palonosetrón: prevention of nausea and vomiting in adults, induced by moderate and highly emetogenic chemotherapy

CONTEXTO CLÍNICO: Las náuseas y los vómitos inducidos por la quimioterapia son graves y preocupantes. existen varios tratamientos antieméticos eficaces y bien tolerados por el paciente, no obstante, las náuseas y los vómitos inducidos por la quimioterapia sigue siendo un efecto adverso importante del tratamiento. La emesis se puede medir objetivamente mediante observación directa e independiente. Las náuseas, que a menudo acompañan a la emesis, son una sensación subjetiva que requiere el autoinforme del paciente para cuantificarla. Se han definido tres tipos distintos de náuseas y los vómitos inducidos por la quimioterapia: aguda, tardía y anticipatoria. Reconocer las diferencias entre estos tipos de náuseas y los vómitos inducidos por la quimioterapia tiene implicaciones importantes tanto para la prevención como para el tratamiento. Emesis aguda: la emesis aguda se define como la que ocurre durante las primeras 24 horas después de la quimioterapia. En ausencia de una profilaxis eficaz, lo más habitual es que comience entre una y dos horas después de la quimioterapia y, por lo general, alcanza su punto máximo en las primeras cuatro a seis horas. INFORMACIÓN FARMACOLÓGICA: Palonosetrón es un antagonista del receptor 5-HT 3 con una fuerte afinidad de unión por este receptor y poca o ninguna afinidad por otros receptores. ESTRATEGIAS DE BÚSQUEDA DE INFORMACIÓN: Se realizó una búsqueda en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas Pubmed, términos utilizados náuseas, vómitos, inducidos, quimioterapia, prevención, emesis, altamente emetógena, moderadamente emetógena. Se filtra la búsqueda a Estudios Clínicos fase III, controlados randomizados, Revisiones Sistemáticas, Meta-análisis, Guías de Práctica Clínica, además se limitó la búsqueda estudios en humanos. También se realiza búsqueda manual en otras bases de datos bibliográficas (Cochrane, NIH, TRIP DATABASE), en buscadores genéricos de internet, agencias de evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias y financiadores de salud. Se priorizó la inclusión de revisiones sistemáticas, metaanálisis, estudios clínicos aleatorizados y controlados, guías de práctica clínica, evaluaciones de tecnología sanitaria, evaluaciones económicas y políticas de cobertura de otros sistemas de salud. CONCLUSIONES: El agente de segunda generación palonosetrón tiene una afinidad de 30 a 100 veces mayor por el receptor 5-HT3 y una vida media significativamente más larga (40 horas) en comparación con los antagonistas del receptor 5-HT3 de primera generación (29).Las náuseas y los vómitos inducidos por la quimioterapia (CINV) son un efecto adverso importante del tratamiento. El factor más importante que determina la probabilidad de que se desarrolle una emesis aguda o retardada es la emetogenicidad intrínseca de un agente quimioterapéutico en particular. Como agente único, palonosetrón es más eficaz que ondansetrón o dolasetrón para prevenir la emesis debida a agentes quimioterapéuticos de emetogenicidad variable (30). Esto quedó ilustrado por un ensayo multicéntrico en 592 pacientes, la mayoría de los cuales recibieron doxorrubicina y ciclofosfamida para el cáncer de mama; una minoría recibió regímenes de quimioterapia basados en cisplatino y carboplatino. Los sujetos fueron asignados aleatoriamente a una dosis única IV de palonosetrón en uno de dos niveles de dosis (0,25 o 0,75 mg IV) o dolasetrón (100 mg). Más pacientes tratados con palonosetrón (0,25 mg) tuvieron un control completo de la emesis aguda (63 frente a 53 por ciento) y tardía (54 frente a 39 por ciento) en comparación con dolasetrón. La dosis de 0,75 mg no fue significativamente superior en comparación con la de 0,25 mg. Un ensayo diseñado de manera similar también demostró la superioridad del palonosetrón en comparación con el ondansetrón. Cuando se usa en combinación con glucocorticoides, palonosetrón proporciona un control superior de la emesis retardada en comparación con los antagonistas del receptor 5-HT3 de primera generación combinados con glucocorticoides. Las directrices antieméticas actualizadas de la Red Nacional Integral del Cáncer (NCCN) recomiendan palonosetrón como el antagonista 5-HT3 preferido para pacientes que reciben quimioterapia moderadamente emetógena. Por el contrario, las directrices actualizadas de la Asociación Multinacional de Atención de Apoyo en Cáncer (MASCC)/Sociedad Europea de Oncología Médica (ESMO) y la Sociedad Americana de Oncología Clínica (ASCO) no especifican un antagonista 5-HT3 preferido para pacientes que reciben tratamiento emetógeno moderado. Los antagonistas del receptor 5-HT3 son generalmente seguros, con un perfil de efectos secundarios favorable (predominantemente dolor de cabeza leve, malestar general y estreñimiento.