Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
2.
Vaccine ; 38(22): 3854-3861, 2020 05 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32291102

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccination against Ebolavirus is an emerging public health tool during Ebola Virus Disease outbreaks. We examined demand issues related to deployment of Ebolavirus vaccine during the 2014-2015 outbreak in Sierra Leone. METHODS: A cluster survey was administered to a population-based sample in December 2014 (N = 3540), before any Ebola vaccine was available to the general public in Sierra Leone. Ebola vaccine demand was captured in this survey by three Likert-scale items that were used to develop a composite score and dichotomized into a binary outcome to define high demand. A multilevel logistic regression model was fitted to assess the associations between perceptions of who should be first to receive an Ebola vaccine and the expression of high demand for an Ebola vaccine. RESULTS: The largest proportion of respondents reported that health workers (35.1%) or their own families (29.5%) should receive the vaccine first if it became available, rather than politicians (13.8%), vaccination teams (9.8%), or people in high risk areas (8.2%). High demand for an Ebola vaccine was expressed by 74.2% of respondents nationally. The odds of expressing high demand were 13 times greater among those who said they or their families should be the first to take the vaccine compared to those who said politicians should be the first recipients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 13.0 [95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8-21.6]). The ultra-brief measure of the Ebola vaccine demand demonstrated acceptable scale reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.79) and construct validity (single-factor loadings > 0.50). CONCLUSION: Perceptions of who should be the first to get the vaccine was associated with high demand for Ebola vaccine around the peak of the outbreak in Sierra Leone. Using an ultra-brief measure of Ebola vaccine demand is a feasible solution in outbreak settings and can help inform development of future rapid assessment tools.


Subject(s)
Ebola Vaccines/supply & distribution , Health Resources/ethics , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola , Vaccination/ethics , Disease Outbreaks , Ebola Vaccines/administration & dosage , Ebolavirus/immunology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/prevention & control , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Sierra Leone/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Rev Med Suisse ; 16(690): 739-743, 2020 Apr 15.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32301308

ABSTRACT

The Ebola virus disease outbreak raging in the North-Kivu and Ituri provinces of Democratic Republic of the Congo already accounts for more than 3400 cases, from which 2200 died. Major progress have been achieved since the 2014-2016 West Africa outbreak. A vaccine is now approved by the European Medicine Agency and has been administered to more than 250 000 volunteers in the field. New specific antiviral treatments are now available. Ebola virus disease shifted from a deadly disease to a preventable, curable one. However, the long-lasting conflict and repeated attacks of civilians and health workers hampers the control of the outbreak.


L'épidémie de maladie à virus Ebola (MVE) qui sévit dans les provinces du Nord-Kivu et de l'Ituri en République démocratique du Congo dans le nord-est du pays a déjà touché plus de 3400 personnes dont plus de 2200 sont décédées. Depuis la grande épidémie d'Afrique de l'Ouest en 2014-2016, d'énormes progrès ont été faits en termes de prise en charge et de prévention de la maladie. Il existe maintenant un vaccin homologué en Europe et d'autres sont en développement. L'efficacité des traitements spécifiques permet de modifier le devenir des patients infectés. De mortelle, la MVE est devenue évitable et guérissable. L'insé- curité de la région, zone de conflit depuis plus de 30 ans, rend cependant le contrôle de l'épidémie difficile.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/supply & distribution , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Ebola Vaccines/supply & distribution , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/drug therapy , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Africa, Western/epidemiology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Democratic Republic of the Congo/epidemiology , Ebola Vaccines/administration & dosage , Ebolavirus/drug effects , Ebolavirus/immunology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/prevention & control , Humans
11.
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol ; 411: 229-261, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28918539

ABSTRACT

The Ebola virus disease outbreak that began in Western Africa in December 2013 was unprecedented in both scope and spread, and the global response was slower and less coherent than was optimal given the scale and pace of the epidemic. Past experience with limited localized outbreaks, lack of licensed medical countermeasures, reluctance by first responders to direct scarce resources to clinical research, community resistance to outside interventions, and lack of local infrastructure were among the factors delaying clinical research during the outbreak. Despite these hurdles, the global health community succeeded in accelerating Ebola virus vaccine development, in a 5-month interval initiating phase I trials in humans in September 2014 and initiating phase II/III trails in February 2015. Each of the three Ebola virus disease-affected countries, Sierra Leone, Guinea, and Liberia, conducted a phase II/III Ebola virus vaccine trial. Only one of these trials evaluating recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus expressing Ebola virus glycoprotein demonstrated vaccine efficacy using an innovative mobile ring vaccination trial design based on a ring vaccination strategy responsible for eradicating smallpox that reached areas of new outbreaks. Thoughtful and intensive community engagement in each country enabled the critical community partnership and acceptance of the phase II/III in each country. Due to the delayed clinical trial initiation, relative to the epidemiologic peak of the outbreak in the three countries, vaccine interventions may or may not have played a major role in bringing the epidemic under control. Having demonstrated that clinical trials can be performed during a large outbreak, the global research community can now build on the experience to implement trials more rapidly and efficiently in future outbreaks. Incorporating clinical research needs into planning for future health emergencies and understanding what kind of trial designs is needed for reliable results in an epidemic of limited duration should improve global response to future infectious disease outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Ebola Vaccines/supply & distribution , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/prevention & control , Africa, Western/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/transmission , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL