Prevalence of Suicidality in Adolescents With Newly Diagnosed Focal Epilepsy at Diagnosis and Over the Following 36 Months.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Individuals with epilepsy have increased risk of suicidal ideation (SI) and behaviors when compared with the general population. This relationship has remained largely unexplored in adolescents. We investigated the prevalence of suicidality in adolescents with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy within 4 months of treatment initiation and over the following 36 months. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the enrollment and follow-up data from the Human Epilepsy Project, an international, multi-institutional study that enrolled participants between 2012 and 2017. Participants enrolled were 11-17 years of age within 4 months of treatment initiation for focal epilepsy. We used data from the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), administered at enrollment and over the 36-month follow-up period, along with data from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 66 adolescent participants were enrolled and completed the C-SSRS. At enrollment, 14 (21%) had any lifetime SI and 5 (8%) had any lifetime suicidal behaviors (SBs). Over the following 36 months, 6 adolescents reported new onset SI and 5 adolescents reported new onset SB. Thus, the lifetime prevalence of SI within this population increased from 21% to 30% (14-20 adolescents), and the lifetime prevalence of SB increased from 8% to 15% (5-10). DISCUSSION: The prevalence of suicidality in adolescents with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy reported in our study is consistent with previous findings of significant suicidality observed in epilepsy. We identify adolescents as an at-risk population at the time of epilepsy diagnosis and in the following years.

Epilepsia partialis continua: A review.

Epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) is a rare type of focal motor seizure characterized by continuous, involuntary muscle contractions in a specific part of the body. These contractions usually involve rhythmic, twitching movements and can last for several hours to days. The seizures are usually limited to one part of the body and can be clonic or dystonic. EPC can affect people of all ages but is more common in children and adolescents. The pathophysiology of EPC is complex and depends on the cause. There are several possible causes of EPC including structural brain abnormalities, infections, metabolic and genetic disorders, inflammatory conditions, traumatic brain injury, and vascular causes. The work-up of EPC includes electroencephalography (EEG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, position emission tomography (PET) scan of the brain, autoimmune antibodies, infection work-up, and metabolic and genetic work-up. The management of EPC can be challenging. Antiseizure medications (ASDs) including benzodiazepines are an integral part of the management of EPC. Immunotherapy trials are recommended in resistant cases. Epilepsy surgery is one of the effective modalities in some surgically amenable cases. This article reviews the topic of EPC and summarizes diagnostic and .treatment recommendations.

Long-term effects of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate in adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures: Post hoc analysis of a phase III trial.

A post hoc analysis of data from Asian patients included in the study BIA-2093-304 was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety/tolerability and efficacy of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures. Part I was a randomized controlled trial, in which patients received ESL (800 or 1200 mg once daily [QD]) or placebo, assessed over a 12-week maintenance period. Patients completing Part I could enter two open-label extension periods (Part II, 1 year; Part III, ≥2 years), during which all received ESL (400-1600 mg QD). Safety/tolerability was assessed by evaluating treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy assessments included responder and seizure freedom rates. The safety population included 125, 92, and 23 Asian patients in Parts I, II, and III, respectively. Incidence of ESL-related TEAEs was 61.3%, 45.7%, and 17.4% during Parts I, II, and III, respectively. ESL-related TEAEs (most commonly, dizziness, somnolence, and headache) were consistent with ESL's known safety profile. During Part I, responder rates were higher with ESL 800 (41.7%) and 1200 mg QD (44.4%) versus placebo (32.6%), although not statistically significant. Seizure freedom rates with ESL 800 (5.5%) and 1200 mg QD (11.1%) were also higher versus placebo (0%) (p < 0.05 for ESL 1200 mg QD versus placebo). At the end of Part II, responder and seizure freedom rates were 60.3% and 14.7%, respectively. In summary, adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures were responsive to treatment with ESL as adjunctive therapy and generally showed treatment tolerance well for up to 3 years. No new/unexpected safety findings were observed.

Postoperative Neurologic Outcome in Patients Undergoing Resective Surgery for Parietal Lobe Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Parietal lobe epilepsy (PLE) surgery can be an effective treatment for selected patients with intractable epilepsy but can be associated with the risk of serious neurologic deficits. We performed a systematic review of the literature to obtain a comprehensive summary of the frequency and types of new postoperative neurologic deficits in patients undergoing PLE resective surgery. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for articles published between January 1, 1990, and April 28, 2022. We included studies that reported postoperative neurologic outcome following PLE resective surgery confined to the parietal lobe. We required that studies included ≥5 patients. The data collected included demographic information and specific details of postoperative neurologic deficits. When available, individual patient data were collected. We used the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool to assess the risk of bias and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to assess the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Of the 3,461 articles screened, 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 370 patients were included. One hundred patients (27.0%) had a new deficit noted postoperatively. Approximately half of the patients with deficits experienced only transient deficits. Motor deficits were the most commonly identified deficit. The rates of motor deficits noted after PLE surgery were 5.7%, 3.2%, and 2.2% for transient, long-term, and duration not specified, respectively. Sensory and visual field deficits were also commonly reported. Gerstmann syndrome was noted postoperatively in 4.9% of patients and was almost always transient. Individual patient data added information on parietal lobe subregion postoperative neurologic outcome. DISCUSSION: Our systematic review provides a comprehensive summary of the frequency and types of neurologic deficits associated with PLE surgery. A significant percentage of postoperative deficits are transient. In addition to the expected sensory and visual deficits, PLE surgery is associated with a notable risk of motor deficits. The available literature has important deficiencies. Our study highlights gaps in the literature and provides recommendations for future directions. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022313108, May 26, 2022).

Unrecognized Focal Nonmotor Seizures in Adolescents Presenting to Emergency Departments.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many adolescents with undiagnosed focal epilepsy seek evaluation in emergency departments (EDs). Accurate history-taking is essential to prompt diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we investigated ED recognition of motor vs nonmotor seizures and its effect on management and treatment of focal epilepsy in adolescents. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of enrollment data from the Human Epilepsy Project (HEP), an international multi-institutional study that collected data from 34 sites between 2012 and 2017. Participants were 12 years or older, neurotypical, and within 4 months of treatment initiation for focal epilepsy. We used HEP enrollment medical records to review participants' initial diagnosis and management. RESULTS: A total of 83 adolescents were enrolled between 12 and 18 years. Fifty-eight (70%) presented to an ED before diagnosis of epilepsy. Although most ED presentations were for motor seizures (n = 52; 90%), many patients had a history of nonmotor seizures (20/52 or 38%). Adolescents with initial nonmotor seizures were less likely to present to EDs (26/44 or 59% vs 32/39 or 82%, p = 0.02), and nonmotor seizures were less likely to be correctly identified (2/6 or 33% vs 42/52 or 81%, p = 0.008). A history of initial nonmotor seizures was not recognized in any adolescent who presented for a first-lifetime motor seizure. As a result, initiation of treatment and admission from the ED was not more likely for these adolescents who met the definition of epilepsy compared with those with no seizure history. This lack of nonmotor seizure history recognition in the ED was greater than that observed in the adult group (0% vs 23%, p = 0.03) and occurred in both pediatric and nonpediatric ED settings. DISCUSSION: Our study supports growing evidence that nonmotor seizures are often undiagnosed, with many individuals coming to attention only after conversion to motor seizures. We found this treatment gap is exacerbated in the adolescent population. Our study highlights a critical need for physicians to inquire about the symptoms of nonmotor seizures, even when the presenting seizure is motor. Future interventions should focus on improving nonmotor seizure recognition for this population in EDs.

Stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the epileptogenic zone: a potential treatment and prognostic indicator for subsequent excision surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) for drug-resistant focal epilepsy and investigate the relationship between post-RFTC remission duration and delayed excision surgery effectiveness. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 43 patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent RFTC via SEEG electrodes. After excluding three, the remaining 40 were classified into subgroups based on procedures and outcomes. Twenty-four patients (60%) underwent a secondary excision surgery. We determined the predictive value of RFTC outcome upon subsequent surgical outcome by categorizing the delayed secondary surgery outcome as success (Engel I/II) versus failure (Engel III/IV). Demographic information, epilepsy characteristics, and the duration of seizure freedom after RFTC were assessed. RESULTS: Among 40 patients, 20% achieved Engel class I with RFTC alone, while 24 underwent delayed secondary excision surgery. Overall, 41.7% attained Engel class I, with a 66.7% success rate combining RFTC with delayed surgery. Seizure freedom duration was significantly longer in the success group (mean 4.9 months, SD = 2.7) versus the failure group (mean 1.9 months, SD = 1.1; P = 0.007). A higher proportion of RFTC-only and delayed surgical success group patients had preoperative lesional findings (p = 0.01), correlating with a longer time to seizure recurrence (p < 0.05). Transient postoperative complications occurred in 10%, resolving within a year. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that SEEG-guided RFTC is a safe and potential treatment option for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. A prolonged duration of seizure freedom following RFTC may serve as a predictive marker for the success of subsequent excision surgery.

DEPDC5 plays a vital role in epilepsy: Genotypic and phenotypic features in cohort and literature.

OBJECTIVE: DEPDC5 emerges to play a vital role in focal epilepsy. However, genotype-phenotype correlation in DEPDC5-related focal epilepsies is challenging and controversial. In this study, we aim to investigate the genotypic and phenotypic features in DEPDC5-affected patients. METHODS: Genetic testing combined with criteria published by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP), was used to identify pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in DEPDC5 among the cohort of 479 patients with focal epilepsy. Besides, the literature review was performed to explore the genotype-phenotype correlation and the penetrance in DEPDC5-related focal epilepsies. RESULTS: Eight unrelated probands were revealed to carry different pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in DEPDC5 and the total prevalence of DEPDC5-related focal epilepsy was 1.67% in the cohort. Sixty-five variants from 28 studies were included in our review. Combined with the cases reported, null variants accounted for a larger proportion than missense variants and were related to unfavorable prognosis (drug resistance or even sudden unexpected death in epilepsy; χ2 = 5.429, p = .020). And, the prognosis of probands with developmental delay/intellectual disability or focal cortical dysplasia was worse than that of probands with simple epilepsy (χ2 = -, p = .006). Besides, the overall penetrance of variants in DEPDC5 was 68.96% (231/335). SIGNIFICANCE: The study expands the variant spectrum of DEPDC5 and proves that the DEPDC5 variant plays a significant role in focal epilepsy. Due to the characteristics of phenotypic heterogeneity and incomplete penetrance, genetic testing is necessary despite no specific family history. And we propose to adopt the ACMG/AMP criteria refined by ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group, for consistency in usage and transparency in classification rationale. Moreover, we reveal an important message to clinicians that the prognosis of DEPDC5-affected patients is related to the variant type and complications.

Long-term seizure diary tracking habits in clinical studies: Evidence from the Human Epilepsy Project.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize seizure tracking patterns of people with focal epilepsy using electronic seizure diary entries, and to assess for risk factors associated with poor tracking. METHODS: We analyzed electronic seizure diary data from 410 participants with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy in the Human Epilepsy Project 1 (HEP1). Each participant was expected to record data each day during the study, regardless of seizure occurrence. The primary outcome of this post-hoc analysis was whether each participant properly tracked a seizure diary entry each day during their study participation. Using finite mixture modeling, we grouped patient tracking trajectories into data-driven clusters. Once defined, we used multinomial modeling to test for independent risk factors of tracking group membership. RESULTS: Using over up to three years of daily seizure diary data per subject, we found four distinct seizure tracking groups: consistent, frequent at study onset, occasional, and rare. Participants in the consistent tracking group tracked a median of 92% (interquartile range, IQR: 82%, 99%) of expected days, compared to 47% (IQR:34%, 60%) in the frequent at study onset group, 37% (IQR: 26%, 49%) in the occasional group, and 9% (IQR: 3%, 15%) in the rare group. In multivariable analysis, consistent trackers had lower rates of seizure days per tracked year during their study participation, compared to other groups. SIGNIFICANCE: Future efforts need to focus on improving seizure diary tracking adherence to improve quality of outcome data, particularly in those with higher seizure burden. In addition, accounting for missing data when using seizure diary data as a primary outcome is important in research trials. If not properly accounted for, total seizure burden may be underestimated and biased, skewing results of clinical trials.

High-precision stereotactic irradiation for focal drug-resistant epilepsy versus standard treatment: a randomized waitlist-controlled trial (the PRECISION trial).

INTRODUCTION: The standard treatment for patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are not eligible for open brain surgery is the continuation of anti-seizure medication (ASM) and neuromodulation. This treatment does not cure epilepsy but only decreases severity. The PRECISION trial offers a non-invasive, possibly curative intervention for these patients, which consist of a single stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatment. Previous studies have shown promising results of SRT in this patient population. Nevertheless, this intervention is not yet available and reimbursed in the Netherlands. We hypothesize that: SRT is a superior treatment option compared to palliative standard of care, for patients with focal DRE, not eligible for open surgery, resulting in a higher reduction of seizure frequency (with 50% of the patients reaching a 75% seizure frequency reduction at 2 years follow-up). METHODS: In this waitlist-controlled phase 3 clinical trial, participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either receive SRT as the intervention, while the standard treatments consist of ASM continuation and neuromodulation. After 2-year follow-up, patients randomized for the standard treatment (waitlist-control group) are offered SRT. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with focal DRE and a pretreatment defined epileptogenic zone (EZ) not eligible for open surgery will be included. The intervention is a LINAC-based single fraction (24 Gy) SRT treatment. The target volume is defined as the epileptogenic zone (EZ) on all (non) invasive examinations. The seizure frequency will be monitored on a daily basis using an electronic diary and an automatic seizure detection system during the night. Potential side effects are evaluated using advanced MRI, cognitive evaluation, Common Toxicity Criteria, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of the SRT treatment will be evaluated. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized trial comparing SRT with standard of care in patients with DRE, non-eligible for open surgery. The primary objective is to determine whether SRT significantly reduces the seizure frequency 2 years after treatment. The results of this trial can influence the current clinical practice and medical cost reimbursement in the Netherlands for patients with focal DRE who are not eligible for open surgery, providing a non-invasive curative treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05182437. Registered on September 27, 2021.

Intraoperative changes in large-scale thalamic circuitry following laser ablation of hypothalamic hamartomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gelastic seizures due to hypothalamic hamartomas (HH) are challenging to treat, in part due to an incomplete understanding of seizure propagation pathways. Although magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a promising intervention to disconnect HH from ictal propagation networks, the optimal site of ablation to achieve seizure freedom is not known. In this study, we investigated intraoperative post-ablation changes in resting-state functional connectivity to identify large-scale networks associated with successful disconnection of HH. METHODS: Children who underwent MRgLITT for HH at two institutions were consecutively recruited and followed for a minimum of one year. Seizure freedom was defined as Engel score of 1A at the last available follow-up. Immediate pre- and post- ablation resting-state functional MRI scans were acquired while maintaining a constant depth of general anesthetic. Multivariable generalized linear models were used to identify intraoperative changes in large-scale connectivity associated with seizure outcomes. RESULTS: Twelve patients underwent MRgLITT for HH, five of whom were seizure-free at their last follow-up. Intraprocedural changes in thalamocortical circuitry involving the anterior cingulate cortex were associated with seizure-freedom. Children who were seizure-free demonstrated an increase and decrease in connectivity to the pregenual and dorsal anterior cingulate cortices, respectively. In addition, children who became seizure-free demonstrated increased thalamic connectivity to the periaqueductal gray immediately following MRgLITT. DISCUSSION: Successful disconnection of HH is associated with intraoperative, large-scale changes in thalamocortical connectivity. These changes provide novel insights into the large-scale basis of gelastic seizures and may represent intraoperative biomarkers of treatment success.

Systematic Analysis of the Relationship Between Elevated Zinc and Epilepsy.

Previous studies have indicated a potential relationship between zinc and epilepsy. The aim of this study is to investigate the causal relationship between zinc, zinc-dependent carbonic anhydrase, and gray matter volume in brain regions enriched with zinc and epilepsy, as well as explore the possible mechanisms by which zinc contributes to epilepsy. First, this study assessed the risk causality between zinc, carbonic anhydrase, and gray matter volume alterations in zinc-enriched brain regions and various subtypes of epilepsy based on Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. And then, this study conducted GO/KEGG analysis based on colocalization analysis, MAGMA analysis, lasso regression, random forest model, and XGBoost model. The results of Mendelian randomization analyses showed a causal relationship between zinc, carbonic anhydrase-4, and generalized epilepsy (p = 0.044 , p = 0.010). Additionally, carbonic anhydrase-1 and gray matter volume of the caudate nucleus were found to be associated with epilepsy and focal epilepsy (p = 0.014, p = 0.003 and p = 0.022, p = 0.009). A colocalization relationship was found between epilepsy and focal epilepsy (PP.H4.abf = 97.7e - 2). Meanwhile, the MAGMA analysis indicated that SNPs associated with epilepsy and focal epilepsy were functionally localized to zinc-finger-protein-related genes (p < 1.0e - 5). The genes associated with focal epilepsy were found to have a molecular function of zinc ion binding (FDR = 2.3e - 6). After the onset of epilepsy, the function of the gene whose expression changed in the rats with focal epilepsy was enriched in the biological process of vascular response (FDR = 4.0e - 5). These results revealed mechanism of the increased risk of epilepsy caused by elevated zinc may be related to the increase of zinc ion-dependent carbonic anhydrase or the increase of the volume of zinc-rich caudate gray matter.

Multisensory flicker modulates widespread brain networks and reduces interictal epileptiform discharges.

Modulating brain oscillations has strong therapeutic potential. Interventions that both non-invasively modulate deep brain structures and are practical for chronic daily home use are desirable for a variety of therapeutic applications. Repetitive audio-visual stimulation, or sensory flicker, is an accessible approach that modulates hippocampus in mice, but its effects in humans are poorly defined. We therefore quantified the neurophysiological effects of flicker with high spatiotemporal resolution in patients with focal epilepsy who underwent intracranial seizure monitoring. In this interventional trial (NCT04188834) with a cross-over design, subjects underwent different frequencies of flicker stimulation in the same recording session with the effect of sensory flicker exposure on local field potential (LFP) power and interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) as primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Flicker focally modulated local field potentials in expected canonical sensory cortices but also in the medial temporal lobe and prefrontal cortex, likely via resonance of stimulated long-range circuits. Moreover, flicker decreased interictal epileptiform discharges, a pathological biomarker of epilepsy and degenerative diseases, most strongly in regions where potentials were flicker-modulated, especially the visual cortex and medial temporal lobe. This trial met the scientific goal and is now closed. Our findings reveal how multi-sensory stimulation may modulate cortical structures to mitigate pathological activity in humans.

Multimodal Approach for the Treatment of Complex Hypothalamic Hamartomas.

Hypothalamic hamartomas (HHs) are rare congenital lesions formed by heterotopic neuronal and glial cells attached to the mammillary bodies, tuber cinereum, and hypothalamus.They often present with an intractable epilepsy typically characterized by gelastic seizures but commonly associated with other types of refractory seizures. The clinical course is progressive in most of the cases, starting with gelastic seizures in infancy and deteriorating into complex seizure disorders that result in catastrophic epilepsy associated with cognitive decline and behavioral disturbances.Hamartomas are known to be intrinsically epileptogenic and the site of origin for the gelastic seizures. As antiepileptic drugs are typically ineffective in controlling HH-related epilepsy, different surgical options have been proposed as a treatment to achieve seizure control. Resection or complete disconnection of the hamartoma from the mammillothalamic tract has proved to achieve a long-lasting control of the epileptic syndrome.Usually, symptoms and their severity are typically related to the size, localization, and type of attachment. Precocious puberty appears mostly in the pedunculated type, while epileptic syndrome and behavioral decline are frequently related to the sessile type. For this reason, different classifications of HHs have been developed based on their size, extension, and type of attachment to the hypothalamus.The bigger and more complex hypothalamic hamartomas typically present with severe refractory epilepsy, behavioral disturbances, and progressive cognitive decline posing a formidable challenge for the control of these symptoms.We present here our experience with the multimodal treatment for complex hypothalamic hamartomas. After an in-depth review of the literature, we systematize our approach for the different types of hypothalamic hamartomas.

Using scalp EEG to predict seizure recurrence and electrical status epilepticus in children with idiopathic focal epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Some individuals with idiopathic focal epilepsy (IFE) experience recurring seizures accompanied by the evolution of electrical status epilepticus during sleep (ESES). Here, we aimed to develop a predictor for the early detection of seizure recurrence with ESES in children with IFE using resting state electroencephalogram (EEG) data. METHODS: The study group included 15 IFE patients who developed seizure recurrence with ESES. There were 17 children in the control group who did not experience seizure recurrence with ESES during at least 2-year follow-up. We used the degree value of the partial directed coherence (PDC) from the EEG data to predict seizure recurrence with ESES via 6 machine learning (ML) algorithms. RESULTS: Among the models, the Xgboost Classifier (XGBC) model achieved the highest specificity of 0.90, and a remarkable sensitivity and accuracy of 0.80 and 0.85, respectively. The CATC showed balanced performance with a specificity of 0.85, sensitivity of 0.73, and an accuracy of 0.80, with an AUC equal to 0.78. For both of these models, F4, Fz and T4 were the overlaps of the top 4 features. CONCLUSIONS: Considering its high classification accuracy, the XGBC model is an effective and quantitative tool for predicting seizure recurrence with ESES evolution in IFE patients. We developed an ML-based tool for predicting the development of IFE using resting state EEG data. This could facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of patients with IFE.

A comparison of cenobamate with other newer antiseizure medications for adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cenobamate with other newer anti-seizure medications (ASMs) including brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, perampanel, and zonisamide, approved for adjunctive treatment of drug-resistant focal-onset seizures (FOS) in adults with epilepsy. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to obtain relevant efficacy, safety, and tolerability data for ASMs for the treatment of drug-resistant FOS. All studies were thoroughly assessed for potential sources of heterogeneity and analysed via Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs). Efficacy outcomes were ≥50 % responder rate and seizure freedom during the maintenance period, which were modelled simultaneously using a multinomial Bayesian NMA. Safety and tolerability outcomes were the proportion of patients who experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and the proportion who experienced at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation. RESULTS: The SLR identified 76 studies, of which 23 were included in the Bayesian NMAs. Cenobamate was associated with statistically significant higher rates for the ≥50 % responder rate and seizure freedom outcomes compared with all ASMs analysed. The point estimates indicated that cenobamate was associated with higher rates of experiencing at least one TEAE and at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation compared with brivaracetam, lacosamide, and zonisamide; however, no results were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Cenobamate was associated with increased efficacy compared with all ASMs analysed. There were no statistically significant differences in the safety and tolerability outcomes. The results presented corroborate the conclusions drawn from previous published NMAs, which also highlight the notable efficacy of cenobamate in comparison with other ASMs.

Construction and validation of an algorithm to separate focal and generalised epilepsy using clinical variables: A comparison of machine learning approaches.

PURPOSE: Epilepsy type, whether focal or generalised, is important in deciding anti-seizure medication (ASM). In resource-limited settings, investigations are usually not available, so a clinical separation is required. We used a naïve Bayes approach to devise an algorithm to do this, and compared its accuracy with algorithms devised by five other machine learning methods. METHODS: We used data on 28 clinical variables from 503 patients attending an epilepsy clinic in India with defined epilepsy type, as determined by an epileptologist with access to clinical, imaging, and EEG data. We adopted a machine learning approach to select the most relevant variables based on mutual information, to train the model on part of the data, and then to evaluate it on the remaining data (testing set). We used a naïve Bayes approach and compared the results in the testing set with those obtained by several other machine learning algorithms by measuring sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the curve, and Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: The six machine learning methods produced broadly similar results. The best naïve Bayes algorithm contained eleven variables, and its accuracy was 92.2% in determining epilepsy type (sensitivity 92.0%, specificity 92.7%). An algorithm incorporating the best eight of these variables was only slightly less accurate - 91.0% (sensitivity 89.6%, and specificity 95.1%) - and easier for clinicians to use. CONCLUSION: A clinical algorithm with eight variables is effective and accurate at separating focal from generalised epilepsy. It should be useful in resource-limited settings, by epilepsy-inexperienced doctors, to help determine epilepsy type and therefore optimal ASMs for individual patients, without the need for EEG or neuroimaging.

Attention-based deep convolutional neural network for classification of generalized and focal epileptic seizures.

Epilepsy affects over 50 million people globally. Electroencephalography is critical for epilepsy diagnosis, but manual seizure classification is time-consuming and requires extensive expertise. This paper presents an automated multi-class seizure classification model using EEG signals from the Temple University Hospital Seizure Corpus ver. 1.5.2. 11 features including time-based correlation, time-based eigenvalues, power spectral density, frequency-based correlation, frequency-based eigenvalues, sample entropy, spectral entropy, logarithmic sum, standard deviation, absolute mean, and ratio of Daubechies D4 wavelet transformed coefficients were extracted from 10-second sliding windows across channels. The model combines multi-head self-attention mechanism with a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify seven subtypes of generalized and focal epileptic seizures. The model achieved 0.921 weighted accuracy and 0.902 weighted F1 score in classifying focal onset non-motor, generalized onset non-motor, simple partial, complex partial, absence, tonic, and tonic-clonic seizures. In comparison, a CNN model without multi-head attention achieved 0.767 weighted accuracy. Ablation studies were conducted to validate the importance of transformer encoders and attention. The promising classification results demonstrate the potential of deep learning for handling EEG complexity and improving epilepsy diagnosis. This seizure classification model could enable timely interventions when translated into clinical practice.

Current challenges in focal epilepsy treatment: An Italian Delphi consensus.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy, a globally prevalent neurological condition, presents distinct challenges in management, particularly for focal-onset types. This study aimed at addressing the current challenges and perspectives in focal epilepsy management, with focus on the Italian reality. METHODS: Using the Delphi methodology, this research collected and analyzed the level of consensus of a panel of Italian epilepsy experts on key aspects of focal epilepsy care. Areas of focus included patient flow, treatment pathways, controlled versus uncontrolled epilepsy, follow-up protocols, and the relevance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This method allowed for a comprehensive assessment of consensus and divergences in clinical opinions and practices. RESULTS: The study achieved consensus on 23 out of 26 statements, with three items failing to reach a consensus. There was strong agreement on the importance of timely intervention, individualized treatment plans, regular follow-ups at Epilepsy Centers, and the role of PROs in clinical practice. In cases of uncontrolled focal epilepsy, there was a clear inclination to pursue alternative treatment options following the failure of two previous therapies. Divergent views were evident on the inclusion of epilepsy surgery in treatment for uncontrolled epilepsy and the routine necessity of EEG evaluations in follow-ups. Other key findings included concerns about the lack of pediatric-specific research limiting current therapeutic options in this patient population, insufficient attention to the transition from pediatric to adult care, and need for improved communication. The results highlighted the complexities in managing epilepsy, with broad consensus on patient care aspects, yet notable divergences in specific treatment and management approaches. CONCLUSION: The study offered valuable insights into the current state and complexities of managing focal-onset epilepsy. It highlighted many deficiencies in the therapeutic pathway of focal-onset epilepsy in the Italian reality, while it also underscored the importance of patient-centric care, the necessity of early and appropriate intervention, and individualized treatment approaches. The findings also called for continued research, policy development, and healthcare system improvements to enhance epilepsy management, highlighting the ongoing need for tailored healthcare solutions in this evolving field.

Non-lesional epilepsy does not necessarily convey poor outcomes after invasive monitoring followed by resection or thermal ablation.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare outcomes including seizure-free status at the last follow-up in adult patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy identified as lesional vs. non-lesional based on their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings who underwent invasive evaluation followed by subsequent resection or thermal ablation (LiTT). METHODS: We identified 88 adult patients who underwent intracranial monitoring between 2014 and 2021. Of those, 40 received resection or LiTT, and they were dichotomized based on MRI findings, as lesional (N = 28) and non-lesional (N = 12). Patient demographics, seizure characteristics, non-invasive interventions, intracranial monitoring, and surgical variables were compared between the groups. Postsurgical seizure outcome at the last follow-up was rated according to the Engel classification, and postoperative seizure freedom was determined by Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis. Statistical analyses employed Fisher's exact test to compare categorical variables, while a t-test was used for continuous variables. RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups except for more often noted PET abnormality in the lesional group (p = 0.0003). 64% of the lesional group and 57% of the non-lesional group received surgical resection or LiTT (p = 0.78). At the last follow-up, 78.5% of the patients with lesional MRI findings achieved Engel I outcomes compared to 66.7% of non-lesional patients (p = 0.45). Kaplan-Meier curves did not show a significant difference in seizure-free duration between both groups after surgical intervention (p = 0.49). SIGNIFICANCE: In our sample, the absence of lesion on brain MRI was not associated with worse seizure outcomes in adult patients who underwent invasive intracranial monitoring followed by resection or thermal ablation.

Spanish consensus on the management of concomitant antiseizure medications when using cenobamate in adults with drug-resistant focal seizures.

OBJECTIVE: Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) associated with high rates of seizure freedom and acceptable tolerability in patients with focal seizures. To achieve the optimal cenobamate dose for maximal potential effectiveness while avoiding or minimizing drug-related adverse events (AEs), the administration of cenobamate with other ASMs must be managed through concomitant ASM load reduction. A panel of Spanish epilepsy experts aimed to provide a Spanish consensus on how to adjust the dose of concomitant ASMs in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in order to improve the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate. METHODS: A three-stage modified Delphi consensus process was undertaken, including six Spanish epileptologists with extensive experience using cenobamate. Based on current literature and their own expert opinion, the expert panel reached a consensus on when and how to adjust the dosage of concomitant ASMs during cenobamate titration. RESULTS: The expert panel agreed that tailored titration and close follow-up are required to achieve the best efficacy and tolerability when initiating cenobamate in patients receiving concomitant ASMs. When concomitant clobazam, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and sodium channel blockers are taken at high dosages, or when the patient is receiving two or more sodium channel blockers, dosages should be proactively lowered during the cenobamate titration period. Other concomitant ASMs should be reduced only if the patient reports a moderate/severe AE at any stage of the titration period. SIGNIFICANCE: Cenobamate is an effective ASM with a dose-dependent effect. To maximize effectiveness while maintaining the best tolerability profile, co-medication management is needed. The recommendations included herein provide practical guidance for proactive and reactive management of co-medication in cenobamate-treated patients with DRE and a high drug load. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patients with epilepsy may continue to have seizures even after treatment with several different antiseizure medications (ASMs). Cenobamate is an ASM that can reduce seizures in these patients. In this study, six Spanish experts in epilepsy discussed the best way to use cenobamate in drug-resistant epilepsy. They provide practical guidance on when and how the dose of other ASMs might be adjusted to reduce side effects and optimize the use of cenobamate.